Why there's no solution of closed form for the transcendental equations?












0














I just saw this question and I saw this kind of question in MSE a lot before. Also, the answers are always same: such equations can't be solved as a closed form in general, and we can only find its numerical solution. I also believe this, but why? There are some similar questions in integral, and I know that can be answered by Liouville's theorem, which proves that integrals such as
$$
int e^{x^{2}}dx, quad int frac{sin x}{x} dx, quad int sqrt{1-x^{4}}dx, quad intfrac{1}{log x}dx
$$

can't be solved in terms of elementary functions (that can be expressed as polynomials, trigonometry functions, exponential functions, logarithmic functions, and their composition and $n$-th root).
Do we have a similar theorem for equations such as $e^{x}(x^{2}+3x+1) = 5sin (log x)$? Thanks in advance.










share|cite|improve this question



























    0














    I just saw this question and I saw this kind of question in MSE a lot before. Also, the answers are always same: such equations can't be solved as a closed form in general, and we can only find its numerical solution. I also believe this, but why? There are some similar questions in integral, and I know that can be answered by Liouville's theorem, which proves that integrals such as
    $$
    int e^{x^{2}}dx, quad int frac{sin x}{x} dx, quad int sqrt{1-x^{4}}dx, quad intfrac{1}{log x}dx
    $$

    can't be solved in terms of elementary functions (that can be expressed as polynomials, trigonometry functions, exponential functions, logarithmic functions, and their composition and $n$-th root).
    Do we have a similar theorem for equations such as $e^{x}(x^{2}+3x+1) = 5sin (log x)$? Thanks in advance.










    share|cite|improve this question

























      0












      0








      0







      I just saw this question and I saw this kind of question in MSE a lot before. Also, the answers are always same: such equations can't be solved as a closed form in general, and we can only find its numerical solution. I also believe this, but why? There are some similar questions in integral, and I know that can be answered by Liouville's theorem, which proves that integrals such as
      $$
      int e^{x^{2}}dx, quad int frac{sin x}{x} dx, quad int sqrt{1-x^{4}}dx, quad intfrac{1}{log x}dx
      $$

      can't be solved in terms of elementary functions (that can be expressed as polynomials, trigonometry functions, exponential functions, logarithmic functions, and their composition and $n$-th root).
      Do we have a similar theorem for equations such as $e^{x}(x^{2}+3x+1) = 5sin (log x)$? Thanks in advance.










      share|cite|improve this question













      I just saw this question and I saw this kind of question in MSE a lot before. Also, the answers are always same: such equations can't be solved as a closed form in general, and we can only find its numerical solution. I also believe this, but why? There are some similar questions in integral, and I know that can be answered by Liouville's theorem, which proves that integrals such as
      $$
      int e^{x^{2}}dx, quad int frac{sin x}{x} dx, quad int sqrt{1-x^{4}}dx, quad intfrac{1}{log x}dx
      $$

      can't be solved in terms of elementary functions (that can be expressed as polynomials, trigonometry functions, exponential functions, logarithmic functions, and their composition and $n$-th root).
      Do we have a similar theorem for equations such as $e^{x}(x^{2}+3x+1) = 5sin (log x)$? Thanks in advance.







      abstract-algebra






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Nov 24 at 3:09









      Seewoo Lee

      6,110826




      6,110826



























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3011127%2fwhy-theres-no-solution-of-closed-form-for-the-transcendental-equations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown






























          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3011127%2fwhy-theres-no-solution-of-closed-form-for-the-transcendental-equations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Quarter-circle Tiles

          build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

          Mont Emei