Why does “money” take “the” in “all the money in the world”?





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}






up vote
15
down vote

favorite
3












"All the money in the world " , in this sentence we talk about money in general , right ? I've read a book that says if we're talking about things in general we do not use "the".
So why "the money" ?










share|improve this question






























    up vote
    15
    down vote

    favorite
    3












    "All the money in the world " , in this sentence we talk about money in general , right ? I've read a book that says if we're talking about things in general we do not use "the".
    So why "the money" ?










    share|improve this question


























      up vote
      15
      down vote

      favorite
      3









      up vote
      15
      down vote

      favorite
      3






      3





      "All the money in the world " , in this sentence we talk about money in general , right ? I've read a book that says if we're talking about things in general we do not use "the".
      So why "the money" ?










      share|improve this question















      "All the money in the world " , in this sentence we talk about money in general , right ? I've read a book that says if we're talking about things in general we do not use "the".
      So why "the money" ?







      grammar articles definite-article






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 2 days ago









      Laurel

      4,55811127




      4,55811127










      asked 2 days ago









      isac

      8015




      8015






















          7 Answers
          7






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          21
          down vote



          accepted










          This sentence is not talking about money in general. It is talking about a specific set: "all the money in the world", as if it was a specific quantity you could receive:




          Suppose I gave you a box with all the money in the world. How would you choose to distribute it?




          Other examples talking about a specific set of money:




          Do you still have the money I gave you for your birthday?



          The money donated to charities should be included on your tax forms, if you want to take the deduction.




          It is possible to talk about money as a concept, in which case you would not use the definite article. Examples of this:




          I don't care too much for money, and money can't buy me love -- John Lennon / Paul McCartney



          A wise person should have money in their head, but not in their heart. --Jonathan Swift



          Money is a terrible master but an excellent servant. --P.T. Barnum




          It is possible to say "all money in the world" to reference the global concept of money, rather than a specific quantity.




          All money in the world, in whatever form, relies on the collective agreement that it is worth something. Even a brick of gold has no value to a starving man, unless he can exchange it for food.




          [Edit] With regard to FumbleFinger's objection: I would claim "money donated to charities" is either a kind of ellipsis, or else refers to a conceptual subset of the concept of money. In my example, it makes little difference whether I'm talking in general about the practice of donating money, or of a specific instance of some quantity donated. The second half of the sentence applies either way.




          Conceptual example: Money (which has been generally) donated to charities should be declared.



          Ellipsis example: (The specific quantity of) Money (which you have) donated to charities should be declared.




          I think a more in-depth exploration is out of the scope of the question, as OP asks only what the definite article means in this context, and not whether the definite article is required.






          share|improve this answer























          • All [the] water on earth originally came from comets. That may not be a true statement, but it's syntactically fine with or without the article - or with all of the water, come to that. So I don't really see how your talking about a specific set point really "explains" anything here.
            – FumbleFingers
            2 days ago










          • @FumbleFingers I've edited to try and explain the distinction.
            – Andrew
            2 days ago






          • 2




            @isac please take note of my edits. It is possible to omit the definite article, but this changes the meaning.
            – Andrew
            2 days ago










          • I've cancelled earlier downvote, but still can't see sufficient reason to upvote. I couldn't bring myself to accept article-less Suppose I gave you a box with all money in the world, but there's nothing wrong with Money donated to charities should be included on your tax forms. And in a context such as I still have [the] money [that] I earned when I last had a job, I can't really see that including the article or not makes any difference at all to the meaning - it certainly doesn't seem to be a matter of whether or not "money" represents a "concept".
            – FumbleFingers
            2 days ago












          • @FumbleFingers edited again. I think we're starting to get well above the scope of this question (and out of my depth), and it might be better posed to ELU to get a truly complete answer.
            – Andrew
            2 days ago




















          up vote
          5
          down vote













          You have misunderstood what was meant in that book by "in general".



          In this sentence, we are speaking of money and water in general terms:




          Money is an alternative to barter.



          Water is necessary for life.




          But here, even though we are speaking of "all", we're still speaking of the thing in particular:




          All the water in the watering hole dries up during the summer dry season.



          All the money in the world couldn't get me to do that.







          share|improve this answer





















          • Per comment to @Andrew's answer, and noting that even All water in the watering hole dries up during the summer dry season is "more or less" okay without the article, it's not obvious to me that there's a "complete" explanation here.
            – FumbleFingers
            2 days ago










          • @FumbleFingers: You wouldn't say "I drank all water in the glass." But you might say "I siphoned all water from the tank" and "All water in the beaker evaporates when you place it over the bunsen burner". Since you bring it up, care to explain why?
            – Tᴚoɯɐuo
            2 days ago












          • I don't think I know how to explain why - but I kinda assumed you would, if you could be so motivated.
            – FumbleFingers
            2 days ago






          • 1




            @FumbleFingers: I lack (the) motivation. :) But all is a shape-shifter.
            – Tᴚoɯɐuo
            2 days ago








          • 1




            @Alexander Kosubek: And you would be wrong to use the article. The money is an alternative to the barter is not grammatical in English.
            – Tᴚoɯɐuo
            yesterday




















          up vote
          4
          down vote













          I don't know what book told you that, but it's not the truth.1



          Fact is, there are several reasons we might use the definite article. Macmillan (definition 1b) says:




          used when you are referring to familiar things that people deal with regularly



          I looked up at the ceiling; suddenly all the lights went out




          Many familiar adages and expressions use the definite article even though they talk about things in general. Consider:




          • The lion is king of the jungle.

          • Top of the morning to you!

          • It hit me right between the eyes.

          • Religion is the opiate of the masses.

          • All the news that's fit to print.




          1See what I did there?






          share|improve this answer




























            up vote
            3
            down vote













            Ditto Andrew's excellent answer, let me just add:



            Don't get confused by the difference between how something is in the real world, and how it is grammatically.



            Yes, in real life, "all the money in the world" is, well, all the money that exists. Logically, you might say that it's the same as "money" as a general concept. But GRAMMATICALLY, "all the money in the world" is NOT all money that exists, it's a specific set of money, namely, the money that is "in the world". While in real life that may be all money, grammatically it is not.






            share|improve this answer




























              up vote
              2
              down vote













              The big, fancy language scholar term for this particular use of the definite article, "the", is "modadic"—the as in the one and only.



              From your example, rephrased:




              There is only one collection of all money in the one and only world.




              Reference:




              8. Monadic



              ("One of a Kind" or "Unique")




              The Article






              share|improve this answer










              New contributor




              Jesse Steele is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.


















              • I'm gonna upvote this one purely because you didn't include the "optional" article in There is only one collection of all the money in the one and only world, even though you didn't specifically draw attention to that yourself!
                – FumbleFingers
                2 days ago






              • 1




                I'm so glad you noticed that! I was mindful of not wanting to use a circular definition with the first "one", with the one and only "the" being qualified enough not to be. ;-)
                – Jesse Steele
                2 days ago


















              up vote
              1
              down vote













              All the money in the world would not make you happy.



              We only have one specific world, and all the money in it is very specific.



              Having money in the bank is a good thing, if its yours. [non-specific]



              And: The money I have in the bank is none of your business. [specific]



              Please note: for certain expressions such as money in the bank, a the is used with bank.






              share|improve this answer




























                up vote
                1
                down vote













                There is a word elided which will make parsing the phrase easier:




                All of the money in the world




                "Of money" is wrong for different reasons -- the preposition requires more than just a bare noun.






                share|improve this answer





















                • This is the point I was hoping to see. As with most English, we've munged it up so it doesn't follow our own quidelines by omitting a word.
                  – Scott Baker
                  10 hours ago











                Your Answer








                StackExchange.ready(function() {
                var channelOptions = {
                tags: "".split(" "),
                id: "481"
                };
                initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
                // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
                StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
                createEditor();
                });
                }
                else {
                createEditor();
                }
                });

                function createEditor() {
                StackExchange.prepareEditor({
                heartbeatType: 'answer',
                convertImagesToLinks: false,
                noModals: true,
                showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                reputationToPostImages: null,
                bindNavPrevention: true,
                postfix: "",
                imageUploader: {
                brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
                contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
                allowUrls: true
                },
                noCode: true, onDemand: true,
                discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                });


                }
                });














                 

                draft saved


                draft discarded


















                StackExchange.ready(
                function () {
                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f186691%2fwhy-does-money-take-the-in-all-the-money-in-the-world%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                }
                );

                Post as a guest















                Required, but never shown

























                7 Answers
                7






                active

                oldest

                votes








                7 Answers
                7






                active

                oldest

                votes









                active

                oldest

                votes






                active

                oldest

                votes








                up vote
                21
                down vote



                accepted










                This sentence is not talking about money in general. It is talking about a specific set: "all the money in the world", as if it was a specific quantity you could receive:




                Suppose I gave you a box with all the money in the world. How would you choose to distribute it?




                Other examples talking about a specific set of money:




                Do you still have the money I gave you for your birthday?



                The money donated to charities should be included on your tax forms, if you want to take the deduction.




                It is possible to talk about money as a concept, in which case you would not use the definite article. Examples of this:




                I don't care too much for money, and money can't buy me love -- John Lennon / Paul McCartney



                A wise person should have money in their head, but not in their heart. --Jonathan Swift



                Money is a terrible master but an excellent servant. --P.T. Barnum




                It is possible to say "all money in the world" to reference the global concept of money, rather than a specific quantity.




                All money in the world, in whatever form, relies on the collective agreement that it is worth something. Even a brick of gold has no value to a starving man, unless he can exchange it for food.




                [Edit] With regard to FumbleFinger's objection: I would claim "money donated to charities" is either a kind of ellipsis, or else refers to a conceptual subset of the concept of money. In my example, it makes little difference whether I'm talking in general about the practice of donating money, or of a specific instance of some quantity donated. The second half of the sentence applies either way.




                Conceptual example: Money (which has been generally) donated to charities should be declared.



                Ellipsis example: (The specific quantity of) Money (which you have) donated to charities should be declared.




                I think a more in-depth exploration is out of the scope of the question, as OP asks only what the definite article means in this context, and not whether the definite article is required.






                share|improve this answer























                • All [the] water on earth originally came from comets. That may not be a true statement, but it's syntactically fine with or without the article - or with all of the water, come to that. So I don't really see how your talking about a specific set point really "explains" anything here.
                  – FumbleFingers
                  2 days ago










                • @FumbleFingers I've edited to try and explain the distinction.
                  – Andrew
                  2 days ago






                • 2




                  @isac please take note of my edits. It is possible to omit the definite article, but this changes the meaning.
                  – Andrew
                  2 days ago










                • I've cancelled earlier downvote, but still can't see sufficient reason to upvote. I couldn't bring myself to accept article-less Suppose I gave you a box with all money in the world, but there's nothing wrong with Money donated to charities should be included on your tax forms. And in a context such as I still have [the] money [that] I earned when I last had a job, I can't really see that including the article or not makes any difference at all to the meaning - it certainly doesn't seem to be a matter of whether or not "money" represents a "concept".
                  – FumbleFingers
                  2 days ago












                • @FumbleFingers edited again. I think we're starting to get well above the scope of this question (and out of my depth), and it might be better posed to ELU to get a truly complete answer.
                  – Andrew
                  2 days ago

















                up vote
                21
                down vote



                accepted










                This sentence is not talking about money in general. It is talking about a specific set: "all the money in the world", as if it was a specific quantity you could receive:




                Suppose I gave you a box with all the money in the world. How would you choose to distribute it?




                Other examples talking about a specific set of money:




                Do you still have the money I gave you for your birthday?



                The money donated to charities should be included on your tax forms, if you want to take the deduction.




                It is possible to talk about money as a concept, in which case you would not use the definite article. Examples of this:




                I don't care too much for money, and money can't buy me love -- John Lennon / Paul McCartney



                A wise person should have money in their head, but not in their heart. --Jonathan Swift



                Money is a terrible master but an excellent servant. --P.T. Barnum




                It is possible to say "all money in the world" to reference the global concept of money, rather than a specific quantity.




                All money in the world, in whatever form, relies on the collective agreement that it is worth something. Even a brick of gold has no value to a starving man, unless he can exchange it for food.




                [Edit] With regard to FumbleFinger's objection: I would claim "money donated to charities" is either a kind of ellipsis, or else refers to a conceptual subset of the concept of money. In my example, it makes little difference whether I'm talking in general about the practice of donating money, or of a specific instance of some quantity donated. The second half of the sentence applies either way.




                Conceptual example: Money (which has been generally) donated to charities should be declared.



                Ellipsis example: (The specific quantity of) Money (which you have) donated to charities should be declared.




                I think a more in-depth exploration is out of the scope of the question, as OP asks only what the definite article means in this context, and not whether the definite article is required.






                share|improve this answer























                • All [the] water on earth originally came from comets. That may not be a true statement, but it's syntactically fine with or without the article - or with all of the water, come to that. So I don't really see how your talking about a specific set point really "explains" anything here.
                  – FumbleFingers
                  2 days ago










                • @FumbleFingers I've edited to try and explain the distinction.
                  – Andrew
                  2 days ago






                • 2




                  @isac please take note of my edits. It is possible to omit the definite article, but this changes the meaning.
                  – Andrew
                  2 days ago










                • I've cancelled earlier downvote, but still can't see sufficient reason to upvote. I couldn't bring myself to accept article-less Suppose I gave you a box with all money in the world, but there's nothing wrong with Money donated to charities should be included on your tax forms. And in a context such as I still have [the] money [that] I earned when I last had a job, I can't really see that including the article or not makes any difference at all to the meaning - it certainly doesn't seem to be a matter of whether or not "money" represents a "concept".
                  – FumbleFingers
                  2 days ago












                • @FumbleFingers edited again. I think we're starting to get well above the scope of this question (and out of my depth), and it might be better posed to ELU to get a truly complete answer.
                  – Andrew
                  2 days ago















                up vote
                21
                down vote



                accepted







                up vote
                21
                down vote



                accepted






                This sentence is not talking about money in general. It is talking about a specific set: "all the money in the world", as if it was a specific quantity you could receive:




                Suppose I gave you a box with all the money in the world. How would you choose to distribute it?




                Other examples talking about a specific set of money:




                Do you still have the money I gave you for your birthday?



                The money donated to charities should be included on your tax forms, if you want to take the deduction.




                It is possible to talk about money as a concept, in which case you would not use the definite article. Examples of this:




                I don't care too much for money, and money can't buy me love -- John Lennon / Paul McCartney



                A wise person should have money in their head, but not in their heart. --Jonathan Swift



                Money is a terrible master but an excellent servant. --P.T. Barnum




                It is possible to say "all money in the world" to reference the global concept of money, rather than a specific quantity.




                All money in the world, in whatever form, relies on the collective agreement that it is worth something. Even a brick of gold has no value to a starving man, unless he can exchange it for food.




                [Edit] With regard to FumbleFinger's objection: I would claim "money donated to charities" is either a kind of ellipsis, or else refers to a conceptual subset of the concept of money. In my example, it makes little difference whether I'm talking in general about the practice of donating money, or of a specific instance of some quantity donated. The second half of the sentence applies either way.




                Conceptual example: Money (which has been generally) donated to charities should be declared.



                Ellipsis example: (The specific quantity of) Money (which you have) donated to charities should be declared.




                I think a more in-depth exploration is out of the scope of the question, as OP asks only what the definite article means in this context, and not whether the definite article is required.






                share|improve this answer














                This sentence is not talking about money in general. It is talking about a specific set: "all the money in the world", as if it was a specific quantity you could receive:




                Suppose I gave you a box with all the money in the world. How would you choose to distribute it?




                Other examples talking about a specific set of money:




                Do you still have the money I gave you for your birthday?



                The money donated to charities should be included on your tax forms, if you want to take the deduction.




                It is possible to talk about money as a concept, in which case you would not use the definite article. Examples of this:




                I don't care too much for money, and money can't buy me love -- John Lennon / Paul McCartney



                A wise person should have money in their head, but not in their heart. --Jonathan Swift



                Money is a terrible master but an excellent servant. --P.T. Barnum




                It is possible to say "all money in the world" to reference the global concept of money, rather than a specific quantity.




                All money in the world, in whatever form, relies on the collective agreement that it is worth something. Even a brick of gold has no value to a starving man, unless he can exchange it for food.




                [Edit] With regard to FumbleFinger's objection: I would claim "money donated to charities" is either a kind of ellipsis, or else refers to a conceptual subset of the concept of money. In my example, it makes little difference whether I'm talking in general about the practice of donating money, or of a specific instance of some quantity donated. The second half of the sentence applies either way.




                Conceptual example: Money (which has been generally) donated to charities should be declared.



                Ellipsis example: (The specific quantity of) Money (which you have) donated to charities should be declared.




                I think a more in-depth exploration is out of the scope of the question, as OP asks only what the definite article means in this context, and not whether the definite article is required.







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited yesterday

























                answered 2 days ago









                Andrew

                62.8k573141




                62.8k573141












                • All [the] water on earth originally came from comets. That may not be a true statement, but it's syntactically fine with or without the article - or with all of the water, come to that. So I don't really see how your talking about a specific set point really "explains" anything here.
                  – FumbleFingers
                  2 days ago










                • @FumbleFingers I've edited to try and explain the distinction.
                  – Andrew
                  2 days ago






                • 2




                  @isac please take note of my edits. It is possible to omit the definite article, but this changes the meaning.
                  – Andrew
                  2 days ago










                • I've cancelled earlier downvote, but still can't see sufficient reason to upvote. I couldn't bring myself to accept article-less Suppose I gave you a box with all money in the world, but there's nothing wrong with Money donated to charities should be included on your tax forms. And in a context such as I still have [the] money [that] I earned when I last had a job, I can't really see that including the article or not makes any difference at all to the meaning - it certainly doesn't seem to be a matter of whether or not "money" represents a "concept".
                  – FumbleFingers
                  2 days ago












                • @FumbleFingers edited again. I think we're starting to get well above the scope of this question (and out of my depth), and it might be better posed to ELU to get a truly complete answer.
                  – Andrew
                  2 days ago




















                • All [the] water on earth originally came from comets. That may not be a true statement, but it's syntactically fine with or without the article - or with all of the water, come to that. So I don't really see how your talking about a specific set point really "explains" anything here.
                  – FumbleFingers
                  2 days ago










                • @FumbleFingers I've edited to try and explain the distinction.
                  – Andrew
                  2 days ago






                • 2




                  @isac please take note of my edits. It is possible to omit the definite article, but this changes the meaning.
                  – Andrew
                  2 days ago










                • I've cancelled earlier downvote, but still can't see sufficient reason to upvote. I couldn't bring myself to accept article-less Suppose I gave you a box with all money in the world, but there's nothing wrong with Money donated to charities should be included on your tax forms. And in a context such as I still have [the] money [that] I earned when I last had a job, I can't really see that including the article or not makes any difference at all to the meaning - it certainly doesn't seem to be a matter of whether or not "money" represents a "concept".
                  – FumbleFingers
                  2 days ago












                • @FumbleFingers edited again. I think we're starting to get well above the scope of this question (and out of my depth), and it might be better posed to ELU to get a truly complete answer.
                  – Andrew
                  2 days ago


















                All [the] water on earth originally came from comets. That may not be a true statement, but it's syntactically fine with or without the article - or with all of the water, come to that. So I don't really see how your talking about a specific set point really "explains" anything here.
                – FumbleFingers
                2 days ago




                All [the] water on earth originally came from comets. That may not be a true statement, but it's syntactically fine with or without the article - or with all of the water, come to that. So I don't really see how your talking about a specific set point really "explains" anything here.
                – FumbleFingers
                2 days ago












                @FumbleFingers I've edited to try and explain the distinction.
                – Andrew
                2 days ago




                @FumbleFingers I've edited to try and explain the distinction.
                – Andrew
                2 days ago




                2




                2




                @isac please take note of my edits. It is possible to omit the definite article, but this changes the meaning.
                – Andrew
                2 days ago




                @isac please take note of my edits. It is possible to omit the definite article, but this changes the meaning.
                – Andrew
                2 days ago












                I've cancelled earlier downvote, but still can't see sufficient reason to upvote. I couldn't bring myself to accept article-less Suppose I gave you a box with all money in the world, but there's nothing wrong with Money donated to charities should be included on your tax forms. And in a context such as I still have [the] money [that] I earned when I last had a job, I can't really see that including the article or not makes any difference at all to the meaning - it certainly doesn't seem to be a matter of whether or not "money" represents a "concept".
                – FumbleFingers
                2 days ago






                I've cancelled earlier downvote, but still can't see sufficient reason to upvote. I couldn't bring myself to accept article-less Suppose I gave you a box with all money in the world, but there's nothing wrong with Money donated to charities should be included on your tax forms. And in a context such as I still have [the] money [that] I earned when I last had a job, I can't really see that including the article or not makes any difference at all to the meaning - it certainly doesn't seem to be a matter of whether or not "money" represents a "concept".
                – FumbleFingers
                2 days ago














                @FumbleFingers edited again. I think we're starting to get well above the scope of this question (and out of my depth), and it might be better posed to ELU to get a truly complete answer.
                – Andrew
                2 days ago






                @FumbleFingers edited again. I think we're starting to get well above the scope of this question (and out of my depth), and it might be better posed to ELU to get a truly complete answer.
                – Andrew
                2 days ago














                up vote
                5
                down vote













                You have misunderstood what was meant in that book by "in general".



                In this sentence, we are speaking of money and water in general terms:




                Money is an alternative to barter.



                Water is necessary for life.




                But here, even though we are speaking of "all", we're still speaking of the thing in particular:




                All the water in the watering hole dries up during the summer dry season.



                All the money in the world couldn't get me to do that.







                share|improve this answer





















                • Per comment to @Andrew's answer, and noting that even All water in the watering hole dries up during the summer dry season is "more or less" okay without the article, it's not obvious to me that there's a "complete" explanation here.
                  – FumbleFingers
                  2 days ago










                • @FumbleFingers: You wouldn't say "I drank all water in the glass." But you might say "I siphoned all water from the tank" and "All water in the beaker evaporates when you place it over the bunsen burner". Since you bring it up, care to explain why?
                  – Tᴚoɯɐuo
                  2 days ago












                • I don't think I know how to explain why - but I kinda assumed you would, if you could be so motivated.
                  – FumbleFingers
                  2 days ago






                • 1




                  @FumbleFingers: I lack (the) motivation. :) But all is a shape-shifter.
                  – Tᴚoɯɐuo
                  2 days ago








                • 1




                  @Alexander Kosubek: And you would be wrong to use the article. The money is an alternative to the barter is not grammatical in English.
                  – Tᴚoɯɐuo
                  yesterday

















                up vote
                5
                down vote













                You have misunderstood what was meant in that book by "in general".



                In this sentence, we are speaking of money and water in general terms:




                Money is an alternative to barter.



                Water is necessary for life.




                But here, even though we are speaking of "all", we're still speaking of the thing in particular:




                All the water in the watering hole dries up during the summer dry season.



                All the money in the world couldn't get me to do that.







                share|improve this answer





















                • Per comment to @Andrew's answer, and noting that even All water in the watering hole dries up during the summer dry season is "more or less" okay without the article, it's not obvious to me that there's a "complete" explanation here.
                  – FumbleFingers
                  2 days ago










                • @FumbleFingers: You wouldn't say "I drank all water in the glass." But you might say "I siphoned all water from the tank" and "All water in the beaker evaporates when you place it over the bunsen burner". Since you bring it up, care to explain why?
                  – Tᴚoɯɐuo
                  2 days ago












                • I don't think I know how to explain why - but I kinda assumed you would, if you could be so motivated.
                  – FumbleFingers
                  2 days ago






                • 1




                  @FumbleFingers: I lack (the) motivation. :) But all is a shape-shifter.
                  – Tᴚoɯɐuo
                  2 days ago








                • 1




                  @Alexander Kosubek: And you would be wrong to use the article. The money is an alternative to the barter is not grammatical in English.
                  – Tᴚoɯɐuo
                  yesterday















                up vote
                5
                down vote










                up vote
                5
                down vote









                You have misunderstood what was meant in that book by "in general".



                In this sentence, we are speaking of money and water in general terms:




                Money is an alternative to barter.



                Water is necessary for life.




                But here, even though we are speaking of "all", we're still speaking of the thing in particular:




                All the water in the watering hole dries up during the summer dry season.



                All the money in the world couldn't get me to do that.







                share|improve this answer












                You have misunderstood what was meant in that book by "in general".



                In this sentence, we are speaking of money and water in general terms:




                Money is an alternative to barter.



                Water is necessary for life.




                But here, even though we are speaking of "all", we're still speaking of the thing in particular:




                All the water in the watering hole dries up during the summer dry season.



                All the money in the world couldn't get me to do that.








                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 2 days ago









                Tᴚoɯɐuo

                104k677168




                104k677168












                • Per comment to @Andrew's answer, and noting that even All water in the watering hole dries up during the summer dry season is "more or less" okay without the article, it's not obvious to me that there's a "complete" explanation here.
                  – FumbleFingers
                  2 days ago










                • @FumbleFingers: You wouldn't say "I drank all water in the glass." But you might say "I siphoned all water from the tank" and "All water in the beaker evaporates when you place it over the bunsen burner". Since you bring it up, care to explain why?
                  – Tᴚoɯɐuo
                  2 days ago












                • I don't think I know how to explain why - but I kinda assumed you would, if you could be so motivated.
                  – FumbleFingers
                  2 days ago






                • 1




                  @FumbleFingers: I lack (the) motivation. :) But all is a shape-shifter.
                  – Tᴚoɯɐuo
                  2 days ago








                • 1




                  @Alexander Kosubek: And you would be wrong to use the article. The money is an alternative to the barter is not grammatical in English.
                  – Tᴚoɯɐuo
                  yesterday




















                • Per comment to @Andrew's answer, and noting that even All water in the watering hole dries up during the summer dry season is "more or less" okay without the article, it's not obvious to me that there's a "complete" explanation here.
                  – FumbleFingers
                  2 days ago










                • @FumbleFingers: You wouldn't say "I drank all water in the glass." But you might say "I siphoned all water from the tank" and "All water in the beaker evaporates when you place it over the bunsen burner". Since you bring it up, care to explain why?
                  – Tᴚoɯɐuo
                  2 days ago












                • I don't think I know how to explain why - but I kinda assumed you would, if you could be so motivated.
                  – FumbleFingers
                  2 days ago






                • 1




                  @FumbleFingers: I lack (the) motivation. :) But all is a shape-shifter.
                  – Tᴚoɯɐuo
                  2 days ago








                • 1




                  @Alexander Kosubek: And you would be wrong to use the article. The money is an alternative to the barter is not grammatical in English.
                  – Tᴚoɯɐuo
                  yesterday


















                Per comment to @Andrew's answer, and noting that even All water in the watering hole dries up during the summer dry season is "more or less" okay without the article, it's not obvious to me that there's a "complete" explanation here.
                – FumbleFingers
                2 days ago




                Per comment to @Andrew's answer, and noting that even All water in the watering hole dries up during the summer dry season is "more or less" okay without the article, it's not obvious to me that there's a "complete" explanation here.
                – FumbleFingers
                2 days ago












                @FumbleFingers: You wouldn't say "I drank all water in the glass." But you might say "I siphoned all water from the tank" and "All water in the beaker evaporates when you place it over the bunsen burner". Since you bring it up, care to explain why?
                – Tᴚoɯɐuo
                2 days ago






                @FumbleFingers: You wouldn't say "I drank all water in the glass." But you might say "I siphoned all water from the tank" and "All water in the beaker evaporates when you place it over the bunsen burner". Since you bring it up, care to explain why?
                – Tᴚoɯɐuo
                2 days ago














                I don't think I know how to explain why - but I kinda assumed you would, if you could be so motivated.
                – FumbleFingers
                2 days ago




                I don't think I know how to explain why - but I kinda assumed you would, if you could be so motivated.
                – FumbleFingers
                2 days ago




                1




                1




                @FumbleFingers: I lack (the) motivation. :) But all is a shape-shifter.
                – Tᴚoɯɐuo
                2 days ago






                @FumbleFingers: I lack (the) motivation. :) But all is a shape-shifter.
                – Tᴚoɯɐuo
                2 days ago






                1




                1




                @Alexander Kosubek: And you would be wrong to use the article. The money is an alternative to the barter is not grammatical in English.
                – Tᴚoɯɐuo
                yesterday






                @Alexander Kosubek: And you would be wrong to use the article. The money is an alternative to the barter is not grammatical in English.
                – Tᴚoɯɐuo
                yesterday












                up vote
                4
                down vote













                I don't know what book told you that, but it's not the truth.1



                Fact is, there are several reasons we might use the definite article. Macmillan (definition 1b) says:




                used when you are referring to familiar things that people deal with regularly



                I looked up at the ceiling; suddenly all the lights went out




                Many familiar adages and expressions use the definite article even though they talk about things in general. Consider:




                • The lion is king of the jungle.

                • Top of the morning to you!

                • It hit me right between the eyes.

                • Religion is the opiate of the masses.

                • All the news that's fit to print.




                1See what I did there?






                share|improve this answer

























                  up vote
                  4
                  down vote













                  I don't know what book told you that, but it's not the truth.1



                  Fact is, there are several reasons we might use the definite article. Macmillan (definition 1b) says:




                  used when you are referring to familiar things that people deal with regularly



                  I looked up at the ceiling; suddenly all the lights went out




                  Many familiar adages and expressions use the definite article even though they talk about things in general. Consider:




                  • The lion is king of the jungle.

                  • Top of the morning to you!

                  • It hit me right between the eyes.

                  • Religion is the opiate of the masses.

                  • All the news that's fit to print.




                  1See what I did there?






                  share|improve this answer























                    up vote
                    4
                    down vote










                    up vote
                    4
                    down vote









                    I don't know what book told you that, but it's not the truth.1



                    Fact is, there are several reasons we might use the definite article. Macmillan (definition 1b) says:




                    used when you are referring to familiar things that people deal with regularly



                    I looked up at the ceiling; suddenly all the lights went out




                    Many familiar adages and expressions use the definite article even though they talk about things in general. Consider:




                    • The lion is king of the jungle.

                    • Top of the morning to you!

                    • It hit me right between the eyes.

                    • Religion is the opiate of the masses.

                    • All the news that's fit to print.




                    1See what I did there?






                    share|improve this answer












                    I don't know what book told you that, but it's not the truth.1



                    Fact is, there are several reasons we might use the definite article. Macmillan (definition 1b) says:




                    used when you are referring to familiar things that people deal with regularly



                    I looked up at the ceiling; suddenly all the lights went out




                    Many familiar adages and expressions use the definite article even though they talk about things in general. Consider:




                    • The lion is king of the jungle.

                    • Top of the morning to you!

                    • It hit me right between the eyes.

                    • Religion is the opiate of the masses.

                    • All the news that's fit to print.




                    1See what I did there?







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered 2 days ago









                    J.R.

                    96.8k8126242




                    96.8k8126242






















                        up vote
                        3
                        down vote













                        Ditto Andrew's excellent answer, let me just add:



                        Don't get confused by the difference between how something is in the real world, and how it is grammatically.



                        Yes, in real life, "all the money in the world" is, well, all the money that exists. Logically, you might say that it's the same as "money" as a general concept. But GRAMMATICALLY, "all the money in the world" is NOT all money that exists, it's a specific set of money, namely, the money that is "in the world". While in real life that may be all money, grammatically it is not.






                        share|improve this answer

























                          up vote
                          3
                          down vote













                          Ditto Andrew's excellent answer, let me just add:



                          Don't get confused by the difference between how something is in the real world, and how it is grammatically.



                          Yes, in real life, "all the money in the world" is, well, all the money that exists. Logically, you might say that it's the same as "money" as a general concept. But GRAMMATICALLY, "all the money in the world" is NOT all money that exists, it's a specific set of money, namely, the money that is "in the world". While in real life that may be all money, grammatically it is not.






                          share|improve this answer























                            up vote
                            3
                            down vote










                            up vote
                            3
                            down vote









                            Ditto Andrew's excellent answer, let me just add:



                            Don't get confused by the difference between how something is in the real world, and how it is grammatically.



                            Yes, in real life, "all the money in the world" is, well, all the money that exists. Logically, you might say that it's the same as "money" as a general concept. But GRAMMATICALLY, "all the money in the world" is NOT all money that exists, it's a specific set of money, namely, the money that is "in the world". While in real life that may be all money, grammatically it is not.






                            share|improve this answer












                            Ditto Andrew's excellent answer, let me just add:



                            Don't get confused by the difference between how something is in the real world, and how it is grammatically.



                            Yes, in real life, "all the money in the world" is, well, all the money that exists. Logically, you might say that it's the same as "money" as a general concept. But GRAMMATICALLY, "all the money in the world" is NOT all money that exists, it's a specific set of money, namely, the money that is "in the world". While in real life that may be all money, grammatically it is not.







                            share|improve this answer












                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer










                            answered 2 days ago









                            Jay

                            45.4k14090




                            45.4k14090






















                                up vote
                                2
                                down vote













                                The big, fancy language scholar term for this particular use of the definite article, "the", is "modadic"—the as in the one and only.



                                From your example, rephrased:




                                There is only one collection of all money in the one and only world.




                                Reference:




                                8. Monadic



                                ("One of a Kind" or "Unique")




                                The Article






                                share|improve this answer










                                New contributor




                                Jesse Steele is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                Check out our Code of Conduct.


















                                • I'm gonna upvote this one purely because you didn't include the "optional" article in There is only one collection of all the money in the one and only world, even though you didn't specifically draw attention to that yourself!
                                  – FumbleFingers
                                  2 days ago






                                • 1




                                  I'm so glad you noticed that! I was mindful of not wanting to use a circular definition with the first "one", with the one and only "the" being qualified enough not to be. ;-)
                                  – Jesse Steele
                                  2 days ago















                                up vote
                                2
                                down vote













                                The big, fancy language scholar term for this particular use of the definite article, "the", is "modadic"—the as in the one and only.



                                From your example, rephrased:




                                There is only one collection of all money in the one and only world.




                                Reference:




                                8. Monadic



                                ("One of a Kind" or "Unique")




                                The Article






                                share|improve this answer










                                New contributor




                                Jesse Steele is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                Check out our Code of Conduct.


















                                • I'm gonna upvote this one purely because you didn't include the "optional" article in There is only one collection of all the money in the one and only world, even though you didn't specifically draw attention to that yourself!
                                  – FumbleFingers
                                  2 days ago






                                • 1




                                  I'm so glad you noticed that! I was mindful of not wanting to use a circular definition with the first "one", with the one and only "the" being qualified enough not to be. ;-)
                                  – Jesse Steele
                                  2 days ago













                                up vote
                                2
                                down vote










                                up vote
                                2
                                down vote









                                The big, fancy language scholar term for this particular use of the definite article, "the", is "modadic"—the as in the one and only.



                                From your example, rephrased:




                                There is only one collection of all money in the one and only world.




                                Reference:




                                8. Monadic



                                ("One of a Kind" or "Unique")




                                The Article






                                share|improve this answer










                                New contributor




                                Jesse Steele is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                The big, fancy language scholar term for this particular use of the definite article, "the", is "modadic"—the as in the one and only.



                                From your example, rephrased:




                                There is only one collection of all money in the one and only world.




                                Reference:




                                8. Monadic



                                ("One of a Kind" or "Unique")




                                The Article







                                share|improve this answer










                                New contributor




                                Jesse Steele is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                share|improve this answer



                                share|improve this answer








                                edited 2 days ago





















                                New contributor




                                Jesse Steele is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                answered 2 days ago









                                Jesse Steele

                                1214




                                1214




                                New contributor




                                Jesse Steele is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                Check out our Code of Conduct.





                                New contributor





                                Jesse Steele is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                Check out our Code of Conduct.






                                Jesse Steele is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                Check out our Code of Conduct.












                                • I'm gonna upvote this one purely because you didn't include the "optional" article in There is only one collection of all the money in the one and only world, even though you didn't specifically draw attention to that yourself!
                                  – FumbleFingers
                                  2 days ago






                                • 1




                                  I'm so glad you noticed that! I was mindful of not wanting to use a circular definition with the first "one", with the one and only "the" being qualified enough not to be. ;-)
                                  – Jesse Steele
                                  2 days ago


















                                • I'm gonna upvote this one purely because you didn't include the "optional" article in There is only one collection of all the money in the one and only world, even though you didn't specifically draw attention to that yourself!
                                  – FumbleFingers
                                  2 days ago






                                • 1




                                  I'm so glad you noticed that! I was mindful of not wanting to use a circular definition with the first "one", with the one and only "the" being qualified enough not to be. ;-)
                                  – Jesse Steele
                                  2 days ago
















                                I'm gonna upvote this one purely because you didn't include the "optional" article in There is only one collection of all the money in the one and only world, even though you didn't specifically draw attention to that yourself!
                                – FumbleFingers
                                2 days ago




                                I'm gonna upvote this one purely because you didn't include the "optional" article in There is only one collection of all the money in the one and only world, even though you didn't specifically draw attention to that yourself!
                                – FumbleFingers
                                2 days ago




                                1




                                1




                                I'm so glad you noticed that! I was mindful of not wanting to use a circular definition with the first "one", with the one and only "the" being qualified enough not to be. ;-)
                                – Jesse Steele
                                2 days ago




                                I'm so glad you noticed that! I was mindful of not wanting to use a circular definition with the first "one", with the one and only "the" being qualified enough not to be. ;-)
                                – Jesse Steele
                                2 days ago










                                up vote
                                1
                                down vote













                                All the money in the world would not make you happy.



                                We only have one specific world, and all the money in it is very specific.



                                Having money in the bank is a good thing, if its yours. [non-specific]



                                And: The money I have in the bank is none of your business. [specific]



                                Please note: for certain expressions such as money in the bank, a the is used with bank.






                                share|improve this answer

























                                  up vote
                                  1
                                  down vote













                                  All the money in the world would not make you happy.



                                  We only have one specific world, and all the money in it is very specific.



                                  Having money in the bank is a good thing, if its yours. [non-specific]



                                  And: The money I have in the bank is none of your business. [specific]



                                  Please note: for certain expressions such as money in the bank, a the is used with bank.






                                  share|improve this answer























                                    up vote
                                    1
                                    down vote










                                    up vote
                                    1
                                    down vote









                                    All the money in the world would not make you happy.



                                    We only have one specific world, and all the money in it is very specific.



                                    Having money in the bank is a good thing, if its yours. [non-specific]



                                    And: The money I have in the bank is none of your business. [specific]



                                    Please note: for certain expressions such as money in the bank, a the is used with bank.






                                    share|improve this answer












                                    All the money in the world would not make you happy.



                                    We only have one specific world, and all the money in it is very specific.



                                    Having money in the bank is a good thing, if its yours. [non-specific]



                                    And: The money I have in the bank is none of your business. [specific]



                                    Please note: for certain expressions such as money in the bank, a the is used with bank.







                                    share|improve this answer












                                    share|improve this answer



                                    share|improve this answer










                                    answered 2 days ago









                                    Lambie

                                    14.2k1331




                                    14.2k1331






















                                        up vote
                                        1
                                        down vote













                                        There is a word elided which will make parsing the phrase easier:




                                        All of the money in the world




                                        "Of money" is wrong for different reasons -- the preposition requires more than just a bare noun.






                                        share|improve this answer





















                                        • This is the point I was hoping to see. As with most English, we've munged it up so it doesn't follow our own quidelines by omitting a word.
                                          – Scott Baker
                                          10 hours ago















                                        up vote
                                        1
                                        down vote













                                        There is a word elided which will make parsing the phrase easier:




                                        All of the money in the world




                                        "Of money" is wrong for different reasons -- the preposition requires more than just a bare noun.






                                        share|improve this answer





















                                        • This is the point I was hoping to see. As with most English, we've munged it up so it doesn't follow our own quidelines by omitting a word.
                                          – Scott Baker
                                          10 hours ago













                                        up vote
                                        1
                                        down vote










                                        up vote
                                        1
                                        down vote









                                        There is a word elided which will make parsing the phrase easier:




                                        All of the money in the world




                                        "Of money" is wrong for different reasons -- the preposition requires more than just a bare noun.






                                        share|improve this answer












                                        There is a word elided which will make parsing the phrase easier:




                                        All of the money in the world




                                        "Of money" is wrong for different reasons -- the preposition requires more than just a bare noun.







                                        share|improve this answer












                                        share|improve this answer



                                        share|improve this answer










                                        answered 2 days ago









                                        arp

                                        34617




                                        34617












                                        • This is the point I was hoping to see. As with most English, we've munged it up so it doesn't follow our own quidelines by omitting a word.
                                          – Scott Baker
                                          10 hours ago


















                                        • This is the point I was hoping to see. As with most English, we've munged it up so it doesn't follow our own quidelines by omitting a word.
                                          – Scott Baker
                                          10 hours ago
















                                        This is the point I was hoping to see. As with most English, we've munged it up so it doesn't follow our own quidelines by omitting a word.
                                        – Scott Baker
                                        10 hours ago




                                        This is the point I was hoping to see. As with most English, we've munged it up so it doesn't follow our own quidelines by omitting a word.
                                        – Scott Baker
                                        10 hours ago


















                                         

                                        draft saved


                                        draft discarded



















































                                         


                                        draft saved


                                        draft discarded














                                        StackExchange.ready(
                                        function () {
                                        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f186691%2fwhy-does-money-take-the-in-all-the-money-in-the-world%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                        }
                                        );

                                        Post as a guest















                                        Required, but never shown





















































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown

































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Popular posts from this blog

                                        Quarter-circle Tiles

                                        build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

                                        Mont Emei