$lim_{ntoinfty} e^{-n} sum_{k=0}^{n} frac{n^k}{k!} = frac{1}{2}$ - basic methods
up vote
13
down vote
favorite
Prove that $$limlimits_{ntoinfty} e^{-n} sum_{k=0}^{n} frac{n^k}{k!} = frac{1}{2}$$
This problem appeared on MSE many times, but each time it was solved using Poisson distribution or lots of integrals. I am wondering, is there any way to prove it using some basic properties of limits (their arithmetics, squeeze theorem etc.), definition of $e^x$ as $limlimits_{ntoinfty}(1+frac{x}{n})^n$, basic limits with $e$, binomial expansion and logarithms, but without using integrals, series, Stirling formula, asymptotics, Taylor series?
This problem was given to me by my mathematical analysis teacher, but it's not a homework, just additional problem to think on. My teacher claims it can be solved with knowledge introduced on lectures so far, which is not much, mainly things mentioned above. Of course, I can use theorems not mentioned on the lectures, but then I have to prove them, and again, with the baisc knowledge. I've been thinking about it for a few days and couldn't do any major progress in my attempts.
The answer by Sangchul Lee was written for the first version of this question which was not filled with details, for what I am sorry, and hence his answer does not answer my question.
calculus real-analysis limits eulers-constant
This question has an open bounty worth +50
reputation from user128409235 ending in 3 days.
This question has not received enough attention.
add a comment |
up vote
13
down vote
favorite
Prove that $$limlimits_{ntoinfty} e^{-n} sum_{k=0}^{n} frac{n^k}{k!} = frac{1}{2}$$
This problem appeared on MSE many times, but each time it was solved using Poisson distribution or lots of integrals. I am wondering, is there any way to prove it using some basic properties of limits (their arithmetics, squeeze theorem etc.), definition of $e^x$ as $limlimits_{ntoinfty}(1+frac{x}{n})^n$, basic limits with $e$, binomial expansion and logarithms, but without using integrals, series, Stirling formula, asymptotics, Taylor series?
This problem was given to me by my mathematical analysis teacher, but it's not a homework, just additional problem to think on. My teacher claims it can be solved with knowledge introduced on lectures so far, which is not much, mainly things mentioned above. Of course, I can use theorems not mentioned on the lectures, but then I have to prove them, and again, with the baisc knowledge. I've been thinking about it for a few days and couldn't do any major progress in my attempts.
The answer by Sangchul Lee was written for the first version of this question which was not filled with details, for what I am sorry, and hence his answer does not answer my question.
calculus real-analysis limits eulers-constant
This question has an open bounty worth +50
reputation from user128409235 ending in 3 days.
This question has not received enough attention.
Previous times this question has been asked: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2603315/…, math.stackexchange.com/questions/160248/… . I'm not flagging as duplicate because the question specifically asks for basic methods.
– Michael Lugo
Nov 15 at 23:42
Interestingly, the general term $n^k/k!$ is maximum when $k=n$. And by some magic, the sum "before" equals the sum "after" (asymptotically).
– Yves Daoust
Nov 18 at 13:12
Without an algebraic miracle, I do not think there is a simple and rigorous solution. My rationale is that any solution should demonstrate the understanding on the concentration behavior of the function $k mapsto frac{n^k}{k!}e^{-n}$ around $k = n$. Both the probabilistic solution (using Poisson distribution + CLT) and the solution using integral show this. My solution is also based on this kind of observation.
– Sangchul Lee
Nov 18 at 19:16
add a comment |
up vote
13
down vote
favorite
up vote
13
down vote
favorite
Prove that $$limlimits_{ntoinfty} e^{-n} sum_{k=0}^{n} frac{n^k}{k!} = frac{1}{2}$$
This problem appeared on MSE many times, but each time it was solved using Poisson distribution or lots of integrals. I am wondering, is there any way to prove it using some basic properties of limits (their arithmetics, squeeze theorem etc.), definition of $e^x$ as $limlimits_{ntoinfty}(1+frac{x}{n})^n$, basic limits with $e$, binomial expansion and logarithms, but without using integrals, series, Stirling formula, asymptotics, Taylor series?
This problem was given to me by my mathematical analysis teacher, but it's not a homework, just additional problem to think on. My teacher claims it can be solved with knowledge introduced on lectures so far, which is not much, mainly things mentioned above. Of course, I can use theorems not mentioned on the lectures, but then I have to prove them, and again, with the baisc knowledge. I've been thinking about it for a few days and couldn't do any major progress in my attempts.
The answer by Sangchul Lee was written for the first version of this question which was not filled with details, for what I am sorry, and hence his answer does not answer my question.
calculus real-analysis limits eulers-constant
Prove that $$limlimits_{ntoinfty} e^{-n} sum_{k=0}^{n} frac{n^k}{k!} = frac{1}{2}$$
This problem appeared on MSE many times, but each time it was solved using Poisson distribution or lots of integrals. I am wondering, is there any way to prove it using some basic properties of limits (their arithmetics, squeeze theorem etc.), definition of $e^x$ as $limlimits_{ntoinfty}(1+frac{x}{n})^n$, basic limits with $e$, binomial expansion and logarithms, but without using integrals, series, Stirling formula, asymptotics, Taylor series?
This problem was given to me by my mathematical analysis teacher, but it's not a homework, just additional problem to think on. My teacher claims it can be solved with knowledge introduced on lectures so far, which is not much, mainly things mentioned above. Of course, I can use theorems not mentioned on the lectures, but then I have to prove them, and again, with the baisc knowledge. I've been thinking about it for a few days and couldn't do any major progress in my attempts.
The answer by Sangchul Lee was written for the first version of this question which was not filled with details, for what I am sorry, and hence his answer does not answer my question.
calculus real-analysis limits eulers-constant
calculus real-analysis limits eulers-constant
edited yesterday
leonbloy
39.6k645105
39.6k645105
asked Nov 15 at 22:43
user128409235
471314
471314
This question has an open bounty worth +50
reputation from user128409235 ending in 3 days.
This question has not received enough attention.
This question has an open bounty worth +50
reputation from user128409235 ending in 3 days.
This question has not received enough attention.
Previous times this question has been asked: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2603315/…, math.stackexchange.com/questions/160248/… . I'm not flagging as duplicate because the question specifically asks for basic methods.
– Michael Lugo
Nov 15 at 23:42
Interestingly, the general term $n^k/k!$ is maximum when $k=n$. And by some magic, the sum "before" equals the sum "after" (asymptotically).
– Yves Daoust
Nov 18 at 13:12
Without an algebraic miracle, I do not think there is a simple and rigorous solution. My rationale is that any solution should demonstrate the understanding on the concentration behavior of the function $k mapsto frac{n^k}{k!}e^{-n}$ around $k = n$. Both the probabilistic solution (using Poisson distribution + CLT) and the solution using integral show this. My solution is also based on this kind of observation.
– Sangchul Lee
Nov 18 at 19:16
add a comment |
Previous times this question has been asked: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2603315/…, math.stackexchange.com/questions/160248/… . I'm not flagging as duplicate because the question specifically asks for basic methods.
– Michael Lugo
Nov 15 at 23:42
Interestingly, the general term $n^k/k!$ is maximum when $k=n$. And by some magic, the sum "before" equals the sum "after" (asymptotically).
– Yves Daoust
Nov 18 at 13:12
Without an algebraic miracle, I do not think there is a simple and rigorous solution. My rationale is that any solution should demonstrate the understanding on the concentration behavior of the function $k mapsto frac{n^k}{k!}e^{-n}$ around $k = n$. Both the probabilistic solution (using Poisson distribution + CLT) and the solution using integral show this. My solution is also based on this kind of observation.
– Sangchul Lee
Nov 18 at 19:16
Previous times this question has been asked: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2603315/…, math.stackexchange.com/questions/160248/… . I'm not flagging as duplicate because the question specifically asks for basic methods.
– Michael Lugo
Nov 15 at 23:42
Previous times this question has been asked: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2603315/…, math.stackexchange.com/questions/160248/… . I'm not flagging as duplicate because the question specifically asks for basic methods.
– Michael Lugo
Nov 15 at 23:42
Interestingly, the general term $n^k/k!$ is maximum when $k=n$. And by some magic, the sum "before" equals the sum "after" (asymptotically).
– Yves Daoust
Nov 18 at 13:12
Interestingly, the general term $n^k/k!$ is maximum when $k=n$. And by some magic, the sum "before" equals the sum "after" (asymptotically).
– Yves Daoust
Nov 18 at 13:12
Without an algebraic miracle, I do not think there is a simple and rigorous solution. My rationale is that any solution should demonstrate the understanding on the concentration behavior of the function $k mapsto frac{n^k}{k!}e^{-n}$ around $k = n$. Both the probabilistic solution (using Poisson distribution + CLT) and the solution using integral show this. My solution is also based on this kind of observation.
– Sangchul Lee
Nov 18 at 19:16
Without an algebraic miracle, I do not think there is a simple and rigorous solution. My rationale is that any solution should demonstrate the understanding on the concentration behavior of the function $k mapsto frac{n^k}{k!}e^{-n}$ around $k = n$. Both the probabilistic solution (using Poisson distribution + CLT) and the solution using integral show this. My solution is also based on this kind of observation.
– Sangchul Lee
Nov 18 at 19:16
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
22
down vote
Heuristic argument. Although far from being rigorous, one can provide a heuristic computation which explains why we expect the answer to be $frac{1}{2}$. Notice that
$$ frac{n^{n+j}/(n+j)!}{n^n / n!} = begin{cases}
prod_{k=1}^{j} frac{n}{n+k}, & j geq 1 \
1, & j = 0, -1 \
prod_{k=1}^{-j-1} frac{n-k}{n}, & j leq -2
end{cases}
$$
In any of cases, taking logarithm and applying the approximation $log(1+x) approx x$ shows that the above quantity is approximately $e^{-j^2/2n}$. So
$$
e^{-n} sum_{k=0}^{n} frac{n^k}{k!}
= frac{sum_{j=-n}^{0} frac{n!}{n^n sqrt{n}} frac{n^{n+j}}{(n+j)!} }{sum_{j=-n}^{infty} frac{n!}{n^n sqrt{n}}frac{n^{n+j}}{(n+j)!} }
approx frac{sum_{j=-n}^{0} e^{-(j/sqrt{n})^2/2} frac{1}{sqrt{n}} }{sum_{j=-n}^{infty} e^{-(j/sqrt{n})^2/2} frac{1}{sqrt{n}} }
approx frac{int_{-infty}^{0} e^{-x^2/2} , dx}{int_{-infty}^{infty} e^{-x^2/2} , dx}
= frac{1}{2}.
$$
Every solution that I know is more or less a rigorous realization of this kind of observation, and so, it is either involved or requiring extra knowledge.
Elementary proof. Define $A_n$, $B_n$ and $C_n$ by
$$ A_n := e^{-n} sum_{k=0}^{n} frac{n^k}{k!}, qquad B_n := e^{-n} sum_{k=n+1}^{infty} frac{n^k}{k!}, qquad C_n = frac{n^{n} e^{-n}}{n!}. $$
From the Taylor expansion of the exponential function, we know that $A_n + B_n = 1$. In order to show the desired convergence, it suffices to show that the following claim holds.
Claim. $A_n/B_n to 1$ as $ntoinfty$.
Indeed, once this is proved, then both $A_n$ and $B_n$ converge to $frac{1}{2}$ as $ntoinfty$.
Proof of Claim. Using the substitution $k = n-j$ followed by $p = j-1$, one may write
begin{align*}
frac{A_n}{C_n}
&= sum_{j=0}^{n} frac{n!}{(n-j)!n^j}
= 2 + sum_{p=1}^{n-1} prod_{l=1}^{p} left( 1 - frac{l}{n} right).
end{align*}
Similarly, applying the substitution $k = n+p$, one may write
begin{align*}
frac{B_n}{C_n}
&= sum_{p=1}^{infty} frac{n!n^p}{(n+p)!}
= sum_{p=1}^{infty} prod_{l=1}^{p} left( frac{1}{1 + frac{l}{n}} right).
end{align*}
1. Estimation of leading sums. Fix $alpha in left( 0, frac{1}{3} right)$ and set $N = N(alpha) = leftlceil n^{(1+alpha)/2} rightrceil$. Then using the asymptotic formula $1+x = e^{x+mathcal{O}(x^2)}$ as $x to 0$, for $1 leq p leq N$ we have
$$ prod_{l=1}^{p} left( 1 - frac{l}{n} right)
= expleft{ -frac{p^2}{2n} + mathcal{O}left( n^{-(1-3alpha)/2} right) right}
= prod_{l=1}^{p} left( frac{1}{1 + frac{l}{n}} right). $$
In particular, there exists a constant $C > 0$, depending only on $alpha$, such that
$$ maxBigg{ prod_{l=1}^{N} left( 1 - frac{l}{n} right), prod_{l=1}^{N} left( frac{1}{1 + frac{l}{n}} right) Bigg} leq C e^{-frac{1}{2}n^{alpha}}. $$
2. Estimation of tail sums. In this time, consider $p > N$. Then we have
$$ prod_{l=1}^{p} left( 1 - frac{l}{n} right)
leq C e^{-frac{1}{2}n^{alpha}} left( 1 - frac{N}{n} right)^{p-N}
quad text{and} quad
prod_{l=1}^{p} left( frac{1}{1 + frac{l}{n}} right)
leq C e^{-frac{1}{2}n^{alpha}} left( frac{1}{1 + frac{N}{n}} right)^{p-N}. $$
So the tail sum for $A_n/C_n$ can be bounded from above by
$$ sum_{p=N+1}^{n-1} prod_{l=1}^{p} left( 1 - frac{l}{n} right)
leq Ce^{-frac{1}{2}n^{alpha}} sum_{k = 0}^{infty} left( 1 - frac{N}{n} right)^k
leq frac{Cn}{N} e^{-frac{1}{2}n^{alpha}}
leq Cn^{(1-alpha)/2} e^{-frac{1}{2}n^{alpha}}, $$
and likewise,
$$ sum_{p=N+1}^{infty} prod_{l=1}^{p} left( frac{1}{1 + frac{l}{n}} right)
leq Ce^{-frac{1}{2}n^{alpha}} sum_{k = 0}^{infty} left( 1 - frac{N}{N+n} right)^k
leq frac{2Cn}{N} e^{-frac{1}{2}n^{alpha}}
leq 2Cn^{(1-alpha)/2} e^{-frac{1}{2}n^{alpha}}. $$
3. Conclusion. Combining altogether,
$$ frac{A_n}{B_n} = frac{left( 1 + o(1) right) sum_{p=1}^{N} e^{-frac{p^2}{2n}} + mathcal{O}(1)}{left( 1 + o(1) right) sum_{p=1}^{N} e^{-frac{p^2}{2n}} + o(1)}, $$
which can be easily shown to converge to $1$ as $ntoinfty$, since $sum_{p=1}^{N} e^{-frac{p^2}{2n}} geq sqrt{n} , e^{-1/2} to infty$ as $ntoinfty$. (In fact, this sum is $(1+o(1))sqrt{pi n/2}$ as $ntoinfty$.)
Thank you for your answer! I've filled my question with more details to be more specific on the kind of solution I am looking form. Unfortunately, yours doesn't fall in this category, but for your efforts, I am giving you +1.
– user128409235
Nov 18 at 9:02
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
22
down vote
Heuristic argument. Although far from being rigorous, one can provide a heuristic computation which explains why we expect the answer to be $frac{1}{2}$. Notice that
$$ frac{n^{n+j}/(n+j)!}{n^n / n!} = begin{cases}
prod_{k=1}^{j} frac{n}{n+k}, & j geq 1 \
1, & j = 0, -1 \
prod_{k=1}^{-j-1} frac{n-k}{n}, & j leq -2
end{cases}
$$
In any of cases, taking logarithm and applying the approximation $log(1+x) approx x$ shows that the above quantity is approximately $e^{-j^2/2n}$. So
$$
e^{-n} sum_{k=0}^{n} frac{n^k}{k!}
= frac{sum_{j=-n}^{0} frac{n!}{n^n sqrt{n}} frac{n^{n+j}}{(n+j)!} }{sum_{j=-n}^{infty} frac{n!}{n^n sqrt{n}}frac{n^{n+j}}{(n+j)!} }
approx frac{sum_{j=-n}^{0} e^{-(j/sqrt{n})^2/2} frac{1}{sqrt{n}} }{sum_{j=-n}^{infty} e^{-(j/sqrt{n})^2/2} frac{1}{sqrt{n}} }
approx frac{int_{-infty}^{0} e^{-x^2/2} , dx}{int_{-infty}^{infty} e^{-x^2/2} , dx}
= frac{1}{2}.
$$
Every solution that I know is more or less a rigorous realization of this kind of observation, and so, it is either involved or requiring extra knowledge.
Elementary proof. Define $A_n$, $B_n$ and $C_n$ by
$$ A_n := e^{-n} sum_{k=0}^{n} frac{n^k}{k!}, qquad B_n := e^{-n} sum_{k=n+1}^{infty} frac{n^k}{k!}, qquad C_n = frac{n^{n} e^{-n}}{n!}. $$
From the Taylor expansion of the exponential function, we know that $A_n + B_n = 1$. In order to show the desired convergence, it suffices to show that the following claim holds.
Claim. $A_n/B_n to 1$ as $ntoinfty$.
Indeed, once this is proved, then both $A_n$ and $B_n$ converge to $frac{1}{2}$ as $ntoinfty$.
Proof of Claim. Using the substitution $k = n-j$ followed by $p = j-1$, one may write
begin{align*}
frac{A_n}{C_n}
&= sum_{j=0}^{n} frac{n!}{(n-j)!n^j}
= 2 + sum_{p=1}^{n-1} prod_{l=1}^{p} left( 1 - frac{l}{n} right).
end{align*}
Similarly, applying the substitution $k = n+p$, one may write
begin{align*}
frac{B_n}{C_n}
&= sum_{p=1}^{infty} frac{n!n^p}{(n+p)!}
= sum_{p=1}^{infty} prod_{l=1}^{p} left( frac{1}{1 + frac{l}{n}} right).
end{align*}
1. Estimation of leading sums. Fix $alpha in left( 0, frac{1}{3} right)$ and set $N = N(alpha) = leftlceil n^{(1+alpha)/2} rightrceil$. Then using the asymptotic formula $1+x = e^{x+mathcal{O}(x^2)}$ as $x to 0$, for $1 leq p leq N$ we have
$$ prod_{l=1}^{p} left( 1 - frac{l}{n} right)
= expleft{ -frac{p^2}{2n} + mathcal{O}left( n^{-(1-3alpha)/2} right) right}
= prod_{l=1}^{p} left( frac{1}{1 + frac{l}{n}} right). $$
In particular, there exists a constant $C > 0$, depending only on $alpha$, such that
$$ maxBigg{ prod_{l=1}^{N} left( 1 - frac{l}{n} right), prod_{l=1}^{N} left( frac{1}{1 + frac{l}{n}} right) Bigg} leq C e^{-frac{1}{2}n^{alpha}}. $$
2. Estimation of tail sums. In this time, consider $p > N$. Then we have
$$ prod_{l=1}^{p} left( 1 - frac{l}{n} right)
leq C e^{-frac{1}{2}n^{alpha}} left( 1 - frac{N}{n} right)^{p-N}
quad text{and} quad
prod_{l=1}^{p} left( frac{1}{1 + frac{l}{n}} right)
leq C e^{-frac{1}{2}n^{alpha}} left( frac{1}{1 + frac{N}{n}} right)^{p-N}. $$
So the tail sum for $A_n/C_n$ can be bounded from above by
$$ sum_{p=N+1}^{n-1} prod_{l=1}^{p} left( 1 - frac{l}{n} right)
leq Ce^{-frac{1}{2}n^{alpha}} sum_{k = 0}^{infty} left( 1 - frac{N}{n} right)^k
leq frac{Cn}{N} e^{-frac{1}{2}n^{alpha}}
leq Cn^{(1-alpha)/2} e^{-frac{1}{2}n^{alpha}}, $$
and likewise,
$$ sum_{p=N+1}^{infty} prod_{l=1}^{p} left( frac{1}{1 + frac{l}{n}} right)
leq Ce^{-frac{1}{2}n^{alpha}} sum_{k = 0}^{infty} left( 1 - frac{N}{N+n} right)^k
leq frac{2Cn}{N} e^{-frac{1}{2}n^{alpha}}
leq 2Cn^{(1-alpha)/2} e^{-frac{1}{2}n^{alpha}}. $$
3. Conclusion. Combining altogether,
$$ frac{A_n}{B_n} = frac{left( 1 + o(1) right) sum_{p=1}^{N} e^{-frac{p^2}{2n}} + mathcal{O}(1)}{left( 1 + o(1) right) sum_{p=1}^{N} e^{-frac{p^2}{2n}} + o(1)}, $$
which can be easily shown to converge to $1$ as $ntoinfty$, since $sum_{p=1}^{N} e^{-frac{p^2}{2n}} geq sqrt{n} , e^{-1/2} to infty$ as $ntoinfty$. (In fact, this sum is $(1+o(1))sqrt{pi n/2}$ as $ntoinfty$.)
Thank you for your answer! I've filled my question with more details to be more specific on the kind of solution I am looking form. Unfortunately, yours doesn't fall in this category, but for your efforts, I am giving you +1.
– user128409235
Nov 18 at 9:02
add a comment |
up vote
22
down vote
Heuristic argument. Although far from being rigorous, one can provide a heuristic computation which explains why we expect the answer to be $frac{1}{2}$. Notice that
$$ frac{n^{n+j}/(n+j)!}{n^n / n!} = begin{cases}
prod_{k=1}^{j} frac{n}{n+k}, & j geq 1 \
1, & j = 0, -1 \
prod_{k=1}^{-j-1} frac{n-k}{n}, & j leq -2
end{cases}
$$
In any of cases, taking logarithm and applying the approximation $log(1+x) approx x$ shows that the above quantity is approximately $e^{-j^2/2n}$. So
$$
e^{-n} sum_{k=0}^{n} frac{n^k}{k!}
= frac{sum_{j=-n}^{0} frac{n!}{n^n sqrt{n}} frac{n^{n+j}}{(n+j)!} }{sum_{j=-n}^{infty} frac{n!}{n^n sqrt{n}}frac{n^{n+j}}{(n+j)!} }
approx frac{sum_{j=-n}^{0} e^{-(j/sqrt{n})^2/2} frac{1}{sqrt{n}} }{sum_{j=-n}^{infty} e^{-(j/sqrt{n})^2/2} frac{1}{sqrt{n}} }
approx frac{int_{-infty}^{0} e^{-x^2/2} , dx}{int_{-infty}^{infty} e^{-x^2/2} , dx}
= frac{1}{2}.
$$
Every solution that I know is more or less a rigorous realization of this kind of observation, and so, it is either involved or requiring extra knowledge.
Elementary proof. Define $A_n$, $B_n$ and $C_n$ by
$$ A_n := e^{-n} sum_{k=0}^{n} frac{n^k}{k!}, qquad B_n := e^{-n} sum_{k=n+1}^{infty} frac{n^k}{k!}, qquad C_n = frac{n^{n} e^{-n}}{n!}. $$
From the Taylor expansion of the exponential function, we know that $A_n + B_n = 1$. In order to show the desired convergence, it suffices to show that the following claim holds.
Claim. $A_n/B_n to 1$ as $ntoinfty$.
Indeed, once this is proved, then both $A_n$ and $B_n$ converge to $frac{1}{2}$ as $ntoinfty$.
Proof of Claim. Using the substitution $k = n-j$ followed by $p = j-1$, one may write
begin{align*}
frac{A_n}{C_n}
&= sum_{j=0}^{n} frac{n!}{(n-j)!n^j}
= 2 + sum_{p=1}^{n-1} prod_{l=1}^{p} left( 1 - frac{l}{n} right).
end{align*}
Similarly, applying the substitution $k = n+p$, one may write
begin{align*}
frac{B_n}{C_n}
&= sum_{p=1}^{infty} frac{n!n^p}{(n+p)!}
= sum_{p=1}^{infty} prod_{l=1}^{p} left( frac{1}{1 + frac{l}{n}} right).
end{align*}
1. Estimation of leading sums. Fix $alpha in left( 0, frac{1}{3} right)$ and set $N = N(alpha) = leftlceil n^{(1+alpha)/2} rightrceil$. Then using the asymptotic formula $1+x = e^{x+mathcal{O}(x^2)}$ as $x to 0$, for $1 leq p leq N$ we have
$$ prod_{l=1}^{p} left( 1 - frac{l}{n} right)
= expleft{ -frac{p^2}{2n} + mathcal{O}left( n^{-(1-3alpha)/2} right) right}
= prod_{l=1}^{p} left( frac{1}{1 + frac{l}{n}} right). $$
In particular, there exists a constant $C > 0$, depending only on $alpha$, such that
$$ maxBigg{ prod_{l=1}^{N} left( 1 - frac{l}{n} right), prod_{l=1}^{N} left( frac{1}{1 + frac{l}{n}} right) Bigg} leq C e^{-frac{1}{2}n^{alpha}}. $$
2. Estimation of tail sums. In this time, consider $p > N$. Then we have
$$ prod_{l=1}^{p} left( 1 - frac{l}{n} right)
leq C e^{-frac{1}{2}n^{alpha}} left( 1 - frac{N}{n} right)^{p-N}
quad text{and} quad
prod_{l=1}^{p} left( frac{1}{1 + frac{l}{n}} right)
leq C e^{-frac{1}{2}n^{alpha}} left( frac{1}{1 + frac{N}{n}} right)^{p-N}. $$
So the tail sum for $A_n/C_n$ can be bounded from above by
$$ sum_{p=N+1}^{n-1} prod_{l=1}^{p} left( 1 - frac{l}{n} right)
leq Ce^{-frac{1}{2}n^{alpha}} sum_{k = 0}^{infty} left( 1 - frac{N}{n} right)^k
leq frac{Cn}{N} e^{-frac{1}{2}n^{alpha}}
leq Cn^{(1-alpha)/2} e^{-frac{1}{2}n^{alpha}}, $$
and likewise,
$$ sum_{p=N+1}^{infty} prod_{l=1}^{p} left( frac{1}{1 + frac{l}{n}} right)
leq Ce^{-frac{1}{2}n^{alpha}} sum_{k = 0}^{infty} left( 1 - frac{N}{N+n} right)^k
leq frac{2Cn}{N} e^{-frac{1}{2}n^{alpha}}
leq 2Cn^{(1-alpha)/2} e^{-frac{1}{2}n^{alpha}}. $$
3. Conclusion. Combining altogether,
$$ frac{A_n}{B_n} = frac{left( 1 + o(1) right) sum_{p=1}^{N} e^{-frac{p^2}{2n}} + mathcal{O}(1)}{left( 1 + o(1) right) sum_{p=1}^{N} e^{-frac{p^2}{2n}} + o(1)}, $$
which can be easily shown to converge to $1$ as $ntoinfty$, since $sum_{p=1}^{N} e^{-frac{p^2}{2n}} geq sqrt{n} , e^{-1/2} to infty$ as $ntoinfty$. (In fact, this sum is $(1+o(1))sqrt{pi n/2}$ as $ntoinfty$.)
Thank you for your answer! I've filled my question with more details to be more specific on the kind of solution I am looking form. Unfortunately, yours doesn't fall in this category, but for your efforts, I am giving you +1.
– user128409235
Nov 18 at 9:02
add a comment |
up vote
22
down vote
up vote
22
down vote
Heuristic argument. Although far from being rigorous, one can provide a heuristic computation which explains why we expect the answer to be $frac{1}{2}$. Notice that
$$ frac{n^{n+j}/(n+j)!}{n^n / n!} = begin{cases}
prod_{k=1}^{j} frac{n}{n+k}, & j geq 1 \
1, & j = 0, -1 \
prod_{k=1}^{-j-1} frac{n-k}{n}, & j leq -2
end{cases}
$$
In any of cases, taking logarithm and applying the approximation $log(1+x) approx x$ shows that the above quantity is approximately $e^{-j^2/2n}$. So
$$
e^{-n} sum_{k=0}^{n} frac{n^k}{k!}
= frac{sum_{j=-n}^{0} frac{n!}{n^n sqrt{n}} frac{n^{n+j}}{(n+j)!} }{sum_{j=-n}^{infty} frac{n!}{n^n sqrt{n}}frac{n^{n+j}}{(n+j)!} }
approx frac{sum_{j=-n}^{0} e^{-(j/sqrt{n})^2/2} frac{1}{sqrt{n}} }{sum_{j=-n}^{infty} e^{-(j/sqrt{n})^2/2} frac{1}{sqrt{n}} }
approx frac{int_{-infty}^{0} e^{-x^2/2} , dx}{int_{-infty}^{infty} e^{-x^2/2} , dx}
= frac{1}{2}.
$$
Every solution that I know is more or less a rigorous realization of this kind of observation, and so, it is either involved or requiring extra knowledge.
Elementary proof. Define $A_n$, $B_n$ and $C_n$ by
$$ A_n := e^{-n} sum_{k=0}^{n} frac{n^k}{k!}, qquad B_n := e^{-n} sum_{k=n+1}^{infty} frac{n^k}{k!}, qquad C_n = frac{n^{n} e^{-n}}{n!}. $$
From the Taylor expansion of the exponential function, we know that $A_n + B_n = 1$. In order to show the desired convergence, it suffices to show that the following claim holds.
Claim. $A_n/B_n to 1$ as $ntoinfty$.
Indeed, once this is proved, then both $A_n$ and $B_n$ converge to $frac{1}{2}$ as $ntoinfty$.
Proof of Claim. Using the substitution $k = n-j$ followed by $p = j-1$, one may write
begin{align*}
frac{A_n}{C_n}
&= sum_{j=0}^{n} frac{n!}{(n-j)!n^j}
= 2 + sum_{p=1}^{n-1} prod_{l=1}^{p} left( 1 - frac{l}{n} right).
end{align*}
Similarly, applying the substitution $k = n+p$, one may write
begin{align*}
frac{B_n}{C_n}
&= sum_{p=1}^{infty} frac{n!n^p}{(n+p)!}
= sum_{p=1}^{infty} prod_{l=1}^{p} left( frac{1}{1 + frac{l}{n}} right).
end{align*}
1. Estimation of leading sums. Fix $alpha in left( 0, frac{1}{3} right)$ and set $N = N(alpha) = leftlceil n^{(1+alpha)/2} rightrceil$. Then using the asymptotic formula $1+x = e^{x+mathcal{O}(x^2)}$ as $x to 0$, for $1 leq p leq N$ we have
$$ prod_{l=1}^{p} left( 1 - frac{l}{n} right)
= expleft{ -frac{p^2}{2n} + mathcal{O}left( n^{-(1-3alpha)/2} right) right}
= prod_{l=1}^{p} left( frac{1}{1 + frac{l}{n}} right). $$
In particular, there exists a constant $C > 0$, depending only on $alpha$, such that
$$ maxBigg{ prod_{l=1}^{N} left( 1 - frac{l}{n} right), prod_{l=1}^{N} left( frac{1}{1 + frac{l}{n}} right) Bigg} leq C e^{-frac{1}{2}n^{alpha}}. $$
2. Estimation of tail sums. In this time, consider $p > N$. Then we have
$$ prod_{l=1}^{p} left( 1 - frac{l}{n} right)
leq C e^{-frac{1}{2}n^{alpha}} left( 1 - frac{N}{n} right)^{p-N}
quad text{and} quad
prod_{l=1}^{p} left( frac{1}{1 + frac{l}{n}} right)
leq C e^{-frac{1}{2}n^{alpha}} left( frac{1}{1 + frac{N}{n}} right)^{p-N}. $$
So the tail sum for $A_n/C_n$ can be bounded from above by
$$ sum_{p=N+1}^{n-1} prod_{l=1}^{p} left( 1 - frac{l}{n} right)
leq Ce^{-frac{1}{2}n^{alpha}} sum_{k = 0}^{infty} left( 1 - frac{N}{n} right)^k
leq frac{Cn}{N} e^{-frac{1}{2}n^{alpha}}
leq Cn^{(1-alpha)/2} e^{-frac{1}{2}n^{alpha}}, $$
and likewise,
$$ sum_{p=N+1}^{infty} prod_{l=1}^{p} left( frac{1}{1 + frac{l}{n}} right)
leq Ce^{-frac{1}{2}n^{alpha}} sum_{k = 0}^{infty} left( 1 - frac{N}{N+n} right)^k
leq frac{2Cn}{N} e^{-frac{1}{2}n^{alpha}}
leq 2Cn^{(1-alpha)/2} e^{-frac{1}{2}n^{alpha}}. $$
3. Conclusion. Combining altogether,
$$ frac{A_n}{B_n} = frac{left( 1 + o(1) right) sum_{p=1}^{N} e^{-frac{p^2}{2n}} + mathcal{O}(1)}{left( 1 + o(1) right) sum_{p=1}^{N} e^{-frac{p^2}{2n}} + o(1)}, $$
which can be easily shown to converge to $1$ as $ntoinfty$, since $sum_{p=1}^{N} e^{-frac{p^2}{2n}} geq sqrt{n} , e^{-1/2} to infty$ as $ntoinfty$. (In fact, this sum is $(1+o(1))sqrt{pi n/2}$ as $ntoinfty$.)
Heuristic argument. Although far from being rigorous, one can provide a heuristic computation which explains why we expect the answer to be $frac{1}{2}$. Notice that
$$ frac{n^{n+j}/(n+j)!}{n^n / n!} = begin{cases}
prod_{k=1}^{j} frac{n}{n+k}, & j geq 1 \
1, & j = 0, -1 \
prod_{k=1}^{-j-1} frac{n-k}{n}, & j leq -2
end{cases}
$$
In any of cases, taking logarithm and applying the approximation $log(1+x) approx x$ shows that the above quantity is approximately $e^{-j^2/2n}$. So
$$
e^{-n} sum_{k=0}^{n} frac{n^k}{k!}
= frac{sum_{j=-n}^{0} frac{n!}{n^n sqrt{n}} frac{n^{n+j}}{(n+j)!} }{sum_{j=-n}^{infty} frac{n!}{n^n sqrt{n}}frac{n^{n+j}}{(n+j)!} }
approx frac{sum_{j=-n}^{0} e^{-(j/sqrt{n})^2/2} frac{1}{sqrt{n}} }{sum_{j=-n}^{infty} e^{-(j/sqrt{n})^2/2} frac{1}{sqrt{n}} }
approx frac{int_{-infty}^{0} e^{-x^2/2} , dx}{int_{-infty}^{infty} e^{-x^2/2} , dx}
= frac{1}{2}.
$$
Every solution that I know is more or less a rigorous realization of this kind of observation, and so, it is either involved or requiring extra knowledge.
Elementary proof. Define $A_n$, $B_n$ and $C_n$ by
$$ A_n := e^{-n} sum_{k=0}^{n} frac{n^k}{k!}, qquad B_n := e^{-n} sum_{k=n+1}^{infty} frac{n^k}{k!}, qquad C_n = frac{n^{n} e^{-n}}{n!}. $$
From the Taylor expansion of the exponential function, we know that $A_n + B_n = 1$. In order to show the desired convergence, it suffices to show that the following claim holds.
Claim. $A_n/B_n to 1$ as $ntoinfty$.
Indeed, once this is proved, then both $A_n$ and $B_n$ converge to $frac{1}{2}$ as $ntoinfty$.
Proof of Claim. Using the substitution $k = n-j$ followed by $p = j-1$, one may write
begin{align*}
frac{A_n}{C_n}
&= sum_{j=0}^{n} frac{n!}{(n-j)!n^j}
= 2 + sum_{p=1}^{n-1} prod_{l=1}^{p} left( 1 - frac{l}{n} right).
end{align*}
Similarly, applying the substitution $k = n+p$, one may write
begin{align*}
frac{B_n}{C_n}
&= sum_{p=1}^{infty} frac{n!n^p}{(n+p)!}
= sum_{p=1}^{infty} prod_{l=1}^{p} left( frac{1}{1 + frac{l}{n}} right).
end{align*}
1. Estimation of leading sums. Fix $alpha in left( 0, frac{1}{3} right)$ and set $N = N(alpha) = leftlceil n^{(1+alpha)/2} rightrceil$. Then using the asymptotic formula $1+x = e^{x+mathcal{O}(x^2)}$ as $x to 0$, for $1 leq p leq N$ we have
$$ prod_{l=1}^{p} left( 1 - frac{l}{n} right)
= expleft{ -frac{p^2}{2n} + mathcal{O}left( n^{-(1-3alpha)/2} right) right}
= prod_{l=1}^{p} left( frac{1}{1 + frac{l}{n}} right). $$
In particular, there exists a constant $C > 0$, depending only on $alpha$, such that
$$ maxBigg{ prod_{l=1}^{N} left( 1 - frac{l}{n} right), prod_{l=1}^{N} left( frac{1}{1 + frac{l}{n}} right) Bigg} leq C e^{-frac{1}{2}n^{alpha}}. $$
2. Estimation of tail sums. In this time, consider $p > N$. Then we have
$$ prod_{l=1}^{p} left( 1 - frac{l}{n} right)
leq C e^{-frac{1}{2}n^{alpha}} left( 1 - frac{N}{n} right)^{p-N}
quad text{and} quad
prod_{l=1}^{p} left( frac{1}{1 + frac{l}{n}} right)
leq C e^{-frac{1}{2}n^{alpha}} left( frac{1}{1 + frac{N}{n}} right)^{p-N}. $$
So the tail sum for $A_n/C_n$ can be bounded from above by
$$ sum_{p=N+1}^{n-1} prod_{l=1}^{p} left( 1 - frac{l}{n} right)
leq Ce^{-frac{1}{2}n^{alpha}} sum_{k = 0}^{infty} left( 1 - frac{N}{n} right)^k
leq frac{Cn}{N} e^{-frac{1}{2}n^{alpha}}
leq Cn^{(1-alpha)/2} e^{-frac{1}{2}n^{alpha}}, $$
and likewise,
$$ sum_{p=N+1}^{infty} prod_{l=1}^{p} left( frac{1}{1 + frac{l}{n}} right)
leq Ce^{-frac{1}{2}n^{alpha}} sum_{k = 0}^{infty} left( 1 - frac{N}{N+n} right)^k
leq frac{2Cn}{N} e^{-frac{1}{2}n^{alpha}}
leq 2Cn^{(1-alpha)/2} e^{-frac{1}{2}n^{alpha}}. $$
3. Conclusion. Combining altogether,
$$ frac{A_n}{B_n} = frac{left( 1 + o(1) right) sum_{p=1}^{N} e^{-frac{p^2}{2n}} + mathcal{O}(1)}{left( 1 + o(1) right) sum_{p=1}^{N} e^{-frac{p^2}{2n}} + o(1)}, $$
which can be easily shown to converge to $1$ as $ntoinfty$, since $sum_{p=1}^{N} e^{-frac{p^2}{2n}} geq sqrt{n} , e^{-1/2} to infty$ as $ntoinfty$. (In fact, this sum is $(1+o(1))sqrt{pi n/2}$ as $ntoinfty$.)
edited 2 days ago
answered Nov 16 at 2:30
Sangchul Lee
89.7k12161262
89.7k12161262
Thank you for your answer! I've filled my question with more details to be more specific on the kind of solution I am looking form. Unfortunately, yours doesn't fall in this category, but for your efforts, I am giving you +1.
– user128409235
Nov 18 at 9:02
add a comment |
Thank you for your answer! I've filled my question with more details to be more specific on the kind of solution I am looking form. Unfortunately, yours doesn't fall in this category, but for your efforts, I am giving you +1.
– user128409235
Nov 18 at 9:02
Thank you for your answer! I've filled my question with more details to be more specific on the kind of solution I am looking form. Unfortunately, yours doesn't fall in this category, but for your efforts, I am giving you +1.
– user128409235
Nov 18 at 9:02
Thank you for your answer! I've filled my question with more details to be more specific on the kind of solution I am looking form. Unfortunately, yours doesn't fall in this category, but for your efforts, I am giving you +1.
– user128409235
Nov 18 at 9:02
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3000437%2flim-n-to-infty-e-n-sum-k-0n-fracnkk-frac12-basic-m%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Previous times this question has been asked: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2603315/…, math.stackexchange.com/questions/160248/… . I'm not flagging as duplicate because the question specifically asks for basic methods.
– Michael Lugo
Nov 15 at 23:42
Interestingly, the general term $n^k/k!$ is maximum when $k=n$. And by some magic, the sum "before" equals the sum "after" (asymptotically).
– Yves Daoust
Nov 18 at 13:12
Without an algebraic miracle, I do not think there is a simple and rigorous solution. My rationale is that any solution should demonstrate the understanding on the concentration behavior of the function $k mapsto frac{n^k}{k!}e^{-n}$ around $k = n$. Both the probabilistic solution (using Poisson distribution + CLT) and the solution using integral show this. My solution is also based on this kind of observation.
– Sangchul Lee
Nov 18 at 19:16