Prove function is identically 0 on an open set from it being 0 on a subset of the boundary
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
This is a homework question so please don't provide the full proof.
Hi everyone,
Let $f$ be holomorphic on the open square $U = {zin mathbb{C}: |Re ,z| <1, |Im ,z| < 1}$ and continuous on its closure $bar{U}$. Suppose $f=0$ on ${zin bar{U}: Re , z =1}$, prove $f = 0$ on $U$.
My attempt
Method 1: By Max Modulus Theorem, $max_{zin U} |f(z)| = max_{zin partial U} |f(z)|$, so it suffices to show that $f$ is identically $0$ on the four edges of the rectangle. To this end, I am trying to use the Identity Theorem, but I don't see how it can be applied.
Another method: Define $g(z) = f(iz + i)$, then by assumption, $g$ is identically $0$ on $(-1, 1)$, holomorphic on ${zin mathbb{C}: -1< Re ,z <1, -2<Im ,z < 0}$. Then I am trying to use the Schwarz reflection principle to extend this function to a holomorphic function on the entire plane and then apply the Identity Theorem. But since this function is only holomorphic on a subset of the lower half plane, I don't see how Schwarz reflection principle can be applied.
Some hints would be greatly appreciated. Thanks a lot.
complex-analysis
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
This is a homework question so please don't provide the full proof.
Hi everyone,
Let $f$ be holomorphic on the open square $U = {zin mathbb{C}: |Re ,z| <1, |Im ,z| < 1}$ and continuous on its closure $bar{U}$. Suppose $f=0$ on ${zin bar{U}: Re , z =1}$, prove $f = 0$ on $U$.
My attempt
Method 1: By Max Modulus Theorem, $max_{zin U} |f(z)| = max_{zin partial U} |f(z)|$, so it suffices to show that $f$ is identically $0$ on the four edges of the rectangle. To this end, I am trying to use the Identity Theorem, but I don't see how it can be applied.
Another method: Define $g(z) = f(iz + i)$, then by assumption, $g$ is identically $0$ on $(-1, 1)$, holomorphic on ${zin mathbb{C}: -1< Re ,z <1, -2<Im ,z < 0}$. Then I am trying to use the Schwarz reflection principle to extend this function to a holomorphic function on the entire plane and then apply the Identity Theorem. But since this function is only holomorphic on a subset of the lower half plane, I don't see how Schwarz reflection principle can be applied.
Some hints would be greatly appreciated. Thanks a lot.
complex-analysis
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
This is a homework question so please don't provide the full proof.
Hi everyone,
Let $f$ be holomorphic on the open square $U = {zin mathbb{C}: |Re ,z| <1, |Im ,z| < 1}$ and continuous on its closure $bar{U}$. Suppose $f=0$ on ${zin bar{U}: Re , z =1}$, prove $f = 0$ on $U$.
My attempt
Method 1: By Max Modulus Theorem, $max_{zin U} |f(z)| = max_{zin partial U} |f(z)|$, so it suffices to show that $f$ is identically $0$ on the four edges of the rectangle. To this end, I am trying to use the Identity Theorem, but I don't see how it can be applied.
Another method: Define $g(z) = f(iz + i)$, then by assumption, $g$ is identically $0$ on $(-1, 1)$, holomorphic on ${zin mathbb{C}: -1< Re ,z <1, -2<Im ,z < 0}$. Then I am trying to use the Schwarz reflection principle to extend this function to a holomorphic function on the entire plane and then apply the Identity Theorem. But since this function is only holomorphic on a subset of the lower half plane, I don't see how Schwarz reflection principle can be applied.
Some hints would be greatly appreciated. Thanks a lot.
complex-analysis
This is a homework question so please don't provide the full proof.
Hi everyone,
Let $f$ be holomorphic on the open square $U = {zin mathbb{C}: |Re ,z| <1, |Im ,z| < 1}$ and continuous on its closure $bar{U}$. Suppose $f=0$ on ${zin bar{U}: Re , z =1}$, prove $f = 0$ on $U$.
My attempt
Method 1: By Max Modulus Theorem, $max_{zin U} |f(z)| = max_{zin partial U} |f(z)|$, so it suffices to show that $f$ is identically $0$ on the four edges of the rectangle. To this end, I am trying to use the Identity Theorem, but I don't see how it can be applied.
Another method: Define $g(z) = f(iz + i)$, then by assumption, $g$ is identically $0$ on $(-1, 1)$, holomorphic on ${zin mathbb{C}: -1< Re ,z <1, -2<Im ,z < 0}$. Then I am trying to use the Schwarz reflection principle to extend this function to a holomorphic function on the entire plane and then apply the Identity Theorem. But since this function is only holomorphic on a subset of the lower half plane, I don't see how Schwarz reflection principle can be applied.
Some hints would be greatly appreciated. Thanks a lot.
complex-analysis
complex-analysis
asked Nov 15 at 23:34
mkmlp
151211
151211
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
Hint: consider $f(z)f(iz)$. Show that if a product of two analytic functions is $0$ then one of them must be $0$.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
This answer is based on Kavi Rama Murthy's hint (and also a hint from the instructor of my class, which is similar to Kavi's, actually). Many thanks to Kavi!
First , define $g_1(z) = f(iz)$. It is immediate that $g$ is holomorphic on $U$, continuous on $overline{U}$ and is $0$ for all ${zin overline{U} mid Im, z = -1}$.
Similarly, if we define $g_2(z) = f(-z), g_3(z) = f(-iz), g_4(z) = f(z)$, then $g = g_1g_2g_3g_4$ is holomorphic on $U$, continuous on $overline{U}$ and identically $0$ on $partial U$.
By Max Modulus Theorem,
begin{equation}
max_{zin U} |g(z)| = max_{zin partial U} |g(z)| = 0,
end{equation}
proving $g(z) = 0$ for all $zin overline{U}$, which implies that for any $z in overline{U}$, there exists $iin {1, 2, 3, 4}$ such that $g_i(z)=0$. And this is of course true for any $zin overline{B_{1/2}(0)}$ as well.
Since $overline{B_{1/2}(0)}$ is uncountable, one of the sets ${zin overline{B_{1/2}(0)} mid g_i(z)=0}$, $i = 1, 2, 3, 4$, must be uncountable and hence must have a limit point in $overline{B_{1/2}(0)} subseteq U$ by compactness of $overline{B_{1/2}(0)}$.
By Identity Theorem, for this particular $i$, $g_i$ is identically $0$ on $U$.
It is easy to see from the definitions of $g_1, g_2, g_3, g_4$ that this implies $f$ being identically $0$ on $U$ regardless of what $i$ is, proving the result.
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
Hint: consider $f(z)f(iz)$. Show that if a product of two analytic functions is $0$ then one of them must be $0$.
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
Hint: consider $f(z)f(iz)$. Show that if a product of two analytic functions is $0$ then one of them must be $0$.
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
Hint: consider $f(z)f(iz)$. Show that if a product of two analytic functions is $0$ then one of them must be $0$.
Hint: consider $f(z)f(iz)$. Show that if a product of two analytic functions is $0$ then one of them must be $0$.
answered Nov 15 at 23:53
Kavi Rama Murthy
40.7k31751
40.7k31751
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
This answer is based on Kavi Rama Murthy's hint (and also a hint from the instructor of my class, which is similar to Kavi's, actually). Many thanks to Kavi!
First , define $g_1(z) = f(iz)$. It is immediate that $g$ is holomorphic on $U$, continuous on $overline{U}$ and is $0$ for all ${zin overline{U} mid Im, z = -1}$.
Similarly, if we define $g_2(z) = f(-z), g_3(z) = f(-iz), g_4(z) = f(z)$, then $g = g_1g_2g_3g_4$ is holomorphic on $U$, continuous on $overline{U}$ and identically $0$ on $partial U$.
By Max Modulus Theorem,
begin{equation}
max_{zin U} |g(z)| = max_{zin partial U} |g(z)| = 0,
end{equation}
proving $g(z) = 0$ for all $zin overline{U}$, which implies that for any $z in overline{U}$, there exists $iin {1, 2, 3, 4}$ such that $g_i(z)=0$. And this is of course true for any $zin overline{B_{1/2}(0)}$ as well.
Since $overline{B_{1/2}(0)}$ is uncountable, one of the sets ${zin overline{B_{1/2}(0)} mid g_i(z)=0}$, $i = 1, 2, 3, 4$, must be uncountable and hence must have a limit point in $overline{B_{1/2}(0)} subseteq U$ by compactness of $overline{B_{1/2}(0)}$.
By Identity Theorem, for this particular $i$, $g_i$ is identically $0$ on $U$.
It is easy to see from the definitions of $g_1, g_2, g_3, g_4$ that this implies $f$ being identically $0$ on $U$ regardless of what $i$ is, proving the result.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
This answer is based on Kavi Rama Murthy's hint (and also a hint from the instructor of my class, which is similar to Kavi's, actually). Many thanks to Kavi!
First , define $g_1(z) = f(iz)$. It is immediate that $g$ is holomorphic on $U$, continuous on $overline{U}$ and is $0$ for all ${zin overline{U} mid Im, z = -1}$.
Similarly, if we define $g_2(z) = f(-z), g_3(z) = f(-iz), g_4(z) = f(z)$, then $g = g_1g_2g_3g_4$ is holomorphic on $U$, continuous on $overline{U}$ and identically $0$ on $partial U$.
By Max Modulus Theorem,
begin{equation}
max_{zin U} |g(z)| = max_{zin partial U} |g(z)| = 0,
end{equation}
proving $g(z) = 0$ for all $zin overline{U}$, which implies that for any $z in overline{U}$, there exists $iin {1, 2, 3, 4}$ such that $g_i(z)=0$. And this is of course true for any $zin overline{B_{1/2}(0)}$ as well.
Since $overline{B_{1/2}(0)}$ is uncountable, one of the sets ${zin overline{B_{1/2}(0)} mid g_i(z)=0}$, $i = 1, 2, 3, 4$, must be uncountable and hence must have a limit point in $overline{B_{1/2}(0)} subseteq U$ by compactness of $overline{B_{1/2}(0)}$.
By Identity Theorem, for this particular $i$, $g_i$ is identically $0$ on $U$.
It is easy to see from the definitions of $g_1, g_2, g_3, g_4$ that this implies $f$ being identically $0$ on $U$ regardless of what $i$ is, proving the result.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
This answer is based on Kavi Rama Murthy's hint (and also a hint from the instructor of my class, which is similar to Kavi's, actually). Many thanks to Kavi!
First , define $g_1(z) = f(iz)$. It is immediate that $g$ is holomorphic on $U$, continuous on $overline{U}$ and is $0$ for all ${zin overline{U} mid Im, z = -1}$.
Similarly, if we define $g_2(z) = f(-z), g_3(z) = f(-iz), g_4(z) = f(z)$, then $g = g_1g_2g_3g_4$ is holomorphic on $U$, continuous on $overline{U}$ and identically $0$ on $partial U$.
By Max Modulus Theorem,
begin{equation}
max_{zin U} |g(z)| = max_{zin partial U} |g(z)| = 0,
end{equation}
proving $g(z) = 0$ for all $zin overline{U}$, which implies that for any $z in overline{U}$, there exists $iin {1, 2, 3, 4}$ such that $g_i(z)=0$. And this is of course true for any $zin overline{B_{1/2}(0)}$ as well.
Since $overline{B_{1/2}(0)}$ is uncountable, one of the sets ${zin overline{B_{1/2}(0)} mid g_i(z)=0}$, $i = 1, 2, 3, 4$, must be uncountable and hence must have a limit point in $overline{B_{1/2}(0)} subseteq U$ by compactness of $overline{B_{1/2}(0)}$.
By Identity Theorem, for this particular $i$, $g_i$ is identically $0$ on $U$.
It is easy to see from the definitions of $g_1, g_2, g_3, g_4$ that this implies $f$ being identically $0$ on $U$ regardless of what $i$ is, proving the result.
This answer is based on Kavi Rama Murthy's hint (and also a hint from the instructor of my class, which is similar to Kavi's, actually). Many thanks to Kavi!
First , define $g_1(z) = f(iz)$. It is immediate that $g$ is holomorphic on $U$, continuous on $overline{U}$ and is $0$ for all ${zin overline{U} mid Im, z = -1}$.
Similarly, if we define $g_2(z) = f(-z), g_3(z) = f(-iz), g_4(z) = f(z)$, then $g = g_1g_2g_3g_4$ is holomorphic on $U$, continuous on $overline{U}$ and identically $0$ on $partial U$.
By Max Modulus Theorem,
begin{equation}
max_{zin U} |g(z)| = max_{zin partial U} |g(z)| = 0,
end{equation}
proving $g(z) = 0$ for all $zin overline{U}$, which implies that for any $z in overline{U}$, there exists $iin {1, 2, 3, 4}$ such that $g_i(z)=0$. And this is of course true for any $zin overline{B_{1/2}(0)}$ as well.
Since $overline{B_{1/2}(0)}$ is uncountable, one of the sets ${zin overline{B_{1/2}(0)} mid g_i(z)=0}$, $i = 1, 2, 3, 4$, must be uncountable and hence must have a limit point in $overline{B_{1/2}(0)} subseteq U$ by compactness of $overline{B_{1/2}(0)}$.
By Identity Theorem, for this particular $i$, $g_i$ is identically $0$ on $U$.
It is easy to see from the definitions of $g_1, g_2, g_3, g_4$ that this implies $f$ being identically $0$ on $U$ regardless of what $i$ is, proving the result.
answered Nov 16 at 1:38
mkmlp
151211
151211
add a comment |
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3000492%2fprove-function-is-identically-0-on-an-open-set-from-it-being-0-on-a-subset-of-th%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown