Prove that the limit of the sequence $a_n:=frac{6n+1}{2n+5}$ is 3, using the Epsilon definition.
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
I want to show that for sequence $(a_n)$, defined as $a_n=frac{6n+5}{2n+5}$, the following statement is true:
$$lim_{n rightarrow infty} {frac{6n+1}{2n+5}}=3$$
I started with stating that there exists an arbritary but fixed $ε>0$ and assumed that for an $n$ and $N_ε$, $n > N_ε$. I then used the Epsilon definition to prove that the limit is 3.
$$|a_n-3|<ε=|frac{6n+1}{2n+5}-3|<ε iff (frac{6n+1}{2n+5}-3)=frac{-7}{n}<ε iff frac{-7}{ε}=n$$
Here I set $frac{-7}{ε}=:N_ε$ and since we know that $n>N_ε$ that means that $$frac{1}{n}<frac{1}{ε}=frac{1}{frac{-7}{ε}}=frac{ε}{-7} ≠ ε$$
I don't understand where I went wrong in this proof, I've tried the same thing with other examples and get stuck in the same place.
real-analysis sequences-and-series limits proof-writing epsilon-delta
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
I want to show that for sequence $(a_n)$, defined as $a_n=frac{6n+5}{2n+5}$, the following statement is true:
$$lim_{n rightarrow infty} {frac{6n+1}{2n+5}}=3$$
I started with stating that there exists an arbritary but fixed $ε>0$ and assumed that for an $n$ and $N_ε$, $n > N_ε$. I then used the Epsilon definition to prove that the limit is 3.
$$|a_n-3|<ε=|frac{6n+1}{2n+5}-3|<ε iff (frac{6n+1}{2n+5}-3)=frac{-7}{n}<ε iff frac{-7}{ε}=n$$
Here I set $frac{-7}{ε}=:N_ε$ and since we know that $n>N_ε$ that means that $$frac{1}{n}<frac{1}{ε}=frac{1}{frac{-7}{ε}}=frac{ε}{-7} ≠ ε$$
I don't understand where I went wrong in this proof, I've tried the same thing with other examples and get stuck in the same place.
real-analysis sequences-and-series limits proof-writing epsilon-delta
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
I want to show that for sequence $(a_n)$, defined as $a_n=frac{6n+5}{2n+5}$, the following statement is true:
$$lim_{n rightarrow infty} {frac{6n+1}{2n+5}}=3$$
I started with stating that there exists an arbritary but fixed $ε>0$ and assumed that for an $n$ and $N_ε$, $n > N_ε$. I then used the Epsilon definition to prove that the limit is 3.
$$|a_n-3|<ε=|frac{6n+1}{2n+5}-3|<ε iff (frac{6n+1}{2n+5}-3)=frac{-7}{n}<ε iff frac{-7}{ε}=n$$
Here I set $frac{-7}{ε}=:N_ε$ and since we know that $n>N_ε$ that means that $$frac{1}{n}<frac{1}{ε}=frac{1}{frac{-7}{ε}}=frac{ε}{-7} ≠ ε$$
I don't understand where I went wrong in this proof, I've tried the same thing with other examples and get stuck in the same place.
real-analysis sequences-and-series limits proof-writing epsilon-delta
I want to show that for sequence $(a_n)$, defined as $a_n=frac{6n+5}{2n+5}$, the following statement is true:
$$lim_{n rightarrow infty} {frac{6n+1}{2n+5}}=3$$
I started with stating that there exists an arbritary but fixed $ε>0$ and assumed that for an $n$ and $N_ε$, $n > N_ε$. I then used the Epsilon definition to prove that the limit is 3.
$$|a_n-3|<ε=|frac{6n+1}{2n+5}-3|<ε iff (frac{6n+1}{2n+5}-3)=frac{-7}{n}<ε iff frac{-7}{ε}=n$$
Here I set $frac{-7}{ε}=:N_ε$ and since we know that $n>N_ε$ that means that $$frac{1}{n}<frac{1}{ε}=frac{1}{frac{-7}{ε}}=frac{ε}{-7} ≠ ε$$
I don't understand where I went wrong in this proof, I've tried the same thing with other examples and get stuck in the same place.
real-analysis sequences-and-series limits proof-writing epsilon-delta
real-analysis sequences-and-series limits proof-writing epsilon-delta
edited Nov 22 at 13:07
José Carlos Santos
146k22117217
146k22117217
asked Nov 22 at 12:28
xxxtentacion
369112
369112
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
You made one algebra error, and a number of other errors in the way your proof is organized and presented.
The algebra error, as José Carlos Santos notes, is that ${6n+1over2n+5}-3={-14over2n+5}$, not $-7over n$. So that of course affects what comes after. However, let's suppose $a_n-3={-7over n}$ is correct, and go from there.
The first, minor, problem is either a typo or a misuse of the equal sign: where you write
$$|a_n-3|ltepsilon=|{6n+1over2n+5}-3|ltepsilon$$
you really mean is $iff$ instead of $=$, i.e.,
$$|a_n-3|ltepsiloniff|{6n+1over2n+5}-3|ltepsilon$$
Also, at the other end of the display, where you write ${-7overepsilon}=n$, it should be ${-7overepsilon}lt n$.
The second, more serious, problem is that $|a_n-3|ltepsilon$ is not equivalent to $(a_n-3)ltepsilon$; the absolute value sign is important. So the first set of displayed expressions should end in
$$|a_n-3|=left|-7over nright|ltepsiloniff {7overepsilon}lt n$$
and thus we should set $N_epsilon={7overepsilon}$.
The next problem is merely, I think, a typo: where you say that $ngt N_epsilon$ means that ${1over n}lt{1overepsilon}$, you pretty clearly meant to write ${1over n}lt{1over N_epsilon}$, since you go on to substitute the expression you derived for $N_epsilon$ in the continuation.
The final, most significant, problem is one of logical relevance. You note, correctly, that $epsilonover-7$ (which, as noted above, shouldn't have the minus sign) is not equal to $epsilon$. But that doesn't matter. What you really need here is a set of implications along the lines of
$$ngt N_epsilonimplies{1over n}lt{1over N_epsilon}={epsilonover7}implies|a_n-3|={7over n}lt7cdot{epsilonover7}=epsilon$$
Of these, I'd say, the final problem is the most important: It looks like you were trying to derive the inequality ${1over n}ltepsilon$ instead of $|a_n-3|ltepsilon$. In other words, it looks like you lost track of what it is you are supposed to prove. It might help, for future proofs of this type, to keep in mind that, come hell or high water, you need to wrap things up with a logical sentence of the form $ngt N_epsilonimplies|a_n-L|ltepsilon$.
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
For some reason, your absolute value vanished. It turns ou that$$leftlvertfrac{6n+1}{2n+5}-3rightrvert=frac{14}{5+2n}.$$And$$frac{14}{5+2n}<varepsiloniff n>frac{14-5varepsilon}varepsilon.$$
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
Be careful:
When we're given an arbitrary $varepsilon>0$ we have to find $N_varepsilon$ such that, for $n>N_varepsilon$,
$$
left|frac{6n+1}{2n+5}-3right|<varepsilon
$$
We don't need to do “$iff$” as you seem to want. Now consider that
$$
left|frac{6n+1}{2n+5}-3right|=
left|frac{6n+1-3(2n+5)}{2n+5}right|=
left|frac{-14}{2n+5}right|=
frac{14}{2n+5}<frac{14}{2n}=frac{7}{n}
$$
We know have $7/n<varepsilon$ provided $n>7/varepsilon$, so we can take $N_varepsilon$ the largest integer less than or equal to $7/varepsilon$. For $n>N_varepsilon$ we thus have
$$
varepsilon>frac{7}{n}geleft|frac{6n+1}{2n+5}-3right|
$$
which ends our proof.
Be careful when you remove the absolute value sign and also how you look for upper bounds.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3009069%2fprove-that-the-limit-of-the-sequence-a-n-frac6n12n5-is-3-using-the-ep%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
You made one algebra error, and a number of other errors in the way your proof is organized and presented.
The algebra error, as José Carlos Santos notes, is that ${6n+1over2n+5}-3={-14over2n+5}$, not $-7over n$. So that of course affects what comes after. However, let's suppose $a_n-3={-7over n}$ is correct, and go from there.
The first, minor, problem is either a typo or a misuse of the equal sign: where you write
$$|a_n-3|ltepsilon=|{6n+1over2n+5}-3|ltepsilon$$
you really mean is $iff$ instead of $=$, i.e.,
$$|a_n-3|ltepsiloniff|{6n+1over2n+5}-3|ltepsilon$$
Also, at the other end of the display, where you write ${-7overepsilon}=n$, it should be ${-7overepsilon}lt n$.
The second, more serious, problem is that $|a_n-3|ltepsilon$ is not equivalent to $(a_n-3)ltepsilon$; the absolute value sign is important. So the first set of displayed expressions should end in
$$|a_n-3|=left|-7over nright|ltepsiloniff {7overepsilon}lt n$$
and thus we should set $N_epsilon={7overepsilon}$.
The next problem is merely, I think, a typo: where you say that $ngt N_epsilon$ means that ${1over n}lt{1overepsilon}$, you pretty clearly meant to write ${1over n}lt{1over N_epsilon}$, since you go on to substitute the expression you derived for $N_epsilon$ in the continuation.
The final, most significant, problem is one of logical relevance. You note, correctly, that $epsilonover-7$ (which, as noted above, shouldn't have the minus sign) is not equal to $epsilon$. But that doesn't matter. What you really need here is a set of implications along the lines of
$$ngt N_epsilonimplies{1over n}lt{1over N_epsilon}={epsilonover7}implies|a_n-3|={7over n}lt7cdot{epsilonover7}=epsilon$$
Of these, I'd say, the final problem is the most important: It looks like you were trying to derive the inequality ${1over n}ltepsilon$ instead of $|a_n-3|ltepsilon$. In other words, it looks like you lost track of what it is you are supposed to prove. It might help, for future proofs of this type, to keep in mind that, come hell or high water, you need to wrap things up with a logical sentence of the form $ngt N_epsilonimplies|a_n-L|ltepsilon$.
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
You made one algebra error, and a number of other errors in the way your proof is organized and presented.
The algebra error, as José Carlos Santos notes, is that ${6n+1over2n+5}-3={-14over2n+5}$, not $-7over n$. So that of course affects what comes after. However, let's suppose $a_n-3={-7over n}$ is correct, and go from there.
The first, minor, problem is either a typo or a misuse of the equal sign: where you write
$$|a_n-3|ltepsilon=|{6n+1over2n+5}-3|ltepsilon$$
you really mean is $iff$ instead of $=$, i.e.,
$$|a_n-3|ltepsiloniff|{6n+1over2n+5}-3|ltepsilon$$
Also, at the other end of the display, where you write ${-7overepsilon}=n$, it should be ${-7overepsilon}lt n$.
The second, more serious, problem is that $|a_n-3|ltepsilon$ is not equivalent to $(a_n-3)ltepsilon$; the absolute value sign is important. So the first set of displayed expressions should end in
$$|a_n-3|=left|-7over nright|ltepsiloniff {7overepsilon}lt n$$
and thus we should set $N_epsilon={7overepsilon}$.
The next problem is merely, I think, a typo: where you say that $ngt N_epsilon$ means that ${1over n}lt{1overepsilon}$, you pretty clearly meant to write ${1over n}lt{1over N_epsilon}$, since you go on to substitute the expression you derived for $N_epsilon$ in the continuation.
The final, most significant, problem is one of logical relevance. You note, correctly, that $epsilonover-7$ (which, as noted above, shouldn't have the minus sign) is not equal to $epsilon$. But that doesn't matter. What you really need here is a set of implications along the lines of
$$ngt N_epsilonimplies{1over n}lt{1over N_epsilon}={epsilonover7}implies|a_n-3|={7over n}lt7cdot{epsilonover7}=epsilon$$
Of these, I'd say, the final problem is the most important: It looks like you were trying to derive the inequality ${1over n}ltepsilon$ instead of $|a_n-3|ltepsilon$. In other words, it looks like you lost track of what it is you are supposed to prove. It might help, for future proofs of this type, to keep in mind that, come hell or high water, you need to wrap things up with a logical sentence of the form $ngt N_epsilonimplies|a_n-L|ltepsilon$.
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
You made one algebra error, and a number of other errors in the way your proof is organized and presented.
The algebra error, as José Carlos Santos notes, is that ${6n+1over2n+5}-3={-14over2n+5}$, not $-7over n$. So that of course affects what comes after. However, let's suppose $a_n-3={-7over n}$ is correct, and go from there.
The first, minor, problem is either a typo or a misuse of the equal sign: where you write
$$|a_n-3|ltepsilon=|{6n+1over2n+5}-3|ltepsilon$$
you really mean is $iff$ instead of $=$, i.e.,
$$|a_n-3|ltepsiloniff|{6n+1over2n+5}-3|ltepsilon$$
Also, at the other end of the display, where you write ${-7overepsilon}=n$, it should be ${-7overepsilon}lt n$.
The second, more serious, problem is that $|a_n-3|ltepsilon$ is not equivalent to $(a_n-3)ltepsilon$; the absolute value sign is important. So the first set of displayed expressions should end in
$$|a_n-3|=left|-7over nright|ltepsiloniff {7overepsilon}lt n$$
and thus we should set $N_epsilon={7overepsilon}$.
The next problem is merely, I think, a typo: where you say that $ngt N_epsilon$ means that ${1over n}lt{1overepsilon}$, you pretty clearly meant to write ${1over n}lt{1over N_epsilon}$, since you go on to substitute the expression you derived for $N_epsilon$ in the continuation.
The final, most significant, problem is one of logical relevance. You note, correctly, that $epsilonover-7$ (which, as noted above, shouldn't have the minus sign) is not equal to $epsilon$. But that doesn't matter. What you really need here is a set of implications along the lines of
$$ngt N_epsilonimplies{1over n}lt{1over N_epsilon}={epsilonover7}implies|a_n-3|={7over n}lt7cdot{epsilonover7}=epsilon$$
Of these, I'd say, the final problem is the most important: It looks like you were trying to derive the inequality ${1over n}ltepsilon$ instead of $|a_n-3|ltepsilon$. In other words, it looks like you lost track of what it is you are supposed to prove. It might help, for future proofs of this type, to keep in mind that, come hell or high water, you need to wrap things up with a logical sentence of the form $ngt N_epsilonimplies|a_n-L|ltepsilon$.
You made one algebra error, and a number of other errors in the way your proof is organized and presented.
The algebra error, as José Carlos Santos notes, is that ${6n+1over2n+5}-3={-14over2n+5}$, not $-7over n$. So that of course affects what comes after. However, let's suppose $a_n-3={-7over n}$ is correct, and go from there.
The first, minor, problem is either a typo or a misuse of the equal sign: where you write
$$|a_n-3|ltepsilon=|{6n+1over2n+5}-3|ltepsilon$$
you really mean is $iff$ instead of $=$, i.e.,
$$|a_n-3|ltepsiloniff|{6n+1over2n+5}-3|ltepsilon$$
Also, at the other end of the display, where you write ${-7overepsilon}=n$, it should be ${-7overepsilon}lt n$.
The second, more serious, problem is that $|a_n-3|ltepsilon$ is not equivalent to $(a_n-3)ltepsilon$; the absolute value sign is important. So the first set of displayed expressions should end in
$$|a_n-3|=left|-7over nright|ltepsiloniff {7overepsilon}lt n$$
and thus we should set $N_epsilon={7overepsilon}$.
The next problem is merely, I think, a typo: where you say that $ngt N_epsilon$ means that ${1over n}lt{1overepsilon}$, you pretty clearly meant to write ${1over n}lt{1over N_epsilon}$, since you go on to substitute the expression you derived for $N_epsilon$ in the continuation.
The final, most significant, problem is one of logical relevance. You note, correctly, that $epsilonover-7$ (which, as noted above, shouldn't have the minus sign) is not equal to $epsilon$. But that doesn't matter. What you really need here is a set of implications along the lines of
$$ngt N_epsilonimplies{1over n}lt{1over N_epsilon}={epsilonover7}implies|a_n-3|={7over n}lt7cdot{epsilonover7}=epsilon$$
Of these, I'd say, the final problem is the most important: It looks like you were trying to derive the inequality ${1over n}ltepsilon$ instead of $|a_n-3|ltepsilon$. In other words, it looks like you lost track of what it is you are supposed to prove. It might help, for future proofs of this type, to keep in mind that, come hell or high water, you need to wrap things up with a logical sentence of the form $ngt N_epsilonimplies|a_n-L|ltepsilon$.
edited Nov 22 at 15:30
answered Nov 22 at 13:46
Barry Cipra
58.7k653122
58.7k653122
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
For some reason, your absolute value vanished. It turns ou that$$leftlvertfrac{6n+1}{2n+5}-3rightrvert=frac{14}{5+2n}.$$And$$frac{14}{5+2n}<varepsiloniff n>frac{14-5varepsilon}varepsilon.$$
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
For some reason, your absolute value vanished. It turns ou that$$leftlvertfrac{6n+1}{2n+5}-3rightrvert=frac{14}{5+2n}.$$And$$frac{14}{5+2n}<varepsiloniff n>frac{14-5varepsilon}varepsilon.$$
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
For some reason, your absolute value vanished. It turns ou that$$leftlvertfrac{6n+1}{2n+5}-3rightrvert=frac{14}{5+2n}.$$And$$frac{14}{5+2n}<varepsiloniff n>frac{14-5varepsilon}varepsilon.$$
For some reason, your absolute value vanished. It turns ou that$$leftlvertfrac{6n+1}{2n+5}-3rightrvert=frac{14}{5+2n}.$$And$$frac{14}{5+2n}<varepsiloniff n>frac{14-5varepsilon}varepsilon.$$
answered Nov 22 at 12:35
José Carlos Santos
146k22117217
146k22117217
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
Be careful:
When we're given an arbitrary $varepsilon>0$ we have to find $N_varepsilon$ such that, for $n>N_varepsilon$,
$$
left|frac{6n+1}{2n+5}-3right|<varepsilon
$$
We don't need to do “$iff$” as you seem to want. Now consider that
$$
left|frac{6n+1}{2n+5}-3right|=
left|frac{6n+1-3(2n+5)}{2n+5}right|=
left|frac{-14}{2n+5}right|=
frac{14}{2n+5}<frac{14}{2n}=frac{7}{n}
$$
We know have $7/n<varepsilon$ provided $n>7/varepsilon$, so we can take $N_varepsilon$ the largest integer less than or equal to $7/varepsilon$. For $n>N_varepsilon$ we thus have
$$
varepsilon>frac{7}{n}geleft|frac{6n+1}{2n+5}-3right|
$$
which ends our proof.
Be careful when you remove the absolute value sign and also how you look for upper bounds.
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
Be careful:
When we're given an arbitrary $varepsilon>0$ we have to find $N_varepsilon$ such that, for $n>N_varepsilon$,
$$
left|frac{6n+1}{2n+5}-3right|<varepsilon
$$
We don't need to do “$iff$” as you seem to want. Now consider that
$$
left|frac{6n+1}{2n+5}-3right|=
left|frac{6n+1-3(2n+5)}{2n+5}right|=
left|frac{-14}{2n+5}right|=
frac{14}{2n+5}<frac{14}{2n}=frac{7}{n}
$$
We know have $7/n<varepsilon$ provided $n>7/varepsilon$, so we can take $N_varepsilon$ the largest integer less than or equal to $7/varepsilon$. For $n>N_varepsilon$ we thus have
$$
varepsilon>frac{7}{n}geleft|frac{6n+1}{2n+5}-3right|
$$
which ends our proof.
Be careful when you remove the absolute value sign and also how you look for upper bounds.
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
Be careful:
When we're given an arbitrary $varepsilon>0$ we have to find $N_varepsilon$ such that, for $n>N_varepsilon$,
$$
left|frac{6n+1}{2n+5}-3right|<varepsilon
$$
We don't need to do “$iff$” as you seem to want. Now consider that
$$
left|frac{6n+1}{2n+5}-3right|=
left|frac{6n+1-3(2n+5)}{2n+5}right|=
left|frac{-14}{2n+5}right|=
frac{14}{2n+5}<frac{14}{2n}=frac{7}{n}
$$
We know have $7/n<varepsilon$ provided $n>7/varepsilon$, so we can take $N_varepsilon$ the largest integer less than or equal to $7/varepsilon$. For $n>N_varepsilon$ we thus have
$$
varepsilon>frac{7}{n}geleft|frac{6n+1}{2n+5}-3right|
$$
which ends our proof.
Be careful when you remove the absolute value sign and also how you look for upper bounds.
Be careful:
When we're given an arbitrary $varepsilon>0$ we have to find $N_varepsilon$ such that, for $n>N_varepsilon$,
$$
left|frac{6n+1}{2n+5}-3right|<varepsilon
$$
We don't need to do “$iff$” as you seem to want. Now consider that
$$
left|frac{6n+1}{2n+5}-3right|=
left|frac{6n+1-3(2n+5)}{2n+5}right|=
left|frac{-14}{2n+5}right|=
frac{14}{2n+5}<frac{14}{2n}=frac{7}{n}
$$
We know have $7/n<varepsilon$ provided $n>7/varepsilon$, so we can take $N_varepsilon$ the largest integer less than or equal to $7/varepsilon$. For $n>N_varepsilon$ we thus have
$$
varepsilon>frac{7}{n}geleft|frac{6n+1}{2n+5}-3right|
$$
which ends our proof.
Be careful when you remove the absolute value sign and also how you look for upper bounds.
answered Nov 22 at 14:43
egreg
176k1384198
176k1384198
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3009069%2fprove-that-the-limit-of-the-sequence-a-n-frac6n12n5-is-3-using-the-ep%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown