Show that $P(x,y)=0$ is a parabola if $b^2-4ac=0$.











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I tried the following:



I write the polynomial $P(x, y) = ax^2+bxy+cy^2+dx+ey+h$ in the form $P(x, y) = Ax2 + Bx + C$ where $A$, $B$, and $C$ are polynomial functions of $y$. This $P(x, y) = Q(x)$ has the discriminant $Delta_x(y) = (b^2 − 4ac)y^2 + (2bd − 4ae)y + (d^2 − 4ah)$. Letting $b^2-4ac=0$ makes $Delta_x(y)$ a linear function of $y$ and if $y ge frac{4ah -d^2}{2bd − 4ae}$ then for any of those $y$'s there is only one corresponding $x$. So IF for the $P(x, y)$ there are only four possible shapes: circle, ellipse, parabola and hyperbola then the only choice is parabola.



But the proof is not only complete but also doesn't look so rigorous. Are there any better proofs?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Strictly speaking, $P(x,y)=0$ is not necessarily a parabola when $b^2-4ac=0$. Take $a=b=c=d=0,e=h=1$. But as I've written in the answer to your another question, we can say that by a suitable rotation, $P(x,y)=0$ becomes an equation of the from $AX^2+CY^2+DX+EY+F=0$ with $AC=0$.
    – mathlove
    Nov 27 at 5:26












  • @mathlove, evaluation of P(x,y)=0 by rotation method is much easier, but the book didn't introduced it (yet?). But after learning about it in your answer I could evaluated different cases too.
    – 72D
    Nov 27 at 5:50















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I tried the following:



I write the polynomial $P(x, y) = ax^2+bxy+cy^2+dx+ey+h$ in the form $P(x, y) = Ax2 + Bx + C$ where $A$, $B$, and $C$ are polynomial functions of $y$. This $P(x, y) = Q(x)$ has the discriminant $Delta_x(y) = (b^2 − 4ac)y^2 + (2bd − 4ae)y + (d^2 − 4ah)$. Letting $b^2-4ac=0$ makes $Delta_x(y)$ a linear function of $y$ and if $y ge frac{4ah -d^2}{2bd − 4ae}$ then for any of those $y$'s there is only one corresponding $x$. So IF for the $P(x, y)$ there are only four possible shapes: circle, ellipse, parabola and hyperbola then the only choice is parabola.



But the proof is not only complete but also doesn't look so rigorous. Are there any better proofs?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Strictly speaking, $P(x,y)=0$ is not necessarily a parabola when $b^2-4ac=0$. Take $a=b=c=d=0,e=h=1$. But as I've written in the answer to your another question, we can say that by a suitable rotation, $P(x,y)=0$ becomes an equation of the from $AX^2+CY^2+DX+EY+F=0$ with $AC=0$.
    – mathlove
    Nov 27 at 5:26












  • @mathlove, evaluation of P(x,y)=0 by rotation method is much easier, but the book didn't introduced it (yet?). But after learning about it in your answer I could evaluated different cases too.
    – 72D
    Nov 27 at 5:50













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











I tried the following:



I write the polynomial $P(x, y) = ax^2+bxy+cy^2+dx+ey+h$ in the form $P(x, y) = Ax2 + Bx + C$ where $A$, $B$, and $C$ are polynomial functions of $y$. This $P(x, y) = Q(x)$ has the discriminant $Delta_x(y) = (b^2 − 4ac)y^2 + (2bd − 4ae)y + (d^2 − 4ah)$. Letting $b^2-4ac=0$ makes $Delta_x(y)$ a linear function of $y$ and if $y ge frac{4ah -d^2}{2bd − 4ae}$ then for any of those $y$'s there is only one corresponding $x$. So IF for the $P(x, y)$ there are only four possible shapes: circle, ellipse, parabola and hyperbola then the only choice is parabola.



But the proof is not only complete but also doesn't look so rigorous. Are there any better proofs?










share|cite|improve this question















I tried the following:



I write the polynomial $P(x, y) = ax^2+bxy+cy^2+dx+ey+h$ in the form $P(x, y) = Ax2 + Bx + C$ where $A$, $B$, and $C$ are polynomial functions of $y$. This $P(x, y) = Q(x)$ has the discriminant $Delta_x(y) = (b^2 − 4ac)y^2 + (2bd − 4ae)y + (d^2 − 4ah)$. Letting $b^2-4ac=0$ makes $Delta_x(y)$ a linear function of $y$ and if $y ge frac{4ah -d^2}{2bd − 4ae}$ then for any of those $y$'s there is only one corresponding $x$. So IF for the $P(x, y)$ there are only four possible shapes: circle, ellipse, parabola and hyperbola then the only choice is parabola.



But the proof is not only complete but also doesn't look so rigorous. Are there any better proofs?







proof-verification algebraic-geometry conic-sections plane-curves






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 22 at 13:38

























asked Nov 22 at 12:26









72D

536116




536116












  • Strictly speaking, $P(x,y)=0$ is not necessarily a parabola when $b^2-4ac=0$. Take $a=b=c=d=0,e=h=1$. But as I've written in the answer to your another question, we can say that by a suitable rotation, $P(x,y)=0$ becomes an equation of the from $AX^2+CY^2+DX+EY+F=0$ with $AC=0$.
    – mathlove
    Nov 27 at 5:26












  • @mathlove, evaluation of P(x,y)=0 by rotation method is much easier, but the book didn't introduced it (yet?). But after learning about it in your answer I could evaluated different cases too.
    – 72D
    Nov 27 at 5:50


















  • Strictly speaking, $P(x,y)=0$ is not necessarily a parabola when $b^2-4ac=0$. Take $a=b=c=d=0,e=h=1$. But as I've written in the answer to your another question, we can say that by a suitable rotation, $P(x,y)=0$ becomes an equation of the from $AX^2+CY^2+DX+EY+F=0$ with $AC=0$.
    – mathlove
    Nov 27 at 5:26












  • @mathlove, evaluation of P(x,y)=0 by rotation method is much easier, but the book didn't introduced it (yet?). But after learning about it in your answer I could evaluated different cases too.
    – 72D
    Nov 27 at 5:50
















Strictly speaking, $P(x,y)=0$ is not necessarily a parabola when $b^2-4ac=0$. Take $a=b=c=d=0,e=h=1$. But as I've written in the answer to your another question, we can say that by a suitable rotation, $P(x,y)=0$ becomes an equation of the from $AX^2+CY^2+DX+EY+F=0$ with $AC=0$.
– mathlove
Nov 27 at 5:26






Strictly speaking, $P(x,y)=0$ is not necessarily a parabola when $b^2-4ac=0$. Take $a=b=c=d=0,e=h=1$. But as I've written in the answer to your another question, we can say that by a suitable rotation, $P(x,y)=0$ becomes an equation of the from $AX^2+CY^2+DX+EY+F=0$ with $AC=0$.
– mathlove
Nov 27 at 5:26














@mathlove, evaluation of P(x,y)=0 by rotation method is much easier, but the book didn't introduced it (yet?). But after learning about it in your answer I could evaluated different cases too.
– 72D
Nov 27 at 5:50




@mathlove, evaluation of P(x,y)=0 by rotation method is much easier, but the book didn't introduced it (yet?). But after learning about it in your answer I could evaluated different cases too.
– 72D
Nov 27 at 5:50















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3009068%2fshow-that-px-y-0-is-a-parabola-if-b2-4ac-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown






























active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3009068%2fshow-that-px-y-0-is-a-parabola-if-b2-4ac-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Quarter-circle Tiles

build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

Mont Emei