Add a bracket in mathematical equation











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












    documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{report}
usepackage{amssymb,amsmath,amsthm,latexsym,mathrsfs,amsfonts,dsfont}
usepackage{mathtools, nccmath}

begin{document}
Let $sigma_H(mathbf{T})$ denote the Harte spectrum of $mathbf{T}$
i.e.
$$lambda=(lambda_1,cdots,lambda_d)notin sigma_H(mathbf{T})$$
$$ Updownarrow $$
$$ exists (U_1,cdots,U_d)in mathcal{B}(mathcal{H})^d;text{and};
(V_1,cdots,V_d)in mathcal{B}(mathcal{H})^d ;text{such that};$$
$$sum_{j=1}^dU_j(T_j-lambda_jI)=I;text{and};sum_{j=1}^d(T_j-
lambda_jI)V_j=I.$$

end{document}


I get



enter image description here



I want to get



enter image description here










share|improve this question






















  • Your usage of double dollar signs is odd. You should use the LaTeX equivalents, or better something like gather.
    – Johannes_B
    2 hours ago










  • Why not use a bmatrix env, one column
    – daleif
    1 hour ago










  • @daleif Unfortunalety I don't know how to use it. I hope that you provide me an answer.
    – Schüler
    1 hour ago










  • It is the same thing as geza and joule is doing just simpler, the various matrix envs should be covered in any decent latex introduction. But come to thing of it, the bedt solution is gezas, as it is better semantically
    – daleif
    1 hour ago















up vote
1
down vote

favorite












    documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{report}
usepackage{amssymb,amsmath,amsthm,latexsym,mathrsfs,amsfonts,dsfont}
usepackage{mathtools, nccmath}

begin{document}
Let $sigma_H(mathbf{T})$ denote the Harte spectrum of $mathbf{T}$
i.e.
$$lambda=(lambda_1,cdots,lambda_d)notin sigma_H(mathbf{T})$$
$$ Updownarrow $$
$$ exists (U_1,cdots,U_d)in mathcal{B}(mathcal{H})^d;text{and};
(V_1,cdots,V_d)in mathcal{B}(mathcal{H})^d ;text{such that};$$
$$sum_{j=1}^dU_j(T_j-lambda_jI)=I;text{and};sum_{j=1}^d(T_j-
lambda_jI)V_j=I.$$

end{document}


I get



enter image description here



I want to get



enter image description here










share|improve this question






















  • Your usage of double dollar signs is odd. You should use the LaTeX equivalents, or better something like gather.
    – Johannes_B
    2 hours ago










  • Why not use a bmatrix env, one column
    – daleif
    1 hour ago










  • @daleif Unfortunalety I don't know how to use it. I hope that you provide me an answer.
    – Schüler
    1 hour ago










  • It is the same thing as geza and joule is doing just simpler, the various matrix envs should be covered in any decent latex introduction. But come to thing of it, the bedt solution is gezas, as it is better semantically
    – daleif
    1 hour ago













up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











    documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{report}
usepackage{amssymb,amsmath,amsthm,latexsym,mathrsfs,amsfonts,dsfont}
usepackage{mathtools, nccmath}

begin{document}
Let $sigma_H(mathbf{T})$ denote the Harte spectrum of $mathbf{T}$
i.e.
$$lambda=(lambda_1,cdots,lambda_d)notin sigma_H(mathbf{T})$$
$$ Updownarrow $$
$$ exists (U_1,cdots,U_d)in mathcal{B}(mathcal{H})^d;text{and};
(V_1,cdots,V_d)in mathcal{B}(mathcal{H})^d ;text{such that};$$
$$sum_{j=1}^dU_j(T_j-lambda_jI)=I;text{and};sum_{j=1}^d(T_j-
lambda_jI)V_j=I.$$

end{document}


I get



enter image description here



I want to get



enter image description here










share|improve this question













    documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{report}
usepackage{amssymb,amsmath,amsthm,latexsym,mathrsfs,amsfonts,dsfont}
usepackage{mathtools, nccmath}

begin{document}
Let $sigma_H(mathbf{T})$ denote the Harte spectrum of $mathbf{T}$
i.e.
$$lambda=(lambda_1,cdots,lambda_d)notin sigma_H(mathbf{T})$$
$$ Updownarrow $$
$$ exists (U_1,cdots,U_d)in mathcal{B}(mathcal{H})^d;text{and};
(V_1,cdots,V_d)in mathcal{B}(mathcal{H})^d ;text{such that};$$
$$sum_{j=1}^dU_j(T_j-lambda_jI)=I;text{and};sum_{j=1}^d(T_j-
lambda_jI)V_j=I.$$

end{document}


I get



enter image description here



I want to get



enter image description here







align






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 2 hours ago









Schüler

24719




24719












  • Your usage of double dollar signs is odd. You should use the LaTeX equivalents, or better something like gather.
    – Johannes_B
    2 hours ago










  • Why not use a bmatrix env, one column
    – daleif
    1 hour ago










  • @daleif Unfortunalety I don't know how to use it. I hope that you provide me an answer.
    – Schüler
    1 hour ago










  • It is the same thing as geza and joule is doing just simpler, the various matrix envs should be covered in any decent latex introduction. But come to thing of it, the bedt solution is gezas, as it is better semantically
    – daleif
    1 hour ago


















  • Your usage of double dollar signs is odd. You should use the LaTeX equivalents, or better something like gather.
    – Johannes_B
    2 hours ago










  • Why not use a bmatrix env, one column
    – daleif
    1 hour ago










  • @daleif Unfortunalety I don't know how to use it. I hope that you provide me an answer.
    – Schüler
    1 hour ago










  • It is the same thing as geza and joule is doing just simpler, the various matrix envs should be covered in any decent latex introduction. But come to thing of it, the bedt solution is gezas, as it is better semantically
    – daleif
    1 hour ago
















Your usage of double dollar signs is odd. You should use the LaTeX equivalents, or better something like gather.
– Johannes_B
2 hours ago




Your usage of double dollar signs is odd. You should use the LaTeX equivalents, or better something like gather.
– Johannes_B
2 hours ago












Why not use a bmatrix env, one column
– daleif
1 hour ago




Why not use a bmatrix env, one column
– daleif
1 hour ago












@daleif Unfortunalety I don't know how to use it. I hope that you provide me an answer.
– Schüler
1 hour ago




@daleif Unfortunalety I don't know how to use it. I hope that you provide me an answer.
– Schüler
1 hour ago












It is the same thing as geza and joule is doing just simpler, the various matrix envs should be covered in any decent latex introduction. But come to thing of it, the bedt solution is gezas, as it is better semantically
– daleif
1 hour ago




It is the same thing as geza and joule is doing just simpler, the various matrix envs should be covered in any decent latex introduction. But come to thing of it, the bedt solution is gezas, as it is better semantically
– daleif
1 hour ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote



accepted










Try



documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{report}
usepackage{amssymb,amsmath,amsthm,latexsym,mathrsfs,amsfonts,dsfont}
usepackage{mathtools, nccmath}

begin{document}
Let $sigma_H(mathbf{T})$ denote the Harte spectrum of $mathbf{T}$ i.e.
begin{gather*}
left(lambda=(lambda_1,cdots,lambda_d)notin sigma_H(mathbf{T})right)\
Updownarrow\
left[
begin{gathered}
exists (U_1,cdots,U_d)in mathcal{B}(mathcal{H})^d;text{and};
(V_1,cdots,V_d)in mathcal{B}(mathcal{H})^d ;text{such that};\
sum_{j=1}^dU_j(T_j-lambda_jI)=I;text{and};sum_{j=1}^d(T_j-
lambda_jI)V_j=I.
end{gathered}right]
end{gather*}
end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer




























    up vote
    2
    down vote













    I recommend using [] instead of $$ $$.



    documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{report}
    usepackage{amssymb,amsmath,amsthm,latexsym,mathrsfs,amsfonts,dsfont}
    usepackage{mathtools, nccmath}

    begin{document}
    Let $sigma_H(mathbf{T})$ denote the Harte spectrum of $mathbf{T}$ i.e.
    $$Big(lambda=(lambda_1,cdots,lambda_d)notin sigma_H(mathbf{T})Big)$$
    $$ Updownarrow $$
    $$
    left[
    begin{array}{c}
    exists (U_1,cdots,U_d)inmathcal{B}(mathcal{H})^d;text{and};
    (V_1,cdots,V_d)in mathcal{B}(mathcal{H})^d ;text{such that}\
    displaystylesum_{j=1}^dU_j(T_j-lambda_jI)=I;text{and};sum_{j=1}^d(T_j-
    lambda_jI)V_j=I.
    end{array}
    right]
    $$
    end{document}


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer

















    • 3




      You recommend, but you don't show? How about using an amsmath environment? ;-)
      – Johannes_B
      2 hours ago










    • @Johannes_B I want to show that $$ $$ is also correct. I don't use [ ] because I'm afraid the OP will think that it is impossible to do the same with $$ $$. Anyway, thanks for your feedback!
      – JouleV
      2 hours ago












    • @JouleV Why [] is better that $$ $$?Thanks.
      – Schüler
      2 hours ago










    • @Schüler Why is [ … ] preferable to $$?
      – Johannes_B
      1 hour ago


















    up vote
    2
    down vote













    I wouldn't use parentheses around the top line, it's easy to remove them anyway.



    Before going to the proposed solution, some remarks:





    1. Never, ever, use $$ in LaTeX.

    2. Never, ever, use consecutive display math environments.

    3. Don't load latexsym: its job is already done by amssymb.


    4. amssymb already loads amsfonts.

    5. Dots between commas should be low; using dots will generally give you the right ones (see https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/122497/4427)


    A stylistic remark: using both mathcal and mathscr (from mathrsfs) can confuse readers.



    In the code below I only load amsmath, the other packages are not necessary for this solution.



    documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{report}
    usepackage{amsmath}

    begin{document}

    Let $sigma_H(mathbf{T})$ denote the Harte spectrum of $mathbf{T}$ i.e.
    begin{gather*}
    bigl(lambda=(lambda_1,dots,lambda_d)notin sigma_H(mathbf{T})bigr)\
    Updownarrow\
    left[
    begin{tabular}{c}
    $exists (U_1,dots,U_d)in mathcal{B}(mathcal{H})^d$ and
    $(V_1,dots,V_d)in mathcal{B}(mathcal{H})^d$ such that \
    $displaystylesum_{j=1}^dU_j(T_j-lambda_jI)=I$ and
    $displaystylesum_{j=1}^d(T_j-lambda_jI)V_j=I$.
    end{tabular}
    right]
    end{gather*}

    end{document}


    enter image description here



    Differences from the good answer by GézàLaTeX:




    1. the top line is surrounded by slightly bigger parentheses (but, as said, I think they should be removed);


    2. for the bottom block I think it's better using tabular that frees from juggling with text.







    share|improve this answer





















    • Thank you very much for your great answer. So in my codes of my original document I keep only usepackage{amssymb,amsmath,amsthm,dsfont,mathrsfs} usepackage{mathtools, nccmath} Do you agree with me?
      – Schüler
      27 mins ago










    • @Schüler I find the font provided by dsfont ugly as hell, but that's personal preference. Of course if you use it you never use mathbb.
      – egreg
      22 mins ago










    • So should I delete dsfont? What about usepackage{mathtools, nccmath}? Is it good? I'm beginner in Latex and thank you for your great help.
      – Schüler
      19 mins ago












    • @Schüler If you don't use mathds, then the package is redundant; mathtools offers facilities for typesetting math; nccmath offers others, which I find generally of little use. You can easily discover what packages of this kind you're using or not: remove them and compile again, if they are actually used in the document you'll receive errors. As a general advice: don't copy your friend's template.
      – egreg
      14 mins ago











    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "85"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f466058%2fadd-a-bracket-in-mathematical-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    2
    down vote



    accepted










    Try



    documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{report}
    usepackage{amssymb,amsmath,amsthm,latexsym,mathrsfs,amsfonts,dsfont}
    usepackage{mathtools, nccmath}

    begin{document}
    Let $sigma_H(mathbf{T})$ denote the Harte spectrum of $mathbf{T}$ i.e.
    begin{gather*}
    left(lambda=(lambda_1,cdots,lambda_d)notin sigma_H(mathbf{T})right)\
    Updownarrow\
    left[
    begin{gathered}
    exists (U_1,cdots,U_d)in mathcal{B}(mathcal{H})^d;text{and};
    (V_1,cdots,V_d)in mathcal{B}(mathcal{H})^d ;text{such that};\
    sum_{j=1}^dU_j(T_j-lambda_jI)=I;text{and};sum_{j=1}^d(T_j-
    lambda_jI)V_j=I.
    end{gathered}right]
    end{gather*}
    end{document}


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer

























      up vote
      2
      down vote



      accepted










      Try



      documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{report}
      usepackage{amssymb,amsmath,amsthm,latexsym,mathrsfs,amsfonts,dsfont}
      usepackage{mathtools, nccmath}

      begin{document}
      Let $sigma_H(mathbf{T})$ denote the Harte spectrum of $mathbf{T}$ i.e.
      begin{gather*}
      left(lambda=(lambda_1,cdots,lambda_d)notin sigma_H(mathbf{T})right)\
      Updownarrow\
      left[
      begin{gathered}
      exists (U_1,cdots,U_d)in mathcal{B}(mathcal{H})^d;text{and};
      (V_1,cdots,V_d)in mathcal{B}(mathcal{H})^d ;text{such that};\
      sum_{j=1}^dU_j(T_j-lambda_jI)=I;text{and};sum_{j=1}^d(T_j-
      lambda_jI)V_j=I.
      end{gathered}right]
      end{gather*}
      end{document}


      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer























        up vote
        2
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        2
        down vote



        accepted






        Try



        documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{report}
        usepackage{amssymb,amsmath,amsthm,latexsym,mathrsfs,amsfonts,dsfont}
        usepackage{mathtools, nccmath}

        begin{document}
        Let $sigma_H(mathbf{T})$ denote the Harte spectrum of $mathbf{T}$ i.e.
        begin{gather*}
        left(lambda=(lambda_1,cdots,lambda_d)notin sigma_H(mathbf{T})right)\
        Updownarrow\
        left[
        begin{gathered}
        exists (U_1,cdots,U_d)in mathcal{B}(mathcal{H})^d;text{and};
        (V_1,cdots,V_d)in mathcal{B}(mathcal{H})^d ;text{such that};\
        sum_{j=1}^dU_j(T_j-lambda_jI)=I;text{and};sum_{j=1}^d(T_j-
        lambda_jI)V_j=I.
        end{gathered}right]
        end{gather*}
        end{document}


        enter image description here






        share|improve this answer












        Try



        documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{report}
        usepackage{amssymb,amsmath,amsthm,latexsym,mathrsfs,amsfonts,dsfont}
        usepackage{mathtools, nccmath}

        begin{document}
        Let $sigma_H(mathbf{T})$ denote the Harte spectrum of $mathbf{T}$ i.e.
        begin{gather*}
        left(lambda=(lambda_1,cdots,lambda_d)notin sigma_H(mathbf{T})right)\
        Updownarrow\
        left[
        begin{gathered}
        exists (U_1,cdots,U_d)in mathcal{B}(mathcal{H})^d;text{and};
        (V_1,cdots,V_d)in mathcal{B}(mathcal{H})^d ;text{such that};\
        sum_{j=1}^dU_j(T_j-lambda_jI)=I;text{and};sum_{j=1}^d(T_j-
        lambda_jI)V_j=I.
        end{gathered}right]
        end{gather*}
        end{document}


        enter image description here







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 2 hours ago









        GézàLaTeX

        3536




        3536






















            up vote
            2
            down vote













            I recommend using [] instead of $$ $$.



            documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{report}
            usepackage{amssymb,amsmath,amsthm,latexsym,mathrsfs,amsfonts,dsfont}
            usepackage{mathtools, nccmath}

            begin{document}
            Let $sigma_H(mathbf{T})$ denote the Harte spectrum of $mathbf{T}$ i.e.
            $$Big(lambda=(lambda_1,cdots,lambda_d)notin sigma_H(mathbf{T})Big)$$
            $$ Updownarrow $$
            $$
            left[
            begin{array}{c}
            exists (U_1,cdots,U_d)inmathcal{B}(mathcal{H})^d;text{and};
            (V_1,cdots,V_d)in mathcal{B}(mathcal{H})^d ;text{such that}\
            displaystylesum_{j=1}^dU_j(T_j-lambda_jI)=I;text{and};sum_{j=1}^d(T_j-
            lambda_jI)V_j=I.
            end{array}
            right]
            $$
            end{document}


            enter image description here






            share|improve this answer

















            • 3




              You recommend, but you don't show? How about using an amsmath environment? ;-)
              – Johannes_B
              2 hours ago










            • @Johannes_B I want to show that $$ $$ is also correct. I don't use [ ] because I'm afraid the OP will think that it is impossible to do the same with $$ $$. Anyway, thanks for your feedback!
              – JouleV
              2 hours ago












            • @JouleV Why [] is better that $$ $$?Thanks.
              – Schüler
              2 hours ago










            • @Schüler Why is [ … ] preferable to $$?
              – Johannes_B
              1 hour ago















            up vote
            2
            down vote













            I recommend using [] instead of $$ $$.



            documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{report}
            usepackage{amssymb,amsmath,amsthm,latexsym,mathrsfs,amsfonts,dsfont}
            usepackage{mathtools, nccmath}

            begin{document}
            Let $sigma_H(mathbf{T})$ denote the Harte spectrum of $mathbf{T}$ i.e.
            $$Big(lambda=(lambda_1,cdots,lambda_d)notin sigma_H(mathbf{T})Big)$$
            $$ Updownarrow $$
            $$
            left[
            begin{array}{c}
            exists (U_1,cdots,U_d)inmathcal{B}(mathcal{H})^d;text{and};
            (V_1,cdots,V_d)in mathcal{B}(mathcal{H})^d ;text{such that}\
            displaystylesum_{j=1}^dU_j(T_j-lambda_jI)=I;text{and};sum_{j=1}^d(T_j-
            lambda_jI)V_j=I.
            end{array}
            right]
            $$
            end{document}


            enter image description here






            share|improve this answer

















            • 3




              You recommend, but you don't show? How about using an amsmath environment? ;-)
              – Johannes_B
              2 hours ago










            • @Johannes_B I want to show that $$ $$ is also correct. I don't use [ ] because I'm afraid the OP will think that it is impossible to do the same with $$ $$. Anyway, thanks for your feedback!
              – JouleV
              2 hours ago












            • @JouleV Why [] is better that $$ $$?Thanks.
              – Schüler
              2 hours ago










            • @Schüler Why is [ … ] preferable to $$?
              – Johannes_B
              1 hour ago













            up vote
            2
            down vote










            up vote
            2
            down vote









            I recommend using [] instead of $$ $$.



            documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{report}
            usepackage{amssymb,amsmath,amsthm,latexsym,mathrsfs,amsfonts,dsfont}
            usepackage{mathtools, nccmath}

            begin{document}
            Let $sigma_H(mathbf{T})$ denote the Harte spectrum of $mathbf{T}$ i.e.
            $$Big(lambda=(lambda_1,cdots,lambda_d)notin sigma_H(mathbf{T})Big)$$
            $$ Updownarrow $$
            $$
            left[
            begin{array}{c}
            exists (U_1,cdots,U_d)inmathcal{B}(mathcal{H})^d;text{and};
            (V_1,cdots,V_d)in mathcal{B}(mathcal{H})^d ;text{such that}\
            displaystylesum_{j=1}^dU_j(T_j-lambda_jI)=I;text{and};sum_{j=1}^d(T_j-
            lambda_jI)V_j=I.
            end{array}
            right]
            $$
            end{document}


            enter image description here






            share|improve this answer












            I recommend using [] instead of $$ $$.



            documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{report}
            usepackage{amssymb,amsmath,amsthm,latexsym,mathrsfs,amsfonts,dsfont}
            usepackage{mathtools, nccmath}

            begin{document}
            Let $sigma_H(mathbf{T})$ denote the Harte spectrum of $mathbf{T}$ i.e.
            $$Big(lambda=(lambda_1,cdots,lambda_d)notin sigma_H(mathbf{T})Big)$$
            $$ Updownarrow $$
            $$
            left[
            begin{array}{c}
            exists (U_1,cdots,U_d)inmathcal{B}(mathcal{H})^d;text{and};
            (V_1,cdots,V_d)in mathcal{B}(mathcal{H})^d ;text{such that}\
            displaystylesum_{j=1}^dU_j(T_j-lambda_jI)=I;text{and};sum_{j=1}^d(T_j-
            lambda_jI)V_j=I.
            end{array}
            right]
            $$
            end{document}


            enter image description here







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 2 hours ago









            JouleV

            1,799425




            1,799425








            • 3




              You recommend, but you don't show? How about using an amsmath environment? ;-)
              – Johannes_B
              2 hours ago










            • @Johannes_B I want to show that $$ $$ is also correct. I don't use [ ] because I'm afraid the OP will think that it is impossible to do the same with $$ $$. Anyway, thanks for your feedback!
              – JouleV
              2 hours ago












            • @JouleV Why [] is better that $$ $$?Thanks.
              – Schüler
              2 hours ago










            • @Schüler Why is [ … ] preferable to $$?
              – Johannes_B
              1 hour ago














            • 3




              You recommend, but you don't show? How about using an amsmath environment? ;-)
              – Johannes_B
              2 hours ago










            • @Johannes_B I want to show that $$ $$ is also correct. I don't use [ ] because I'm afraid the OP will think that it is impossible to do the same with $$ $$. Anyway, thanks for your feedback!
              – JouleV
              2 hours ago












            • @JouleV Why [] is better that $$ $$?Thanks.
              – Schüler
              2 hours ago










            • @Schüler Why is [ … ] preferable to $$?
              – Johannes_B
              1 hour ago








            3




            3




            You recommend, but you don't show? How about using an amsmath environment? ;-)
            – Johannes_B
            2 hours ago




            You recommend, but you don't show? How about using an amsmath environment? ;-)
            – Johannes_B
            2 hours ago












            @Johannes_B I want to show that $$ $$ is also correct. I don't use [ ] because I'm afraid the OP will think that it is impossible to do the same with $$ $$. Anyway, thanks for your feedback!
            – JouleV
            2 hours ago






            @Johannes_B I want to show that $$ $$ is also correct. I don't use [ ] because I'm afraid the OP will think that it is impossible to do the same with $$ $$. Anyway, thanks for your feedback!
            – JouleV
            2 hours ago














            @JouleV Why [] is better that $$ $$?Thanks.
            – Schüler
            2 hours ago




            @JouleV Why [] is better that $$ $$?Thanks.
            – Schüler
            2 hours ago












            @Schüler Why is [ … ] preferable to $$?
            – Johannes_B
            1 hour ago




            @Schüler Why is [ … ] preferable to $$?
            – Johannes_B
            1 hour ago










            up vote
            2
            down vote













            I wouldn't use parentheses around the top line, it's easy to remove them anyway.



            Before going to the proposed solution, some remarks:





            1. Never, ever, use $$ in LaTeX.

            2. Never, ever, use consecutive display math environments.

            3. Don't load latexsym: its job is already done by amssymb.


            4. amssymb already loads amsfonts.

            5. Dots between commas should be low; using dots will generally give you the right ones (see https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/122497/4427)


            A stylistic remark: using both mathcal and mathscr (from mathrsfs) can confuse readers.



            In the code below I only load amsmath, the other packages are not necessary for this solution.



            documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{report}
            usepackage{amsmath}

            begin{document}

            Let $sigma_H(mathbf{T})$ denote the Harte spectrum of $mathbf{T}$ i.e.
            begin{gather*}
            bigl(lambda=(lambda_1,dots,lambda_d)notin sigma_H(mathbf{T})bigr)\
            Updownarrow\
            left[
            begin{tabular}{c}
            $exists (U_1,dots,U_d)in mathcal{B}(mathcal{H})^d$ and
            $(V_1,dots,V_d)in mathcal{B}(mathcal{H})^d$ such that \
            $displaystylesum_{j=1}^dU_j(T_j-lambda_jI)=I$ and
            $displaystylesum_{j=1}^d(T_j-lambda_jI)V_j=I$.
            end{tabular}
            right]
            end{gather*}

            end{document}


            enter image description here



            Differences from the good answer by GézàLaTeX:




            1. the top line is surrounded by slightly bigger parentheses (but, as said, I think they should be removed);


            2. for the bottom block I think it's better using tabular that frees from juggling with text.







            share|improve this answer





















            • Thank you very much for your great answer. So in my codes of my original document I keep only usepackage{amssymb,amsmath,amsthm,dsfont,mathrsfs} usepackage{mathtools, nccmath} Do you agree with me?
              – Schüler
              27 mins ago










            • @Schüler I find the font provided by dsfont ugly as hell, but that's personal preference. Of course if you use it you never use mathbb.
              – egreg
              22 mins ago










            • So should I delete dsfont? What about usepackage{mathtools, nccmath}? Is it good? I'm beginner in Latex and thank you for your great help.
              – Schüler
              19 mins ago












            • @Schüler If you don't use mathds, then the package is redundant; mathtools offers facilities for typesetting math; nccmath offers others, which I find generally of little use. You can easily discover what packages of this kind you're using or not: remove them and compile again, if they are actually used in the document you'll receive errors. As a general advice: don't copy your friend's template.
              – egreg
              14 mins ago















            up vote
            2
            down vote













            I wouldn't use parentheses around the top line, it's easy to remove them anyway.



            Before going to the proposed solution, some remarks:





            1. Never, ever, use $$ in LaTeX.

            2. Never, ever, use consecutive display math environments.

            3. Don't load latexsym: its job is already done by amssymb.


            4. amssymb already loads amsfonts.

            5. Dots between commas should be low; using dots will generally give you the right ones (see https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/122497/4427)


            A stylistic remark: using both mathcal and mathscr (from mathrsfs) can confuse readers.



            In the code below I only load amsmath, the other packages are not necessary for this solution.



            documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{report}
            usepackage{amsmath}

            begin{document}

            Let $sigma_H(mathbf{T})$ denote the Harte spectrum of $mathbf{T}$ i.e.
            begin{gather*}
            bigl(lambda=(lambda_1,dots,lambda_d)notin sigma_H(mathbf{T})bigr)\
            Updownarrow\
            left[
            begin{tabular}{c}
            $exists (U_1,dots,U_d)in mathcal{B}(mathcal{H})^d$ and
            $(V_1,dots,V_d)in mathcal{B}(mathcal{H})^d$ such that \
            $displaystylesum_{j=1}^dU_j(T_j-lambda_jI)=I$ and
            $displaystylesum_{j=1}^d(T_j-lambda_jI)V_j=I$.
            end{tabular}
            right]
            end{gather*}

            end{document}


            enter image description here



            Differences from the good answer by GézàLaTeX:




            1. the top line is surrounded by slightly bigger parentheses (but, as said, I think they should be removed);


            2. for the bottom block I think it's better using tabular that frees from juggling with text.







            share|improve this answer





















            • Thank you very much for your great answer. So in my codes of my original document I keep only usepackage{amssymb,amsmath,amsthm,dsfont,mathrsfs} usepackage{mathtools, nccmath} Do you agree with me?
              – Schüler
              27 mins ago










            • @Schüler I find the font provided by dsfont ugly as hell, but that's personal preference. Of course if you use it you never use mathbb.
              – egreg
              22 mins ago










            • So should I delete dsfont? What about usepackage{mathtools, nccmath}? Is it good? I'm beginner in Latex and thank you for your great help.
              – Schüler
              19 mins ago












            • @Schüler If you don't use mathds, then the package is redundant; mathtools offers facilities for typesetting math; nccmath offers others, which I find generally of little use. You can easily discover what packages of this kind you're using or not: remove them and compile again, if they are actually used in the document you'll receive errors. As a general advice: don't copy your friend's template.
              – egreg
              14 mins ago













            up vote
            2
            down vote










            up vote
            2
            down vote









            I wouldn't use parentheses around the top line, it's easy to remove them anyway.



            Before going to the proposed solution, some remarks:





            1. Never, ever, use $$ in LaTeX.

            2. Never, ever, use consecutive display math environments.

            3. Don't load latexsym: its job is already done by amssymb.


            4. amssymb already loads amsfonts.

            5. Dots between commas should be low; using dots will generally give you the right ones (see https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/122497/4427)


            A stylistic remark: using both mathcal and mathscr (from mathrsfs) can confuse readers.



            In the code below I only load amsmath, the other packages are not necessary for this solution.



            documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{report}
            usepackage{amsmath}

            begin{document}

            Let $sigma_H(mathbf{T})$ denote the Harte spectrum of $mathbf{T}$ i.e.
            begin{gather*}
            bigl(lambda=(lambda_1,dots,lambda_d)notin sigma_H(mathbf{T})bigr)\
            Updownarrow\
            left[
            begin{tabular}{c}
            $exists (U_1,dots,U_d)in mathcal{B}(mathcal{H})^d$ and
            $(V_1,dots,V_d)in mathcal{B}(mathcal{H})^d$ such that \
            $displaystylesum_{j=1}^dU_j(T_j-lambda_jI)=I$ and
            $displaystylesum_{j=1}^d(T_j-lambda_jI)V_j=I$.
            end{tabular}
            right]
            end{gather*}

            end{document}


            enter image description here



            Differences from the good answer by GézàLaTeX:




            1. the top line is surrounded by slightly bigger parentheses (but, as said, I think they should be removed);


            2. for the bottom block I think it's better using tabular that frees from juggling with text.







            share|improve this answer












            I wouldn't use parentheses around the top line, it's easy to remove them anyway.



            Before going to the proposed solution, some remarks:





            1. Never, ever, use $$ in LaTeX.

            2. Never, ever, use consecutive display math environments.

            3. Don't load latexsym: its job is already done by amssymb.


            4. amssymb already loads amsfonts.

            5. Dots between commas should be low; using dots will generally give you the right ones (see https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/122497/4427)


            A stylistic remark: using both mathcal and mathscr (from mathrsfs) can confuse readers.



            In the code below I only load amsmath, the other packages are not necessary for this solution.



            documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{report}
            usepackage{amsmath}

            begin{document}

            Let $sigma_H(mathbf{T})$ denote the Harte spectrum of $mathbf{T}$ i.e.
            begin{gather*}
            bigl(lambda=(lambda_1,dots,lambda_d)notin sigma_H(mathbf{T})bigr)\
            Updownarrow\
            left[
            begin{tabular}{c}
            $exists (U_1,dots,U_d)in mathcal{B}(mathcal{H})^d$ and
            $(V_1,dots,V_d)in mathcal{B}(mathcal{H})^d$ such that \
            $displaystylesum_{j=1}^dU_j(T_j-lambda_jI)=I$ and
            $displaystylesum_{j=1}^d(T_j-lambda_jI)V_j=I$.
            end{tabular}
            right]
            end{gather*}

            end{document}


            enter image description here



            Differences from the good answer by GézàLaTeX:




            1. the top line is surrounded by slightly bigger parentheses (but, as said, I think they should be removed);


            2. for the bottom block I think it's better using tabular that frees from juggling with text.








            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 53 mins ago









            egreg

            705k8618763155




            705k8618763155












            • Thank you very much for your great answer. So in my codes of my original document I keep only usepackage{amssymb,amsmath,amsthm,dsfont,mathrsfs} usepackage{mathtools, nccmath} Do you agree with me?
              – Schüler
              27 mins ago










            • @Schüler I find the font provided by dsfont ugly as hell, but that's personal preference. Of course if you use it you never use mathbb.
              – egreg
              22 mins ago










            • So should I delete dsfont? What about usepackage{mathtools, nccmath}? Is it good? I'm beginner in Latex and thank you for your great help.
              – Schüler
              19 mins ago












            • @Schüler If you don't use mathds, then the package is redundant; mathtools offers facilities for typesetting math; nccmath offers others, which I find generally of little use. You can easily discover what packages of this kind you're using or not: remove them and compile again, if they are actually used in the document you'll receive errors. As a general advice: don't copy your friend's template.
              – egreg
              14 mins ago


















            • Thank you very much for your great answer. So in my codes of my original document I keep only usepackage{amssymb,amsmath,amsthm,dsfont,mathrsfs} usepackage{mathtools, nccmath} Do you agree with me?
              – Schüler
              27 mins ago










            • @Schüler I find the font provided by dsfont ugly as hell, but that's personal preference. Of course if you use it you never use mathbb.
              – egreg
              22 mins ago










            • So should I delete dsfont? What about usepackage{mathtools, nccmath}? Is it good? I'm beginner in Latex and thank you for your great help.
              – Schüler
              19 mins ago












            • @Schüler If you don't use mathds, then the package is redundant; mathtools offers facilities for typesetting math; nccmath offers others, which I find generally of little use. You can easily discover what packages of this kind you're using or not: remove them and compile again, if they are actually used in the document you'll receive errors. As a general advice: don't copy your friend's template.
              – egreg
              14 mins ago
















            Thank you very much for your great answer. So in my codes of my original document I keep only usepackage{amssymb,amsmath,amsthm,dsfont,mathrsfs} usepackage{mathtools, nccmath} Do you agree with me?
            – Schüler
            27 mins ago




            Thank you very much for your great answer. So in my codes of my original document I keep only usepackage{amssymb,amsmath,amsthm,dsfont,mathrsfs} usepackage{mathtools, nccmath} Do you agree with me?
            – Schüler
            27 mins ago












            @Schüler I find the font provided by dsfont ugly as hell, but that's personal preference. Of course if you use it you never use mathbb.
            – egreg
            22 mins ago




            @Schüler I find the font provided by dsfont ugly as hell, but that's personal preference. Of course if you use it you never use mathbb.
            – egreg
            22 mins ago












            So should I delete dsfont? What about usepackage{mathtools, nccmath}? Is it good? I'm beginner in Latex and thank you for your great help.
            – Schüler
            19 mins ago






            So should I delete dsfont? What about usepackage{mathtools, nccmath}? Is it good? I'm beginner in Latex and thank you for your great help.
            – Schüler
            19 mins ago














            @Schüler If you don't use mathds, then the package is redundant; mathtools offers facilities for typesetting math; nccmath offers others, which I find generally of little use. You can easily discover what packages of this kind you're using or not: remove them and compile again, if they are actually used in the document you'll receive errors. As a general advice: don't copy your friend's template.
            – egreg
            14 mins ago




            @Schüler If you don't use mathds, then the package is redundant; mathtools offers facilities for typesetting math; nccmath offers others, which I find generally of little use. You can easily discover what packages of this kind you're using or not: remove them and compile again, if they are actually used in the document you'll receive errors. As a general advice: don't copy your friend's template.
            – egreg
            14 mins ago


















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f466058%2fadd-a-bracket-in-mathematical-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Ellipse (mathématiques)

            Quarter-circle Tiles

            Mont Emei