Can a finite group act freely (as homeomorphisms) on $mathbb R^n$











up vote
10
down vote

favorite
4












I am asking if whether or not a finite group acts freely (as homeomorphisms) on $mathbb R^n$.



To answer in the negative, it suffices to show: for any homeomorphism $f$ such that $f^d=text{id}_{mathbb R^n}$, then $f$ has a fixed point.



I am looking for a complete self-contained answer.










share|cite|improve this question




























    up vote
    10
    down vote

    favorite
    4












    I am asking if whether or not a finite group acts freely (as homeomorphisms) on $mathbb R^n$.



    To answer in the negative, it suffices to show: for any homeomorphism $f$ such that $f^d=text{id}_{mathbb R^n}$, then $f$ has a fixed point.



    I am looking for a complete self-contained answer.










    share|cite|improve this question


























      up vote
      10
      down vote

      favorite
      4









      up vote
      10
      down vote

      favorite
      4






      4





      I am asking if whether or not a finite group acts freely (as homeomorphisms) on $mathbb R^n$.



      To answer in the negative, it suffices to show: for any homeomorphism $f$ such that $f^d=text{id}_{mathbb R^n}$, then $f$ has a fixed point.



      I am looking for a complete self-contained answer.










      share|cite|improve this question















      I am asking if whether or not a finite group acts freely (as homeomorphisms) on $mathbb R^n$.



      To answer in the negative, it suffices to show: for any homeomorphism $f$ such that $f^d=text{id}_{mathbb R^n}$, then $f$ has a fixed point.



      I am looking for a complete self-contained answer.







      algebraic-topology






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited May 13 '16 at 7:38







      user99914

















      asked Jan 3 '13 at 0:21









      Ash GX

      536318




      536318






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          7
          down vote



          accepted










          Any continuous map, $f: mathbb R^n rightarrow mathbb R^n$, such that $f^n = text{ id}$ for any natural number $n$ must have a fixed point. The proof is not entirely trivial and there are two ways to do it: either using Smith theory or using algebraic topology (see Bredon, Geometry and Topology, for instance where a scheme for such a proof is laid out). In general, if a group acts freely and properly discontinuously on $mathbb R^n$, it cannot have torsion. This is also the reason that classifying spaces of finite groups are infinite dimensional. For example, the classifying space of $Z/2$ is $Rmathbb P^infty$.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Thanks for your answer. I fixed a small font issue in your answer: italicized text can be marked with single asterisks.
            – user53153
            Jan 3 '13 at 0:42








          • 4




            That "also the reason that classifying spaces of finite groups are infinite dimensional" doesn't seem to hold water. There's no reason that the universal cover of such a group needs to look like $mathbb{R}^n$.
            – Qiaochu Yuan
            Jan 3 '13 at 1:05










          • I am actually more interested in the "Smith Theory"(actually the other proof was what I have in mind), but I can't find it anywhere. Could you supply some references?
            – Ash GX
            Jan 4 '13 at 0:13


















          up vote
          5
          down vote



          +100










          This is an elaboration of the answer by user44441. Note that none of these proofs is elementary, meaning both use material going beyond what is typically covered in a graduate topology class, although the proof using cohomological dimension is much simpler, you just need to know sheaf cohomology and some basic material of cohomology of groups.




          1. Via Smith Theory. Let $G$ be a finite nontrivial group of homeomorphisms of $R^n$. Then the action of $G$ extends continuously to its action on $S^n$, the 1-point compactification of $R^n$. Let $C< G$ be a nontrivial cyclic subgroup of $G$, it has order $k>1$. Let $p$ be a prime divisor of $k$. Then $C$ contains a subgroup $H$ of order $p$, isomorphic to ${mathbb Z}/p$, cyclic group of order $p$. According to the Smith Theory, see Theorem 7.11 in


          G.Bredon, "Introduction to Compact Transformation Groups", Elsevier, 1972.



          the fixed point set $F$ of $H$ is a Chech cohomology sphere over $p$ of some dimension $rin [-1, n]$. In other words, the Chech cohomology groups $H^i(F, {mathbb Z}/p)$ are isomorphic to that of the sphere $S^r$, where $(-1)$-dimensional sphere is the empty set. In order to use this result, you do not need to know what Chech cohomology is (just for the record, it is the sheaf cohomology with respect to the constant sheaf $underline{{mathbb Z}/p}$ on $F$), as in our situation, if $H$ acts freely on $R^n$, the set $F$ is the singleton ${infty}$ and its Chech cohomology is the same as any cohomology you are are likely familiar with (singular/cellular/simplicial/cubical). The cohomology of the singleton (with ${mathbb Z}/p$ coefficients) is zero in all degrees except degree zero, and $H^0(F, {mathbb Z}/p)cong {mathbb Z}/p$. But no sphere (empty or not) can have such cohomology groups:
          Again, you do not need to know what Chech cohomology is since for topological manifolds it is isomorphic to the cellular/singular/... cohomology. Hence, a free nontrivial finite group action on $R^n$ cannot exist.




          1. Via group cohomology. If $Gtimes R^nto R^n$ is a free action of a finite group, the projection $R^nto X=R^n/G$ is a covering map. Hence, the space $X$ is $K(G,1)$. Therefore, $H^*(X, {mathcal F})cong H^*(G, M)$ for any $ZG$-module $M$, where ${mathcal F}$ is the sheaf on $X$ associated with the module $M$. (To construct this sheaf, take the locally trivial fiber bundle $Eto X$ associated with the $ZG$-module $M$ regarded as a set acted upon by $G$, and consider the sheaf of locally constant local sections of $Eto X$.)


          Now the proof hinges upon two facts:



          a. For every nontrivial finite group $G$ there is a $ZG$-module $M$ and an infinite sequence $k_ito infty$ such that
          $$
          H^{k_i}(G, M)ne 0.
          $$
          You can find this in Ken Brown's book "Cohomology of Groups".
          In our setting, you only need to know this for finite cyclic groups $G$. In this situation, instead of reading Brown's book you can read his freely available lecture notes here, Exercise 1.5: You take $M=ZG$.



          b. If $X$ is a, say, metrizable, topological space of covering dimension $le n$, then for any sheaf ${mathcal F}$ on $X$, the cohomology groups $H^k(X, {mathcal F})=0$ for all $k>n$. Once you get through the definitions, this is actually a "soft" fact, since the covering dimension assumption gives you a cofinal sequence of coverings of $X$ whose nerves are of dimension $le n$ and, hence, the cochain groups defined using these covering vanish (in degrees $>n$), which implies vanishing of cohomology groups. Assuming that you are familiar with simplicial cohomology, this proof is the same as of the fact that for an $n$-dimensional simplicial complex $X$, its simplicial cohomology vanish in degrees $>n$. Since $R^n$ has covering dimension $le n$ (you only need to know that the covering dimension is $le n$, which is proven by constructing an explicit cofinal sequence of covers ${mathcal U}$), the space $X$ covered by $R^n$ also has dimension $le n$, simply by projecting ${mathcal U}$'s from $R^n$ to $X$.



          Now, adding (a) and (b), you conclude that $H^k(R^n/G, {mathcal F})=0$ for all $k>n$ and all sheaves ${mathcal F}$ (from (b)) while
          $H^{k_i}(R^n/G, {mathcal F})ne 0$ for some sequence $k_ito infty$ (from (a)) and for some sheaf ${mathcal F}$. This is a contradiction.






          share|cite|improve this answer






























            up vote
            2
            down vote













            If $G$ acts freely and continuously on $mathbb{R}^n$ then the quotient map $mathbb{R}^n to mathbb{R}^n/G=X$ is a covering map of degree $n=|G|$. Hence we have for the Euler characteristic (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler_characteristic#Covering_spaces),
            $$ chi(X) cdot n=chi(mathbb{R}^n)=1.$$
            Since the Euler characterstic is an integer, this implies that $G$ is trivial.






            share|cite|improve this answer





















              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f269486%2fcan-a-finite-group-act-freely-as-homeomorphisms-on-mathbb-rn%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes








              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes








              up vote
              7
              down vote



              accepted










              Any continuous map, $f: mathbb R^n rightarrow mathbb R^n$, such that $f^n = text{ id}$ for any natural number $n$ must have a fixed point. The proof is not entirely trivial and there are two ways to do it: either using Smith theory or using algebraic topology (see Bredon, Geometry and Topology, for instance where a scheme for such a proof is laid out). In general, if a group acts freely and properly discontinuously on $mathbb R^n$, it cannot have torsion. This is also the reason that classifying spaces of finite groups are infinite dimensional. For example, the classifying space of $Z/2$ is $Rmathbb P^infty$.






              share|cite|improve this answer























              • Thanks for your answer. I fixed a small font issue in your answer: italicized text can be marked with single asterisks.
                – user53153
                Jan 3 '13 at 0:42








              • 4




                That "also the reason that classifying spaces of finite groups are infinite dimensional" doesn't seem to hold water. There's no reason that the universal cover of such a group needs to look like $mathbb{R}^n$.
                – Qiaochu Yuan
                Jan 3 '13 at 1:05










              • I am actually more interested in the "Smith Theory"(actually the other proof was what I have in mind), but I can't find it anywhere. Could you supply some references?
                – Ash GX
                Jan 4 '13 at 0:13















              up vote
              7
              down vote



              accepted










              Any continuous map, $f: mathbb R^n rightarrow mathbb R^n$, such that $f^n = text{ id}$ for any natural number $n$ must have a fixed point. The proof is not entirely trivial and there are two ways to do it: either using Smith theory or using algebraic topology (see Bredon, Geometry and Topology, for instance where a scheme for such a proof is laid out). In general, if a group acts freely and properly discontinuously on $mathbb R^n$, it cannot have torsion. This is also the reason that classifying spaces of finite groups are infinite dimensional. For example, the classifying space of $Z/2$ is $Rmathbb P^infty$.






              share|cite|improve this answer























              • Thanks for your answer. I fixed a small font issue in your answer: italicized text can be marked with single asterisks.
                – user53153
                Jan 3 '13 at 0:42








              • 4




                That "also the reason that classifying spaces of finite groups are infinite dimensional" doesn't seem to hold water. There's no reason that the universal cover of such a group needs to look like $mathbb{R}^n$.
                – Qiaochu Yuan
                Jan 3 '13 at 1:05










              • I am actually more interested in the "Smith Theory"(actually the other proof was what I have in mind), but I can't find it anywhere. Could you supply some references?
                – Ash GX
                Jan 4 '13 at 0:13













              up vote
              7
              down vote



              accepted







              up vote
              7
              down vote



              accepted






              Any continuous map, $f: mathbb R^n rightarrow mathbb R^n$, such that $f^n = text{ id}$ for any natural number $n$ must have a fixed point. The proof is not entirely trivial and there are two ways to do it: either using Smith theory or using algebraic topology (see Bredon, Geometry and Topology, for instance where a scheme for such a proof is laid out). In general, if a group acts freely and properly discontinuously on $mathbb R^n$, it cannot have torsion. This is also the reason that classifying spaces of finite groups are infinite dimensional. For example, the classifying space of $Z/2$ is $Rmathbb P^infty$.






              share|cite|improve this answer














              Any continuous map, $f: mathbb R^n rightarrow mathbb R^n$, such that $f^n = text{ id}$ for any natural number $n$ must have a fixed point. The proof is not entirely trivial and there are two ways to do it: either using Smith theory or using algebraic topology (see Bredon, Geometry and Topology, for instance where a scheme for such a proof is laid out). In general, if a group acts freely and properly discontinuously on $mathbb R^n$, it cannot have torsion. This is also the reason that classifying spaces of finite groups are infinite dimensional. For example, the classifying space of $Z/2$ is $Rmathbb P^infty$.







              share|cite|improve this answer














              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer








              edited Jan 3 '13 at 0:40







              user53153

















              answered Jan 3 '13 at 0:35









              user44441

              897169




              897169












              • Thanks for your answer. I fixed a small font issue in your answer: italicized text can be marked with single asterisks.
                – user53153
                Jan 3 '13 at 0:42








              • 4




                That "also the reason that classifying spaces of finite groups are infinite dimensional" doesn't seem to hold water. There's no reason that the universal cover of such a group needs to look like $mathbb{R}^n$.
                – Qiaochu Yuan
                Jan 3 '13 at 1:05










              • I am actually more interested in the "Smith Theory"(actually the other proof was what I have in mind), but I can't find it anywhere. Could you supply some references?
                – Ash GX
                Jan 4 '13 at 0:13


















              • Thanks for your answer. I fixed a small font issue in your answer: italicized text can be marked with single asterisks.
                – user53153
                Jan 3 '13 at 0:42








              • 4




                That "also the reason that classifying spaces of finite groups are infinite dimensional" doesn't seem to hold water. There's no reason that the universal cover of such a group needs to look like $mathbb{R}^n$.
                – Qiaochu Yuan
                Jan 3 '13 at 1:05










              • I am actually more interested in the "Smith Theory"(actually the other proof was what I have in mind), but I can't find it anywhere. Could you supply some references?
                – Ash GX
                Jan 4 '13 at 0:13
















              Thanks for your answer. I fixed a small font issue in your answer: italicized text can be marked with single asterisks.
              – user53153
              Jan 3 '13 at 0:42






              Thanks for your answer. I fixed a small font issue in your answer: italicized text can be marked with single asterisks.
              – user53153
              Jan 3 '13 at 0:42






              4




              4




              That "also the reason that classifying spaces of finite groups are infinite dimensional" doesn't seem to hold water. There's no reason that the universal cover of such a group needs to look like $mathbb{R}^n$.
              – Qiaochu Yuan
              Jan 3 '13 at 1:05




              That "also the reason that classifying spaces of finite groups are infinite dimensional" doesn't seem to hold water. There's no reason that the universal cover of such a group needs to look like $mathbb{R}^n$.
              – Qiaochu Yuan
              Jan 3 '13 at 1:05












              I am actually more interested in the "Smith Theory"(actually the other proof was what I have in mind), but I can't find it anywhere. Could you supply some references?
              – Ash GX
              Jan 4 '13 at 0:13




              I am actually more interested in the "Smith Theory"(actually the other proof was what I have in mind), but I can't find it anywhere. Could you supply some references?
              – Ash GX
              Jan 4 '13 at 0:13










              up vote
              5
              down vote



              +100










              This is an elaboration of the answer by user44441. Note that none of these proofs is elementary, meaning both use material going beyond what is typically covered in a graduate topology class, although the proof using cohomological dimension is much simpler, you just need to know sheaf cohomology and some basic material of cohomology of groups.




              1. Via Smith Theory. Let $G$ be a finite nontrivial group of homeomorphisms of $R^n$. Then the action of $G$ extends continuously to its action on $S^n$, the 1-point compactification of $R^n$. Let $C< G$ be a nontrivial cyclic subgroup of $G$, it has order $k>1$. Let $p$ be a prime divisor of $k$. Then $C$ contains a subgroup $H$ of order $p$, isomorphic to ${mathbb Z}/p$, cyclic group of order $p$. According to the Smith Theory, see Theorem 7.11 in


              G.Bredon, "Introduction to Compact Transformation Groups", Elsevier, 1972.



              the fixed point set $F$ of $H$ is a Chech cohomology sphere over $p$ of some dimension $rin [-1, n]$. In other words, the Chech cohomology groups $H^i(F, {mathbb Z}/p)$ are isomorphic to that of the sphere $S^r$, where $(-1)$-dimensional sphere is the empty set. In order to use this result, you do not need to know what Chech cohomology is (just for the record, it is the sheaf cohomology with respect to the constant sheaf $underline{{mathbb Z}/p}$ on $F$), as in our situation, if $H$ acts freely on $R^n$, the set $F$ is the singleton ${infty}$ and its Chech cohomology is the same as any cohomology you are are likely familiar with (singular/cellular/simplicial/cubical). The cohomology of the singleton (with ${mathbb Z}/p$ coefficients) is zero in all degrees except degree zero, and $H^0(F, {mathbb Z}/p)cong {mathbb Z}/p$. But no sphere (empty or not) can have such cohomology groups:
              Again, you do not need to know what Chech cohomology is since for topological manifolds it is isomorphic to the cellular/singular/... cohomology. Hence, a free nontrivial finite group action on $R^n$ cannot exist.




              1. Via group cohomology. If $Gtimes R^nto R^n$ is a free action of a finite group, the projection $R^nto X=R^n/G$ is a covering map. Hence, the space $X$ is $K(G,1)$. Therefore, $H^*(X, {mathcal F})cong H^*(G, M)$ for any $ZG$-module $M$, where ${mathcal F}$ is the sheaf on $X$ associated with the module $M$. (To construct this sheaf, take the locally trivial fiber bundle $Eto X$ associated with the $ZG$-module $M$ regarded as a set acted upon by $G$, and consider the sheaf of locally constant local sections of $Eto X$.)


              Now the proof hinges upon two facts:



              a. For every nontrivial finite group $G$ there is a $ZG$-module $M$ and an infinite sequence $k_ito infty$ such that
              $$
              H^{k_i}(G, M)ne 0.
              $$
              You can find this in Ken Brown's book "Cohomology of Groups".
              In our setting, you only need to know this for finite cyclic groups $G$. In this situation, instead of reading Brown's book you can read his freely available lecture notes here, Exercise 1.5: You take $M=ZG$.



              b. If $X$ is a, say, metrizable, topological space of covering dimension $le n$, then for any sheaf ${mathcal F}$ on $X$, the cohomology groups $H^k(X, {mathcal F})=0$ for all $k>n$. Once you get through the definitions, this is actually a "soft" fact, since the covering dimension assumption gives you a cofinal sequence of coverings of $X$ whose nerves are of dimension $le n$ and, hence, the cochain groups defined using these covering vanish (in degrees $>n$), which implies vanishing of cohomology groups. Assuming that you are familiar with simplicial cohomology, this proof is the same as of the fact that for an $n$-dimensional simplicial complex $X$, its simplicial cohomology vanish in degrees $>n$. Since $R^n$ has covering dimension $le n$ (you only need to know that the covering dimension is $le n$, which is proven by constructing an explicit cofinal sequence of covers ${mathcal U}$), the space $X$ covered by $R^n$ also has dimension $le n$, simply by projecting ${mathcal U}$'s from $R^n$ to $X$.



              Now, adding (a) and (b), you conclude that $H^k(R^n/G, {mathcal F})=0$ for all $k>n$ and all sheaves ${mathcal F}$ (from (b)) while
              $H^{k_i}(R^n/G, {mathcal F})ne 0$ for some sequence $k_ito infty$ (from (a)) and for some sheaf ${mathcal F}$. This is a contradiction.






              share|cite|improve this answer



























                up vote
                5
                down vote



                +100










                This is an elaboration of the answer by user44441. Note that none of these proofs is elementary, meaning both use material going beyond what is typically covered in a graduate topology class, although the proof using cohomological dimension is much simpler, you just need to know sheaf cohomology and some basic material of cohomology of groups.




                1. Via Smith Theory. Let $G$ be a finite nontrivial group of homeomorphisms of $R^n$. Then the action of $G$ extends continuously to its action on $S^n$, the 1-point compactification of $R^n$. Let $C< G$ be a nontrivial cyclic subgroup of $G$, it has order $k>1$. Let $p$ be a prime divisor of $k$. Then $C$ contains a subgroup $H$ of order $p$, isomorphic to ${mathbb Z}/p$, cyclic group of order $p$. According to the Smith Theory, see Theorem 7.11 in


                G.Bredon, "Introduction to Compact Transformation Groups", Elsevier, 1972.



                the fixed point set $F$ of $H$ is a Chech cohomology sphere over $p$ of some dimension $rin [-1, n]$. In other words, the Chech cohomology groups $H^i(F, {mathbb Z}/p)$ are isomorphic to that of the sphere $S^r$, where $(-1)$-dimensional sphere is the empty set. In order to use this result, you do not need to know what Chech cohomology is (just for the record, it is the sheaf cohomology with respect to the constant sheaf $underline{{mathbb Z}/p}$ on $F$), as in our situation, if $H$ acts freely on $R^n$, the set $F$ is the singleton ${infty}$ and its Chech cohomology is the same as any cohomology you are are likely familiar with (singular/cellular/simplicial/cubical). The cohomology of the singleton (with ${mathbb Z}/p$ coefficients) is zero in all degrees except degree zero, and $H^0(F, {mathbb Z}/p)cong {mathbb Z}/p$. But no sphere (empty or not) can have such cohomology groups:
                Again, you do not need to know what Chech cohomology is since for topological manifolds it is isomorphic to the cellular/singular/... cohomology. Hence, a free nontrivial finite group action on $R^n$ cannot exist.




                1. Via group cohomology. If $Gtimes R^nto R^n$ is a free action of a finite group, the projection $R^nto X=R^n/G$ is a covering map. Hence, the space $X$ is $K(G,1)$. Therefore, $H^*(X, {mathcal F})cong H^*(G, M)$ for any $ZG$-module $M$, where ${mathcal F}$ is the sheaf on $X$ associated with the module $M$. (To construct this sheaf, take the locally trivial fiber bundle $Eto X$ associated with the $ZG$-module $M$ regarded as a set acted upon by $G$, and consider the sheaf of locally constant local sections of $Eto X$.)


                Now the proof hinges upon two facts:



                a. For every nontrivial finite group $G$ there is a $ZG$-module $M$ and an infinite sequence $k_ito infty$ such that
                $$
                H^{k_i}(G, M)ne 0.
                $$
                You can find this in Ken Brown's book "Cohomology of Groups".
                In our setting, you only need to know this for finite cyclic groups $G$. In this situation, instead of reading Brown's book you can read his freely available lecture notes here, Exercise 1.5: You take $M=ZG$.



                b. If $X$ is a, say, metrizable, topological space of covering dimension $le n$, then for any sheaf ${mathcal F}$ on $X$, the cohomology groups $H^k(X, {mathcal F})=0$ for all $k>n$. Once you get through the definitions, this is actually a "soft" fact, since the covering dimension assumption gives you a cofinal sequence of coverings of $X$ whose nerves are of dimension $le n$ and, hence, the cochain groups defined using these covering vanish (in degrees $>n$), which implies vanishing of cohomology groups. Assuming that you are familiar with simplicial cohomology, this proof is the same as of the fact that for an $n$-dimensional simplicial complex $X$, its simplicial cohomology vanish in degrees $>n$. Since $R^n$ has covering dimension $le n$ (you only need to know that the covering dimension is $le n$, which is proven by constructing an explicit cofinal sequence of covers ${mathcal U}$), the space $X$ covered by $R^n$ also has dimension $le n$, simply by projecting ${mathcal U}$'s from $R^n$ to $X$.



                Now, adding (a) and (b), you conclude that $H^k(R^n/G, {mathcal F})=0$ for all $k>n$ and all sheaves ${mathcal F}$ (from (b)) while
                $H^{k_i}(R^n/G, {mathcal F})ne 0$ for some sequence $k_ito infty$ (from (a)) and for some sheaf ${mathcal F}$. This is a contradiction.






                share|cite|improve this answer

























                  up vote
                  5
                  down vote



                  +100







                  up vote
                  5
                  down vote



                  +100




                  +100




                  This is an elaboration of the answer by user44441. Note that none of these proofs is elementary, meaning both use material going beyond what is typically covered in a graduate topology class, although the proof using cohomological dimension is much simpler, you just need to know sheaf cohomology and some basic material of cohomology of groups.




                  1. Via Smith Theory. Let $G$ be a finite nontrivial group of homeomorphisms of $R^n$. Then the action of $G$ extends continuously to its action on $S^n$, the 1-point compactification of $R^n$. Let $C< G$ be a nontrivial cyclic subgroup of $G$, it has order $k>1$. Let $p$ be a prime divisor of $k$. Then $C$ contains a subgroup $H$ of order $p$, isomorphic to ${mathbb Z}/p$, cyclic group of order $p$. According to the Smith Theory, see Theorem 7.11 in


                  G.Bredon, "Introduction to Compact Transformation Groups", Elsevier, 1972.



                  the fixed point set $F$ of $H$ is a Chech cohomology sphere over $p$ of some dimension $rin [-1, n]$. In other words, the Chech cohomology groups $H^i(F, {mathbb Z}/p)$ are isomorphic to that of the sphere $S^r$, where $(-1)$-dimensional sphere is the empty set. In order to use this result, you do not need to know what Chech cohomology is (just for the record, it is the sheaf cohomology with respect to the constant sheaf $underline{{mathbb Z}/p}$ on $F$), as in our situation, if $H$ acts freely on $R^n$, the set $F$ is the singleton ${infty}$ and its Chech cohomology is the same as any cohomology you are are likely familiar with (singular/cellular/simplicial/cubical). The cohomology of the singleton (with ${mathbb Z}/p$ coefficients) is zero in all degrees except degree zero, and $H^0(F, {mathbb Z}/p)cong {mathbb Z}/p$. But no sphere (empty or not) can have such cohomology groups:
                  Again, you do not need to know what Chech cohomology is since for topological manifolds it is isomorphic to the cellular/singular/... cohomology. Hence, a free nontrivial finite group action on $R^n$ cannot exist.




                  1. Via group cohomology. If $Gtimes R^nto R^n$ is a free action of a finite group, the projection $R^nto X=R^n/G$ is a covering map. Hence, the space $X$ is $K(G,1)$. Therefore, $H^*(X, {mathcal F})cong H^*(G, M)$ for any $ZG$-module $M$, where ${mathcal F}$ is the sheaf on $X$ associated with the module $M$. (To construct this sheaf, take the locally trivial fiber bundle $Eto X$ associated with the $ZG$-module $M$ regarded as a set acted upon by $G$, and consider the sheaf of locally constant local sections of $Eto X$.)


                  Now the proof hinges upon two facts:



                  a. For every nontrivial finite group $G$ there is a $ZG$-module $M$ and an infinite sequence $k_ito infty$ such that
                  $$
                  H^{k_i}(G, M)ne 0.
                  $$
                  You can find this in Ken Brown's book "Cohomology of Groups".
                  In our setting, you only need to know this for finite cyclic groups $G$. In this situation, instead of reading Brown's book you can read his freely available lecture notes here, Exercise 1.5: You take $M=ZG$.



                  b. If $X$ is a, say, metrizable, topological space of covering dimension $le n$, then for any sheaf ${mathcal F}$ on $X$, the cohomology groups $H^k(X, {mathcal F})=0$ for all $k>n$. Once you get through the definitions, this is actually a "soft" fact, since the covering dimension assumption gives you a cofinal sequence of coverings of $X$ whose nerves are of dimension $le n$ and, hence, the cochain groups defined using these covering vanish (in degrees $>n$), which implies vanishing of cohomology groups. Assuming that you are familiar with simplicial cohomology, this proof is the same as of the fact that for an $n$-dimensional simplicial complex $X$, its simplicial cohomology vanish in degrees $>n$. Since $R^n$ has covering dimension $le n$ (you only need to know that the covering dimension is $le n$, which is proven by constructing an explicit cofinal sequence of covers ${mathcal U}$), the space $X$ covered by $R^n$ also has dimension $le n$, simply by projecting ${mathcal U}$'s from $R^n$ to $X$.



                  Now, adding (a) and (b), you conclude that $H^k(R^n/G, {mathcal F})=0$ for all $k>n$ and all sheaves ${mathcal F}$ (from (b)) while
                  $H^{k_i}(R^n/G, {mathcal F})ne 0$ for some sequence $k_ito infty$ (from (a)) and for some sheaf ${mathcal F}$. This is a contradiction.






                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  This is an elaboration of the answer by user44441. Note that none of these proofs is elementary, meaning both use material going beyond what is typically covered in a graduate topology class, although the proof using cohomological dimension is much simpler, you just need to know sheaf cohomology and some basic material of cohomology of groups.




                  1. Via Smith Theory. Let $G$ be a finite nontrivial group of homeomorphisms of $R^n$. Then the action of $G$ extends continuously to its action on $S^n$, the 1-point compactification of $R^n$. Let $C< G$ be a nontrivial cyclic subgroup of $G$, it has order $k>1$. Let $p$ be a prime divisor of $k$. Then $C$ contains a subgroup $H$ of order $p$, isomorphic to ${mathbb Z}/p$, cyclic group of order $p$. According to the Smith Theory, see Theorem 7.11 in


                  G.Bredon, "Introduction to Compact Transformation Groups", Elsevier, 1972.



                  the fixed point set $F$ of $H$ is a Chech cohomology sphere over $p$ of some dimension $rin [-1, n]$. In other words, the Chech cohomology groups $H^i(F, {mathbb Z}/p)$ are isomorphic to that of the sphere $S^r$, where $(-1)$-dimensional sphere is the empty set. In order to use this result, you do not need to know what Chech cohomology is (just for the record, it is the sheaf cohomology with respect to the constant sheaf $underline{{mathbb Z}/p}$ on $F$), as in our situation, if $H$ acts freely on $R^n$, the set $F$ is the singleton ${infty}$ and its Chech cohomology is the same as any cohomology you are are likely familiar with (singular/cellular/simplicial/cubical). The cohomology of the singleton (with ${mathbb Z}/p$ coefficients) is zero in all degrees except degree zero, and $H^0(F, {mathbb Z}/p)cong {mathbb Z}/p$. But no sphere (empty or not) can have such cohomology groups:
                  Again, you do not need to know what Chech cohomology is since for topological manifolds it is isomorphic to the cellular/singular/... cohomology. Hence, a free nontrivial finite group action on $R^n$ cannot exist.




                  1. Via group cohomology. If $Gtimes R^nto R^n$ is a free action of a finite group, the projection $R^nto X=R^n/G$ is a covering map. Hence, the space $X$ is $K(G,1)$. Therefore, $H^*(X, {mathcal F})cong H^*(G, M)$ for any $ZG$-module $M$, where ${mathcal F}$ is the sheaf on $X$ associated with the module $M$. (To construct this sheaf, take the locally trivial fiber bundle $Eto X$ associated with the $ZG$-module $M$ regarded as a set acted upon by $G$, and consider the sheaf of locally constant local sections of $Eto X$.)


                  Now the proof hinges upon two facts:



                  a. For every nontrivial finite group $G$ there is a $ZG$-module $M$ and an infinite sequence $k_ito infty$ such that
                  $$
                  H^{k_i}(G, M)ne 0.
                  $$
                  You can find this in Ken Brown's book "Cohomology of Groups".
                  In our setting, you only need to know this for finite cyclic groups $G$. In this situation, instead of reading Brown's book you can read his freely available lecture notes here, Exercise 1.5: You take $M=ZG$.



                  b. If $X$ is a, say, metrizable, topological space of covering dimension $le n$, then for any sheaf ${mathcal F}$ on $X$, the cohomology groups $H^k(X, {mathcal F})=0$ for all $k>n$. Once you get through the definitions, this is actually a "soft" fact, since the covering dimension assumption gives you a cofinal sequence of coverings of $X$ whose nerves are of dimension $le n$ and, hence, the cochain groups defined using these covering vanish (in degrees $>n$), which implies vanishing of cohomology groups. Assuming that you are familiar with simplicial cohomology, this proof is the same as of the fact that for an $n$-dimensional simplicial complex $X$, its simplicial cohomology vanish in degrees $>n$. Since $R^n$ has covering dimension $le n$ (you only need to know that the covering dimension is $le n$, which is proven by constructing an explicit cofinal sequence of covers ${mathcal U}$), the space $X$ covered by $R^n$ also has dimension $le n$, simply by projecting ${mathcal U}$'s from $R^n$ to $X$.



                  Now, adding (a) and (b), you conclude that $H^k(R^n/G, {mathcal F})=0$ for all $k>n$ and all sheaves ${mathcal F}$ (from (b)) while
                  $H^{k_i}(R^n/G, {mathcal F})ne 0$ for some sequence $k_ito infty$ (from (a)) and for some sheaf ${mathcal F}$. This is a contradiction.







                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited May 12 '16 at 15:25

























                  answered May 12 '16 at 15:17









                  Moishe Cohen

                  45.1k342102




                  45.1k342102






















                      up vote
                      2
                      down vote













                      If $G$ acts freely and continuously on $mathbb{R}^n$ then the quotient map $mathbb{R}^n to mathbb{R}^n/G=X$ is a covering map of degree $n=|G|$. Hence we have for the Euler characteristic (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler_characteristic#Covering_spaces),
                      $$ chi(X) cdot n=chi(mathbb{R}^n)=1.$$
                      Since the Euler characterstic is an integer, this implies that $G$ is trivial.






                      share|cite|improve this answer

























                        up vote
                        2
                        down vote













                        If $G$ acts freely and continuously on $mathbb{R}^n$ then the quotient map $mathbb{R}^n to mathbb{R}^n/G=X$ is a covering map of degree $n=|G|$. Hence we have for the Euler characteristic (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler_characteristic#Covering_spaces),
                        $$ chi(X) cdot n=chi(mathbb{R}^n)=1.$$
                        Since the Euler characterstic is an integer, this implies that $G$ is trivial.






                        share|cite|improve this answer























                          up vote
                          2
                          down vote










                          up vote
                          2
                          down vote









                          If $G$ acts freely and continuously on $mathbb{R}^n$ then the quotient map $mathbb{R}^n to mathbb{R}^n/G=X$ is a covering map of degree $n=|G|$. Hence we have for the Euler characteristic (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler_characteristic#Covering_spaces),
                          $$ chi(X) cdot n=chi(mathbb{R}^n)=1.$$
                          Since the Euler characterstic is an integer, this implies that $G$ is trivial.






                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          If $G$ acts freely and continuously on $mathbb{R}^n$ then the quotient map $mathbb{R}^n to mathbb{R}^n/G=X$ is a covering map of degree $n=|G|$. Hence we have for the Euler characteristic (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler_characteristic#Covering_spaces),
                          $$ chi(X) cdot n=chi(mathbb{R}^n)=1.$$
                          Since the Euler characterstic is an integer, this implies that $G$ is trivial.







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered Nov 22 at 11:27









                          deepfloe

                          514




                          514






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                              Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                              Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f269486%2fcan-a-finite-group-act-freely-as-homeomorphisms-on-mathbb-rn%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Quarter-circle Tiles

                              build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

                              Mont Emei