$tan^2 10^circ+tan^2 50^circ+tan^2 70^circ=9$ [duplicate]












6















This question already has an answer here:




  • Trigonomnetric equality involving tg

    1 answer




Strangest thing...*:



$$tan^2 10^circ+tan^2 50^circ+tan^2 70^circ=9tag{1}$$



The trick, as always, is how to prove it.



My idea was to add a "missing" tangent and analyze a similar expression:



$$tan^2 10^circ+tan^2 30^circ+tan^2 50^circ+tan^2 70^circ$$



...and then to attack this sum pairwise (first and the last term, second and third). Despite the fact that I got the same angle ($80^circ$) here and there, I got pretty much nowhere with this approach.



The other interesting fact is that (1) can be rewritten as:



$$cot^2 20^circ+cot^2 40^circ+cot^2 80^circtag{1}$$



...and now the angles are in nice geometric progression. That's the vector of attack that I'm trying to exploit now, but maybe you can entertain youself a little bit too.



*Borrowed from "Usual suspects"










share|cite|improve this question













marked as duplicate by mathlove, Toby Mak, N. F. Taussig, Jens, Community Nov 24 at 14:18


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.











  • 3




    This is a very similar question.
    – Toby Mak
    Nov 24 at 12:43
















6















This question already has an answer here:




  • Trigonomnetric equality involving tg

    1 answer




Strangest thing...*:



$$tan^2 10^circ+tan^2 50^circ+tan^2 70^circ=9tag{1}$$



The trick, as always, is how to prove it.



My idea was to add a "missing" tangent and analyze a similar expression:



$$tan^2 10^circ+tan^2 30^circ+tan^2 50^circ+tan^2 70^circ$$



...and then to attack this sum pairwise (first and the last term, second and third). Despite the fact that I got the same angle ($80^circ$) here and there, I got pretty much nowhere with this approach.



The other interesting fact is that (1) can be rewritten as:



$$cot^2 20^circ+cot^2 40^circ+cot^2 80^circtag{1}$$



...and now the angles are in nice geometric progression. That's the vector of attack that I'm trying to exploit now, but maybe you can entertain youself a little bit too.



*Borrowed from "Usual suspects"










share|cite|improve this question













marked as duplicate by mathlove, Toby Mak, N. F. Taussig, Jens, Community Nov 24 at 14:18


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.











  • 3




    This is a very similar question.
    – Toby Mak
    Nov 24 at 12:43














6












6








6


1






This question already has an answer here:




  • Trigonomnetric equality involving tg

    1 answer




Strangest thing...*:



$$tan^2 10^circ+tan^2 50^circ+tan^2 70^circ=9tag{1}$$



The trick, as always, is how to prove it.



My idea was to add a "missing" tangent and analyze a similar expression:



$$tan^2 10^circ+tan^2 30^circ+tan^2 50^circ+tan^2 70^circ$$



...and then to attack this sum pairwise (first and the last term, second and third). Despite the fact that I got the same angle ($80^circ$) here and there, I got pretty much nowhere with this approach.



The other interesting fact is that (1) can be rewritten as:



$$cot^2 20^circ+cot^2 40^circ+cot^2 80^circtag{1}$$



...and now the angles are in nice geometric progression. That's the vector of attack that I'm trying to exploit now, but maybe you can entertain youself a little bit too.



*Borrowed from "Usual suspects"










share|cite|improve this question














This question already has an answer here:




  • Trigonomnetric equality involving tg

    1 answer




Strangest thing...*:



$$tan^2 10^circ+tan^2 50^circ+tan^2 70^circ=9tag{1}$$



The trick, as always, is how to prove it.



My idea was to add a "missing" tangent and analyze a similar expression:



$$tan^2 10^circ+tan^2 30^circ+tan^2 50^circ+tan^2 70^circ$$



...and then to attack this sum pairwise (first and the last term, second and third). Despite the fact that I got the same angle ($80^circ$) here and there, I got pretty much nowhere with this approach.



The other interesting fact is that (1) can be rewritten as:



$$cot^2 20^circ+cot^2 40^circ+cot^2 80^circtag{1}$$



...and now the angles are in nice geometric progression. That's the vector of attack that I'm trying to exploit now, but maybe you can entertain youself a little bit too.



*Borrowed from "Usual suspects"





This question already has an answer here:




  • Trigonomnetric equality involving tg

    1 answer








trigonometry






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 24 at 12:28









Oldboy

6,5101630




6,5101630




marked as duplicate by mathlove, Toby Mak, N. F. Taussig, Jens, Community Nov 24 at 14:18


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.






marked as duplicate by mathlove, Toby Mak, N. F. Taussig, Jens, Community Nov 24 at 14:18


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.










  • 3




    This is a very similar question.
    – Toby Mak
    Nov 24 at 12:43














  • 3




    This is a very similar question.
    – Toby Mak
    Nov 24 at 12:43








3




3




This is a very similar question.
– Toby Mak
Nov 24 at 12:43




This is a very similar question.
– Toby Mak
Nov 24 at 12:43










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2














You can write it as
$$cot^220^circ+cot^240^circ+cot^260^circ+cdots+cot^2160^circ=frac{56}3$$
That has eight multiples of $180^circ/9$, and you can find a similar equation for other numbers instead of $9$.






share|cite|improve this answer




























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2














    You can write it as
    $$cot^220^circ+cot^240^circ+cot^260^circ+cdots+cot^2160^circ=frac{56}3$$
    That has eight multiples of $180^circ/9$, and you can find a similar equation for other numbers instead of $9$.






    share|cite|improve this answer


























      2














      You can write it as
      $$cot^220^circ+cot^240^circ+cot^260^circ+cdots+cot^2160^circ=frac{56}3$$
      That has eight multiples of $180^circ/9$, and you can find a similar equation for other numbers instead of $9$.






      share|cite|improve this answer
























        2












        2








        2






        You can write it as
        $$cot^220^circ+cot^240^circ+cot^260^circ+cdots+cot^2160^circ=frac{56}3$$
        That has eight multiples of $180^circ/9$, and you can find a similar equation for other numbers instead of $9$.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        You can write it as
        $$cot^220^circ+cot^240^circ+cot^260^circ+cdots+cot^2160^circ=frac{56}3$$
        That has eight multiples of $180^circ/9$, and you can find a similar equation for other numbers instead of $9$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Nov 24 at 12:53









        Empy2

        33.4k12261




        33.4k12261















            Popular posts from this blog

            Quarter-circle Tiles

            build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

            Mont Emei