Approximate the proportion of integers with neighboring factors











up vote
4
down vote

favorite












If 1 is not counted as a factor, then




  • 40 has two neighboring factors (4 and 5)

  • 1092 has two neighboring factors (13 and 14)

  • 350 does not have two neighboring factors
    (out of its factors 2, 5, 7, 10, 14, 25, 35, 50, 70, and 175,
    no two are consecutive)


The proportion of positive integers that have this property
is the proportion divisible by any of
6 (2 × 3), 12 (3 × 4), 20 (4 × 5), 30, 56, ….
If we only calculate the proportion divisible by the first n of these,
we get an approximation that gets more accurate as n increases.



For example,
for n=1,
we find the proportion of integers divisible by 2 × 3 = 6,
which is 1/6.
For n=2,
all integers divisible by 3 × 4 = 12 are also divisible by 6,
so the approximation is still 1/6.
For n=3,
the proportion of integers divisible by 6 or 20 is 1/5,
and so on.



Here are the first few values:



1  1/6                0.16666666666666666
3 1/5 0.20000000000000000
6 22/105 0.20952380952380953
9 491/2310 0.21255411255411255
12 2153/10010 0.21508491508491510
15 36887/170170 0.21676558735382265
21 65563/301070 0.21776663234463747
24 853883/3913910 0.21816623274423785
27 24796879/113503390 0.21846817967287144


For values of n between the provided values,
the output should be the same as the output for the value above
(e.g. n=5 → 1/5).



Your program should take n and output either a fraction or decimal answer.
You may take n at any offset
(e.g. 0-indexing or 2-indexing into this sequence, instead of 1-indexing).



For decimal output,
your program must be accurate to at least 5 digits
for all the test cases given.



Scoring is code-golf, with the shortest code winning.



Inspired by What proportion of positive integers have two factors that differ by 1? by marty cohen -- specifically, by Dan's answer.










share|improve this question




















  • 1




    How accurate does a decimal answer have to be? A natural strategy seems to be to count the integers with a valid divisor in some enormous range and divide by the length of the range, which gets better as an approximation as the range gets bigger.
    – xnor
    5 hours ago










  • @xnor I've now addressed that in the post.
    – Doorknob
    5 hours ago















up vote
4
down vote

favorite












If 1 is not counted as a factor, then




  • 40 has two neighboring factors (4 and 5)

  • 1092 has two neighboring factors (13 and 14)

  • 350 does not have two neighboring factors
    (out of its factors 2, 5, 7, 10, 14, 25, 35, 50, 70, and 175,
    no two are consecutive)


The proportion of positive integers that have this property
is the proportion divisible by any of
6 (2 × 3), 12 (3 × 4), 20 (4 × 5), 30, 56, ….
If we only calculate the proportion divisible by the first n of these,
we get an approximation that gets more accurate as n increases.



For example,
for n=1,
we find the proportion of integers divisible by 2 × 3 = 6,
which is 1/6.
For n=2,
all integers divisible by 3 × 4 = 12 are also divisible by 6,
so the approximation is still 1/6.
For n=3,
the proportion of integers divisible by 6 or 20 is 1/5,
and so on.



Here are the first few values:



1  1/6                0.16666666666666666
3 1/5 0.20000000000000000
6 22/105 0.20952380952380953
9 491/2310 0.21255411255411255
12 2153/10010 0.21508491508491510
15 36887/170170 0.21676558735382265
21 65563/301070 0.21776663234463747
24 853883/3913910 0.21816623274423785
27 24796879/113503390 0.21846817967287144


For values of n between the provided values,
the output should be the same as the output for the value above
(e.g. n=5 → 1/5).



Your program should take n and output either a fraction or decimal answer.
You may take n at any offset
(e.g. 0-indexing or 2-indexing into this sequence, instead of 1-indexing).



For decimal output,
your program must be accurate to at least 5 digits
for all the test cases given.



Scoring is code-golf, with the shortest code winning.



Inspired by What proportion of positive integers have two factors that differ by 1? by marty cohen -- specifically, by Dan's answer.










share|improve this question




















  • 1




    How accurate does a decimal answer have to be? A natural strategy seems to be to count the integers with a valid divisor in some enormous range and divide by the length of the range, which gets better as an approximation as the range gets bigger.
    – xnor
    5 hours ago










  • @xnor I've now addressed that in the post.
    – Doorknob
    5 hours ago













up vote
4
down vote

favorite









up vote
4
down vote

favorite











If 1 is not counted as a factor, then




  • 40 has two neighboring factors (4 and 5)

  • 1092 has two neighboring factors (13 and 14)

  • 350 does not have two neighboring factors
    (out of its factors 2, 5, 7, 10, 14, 25, 35, 50, 70, and 175,
    no two are consecutive)


The proportion of positive integers that have this property
is the proportion divisible by any of
6 (2 × 3), 12 (3 × 4), 20 (4 × 5), 30, 56, ….
If we only calculate the proportion divisible by the first n of these,
we get an approximation that gets more accurate as n increases.



For example,
for n=1,
we find the proportion of integers divisible by 2 × 3 = 6,
which is 1/6.
For n=2,
all integers divisible by 3 × 4 = 12 are also divisible by 6,
so the approximation is still 1/6.
For n=3,
the proportion of integers divisible by 6 or 20 is 1/5,
and so on.



Here are the first few values:



1  1/6                0.16666666666666666
3 1/5 0.20000000000000000
6 22/105 0.20952380952380953
9 491/2310 0.21255411255411255
12 2153/10010 0.21508491508491510
15 36887/170170 0.21676558735382265
21 65563/301070 0.21776663234463747
24 853883/3913910 0.21816623274423785
27 24796879/113503390 0.21846817967287144


For values of n between the provided values,
the output should be the same as the output for the value above
(e.g. n=5 → 1/5).



Your program should take n and output either a fraction or decimal answer.
You may take n at any offset
(e.g. 0-indexing or 2-indexing into this sequence, instead of 1-indexing).



For decimal output,
your program must be accurate to at least 5 digits
for all the test cases given.



Scoring is code-golf, with the shortest code winning.



Inspired by What proportion of positive integers have two factors that differ by 1? by marty cohen -- specifically, by Dan's answer.










share|improve this question















If 1 is not counted as a factor, then




  • 40 has two neighboring factors (4 and 5)

  • 1092 has two neighboring factors (13 and 14)

  • 350 does not have two neighboring factors
    (out of its factors 2, 5, 7, 10, 14, 25, 35, 50, 70, and 175,
    no two are consecutive)


The proportion of positive integers that have this property
is the proportion divisible by any of
6 (2 × 3), 12 (3 × 4), 20 (4 × 5), 30, 56, ….
If we only calculate the proportion divisible by the first n of these,
we get an approximation that gets more accurate as n increases.



For example,
for n=1,
we find the proportion of integers divisible by 2 × 3 = 6,
which is 1/6.
For n=2,
all integers divisible by 3 × 4 = 12 are also divisible by 6,
so the approximation is still 1/6.
For n=3,
the proportion of integers divisible by 6 or 20 is 1/5,
and so on.



Here are the first few values:



1  1/6                0.16666666666666666
3 1/5 0.20000000000000000
6 22/105 0.20952380952380953
9 491/2310 0.21255411255411255
12 2153/10010 0.21508491508491510
15 36887/170170 0.21676558735382265
21 65563/301070 0.21776663234463747
24 853883/3913910 0.21816623274423785
27 24796879/113503390 0.21846817967287144


For values of n between the provided values,
the output should be the same as the output for the value above
(e.g. n=5 → 1/5).



Your program should take n and output either a fraction or decimal answer.
You may take n at any offset
(e.g. 0-indexing or 2-indexing into this sequence, instead of 1-indexing).



For decimal output,
your program must be accurate to at least 5 digits
for all the test cases given.



Scoring is code-golf, with the shortest code winning.



Inspired by What proportion of positive integers have two factors that differ by 1? by marty cohen -- specifically, by Dan's answer.







code-golf number






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 5 hours ago

























asked 5 hours ago









Doorknob

54k17112342




54k17112342








  • 1




    How accurate does a decimal answer have to be? A natural strategy seems to be to count the integers with a valid divisor in some enormous range and divide by the length of the range, which gets better as an approximation as the range gets bigger.
    – xnor
    5 hours ago










  • @xnor I've now addressed that in the post.
    – Doorknob
    5 hours ago














  • 1




    How accurate does a decimal answer have to be? A natural strategy seems to be to count the integers with a valid divisor in some enormous range and divide by the length of the range, which gets better as an approximation as the range gets bigger.
    – xnor
    5 hours ago










  • @xnor I've now addressed that in the post.
    – Doorknob
    5 hours ago








1




1




How accurate does a decimal answer have to be? A natural strategy seems to be to count the integers with a valid divisor in some enormous range and divide by the length of the range, which gets better as an approximation as the range gets bigger.
– xnor
5 hours ago




How accurate does a decimal answer have to be? A natural strategy seems to be to count the integers with a valid divisor in some enormous range and divide by the length of the range, which gets better as an approximation as the range gets bigger.
– xnor
5 hours ago












@xnor I've now addressed that in the post.
– Doorknob
5 hours ago




@xnor I've now addressed that in the post.
– Doorknob
5 hours ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote














Jelly, 15 bytes



‘€×‘$ḍẸ¥Ɱæl/$Æm


Try it online!






share|improve this answer




























    up vote
    1
    down vote













    JavaScript (ES6),  94 92  90 bytes



    Saved 2 bytes thanks to @Shaggy + 2 more bytes from there



    Returns a float.





    n=>(x=2,g=a=>n--?g([...a,x*++x]):[...Array(1e6)].map((_,k)=>n+=a.some(d=>k%d<1))&&n/1e6)``


    Try it online!





    JavaScript (ES6), 131 bytes



    A much longer solution that returns an exact result as a pair $[numerator, denominator]$.





    f=(n,a=,p=x=1)=>n?f(n-1,[...a,q=++x*-~x],p*q/(g=(a,b)=>a?g(b%a,a):b)(p,q)):[...Array(p)].map((_,k)=>n+=a.some(d=>-~k%d<1))&&[n,p]


    Try it online!






    share|improve this answer



















    • 1




      -2 bytes
      – Shaggy
      3 hours ago


















    up vote
    0
    down vote














    Charcoal, 26 bytes



    FN⊞υ×⁺²ι⁺³ιI∕LΦΠυ¬⌊Eυ﹪ιλΠυ


    Try it online! Link is to verbose version of code. Hopelessly inefficient (O(n!²)) so only works up to n=4 on TIO. Explanation:



    FN⊞υ×⁺²ι⁺³ι


    Input n and calculate the first n products of neighbouring factors.



    I∕LΦΠυ¬⌊Eυ﹪ιλΠυ


    Take the product of all of those factors and use that to calculate the proportion of numbers having at least one of those factors.



    30-byte less slow version is only O(n!) so can do up to n=6 on TIO:



    F⊕N⊞υ⁺²ιI∕LΦΠυΣEυ∧μ¬﹪ι×λ§υ⊖μΠυ


    Try it online! Link is to verbose version of code.



    46-byte faster version is only O(lcm(1..n+2)) so can do up to n=10 on TIO:



    FN⊞υ×⁺²ι⁺³ι≔⁰η≔⁰ζW∨¬η⌈Eυ﹪ηκ«≦⊕η≧⁺⌈Eυ¬﹪ηκζ»I∕ζη


    Try it online! Link is to verbose version of code.






    share|improve this answer






























      up vote
      0
      down vote














      Jelly,  14  13 bytes



      -1 using Erik the Outgolfer's idea to take the mean of a list of zeros and ones.



      +2µḊPƝḍⱮ!Ẹ€Æm


      A monadic Link accepting an integer which yields a float.



      Try it online! (very inefficient since it tests divisibility over the range of $(n+2)!$)



      (Previous was +2µḊPƝḍⱮ!§T,$Ẉ yielding [numerator, denominator], unreduced)



      How?



      +2µḊPƝḍⱮ!Ẹ€Æm - Link: integer, n
      +2 - add 2
      µ - new monadic chain, call that x
      Ḋ - dequeue (implicit range of) x
      Ɲ - apply to neighbours:
      P - product
      ! - factorial of x = x!
      Ɱ - map across (implicit range of) x! with:
      ḍ - divides?
      Ẹ€ - any? for each (1 if divisible by any of the neighbour products else 0)
      Æm - mean





      share|improve this answer























        Your Answer





        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
        });
        });
        }, "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
        StackExchange.snippets.init();
        });
        });
        }, "code-snippets");

        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "200"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        convertImagesToLinks: false,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: null,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });














        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodegolf.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f177668%2fapproximate-the-proportion-of-integers-with-neighboring-factors%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes








        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes








        up vote
        1
        down vote














        Jelly, 15 bytes



        ‘€×‘$ḍẸ¥Ɱæl/$Æm


        Try it online!






        share|improve this answer

























          up vote
          1
          down vote














          Jelly, 15 bytes



          ‘€×‘$ḍẸ¥Ɱæl/$Æm


          Try it online!






          share|improve this answer























            up vote
            1
            down vote










            up vote
            1
            down vote










            Jelly, 15 bytes



            ‘€×‘$ḍẸ¥Ɱæl/$Æm


            Try it online!






            share|improve this answer













            Jelly, 15 bytes



            ‘€×‘$ḍẸ¥Ɱæl/$Æm


            Try it online!







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 5 hours ago









            Erik the Outgolfer

            31.2k429102




            31.2k429102






















                up vote
                1
                down vote













                JavaScript (ES6),  94 92  90 bytes



                Saved 2 bytes thanks to @Shaggy + 2 more bytes from there



                Returns a float.





                n=>(x=2,g=a=>n--?g([...a,x*++x]):[...Array(1e6)].map((_,k)=>n+=a.some(d=>k%d<1))&&n/1e6)``


                Try it online!





                JavaScript (ES6), 131 bytes



                A much longer solution that returns an exact result as a pair $[numerator, denominator]$.





                f=(n,a=,p=x=1)=>n?f(n-1,[...a,q=++x*-~x],p*q/(g=(a,b)=>a?g(b%a,a):b)(p,q)):[...Array(p)].map((_,k)=>n+=a.some(d=>-~k%d<1))&&[n,p]


                Try it online!






                share|improve this answer



















                • 1




                  -2 bytes
                  – Shaggy
                  3 hours ago















                up vote
                1
                down vote













                JavaScript (ES6),  94 92  90 bytes



                Saved 2 bytes thanks to @Shaggy + 2 more bytes from there



                Returns a float.





                n=>(x=2,g=a=>n--?g([...a,x*++x]):[...Array(1e6)].map((_,k)=>n+=a.some(d=>k%d<1))&&n/1e6)``


                Try it online!





                JavaScript (ES6), 131 bytes



                A much longer solution that returns an exact result as a pair $[numerator, denominator]$.





                f=(n,a=,p=x=1)=>n?f(n-1,[...a,q=++x*-~x],p*q/(g=(a,b)=>a?g(b%a,a):b)(p,q)):[...Array(p)].map((_,k)=>n+=a.some(d=>-~k%d<1))&&[n,p]


                Try it online!






                share|improve this answer



















                • 1




                  -2 bytes
                  – Shaggy
                  3 hours ago













                up vote
                1
                down vote










                up vote
                1
                down vote









                JavaScript (ES6),  94 92  90 bytes



                Saved 2 bytes thanks to @Shaggy + 2 more bytes from there



                Returns a float.





                n=>(x=2,g=a=>n--?g([...a,x*++x]):[...Array(1e6)].map((_,k)=>n+=a.some(d=>k%d<1))&&n/1e6)``


                Try it online!





                JavaScript (ES6), 131 bytes



                A much longer solution that returns an exact result as a pair $[numerator, denominator]$.





                f=(n,a=,p=x=1)=>n?f(n-1,[...a,q=++x*-~x],p*q/(g=(a,b)=>a?g(b%a,a):b)(p,q)):[...Array(p)].map((_,k)=>n+=a.some(d=>-~k%d<1))&&[n,p]


                Try it online!






                share|improve this answer














                JavaScript (ES6),  94 92  90 bytes



                Saved 2 bytes thanks to @Shaggy + 2 more bytes from there



                Returns a float.





                n=>(x=2,g=a=>n--?g([...a,x*++x]):[...Array(1e6)].map((_,k)=>n+=a.some(d=>k%d<1))&&n/1e6)``


                Try it online!





                JavaScript (ES6), 131 bytes



                A much longer solution that returns an exact result as a pair $[numerator, denominator]$.





                f=(n,a=,p=x=1)=>n?f(n-1,[...a,q=++x*-~x],p*q/(g=(a,b)=>a?g(b%a,a):b)(p,q)):[...Array(p)].map((_,k)=>n+=a.some(d=>-~k%d<1))&&[n,p]


                Try it online!







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited 1 hour ago

























                answered 3 hours ago









                Arnauld

                71.6k688299




                71.6k688299








                • 1




                  -2 bytes
                  – Shaggy
                  3 hours ago














                • 1




                  -2 bytes
                  – Shaggy
                  3 hours ago








                1




                1




                -2 bytes
                – Shaggy
                3 hours ago




                -2 bytes
                – Shaggy
                3 hours ago










                up vote
                0
                down vote














                Charcoal, 26 bytes



                FN⊞υ×⁺²ι⁺³ιI∕LΦΠυ¬⌊Eυ﹪ιλΠυ


                Try it online! Link is to verbose version of code. Hopelessly inefficient (O(n!²)) so only works up to n=4 on TIO. Explanation:



                FN⊞υ×⁺²ι⁺³ι


                Input n and calculate the first n products of neighbouring factors.



                I∕LΦΠυ¬⌊Eυ﹪ιλΠυ


                Take the product of all of those factors and use that to calculate the proportion of numbers having at least one of those factors.



                30-byte less slow version is only O(n!) so can do up to n=6 on TIO:



                F⊕N⊞υ⁺²ιI∕LΦΠυΣEυ∧μ¬﹪ι×λ§υ⊖μΠυ


                Try it online! Link is to verbose version of code.



                46-byte faster version is only O(lcm(1..n+2)) so can do up to n=10 on TIO:



                FN⊞υ×⁺²ι⁺³ι≔⁰η≔⁰ζW∨¬η⌈Eυ﹪ηκ«≦⊕η≧⁺⌈Eυ¬﹪ηκζ»I∕ζη


                Try it online! Link is to verbose version of code.






                share|improve this answer



























                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote














                  Charcoal, 26 bytes



                  FN⊞υ×⁺²ι⁺³ιI∕LΦΠυ¬⌊Eυ﹪ιλΠυ


                  Try it online! Link is to verbose version of code. Hopelessly inefficient (O(n!²)) so only works up to n=4 on TIO. Explanation:



                  FN⊞υ×⁺²ι⁺³ι


                  Input n and calculate the first n products of neighbouring factors.



                  I∕LΦΠυ¬⌊Eυ﹪ιλΠυ


                  Take the product of all of those factors and use that to calculate the proportion of numbers having at least one of those factors.



                  30-byte less slow version is only O(n!) so can do up to n=6 on TIO:



                  F⊕N⊞υ⁺²ιI∕LΦΠυΣEυ∧μ¬﹪ι×λ§υ⊖μΠυ


                  Try it online! Link is to verbose version of code.



                  46-byte faster version is only O(lcm(1..n+2)) so can do up to n=10 on TIO:



                  FN⊞υ×⁺²ι⁺³ι≔⁰η≔⁰ζW∨¬η⌈Eυ﹪ηκ«≦⊕η≧⁺⌈Eυ¬﹪ηκζ»I∕ζη


                  Try it online! Link is to verbose version of code.






                  share|improve this answer

























                    up vote
                    0
                    down vote










                    up vote
                    0
                    down vote










                    Charcoal, 26 bytes



                    FN⊞υ×⁺²ι⁺³ιI∕LΦΠυ¬⌊Eυ﹪ιλΠυ


                    Try it online! Link is to verbose version of code. Hopelessly inefficient (O(n!²)) so only works up to n=4 on TIO. Explanation:



                    FN⊞υ×⁺²ι⁺³ι


                    Input n and calculate the first n products of neighbouring factors.



                    I∕LΦΠυ¬⌊Eυ﹪ιλΠυ


                    Take the product of all of those factors and use that to calculate the proportion of numbers having at least one of those factors.



                    30-byte less slow version is only O(n!) so can do up to n=6 on TIO:



                    F⊕N⊞υ⁺²ιI∕LΦΠυΣEυ∧μ¬﹪ι×λ§υ⊖μΠυ


                    Try it online! Link is to verbose version of code.



                    46-byte faster version is only O(lcm(1..n+2)) so can do up to n=10 on TIO:



                    FN⊞υ×⁺²ι⁺³ι≔⁰η≔⁰ζW∨¬η⌈Eυ﹪ηκ«≦⊕η≧⁺⌈Eυ¬﹪ηκζ»I∕ζη


                    Try it online! Link is to verbose version of code.






                    share|improve this answer















                    Charcoal, 26 bytes



                    FN⊞υ×⁺²ι⁺³ιI∕LΦΠυ¬⌊Eυ﹪ιλΠυ


                    Try it online! Link is to verbose version of code. Hopelessly inefficient (O(n!²)) so only works up to n=4 on TIO. Explanation:



                    FN⊞υ×⁺²ι⁺³ι


                    Input n and calculate the first n products of neighbouring factors.



                    I∕LΦΠυ¬⌊Eυ﹪ιλΠυ


                    Take the product of all of those factors and use that to calculate the proportion of numbers having at least one of those factors.



                    30-byte less slow version is only O(n!) so can do up to n=6 on TIO:



                    F⊕N⊞υ⁺²ιI∕LΦΠυΣEυ∧μ¬﹪ι×λ§υ⊖μΠυ


                    Try it online! Link is to verbose version of code.



                    46-byte faster version is only O(lcm(1..n+2)) so can do up to n=10 on TIO:



                    FN⊞υ×⁺²ι⁺³ι≔⁰η≔⁰ζW∨¬η⌈Eυ﹪ηκ«≦⊕η≧⁺⌈Eυ¬﹪ηκζ»I∕ζη


                    Try it online! Link is to verbose version of code.







                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited 52 mins ago

























                    answered 1 hour ago









                    Neil

                    78.9k744175




                    78.9k744175






















                        up vote
                        0
                        down vote














                        Jelly,  14  13 bytes



                        -1 using Erik the Outgolfer's idea to take the mean of a list of zeros and ones.



                        +2µḊPƝḍⱮ!Ẹ€Æm


                        A monadic Link accepting an integer which yields a float.



                        Try it online! (very inefficient since it tests divisibility over the range of $(n+2)!$)



                        (Previous was +2µḊPƝḍⱮ!§T,$Ẉ yielding [numerator, denominator], unreduced)



                        How?



                        +2µḊPƝḍⱮ!Ẹ€Æm - Link: integer, n
                        +2 - add 2
                        µ - new monadic chain, call that x
                        Ḋ - dequeue (implicit range of) x
                        Ɲ - apply to neighbours:
                        P - product
                        ! - factorial of x = x!
                        Ɱ - map across (implicit range of) x! with:
                        ḍ - divides?
                        Ẹ€ - any? for each (1 if divisible by any of the neighbour products else 0)
                        Æm - mean





                        share|improve this answer



























                          up vote
                          0
                          down vote














                          Jelly,  14  13 bytes



                          -1 using Erik the Outgolfer's idea to take the mean of a list of zeros and ones.



                          +2µḊPƝḍⱮ!Ẹ€Æm


                          A monadic Link accepting an integer which yields a float.



                          Try it online! (very inefficient since it tests divisibility over the range of $(n+2)!$)



                          (Previous was +2µḊPƝḍⱮ!§T,$Ẉ yielding [numerator, denominator], unreduced)



                          How?



                          +2µḊPƝḍⱮ!Ẹ€Æm - Link: integer, n
                          +2 - add 2
                          µ - new monadic chain, call that x
                          Ḋ - dequeue (implicit range of) x
                          Ɲ - apply to neighbours:
                          P - product
                          ! - factorial of x = x!
                          Ɱ - map across (implicit range of) x! with:
                          ḍ - divides?
                          Ẹ€ - any? for each (1 if divisible by any of the neighbour products else 0)
                          Æm - mean





                          share|improve this answer

























                            up vote
                            0
                            down vote










                            up vote
                            0
                            down vote










                            Jelly,  14  13 bytes



                            -1 using Erik the Outgolfer's idea to take the mean of a list of zeros and ones.



                            +2µḊPƝḍⱮ!Ẹ€Æm


                            A monadic Link accepting an integer which yields a float.



                            Try it online! (very inefficient since it tests divisibility over the range of $(n+2)!$)



                            (Previous was +2µḊPƝḍⱮ!§T,$Ẉ yielding [numerator, denominator], unreduced)



                            How?



                            +2µḊPƝḍⱮ!Ẹ€Æm - Link: integer, n
                            +2 - add 2
                            µ - new monadic chain, call that x
                            Ḋ - dequeue (implicit range of) x
                            Ɲ - apply to neighbours:
                            P - product
                            ! - factorial of x = x!
                            Ɱ - map across (implicit range of) x! with:
                            ḍ - divides?
                            Ẹ€ - any? for each (1 if divisible by any of the neighbour products else 0)
                            Æm - mean





                            share|improve this answer















                            Jelly,  14  13 bytes



                            -1 using Erik the Outgolfer's idea to take the mean of a list of zeros and ones.



                            +2µḊPƝḍⱮ!Ẹ€Æm


                            A monadic Link accepting an integer which yields a float.



                            Try it online! (very inefficient since it tests divisibility over the range of $(n+2)!$)



                            (Previous was +2µḊPƝḍⱮ!§T,$Ẉ yielding [numerator, denominator], unreduced)



                            How?



                            +2µḊPƝḍⱮ!Ẹ€Æm - Link: integer, n
                            +2 - add 2
                            µ - new monadic chain, call that x
                            Ḋ - dequeue (implicit range of) x
                            Ɲ - apply to neighbours:
                            P - product
                            ! - factorial of x = x!
                            Ɱ - map across (implicit range of) x! with:
                            ḍ - divides?
                            Ẹ€ - any? for each (1 if divisible by any of the neighbour products else 0)
                            Æm - mean






                            share|improve this answer














                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer








                            edited 43 mins ago

























                            answered 1 hour ago









                            Jonathan Allan

                            50.6k534165




                            50.6k534165






























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded




















































                                If this is an answer to a challenge…




                                • …Be sure to follow the challenge specification. However, please refrain from exploiting obvious loopholes. Answers abusing any of the standard loopholes are considered invalid. If you think a specification is unclear or underspecified, comment on the question instead.


                                • …Try to optimize your score. For instance, answers to code-golf challenges should attempt to be as short as possible. You can always include a readable version of the code in addition to the competitive one.
                                  Explanations of your answer make it more interesting to read and are very much encouraged.


                                • …Include a short header which indicates the language(s) of your code and its score, as defined by the challenge.



                                More generally…




                                • …Please make sure to answer the question and provide sufficient detail.


                                • …Avoid asking for help, clarification or responding to other answers (use comments instead).






                                Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                                Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodegolf.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f177668%2fapproximate-the-proportion-of-integers-with-neighboring-factors%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Ellipse (mathématiques)

                                Quarter-circle Tiles

                                Mont Emei