I tried this question by using pi denoting method and got a big equation what to do











up vote
-1
down vote

favorite
1












Find coefficient of $x^6$ in
$(1+x)(1+x^2)^2.....(1+x^n)^n$










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Please clarify what you mean by 'pi denoting method'
    – Daniel
    Nov 22 at 18:31






  • 1




    I would assume that he is referring to how you can write summations with $sum$ you can write products with $prod$ and so he rewrote the above expression as $prod_{k=1}^n(1+x^k)^k$ but couldn't continue.
    – JMoravitz
    Nov 22 at 18:32










  • Yes I did they same but no further step can be done
    – Noone Noone
    Nov 22 at 18:34






  • 1




    With the numbers as small as they are, I would probably brute force this, noting that the coefficient is the same for all $ngeq 6$ so you might as well look only at $(1+x)(1+x^2)^2cdots (1+x^6)^6$
    – JMoravitz
    Nov 22 at 18:35










  • Yes but don't you think some coefficients would be skipped
    – Noone Noone
    Nov 22 at 18:38















up vote
-1
down vote

favorite
1












Find coefficient of $x^6$ in
$(1+x)(1+x^2)^2.....(1+x^n)^n$










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Please clarify what you mean by 'pi denoting method'
    – Daniel
    Nov 22 at 18:31






  • 1




    I would assume that he is referring to how you can write summations with $sum$ you can write products with $prod$ and so he rewrote the above expression as $prod_{k=1}^n(1+x^k)^k$ but couldn't continue.
    – JMoravitz
    Nov 22 at 18:32










  • Yes I did they same but no further step can be done
    – Noone Noone
    Nov 22 at 18:34






  • 1




    With the numbers as small as they are, I would probably brute force this, noting that the coefficient is the same for all $ngeq 6$ so you might as well look only at $(1+x)(1+x^2)^2cdots (1+x^6)^6$
    – JMoravitz
    Nov 22 at 18:35










  • Yes but don't you think some coefficients would be skipped
    – Noone Noone
    Nov 22 at 18:38













up vote
-1
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
-1
down vote

favorite
1






1





Find coefficient of $x^6$ in
$(1+x)(1+x^2)^2.....(1+x^n)^n$










share|cite|improve this question















Find coefficient of $x^6$ in
$(1+x)(1+x^2)^2.....(1+x^n)^n$







combinatorics binomial-theorem






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 22 at 18:30









Yanko

5,660723




5,660723










asked Nov 22 at 18:29









Noone Noone

11




11












  • Please clarify what you mean by 'pi denoting method'
    – Daniel
    Nov 22 at 18:31






  • 1




    I would assume that he is referring to how you can write summations with $sum$ you can write products with $prod$ and so he rewrote the above expression as $prod_{k=1}^n(1+x^k)^k$ but couldn't continue.
    – JMoravitz
    Nov 22 at 18:32










  • Yes I did they same but no further step can be done
    – Noone Noone
    Nov 22 at 18:34






  • 1




    With the numbers as small as they are, I would probably brute force this, noting that the coefficient is the same for all $ngeq 6$ so you might as well look only at $(1+x)(1+x^2)^2cdots (1+x^6)^6$
    – JMoravitz
    Nov 22 at 18:35










  • Yes but don't you think some coefficients would be skipped
    – Noone Noone
    Nov 22 at 18:38


















  • Please clarify what you mean by 'pi denoting method'
    – Daniel
    Nov 22 at 18:31






  • 1




    I would assume that he is referring to how you can write summations with $sum$ you can write products with $prod$ and so he rewrote the above expression as $prod_{k=1}^n(1+x^k)^k$ but couldn't continue.
    – JMoravitz
    Nov 22 at 18:32










  • Yes I did they same but no further step can be done
    – Noone Noone
    Nov 22 at 18:34






  • 1




    With the numbers as small as they are, I would probably brute force this, noting that the coefficient is the same for all $ngeq 6$ so you might as well look only at $(1+x)(1+x^2)^2cdots (1+x^6)^6$
    – JMoravitz
    Nov 22 at 18:35










  • Yes but don't you think some coefficients would be skipped
    – Noone Noone
    Nov 22 at 18:38
















Please clarify what you mean by 'pi denoting method'
– Daniel
Nov 22 at 18:31




Please clarify what you mean by 'pi denoting method'
– Daniel
Nov 22 at 18:31




1




1




I would assume that he is referring to how you can write summations with $sum$ you can write products with $prod$ and so he rewrote the above expression as $prod_{k=1}^n(1+x^k)^k$ but couldn't continue.
– JMoravitz
Nov 22 at 18:32




I would assume that he is referring to how you can write summations with $sum$ you can write products with $prod$ and so he rewrote the above expression as $prod_{k=1}^n(1+x^k)^k$ but couldn't continue.
– JMoravitz
Nov 22 at 18:32












Yes I did they same but no further step can be done
– Noone Noone
Nov 22 at 18:34




Yes I did they same but no further step can be done
– Noone Noone
Nov 22 at 18:34




1




1




With the numbers as small as they are, I would probably brute force this, noting that the coefficient is the same for all $ngeq 6$ so you might as well look only at $(1+x)(1+x^2)^2cdots (1+x^6)^6$
– JMoravitz
Nov 22 at 18:35




With the numbers as small as they are, I would probably brute force this, noting that the coefficient is the same for all $ngeq 6$ so you might as well look only at $(1+x)(1+x^2)^2cdots (1+x^6)^6$
– JMoravitz
Nov 22 at 18:35












Yes but don't you think some coefficients would be skipped
– Noone Noone
Nov 22 at 18:38




Yes but don't you think some coefficients would be skipped
– Noone Noone
Nov 22 at 18:38










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










A creative approach. $prod_{kgeq 1}(1+x^k)^k$ is the exponential of
$$ sum_{kgeq 1}k log(1+x^k) = sum_{kgeq 1}ksum_{ngeq 1}frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{n} x^{kn}=sum_{mgeq 1}mx^m sum_{dmid m}frac{(-1)^{d+1}}{d^2} $$
or
$$ x+frac{3 x^2}{2}+frac{10 x^3}{3}+frac{11 x^4}{4}+frac{26 x^5}{5}+5 x^6 + O(x^7).$$
Since $exp(z)=1+z+o(z)$, it is enough to look for the coefficient of $x^6$ in
$$ 1+x+2 x^2+5 x^3+8 x^4+16 x^5+color{red}{28}, x^6 + O(x^7).$$
This coefficient can be found also through numerical integration, since it equals
$$ frac{1}{2pi i}oint_{|z|=varepsilon}expleft[z+frac{3 z^2}{2}+frac{10 z^3}{3}+frac{11 z^4}{4}+frac{26 z^5}{5}+5 z^6right]frac{dz}{z^7} $$
(any numerical approximation of this integral within an error $<frac{1}{2}$ does the job, since we know in advance that the value of this monster is a natural number).






share|cite|improve this answer






























    up vote
    1
    down vote













    Your function is effectively a generating function for the number of ways you can express a number as a sequence where the sum of the terms in the sequence is equal to our number and within the first $1$ terms all terms are either $0$ or $1$, within the next $2$ terms all terms are either $0$ or $2$, within the next $3$ terms all terms are either $0$ or $3$, etc... on up to the final $n$ terms where all terms are either $0$ or $n$.



    $underbrace{underline{~}}_{1's}underbrace{underline{~}~underline{~}}_{2's}underbrace{underline{~}~underline{~}~underline{~}}_{3's}cdots underbrace{underline{~}~underline{~}~underline{~}~underline{~}~underline{~}~underline{~}}_{6's}$



    One such sequence might be $underbrace{underline{0}}_{1's}underbrace{underline{0}~underline{0}}_{2's}underbrace{underline{3}~underline{0}~underline{3}}_{3's}cdots underbrace{underline{0}~underline{0}~underline{0}~underline{0}~underline{0}~underline{0}}_{6's}$



    I would break down into cases based on the different ways that you can reach a total of $6$ using at most one $1$'s, at most two $2$'s, at most three $3$'s, etc..., where the terms appear in (non-strictly) increasing order, noting that we may stop at $6$ since if we continue past $6$ the sum would be larger than $6$ if we use any of those terms anyways.



    The ways you can do this are $1+2+3$, $2+4$, $3+3$, $1+5$, $6$. You can check there are no other ways subject to our constraints.



    Now, for each of these, let us figure out the number of ways to select which of the positions in our sequence receive the number in question and which receive the zeroes. For example in the case of $1+2+3$, there is one way to choose where to place the $1$. There are $2$ ways to choose how to place the $2$, and there are $3$ ways to choose how to place the $3$. This gives $1times 2times 3$ ways to have gotten a sum of $6$ using $1$'s, $2$'s and $3$'s and enough other zeroes to fill the spaces in the sequence subject to our constraints.



    Similarly there are $2times 4, 1times 5$ and $6$ ways in the other cases respectively. The only one of our cases which doesn't follow this pattern is the case for $3+3$ which instead has $binom{3}{2}=3$ options for how to distribute the $0$'s instead.



    This gives a grand total of:



    $$1times 2times 3 + 2times 4 + 3 + 1times 5 + 6 = 6+8+3+5+6=28$$






    share|cite|improve this answer





















    • Actually I am 10 std student so is there a simpler method
      – Noone Noone
      Nov 22 at 19:02










    • If by "simpler" you mean "simpler" in terms of theory, yes, you can just expand your product fully... That seems like a terrible idea and waste of time to me though. You can save a bit more time by totally ignoring every term in the expansion and partial expansions where the exponent is larger than $6$ already. Even with that simplification though, this seems incredibly tedious and prone to error.
      – JMoravitz
      Nov 22 at 19:23












    • In terms of simplest in terms of arithmetic, I doubt it gets any easier than what I did above.
      – JMoravitz
      Nov 22 at 19:23


















    up vote
    1
    down vote













    Notet that the coefficient of $x^6$ is
    begin{align}
    sumprod_{k=1}^nbinom k{t_k}
    end{align}

    where the sum is taken over $0leq t_kleq k$ such that $sum_{k=1}^nkt_k=6$.
    Note that $t_k=0$ for $k>6$.
    The only possible sums $sum_{k=1}^6kt_k=6$ are:
    begin{align}
    6=1cdot 0+2cdot 0+3cdot 0+4cdot 0+5cdot 0+6cdot 1\
    6=1cdot 1+2cdot 0+3cdot 0+4cdot 0+5cdot 1+6cdot 0\
    6=1cdot 0+2cdot 1+3cdot 0+4cdot 1+5cdot 0+6cdot 0\
    6=1cdot 0+2cdot 0+3cdot 2+4cdot 0+5cdot 0+6cdot 0\
    6=1cdot 1+2cdot 1+3cdot 1+4cdot 0+5cdot 0+6cdot 0
    end{align}

    consequently, the required coefficient is
    begin{align}
    c
    &=binom 10binom 20binom 30binom 40binom 50binom 61\
    &+binom 11binom 20binom 30binom 40binom 51binom 60\
    &+binom 10binom 21binom 30binom 41binom 50binom 60\
    &+binom 10binom 20binom 32binom 40binom 50binom 60\
    &+binom 11binom 21binom 31binom 40binom 50binom 60\
    &=6+5+8+3+6\
    &=28
    end{align}






    share|cite|improve this answer




























      up vote
      1
      down vote













      Here is my attempt at pitching the answer as simply as possible. Hope it's easy to understand.



      If you want a systematic way of multiplying those then remember that the $k^{text{th}}$ row of Pascal's triangle gives $a_{k,r}$, the coefficients of $x^r$ in the expansion of $(1+x)^k$:



      $$begin{array}{c|cccccccc}
      kbackslash r& x^0 & x^1 & x^2& x^3& x^4& x^5& x^6\hline
      0 & 1 &&&&&&\
      1 & 1 & 1 &&&&&\
      2 & 1 & 2 & 1 &&&&\
      3 & 1 & 3 & 3 & 1 &&&\
      4 & 1 & 4 & 6 & 4 & 1 &&\
      5 & 1 & 5 & 10 & 10 & 5 & 1 &\
      6 & 1 & 6 & 15 & 20 & 15 & 6 & 1end{array}$$



      Remember also that each coefficient in row $k$ column $x^r$ is found by adding the coefficients in the previous row (row $k-1$) in columns $x^r$ and $x^{r-1}$. We represent this with the recurrence



      $$a_{k,r}=a_{k-1,r}+a_{k-1,r-1}$$



      Each row $k$ represents the expansion of $(1+x)times (1+x)^{k-1}$.



      In a similar way we can expand your product



      $$(1+x)(1+x^2)^2(1+x^3)^3cdots (1+x^k)^k$$



      by creating a table of coefficients $b_{k,r}$ in which each row $k$ represents the resulting $x^r$ coefficients $(1+x^k)^k$ multiplied by the polynomial of the previous row.



      Our recurrence is now



      $$b_{k,r}=a_{k,0}b_{k-1,r}+a_{k,1}b_{k-1,r-k}+a_{k,2}b_{k-1,r-2k}+a_{k,3}b_{k-1,r-3k}+cdots$$



      We can produce a table much like with Pascal's recurrence, viz:



      $$begin{array}{c|cccccccc}
      kbackslash r& x^0 & x^1 & x^2& x^3& x^4& x^5& x^6\hline
      0 & 1 &&&&&&\
      1 & 1 & 1 &&&&&\
      2 & 1 & 1 & 2 & 2 & 1 & 1 &\
      3 & 1 & 1 & 2 & 5 & 4 & 7 & 9\
      4 & 1 & 1 & 2 & 5 & 8 & 11 & 17\
      5 & 1 & 1 & 2 & 5 & 8 & 16 & 22\
      6 & 1 & 1 & 2 & 5 & 8 & 16 & 28end{array}$$



      Here the recurrence gives each successive row by multiplying the previous row coefficients by the relevant $a_{k,r}$ values and adding the result.



      Since we only want $x^6$ there is no need to expand past row $6$ column $6$. We find that calculation gets easier with each successive row due to the recurrence ignoring $b_{k-1,r-s}$ terms where $s$ is not a multiple of $k$.



      So our answer is, for all $k$



      begin{array}{c|c}k & b_{k,6}\hline
      0 & 0\
      1 &0\
      2 & 0\
      3 &9\
      4 &17\
      5 &22\
      6 &28\
      7 &28\
      vdots &vdots\end{array}



      clearly the answer stays at $28$ for all $kge 6$.



      Note: I've used $k$ instead of $n$.






      share|cite|improve this answer





















        Your Answer





        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
        });
        });
        }, "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "69"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });














        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3009479%2fi-tried-this-question-by-using-pi-denoting-method-and-got-a-big-equation-what-to%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes








        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes








        up vote
        1
        down vote



        accepted










        A creative approach. $prod_{kgeq 1}(1+x^k)^k$ is the exponential of
        $$ sum_{kgeq 1}k log(1+x^k) = sum_{kgeq 1}ksum_{ngeq 1}frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{n} x^{kn}=sum_{mgeq 1}mx^m sum_{dmid m}frac{(-1)^{d+1}}{d^2} $$
        or
        $$ x+frac{3 x^2}{2}+frac{10 x^3}{3}+frac{11 x^4}{4}+frac{26 x^5}{5}+5 x^6 + O(x^7).$$
        Since $exp(z)=1+z+o(z)$, it is enough to look for the coefficient of $x^6$ in
        $$ 1+x+2 x^2+5 x^3+8 x^4+16 x^5+color{red}{28}, x^6 + O(x^7).$$
        This coefficient can be found also through numerical integration, since it equals
        $$ frac{1}{2pi i}oint_{|z|=varepsilon}expleft[z+frac{3 z^2}{2}+frac{10 z^3}{3}+frac{11 z^4}{4}+frac{26 z^5}{5}+5 z^6right]frac{dz}{z^7} $$
        (any numerical approximation of this integral within an error $<frac{1}{2}$ does the job, since we know in advance that the value of this monster is a natural number).






        share|cite|improve this answer



























          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          A creative approach. $prod_{kgeq 1}(1+x^k)^k$ is the exponential of
          $$ sum_{kgeq 1}k log(1+x^k) = sum_{kgeq 1}ksum_{ngeq 1}frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{n} x^{kn}=sum_{mgeq 1}mx^m sum_{dmid m}frac{(-1)^{d+1}}{d^2} $$
          or
          $$ x+frac{3 x^2}{2}+frac{10 x^3}{3}+frac{11 x^4}{4}+frac{26 x^5}{5}+5 x^6 + O(x^7).$$
          Since $exp(z)=1+z+o(z)$, it is enough to look for the coefficient of $x^6$ in
          $$ 1+x+2 x^2+5 x^3+8 x^4+16 x^5+color{red}{28}, x^6 + O(x^7).$$
          This coefficient can be found also through numerical integration, since it equals
          $$ frac{1}{2pi i}oint_{|z|=varepsilon}expleft[z+frac{3 z^2}{2}+frac{10 z^3}{3}+frac{11 z^4}{4}+frac{26 z^5}{5}+5 z^6right]frac{dz}{z^7} $$
          (any numerical approximation of this integral within an error $<frac{1}{2}$ does the job, since we know in advance that the value of this monster is a natural number).






          share|cite|improve this answer

























            up vote
            1
            down vote



            accepted







            up vote
            1
            down vote



            accepted






            A creative approach. $prod_{kgeq 1}(1+x^k)^k$ is the exponential of
            $$ sum_{kgeq 1}k log(1+x^k) = sum_{kgeq 1}ksum_{ngeq 1}frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{n} x^{kn}=sum_{mgeq 1}mx^m sum_{dmid m}frac{(-1)^{d+1}}{d^2} $$
            or
            $$ x+frac{3 x^2}{2}+frac{10 x^3}{3}+frac{11 x^4}{4}+frac{26 x^5}{5}+5 x^6 + O(x^7).$$
            Since $exp(z)=1+z+o(z)$, it is enough to look for the coefficient of $x^6$ in
            $$ 1+x+2 x^2+5 x^3+8 x^4+16 x^5+color{red}{28}, x^6 + O(x^7).$$
            This coefficient can be found also through numerical integration, since it equals
            $$ frac{1}{2pi i}oint_{|z|=varepsilon}expleft[z+frac{3 z^2}{2}+frac{10 z^3}{3}+frac{11 z^4}{4}+frac{26 z^5}{5}+5 z^6right]frac{dz}{z^7} $$
            (any numerical approximation of this integral within an error $<frac{1}{2}$ does the job, since we know in advance that the value of this monster is a natural number).






            share|cite|improve this answer














            A creative approach. $prod_{kgeq 1}(1+x^k)^k$ is the exponential of
            $$ sum_{kgeq 1}k log(1+x^k) = sum_{kgeq 1}ksum_{ngeq 1}frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{n} x^{kn}=sum_{mgeq 1}mx^m sum_{dmid m}frac{(-1)^{d+1}}{d^2} $$
            or
            $$ x+frac{3 x^2}{2}+frac{10 x^3}{3}+frac{11 x^4}{4}+frac{26 x^5}{5}+5 x^6 + O(x^7).$$
            Since $exp(z)=1+z+o(z)$, it is enough to look for the coefficient of $x^6$ in
            $$ 1+x+2 x^2+5 x^3+8 x^4+16 x^5+color{red}{28}, x^6 + O(x^7).$$
            This coefficient can be found also through numerical integration, since it equals
            $$ frac{1}{2pi i}oint_{|z|=varepsilon}expleft[z+frac{3 z^2}{2}+frac{10 z^3}{3}+frac{11 z^4}{4}+frac{26 z^5}{5}+5 z^6right]frac{dz}{z^7} $$
            (any numerical approximation of this integral within an error $<frac{1}{2}$ does the job, since we know in advance that the value of this monster is a natural number).







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Nov 22 at 20:17

























            answered Nov 22 at 19:37









            Jack D'Aurizio

            285k33275654




            285k33275654






















                up vote
                1
                down vote













                Your function is effectively a generating function for the number of ways you can express a number as a sequence where the sum of the terms in the sequence is equal to our number and within the first $1$ terms all terms are either $0$ or $1$, within the next $2$ terms all terms are either $0$ or $2$, within the next $3$ terms all terms are either $0$ or $3$, etc... on up to the final $n$ terms where all terms are either $0$ or $n$.



                $underbrace{underline{~}}_{1's}underbrace{underline{~}~underline{~}}_{2's}underbrace{underline{~}~underline{~}~underline{~}}_{3's}cdots underbrace{underline{~}~underline{~}~underline{~}~underline{~}~underline{~}~underline{~}}_{6's}$



                One such sequence might be $underbrace{underline{0}}_{1's}underbrace{underline{0}~underline{0}}_{2's}underbrace{underline{3}~underline{0}~underline{3}}_{3's}cdots underbrace{underline{0}~underline{0}~underline{0}~underline{0}~underline{0}~underline{0}}_{6's}$



                I would break down into cases based on the different ways that you can reach a total of $6$ using at most one $1$'s, at most two $2$'s, at most three $3$'s, etc..., where the terms appear in (non-strictly) increasing order, noting that we may stop at $6$ since if we continue past $6$ the sum would be larger than $6$ if we use any of those terms anyways.



                The ways you can do this are $1+2+3$, $2+4$, $3+3$, $1+5$, $6$. You can check there are no other ways subject to our constraints.



                Now, for each of these, let us figure out the number of ways to select which of the positions in our sequence receive the number in question and which receive the zeroes. For example in the case of $1+2+3$, there is one way to choose where to place the $1$. There are $2$ ways to choose how to place the $2$, and there are $3$ ways to choose how to place the $3$. This gives $1times 2times 3$ ways to have gotten a sum of $6$ using $1$'s, $2$'s and $3$'s and enough other zeroes to fill the spaces in the sequence subject to our constraints.



                Similarly there are $2times 4, 1times 5$ and $6$ ways in the other cases respectively. The only one of our cases which doesn't follow this pattern is the case for $3+3$ which instead has $binom{3}{2}=3$ options for how to distribute the $0$'s instead.



                This gives a grand total of:



                $$1times 2times 3 + 2times 4 + 3 + 1times 5 + 6 = 6+8+3+5+6=28$$






                share|cite|improve this answer





















                • Actually I am 10 std student so is there a simpler method
                  – Noone Noone
                  Nov 22 at 19:02










                • If by "simpler" you mean "simpler" in terms of theory, yes, you can just expand your product fully... That seems like a terrible idea and waste of time to me though. You can save a bit more time by totally ignoring every term in the expansion and partial expansions where the exponent is larger than $6$ already. Even with that simplification though, this seems incredibly tedious and prone to error.
                  – JMoravitz
                  Nov 22 at 19:23












                • In terms of simplest in terms of arithmetic, I doubt it gets any easier than what I did above.
                  – JMoravitz
                  Nov 22 at 19:23















                up vote
                1
                down vote













                Your function is effectively a generating function for the number of ways you can express a number as a sequence where the sum of the terms in the sequence is equal to our number and within the first $1$ terms all terms are either $0$ or $1$, within the next $2$ terms all terms are either $0$ or $2$, within the next $3$ terms all terms are either $0$ or $3$, etc... on up to the final $n$ terms where all terms are either $0$ or $n$.



                $underbrace{underline{~}}_{1's}underbrace{underline{~}~underline{~}}_{2's}underbrace{underline{~}~underline{~}~underline{~}}_{3's}cdots underbrace{underline{~}~underline{~}~underline{~}~underline{~}~underline{~}~underline{~}}_{6's}$



                One such sequence might be $underbrace{underline{0}}_{1's}underbrace{underline{0}~underline{0}}_{2's}underbrace{underline{3}~underline{0}~underline{3}}_{3's}cdots underbrace{underline{0}~underline{0}~underline{0}~underline{0}~underline{0}~underline{0}}_{6's}$



                I would break down into cases based on the different ways that you can reach a total of $6$ using at most one $1$'s, at most two $2$'s, at most three $3$'s, etc..., where the terms appear in (non-strictly) increasing order, noting that we may stop at $6$ since if we continue past $6$ the sum would be larger than $6$ if we use any of those terms anyways.



                The ways you can do this are $1+2+3$, $2+4$, $3+3$, $1+5$, $6$. You can check there are no other ways subject to our constraints.



                Now, for each of these, let us figure out the number of ways to select which of the positions in our sequence receive the number in question and which receive the zeroes. For example in the case of $1+2+3$, there is one way to choose where to place the $1$. There are $2$ ways to choose how to place the $2$, and there are $3$ ways to choose how to place the $3$. This gives $1times 2times 3$ ways to have gotten a sum of $6$ using $1$'s, $2$'s and $3$'s and enough other zeroes to fill the spaces in the sequence subject to our constraints.



                Similarly there are $2times 4, 1times 5$ and $6$ ways in the other cases respectively. The only one of our cases which doesn't follow this pattern is the case for $3+3$ which instead has $binom{3}{2}=3$ options for how to distribute the $0$'s instead.



                This gives a grand total of:



                $$1times 2times 3 + 2times 4 + 3 + 1times 5 + 6 = 6+8+3+5+6=28$$






                share|cite|improve this answer





















                • Actually I am 10 std student so is there a simpler method
                  – Noone Noone
                  Nov 22 at 19:02










                • If by "simpler" you mean "simpler" in terms of theory, yes, you can just expand your product fully... That seems like a terrible idea and waste of time to me though. You can save a bit more time by totally ignoring every term in the expansion and partial expansions where the exponent is larger than $6$ already. Even with that simplification though, this seems incredibly tedious and prone to error.
                  – JMoravitz
                  Nov 22 at 19:23












                • In terms of simplest in terms of arithmetic, I doubt it gets any easier than what I did above.
                  – JMoravitz
                  Nov 22 at 19:23













                up vote
                1
                down vote










                up vote
                1
                down vote









                Your function is effectively a generating function for the number of ways you can express a number as a sequence where the sum of the terms in the sequence is equal to our number and within the first $1$ terms all terms are either $0$ or $1$, within the next $2$ terms all terms are either $0$ or $2$, within the next $3$ terms all terms are either $0$ or $3$, etc... on up to the final $n$ terms where all terms are either $0$ or $n$.



                $underbrace{underline{~}}_{1's}underbrace{underline{~}~underline{~}}_{2's}underbrace{underline{~}~underline{~}~underline{~}}_{3's}cdots underbrace{underline{~}~underline{~}~underline{~}~underline{~}~underline{~}~underline{~}}_{6's}$



                One such sequence might be $underbrace{underline{0}}_{1's}underbrace{underline{0}~underline{0}}_{2's}underbrace{underline{3}~underline{0}~underline{3}}_{3's}cdots underbrace{underline{0}~underline{0}~underline{0}~underline{0}~underline{0}~underline{0}}_{6's}$



                I would break down into cases based on the different ways that you can reach a total of $6$ using at most one $1$'s, at most two $2$'s, at most three $3$'s, etc..., where the terms appear in (non-strictly) increasing order, noting that we may stop at $6$ since if we continue past $6$ the sum would be larger than $6$ if we use any of those terms anyways.



                The ways you can do this are $1+2+3$, $2+4$, $3+3$, $1+5$, $6$. You can check there are no other ways subject to our constraints.



                Now, for each of these, let us figure out the number of ways to select which of the positions in our sequence receive the number in question and which receive the zeroes. For example in the case of $1+2+3$, there is one way to choose where to place the $1$. There are $2$ ways to choose how to place the $2$, and there are $3$ ways to choose how to place the $3$. This gives $1times 2times 3$ ways to have gotten a sum of $6$ using $1$'s, $2$'s and $3$'s and enough other zeroes to fill the spaces in the sequence subject to our constraints.



                Similarly there are $2times 4, 1times 5$ and $6$ ways in the other cases respectively. The only one of our cases which doesn't follow this pattern is the case for $3+3$ which instead has $binom{3}{2}=3$ options for how to distribute the $0$'s instead.



                This gives a grand total of:



                $$1times 2times 3 + 2times 4 + 3 + 1times 5 + 6 = 6+8+3+5+6=28$$






                share|cite|improve this answer












                Your function is effectively a generating function for the number of ways you can express a number as a sequence where the sum of the terms in the sequence is equal to our number and within the first $1$ terms all terms are either $0$ or $1$, within the next $2$ terms all terms are either $0$ or $2$, within the next $3$ terms all terms are either $0$ or $3$, etc... on up to the final $n$ terms where all terms are either $0$ or $n$.



                $underbrace{underline{~}}_{1's}underbrace{underline{~}~underline{~}}_{2's}underbrace{underline{~}~underline{~}~underline{~}}_{3's}cdots underbrace{underline{~}~underline{~}~underline{~}~underline{~}~underline{~}~underline{~}}_{6's}$



                One such sequence might be $underbrace{underline{0}}_{1's}underbrace{underline{0}~underline{0}}_{2's}underbrace{underline{3}~underline{0}~underline{3}}_{3's}cdots underbrace{underline{0}~underline{0}~underline{0}~underline{0}~underline{0}~underline{0}}_{6's}$



                I would break down into cases based on the different ways that you can reach a total of $6$ using at most one $1$'s, at most two $2$'s, at most three $3$'s, etc..., where the terms appear in (non-strictly) increasing order, noting that we may stop at $6$ since if we continue past $6$ the sum would be larger than $6$ if we use any of those terms anyways.



                The ways you can do this are $1+2+3$, $2+4$, $3+3$, $1+5$, $6$. You can check there are no other ways subject to our constraints.



                Now, for each of these, let us figure out the number of ways to select which of the positions in our sequence receive the number in question and which receive the zeroes. For example in the case of $1+2+3$, there is one way to choose where to place the $1$. There are $2$ ways to choose how to place the $2$, and there are $3$ ways to choose how to place the $3$. This gives $1times 2times 3$ ways to have gotten a sum of $6$ using $1$'s, $2$'s and $3$'s and enough other zeroes to fill the spaces in the sequence subject to our constraints.



                Similarly there are $2times 4, 1times 5$ and $6$ ways in the other cases respectively. The only one of our cases which doesn't follow this pattern is the case for $3+3$ which instead has $binom{3}{2}=3$ options for how to distribute the $0$'s instead.



                This gives a grand total of:



                $$1times 2times 3 + 2times 4 + 3 + 1times 5 + 6 = 6+8+3+5+6=28$$







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Nov 22 at 18:52









                JMoravitz

                46.2k33784




                46.2k33784












                • Actually I am 10 std student so is there a simpler method
                  – Noone Noone
                  Nov 22 at 19:02










                • If by "simpler" you mean "simpler" in terms of theory, yes, you can just expand your product fully... That seems like a terrible idea and waste of time to me though. You can save a bit more time by totally ignoring every term in the expansion and partial expansions where the exponent is larger than $6$ already. Even with that simplification though, this seems incredibly tedious and prone to error.
                  – JMoravitz
                  Nov 22 at 19:23












                • In terms of simplest in terms of arithmetic, I doubt it gets any easier than what I did above.
                  – JMoravitz
                  Nov 22 at 19:23


















                • Actually I am 10 std student so is there a simpler method
                  – Noone Noone
                  Nov 22 at 19:02










                • If by "simpler" you mean "simpler" in terms of theory, yes, you can just expand your product fully... That seems like a terrible idea and waste of time to me though. You can save a bit more time by totally ignoring every term in the expansion and partial expansions where the exponent is larger than $6$ already. Even with that simplification though, this seems incredibly tedious and prone to error.
                  – JMoravitz
                  Nov 22 at 19:23












                • In terms of simplest in terms of arithmetic, I doubt it gets any easier than what I did above.
                  – JMoravitz
                  Nov 22 at 19:23
















                Actually I am 10 std student so is there a simpler method
                – Noone Noone
                Nov 22 at 19:02




                Actually I am 10 std student so is there a simpler method
                – Noone Noone
                Nov 22 at 19:02












                If by "simpler" you mean "simpler" in terms of theory, yes, you can just expand your product fully... That seems like a terrible idea and waste of time to me though. You can save a bit more time by totally ignoring every term in the expansion and partial expansions where the exponent is larger than $6$ already. Even with that simplification though, this seems incredibly tedious and prone to error.
                – JMoravitz
                Nov 22 at 19:23






                If by "simpler" you mean "simpler" in terms of theory, yes, you can just expand your product fully... That seems like a terrible idea and waste of time to me though. You can save a bit more time by totally ignoring every term in the expansion and partial expansions where the exponent is larger than $6$ already. Even with that simplification though, this seems incredibly tedious and prone to error.
                – JMoravitz
                Nov 22 at 19:23














                In terms of simplest in terms of arithmetic, I doubt it gets any easier than what I did above.
                – JMoravitz
                Nov 22 at 19:23




                In terms of simplest in terms of arithmetic, I doubt it gets any easier than what I did above.
                – JMoravitz
                Nov 22 at 19:23










                up vote
                1
                down vote













                Notet that the coefficient of $x^6$ is
                begin{align}
                sumprod_{k=1}^nbinom k{t_k}
                end{align}

                where the sum is taken over $0leq t_kleq k$ such that $sum_{k=1}^nkt_k=6$.
                Note that $t_k=0$ for $k>6$.
                The only possible sums $sum_{k=1}^6kt_k=6$ are:
                begin{align}
                6=1cdot 0+2cdot 0+3cdot 0+4cdot 0+5cdot 0+6cdot 1\
                6=1cdot 1+2cdot 0+3cdot 0+4cdot 0+5cdot 1+6cdot 0\
                6=1cdot 0+2cdot 1+3cdot 0+4cdot 1+5cdot 0+6cdot 0\
                6=1cdot 0+2cdot 0+3cdot 2+4cdot 0+5cdot 0+6cdot 0\
                6=1cdot 1+2cdot 1+3cdot 1+4cdot 0+5cdot 0+6cdot 0
                end{align}

                consequently, the required coefficient is
                begin{align}
                c
                &=binom 10binom 20binom 30binom 40binom 50binom 61\
                &+binom 11binom 20binom 30binom 40binom 51binom 60\
                &+binom 10binom 21binom 30binom 41binom 50binom 60\
                &+binom 10binom 20binom 32binom 40binom 50binom 60\
                &+binom 11binom 21binom 31binom 40binom 50binom 60\
                &=6+5+8+3+6\
                &=28
                end{align}






                share|cite|improve this answer

























                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote













                  Notet that the coefficient of $x^6$ is
                  begin{align}
                  sumprod_{k=1}^nbinom k{t_k}
                  end{align}

                  where the sum is taken over $0leq t_kleq k$ such that $sum_{k=1}^nkt_k=6$.
                  Note that $t_k=0$ for $k>6$.
                  The only possible sums $sum_{k=1}^6kt_k=6$ are:
                  begin{align}
                  6=1cdot 0+2cdot 0+3cdot 0+4cdot 0+5cdot 0+6cdot 1\
                  6=1cdot 1+2cdot 0+3cdot 0+4cdot 0+5cdot 1+6cdot 0\
                  6=1cdot 0+2cdot 1+3cdot 0+4cdot 1+5cdot 0+6cdot 0\
                  6=1cdot 0+2cdot 0+3cdot 2+4cdot 0+5cdot 0+6cdot 0\
                  6=1cdot 1+2cdot 1+3cdot 1+4cdot 0+5cdot 0+6cdot 0
                  end{align}

                  consequently, the required coefficient is
                  begin{align}
                  c
                  &=binom 10binom 20binom 30binom 40binom 50binom 61\
                  &+binom 11binom 20binom 30binom 40binom 51binom 60\
                  &+binom 10binom 21binom 30binom 41binom 50binom 60\
                  &+binom 10binom 20binom 32binom 40binom 50binom 60\
                  &+binom 11binom 21binom 31binom 40binom 50binom 60\
                  &=6+5+8+3+6\
                  &=28
                  end{align}






                  share|cite|improve this answer























                    up vote
                    1
                    down vote










                    up vote
                    1
                    down vote









                    Notet that the coefficient of $x^6$ is
                    begin{align}
                    sumprod_{k=1}^nbinom k{t_k}
                    end{align}

                    where the sum is taken over $0leq t_kleq k$ such that $sum_{k=1}^nkt_k=6$.
                    Note that $t_k=0$ for $k>6$.
                    The only possible sums $sum_{k=1}^6kt_k=6$ are:
                    begin{align}
                    6=1cdot 0+2cdot 0+3cdot 0+4cdot 0+5cdot 0+6cdot 1\
                    6=1cdot 1+2cdot 0+3cdot 0+4cdot 0+5cdot 1+6cdot 0\
                    6=1cdot 0+2cdot 1+3cdot 0+4cdot 1+5cdot 0+6cdot 0\
                    6=1cdot 0+2cdot 0+3cdot 2+4cdot 0+5cdot 0+6cdot 0\
                    6=1cdot 1+2cdot 1+3cdot 1+4cdot 0+5cdot 0+6cdot 0
                    end{align}

                    consequently, the required coefficient is
                    begin{align}
                    c
                    &=binom 10binom 20binom 30binom 40binom 50binom 61\
                    &+binom 11binom 20binom 30binom 40binom 51binom 60\
                    &+binom 10binom 21binom 30binom 41binom 50binom 60\
                    &+binom 10binom 20binom 32binom 40binom 50binom 60\
                    &+binom 11binom 21binom 31binom 40binom 50binom 60\
                    &=6+5+8+3+6\
                    &=28
                    end{align}






                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    Notet that the coefficient of $x^6$ is
                    begin{align}
                    sumprod_{k=1}^nbinom k{t_k}
                    end{align}

                    where the sum is taken over $0leq t_kleq k$ such that $sum_{k=1}^nkt_k=6$.
                    Note that $t_k=0$ for $k>6$.
                    The only possible sums $sum_{k=1}^6kt_k=6$ are:
                    begin{align}
                    6=1cdot 0+2cdot 0+3cdot 0+4cdot 0+5cdot 0+6cdot 1\
                    6=1cdot 1+2cdot 0+3cdot 0+4cdot 0+5cdot 1+6cdot 0\
                    6=1cdot 0+2cdot 1+3cdot 0+4cdot 1+5cdot 0+6cdot 0\
                    6=1cdot 0+2cdot 0+3cdot 2+4cdot 0+5cdot 0+6cdot 0\
                    6=1cdot 1+2cdot 1+3cdot 1+4cdot 0+5cdot 0+6cdot 0
                    end{align}

                    consequently, the required coefficient is
                    begin{align}
                    c
                    &=binom 10binom 20binom 30binom 40binom 50binom 61\
                    &+binom 11binom 20binom 30binom 40binom 51binom 60\
                    &+binom 10binom 21binom 30binom 41binom 50binom 60\
                    &+binom 10binom 20binom 32binom 40binom 50binom 60\
                    &+binom 11binom 21binom 31binom 40binom 50binom 60\
                    &=6+5+8+3+6\
                    &=28
                    end{align}







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered Nov 23 at 10:08









                    Fabio Lucchini

                    7,82311326




                    7,82311326






















                        up vote
                        1
                        down vote













                        Here is my attempt at pitching the answer as simply as possible. Hope it's easy to understand.



                        If you want a systematic way of multiplying those then remember that the $k^{text{th}}$ row of Pascal's triangle gives $a_{k,r}$, the coefficients of $x^r$ in the expansion of $(1+x)^k$:



                        $$begin{array}{c|cccccccc}
                        kbackslash r& x^0 & x^1 & x^2& x^3& x^4& x^5& x^6\hline
                        0 & 1 &&&&&&\
                        1 & 1 & 1 &&&&&\
                        2 & 1 & 2 & 1 &&&&\
                        3 & 1 & 3 & 3 & 1 &&&\
                        4 & 1 & 4 & 6 & 4 & 1 &&\
                        5 & 1 & 5 & 10 & 10 & 5 & 1 &\
                        6 & 1 & 6 & 15 & 20 & 15 & 6 & 1end{array}$$



                        Remember also that each coefficient in row $k$ column $x^r$ is found by adding the coefficients in the previous row (row $k-1$) in columns $x^r$ and $x^{r-1}$. We represent this with the recurrence



                        $$a_{k,r}=a_{k-1,r}+a_{k-1,r-1}$$



                        Each row $k$ represents the expansion of $(1+x)times (1+x)^{k-1}$.



                        In a similar way we can expand your product



                        $$(1+x)(1+x^2)^2(1+x^3)^3cdots (1+x^k)^k$$



                        by creating a table of coefficients $b_{k,r}$ in which each row $k$ represents the resulting $x^r$ coefficients $(1+x^k)^k$ multiplied by the polynomial of the previous row.



                        Our recurrence is now



                        $$b_{k,r}=a_{k,0}b_{k-1,r}+a_{k,1}b_{k-1,r-k}+a_{k,2}b_{k-1,r-2k}+a_{k,3}b_{k-1,r-3k}+cdots$$



                        We can produce a table much like with Pascal's recurrence, viz:



                        $$begin{array}{c|cccccccc}
                        kbackslash r& x^0 & x^1 & x^2& x^3& x^4& x^5& x^6\hline
                        0 & 1 &&&&&&\
                        1 & 1 & 1 &&&&&\
                        2 & 1 & 1 & 2 & 2 & 1 & 1 &\
                        3 & 1 & 1 & 2 & 5 & 4 & 7 & 9\
                        4 & 1 & 1 & 2 & 5 & 8 & 11 & 17\
                        5 & 1 & 1 & 2 & 5 & 8 & 16 & 22\
                        6 & 1 & 1 & 2 & 5 & 8 & 16 & 28end{array}$$



                        Here the recurrence gives each successive row by multiplying the previous row coefficients by the relevant $a_{k,r}$ values and adding the result.



                        Since we only want $x^6$ there is no need to expand past row $6$ column $6$. We find that calculation gets easier with each successive row due to the recurrence ignoring $b_{k-1,r-s}$ terms where $s$ is not a multiple of $k$.



                        So our answer is, for all $k$



                        begin{array}{c|c}k & b_{k,6}\hline
                        0 & 0\
                        1 &0\
                        2 & 0\
                        3 &9\
                        4 &17\
                        5 &22\
                        6 &28\
                        7 &28\
                        vdots &vdots\end{array}



                        clearly the answer stays at $28$ for all $kge 6$.



                        Note: I've used $k$ instead of $n$.






                        share|cite|improve this answer

























                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote













                          Here is my attempt at pitching the answer as simply as possible. Hope it's easy to understand.



                          If you want a systematic way of multiplying those then remember that the $k^{text{th}}$ row of Pascal's triangle gives $a_{k,r}$, the coefficients of $x^r$ in the expansion of $(1+x)^k$:



                          $$begin{array}{c|cccccccc}
                          kbackslash r& x^0 & x^1 & x^2& x^3& x^4& x^5& x^6\hline
                          0 & 1 &&&&&&\
                          1 & 1 & 1 &&&&&\
                          2 & 1 & 2 & 1 &&&&\
                          3 & 1 & 3 & 3 & 1 &&&\
                          4 & 1 & 4 & 6 & 4 & 1 &&\
                          5 & 1 & 5 & 10 & 10 & 5 & 1 &\
                          6 & 1 & 6 & 15 & 20 & 15 & 6 & 1end{array}$$



                          Remember also that each coefficient in row $k$ column $x^r$ is found by adding the coefficients in the previous row (row $k-1$) in columns $x^r$ and $x^{r-1}$. We represent this with the recurrence



                          $$a_{k,r}=a_{k-1,r}+a_{k-1,r-1}$$



                          Each row $k$ represents the expansion of $(1+x)times (1+x)^{k-1}$.



                          In a similar way we can expand your product



                          $$(1+x)(1+x^2)^2(1+x^3)^3cdots (1+x^k)^k$$



                          by creating a table of coefficients $b_{k,r}$ in which each row $k$ represents the resulting $x^r$ coefficients $(1+x^k)^k$ multiplied by the polynomial of the previous row.



                          Our recurrence is now



                          $$b_{k,r}=a_{k,0}b_{k-1,r}+a_{k,1}b_{k-1,r-k}+a_{k,2}b_{k-1,r-2k}+a_{k,3}b_{k-1,r-3k}+cdots$$



                          We can produce a table much like with Pascal's recurrence, viz:



                          $$begin{array}{c|cccccccc}
                          kbackslash r& x^0 & x^1 & x^2& x^3& x^4& x^5& x^6\hline
                          0 & 1 &&&&&&\
                          1 & 1 & 1 &&&&&\
                          2 & 1 & 1 & 2 & 2 & 1 & 1 &\
                          3 & 1 & 1 & 2 & 5 & 4 & 7 & 9\
                          4 & 1 & 1 & 2 & 5 & 8 & 11 & 17\
                          5 & 1 & 1 & 2 & 5 & 8 & 16 & 22\
                          6 & 1 & 1 & 2 & 5 & 8 & 16 & 28end{array}$$



                          Here the recurrence gives each successive row by multiplying the previous row coefficients by the relevant $a_{k,r}$ values and adding the result.



                          Since we only want $x^6$ there is no need to expand past row $6$ column $6$. We find that calculation gets easier with each successive row due to the recurrence ignoring $b_{k-1,r-s}$ terms where $s$ is not a multiple of $k$.



                          So our answer is, for all $k$



                          begin{array}{c|c}k & b_{k,6}\hline
                          0 & 0\
                          1 &0\
                          2 & 0\
                          3 &9\
                          4 &17\
                          5 &22\
                          6 &28\
                          7 &28\
                          vdots &vdots\end{array}



                          clearly the answer stays at $28$ for all $kge 6$.



                          Note: I've used $k$ instead of $n$.






                          share|cite|improve this answer























                            up vote
                            1
                            down vote










                            up vote
                            1
                            down vote









                            Here is my attempt at pitching the answer as simply as possible. Hope it's easy to understand.



                            If you want a systematic way of multiplying those then remember that the $k^{text{th}}$ row of Pascal's triangle gives $a_{k,r}$, the coefficients of $x^r$ in the expansion of $(1+x)^k$:



                            $$begin{array}{c|cccccccc}
                            kbackslash r& x^0 & x^1 & x^2& x^3& x^4& x^5& x^6\hline
                            0 & 1 &&&&&&\
                            1 & 1 & 1 &&&&&\
                            2 & 1 & 2 & 1 &&&&\
                            3 & 1 & 3 & 3 & 1 &&&\
                            4 & 1 & 4 & 6 & 4 & 1 &&\
                            5 & 1 & 5 & 10 & 10 & 5 & 1 &\
                            6 & 1 & 6 & 15 & 20 & 15 & 6 & 1end{array}$$



                            Remember also that each coefficient in row $k$ column $x^r$ is found by adding the coefficients in the previous row (row $k-1$) in columns $x^r$ and $x^{r-1}$. We represent this with the recurrence



                            $$a_{k,r}=a_{k-1,r}+a_{k-1,r-1}$$



                            Each row $k$ represents the expansion of $(1+x)times (1+x)^{k-1}$.



                            In a similar way we can expand your product



                            $$(1+x)(1+x^2)^2(1+x^3)^3cdots (1+x^k)^k$$



                            by creating a table of coefficients $b_{k,r}$ in which each row $k$ represents the resulting $x^r$ coefficients $(1+x^k)^k$ multiplied by the polynomial of the previous row.



                            Our recurrence is now



                            $$b_{k,r}=a_{k,0}b_{k-1,r}+a_{k,1}b_{k-1,r-k}+a_{k,2}b_{k-1,r-2k}+a_{k,3}b_{k-1,r-3k}+cdots$$



                            We can produce a table much like with Pascal's recurrence, viz:



                            $$begin{array}{c|cccccccc}
                            kbackslash r& x^0 & x^1 & x^2& x^3& x^4& x^5& x^6\hline
                            0 & 1 &&&&&&\
                            1 & 1 & 1 &&&&&\
                            2 & 1 & 1 & 2 & 2 & 1 & 1 &\
                            3 & 1 & 1 & 2 & 5 & 4 & 7 & 9\
                            4 & 1 & 1 & 2 & 5 & 8 & 11 & 17\
                            5 & 1 & 1 & 2 & 5 & 8 & 16 & 22\
                            6 & 1 & 1 & 2 & 5 & 8 & 16 & 28end{array}$$



                            Here the recurrence gives each successive row by multiplying the previous row coefficients by the relevant $a_{k,r}$ values and adding the result.



                            Since we only want $x^6$ there is no need to expand past row $6$ column $6$. We find that calculation gets easier with each successive row due to the recurrence ignoring $b_{k-1,r-s}$ terms where $s$ is not a multiple of $k$.



                            So our answer is, for all $k$



                            begin{array}{c|c}k & b_{k,6}\hline
                            0 & 0\
                            1 &0\
                            2 & 0\
                            3 &9\
                            4 &17\
                            5 &22\
                            6 &28\
                            7 &28\
                            vdots &vdots\end{array}



                            clearly the answer stays at $28$ for all $kge 6$.



                            Note: I've used $k$ instead of $n$.






                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            Here is my attempt at pitching the answer as simply as possible. Hope it's easy to understand.



                            If you want a systematic way of multiplying those then remember that the $k^{text{th}}$ row of Pascal's triangle gives $a_{k,r}$, the coefficients of $x^r$ in the expansion of $(1+x)^k$:



                            $$begin{array}{c|cccccccc}
                            kbackslash r& x^0 & x^1 & x^2& x^3& x^4& x^5& x^6\hline
                            0 & 1 &&&&&&\
                            1 & 1 & 1 &&&&&\
                            2 & 1 & 2 & 1 &&&&\
                            3 & 1 & 3 & 3 & 1 &&&\
                            4 & 1 & 4 & 6 & 4 & 1 &&\
                            5 & 1 & 5 & 10 & 10 & 5 & 1 &\
                            6 & 1 & 6 & 15 & 20 & 15 & 6 & 1end{array}$$



                            Remember also that each coefficient in row $k$ column $x^r$ is found by adding the coefficients in the previous row (row $k-1$) in columns $x^r$ and $x^{r-1}$. We represent this with the recurrence



                            $$a_{k,r}=a_{k-1,r}+a_{k-1,r-1}$$



                            Each row $k$ represents the expansion of $(1+x)times (1+x)^{k-1}$.



                            In a similar way we can expand your product



                            $$(1+x)(1+x^2)^2(1+x^3)^3cdots (1+x^k)^k$$



                            by creating a table of coefficients $b_{k,r}$ in which each row $k$ represents the resulting $x^r$ coefficients $(1+x^k)^k$ multiplied by the polynomial of the previous row.



                            Our recurrence is now



                            $$b_{k,r}=a_{k,0}b_{k-1,r}+a_{k,1}b_{k-1,r-k}+a_{k,2}b_{k-1,r-2k}+a_{k,3}b_{k-1,r-3k}+cdots$$



                            We can produce a table much like with Pascal's recurrence, viz:



                            $$begin{array}{c|cccccccc}
                            kbackslash r& x^0 & x^1 & x^2& x^3& x^4& x^5& x^6\hline
                            0 & 1 &&&&&&\
                            1 & 1 & 1 &&&&&\
                            2 & 1 & 1 & 2 & 2 & 1 & 1 &\
                            3 & 1 & 1 & 2 & 5 & 4 & 7 & 9\
                            4 & 1 & 1 & 2 & 5 & 8 & 11 & 17\
                            5 & 1 & 1 & 2 & 5 & 8 & 16 & 22\
                            6 & 1 & 1 & 2 & 5 & 8 & 16 & 28end{array}$$



                            Here the recurrence gives each successive row by multiplying the previous row coefficients by the relevant $a_{k,r}$ values and adding the result.



                            Since we only want $x^6$ there is no need to expand past row $6$ column $6$. We find that calculation gets easier with each successive row due to the recurrence ignoring $b_{k-1,r-s}$ terms where $s$ is not a multiple of $k$.



                            So our answer is, for all $k$



                            begin{array}{c|c}k & b_{k,6}\hline
                            0 & 0\
                            1 &0\
                            2 & 0\
                            3 &9\
                            4 &17\
                            5 &22\
                            6 &28\
                            7 &28\
                            vdots &vdots\end{array}



                            clearly the answer stays at $28$ for all $kge 6$.



                            Note: I've used $k$ instead of $n$.







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered Nov 23 at 17:28









                            N. Shales

                            3,2431816




                            3,2431816






























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded




















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                                Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                                Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3009479%2fi-tried-this-question-by-using-pi-denoting-method-and-got-a-big-equation-what-to%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Quarter-circle Tiles

                                build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

                                Mont Emei