We have a linear operator T. Show $T^2=Id$ implies $T=T^*$
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
We have a linear operator $T:Vrightarrow V $. V is a finite-dimension inner product space over the field of the complex numbers. Show $T^2=Id$ implies $T=T^*$.
I've tried working with the inner product, trying to get $(Tx,x)=(x,Tx)$ with no luck. Maybe it has something to do with a basis for T (and thus diagonalizability?)
linear-algebra self-adjoint-operators
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
We have a linear operator $T:Vrightarrow V $. V is a finite-dimension inner product space over the field of the complex numbers. Show $T^2=Id$ implies $T=T^*$.
I've tried working with the inner product, trying to get $(Tx,x)=(x,Tx)$ with no luck. Maybe it has something to do with a basis for T (and thus diagonalizability?)
linear-algebra self-adjoint-operators
New contributor
1
Suppose $T^2=I$ and $T=T^*$; then $TT^*=I$, so $T$ is unitary and Hermitian. Can you find a nonsymmetric real $2times2$ matrix having trace $0$ and determinant $-1$? Easy one: $begin{bmatrix}0&2\1/2&0end{bmatrix}$; less easy: $begin{bmatrix}2&-3\1&-2end{bmatrix}$.
– egreg
5 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
We have a linear operator $T:Vrightarrow V $. V is a finite-dimension inner product space over the field of the complex numbers. Show $T^2=Id$ implies $T=T^*$.
I've tried working with the inner product, trying to get $(Tx,x)=(x,Tx)$ with no luck. Maybe it has something to do with a basis for T (and thus diagonalizability?)
linear-algebra self-adjoint-operators
New contributor
We have a linear operator $T:Vrightarrow V $. V is a finite-dimension inner product space over the field of the complex numbers. Show $T^2=Id$ implies $T=T^*$.
I've tried working with the inner product, trying to get $(Tx,x)=(x,Tx)$ with no luck. Maybe it has something to do with a basis for T (and thus diagonalizability?)
linear-algebra self-adjoint-operators
linear-algebra self-adjoint-operators
New contributor
New contributor
edited 15 mins ago
John Doe
9,68811134
9,68811134
New contributor
asked 5 hours ago
matt
62
62
New contributor
New contributor
1
Suppose $T^2=I$ and $T=T^*$; then $TT^*=I$, so $T$ is unitary and Hermitian. Can you find a nonsymmetric real $2times2$ matrix having trace $0$ and determinant $-1$? Easy one: $begin{bmatrix}0&2\1/2&0end{bmatrix}$; less easy: $begin{bmatrix}2&-3\1&-2end{bmatrix}$.
– egreg
5 hours ago
add a comment |
1
Suppose $T^2=I$ and $T=T^*$; then $TT^*=I$, so $T$ is unitary and Hermitian. Can you find a nonsymmetric real $2times2$ matrix having trace $0$ and determinant $-1$? Easy one: $begin{bmatrix}0&2\1/2&0end{bmatrix}$; less easy: $begin{bmatrix}2&-3\1&-2end{bmatrix}$.
– egreg
5 hours ago
1
1
Suppose $T^2=I$ and $T=T^*$; then $TT^*=I$, so $T$ is unitary and Hermitian. Can you find a nonsymmetric real $2times2$ matrix having trace $0$ and determinant $-1$? Easy one: $begin{bmatrix}0&2\1/2&0end{bmatrix}$; less easy: $begin{bmatrix}2&-3\1&-2end{bmatrix}$.
– egreg
5 hours ago
Suppose $T^2=I$ and $T=T^*$; then $TT^*=I$, so $T$ is unitary and Hermitian. Can you find a nonsymmetric real $2times2$ matrix having trace $0$ and determinant $-1$? Easy one: $begin{bmatrix}0&2\1/2&0end{bmatrix}$; less easy: $begin{bmatrix}2&-3\1&-2end{bmatrix}$.
– egreg
5 hours ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
You can't prove it, since it is not true. Take$$begin{array}{rccc}Tcolon&mathbb{R}^2&longrightarrow&mathbb{R}\&(x,y)&mapsto&left(2y,frac x2right).end{array}$$Then $T^2=operatorname{Id}$, but $T^*(x,y)=left(frac y2,2xright)$.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
$(Tx, y)=(Tx, T^2 y)=(T x, T (Ty))=(x,T y)$
if $T$ is an isometric operator
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
I will build a basis on which $T$ is diagonal.
Given a non-zero vector $u$, consider $v=Tu$. We then have $Tu=v$. Let the first two vectors in our basis be $u+v,u-v$. These are eigenvectors of $T$ with eigenvalues $pm1$ (if either of those two vectors is $0$, then don't include that in the basis).
Repeat the process by picking a $w$ not in the span of $u,v$, look at $Tw$, add $wpm Tw$ to the basis, and so on.
We get a basis of eigenvectors with real eigenvalues, meaning $T$ is diagonalizable.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
matt is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3043246%2fwe-have-a-linear-operator-t-show-t2-id-implies-t-t%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
You can't prove it, since it is not true. Take$$begin{array}{rccc}Tcolon&mathbb{R}^2&longrightarrow&mathbb{R}\&(x,y)&mapsto&left(2y,frac x2right).end{array}$$Then $T^2=operatorname{Id}$, but $T^*(x,y)=left(frac y2,2xright)$.
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
You can't prove it, since it is not true. Take$$begin{array}{rccc}Tcolon&mathbb{R}^2&longrightarrow&mathbb{R}\&(x,y)&mapsto&left(2y,frac x2right).end{array}$$Then $T^2=operatorname{Id}$, but $T^*(x,y)=left(frac y2,2xright)$.
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
up vote
4
down vote
You can't prove it, since it is not true. Take$$begin{array}{rccc}Tcolon&mathbb{R}^2&longrightarrow&mathbb{R}\&(x,y)&mapsto&left(2y,frac x2right).end{array}$$Then $T^2=operatorname{Id}$, but $T^*(x,y)=left(frac y2,2xright)$.
You can't prove it, since it is not true. Take$$begin{array}{rccc}Tcolon&mathbb{R}^2&longrightarrow&mathbb{R}\&(x,y)&mapsto&left(2y,frac x2right).end{array}$$Then $T^2=operatorname{Id}$, but $T^*(x,y)=left(frac y2,2xright)$.
answered 5 hours ago
José Carlos Santos
147k22117217
147k22117217
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
$(Tx, y)=(Tx, T^2 y)=(T x, T (Ty))=(x,T y)$
if $T$ is an isometric operator
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
$(Tx, y)=(Tx, T^2 y)=(T x, T (Ty))=(x,T y)$
if $T$ is an isometric operator
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
$(Tx, y)=(Tx, T^2 y)=(T x, T (Ty))=(x,T y)$
if $T$ is an isometric operator
$(Tx, y)=(Tx, T^2 y)=(T x, T (Ty))=(x,T y)$
if $T$ is an isometric operator
answered 5 hours ago
Federico Fallucca
1,76318
1,76318
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
I will build a basis on which $T$ is diagonal.
Given a non-zero vector $u$, consider $v=Tu$. We then have $Tu=v$. Let the first two vectors in our basis be $u+v,u-v$. These are eigenvectors of $T$ with eigenvalues $pm1$ (if either of those two vectors is $0$, then don't include that in the basis).
Repeat the process by picking a $w$ not in the span of $u,v$, look at $Tw$, add $wpm Tw$ to the basis, and so on.
We get a basis of eigenvectors with real eigenvalues, meaning $T$ is diagonalizable.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
I will build a basis on which $T$ is diagonal.
Given a non-zero vector $u$, consider $v=Tu$. We then have $Tu=v$. Let the first two vectors in our basis be $u+v,u-v$. These are eigenvectors of $T$ with eigenvalues $pm1$ (if either of those two vectors is $0$, then don't include that in the basis).
Repeat the process by picking a $w$ not in the span of $u,v$, look at $Tw$, add $wpm Tw$ to the basis, and so on.
We get a basis of eigenvectors with real eigenvalues, meaning $T$ is diagonalizable.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
I will build a basis on which $T$ is diagonal.
Given a non-zero vector $u$, consider $v=Tu$. We then have $Tu=v$. Let the first two vectors in our basis be $u+v,u-v$. These are eigenvectors of $T$ with eigenvalues $pm1$ (if either of those two vectors is $0$, then don't include that in the basis).
Repeat the process by picking a $w$ not in the span of $u,v$, look at $Tw$, add $wpm Tw$ to the basis, and so on.
We get a basis of eigenvectors with real eigenvalues, meaning $T$ is diagonalizable.
I will build a basis on which $T$ is diagonal.
Given a non-zero vector $u$, consider $v=Tu$. We then have $Tu=v$. Let the first two vectors in our basis be $u+v,u-v$. These are eigenvectors of $T$ with eigenvalues $pm1$ (if either of those two vectors is $0$, then don't include that in the basis).
Repeat the process by picking a $w$ not in the span of $u,v$, look at $Tw$, add $wpm Tw$ to the basis, and so on.
We get a basis of eigenvectors with real eigenvalues, meaning $T$ is diagonalizable.
edited 5 hours ago
answered 5 hours ago
Arthur
110k7104186
110k7104186
add a comment |
add a comment |
matt is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
matt is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
matt is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
matt is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3043246%2fwe-have-a-linear-operator-t-show-t2-id-implies-t-t%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Suppose $T^2=I$ and $T=T^*$; then $TT^*=I$, so $T$ is unitary and Hermitian. Can you find a nonsymmetric real $2times2$ matrix having trace $0$ and determinant $-1$? Easy one: $begin{bmatrix}0&2\1/2&0end{bmatrix}$; less easy: $begin{bmatrix}2&-3\1&-2end{bmatrix}$.
– egreg
5 hours ago