Lebesgue space inclusion on half real line











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Assume that $f in L^1 ([0,infty))$ is a real continuous function on $[0,infty)$.



Can we then conclude that $f in L^p ([0,infty))$ for $p in [1, infty)$?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • I guess $f(x) = 1$ is a real continuous function on $[0,infty)$. Is it in $L^p$?
    – GEdgar
    Nov 22 at 16:45















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Assume that $f in L^1 ([0,infty))$ is a real continuous function on $[0,infty)$.



Can we then conclude that $f in L^p ([0,infty))$ for $p in [1, infty)$?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • I guess $f(x) = 1$ is a real continuous function on $[0,infty)$. Is it in $L^p$?
    – GEdgar
    Nov 22 at 16:45













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











Assume that $f in L^1 ([0,infty))$ is a real continuous function on $[0,infty)$.



Can we then conclude that $f in L^p ([0,infty))$ for $p in [1, infty)$?










share|cite|improve this question













Assume that $f in L^1 ([0,infty))$ is a real continuous function on $[0,infty)$.



Can we then conclude that $f in L^p ([0,infty))$ for $p in [1, infty)$?







real-analysis integration lebesgue-integral lebesgue-measure






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 22 at 16:36









sleepingrabbit

1317




1317












  • I guess $f(x) = 1$ is a real continuous function on $[0,infty)$. Is it in $L^p$?
    – GEdgar
    Nov 22 at 16:45


















  • I guess $f(x) = 1$ is a real continuous function on $[0,infty)$. Is it in $L^p$?
    – GEdgar
    Nov 22 at 16:45
















I guess $f(x) = 1$ is a real continuous function on $[0,infty)$. Is it in $L^p$?
– GEdgar
Nov 22 at 16:45




I guess $f(x) = 1$ is a real continuous function on $[0,infty)$. Is it in $L^p$?
– GEdgar
Nov 22 at 16:45










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote



accepted










This is false. To build a counterexample, consider functions $g_n(x)$ that is non-zero only on $(n, n + 2n^{-3})$, piecewise linear, with $g_n(n) = g_n(n+2n^{-3}) = 0$ and $g_n(n+n^{-3}) = n$. Then,
$$
int g_n(x) dx = frac12 n cdot 2n^{-3} = n^{-2}.
$$

Since for $n geq 2$ functions $g_n$ have disjoint support, if we define $f = sum_{n geq 2} g_n$ then $f in L^1([0, infty))$. However, if we take $p = 2$, we have that
$$
int g_n(x)^2 dx geq int_{n + frac12 n^{-3}}^{n + frac32 n^{-3}} (frac12 n)^2 dx = frac14 n^{-1}.
$$

This implies $int f^2 geq frac14 sum_{n geq 2} n^{-1} = infty$.






share|cite|improve this answer























    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3009330%2flebesgue-space-inclusion-on-half-real-line%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    2
    down vote



    accepted










    This is false. To build a counterexample, consider functions $g_n(x)$ that is non-zero only on $(n, n + 2n^{-3})$, piecewise linear, with $g_n(n) = g_n(n+2n^{-3}) = 0$ and $g_n(n+n^{-3}) = n$. Then,
    $$
    int g_n(x) dx = frac12 n cdot 2n^{-3} = n^{-2}.
    $$

    Since for $n geq 2$ functions $g_n$ have disjoint support, if we define $f = sum_{n geq 2} g_n$ then $f in L^1([0, infty))$. However, if we take $p = 2$, we have that
    $$
    int g_n(x)^2 dx geq int_{n + frac12 n^{-3}}^{n + frac32 n^{-3}} (frac12 n)^2 dx = frac14 n^{-1}.
    $$

    This implies $int f^2 geq frac14 sum_{n geq 2} n^{-1} = infty$.






    share|cite|improve this answer



























      up vote
      2
      down vote



      accepted










      This is false. To build a counterexample, consider functions $g_n(x)$ that is non-zero only on $(n, n + 2n^{-3})$, piecewise linear, with $g_n(n) = g_n(n+2n^{-3}) = 0$ and $g_n(n+n^{-3}) = n$. Then,
      $$
      int g_n(x) dx = frac12 n cdot 2n^{-3} = n^{-2}.
      $$

      Since for $n geq 2$ functions $g_n$ have disjoint support, if we define $f = sum_{n geq 2} g_n$ then $f in L^1([0, infty))$. However, if we take $p = 2$, we have that
      $$
      int g_n(x)^2 dx geq int_{n + frac12 n^{-3}}^{n + frac32 n^{-3}} (frac12 n)^2 dx = frac14 n^{-1}.
      $$

      This implies $int f^2 geq frac14 sum_{n geq 2} n^{-1} = infty$.






      share|cite|improve this answer

























        up vote
        2
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        2
        down vote



        accepted






        This is false. To build a counterexample, consider functions $g_n(x)$ that is non-zero only on $(n, n + 2n^{-3})$, piecewise linear, with $g_n(n) = g_n(n+2n^{-3}) = 0$ and $g_n(n+n^{-3}) = n$. Then,
        $$
        int g_n(x) dx = frac12 n cdot 2n^{-3} = n^{-2}.
        $$

        Since for $n geq 2$ functions $g_n$ have disjoint support, if we define $f = sum_{n geq 2} g_n$ then $f in L^1([0, infty))$. However, if we take $p = 2$, we have that
        $$
        int g_n(x)^2 dx geq int_{n + frac12 n^{-3}}^{n + frac32 n^{-3}} (frac12 n)^2 dx = frac14 n^{-1}.
        $$

        This implies $int f^2 geq frac14 sum_{n geq 2} n^{-1} = infty$.






        share|cite|improve this answer














        This is false. To build a counterexample, consider functions $g_n(x)$ that is non-zero only on $(n, n + 2n^{-3})$, piecewise linear, with $g_n(n) = g_n(n+2n^{-3}) = 0$ and $g_n(n+n^{-3}) = n$. Then,
        $$
        int g_n(x) dx = frac12 n cdot 2n^{-3} = n^{-2}.
        $$

        Since for $n geq 2$ functions $g_n$ have disjoint support, if we define $f = sum_{n geq 2} g_n$ then $f in L^1([0, infty))$. However, if we take $p = 2$, we have that
        $$
        int g_n(x)^2 dx geq int_{n + frac12 n^{-3}}^{n + frac32 n^{-3}} (frac12 n)^2 dx = frac14 n^{-1}.
        $$

        This implies $int f^2 geq frac14 sum_{n geq 2} n^{-1} = infty$.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Nov 22 at 17:29

























        answered Nov 22 at 16:55









        Daniel

        1,516210




        1,516210






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3009330%2flebesgue-space-inclusion-on-half-real-line%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Ellipse (mathématiques)

            Quarter-circle Tiles

            Mont Emei