Recover complex function from the real part
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I have $Re f(z) = e^x(xcosy -ysiny) = e^xcosy -e^xysiny$. Therefore,
$$v_x= e^xxcosy+e^xcosy-e^xysiny = e^x(xcosy+cosy-ysiny)$$
$$v_y= -e^xxsiny-e^x(siny-ycosy) = e^x(-xsiny-siny+ycosy)$$
$u_x = v_y = e^x(-xsiny-siny+ycosy)$
$u_y = -v_x = -e^x(xcosy+cosy-ysiny)$
$$u = int u_xdx = -int e^x(xsiny+siny-ycosy)dx = ... = -e^x(xsiny-ycosy)$$
To find $u_y$, I do:
$$u_y = -e^x(xcosy+cosy-ysiny) = -e^x(xsiny-ycosy)$$
What do I do from here?
complex-analysis complex-numbers
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I have $Re f(z) = e^x(xcosy -ysiny) = e^xcosy -e^xysiny$. Therefore,
$$v_x= e^xxcosy+e^xcosy-e^xysiny = e^x(xcosy+cosy-ysiny)$$
$$v_y= -e^xxsiny-e^x(siny-ycosy) = e^x(-xsiny-siny+ycosy)$$
$u_x = v_y = e^x(-xsiny-siny+ycosy)$
$u_y = -v_x = -e^x(xcosy+cosy-ysiny)$
$$u = int u_xdx = -int e^x(xsiny+siny-ycosy)dx = ... = -e^x(xsiny-ycosy)$$
To find $u_y$, I do:
$$u_y = -e^x(xcosy+cosy-ysiny) = -e^x(xsiny-ycosy)$$
What do I do from here?
complex-analysis complex-numbers
Integrate what? Which side?
– user3132457
Nov 22 at 18:18
I hadn't well seen : you have found an expression for $u$ that deserves to have a "$+k_1(y)$" (an integration constant that is a function of the other variable). Here is the problem... Now if you do the same thing for the integration of $u_y$, you will have a constant $+k_2(x)$. And now you have to match the two expressions in order to get a single result...
– Jean Marie
Nov 22 at 18:27
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I have $Re f(z) = e^x(xcosy -ysiny) = e^xcosy -e^xysiny$. Therefore,
$$v_x= e^xxcosy+e^xcosy-e^xysiny = e^x(xcosy+cosy-ysiny)$$
$$v_y= -e^xxsiny-e^x(siny-ycosy) = e^x(-xsiny-siny+ycosy)$$
$u_x = v_y = e^x(-xsiny-siny+ycosy)$
$u_y = -v_x = -e^x(xcosy+cosy-ysiny)$
$$u = int u_xdx = -int e^x(xsiny+siny-ycosy)dx = ... = -e^x(xsiny-ycosy)$$
To find $u_y$, I do:
$$u_y = -e^x(xcosy+cosy-ysiny) = -e^x(xsiny-ycosy)$$
What do I do from here?
complex-analysis complex-numbers
I have $Re f(z) = e^x(xcosy -ysiny) = e^xcosy -e^xysiny$. Therefore,
$$v_x= e^xxcosy+e^xcosy-e^xysiny = e^x(xcosy+cosy-ysiny)$$
$$v_y= -e^xxsiny-e^x(siny-ycosy) = e^x(-xsiny-siny+ycosy)$$
$u_x = v_y = e^x(-xsiny-siny+ycosy)$
$u_y = -v_x = -e^x(xcosy+cosy-ysiny)$
$$u = int u_xdx = -int e^x(xsiny+siny-ycosy)dx = ... = -e^x(xsiny-ycosy)$$
To find $u_y$, I do:
$$u_y = -e^x(xcosy+cosy-ysiny) = -e^x(xsiny-ycosy)$$
What do I do from here?
complex-analysis complex-numbers
complex-analysis complex-numbers
edited Nov 22 at 18:36
asked Nov 22 at 17:53
user3132457
926
926
Integrate what? Which side?
– user3132457
Nov 22 at 18:18
I hadn't well seen : you have found an expression for $u$ that deserves to have a "$+k_1(y)$" (an integration constant that is a function of the other variable). Here is the problem... Now if you do the same thing for the integration of $u_y$, you will have a constant $+k_2(x)$. And now you have to match the two expressions in order to get a single result...
– Jean Marie
Nov 22 at 18:27
add a comment |
Integrate what? Which side?
– user3132457
Nov 22 at 18:18
I hadn't well seen : you have found an expression for $u$ that deserves to have a "$+k_1(y)$" (an integration constant that is a function of the other variable). Here is the problem... Now if you do the same thing for the integration of $u_y$, you will have a constant $+k_2(x)$. And now you have to match the two expressions in order to get a single result...
– Jean Marie
Nov 22 at 18:27
Integrate what? Which side?
– user3132457
Nov 22 at 18:18
Integrate what? Which side?
– user3132457
Nov 22 at 18:18
I hadn't well seen : you have found an expression for $u$ that deserves to have a "$+k_1(y)$" (an integration constant that is a function of the other variable). Here is the problem... Now if you do the same thing for the integration of $u_y$, you will have a constant $+k_2(x)$. And now you have to match the two expressions in order to get a single result...
– Jean Marie
Nov 22 at 18:27
I hadn't well seen : you have found an expression for $u$ that deserves to have a "$+k_1(y)$" (an integration constant that is a function of the other variable). Here is the problem... Now if you do the same thing for the integration of $u_y$, you will have a constant $+k_2(x)$. And now you have to match the two expressions in order to get a single result...
– Jean Marie
Nov 22 at 18:27
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
First of all, we observe that
$$
mathrm{e}^x(xcos y-ysin y)=mathrm{Re},big(mathrm{e}^x(cos y+isin y)cdot (x+iy)big)=mathrm{Re},(mathrm{e}^zz).
$$
Next, use the fact that, if $g$ is analytic in some region and $,mathrm{Re}(g)=0$, then $gequiv ic$, where $c$ real constant.
Hence the function you are looking for is $mathrm{e}^zz+ic$.
I don't get why $Re(g)=0$.
– user3132457
Nov 25 at 18:39
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
You know that$$v_x=-u_y=e^xbigl(ycos(y)+sin(y)+xsin(y)bigr)$$and$$v_y=u_x=e^xbigl(cos(y)+xcos(y)-ysin(y)bigr).$$Integrating, you get that$$v(x,y)=e^xbigl(ycos(y)+xsin(y)bigr)+k$$Thereforebegin{align}f(x+yi)&=u(x,y)+v(x,y)i\&=e^xbigl(xcos(y)-ysin(y)bigr)+e^xbigl(ycos(y)+xsin(y)bigr)i+ki\&=e^xbigl((cos(y)+sin(y)ibigr)(x+yi)+ki\&=e^{x+yi}(x+yi)+kiend{align}and so $f(z)=ze^z+ki$.
sorry, the title is wrong, should be real part
– user3132457
Nov 22 at 18:37
I've edited my answer.
– José Carlos Santos
Nov 22 at 18:51
How do you integrate in step 3? I get $$v(x,y)=-e^xbigl(ycos(y)+xsin(y)bigr)+k$$
– user3132457
Nov 25 at 18:37
@user3132457 That function is such that $v_x=-e^xbigl(ycos(y)+sin(y)+xsin(y)bigr)$. But what you should be aiming at is $v_x=e^xbigl(ycos(y)+sin(y)+xsin(y)bigr)$.
– José Carlos Santos
Nov 25 at 18:46
Hmm, I'm confused. In my original post, $v_x$ isn't negative but in your calculations it is.
– user3132457
Nov 25 at 18:51
|
show 2 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3009417%2frecover-complex-function-from-the-real-part%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
First of all, we observe that
$$
mathrm{e}^x(xcos y-ysin y)=mathrm{Re},big(mathrm{e}^x(cos y+isin y)cdot (x+iy)big)=mathrm{Re},(mathrm{e}^zz).
$$
Next, use the fact that, if $g$ is analytic in some region and $,mathrm{Re}(g)=0$, then $gequiv ic$, where $c$ real constant.
Hence the function you are looking for is $mathrm{e}^zz+ic$.
I don't get why $Re(g)=0$.
– user3132457
Nov 25 at 18:39
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
First of all, we observe that
$$
mathrm{e}^x(xcos y-ysin y)=mathrm{Re},big(mathrm{e}^x(cos y+isin y)cdot (x+iy)big)=mathrm{Re},(mathrm{e}^zz).
$$
Next, use the fact that, if $g$ is analytic in some region and $,mathrm{Re}(g)=0$, then $gequiv ic$, where $c$ real constant.
Hence the function you are looking for is $mathrm{e}^zz+ic$.
I don't get why $Re(g)=0$.
– user3132457
Nov 25 at 18:39
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
First of all, we observe that
$$
mathrm{e}^x(xcos y-ysin y)=mathrm{Re},big(mathrm{e}^x(cos y+isin y)cdot (x+iy)big)=mathrm{Re},(mathrm{e}^zz).
$$
Next, use the fact that, if $g$ is analytic in some region and $,mathrm{Re}(g)=0$, then $gequiv ic$, where $c$ real constant.
Hence the function you are looking for is $mathrm{e}^zz+ic$.
First of all, we observe that
$$
mathrm{e}^x(xcos y-ysin y)=mathrm{Re},big(mathrm{e}^x(cos y+isin y)cdot (x+iy)big)=mathrm{Re},(mathrm{e}^zz).
$$
Next, use the fact that, if $g$ is analytic in some region and $,mathrm{Re}(g)=0$, then $gequiv ic$, where $c$ real constant.
Hence the function you are looking for is $mathrm{e}^zz+ic$.
answered Nov 22 at 18:48
Yiorgos S. Smyrlis
62.3k1383162
62.3k1383162
I don't get why $Re(g)=0$.
– user3132457
Nov 25 at 18:39
add a comment |
I don't get why $Re(g)=0$.
– user3132457
Nov 25 at 18:39
I don't get why $Re(g)=0$.
– user3132457
Nov 25 at 18:39
I don't get why $Re(g)=0$.
– user3132457
Nov 25 at 18:39
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
You know that$$v_x=-u_y=e^xbigl(ycos(y)+sin(y)+xsin(y)bigr)$$and$$v_y=u_x=e^xbigl(cos(y)+xcos(y)-ysin(y)bigr).$$Integrating, you get that$$v(x,y)=e^xbigl(ycos(y)+xsin(y)bigr)+k$$Thereforebegin{align}f(x+yi)&=u(x,y)+v(x,y)i\&=e^xbigl(xcos(y)-ysin(y)bigr)+e^xbigl(ycos(y)+xsin(y)bigr)i+ki\&=e^xbigl((cos(y)+sin(y)ibigr)(x+yi)+ki\&=e^{x+yi}(x+yi)+kiend{align}and so $f(z)=ze^z+ki$.
sorry, the title is wrong, should be real part
– user3132457
Nov 22 at 18:37
I've edited my answer.
– José Carlos Santos
Nov 22 at 18:51
How do you integrate in step 3? I get $$v(x,y)=-e^xbigl(ycos(y)+xsin(y)bigr)+k$$
– user3132457
Nov 25 at 18:37
@user3132457 That function is such that $v_x=-e^xbigl(ycos(y)+sin(y)+xsin(y)bigr)$. But what you should be aiming at is $v_x=e^xbigl(ycos(y)+sin(y)+xsin(y)bigr)$.
– José Carlos Santos
Nov 25 at 18:46
Hmm, I'm confused. In my original post, $v_x$ isn't negative but in your calculations it is.
– user3132457
Nov 25 at 18:51
|
show 2 more comments
up vote
1
down vote
You know that$$v_x=-u_y=e^xbigl(ycos(y)+sin(y)+xsin(y)bigr)$$and$$v_y=u_x=e^xbigl(cos(y)+xcos(y)-ysin(y)bigr).$$Integrating, you get that$$v(x,y)=e^xbigl(ycos(y)+xsin(y)bigr)+k$$Thereforebegin{align}f(x+yi)&=u(x,y)+v(x,y)i\&=e^xbigl(xcos(y)-ysin(y)bigr)+e^xbigl(ycos(y)+xsin(y)bigr)i+ki\&=e^xbigl((cos(y)+sin(y)ibigr)(x+yi)+ki\&=e^{x+yi}(x+yi)+kiend{align}and so $f(z)=ze^z+ki$.
sorry, the title is wrong, should be real part
– user3132457
Nov 22 at 18:37
I've edited my answer.
– José Carlos Santos
Nov 22 at 18:51
How do you integrate in step 3? I get $$v(x,y)=-e^xbigl(ycos(y)+xsin(y)bigr)+k$$
– user3132457
Nov 25 at 18:37
@user3132457 That function is such that $v_x=-e^xbigl(ycos(y)+sin(y)+xsin(y)bigr)$. But what you should be aiming at is $v_x=e^xbigl(ycos(y)+sin(y)+xsin(y)bigr)$.
– José Carlos Santos
Nov 25 at 18:46
Hmm, I'm confused. In my original post, $v_x$ isn't negative but in your calculations it is.
– user3132457
Nov 25 at 18:51
|
show 2 more comments
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
You know that$$v_x=-u_y=e^xbigl(ycos(y)+sin(y)+xsin(y)bigr)$$and$$v_y=u_x=e^xbigl(cos(y)+xcos(y)-ysin(y)bigr).$$Integrating, you get that$$v(x,y)=e^xbigl(ycos(y)+xsin(y)bigr)+k$$Thereforebegin{align}f(x+yi)&=u(x,y)+v(x,y)i\&=e^xbigl(xcos(y)-ysin(y)bigr)+e^xbigl(ycos(y)+xsin(y)bigr)i+ki\&=e^xbigl((cos(y)+sin(y)ibigr)(x+yi)+ki\&=e^{x+yi}(x+yi)+kiend{align}and so $f(z)=ze^z+ki$.
You know that$$v_x=-u_y=e^xbigl(ycos(y)+sin(y)+xsin(y)bigr)$$and$$v_y=u_x=e^xbigl(cos(y)+xcos(y)-ysin(y)bigr).$$Integrating, you get that$$v(x,y)=e^xbigl(ycos(y)+xsin(y)bigr)+k$$Thereforebegin{align}f(x+yi)&=u(x,y)+v(x,y)i\&=e^xbigl(xcos(y)-ysin(y)bigr)+e^xbigl(ycos(y)+xsin(y)bigr)i+ki\&=e^xbigl((cos(y)+sin(y)ibigr)(x+yi)+ki\&=e^{x+yi}(x+yi)+kiend{align}and so $f(z)=ze^z+ki$.
edited Nov 22 at 18:51
answered Nov 22 at 18:29
José Carlos Santos
147k22117217
147k22117217
sorry, the title is wrong, should be real part
– user3132457
Nov 22 at 18:37
I've edited my answer.
– José Carlos Santos
Nov 22 at 18:51
How do you integrate in step 3? I get $$v(x,y)=-e^xbigl(ycos(y)+xsin(y)bigr)+k$$
– user3132457
Nov 25 at 18:37
@user3132457 That function is such that $v_x=-e^xbigl(ycos(y)+sin(y)+xsin(y)bigr)$. But what you should be aiming at is $v_x=e^xbigl(ycos(y)+sin(y)+xsin(y)bigr)$.
– José Carlos Santos
Nov 25 at 18:46
Hmm, I'm confused. In my original post, $v_x$ isn't negative but in your calculations it is.
– user3132457
Nov 25 at 18:51
|
show 2 more comments
sorry, the title is wrong, should be real part
– user3132457
Nov 22 at 18:37
I've edited my answer.
– José Carlos Santos
Nov 22 at 18:51
How do you integrate in step 3? I get $$v(x,y)=-e^xbigl(ycos(y)+xsin(y)bigr)+k$$
– user3132457
Nov 25 at 18:37
@user3132457 That function is such that $v_x=-e^xbigl(ycos(y)+sin(y)+xsin(y)bigr)$. But what you should be aiming at is $v_x=e^xbigl(ycos(y)+sin(y)+xsin(y)bigr)$.
– José Carlos Santos
Nov 25 at 18:46
Hmm, I'm confused. In my original post, $v_x$ isn't negative but in your calculations it is.
– user3132457
Nov 25 at 18:51
sorry, the title is wrong, should be real part
– user3132457
Nov 22 at 18:37
sorry, the title is wrong, should be real part
– user3132457
Nov 22 at 18:37
I've edited my answer.
– José Carlos Santos
Nov 22 at 18:51
I've edited my answer.
– José Carlos Santos
Nov 22 at 18:51
How do you integrate in step 3? I get $$v(x,y)=-e^xbigl(ycos(y)+xsin(y)bigr)+k$$
– user3132457
Nov 25 at 18:37
How do you integrate in step 3? I get $$v(x,y)=-e^xbigl(ycos(y)+xsin(y)bigr)+k$$
– user3132457
Nov 25 at 18:37
@user3132457 That function is such that $v_x=-e^xbigl(ycos(y)+sin(y)+xsin(y)bigr)$. But what you should be aiming at is $v_x=e^xbigl(ycos(y)+sin(y)+xsin(y)bigr)$.
– José Carlos Santos
Nov 25 at 18:46
@user3132457 That function is such that $v_x=-e^xbigl(ycos(y)+sin(y)+xsin(y)bigr)$. But what you should be aiming at is $v_x=e^xbigl(ycos(y)+sin(y)+xsin(y)bigr)$.
– José Carlos Santos
Nov 25 at 18:46
Hmm, I'm confused. In my original post, $v_x$ isn't negative but in your calculations it is.
– user3132457
Nov 25 at 18:51
Hmm, I'm confused. In my original post, $v_x$ isn't negative but in your calculations it is.
– user3132457
Nov 25 at 18:51
|
show 2 more comments
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3009417%2frecover-complex-function-from-the-real-part%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Integrate what? Which side?
– user3132457
Nov 22 at 18:18
I hadn't well seen : you have found an expression for $u$ that deserves to have a "$+k_1(y)$" (an integration constant that is a function of the other variable). Here is the problem... Now if you do the same thing for the integration of $u_y$, you will have a constant $+k_2(x)$. And now you have to match the two expressions in order to get a single result...
– Jean Marie
Nov 22 at 18:27