Prove function is identically 0 on an open set from it being 0 on a subset of the boundary











up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1












This is a homework question so please don't provide the full proof.



Hi everyone,



Let $f$ be holomorphic on the open square $U = {zin mathbb{C}: |Re ,z| <1, |Im ,z| < 1}$ and continuous on its closure $bar{U}$. Suppose $f=0$ on ${zin bar{U}: Re , z =1}$, prove $f = 0$ on $U$.



My attempt



Method 1: By Max Modulus Theorem, $max_{zin U} |f(z)| = max_{zin partial U} |f(z)|$, so it suffices to show that $f$ is identically $0$ on the four edges of the rectangle. To this end, I am trying to use the Identity Theorem, but I don't see how it can be applied.



Another method: Define $g(z) = f(iz + i)$, then by assumption, $g$ is identically $0$ on $(-1, 1)$, holomorphic on ${zin mathbb{C}: -1< Re ,z <1, -2<Im ,z < 0}$. Then I am trying to use the Schwarz reflection principle to extend this function to a holomorphic function on the entire plane and then apply the Identity Theorem. But since this function is only holomorphic on a subset of the lower half plane, I don't see how Schwarz reflection principle can be applied.



Some hints would be greatly appreciated. Thanks a lot.










share|cite|improve this question


























    up vote
    2
    down vote

    favorite
    1












    This is a homework question so please don't provide the full proof.



    Hi everyone,



    Let $f$ be holomorphic on the open square $U = {zin mathbb{C}: |Re ,z| <1, |Im ,z| < 1}$ and continuous on its closure $bar{U}$. Suppose $f=0$ on ${zin bar{U}: Re , z =1}$, prove $f = 0$ on $U$.



    My attempt



    Method 1: By Max Modulus Theorem, $max_{zin U} |f(z)| = max_{zin partial U} |f(z)|$, so it suffices to show that $f$ is identically $0$ on the four edges of the rectangle. To this end, I am trying to use the Identity Theorem, but I don't see how it can be applied.



    Another method: Define $g(z) = f(iz + i)$, then by assumption, $g$ is identically $0$ on $(-1, 1)$, holomorphic on ${zin mathbb{C}: -1< Re ,z <1, -2<Im ,z < 0}$. Then I am trying to use the Schwarz reflection principle to extend this function to a holomorphic function on the entire plane and then apply the Identity Theorem. But since this function is only holomorphic on a subset of the lower half plane, I don't see how Schwarz reflection principle can be applied.



    Some hints would be greatly appreciated. Thanks a lot.










    share|cite|improve this question
























      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1





      This is a homework question so please don't provide the full proof.



      Hi everyone,



      Let $f$ be holomorphic on the open square $U = {zin mathbb{C}: |Re ,z| <1, |Im ,z| < 1}$ and continuous on its closure $bar{U}$. Suppose $f=0$ on ${zin bar{U}: Re , z =1}$, prove $f = 0$ on $U$.



      My attempt



      Method 1: By Max Modulus Theorem, $max_{zin U} |f(z)| = max_{zin partial U} |f(z)|$, so it suffices to show that $f$ is identically $0$ on the four edges of the rectangle. To this end, I am trying to use the Identity Theorem, but I don't see how it can be applied.



      Another method: Define $g(z) = f(iz + i)$, then by assumption, $g$ is identically $0$ on $(-1, 1)$, holomorphic on ${zin mathbb{C}: -1< Re ,z <1, -2<Im ,z < 0}$. Then I am trying to use the Schwarz reflection principle to extend this function to a holomorphic function on the entire plane and then apply the Identity Theorem. But since this function is only holomorphic on a subset of the lower half plane, I don't see how Schwarz reflection principle can be applied.



      Some hints would be greatly appreciated. Thanks a lot.










      share|cite|improve this question













      This is a homework question so please don't provide the full proof.



      Hi everyone,



      Let $f$ be holomorphic on the open square $U = {zin mathbb{C}: |Re ,z| <1, |Im ,z| < 1}$ and continuous on its closure $bar{U}$. Suppose $f=0$ on ${zin bar{U}: Re , z =1}$, prove $f = 0$ on $U$.



      My attempt



      Method 1: By Max Modulus Theorem, $max_{zin U} |f(z)| = max_{zin partial U} |f(z)|$, so it suffices to show that $f$ is identically $0$ on the four edges of the rectangle. To this end, I am trying to use the Identity Theorem, but I don't see how it can be applied.



      Another method: Define $g(z) = f(iz + i)$, then by assumption, $g$ is identically $0$ on $(-1, 1)$, holomorphic on ${zin mathbb{C}: -1< Re ,z <1, -2<Im ,z < 0}$. Then I am trying to use the Schwarz reflection principle to extend this function to a holomorphic function on the entire plane and then apply the Identity Theorem. But since this function is only holomorphic on a subset of the lower half plane, I don't see how Schwarz reflection principle can be applied.



      Some hints would be greatly appreciated. Thanks a lot.







      complex-analysis






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Nov 15 at 23:34









      mkmlp

      151211




      151211






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          4
          down vote



          accepted










          Hint: consider $f(z)f(iz)$. Show that if a product of two analytic functions is $0$ then one of them must be $0$.






          share|cite|improve this answer




























            up vote
            1
            down vote













            This answer is based on Kavi Rama Murthy's hint (and also a hint from the instructor of my class, which is similar to Kavi's, actually). Many thanks to Kavi!



            First , define $g_1(z) = f(iz)$. It is immediate that $g$ is holomorphic on $U$, continuous on $overline{U}$ and is $0$ for all ${zin overline{U} mid Im, z = -1}$.



            Similarly, if we define $g_2(z) = f(-z), g_3(z) = f(-iz), g_4(z) = f(z)$, then $g = g_1g_2g_3g_4$ is holomorphic on $U$, continuous on $overline{U}$ and identically $0$ on $partial U$.



            By Max Modulus Theorem,
            begin{equation}
            max_{zin U} |g(z)| = max_{zin partial U} |g(z)| = 0,
            end{equation}

            proving $g(z) = 0$ for all $zin overline{U}$, which implies that for any $z in overline{U}$, there exists $iin {1, 2, 3, 4}$ such that $g_i(z)=0$. And this is of course true for any $zin overline{B_{1/2}(0)}$ as well.



            Since $overline{B_{1/2}(0)}$ is uncountable, one of the sets ${zin overline{B_{1/2}(0)} mid g_i(z)=0}$, $i = 1, 2, 3, 4$, must be uncountable and hence must have a limit point in $overline{B_{1/2}(0)} subseteq U$ by compactness of $overline{B_{1/2}(0)}$.



            By Identity Theorem, for this particular $i$, $g_i$ is identically $0$ on $U$.



            It is easy to see from the definitions of $g_1, g_2, g_3, g_4$ that this implies $f$ being identically $0$ on $U$ regardless of what $i$ is, proving the result.






            share|cite|improve this answer





















              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














               

              draft saved


              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3000492%2fprove-function-is-identically-0-on-an-open-set-from-it-being-0-on-a-subset-of-th%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes








              up vote
              4
              down vote



              accepted










              Hint: consider $f(z)f(iz)$. Show that if a product of two analytic functions is $0$ then one of them must be $0$.






              share|cite|improve this answer

























                up vote
                4
                down vote



                accepted










                Hint: consider $f(z)f(iz)$. Show that if a product of two analytic functions is $0$ then one of them must be $0$.






                share|cite|improve this answer























                  up vote
                  4
                  down vote



                  accepted







                  up vote
                  4
                  down vote



                  accepted






                  Hint: consider $f(z)f(iz)$. Show that if a product of two analytic functions is $0$ then one of them must be $0$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  Hint: consider $f(z)f(iz)$. Show that if a product of two analytic functions is $0$ then one of them must be $0$.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Nov 15 at 23:53









                  Kavi Rama Murthy

                  40.7k31751




                  40.7k31751






















                      up vote
                      1
                      down vote













                      This answer is based on Kavi Rama Murthy's hint (and also a hint from the instructor of my class, which is similar to Kavi's, actually). Many thanks to Kavi!



                      First , define $g_1(z) = f(iz)$. It is immediate that $g$ is holomorphic on $U$, continuous on $overline{U}$ and is $0$ for all ${zin overline{U} mid Im, z = -1}$.



                      Similarly, if we define $g_2(z) = f(-z), g_3(z) = f(-iz), g_4(z) = f(z)$, then $g = g_1g_2g_3g_4$ is holomorphic on $U$, continuous on $overline{U}$ and identically $0$ on $partial U$.



                      By Max Modulus Theorem,
                      begin{equation}
                      max_{zin U} |g(z)| = max_{zin partial U} |g(z)| = 0,
                      end{equation}

                      proving $g(z) = 0$ for all $zin overline{U}$, which implies that for any $z in overline{U}$, there exists $iin {1, 2, 3, 4}$ such that $g_i(z)=0$. And this is of course true for any $zin overline{B_{1/2}(0)}$ as well.



                      Since $overline{B_{1/2}(0)}$ is uncountable, one of the sets ${zin overline{B_{1/2}(0)} mid g_i(z)=0}$, $i = 1, 2, 3, 4$, must be uncountable and hence must have a limit point in $overline{B_{1/2}(0)} subseteq U$ by compactness of $overline{B_{1/2}(0)}$.



                      By Identity Theorem, for this particular $i$, $g_i$ is identically $0$ on $U$.



                      It is easy to see from the definitions of $g_1, g_2, g_3, g_4$ that this implies $f$ being identically $0$ on $U$ regardless of what $i$ is, proving the result.






                      share|cite|improve this answer

























                        up vote
                        1
                        down vote













                        This answer is based on Kavi Rama Murthy's hint (and also a hint from the instructor of my class, which is similar to Kavi's, actually). Many thanks to Kavi!



                        First , define $g_1(z) = f(iz)$. It is immediate that $g$ is holomorphic on $U$, continuous on $overline{U}$ and is $0$ for all ${zin overline{U} mid Im, z = -1}$.



                        Similarly, if we define $g_2(z) = f(-z), g_3(z) = f(-iz), g_4(z) = f(z)$, then $g = g_1g_2g_3g_4$ is holomorphic on $U$, continuous on $overline{U}$ and identically $0$ on $partial U$.



                        By Max Modulus Theorem,
                        begin{equation}
                        max_{zin U} |g(z)| = max_{zin partial U} |g(z)| = 0,
                        end{equation}

                        proving $g(z) = 0$ for all $zin overline{U}$, which implies that for any $z in overline{U}$, there exists $iin {1, 2, 3, 4}$ such that $g_i(z)=0$. And this is of course true for any $zin overline{B_{1/2}(0)}$ as well.



                        Since $overline{B_{1/2}(0)}$ is uncountable, one of the sets ${zin overline{B_{1/2}(0)} mid g_i(z)=0}$, $i = 1, 2, 3, 4$, must be uncountable and hence must have a limit point in $overline{B_{1/2}(0)} subseteq U$ by compactness of $overline{B_{1/2}(0)}$.



                        By Identity Theorem, for this particular $i$, $g_i$ is identically $0$ on $U$.



                        It is easy to see from the definitions of $g_1, g_2, g_3, g_4$ that this implies $f$ being identically $0$ on $U$ regardless of what $i$ is, proving the result.






                        share|cite|improve this answer























                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote










                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote









                          This answer is based on Kavi Rama Murthy's hint (and also a hint from the instructor of my class, which is similar to Kavi's, actually). Many thanks to Kavi!



                          First , define $g_1(z) = f(iz)$. It is immediate that $g$ is holomorphic on $U$, continuous on $overline{U}$ and is $0$ for all ${zin overline{U} mid Im, z = -1}$.



                          Similarly, if we define $g_2(z) = f(-z), g_3(z) = f(-iz), g_4(z) = f(z)$, then $g = g_1g_2g_3g_4$ is holomorphic on $U$, continuous on $overline{U}$ and identically $0$ on $partial U$.



                          By Max Modulus Theorem,
                          begin{equation}
                          max_{zin U} |g(z)| = max_{zin partial U} |g(z)| = 0,
                          end{equation}

                          proving $g(z) = 0$ for all $zin overline{U}$, which implies that for any $z in overline{U}$, there exists $iin {1, 2, 3, 4}$ such that $g_i(z)=0$. And this is of course true for any $zin overline{B_{1/2}(0)}$ as well.



                          Since $overline{B_{1/2}(0)}$ is uncountable, one of the sets ${zin overline{B_{1/2}(0)} mid g_i(z)=0}$, $i = 1, 2, 3, 4$, must be uncountable and hence must have a limit point in $overline{B_{1/2}(0)} subseteq U$ by compactness of $overline{B_{1/2}(0)}$.



                          By Identity Theorem, for this particular $i$, $g_i$ is identically $0$ on $U$.



                          It is easy to see from the definitions of $g_1, g_2, g_3, g_4$ that this implies $f$ being identically $0$ on $U$ regardless of what $i$ is, proving the result.






                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          This answer is based on Kavi Rama Murthy's hint (and also a hint from the instructor of my class, which is similar to Kavi's, actually). Many thanks to Kavi!



                          First , define $g_1(z) = f(iz)$. It is immediate that $g$ is holomorphic on $U$, continuous on $overline{U}$ and is $0$ for all ${zin overline{U} mid Im, z = -1}$.



                          Similarly, if we define $g_2(z) = f(-z), g_3(z) = f(-iz), g_4(z) = f(z)$, then $g = g_1g_2g_3g_4$ is holomorphic on $U$, continuous on $overline{U}$ and identically $0$ on $partial U$.



                          By Max Modulus Theorem,
                          begin{equation}
                          max_{zin U} |g(z)| = max_{zin partial U} |g(z)| = 0,
                          end{equation}

                          proving $g(z) = 0$ for all $zin overline{U}$, which implies that for any $z in overline{U}$, there exists $iin {1, 2, 3, 4}$ such that $g_i(z)=0$. And this is of course true for any $zin overline{B_{1/2}(0)}$ as well.



                          Since $overline{B_{1/2}(0)}$ is uncountable, one of the sets ${zin overline{B_{1/2}(0)} mid g_i(z)=0}$, $i = 1, 2, 3, 4$, must be uncountable and hence must have a limit point in $overline{B_{1/2}(0)} subseteq U$ by compactness of $overline{B_{1/2}(0)}$.



                          By Identity Theorem, for this particular $i$, $g_i$ is identically $0$ on $U$.



                          It is easy to see from the definitions of $g_1, g_2, g_3, g_4$ that this implies $f$ being identically $0$ on $U$ regardless of what $i$ is, proving the result.







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered Nov 16 at 1:38









                          mkmlp

                          151211




                          151211






























                               

                              draft saved


                              draft discarded



















































                               


                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3000492%2fprove-function-is-identically-0-on-an-open-set-from-it-being-0-on-a-subset-of-th%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Quarter-circle Tiles

                              build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

                              Mont Emei