Why the expectation of distance to center of disk is $r/3$ and not $r/2$?












1












$begingroup$


A person throw an arrow on a target of radius $r$. The position of the arrow on the target is uniformly distributed. Let $X$ the distance between the arrow and the center of the circle. The score obtained by a person is $r-X$. What is the average score ? The answer is $frac{r}{3}$, whereas I found $frac{r}{2}$ as follow



We have that $X$ is uniform on $[0,r]$. If $Y=r-X$, then $$mathbb E[Y]=int_0^r (r-x)f_X(x)dx=frac{1}{r}int_0^r (r-x)dx=frac{r}{2}.$$



Maybe there is a subtlety than I don't see ?






probability expected-value







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Why do you think $X$ is uniform on $[0,r]$?
    $endgroup$
    – 5xum
    Nov 30 '18 at 9:13










  • $begingroup$
    @5xum : I set $Z=(Rcos Theta, Rsin Theta)$ with $R$ uniform on $[0,r]$ and $Theta$ uniform on $[0,2pi)$. Then $mathbb P{Xleq x}=mathbb P{Rleq x, Theta in [0,2pi]}=frac{x}{r}.$ It doesn't work ?
    $endgroup$
    – idm
    Nov 30 '18 at 9:14












  • $begingroup$
    Uniform over the disc does not mean the distribution of the distance from the center is uniform. The probability density of points in a circle sharing a centre with the disc will be inversely proportional to the radius of the circle (if less than $r$), not a constant.$$dfrac{mathsf d ~~}{mathsf d~x}mathsf P(Xleqslant x)~propto~dfrac{1}{x}mathbf 1_{0< xleqslant r}$$
    $endgroup$
    – Graham Kemp
    Nov 30 '18 at 9:23










  • $begingroup$
    We just had a question like this half a day ago: Average distance from center of circle
    $endgroup$
    – Rahul
    Nov 30 '18 at 9:25






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $mathbb P{Xleq x} = frac{pi x^2}{pi r^2}$ as you are equally likely to land at any point on the area of the board, not equally likely to land at any radial distance from the centre.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul
    Nov 30 '18 at 9:30
















1












$begingroup$


A person throw an arrow on a target of radius $r$. The position of the arrow on the target is uniformly distributed. Let $X$ the distance between the arrow and the center of the circle. The score obtained by a person is $r-X$. What is the average score ? The answer is $frac{r}{3}$, whereas I found $frac{r}{2}$ as follow



We have that $X$ is uniform on $[0,r]$. If $Y=r-X$, then $$mathbb E[Y]=int_0^r (r-x)f_X(x)dx=frac{1}{r}int_0^r (r-x)dx=frac{r}{2}.$$



Maybe there is a subtlety than I don't see ?






probability expected-value







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Why do you think $X$ is uniform on $[0,r]$?
    $endgroup$
    – 5xum
    Nov 30 '18 at 9:13










  • $begingroup$
    @5xum : I set $Z=(Rcos Theta, Rsin Theta)$ with $R$ uniform on $[0,r]$ and $Theta$ uniform on $[0,2pi)$. Then $mathbb P{Xleq x}=mathbb P{Rleq x, Theta in [0,2pi]}=frac{x}{r}.$ It doesn't work ?
    $endgroup$
    – idm
    Nov 30 '18 at 9:14












  • $begingroup$
    Uniform over the disc does not mean the distribution of the distance from the center is uniform. The probability density of points in a circle sharing a centre with the disc will be inversely proportional to the radius of the circle (if less than $r$), not a constant.$$dfrac{mathsf d ~~}{mathsf d~x}mathsf P(Xleqslant x)~propto~dfrac{1}{x}mathbf 1_{0< xleqslant r}$$
    $endgroup$
    – Graham Kemp
    Nov 30 '18 at 9:23










  • $begingroup$
    We just had a question like this half a day ago: Average distance from center of circle
    $endgroup$
    – Rahul
    Nov 30 '18 at 9:25






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $mathbb P{Xleq x} = frac{pi x^2}{pi r^2}$ as you are equally likely to land at any point on the area of the board, not equally likely to land at any radial distance from the centre.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul
    Nov 30 '18 at 9:30














1












1








1


0



$begingroup$


A person throw an arrow on a target of radius $r$. The position of the arrow on the target is uniformly distributed. Let $X$ the distance between the arrow and the center of the circle. The score obtained by a person is $r-X$. What is the average score ? The answer is $frac{r}{3}$, whereas I found $frac{r}{2}$ as follow



We have that $X$ is uniform on $[0,r]$. If $Y=r-X$, then $$mathbb E[Y]=int_0^r (r-x)f_X(x)dx=frac{1}{r}int_0^r (r-x)dx=frac{r}{2}.$$



Maybe there is a subtlety than I don't see ?






probability expected-value







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




A person throw an arrow on a target of radius $r$. The position of the arrow on the target is uniformly distributed. Let $X$ the distance between the arrow and the center of the circle. The score obtained by a person is $r-X$. What is the average score ? The answer is $frac{r}{3}$, whereas I found $frac{r}{2}$ as follow



We have that $X$ is uniform on $[0,r]$. If $Y=r-X$, then $$mathbb E[Y]=int_0^r (r-x)f_X(x)dx=frac{1}{r}int_0^r (r-x)dx=frac{r}{2}.$$



Maybe there is a subtlety than I don't see ?






probability expected-value




probability expected-value






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 30 '18 at 9:14









David G. Stork

10.2k21332




10.2k21332










asked Nov 30 '18 at 9:11









idmidm

8,56921345




8,56921345








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Why do you think $X$ is uniform on $[0,r]$?
    $endgroup$
    – 5xum
    Nov 30 '18 at 9:13










  • $begingroup$
    @5xum : I set $Z=(Rcos Theta, Rsin Theta)$ with $R$ uniform on $[0,r]$ and $Theta$ uniform on $[0,2pi)$. Then $mathbb P{Xleq x}=mathbb P{Rleq x, Theta in [0,2pi]}=frac{x}{r}.$ It doesn't work ?
    $endgroup$
    – idm
    Nov 30 '18 at 9:14












  • $begingroup$
    Uniform over the disc does not mean the distribution of the distance from the center is uniform. The probability density of points in a circle sharing a centre with the disc will be inversely proportional to the radius of the circle (if less than $r$), not a constant.$$dfrac{mathsf d ~~}{mathsf d~x}mathsf P(Xleqslant x)~propto~dfrac{1}{x}mathbf 1_{0< xleqslant r}$$
    $endgroup$
    – Graham Kemp
    Nov 30 '18 at 9:23










  • $begingroup$
    We just had a question like this half a day ago: Average distance from center of circle
    $endgroup$
    – Rahul
    Nov 30 '18 at 9:25






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $mathbb P{Xleq x} = frac{pi x^2}{pi r^2}$ as you are equally likely to land at any point on the area of the board, not equally likely to land at any radial distance from the centre.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul
    Nov 30 '18 at 9:30














  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Why do you think $X$ is uniform on $[0,r]$?
    $endgroup$
    – 5xum
    Nov 30 '18 at 9:13










  • $begingroup$
    @5xum : I set $Z=(Rcos Theta, Rsin Theta)$ with $R$ uniform on $[0,r]$ and $Theta$ uniform on $[0,2pi)$. Then $mathbb P{Xleq x}=mathbb P{Rleq x, Theta in [0,2pi]}=frac{x}{r}.$ It doesn't work ?
    $endgroup$
    – idm
    Nov 30 '18 at 9:14












  • $begingroup$
    Uniform over the disc does not mean the distribution of the distance from the center is uniform. The probability density of points in a circle sharing a centre with the disc will be inversely proportional to the radius of the circle (if less than $r$), not a constant.$$dfrac{mathsf d ~~}{mathsf d~x}mathsf P(Xleqslant x)~propto~dfrac{1}{x}mathbf 1_{0< xleqslant r}$$
    $endgroup$
    – Graham Kemp
    Nov 30 '18 at 9:23










  • $begingroup$
    We just had a question like this half a day ago: Average distance from center of circle
    $endgroup$
    – Rahul
    Nov 30 '18 at 9:25






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $mathbb P{Xleq x} = frac{pi x^2}{pi r^2}$ as you are equally likely to land at any point on the area of the board, not equally likely to land at any radial distance from the centre.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul
    Nov 30 '18 at 9:30








2




2




$begingroup$
Why do you think $X$ is uniform on $[0,r]$?
$endgroup$
– 5xum
Nov 30 '18 at 9:13




$begingroup$
Why do you think $X$ is uniform on $[0,r]$?
$endgroup$
– 5xum
Nov 30 '18 at 9:13












$begingroup$
@5xum : I set $Z=(Rcos Theta, Rsin Theta)$ with $R$ uniform on $[0,r]$ and $Theta$ uniform on $[0,2pi)$. Then $mathbb P{Xleq x}=mathbb P{Rleq x, Theta in [0,2pi]}=frac{x}{r}.$ It doesn't work ?
$endgroup$
– idm
Nov 30 '18 at 9:14






$begingroup$
@5xum : I set $Z=(Rcos Theta, Rsin Theta)$ with $R$ uniform on $[0,r]$ and $Theta$ uniform on $[0,2pi)$. Then $mathbb P{Xleq x}=mathbb P{Rleq x, Theta in [0,2pi]}=frac{x}{r}.$ It doesn't work ?
$endgroup$
– idm
Nov 30 '18 at 9:14














$begingroup$
Uniform over the disc does not mean the distribution of the distance from the center is uniform. The probability density of points in a circle sharing a centre with the disc will be inversely proportional to the radius of the circle (if less than $r$), not a constant.$$dfrac{mathsf d ~~}{mathsf d~x}mathsf P(Xleqslant x)~propto~dfrac{1}{x}mathbf 1_{0< xleqslant r}$$
$endgroup$
– Graham Kemp
Nov 30 '18 at 9:23




$begingroup$
Uniform over the disc does not mean the distribution of the distance from the center is uniform. The probability density of points in a circle sharing a centre with the disc will be inversely proportional to the radius of the circle (if less than $r$), not a constant.$$dfrac{mathsf d ~~}{mathsf d~x}mathsf P(Xleqslant x)~propto~dfrac{1}{x}mathbf 1_{0< xleqslant r}$$
$endgroup$
– Graham Kemp
Nov 30 '18 at 9:23












$begingroup$
We just had a question like this half a day ago: Average distance from center of circle
$endgroup$
– Rahul
Nov 30 '18 at 9:25




$begingroup$
We just had a question like this half a day ago: Average distance from center of circle
$endgroup$
– Rahul
Nov 30 '18 at 9:25




1




1




$begingroup$
$mathbb P{Xleq x} = frac{pi x^2}{pi r^2}$ as you are equally likely to land at any point on the area of the board, not equally likely to land at any radial distance from the centre.
$endgroup$
– Paul
Nov 30 '18 at 9:30




$begingroup$
$mathbb P{Xleq x} = frac{pi x^2}{pi r^2}$ as you are equally likely to land at any point on the area of the board, not equally likely to land at any radial distance from the centre.
$endgroup$
– Paul
Nov 30 '18 at 9:30










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

$$F_X(x) = frac{pi x^2}{pi r^2}$$



$$f_X(x)=frac{2x}{r^2}$$



begin{align}
E[r-X]&=r-E[X] \
&=r - frac1{r^2}int_0^r 2x^2, dx\
&= r - frac1{r^2}frac{2r^3}3\
&= frac{r}{3}
end{align}






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I don't get why $F_X(x)=frac{x^2}{r^2}$
    $endgroup$
    – idm
    Nov 30 '18 at 9:29










  • $begingroup$
    That is the meaning of uniform over an area, if you draw a circle of the same size on the target, it is equally likely to hit either of them.
    $endgroup$
    – Siong Thye Goh
    Nov 30 '18 at 9:30












  • $begingroup$
    Ok I see, thank you. But if $Z=(RcosTheta,RsinTheta)$ with $R$ uniform in $[0,r]$ and $Theta$ uniform on $[0,2pi]$, why $$mathbb P{|Z|leq x}=mathbb P{Rleq x,Thetain [0,2pi]}=mathbb P{Rleq x}=frac{x}{r}$$ is not true ? I really don't get this point
    $endgroup$
    – idm
    Nov 30 '18 at 9:41










  • $begingroup$
    the assumption that $R$ is uniform in $[0,r]$ is not valid.
    $endgroup$
    – Siong Thye Goh
    Nov 30 '18 at 9:45










  • $begingroup$
    ok, stange... thank you :)
    $endgroup$
    – idm
    Nov 30 '18 at 9:46



















1












$begingroup$

You may first construct the probability density as follows:




  • At distance $x$ from the center of the circle a corresponding annulus of "thickness" $dx$ has a probability weight of
    $$frac{1}{pi r^2}cdot 2pi cdot x cdot dx$$


So, you get
$$E(Y) = frac{1}{pi r^2} int_0^r (r-x)2pi cdot x; dx = cdots = frac{r}{3}$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    -1












    $begingroup$

    $$frac{int_0^r(r-x)x.dx}{int_0^r x.dx}$$



    This gives $r/3$.



    The problem with the integral you gave at first, is that the $(r-x)$ needs to be weighted by an $x.dx$, as this is the elemental area of the disc presented by a strip of thickness $dx$ at radius $x$ (or rather $2pi x.dx$ ... but then the $2pi$ appears on the top & bottom & obviously cancels ... or to put it another way, we could do the calculation for any sector of the disc & get the same result) - the catchment, if you like, at radius $x$.



    Basically you're calculating the mean value of $r-x$ over a sector of a disc, or over a whole disc - it makes no difference.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3019856%2fwhy-the-expectation-of-distance-to-center-of-disk-is-r-3-and-not-r-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      2












      $begingroup$

      $$F_X(x) = frac{pi x^2}{pi r^2}$$



      $$f_X(x)=frac{2x}{r^2}$$



      begin{align}
      E[r-X]&=r-E[X] \
      &=r - frac1{r^2}int_0^r 2x^2, dx\
      &= r - frac1{r^2}frac{2r^3}3\
      &= frac{r}{3}
      end{align}






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$













      • $begingroup$
        I don't get why $F_X(x)=frac{x^2}{r^2}$
        $endgroup$
        – idm
        Nov 30 '18 at 9:29










      • $begingroup$
        That is the meaning of uniform over an area, if you draw a circle of the same size on the target, it is equally likely to hit either of them.
        $endgroup$
        – Siong Thye Goh
        Nov 30 '18 at 9:30












      • $begingroup$
        Ok I see, thank you. But if $Z=(RcosTheta,RsinTheta)$ with $R$ uniform in $[0,r]$ and $Theta$ uniform on $[0,2pi]$, why $$mathbb P{|Z|leq x}=mathbb P{Rleq x,Thetain [0,2pi]}=mathbb P{Rleq x}=frac{x}{r}$$ is not true ? I really don't get this point
        $endgroup$
        – idm
        Nov 30 '18 at 9:41










      • $begingroup$
        the assumption that $R$ is uniform in $[0,r]$ is not valid.
        $endgroup$
        – Siong Thye Goh
        Nov 30 '18 at 9:45










      • $begingroup$
        ok, stange... thank you :)
        $endgroup$
        – idm
        Nov 30 '18 at 9:46
















      2












      $begingroup$

      $$F_X(x) = frac{pi x^2}{pi r^2}$$



      $$f_X(x)=frac{2x}{r^2}$$



      begin{align}
      E[r-X]&=r-E[X] \
      &=r - frac1{r^2}int_0^r 2x^2, dx\
      &= r - frac1{r^2}frac{2r^3}3\
      &= frac{r}{3}
      end{align}






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$













      • $begingroup$
        I don't get why $F_X(x)=frac{x^2}{r^2}$
        $endgroup$
        – idm
        Nov 30 '18 at 9:29










      • $begingroup$
        That is the meaning of uniform over an area, if you draw a circle of the same size on the target, it is equally likely to hit either of them.
        $endgroup$
        – Siong Thye Goh
        Nov 30 '18 at 9:30












      • $begingroup$
        Ok I see, thank you. But if $Z=(RcosTheta,RsinTheta)$ with $R$ uniform in $[0,r]$ and $Theta$ uniform on $[0,2pi]$, why $$mathbb P{|Z|leq x}=mathbb P{Rleq x,Thetain [0,2pi]}=mathbb P{Rleq x}=frac{x}{r}$$ is not true ? I really don't get this point
        $endgroup$
        – idm
        Nov 30 '18 at 9:41










      • $begingroup$
        the assumption that $R$ is uniform in $[0,r]$ is not valid.
        $endgroup$
        – Siong Thye Goh
        Nov 30 '18 at 9:45










      • $begingroup$
        ok, stange... thank you :)
        $endgroup$
        – idm
        Nov 30 '18 at 9:46














      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$

      $$F_X(x) = frac{pi x^2}{pi r^2}$$



      $$f_X(x)=frac{2x}{r^2}$$



      begin{align}
      E[r-X]&=r-E[X] \
      &=r - frac1{r^2}int_0^r 2x^2, dx\
      &= r - frac1{r^2}frac{2r^3}3\
      &= frac{r}{3}
      end{align}






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$



      $$F_X(x) = frac{pi x^2}{pi r^2}$$



      $$f_X(x)=frac{2x}{r^2}$$



      begin{align}
      E[r-X]&=r-E[X] \
      &=r - frac1{r^2}int_0^r 2x^2, dx\
      &= r - frac1{r^2}frac{2r^3}3\
      &= frac{r}{3}
      end{align}







      share|cite|improve this answer












      share|cite|improve this answer



      share|cite|improve this answer










      answered Nov 30 '18 at 9:25









      Siong Thye GohSiong Thye Goh

      100k1465117




      100k1465117












      • $begingroup$
        I don't get why $F_X(x)=frac{x^2}{r^2}$
        $endgroup$
        – idm
        Nov 30 '18 at 9:29










      • $begingroup$
        That is the meaning of uniform over an area, if you draw a circle of the same size on the target, it is equally likely to hit either of them.
        $endgroup$
        – Siong Thye Goh
        Nov 30 '18 at 9:30












      • $begingroup$
        Ok I see, thank you. But if $Z=(RcosTheta,RsinTheta)$ with $R$ uniform in $[0,r]$ and $Theta$ uniform on $[0,2pi]$, why $$mathbb P{|Z|leq x}=mathbb P{Rleq x,Thetain [0,2pi]}=mathbb P{Rleq x}=frac{x}{r}$$ is not true ? I really don't get this point
        $endgroup$
        – idm
        Nov 30 '18 at 9:41










      • $begingroup$
        the assumption that $R$ is uniform in $[0,r]$ is not valid.
        $endgroup$
        – Siong Thye Goh
        Nov 30 '18 at 9:45










      • $begingroup$
        ok, stange... thank you :)
        $endgroup$
        – idm
        Nov 30 '18 at 9:46


















      • $begingroup$
        I don't get why $F_X(x)=frac{x^2}{r^2}$
        $endgroup$
        – idm
        Nov 30 '18 at 9:29










      • $begingroup$
        That is the meaning of uniform over an area, if you draw a circle of the same size on the target, it is equally likely to hit either of them.
        $endgroup$
        – Siong Thye Goh
        Nov 30 '18 at 9:30












      • $begingroup$
        Ok I see, thank you. But if $Z=(RcosTheta,RsinTheta)$ with $R$ uniform in $[0,r]$ and $Theta$ uniform on $[0,2pi]$, why $$mathbb P{|Z|leq x}=mathbb P{Rleq x,Thetain [0,2pi]}=mathbb P{Rleq x}=frac{x}{r}$$ is not true ? I really don't get this point
        $endgroup$
        – idm
        Nov 30 '18 at 9:41










      • $begingroup$
        the assumption that $R$ is uniform in $[0,r]$ is not valid.
        $endgroup$
        – Siong Thye Goh
        Nov 30 '18 at 9:45










      • $begingroup$
        ok, stange... thank you :)
        $endgroup$
        – idm
        Nov 30 '18 at 9:46
















      $begingroup$
      I don't get why $F_X(x)=frac{x^2}{r^2}$
      $endgroup$
      – idm
      Nov 30 '18 at 9:29




      $begingroup$
      I don't get why $F_X(x)=frac{x^2}{r^2}$
      $endgroup$
      – idm
      Nov 30 '18 at 9:29












      $begingroup$
      That is the meaning of uniform over an area, if you draw a circle of the same size on the target, it is equally likely to hit either of them.
      $endgroup$
      – Siong Thye Goh
      Nov 30 '18 at 9:30






      $begingroup$
      That is the meaning of uniform over an area, if you draw a circle of the same size on the target, it is equally likely to hit either of them.
      $endgroup$
      – Siong Thye Goh
      Nov 30 '18 at 9:30














      $begingroup$
      Ok I see, thank you. But if $Z=(RcosTheta,RsinTheta)$ with $R$ uniform in $[0,r]$ and $Theta$ uniform on $[0,2pi]$, why $$mathbb P{|Z|leq x}=mathbb P{Rleq x,Thetain [0,2pi]}=mathbb P{Rleq x}=frac{x}{r}$$ is not true ? I really don't get this point
      $endgroup$
      – idm
      Nov 30 '18 at 9:41




      $begingroup$
      Ok I see, thank you. But if $Z=(RcosTheta,RsinTheta)$ with $R$ uniform in $[0,r]$ and $Theta$ uniform on $[0,2pi]$, why $$mathbb P{|Z|leq x}=mathbb P{Rleq x,Thetain [0,2pi]}=mathbb P{Rleq x}=frac{x}{r}$$ is not true ? I really don't get this point
      $endgroup$
      – idm
      Nov 30 '18 at 9:41












      $begingroup$
      the assumption that $R$ is uniform in $[0,r]$ is not valid.
      $endgroup$
      – Siong Thye Goh
      Nov 30 '18 at 9:45




      $begingroup$
      the assumption that $R$ is uniform in $[0,r]$ is not valid.
      $endgroup$
      – Siong Thye Goh
      Nov 30 '18 at 9:45












      $begingroup$
      ok, stange... thank you :)
      $endgroup$
      – idm
      Nov 30 '18 at 9:46




      $begingroup$
      ok, stange... thank you :)
      $endgroup$
      – idm
      Nov 30 '18 at 9:46











      1












      $begingroup$

      You may first construct the probability density as follows:




      • At distance $x$ from the center of the circle a corresponding annulus of "thickness" $dx$ has a probability weight of
        $$frac{1}{pi r^2}cdot 2pi cdot x cdot dx$$


      So, you get
      $$E(Y) = frac{1}{pi r^2} int_0^r (r-x)2pi cdot x; dx = cdots = frac{r}{3}$$






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        1












        $begingroup$

        You may first construct the probability density as follows:




        • At distance $x$ from the center of the circle a corresponding annulus of "thickness" $dx$ has a probability weight of
          $$frac{1}{pi r^2}cdot 2pi cdot x cdot dx$$


        So, you get
        $$E(Y) = frac{1}{pi r^2} int_0^r (r-x)2pi cdot x; dx = cdots = frac{r}{3}$$






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$
















          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          You may first construct the probability density as follows:




          • At distance $x$ from the center of the circle a corresponding annulus of "thickness" $dx$ has a probability weight of
            $$frac{1}{pi r^2}cdot 2pi cdot x cdot dx$$


          So, you get
          $$E(Y) = frac{1}{pi r^2} int_0^r (r-x)2pi cdot x; dx = cdots = frac{r}{3}$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          You may first construct the probability density as follows:




          • At distance $x$ from the center of the circle a corresponding annulus of "thickness" $dx$ has a probability weight of
            $$frac{1}{pi r^2}cdot 2pi cdot x cdot dx$$


          So, you get
          $$E(Y) = frac{1}{pi r^2} int_0^r (r-x)2pi cdot x; dx = cdots = frac{r}{3}$$







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Nov 30 '18 at 9:43









          trancelocationtrancelocation

          9,6801722




          9,6801722























              -1












              $begingroup$

              $$frac{int_0^r(r-x)x.dx}{int_0^r x.dx}$$



              This gives $r/3$.



              The problem with the integral you gave at first, is that the $(r-x)$ needs to be weighted by an $x.dx$, as this is the elemental area of the disc presented by a strip of thickness $dx$ at radius $x$ (or rather $2pi x.dx$ ... but then the $2pi$ appears on the top & bottom & obviously cancels ... or to put it another way, we could do the calculation for any sector of the disc & get the same result) - the catchment, if you like, at radius $x$.



              Basically you're calculating the mean value of $r-x$ over a sector of a disc, or over a whole disc - it makes no difference.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$


















                -1












                $begingroup$

                $$frac{int_0^r(r-x)x.dx}{int_0^r x.dx}$$



                This gives $r/3$.



                The problem with the integral you gave at first, is that the $(r-x)$ needs to be weighted by an $x.dx$, as this is the elemental area of the disc presented by a strip of thickness $dx$ at radius $x$ (or rather $2pi x.dx$ ... but then the $2pi$ appears on the top & bottom & obviously cancels ... or to put it another way, we could do the calculation for any sector of the disc & get the same result) - the catchment, if you like, at radius $x$.



                Basically you're calculating the mean value of $r-x$ over a sector of a disc, or over a whole disc - it makes no difference.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$
















                  -1












                  -1








                  -1





                  $begingroup$

                  $$frac{int_0^r(r-x)x.dx}{int_0^r x.dx}$$



                  This gives $r/3$.



                  The problem with the integral you gave at first, is that the $(r-x)$ needs to be weighted by an $x.dx$, as this is the elemental area of the disc presented by a strip of thickness $dx$ at radius $x$ (or rather $2pi x.dx$ ... but then the $2pi$ appears on the top & bottom & obviously cancels ... or to put it another way, we could do the calculation for any sector of the disc & get the same result) - the catchment, if you like, at radius $x$.



                  Basically you're calculating the mean value of $r-x$ over a sector of a disc, or over a whole disc - it makes no difference.






                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  $$frac{int_0^r(r-x)x.dx}{int_0^r x.dx}$$



                  This gives $r/3$.



                  The problem with the integral you gave at first, is that the $(r-x)$ needs to be weighted by an $x.dx$, as this is the elemental area of the disc presented by a strip of thickness $dx$ at radius $x$ (or rather $2pi x.dx$ ... but then the $2pi$ appears on the top & bottom & obviously cancels ... or to put it another way, we could do the calculation for any sector of the disc & get the same result) - the catchment, if you like, at radius $x$.



                  Basically you're calculating the mean value of $r-x$ over a sector of a disc, or over a whole disc - it makes no difference.







                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited Nov 30 '18 at 9:37

























                  answered Nov 30 '18 at 9:23









                  AmbretteOrriseyAmbretteOrrisey

                  55410




                  55410






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid …



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3019856%2fwhy-the-expectation-of-distance-to-center-of-disk-is-r-3-and-not-r-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      -

                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Quarter-circle Tiles

                      Image
                      up vote 0 down vote favorite I have $99$ identical square tiles, each with a quarter-circle drawn on it like this: [asy] size(1.5cm); draw(Arc((2,0),1,90,180),red+1); draw((0,0)--(2,0)--(2,2)--(0,2)--(0,0)); [/asy] When I arrange the tiles in a $9times 11$ rectangular grid, each with a random orientation, what is the expected value of the number of full circles I form? I think this problem has to do with finding the chance any given 2x2 square has a circle, but I can't find it. expected-value share | cite | improve this question asked Nov 20 at 15:03 6minecraftninja 1 2
                      Read more

                      build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

                      Image
                      0 I think it's similiar to NFAs. I replace the finite states of the given automaton for start-states for my new automaton. I do it with $epsilon$ -transition from the start state to the actual finite states of the given automaton. The start state of the given automaton will be my accepting(finite) state of my new one. All transitions will be reversed of course to recognize the reversed word. But how do I have to change the stack of the pushdown automaton? That's tricky. formal-languages automata context-free-grammar share | cite | improve this question edited Nov 29 '18 at 14:20 joee
                      Read more

                      Mont Emei

                      Image
                      Mont Emei.mw-parser-output .entete.map{background-image:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7a/Picto_infobox_map.png")} Vue du sommet Wanfo du mont Emei Géographie Altitude 3 099  m , Wanfo Coordonnées 29° 31′ 11″ nord, 103° 19′ 57″ est Administration Pays   Chine Province Sichuan Ville-préfecture Leshan Géolocalisation sur la carte : Sichuan Mont Emei Géolocalisation sur la carte : Chine Mont Emei modifier   Paysage panoramique du mont Emei, incluant le paysage panoramique du grand Bouddha de Leshan *   Patrimoine mondial de l'UNESCO Passerelle en bois sur le versant ouest Pays   Chine Subdivision Sichuan Type Mixte Critères (iv) (vi) (x) Superficie 15 400 ha Numéro d’identification 779 Zone géographique Asie et Pacifique  ** Année d’inscription 1996 (20 e session) * Descriptif officiel UNESCO ** Classification géog
                      Read more