$2n! geq (n-k)! n^{k-1} (2n+k-k^2)$











up vote
0
down vote

favorite
1













Let $0 < k leq n$ and $k$ is an integer. Then prove that :
$$2 cdot (n)! geq (n-k)! n^{k-1} (2n+k-k^2)$$




The main problem I found in trying to prove this inequality is the term : $2n+k-k^2$. It’s hard to really have a good bound on this polynomial that will help solving this inequality.



We can notice that we only need to look at the $k$ for which : $2n+k-k^2 > 0$. Yet trying to compute the determinant in order to find the root of the polynomial is a bit cumbersome.



Moreover it’s quite hard to have an analytic way of proving this since taking derivative is impossible here.
Maybe there is some convexity argument but I didn’t figure anything.










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 2




    Do you mean $(2n)!$ or $ 2 cdot (n!)$?
    – p4sch
    Nov 22 at 12:00










  • $2 cdot (n!)$. ,
    – Interesting problems
    Nov 22 at 12:25















up vote
0
down vote

favorite
1













Let $0 < k leq n$ and $k$ is an integer. Then prove that :
$$2 cdot (n)! geq (n-k)! n^{k-1} (2n+k-k^2)$$




The main problem I found in trying to prove this inequality is the term : $2n+k-k^2$. It’s hard to really have a good bound on this polynomial that will help solving this inequality.



We can notice that we only need to look at the $k$ for which : $2n+k-k^2 > 0$. Yet trying to compute the determinant in order to find the root of the polynomial is a bit cumbersome.



Moreover it’s quite hard to have an analytic way of proving this since taking derivative is impossible here.
Maybe there is some convexity argument but I didn’t figure anything.










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 2




    Do you mean $(2n)!$ or $ 2 cdot (n!)$?
    – p4sch
    Nov 22 at 12:00










  • $2 cdot (n!)$. ,
    – Interesting problems
    Nov 22 at 12:25













up vote
0
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
0
down vote

favorite
1






1






Let $0 < k leq n$ and $k$ is an integer. Then prove that :
$$2 cdot (n)! geq (n-k)! n^{k-1} (2n+k-k^2)$$




The main problem I found in trying to prove this inequality is the term : $2n+k-k^2$. It’s hard to really have a good bound on this polynomial that will help solving this inequality.



We can notice that we only need to look at the $k$ for which : $2n+k-k^2 > 0$. Yet trying to compute the determinant in order to find the root of the polynomial is a bit cumbersome.



Moreover it’s quite hard to have an analytic way of proving this since taking derivative is impossible here.
Maybe there is some convexity argument but I didn’t figure anything.










share|cite|improve this question
















Let $0 < k leq n$ and $k$ is an integer. Then prove that :
$$2 cdot (n)! geq (n-k)! n^{k-1} (2n+k-k^2)$$




The main problem I found in trying to prove this inequality is the term : $2n+k-k^2$. It’s hard to really have a good bound on this polynomial that will help solving this inequality.



We can notice that we only need to look at the $k$ for which : $2n+k-k^2 > 0$. Yet trying to compute the determinant in order to find the root of the polynomial is a bit cumbersome.



Moreover it’s quite hard to have an analytic way of proving this since taking derivative is impossible here.
Maybe there is some convexity argument but I didn’t figure anything.







calculus real-analysis sequences-and-series inequality






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 22 at 12:25

























asked Nov 22 at 10:59









Interesting problems

13310




13310








  • 2




    Do you mean $(2n)!$ or $ 2 cdot (n!)$?
    – p4sch
    Nov 22 at 12:00










  • $2 cdot (n!)$. ,
    – Interesting problems
    Nov 22 at 12:25














  • 2




    Do you mean $(2n)!$ or $ 2 cdot (n!)$?
    – p4sch
    Nov 22 at 12:00










  • $2 cdot (n!)$. ,
    – Interesting problems
    Nov 22 at 12:25








2




2




Do you mean $(2n)!$ or $ 2 cdot (n!)$?
– p4sch
Nov 22 at 12:00




Do you mean $(2n)!$ or $ 2 cdot (n!)$?
– p4sch
Nov 22 at 12:00












$2 cdot (n!)$. ,
– Interesting problems
Nov 22 at 12:25




$2 cdot (n!)$. ,
– Interesting problems
Nov 22 at 12:25










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
4
down vote



accepted










It's equivalent to demonstrating :
$$2prod_{m=0}^{k-1}(1-frac{m}{n})geqfrac{2n+k-k^2}{n}$$
By induction, you may prove the following inequality :
$$prod_{i=1}^{n}(1-alpha_{i})geq 1-sum_{i=1}^{n}alpha_{i}$$
where $alpha_{i}$ are positive. #in fact, we need $α_i∈[0,1]$. Thanks for the comment of "Thinking" below#



Applying this inequality, we obtain
$$2prod_{m=0}^{k-1}(1-frac{m}{n})geq 2(1-sum_{m=0}^{k-1}frac{m}{n}) = frac{2n+k-k^2}{n}$$.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • The inequality is true if $alpha_i in [0,1]$
    – Thinking
    Nov 22 at 16:12










  • We only need $alpha_i geq 0$ because $(1-a)(1-b) = 1-a-b+ab geq 1-a-b$.
    – 曾靖國
    Nov 22 at 16:15










  • No, since $n$ is not necessarily even. Take $ n = 3$ and $alpha_i = 4$. Then we have : $(-3)^3 = -27 < 1-3cdot = -11$
    – Thinking
    Nov 22 at 16:24










  • Yes, you are right. I didn't notice that. Thanks for your remark. I will add this in my post.
    – 曾靖國
    Nov 22 at 16:31






  • 1




    I already know the inequality of $prod_{i=1}^{n}(1-alpha_{i})$ because I had it as execise in high school. The probabilistic proof that you mention, I think we can consider $n$ events $A_{i}$ whose probability is $alpha_{i}$. Then using something like $Card(A_{1}cupcdotscup A_{n})leq sum A_{i}$. So maybe the original problem has also some probabilistic interpretation.
    – 曾靖國
    Nov 22 at 16:47




















up vote
3
down vote













Here is a probabilistic way of proving the inequality.



As @曾靖國 noticed we have :



$$2 left ( 1 - sum_{m=0}^{k-1} frac{m}{n} right) = frac{2n+k-k^2}{n}$$



and thus the inequality we want to prove can be rewritten as :



$$2 prod_{m = 0}^{k-1} left ( 1- frac{m}{n} right ) geq 2 left ( 1 - sum_{m=0}^{k-1} frac{m}{n} right) $$



Now let's consider indepent events : $A_0, ..., A_{k-1}$ and a probability $mathbb{P}$ such that :
$$mathbb{P} left ( A_i right) = frac{i}{n}$$



Hence we have (since the $bar{A_i}$ are independent) :



$$mathbb{P} left ( bigcap_{i = 0}^{k-1} bar{A_i} right) = prod_{m = 0}^{k-1} left ( 1- frac{m}{n} right )$$



Thus :



$$mathbb{P} left ( overline{bigcap_{i = 0}^{k-1} bar{A_i}} right) = mathbb{P} left ( bigcup_{ i = 0}^{k-1} A_i right) leq sum_{i = 0}^{k-1} mathbb{P} left ( A_i right ) = sum_{m = 0}^{k-1} frac{m}{n} $$



Since :



$$mathbb{P} left ( overline{bigcap_{i = 0}^{k-1} bar{A_i}} right) = 1 - mathbb{P} left ( bigcap_{i = 0}^{k-1} bar{A_i} right)$$



We have the desired inequality :



$$2 prod_{m = 0}^{k-1} left ( 1- frac{m}{n} right ) geq 2 left ( 1 - sum_{m=0}^{k-1} frac{m}{n} right) $$



Using the same probabilistic argument (or simply using induction as suggest by @曾靖國) , we can prove more generally that if : $alpha_i in [0,1]$ then :



$$prod_{i = 1}^n left (1-alpha_i right ) geq 1 - sum_{i = 1}^n alpha_i$$






share|cite|improve this answer




























    up vote
    1
    down vote













    $$
    begin{align}
    frac{n!}{(n-k)!,n^k}
    &=prod_{j=0}^{k-1}left(1-frac jnright)^{-1}\
    &geprod_{j=0}^{k-1}left(1+frac jnright)\
    &ge1+sum_{j=0}^{k-1}frac jn\
    &=1+frac{k^2-k}{2n}
    end{align}
    $$

    Thus, the inequality in the question should probably be the stronger
    $$
    2n! geq (n-k)! n^{k-1} (2n-k+k^2)
    $$






    share|cite|improve this answer





















      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3009004%2f2n-geq-n-k-nk-1-2nk-k2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      4
      down vote



      accepted










      It's equivalent to demonstrating :
      $$2prod_{m=0}^{k-1}(1-frac{m}{n})geqfrac{2n+k-k^2}{n}$$
      By induction, you may prove the following inequality :
      $$prod_{i=1}^{n}(1-alpha_{i})geq 1-sum_{i=1}^{n}alpha_{i}$$
      where $alpha_{i}$ are positive. #in fact, we need $α_i∈[0,1]$. Thanks for the comment of "Thinking" below#



      Applying this inequality, we obtain
      $$2prod_{m=0}^{k-1}(1-frac{m}{n})geq 2(1-sum_{m=0}^{k-1}frac{m}{n}) = frac{2n+k-k^2}{n}$$.






      share|cite|improve this answer























      • The inequality is true if $alpha_i in [0,1]$
        – Thinking
        Nov 22 at 16:12










      • We only need $alpha_i geq 0$ because $(1-a)(1-b) = 1-a-b+ab geq 1-a-b$.
        – 曾靖國
        Nov 22 at 16:15










      • No, since $n$ is not necessarily even. Take $ n = 3$ and $alpha_i = 4$. Then we have : $(-3)^3 = -27 < 1-3cdot = -11$
        – Thinking
        Nov 22 at 16:24










      • Yes, you are right. I didn't notice that. Thanks for your remark. I will add this in my post.
        – 曾靖國
        Nov 22 at 16:31






      • 1




        I already know the inequality of $prod_{i=1}^{n}(1-alpha_{i})$ because I had it as execise in high school. The probabilistic proof that you mention, I think we can consider $n$ events $A_{i}$ whose probability is $alpha_{i}$. Then using something like $Card(A_{1}cupcdotscup A_{n})leq sum A_{i}$. So maybe the original problem has also some probabilistic interpretation.
        – 曾靖國
        Nov 22 at 16:47

















      up vote
      4
      down vote



      accepted










      It's equivalent to demonstrating :
      $$2prod_{m=0}^{k-1}(1-frac{m}{n})geqfrac{2n+k-k^2}{n}$$
      By induction, you may prove the following inequality :
      $$prod_{i=1}^{n}(1-alpha_{i})geq 1-sum_{i=1}^{n}alpha_{i}$$
      where $alpha_{i}$ are positive. #in fact, we need $α_i∈[0,1]$. Thanks for the comment of "Thinking" below#



      Applying this inequality, we obtain
      $$2prod_{m=0}^{k-1}(1-frac{m}{n})geq 2(1-sum_{m=0}^{k-1}frac{m}{n}) = frac{2n+k-k^2}{n}$$.






      share|cite|improve this answer























      • The inequality is true if $alpha_i in [0,1]$
        – Thinking
        Nov 22 at 16:12










      • We only need $alpha_i geq 0$ because $(1-a)(1-b) = 1-a-b+ab geq 1-a-b$.
        – 曾靖國
        Nov 22 at 16:15










      • No, since $n$ is not necessarily even. Take $ n = 3$ and $alpha_i = 4$. Then we have : $(-3)^3 = -27 < 1-3cdot = -11$
        – Thinking
        Nov 22 at 16:24










      • Yes, you are right. I didn't notice that. Thanks for your remark. I will add this in my post.
        – 曾靖國
        Nov 22 at 16:31






      • 1




        I already know the inequality of $prod_{i=1}^{n}(1-alpha_{i})$ because I had it as execise in high school. The probabilistic proof that you mention, I think we can consider $n$ events $A_{i}$ whose probability is $alpha_{i}$. Then using something like $Card(A_{1}cupcdotscup A_{n})leq sum A_{i}$. So maybe the original problem has also some probabilistic interpretation.
        – 曾靖國
        Nov 22 at 16:47















      up vote
      4
      down vote



      accepted







      up vote
      4
      down vote



      accepted






      It's equivalent to demonstrating :
      $$2prod_{m=0}^{k-1}(1-frac{m}{n})geqfrac{2n+k-k^2}{n}$$
      By induction, you may prove the following inequality :
      $$prod_{i=1}^{n}(1-alpha_{i})geq 1-sum_{i=1}^{n}alpha_{i}$$
      where $alpha_{i}$ are positive. #in fact, we need $α_i∈[0,1]$. Thanks for the comment of "Thinking" below#



      Applying this inequality, we obtain
      $$2prod_{m=0}^{k-1}(1-frac{m}{n})geq 2(1-sum_{m=0}^{k-1}frac{m}{n}) = frac{2n+k-k^2}{n}$$.






      share|cite|improve this answer














      It's equivalent to demonstrating :
      $$2prod_{m=0}^{k-1}(1-frac{m}{n})geqfrac{2n+k-k^2}{n}$$
      By induction, you may prove the following inequality :
      $$prod_{i=1}^{n}(1-alpha_{i})geq 1-sum_{i=1}^{n}alpha_{i}$$
      where $alpha_{i}$ are positive. #in fact, we need $α_i∈[0,1]$. Thanks for the comment of "Thinking" below#



      Applying this inequality, we obtain
      $$2prod_{m=0}^{k-1}(1-frac{m}{n})geq 2(1-sum_{m=0}^{k-1}frac{m}{n}) = frac{2n+k-k^2}{n}$$.







      share|cite|improve this answer














      share|cite|improve this answer



      share|cite|improve this answer








      edited Nov 22 at 16:34

























      answered Nov 22 at 13:43









      曾靖國

      3868




      3868












      • The inequality is true if $alpha_i in [0,1]$
        – Thinking
        Nov 22 at 16:12










      • We only need $alpha_i geq 0$ because $(1-a)(1-b) = 1-a-b+ab geq 1-a-b$.
        – 曾靖國
        Nov 22 at 16:15










      • No, since $n$ is not necessarily even. Take $ n = 3$ and $alpha_i = 4$. Then we have : $(-3)^3 = -27 < 1-3cdot = -11$
        – Thinking
        Nov 22 at 16:24










      • Yes, you are right. I didn't notice that. Thanks for your remark. I will add this in my post.
        – 曾靖國
        Nov 22 at 16:31






      • 1




        I already know the inequality of $prod_{i=1}^{n}(1-alpha_{i})$ because I had it as execise in high school. The probabilistic proof that you mention, I think we can consider $n$ events $A_{i}$ whose probability is $alpha_{i}$. Then using something like $Card(A_{1}cupcdotscup A_{n})leq sum A_{i}$. So maybe the original problem has also some probabilistic interpretation.
        – 曾靖國
        Nov 22 at 16:47




















      • The inequality is true if $alpha_i in [0,1]$
        – Thinking
        Nov 22 at 16:12










      • We only need $alpha_i geq 0$ because $(1-a)(1-b) = 1-a-b+ab geq 1-a-b$.
        – 曾靖國
        Nov 22 at 16:15










      • No, since $n$ is not necessarily even. Take $ n = 3$ and $alpha_i = 4$. Then we have : $(-3)^3 = -27 < 1-3cdot = -11$
        – Thinking
        Nov 22 at 16:24










      • Yes, you are right. I didn't notice that. Thanks for your remark. I will add this in my post.
        – 曾靖國
        Nov 22 at 16:31






      • 1




        I already know the inequality of $prod_{i=1}^{n}(1-alpha_{i})$ because I had it as execise in high school. The probabilistic proof that you mention, I think we can consider $n$ events $A_{i}$ whose probability is $alpha_{i}$. Then using something like $Card(A_{1}cupcdotscup A_{n})leq sum A_{i}$. So maybe the original problem has also some probabilistic interpretation.
        – 曾靖國
        Nov 22 at 16:47


















      The inequality is true if $alpha_i in [0,1]$
      – Thinking
      Nov 22 at 16:12




      The inequality is true if $alpha_i in [0,1]$
      – Thinking
      Nov 22 at 16:12












      We only need $alpha_i geq 0$ because $(1-a)(1-b) = 1-a-b+ab geq 1-a-b$.
      – 曾靖國
      Nov 22 at 16:15




      We only need $alpha_i geq 0$ because $(1-a)(1-b) = 1-a-b+ab geq 1-a-b$.
      – 曾靖國
      Nov 22 at 16:15












      No, since $n$ is not necessarily even. Take $ n = 3$ and $alpha_i = 4$. Then we have : $(-3)^3 = -27 < 1-3cdot = -11$
      – Thinking
      Nov 22 at 16:24




      No, since $n$ is not necessarily even. Take $ n = 3$ and $alpha_i = 4$. Then we have : $(-3)^3 = -27 < 1-3cdot = -11$
      – Thinking
      Nov 22 at 16:24












      Yes, you are right. I didn't notice that. Thanks for your remark. I will add this in my post.
      – 曾靖國
      Nov 22 at 16:31




      Yes, you are right. I didn't notice that. Thanks for your remark. I will add this in my post.
      – 曾靖國
      Nov 22 at 16:31




      1




      1




      I already know the inequality of $prod_{i=1}^{n}(1-alpha_{i})$ because I had it as execise in high school. The probabilistic proof that you mention, I think we can consider $n$ events $A_{i}$ whose probability is $alpha_{i}$. Then using something like $Card(A_{1}cupcdotscup A_{n})leq sum A_{i}$. So maybe the original problem has also some probabilistic interpretation.
      – 曾靖國
      Nov 22 at 16:47






      I already know the inequality of $prod_{i=1}^{n}(1-alpha_{i})$ because I had it as execise in high school. The probabilistic proof that you mention, I think we can consider $n$ events $A_{i}$ whose probability is $alpha_{i}$. Then using something like $Card(A_{1}cupcdotscup A_{n})leq sum A_{i}$. So maybe the original problem has also some probabilistic interpretation.
      – 曾靖國
      Nov 22 at 16:47












      up vote
      3
      down vote













      Here is a probabilistic way of proving the inequality.



      As @曾靖國 noticed we have :



      $$2 left ( 1 - sum_{m=0}^{k-1} frac{m}{n} right) = frac{2n+k-k^2}{n}$$



      and thus the inequality we want to prove can be rewritten as :



      $$2 prod_{m = 0}^{k-1} left ( 1- frac{m}{n} right ) geq 2 left ( 1 - sum_{m=0}^{k-1} frac{m}{n} right) $$



      Now let's consider indepent events : $A_0, ..., A_{k-1}$ and a probability $mathbb{P}$ such that :
      $$mathbb{P} left ( A_i right) = frac{i}{n}$$



      Hence we have (since the $bar{A_i}$ are independent) :



      $$mathbb{P} left ( bigcap_{i = 0}^{k-1} bar{A_i} right) = prod_{m = 0}^{k-1} left ( 1- frac{m}{n} right )$$



      Thus :



      $$mathbb{P} left ( overline{bigcap_{i = 0}^{k-1} bar{A_i}} right) = mathbb{P} left ( bigcup_{ i = 0}^{k-1} A_i right) leq sum_{i = 0}^{k-1} mathbb{P} left ( A_i right ) = sum_{m = 0}^{k-1} frac{m}{n} $$



      Since :



      $$mathbb{P} left ( overline{bigcap_{i = 0}^{k-1} bar{A_i}} right) = 1 - mathbb{P} left ( bigcap_{i = 0}^{k-1} bar{A_i} right)$$



      We have the desired inequality :



      $$2 prod_{m = 0}^{k-1} left ( 1- frac{m}{n} right ) geq 2 left ( 1 - sum_{m=0}^{k-1} frac{m}{n} right) $$



      Using the same probabilistic argument (or simply using induction as suggest by @曾靖國) , we can prove more generally that if : $alpha_i in [0,1]$ then :



      $$prod_{i = 1}^n left (1-alpha_i right ) geq 1 - sum_{i = 1}^n alpha_i$$






      share|cite|improve this answer

























        up vote
        3
        down vote













        Here is a probabilistic way of proving the inequality.



        As @曾靖國 noticed we have :



        $$2 left ( 1 - sum_{m=0}^{k-1} frac{m}{n} right) = frac{2n+k-k^2}{n}$$



        and thus the inequality we want to prove can be rewritten as :



        $$2 prod_{m = 0}^{k-1} left ( 1- frac{m}{n} right ) geq 2 left ( 1 - sum_{m=0}^{k-1} frac{m}{n} right) $$



        Now let's consider indepent events : $A_0, ..., A_{k-1}$ and a probability $mathbb{P}$ such that :
        $$mathbb{P} left ( A_i right) = frac{i}{n}$$



        Hence we have (since the $bar{A_i}$ are independent) :



        $$mathbb{P} left ( bigcap_{i = 0}^{k-1} bar{A_i} right) = prod_{m = 0}^{k-1} left ( 1- frac{m}{n} right )$$



        Thus :



        $$mathbb{P} left ( overline{bigcap_{i = 0}^{k-1} bar{A_i}} right) = mathbb{P} left ( bigcup_{ i = 0}^{k-1} A_i right) leq sum_{i = 0}^{k-1} mathbb{P} left ( A_i right ) = sum_{m = 0}^{k-1} frac{m}{n} $$



        Since :



        $$mathbb{P} left ( overline{bigcap_{i = 0}^{k-1} bar{A_i}} right) = 1 - mathbb{P} left ( bigcap_{i = 0}^{k-1} bar{A_i} right)$$



        We have the desired inequality :



        $$2 prod_{m = 0}^{k-1} left ( 1- frac{m}{n} right ) geq 2 left ( 1 - sum_{m=0}^{k-1} frac{m}{n} right) $$



        Using the same probabilistic argument (or simply using induction as suggest by @曾靖國) , we can prove more generally that if : $alpha_i in [0,1]$ then :



        $$prod_{i = 1}^n left (1-alpha_i right ) geq 1 - sum_{i = 1}^n alpha_i$$






        share|cite|improve this answer























          up vote
          3
          down vote










          up vote
          3
          down vote









          Here is a probabilistic way of proving the inequality.



          As @曾靖國 noticed we have :



          $$2 left ( 1 - sum_{m=0}^{k-1} frac{m}{n} right) = frac{2n+k-k^2}{n}$$



          and thus the inequality we want to prove can be rewritten as :



          $$2 prod_{m = 0}^{k-1} left ( 1- frac{m}{n} right ) geq 2 left ( 1 - sum_{m=0}^{k-1} frac{m}{n} right) $$



          Now let's consider indepent events : $A_0, ..., A_{k-1}$ and a probability $mathbb{P}$ such that :
          $$mathbb{P} left ( A_i right) = frac{i}{n}$$



          Hence we have (since the $bar{A_i}$ are independent) :



          $$mathbb{P} left ( bigcap_{i = 0}^{k-1} bar{A_i} right) = prod_{m = 0}^{k-1} left ( 1- frac{m}{n} right )$$



          Thus :



          $$mathbb{P} left ( overline{bigcap_{i = 0}^{k-1} bar{A_i}} right) = mathbb{P} left ( bigcup_{ i = 0}^{k-1} A_i right) leq sum_{i = 0}^{k-1} mathbb{P} left ( A_i right ) = sum_{m = 0}^{k-1} frac{m}{n} $$



          Since :



          $$mathbb{P} left ( overline{bigcap_{i = 0}^{k-1} bar{A_i}} right) = 1 - mathbb{P} left ( bigcap_{i = 0}^{k-1} bar{A_i} right)$$



          We have the desired inequality :



          $$2 prod_{m = 0}^{k-1} left ( 1- frac{m}{n} right ) geq 2 left ( 1 - sum_{m=0}^{k-1} frac{m}{n} right) $$



          Using the same probabilistic argument (or simply using induction as suggest by @曾靖國) , we can prove more generally that if : $alpha_i in [0,1]$ then :



          $$prod_{i = 1}^n left (1-alpha_i right ) geq 1 - sum_{i = 1}^n alpha_i$$






          share|cite|improve this answer












          Here is a probabilistic way of proving the inequality.



          As @曾靖國 noticed we have :



          $$2 left ( 1 - sum_{m=0}^{k-1} frac{m}{n} right) = frac{2n+k-k^2}{n}$$



          and thus the inequality we want to prove can be rewritten as :



          $$2 prod_{m = 0}^{k-1} left ( 1- frac{m}{n} right ) geq 2 left ( 1 - sum_{m=0}^{k-1} frac{m}{n} right) $$



          Now let's consider indepent events : $A_0, ..., A_{k-1}$ and a probability $mathbb{P}$ such that :
          $$mathbb{P} left ( A_i right) = frac{i}{n}$$



          Hence we have (since the $bar{A_i}$ are independent) :



          $$mathbb{P} left ( bigcap_{i = 0}^{k-1} bar{A_i} right) = prod_{m = 0}^{k-1} left ( 1- frac{m}{n} right )$$



          Thus :



          $$mathbb{P} left ( overline{bigcap_{i = 0}^{k-1} bar{A_i}} right) = mathbb{P} left ( bigcup_{ i = 0}^{k-1} A_i right) leq sum_{i = 0}^{k-1} mathbb{P} left ( A_i right ) = sum_{m = 0}^{k-1} frac{m}{n} $$



          Since :



          $$mathbb{P} left ( overline{bigcap_{i = 0}^{k-1} bar{A_i}} right) = 1 - mathbb{P} left ( bigcap_{i = 0}^{k-1} bar{A_i} right)$$



          We have the desired inequality :



          $$2 prod_{m = 0}^{k-1} left ( 1- frac{m}{n} right ) geq 2 left ( 1 - sum_{m=0}^{k-1} frac{m}{n} right) $$



          Using the same probabilistic argument (or simply using induction as suggest by @曾靖國) , we can prove more generally that if : $alpha_i in [0,1]$ then :



          $$prod_{i = 1}^n left (1-alpha_i right ) geq 1 - sum_{i = 1}^n alpha_i$$







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Nov 22 at 17:16









          Thinking

          91916




          91916






















              up vote
              1
              down vote













              $$
              begin{align}
              frac{n!}{(n-k)!,n^k}
              &=prod_{j=0}^{k-1}left(1-frac jnright)^{-1}\
              &geprod_{j=0}^{k-1}left(1+frac jnright)\
              &ge1+sum_{j=0}^{k-1}frac jn\
              &=1+frac{k^2-k}{2n}
              end{align}
              $$

              Thus, the inequality in the question should probably be the stronger
              $$
              2n! geq (n-k)! n^{k-1} (2n-k+k^2)
              $$






              share|cite|improve this answer

























                up vote
                1
                down vote













                $$
                begin{align}
                frac{n!}{(n-k)!,n^k}
                &=prod_{j=0}^{k-1}left(1-frac jnright)^{-1}\
                &geprod_{j=0}^{k-1}left(1+frac jnright)\
                &ge1+sum_{j=0}^{k-1}frac jn\
                &=1+frac{k^2-k}{2n}
                end{align}
                $$

                Thus, the inequality in the question should probably be the stronger
                $$
                2n! geq (n-k)! n^{k-1} (2n-k+k^2)
                $$






                share|cite|improve this answer























                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote









                  $$
                  begin{align}
                  frac{n!}{(n-k)!,n^k}
                  &=prod_{j=0}^{k-1}left(1-frac jnright)^{-1}\
                  &geprod_{j=0}^{k-1}left(1+frac jnright)\
                  &ge1+sum_{j=0}^{k-1}frac jn\
                  &=1+frac{k^2-k}{2n}
                  end{align}
                  $$

                  Thus, the inequality in the question should probably be the stronger
                  $$
                  2n! geq (n-k)! n^{k-1} (2n-k+k^2)
                  $$






                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  $$
                  begin{align}
                  frac{n!}{(n-k)!,n^k}
                  &=prod_{j=0}^{k-1}left(1-frac jnright)^{-1}\
                  &geprod_{j=0}^{k-1}left(1+frac jnright)\
                  &ge1+sum_{j=0}^{k-1}frac jn\
                  &=1+frac{k^2-k}{2n}
                  end{align}
                  $$

                  Thus, the inequality in the question should probably be the stronger
                  $$
                  2n! geq (n-k)! n^{k-1} (2n-k+k^2)
                  $$







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Nov 22 at 18:00









                  robjohn

                  263k27302623




                  263k27302623






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                      Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                      Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3009004%2f2n-geq-n-k-nk-1-2nk-k2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Ellipse (mathématiques)

                      Quarter-circle Tiles

                      Mont Emei