When are quotients of homeomorphic spaces homeomorphic?











up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1












Let $X$ and $Y$ be homeomorphic topological spaces, connected by the homeomorphism $f : X rightarrow Y$. Let $sim$ be an equivalence relation on $X$ and $approx$ be an equivalence relation on $Y$.



I would think that there would be some structure that I could place on the equivalence relations $sim$ and $approx$ that would allow me to construct, using the homeomorphism $f$, a homeomorphism $bar{f}$ from $X/sim$ to $Y/approx$. I suspect that that relationship is $a sim b leftrightarrow f(a) approx f(b), forall a, b in X$.



That is, I suspect that "equivalent" quotients of homeomorphic spaces are homeomorphic, but I don't know exactly how to formulate this or prove it.



(This result, by the way, to me, seems to hinge on the existence of a "reverse" universal quotient property: juts as functions $f : X/sim rightarrow Y$ correspond uniquely to a subset of functions $f : X rightarrow Y$, I suspect that functions $f : X rightarrow Y/approx$ correspond uniquely to some subset of functions $f : X rightarrow Y$, but I don't know how this works either.)










share|cite|improve this question






















  • There is no such "reverse universal property". For instance you have many maps $S^1to S^1$ that don't factor through the quotient map $mathbb{R}to S^1$
    – Max
    5 hours ago










  • Hmm, interesting. Is there a familiar subset of maps that do factor through in this fashion? I wonder if the question I'm asking here is best answered topologically or categorically.
    – Billy Smith
    3 hours ago












  • In the specific case of $mathbb{R}to S^1$ the maps $Xto S^1$ that factor through it are precisely the nullhomotopic maps if $X$ is connected and locally path-connected. I don't know if there's a criterion for general quotient maps, but I don't think there is.
    – Max
    3 hours ago















up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1












Let $X$ and $Y$ be homeomorphic topological spaces, connected by the homeomorphism $f : X rightarrow Y$. Let $sim$ be an equivalence relation on $X$ and $approx$ be an equivalence relation on $Y$.



I would think that there would be some structure that I could place on the equivalence relations $sim$ and $approx$ that would allow me to construct, using the homeomorphism $f$, a homeomorphism $bar{f}$ from $X/sim$ to $Y/approx$. I suspect that that relationship is $a sim b leftrightarrow f(a) approx f(b), forall a, b in X$.



That is, I suspect that "equivalent" quotients of homeomorphic spaces are homeomorphic, but I don't know exactly how to formulate this or prove it.



(This result, by the way, to me, seems to hinge on the existence of a "reverse" universal quotient property: juts as functions $f : X/sim rightarrow Y$ correspond uniquely to a subset of functions $f : X rightarrow Y$, I suspect that functions $f : X rightarrow Y/approx$ correspond uniquely to some subset of functions $f : X rightarrow Y$, but I don't know how this works either.)










share|cite|improve this question






















  • There is no such "reverse universal property". For instance you have many maps $S^1to S^1$ that don't factor through the quotient map $mathbb{R}to S^1$
    – Max
    5 hours ago










  • Hmm, interesting. Is there a familiar subset of maps that do factor through in this fashion? I wonder if the question I'm asking here is best answered topologically or categorically.
    – Billy Smith
    3 hours ago












  • In the specific case of $mathbb{R}to S^1$ the maps $Xto S^1$ that factor through it are precisely the nullhomotopic maps if $X$ is connected and locally path-connected. I don't know if there's a criterion for general quotient maps, but I don't think there is.
    – Max
    3 hours ago













up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1






1





Let $X$ and $Y$ be homeomorphic topological spaces, connected by the homeomorphism $f : X rightarrow Y$. Let $sim$ be an equivalence relation on $X$ and $approx$ be an equivalence relation on $Y$.



I would think that there would be some structure that I could place on the equivalence relations $sim$ and $approx$ that would allow me to construct, using the homeomorphism $f$, a homeomorphism $bar{f}$ from $X/sim$ to $Y/approx$. I suspect that that relationship is $a sim b leftrightarrow f(a) approx f(b), forall a, b in X$.



That is, I suspect that "equivalent" quotients of homeomorphic spaces are homeomorphic, but I don't know exactly how to formulate this or prove it.



(This result, by the way, to me, seems to hinge on the existence of a "reverse" universal quotient property: juts as functions $f : X/sim rightarrow Y$ correspond uniquely to a subset of functions $f : X rightarrow Y$, I suspect that functions $f : X rightarrow Y/approx$ correspond uniquely to some subset of functions $f : X rightarrow Y$, but I don't know how this works either.)










share|cite|improve this question













Let $X$ and $Y$ be homeomorphic topological spaces, connected by the homeomorphism $f : X rightarrow Y$. Let $sim$ be an equivalence relation on $X$ and $approx$ be an equivalence relation on $Y$.



I would think that there would be some structure that I could place on the equivalence relations $sim$ and $approx$ that would allow me to construct, using the homeomorphism $f$, a homeomorphism $bar{f}$ from $X/sim$ to $Y/approx$. I suspect that that relationship is $a sim b leftrightarrow f(a) approx f(b), forall a, b in X$.



That is, I suspect that "equivalent" quotients of homeomorphic spaces are homeomorphic, but I don't know exactly how to formulate this or prove it.



(This result, by the way, to me, seems to hinge on the existence of a "reverse" universal quotient property: juts as functions $f : X/sim rightarrow Y$ correspond uniquely to a subset of functions $f : X rightarrow Y$, I suspect that functions $f : X rightarrow Y/approx$ correspond uniquely to some subset of functions $f : X rightarrow Y$, but I don't know how this works either.)







general-topology category-theory






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 6 hours ago









Billy Smith

635




635












  • There is no such "reverse universal property". For instance you have many maps $S^1to S^1$ that don't factor through the quotient map $mathbb{R}to S^1$
    – Max
    5 hours ago










  • Hmm, interesting. Is there a familiar subset of maps that do factor through in this fashion? I wonder if the question I'm asking here is best answered topologically or categorically.
    – Billy Smith
    3 hours ago












  • In the specific case of $mathbb{R}to S^1$ the maps $Xto S^1$ that factor through it are precisely the nullhomotopic maps if $X$ is connected and locally path-connected. I don't know if there's a criterion for general quotient maps, but I don't think there is.
    – Max
    3 hours ago


















  • There is no such "reverse universal property". For instance you have many maps $S^1to S^1$ that don't factor through the quotient map $mathbb{R}to S^1$
    – Max
    5 hours ago










  • Hmm, interesting. Is there a familiar subset of maps that do factor through in this fashion? I wonder if the question I'm asking here is best answered topologically or categorically.
    – Billy Smith
    3 hours ago












  • In the specific case of $mathbb{R}to S^1$ the maps $Xto S^1$ that factor through it are precisely the nullhomotopic maps if $X$ is connected and locally path-connected. I don't know if there's a criterion for general quotient maps, but I don't think there is.
    – Max
    3 hours ago
















There is no such "reverse universal property". For instance you have many maps $S^1to S^1$ that don't factor through the quotient map $mathbb{R}to S^1$
– Max
5 hours ago




There is no such "reverse universal property". For instance you have many maps $S^1to S^1$ that don't factor through the quotient map $mathbb{R}to S^1$
– Max
5 hours ago












Hmm, interesting. Is there a familiar subset of maps that do factor through in this fashion? I wonder if the question I'm asking here is best answered topologically or categorically.
– Billy Smith
3 hours ago






Hmm, interesting. Is there a familiar subset of maps that do factor through in this fashion? I wonder if the question I'm asking here is best answered topologically or categorically.
– Billy Smith
3 hours ago














In the specific case of $mathbb{R}to S^1$ the maps $Xto S^1$ that factor through it are precisely the nullhomotopic maps if $X$ is connected and locally path-connected. I don't know if there's a criterion for general quotient maps, but I don't think there is.
– Max
3 hours ago




In the specific case of $mathbb{R}to S^1$ the maps $Xto S^1$ that factor through it are precisely the nullhomotopic maps if $X$ is connected and locally path-connected. I don't know if there's a criterion for general quotient maps, but I don't think there is.
– Max
3 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
4
down vote













Your suspicion is correct. If $X$ and $Y$ are topological spaces with equivalence relations $sim$ and $approx$ and $f:Xto Y$ is a homeomorphism such that $xsim y$ if and only if $f(x)approx f(y)$, then $f$ passes to the quotient as $X/_sim cong Y/_approx$.



Proof goes roughly like this: define $widetilde{f}([x]_sim)doteq [f(x)]_approx$. We have that $widetilde{f}$ is well-defined and injective because of the condition relating $sim$ and $approx$, while surjectivity follows from the surjectivity of $f$. Continuity of $widetilde{f}$ and $widetilde{f}^{-1}$ follow from the universal property of the quotient topologies applied to the relations $widetilde{f}circpi_{sim}=pi_{approx}circ f$ and $widetilde{f}^{-1}circ pi_{approx}=pi_simcirc f^{-1}$ with the continuity of $f$ and $f^{-1}$.






share|cite|improve this answer




























    up vote
    3
    down vote













    I think you are correct. Here is a sketch of the argument:



    $phi:=pi_Ycirc f$ is a continuous surjection: $Xto Y/approx$ and it induces a bijection: $X^*=left { phi^{-1}([y]): [y]in Y/approx right }overset{overlinephi}{rightarrow} Y/approx , $ which is a homeomorphism if and only if $phi$ is a quotient map.



    As $phi $ is indeed a quotient map, the induced map is a homeomorphism. So, $X/sim$ and $Y/approx$ will be homoeomorphic if and only if $X^*$ and $X/sim$ are.



    This means that the map $[x]mapsto f^{-1}circ pi^{-1}_Y([y])$ must be a homeomorphism. That is, $f([x])mapsto pi^{-1}_Y([y])$ must be a homeomorphism.



    But the above map is well-defined if and only if $xsim x'Rightarrow f(x)approx f(x'),$ and in this case, it is obviously continuous, and it should be easy to check that it is bijective with continuous inverse.






    share|cite|improve this answer























      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3041546%2fwhen-are-quotients-of-homeomorphic-spaces-homeomorphic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      4
      down vote













      Your suspicion is correct. If $X$ and $Y$ are topological spaces with equivalence relations $sim$ and $approx$ and $f:Xto Y$ is a homeomorphism such that $xsim y$ if and only if $f(x)approx f(y)$, then $f$ passes to the quotient as $X/_sim cong Y/_approx$.



      Proof goes roughly like this: define $widetilde{f}([x]_sim)doteq [f(x)]_approx$. We have that $widetilde{f}$ is well-defined and injective because of the condition relating $sim$ and $approx$, while surjectivity follows from the surjectivity of $f$. Continuity of $widetilde{f}$ and $widetilde{f}^{-1}$ follow from the universal property of the quotient topologies applied to the relations $widetilde{f}circpi_{sim}=pi_{approx}circ f$ and $widetilde{f}^{-1}circ pi_{approx}=pi_simcirc f^{-1}$ with the continuity of $f$ and $f^{-1}$.






      share|cite|improve this answer

























        up vote
        4
        down vote













        Your suspicion is correct. If $X$ and $Y$ are topological spaces with equivalence relations $sim$ and $approx$ and $f:Xto Y$ is a homeomorphism such that $xsim y$ if and only if $f(x)approx f(y)$, then $f$ passes to the quotient as $X/_sim cong Y/_approx$.



        Proof goes roughly like this: define $widetilde{f}([x]_sim)doteq [f(x)]_approx$. We have that $widetilde{f}$ is well-defined and injective because of the condition relating $sim$ and $approx$, while surjectivity follows from the surjectivity of $f$. Continuity of $widetilde{f}$ and $widetilde{f}^{-1}$ follow from the universal property of the quotient topologies applied to the relations $widetilde{f}circpi_{sim}=pi_{approx}circ f$ and $widetilde{f}^{-1}circ pi_{approx}=pi_simcirc f^{-1}$ with the continuity of $f$ and $f^{-1}$.






        share|cite|improve this answer























          up vote
          4
          down vote










          up vote
          4
          down vote









          Your suspicion is correct. If $X$ and $Y$ are topological spaces with equivalence relations $sim$ and $approx$ and $f:Xto Y$ is a homeomorphism such that $xsim y$ if and only if $f(x)approx f(y)$, then $f$ passes to the quotient as $X/_sim cong Y/_approx$.



          Proof goes roughly like this: define $widetilde{f}([x]_sim)doteq [f(x)]_approx$. We have that $widetilde{f}$ is well-defined and injective because of the condition relating $sim$ and $approx$, while surjectivity follows from the surjectivity of $f$. Continuity of $widetilde{f}$ and $widetilde{f}^{-1}$ follow from the universal property of the quotient topologies applied to the relations $widetilde{f}circpi_{sim}=pi_{approx}circ f$ and $widetilde{f}^{-1}circ pi_{approx}=pi_simcirc f^{-1}$ with the continuity of $f$ and $f^{-1}$.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          Your suspicion is correct. If $X$ and $Y$ are topological spaces with equivalence relations $sim$ and $approx$ and $f:Xto Y$ is a homeomorphism such that $xsim y$ if and only if $f(x)approx f(y)$, then $f$ passes to the quotient as $X/_sim cong Y/_approx$.



          Proof goes roughly like this: define $widetilde{f}([x]_sim)doteq [f(x)]_approx$. We have that $widetilde{f}$ is well-defined and injective because of the condition relating $sim$ and $approx$, while surjectivity follows from the surjectivity of $f$. Continuity of $widetilde{f}$ and $widetilde{f}^{-1}$ follow from the universal property of the quotient topologies applied to the relations $widetilde{f}circpi_{sim}=pi_{approx}circ f$ and $widetilde{f}^{-1}circ pi_{approx}=pi_simcirc f^{-1}$ with the continuity of $f$ and $f^{-1}$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered 5 hours ago









          Ivo Terek

          45.2k951139




          45.2k951139






















              up vote
              3
              down vote













              I think you are correct. Here is a sketch of the argument:



              $phi:=pi_Ycirc f$ is a continuous surjection: $Xto Y/approx$ and it induces a bijection: $X^*=left { phi^{-1}([y]): [y]in Y/approx right }overset{overlinephi}{rightarrow} Y/approx , $ which is a homeomorphism if and only if $phi$ is a quotient map.



              As $phi $ is indeed a quotient map, the induced map is a homeomorphism. So, $X/sim$ and $Y/approx$ will be homoeomorphic if and only if $X^*$ and $X/sim$ are.



              This means that the map $[x]mapsto f^{-1}circ pi^{-1}_Y([y])$ must be a homeomorphism. That is, $f([x])mapsto pi^{-1}_Y([y])$ must be a homeomorphism.



              But the above map is well-defined if and only if $xsim x'Rightarrow f(x)approx f(x'),$ and in this case, it is obviously continuous, and it should be easy to check that it is bijective with continuous inverse.






              share|cite|improve this answer



























                up vote
                3
                down vote













                I think you are correct. Here is a sketch of the argument:



                $phi:=pi_Ycirc f$ is a continuous surjection: $Xto Y/approx$ and it induces a bijection: $X^*=left { phi^{-1}([y]): [y]in Y/approx right }overset{overlinephi}{rightarrow} Y/approx , $ which is a homeomorphism if and only if $phi$ is a quotient map.



                As $phi $ is indeed a quotient map, the induced map is a homeomorphism. So, $X/sim$ and $Y/approx$ will be homoeomorphic if and only if $X^*$ and $X/sim$ are.



                This means that the map $[x]mapsto f^{-1}circ pi^{-1}_Y([y])$ must be a homeomorphism. That is, $f([x])mapsto pi^{-1}_Y([y])$ must be a homeomorphism.



                But the above map is well-defined if and only if $xsim x'Rightarrow f(x)approx f(x'),$ and in this case, it is obviously continuous, and it should be easy to check that it is bijective with continuous inverse.






                share|cite|improve this answer

























                  up vote
                  3
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  3
                  down vote









                  I think you are correct. Here is a sketch of the argument:



                  $phi:=pi_Ycirc f$ is a continuous surjection: $Xto Y/approx$ and it induces a bijection: $X^*=left { phi^{-1}([y]): [y]in Y/approx right }overset{overlinephi}{rightarrow} Y/approx , $ which is a homeomorphism if and only if $phi$ is a quotient map.



                  As $phi $ is indeed a quotient map, the induced map is a homeomorphism. So, $X/sim$ and $Y/approx$ will be homoeomorphic if and only if $X^*$ and $X/sim$ are.



                  This means that the map $[x]mapsto f^{-1}circ pi^{-1}_Y([y])$ must be a homeomorphism. That is, $f([x])mapsto pi^{-1}_Y([y])$ must be a homeomorphism.



                  But the above map is well-defined if and only if $xsim x'Rightarrow f(x)approx f(x'),$ and in this case, it is obviously continuous, and it should be easy to check that it is bijective with continuous inverse.






                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  I think you are correct. Here is a sketch of the argument:



                  $phi:=pi_Ycirc f$ is a continuous surjection: $Xto Y/approx$ and it induces a bijection: $X^*=left { phi^{-1}([y]): [y]in Y/approx right }overset{overlinephi}{rightarrow} Y/approx , $ which is a homeomorphism if and only if $phi$ is a quotient map.



                  As $phi $ is indeed a quotient map, the induced map is a homeomorphism. So, $X/sim$ and $Y/approx$ will be homoeomorphic if and only if $X^*$ and $X/sim$ are.



                  This means that the map $[x]mapsto f^{-1}circ pi^{-1}_Y([y])$ must be a homeomorphism. That is, $f([x])mapsto pi^{-1}_Y([y])$ must be a homeomorphism.



                  But the above map is well-defined if and only if $xsim x'Rightarrow f(x)approx f(x'),$ and in this case, it is obviously continuous, and it should be easy to check that it is bijective with continuous inverse.







                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited 3 hours ago

























                  answered 4 hours ago









                  Matematleta

                  9,7772918




                  9,7772918






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                      Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                      Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3041546%2fwhen-are-quotients-of-homeomorphic-spaces-homeomorphic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Ellipse (mathématiques)

                      Quarter-circle Tiles

                      Mont Emei