A question about prime gaps











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












I have been reading the Wikipedia article about prime gaps (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_gap) and I came across the following:




Hoheisel was the first to show that there exists a constant $theta<1$ such that $$pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)simfrac{x^theta}{log x}$$ as $x$ tends to infinity.




I have a few questions:




  1. What's the meaning of the $sim$ symbol?


  2. Does the symbol $sim$ mean that $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ is asymptotic to $x^theta/log x$? If this is the case, does this mean that $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ is always greater than $x^theta/log x$ at least for sufficiently large $x$? Is $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ the same as $pi[x,x+x^theta]$, that is to say, the amount of primes in the interval $[x,x+x^theta]$?



I'm not sure what the above expression means, and I'm not sure what it means when they say that a certain function is "asymptotic" to another function or when they say that a certain asymptotic formula holds.




  1. Also, in the above expression, is $log$ the natural logarithm or the logarithm in base $10$?






number-theory functions prime-numbers asymptotics prime-gaps







share|cite|improve this question




















  • 4




    $sim$ means asymptotic equality, so $$lim_{xtoinfty} (pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x))frac{log x}{x^theta} = 1.$$ And $log$ is the natural logarithm.
    – Daniel Fischer♦
    Mar 13 '14 at 23:35










  • Thank you for your comment. But does this mean that $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ is always greater than $x^theta/log x$? And is $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ the same as $pi[x,x+x^theta]$?
    – User X
    Mar 14 '14 at 1:28










  • No, it need not always be greater. It cannot be too much smaller in the long run, however. If $pi[x,x+x^theta]$ means the number of primes between $x$ and $x+x^theta$, then it means the same as $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$.
    – Daniel Fischer♦
    Mar 14 '14 at 1:49










  • I think I'm kind of confused and maybe I'm mixing up things. For example, if consider the function $f(x)=1/x$, then its asymptotes are the $x$-axis and the $y$-axis. If consider the positive values for $x$, then as $x$ increases $f(x)=1/x$ gets smaller and smaller but never reaches $0$ (the graph of the function never touches the $x$-axis). This is why I thought that if a function $f(x)$ was asymptotic to another function $g(x)$, then $f(x)$ was always greater than $g(x)$ (or the other way round). What can I do to correctly understand this specific topic? I'm confused.
    – User X
    Mar 14 '14 at 2:19












  • $f sim g$ means $$lim_{xtoinfty} frac{f(x)}{g(x)} = 1.$$ That is something different from (but not entirely unrelated to) the asymptotes of functions like the axes for $1/x$.
    – Daniel Fischer♦
    Mar 14 '14 at 2:23















up vote
2
down vote

favorite












I have been reading the Wikipedia article about prime gaps (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_gap) and I came across the following:




Hoheisel was the first to show that there exists a constant $theta<1$ such that $$pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)simfrac{x^theta}{log x}$$ as $x$ tends to infinity.




I have a few questions:




  1. What's the meaning of the $sim$ symbol?


  2. Does the symbol $sim$ mean that $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ is asymptotic to $x^theta/log x$? If this is the case, does this mean that $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ is always greater than $x^theta/log x$ at least for sufficiently large $x$? Is $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ the same as $pi[x,x+x^theta]$, that is to say, the amount of primes in the interval $[x,x+x^theta]$?



I'm not sure what the above expression means, and I'm not sure what it means when they say that a certain function is "asymptotic" to another function or when they say that a certain asymptotic formula holds.




  1. Also, in the above expression, is $log$ the natural logarithm or the logarithm in base $10$?






number-theory functions prime-numbers asymptotics prime-gaps







share|cite|improve this question




















  • 4




    $sim$ means asymptotic equality, so $$lim_{xtoinfty} (pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x))frac{log x}{x^theta} = 1.$$ And $log$ is the natural logarithm.
    – Daniel Fischer♦
    Mar 13 '14 at 23:35










  • Thank you for your comment. But does this mean that $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ is always greater than $x^theta/log x$? And is $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ the same as $pi[x,x+x^theta]$?
    – User X
    Mar 14 '14 at 1:28










  • No, it need not always be greater. It cannot be too much smaller in the long run, however. If $pi[x,x+x^theta]$ means the number of primes between $x$ and $x+x^theta$, then it means the same as $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$.
    – Daniel Fischer♦
    Mar 14 '14 at 1:49










  • I think I'm kind of confused and maybe I'm mixing up things. For example, if consider the function $f(x)=1/x$, then its asymptotes are the $x$-axis and the $y$-axis. If consider the positive values for $x$, then as $x$ increases $f(x)=1/x$ gets smaller and smaller but never reaches $0$ (the graph of the function never touches the $x$-axis). This is why I thought that if a function $f(x)$ was asymptotic to another function $g(x)$, then $f(x)$ was always greater than $g(x)$ (or the other way round). What can I do to correctly understand this specific topic? I'm confused.
    – User X
    Mar 14 '14 at 2:19












  • $f sim g$ means $$lim_{xtoinfty} frac{f(x)}{g(x)} = 1.$$ That is something different from (but not entirely unrelated to) the asymptotes of functions like the axes for $1/x$.
    – Daniel Fischer♦
    Mar 14 '14 at 2:23













up vote
2
down vote

favorite









up vote
2
down vote

favorite











I have been reading the Wikipedia article about prime gaps (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_gap) and I came across the following:




Hoheisel was the first to show that there exists a constant $theta<1$ such that $$pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)simfrac{x^theta}{log x}$$ as $x$ tends to infinity.




I have a few questions:




  1. What's the meaning of the $sim$ symbol?


  2. Does the symbol $sim$ mean that $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ is asymptotic to $x^theta/log x$? If this is the case, does this mean that $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ is always greater than $x^theta/log x$ at least for sufficiently large $x$? Is $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ the same as $pi[x,x+x^theta]$, that is to say, the amount of primes in the interval $[x,x+x^theta]$?



I'm not sure what the above expression means, and I'm not sure what it means when they say that a certain function is "asymptotic" to another function or when they say that a certain asymptotic formula holds.




  1. Also, in the above expression, is $log$ the natural logarithm or the logarithm in base $10$?






number-theory functions prime-numbers asymptotics prime-gaps







share|cite|improve this question















I have been reading the Wikipedia article about prime gaps (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_gap) and I came across the following:




Hoheisel was the first to show that there exists a constant $theta<1$ such that $$pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)simfrac{x^theta}{log x}$$ as $x$ tends to infinity.




I have a few questions:




  1. What's the meaning of the $sim$ symbol?


  2. Does the symbol $sim$ mean that $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ is asymptotic to $x^theta/log x$? If this is the case, does this mean that $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ is always greater than $x^theta/log x$ at least for sufficiently large $x$? Is $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ the same as $pi[x,x+x^theta]$, that is to say, the amount of primes in the interval $[x,x+x^theta]$?



I'm not sure what the above expression means, and I'm not sure what it means when they say that a certain function is "asymptotic" to another function or when they say that a certain asymptotic formula holds.




  1. Also, in the above expression, is $log$ the natural logarithm or the logarithm in base $10$?






number-theory functions prime-numbers asymptotics prime-gaps




number-theory functions prime-numbers asymptotics prime-gaps






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 22 at 9:52









Klangen

1,43711232




1,43711232










asked Mar 13 '14 at 23:33









User X

114110




114110








  • 4




    $sim$ means asymptotic equality, so $$lim_{xtoinfty} (pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x))frac{log x}{x^theta} = 1.$$ And $log$ is the natural logarithm.
    – Daniel Fischer♦
    Mar 13 '14 at 23:35










  • Thank you for your comment. But does this mean that $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ is always greater than $x^theta/log x$? And is $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ the same as $pi[x,x+x^theta]$?
    – User X
    Mar 14 '14 at 1:28










  • No, it need not always be greater. It cannot be too much smaller in the long run, however. If $pi[x,x+x^theta]$ means the number of primes between $x$ and $x+x^theta$, then it means the same as $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$.
    – Daniel Fischer♦
    Mar 14 '14 at 1:49










  • I think I'm kind of confused and maybe I'm mixing up things. For example, if consider the function $f(x)=1/x$, then its asymptotes are the $x$-axis and the $y$-axis. If consider the positive values for $x$, then as $x$ increases $f(x)=1/x$ gets smaller and smaller but never reaches $0$ (the graph of the function never touches the $x$-axis). This is why I thought that if a function $f(x)$ was asymptotic to another function $g(x)$, then $f(x)$ was always greater than $g(x)$ (or the other way round). What can I do to correctly understand this specific topic? I'm confused.
    – User X
    Mar 14 '14 at 2:19












  • $f sim g$ means $$lim_{xtoinfty} frac{f(x)}{g(x)} = 1.$$ That is something different from (but not entirely unrelated to) the asymptotes of functions like the axes for $1/x$.
    – Daniel Fischer♦
    Mar 14 '14 at 2:23














  • 4




    $sim$ means asymptotic equality, so $$lim_{xtoinfty} (pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x))frac{log x}{x^theta} = 1.$$ And $log$ is the natural logarithm.
    – Daniel Fischer♦
    Mar 13 '14 at 23:35










  • Thank you for your comment. But does this mean that $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ is always greater than $x^theta/log x$? And is $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ the same as $pi[x,x+x^theta]$?
    – User X
    Mar 14 '14 at 1:28










  • No, it need not always be greater. It cannot be too much smaller in the long run, however. If $pi[x,x+x^theta]$ means the number of primes between $x$ and $x+x^theta$, then it means the same as $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$.
    – Daniel Fischer♦
    Mar 14 '14 at 1:49










  • I think I'm kind of confused and maybe I'm mixing up things. For example, if consider the function $f(x)=1/x$, then its asymptotes are the $x$-axis and the $y$-axis. If consider the positive values for $x$, then as $x$ increases $f(x)=1/x$ gets smaller and smaller but never reaches $0$ (the graph of the function never touches the $x$-axis). This is why I thought that if a function $f(x)$ was asymptotic to another function $g(x)$, then $f(x)$ was always greater than $g(x)$ (or the other way round). What can I do to correctly understand this specific topic? I'm confused.
    – User X
    Mar 14 '14 at 2:19












  • $f sim g$ means $$lim_{xtoinfty} frac{f(x)}{g(x)} = 1.$$ That is something different from (but not entirely unrelated to) the asymptotes of functions like the axes for $1/x$.
    – Daniel Fischer♦
    Mar 14 '14 at 2:23








4




4




$sim$ means asymptotic equality, so $$lim_{xtoinfty} (pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x))frac{log x}{x^theta} = 1.$$ And $log$ is the natural logarithm.
– Daniel Fischer♦
Mar 13 '14 at 23:35




$sim$ means asymptotic equality, so $$lim_{xtoinfty} (pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x))frac{log x}{x^theta} = 1.$$ And $log$ is the natural logarithm.
– Daniel Fischer♦
Mar 13 '14 at 23:35












Thank you for your comment. But does this mean that $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ is always greater than $x^theta/log x$? And is $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ the same as $pi[x,x+x^theta]$?
– User X
Mar 14 '14 at 1:28




Thank you for your comment. But does this mean that $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ is always greater than $x^theta/log x$? And is $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ the same as $pi[x,x+x^theta]$?
– User X
Mar 14 '14 at 1:28












No, it need not always be greater. It cannot be too much smaller in the long run, however. If $pi[x,x+x^theta]$ means the number of primes between $x$ and $x+x^theta$, then it means the same as $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$.
– Daniel Fischer♦
Mar 14 '14 at 1:49




No, it need not always be greater. It cannot be too much smaller in the long run, however. If $pi[x,x+x^theta]$ means the number of primes between $x$ and $x+x^theta$, then it means the same as $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$.
– Daniel Fischer♦
Mar 14 '14 at 1:49












I think I'm kind of confused and maybe I'm mixing up things. For example, if consider the function $f(x)=1/x$, then its asymptotes are the $x$-axis and the $y$-axis. If consider the positive values for $x$, then as $x$ increases $f(x)=1/x$ gets smaller and smaller but never reaches $0$ (the graph of the function never touches the $x$-axis). This is why I thought that if a function $f(x)$ was asymptotic to another function $g(x)$, then $f(x)$ was always greater than $g(x)$ (or the other way round). What can I do to correctly understand this specific topic? I'm confused.
– User X
Mar 14 '14 at 2:19






I think I'm kind of confused and maybe I'm mixing up things. For example, if consider the function $f(x)=1/x$, then its asymptotes are the $x$-axis and the $y$-axis. If consider the positive values for $x$, then as $x$ increases $f(x)=1/x$ gets smaller and smaller but never reaches $0$ (the graph of the function never touches the $x$-axis). This is why I thought that if a function $f(x)$ was asymptotic to another function $g(x)$, then $f(x)$ was always greater than $g(x)$ (or the other way round). What can I do to correctly understand this specific topic? I'm confused.
– User X
Mar 14 '14 at 2:19














$f sim g$ means $$lim_{xtoinfty} frac{f(x)}{g(x)} = 1.$$ That is something different from (but not entirely unrelated to) the asymptotes of functions like the axes for $1/x$.
– Daniel Fischer♦
Mar 14 '14 at 2:23




$f sim g$ means $$lim_{xtoinfty} frac{f(x)}{g(x)} = 1.$$ That is something different from (but not entirely unrelated to) the asymptotes of functions like the axes for $1/x$.
– Daniel Fischer♦
Mar 14 '14 at 2:23










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote













$f(x)sim g(x)$ just means that $lim_{xtoinfty}f(x)/g(x)=1.$ Informally, $g(x)$ is a good approximation for $f(x)$ (and vice versa) when $x$ is large.



$pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)sim x^theta/log x$ mean that $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ is greater than $0.99x^theta/log x$ for sufficiently large $x$, and this would remain true (for a different value of "large enough") if you replace 0.99 with any number less than 1. ($log$ is the natural logarithm, yes.)



$pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ is the number of primes in the interval $(x,x+x^theta]$, yes.






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f711517%2fa-question-about-prime-gaps%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    2
    down vote













    $f(x)sim g(x)$ just means that $lim_{xtoinfty}f(x)/g(x)=1.$ Informally, $g(x)$ is a good approximation for $f(x)$ (and vice versa) when $x$ is large.



    $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)sim x^theta/log x$ mean that $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ is greater than $0.99x^theta/log x$ for sufficiently large $x$, and this would remain true (for a different value of "large enough") if you replace 0.99 with any number less than 1. ($log$ is the natural logarithm, yes.)



    $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ is the number of primes in the interval $(x,x+x^theta]$, yes.






    share|cite|improve this answer

























      up vote
      2
      down vote













      $f(x)sim g(x)$ just means that $lim_{xtoinfty}f(x)/g(x)=1.$ Informally, $g(x)$ is a good approximation for $f(x)$ (and vice versa) when $x$ is large.



      $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)sim x^theta/log x$ mean that $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ is greater than $0.99x^theta/log x$ for sufficiently large $x$, and this would remain true (for a different value of "large enough") if you replace 0.99 with any number less than 1. ($log$ is the natural logarithm, yes.)



      $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ is the number of primes in the interval $(x,x+x^theta]$, yes.






      share|cite|improve this answer























        up vote
        2
        down vote










        up vote
        2
        down vote









        $f(x)sim g(x)$ just means that $lim_{xtoinfty}f(x)/g(x)=1.$ Informally, $g(x)$ is a good approximation for $f(x)$ (and vice versa) when $x$ is large.



        $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)sim x^theta/log x$ mean that $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ is greater than $0.99x^theta/log x$ for sufficiently large $x$, and this would remain true (for a different value of "large enough") if you replace 0.99 with any number less than 1. ($log$ is the natural logarithm, yes.)



        $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ is the number of primes in the interval $(x,x+x^theta]$, yes.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        $f(x)sim g(x)$ just means that $lim_{xtoinfty}f(x)/g(x)=1.$ Informally, $g(x)$ is a good approximation for $f(x)$ (and vice versa) when $x$ is large.



        $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)sim x^theta/log x$ mean that $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ is greater than $0.99x^theta/log x$ for sufficiently large $x$, and this would remain true (for a different value of "large enough") if you replace 0.99 with any number less than 1. ($log$ is the natural logarithm, yes.)



        $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ is the number of primes in the interval $(x,x+x^theta]$, yes.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Mar 14 '14 at 17:38









        Charles

        23.6k451113




        23.6k451113






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f711517%2fa-question-about-prime-gaps%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            Quarter-circle Tiles

            Image
            up vote 0 down vote favorite I have $99$ identical square tiles, each with a quarter-circle drawn on it like this: [asy] size(1.5cm); draw(Arc((2,0),1,90,180),red+1); draw((0,0)--(2,0)--(2,2)--(0,2)--(0,0)); [/asy] When I arrange the tiles in a $9times 11$ rectangular grid, each with a random orientation, what is the expected value of the number of full circles I form? I think this problem has to do with finding the chance any given 2x2 square has a circle, but I can't find it. expected-value share | cite | improve this question asked Nov 20 at 15:03 6minecraftninja 1 2
            Read more

            build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

            Image
            0 I think it's similiar to NFAs. I replace the finite states of the given automaton for start-states for my new automaton. I do it with $epsilon$ -transition from the start state to the actual finite states of the given automaton. The start state of the given automaton will be my accepting(finite) state of my new one. All transitions will be reversed of course to recognize the reversed word. But how do I have to change the stack of the pushdown automaton? That's tricky. formal-languages automata context-free-grammar share | cite | improve this question edited Nov 29 '18 at 14:20 joee
            Read more

            Mont Emei

            Image
            Mont Emei.mw-parser-output .entete.map{background-image:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7a/Picto_infobox_map.png")} Vue du sommet Wanfo du mont Emei Géographie Altitude 3 099  m , Wanfo Coordonnées 29° 31′ 11″ nord, 103° 19′ 57″ est Administration Pays   Chine Province Sichuan Ville-préfecture Leshan Géolocalisation sur la carte : Sichuan Mont Emei Géolocalisation sur la carte : Chine Mont Emei modifier   Paysage panoramique du mont Emei, incluant le paysage panoramique du grand Bouddha de Leshan *   Patrimoine mondial de l'UNESCO Passerelle en bois sur le versant ouest Pays   Chine Subdivision Sichuan Type Mixte Critères (iv) (vi) (x) Superficie 15 400 ha Numéro d’identification 779 Zone géographique Asie et Pacifique  ** Année d’inscription 1996 (20 e session) * Descriptif officiel UNESCO ** Classification géog
            Read more