A question about prime gaps
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I have been reading the Wikipedia article about prime gaps (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_gap) and I came across the following:
Hoheisel was the first to show that there exists a constant $theta<1$ such that $$pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)simfrac{x^theta}{log x}$$ as $x$ tends to infinity.
I have a few questions:
What's the meaning of the $sim$ symbol?
Does the symbol $sim$ mean that $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ is asymptotic to $x^theta/log x$? If this is the case, does this mean that $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ is always greater than $x^theta/log x$ at least for sufficiently large $x$? Is $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ the same as $pi[x,x+x^theta]$, that is to say, the amount of primes in the interval $[x,x+x^theta]$?
I'm not sure what the above expression means, and I'm not sure what it means when they say that a certain function is "asymptotic" to another function or when they say that a certain asymptotic formula holds.
- Also, in the above expression, is $log$ the natural logarithm or the logarithm in base $10$?
number-theory functions prime-numbers asymptotics prime-gaps
|
show 6 more comments
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I have been reading the Wikipedia article about prime gaps (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_gap) and I came across the following:
Hoheisel was the first to show that there exists a constant $theta<1$ such that $$pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)simfrac{x^theta}{log x}$$ as $x$ tends to infinity.
I have a few questions:
What's the meaning of the $sim$ symbol?
Does the symbol $sim$ mean that $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ is asymptotic to $x^theta/log x$? If this is the case, does this mean that $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ is always greater than $x^theta/log x$ at least for sufficiently large $x$? Is $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ the same as $pi[x,x+x^theta]$, that is to say, the amount of primes in the interval $[x,x+x^theta]$?
I'm not sure what the above expression means, and I'm not sure what it means when they say that a certain function is "asymptotic" to another function or when they say that a certain asymptotic formula holds.
- Also, in the above expression, is $log$ the natural logarithm or the logarithm in base $10$?
number-theory functions prime-numbers asymptotics prime-gaps
4
$sim$ means asymptotic equality, so $$lim_{xtoinfty} (pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x))frac{log x}{x^theta} = 1.$$ And $log$ is the natural logarithm.
– Daniel Fischer♦
Mar 13 '14 at 23:35
Thank you for your comment. But does this mean that $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ is always greater than $x^theta/log x$? And is $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ the same as $pi[x,x+x^theta]$?
– User X
Mar 14 '14 at 1:28
No, it need not always be greater. It cannot be too much smaller in the long run, however. If $pi[x,x+x^theta]$ means the number of primes between $x$ and $x+x^theta$, then it means the same as $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$.
– Daniel Fischer♦
Mar 14 '14 at 1:49
I think I'm kind of confused and maybe I'm mixing up things. For example, if consider the function $f(x)=1/x$, then its asymptotes are the $x$-axis and the $y$-axis. If consider the positive values for $x$, then as $x$ increases $f(x)=1/x$ gets smaller and smaller but never reaches $0$ (the graph of the function never touches the $x$-axis). This is why I thought that if a function $f(x)$ was asymptotic to another function $g(x)$, then $f(x)$ was always greater than $g(x)$ (or the other way round). What can I do to correctly understand this specific topic? I'm confused.
– User X
Mar 14 '14 at 2:19
$f sim g$ means $$lim_{xtoinfty} frac{f(x)}{g(x)} = 1.$$ That is something different from (but not entirely unrelated to) the asymptotes of functions like the axes for $1/x$.
– Daniel Fischer♦
Mar 14 '14 at 2:23
|
show 6 more comments
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I have been reading the Wikipedia article about prime gaps (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_gap) and I came across the following:
Hoheisel was the first to show that there exists a constant $theta<1$ such that $$pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)simfrac{x^theta}{log x}$$ as $x$ tends to infinity.
I have a few questions:
What's the meaning of the $sim$ symbol?
Does the symbol $sim$ mean that $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ is asymptotic to $x^theta/log x$? If this is the case, does this mean that $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ is always greater than $x^theta/log x$ at least for sufficiently large $x$? Is $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ the same as $pi[x,x+x^theta]$, that is to say, the amount of primes in the interval $[x,x+x^theta]$?
I'm not sure what the above expression means, and I'm not sure what it means when they say that a certain function is "asymptotic" to another function or when they say that a certain asymptotic formula holds.
- Also, in the above expression, is $log$ the natural logarithm or the logarithm in base $10$?
number-theory functions prime-numbers asymptotics prime-gaps
I have been reading the Wikipedia article about prime gaps (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_gap) and I came across the following:
Hoheisel was the first to show that there exists a constant $theta<1$ such that $$pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)simfrac{x^theta}{log x}$$ as $x$ tends to infinity.
I have a few questions:
What's the meaning of the $sim$ symbol?
Does the symbol $sim$ mean that $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ is asymptotic to $x^theta/log x$? If this is the case, does this mean that $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ is always greater than $x^theta/log x$ at least for sufficiently large $x$? Is $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ the same as $pi[x,x+x^theta]$, that is to say, the amount of primes in the interval $[x,x+x^theta]$?
I'm not sure what the above expression means, and I'm not sure what it means when they say that a certain function is "asymptotic" to another function or when they say that a certain asymptotic formula holds.
- Also, in the above expression, is $log$ the natural logarithm or the logarithm in base $10$?
number-theory functions prime-numbers asymptotics prime-gaps
number-theory functions prime-numbers asymptotics prime-gaps
edited Nov 22 at 9:52
Klangen
1,43711232
1,43711232
asked Mar 13 '14 at 23:33
User X
114110
114110
4
$sim$ means asymptotic equality, so $$lim_{xtoinfty} (pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x))frac{log x}{x^theta} = 1.$$ And $log$ is the natural logarithm.
– Daniel Fischer♦
Mar 13 '14 at 23:35
Thank you for your comment. But does this mean that $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ is always greater than $x^theta/log x$? And is $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ the same as $pi[x,x+x^theta]$?
– User X
Mar 14 '14 at 1:28
No, it need not always be greater. It cannot be too much smaller in the long run, however. If $pi[x,x+x^theta]$ means the number of primes between $x$ and $x+x^theta$, then it means the same as $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$.
– Daniel Fischer♦
Mar 14 '14 at 1:49
I think I'm kind of confused and maybe I'm mixing up things. For example, if consider the function $f(x)=1/x$, then its asymptotes are the $x$-axis and the $y$-axis. If consider the positive values for $x$, then as $x$ increases $f(x)=1/x$ gets smaller and smaller but never reaches $0$ (the graph of the function never touches the $x$-axis). This is why I thought that if a function $f(x)$ was asymptotic to another function $g(x)$, then $f(x)$ was always greater than $g(x)$ (or the other way round). What can I do to correctly understand this specific topic? I'm confused.
– User X
Mar 14 '14 at 2:19
$f sim g$ means $$lim_{xtoinfty} frac{f(x)}{g(x)} = 1.$$ That is something different from (but not entirely unrelated to) the asymptotes of functions like the axes for $1/x$.
– Daniel Fischer♦
Mar 14 '14 at 2:23
|
show 6 more comments
4
$sim$ means asymptotic equality, so $$lim_{xtoinfty} (pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x))frac{log x}{x^theta} = 1.$$ And $log$ is the natural logarithm.
– Daniel Fischer♦
Mar 13 '14 at 23:35
Thank you for your comment. But does this mean that $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ is always greater than $x^theta/log x$? And is $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ the same as $pi[x,x+x^theta]$?
– User X
Mar 14 '14 at 1:28
No, it need not always be greater. It cannot be too much smaller in the long run, however. If $pi[x,x+x^theta]$ means the number of primes between $x$ and $x+x^theta$, then it means the same as $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$.
– Daniel Fischer♦
Mar 14 '14 at 1:49
I think I'm kind of confused and maybe I'm mixing up things. For example, if consider the function $f(x)=1/x$, then its asymptotes are the $x$-axis and the $y$-axis. If consider the positive values for $x$, then as $x$ increases $f(x)=1/x$ gets smaller and smaller but never reaches $0$ (the graph of the function never touches the $x$-axis). This is why I thought that if a function $f(x)$ was asymptotic to another function $g(x)$, then $f(x)$ was always greater than $g(x)$ (or the other way round). What can I do to correctly understand this specific topic? I'm confused.
– User X
Mar 14 '14 at 2:19
$f sim g$ means $$lim_{xtoinfty} frac{f(x)}{g(x)} = 1.$$ That is something different from (but not entirely unrelated to) the asymptotes of functions like the axes for $1/x$.
– Daniel Fischer♦
Mar 14 '14 at 2:23
4
4
$sim$ means asymptotic equality, so $$lim_{xtoinfty} (pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x))frac{log x}{x^theta} = 1.$$ And $log$ is the natural logarithm.
– Daniel Fischer♦
Mar 13 '14 at 23:35
$sim$ means asymptotic equality, so $$lim_{xtoinfty} (pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x))frac{log x}{x^theta} = 1.$$ And $log$ is the natural logarithm.
– Daniel Fischer♦
Mar 13 '14 at 23:35
Thank you for your comment. But does this mean that $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ is always greater than $x^theta/log x$? And is $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ the same as $pi[x,x+x^theta]$?
– User X
Mar 14 '14 at 1:28
Thank you for your comment. But does this mean that $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ is always greater than $x^theta/log x$? And is $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ the same as $pi[x,x+x^theta]$?
– User X
Mar 14 '14 at 1:28
No, it need not always be greater. It cannot be too much smaller in the long run, however. If $pi[x,x+x^theta]$ means the number of primes between $x$ and $x+x^theta$, then it means the same as $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$.
– Daniel Fischer♦
Mar 14 '14 at 1:49
No, it need not always be greater. It cannot be too much smaller in the long run, however. If $pi[x,x+x^theta]$ means the number of primes between $x$ and $x+x^theta$, then it means the same as $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$.
– Daniel Fischer♦
Mar 14 '14 at 1:49
I think I'm kind of confused and maybe I'm mixing up things. For example, if consider the function $f(x)=1/x$, then its asymptotes are the $x$-axis and the $y$-axis. If consider the positive values for $x$, then as $x$ increases $f(x)=1/x$ gets smaller and smaller but never reaches $0$ (the graph of the function never touches the $x$-axis). This is why I thought that if a function $f(x)$ was asymptotic to another function $g(x)$, then $f(x)$ was always greater than $g(x)$ (or the other way round). What can I do to correctly understand this specific topic? I'm confused.
– User X
Mar 14 '14 at 2:19
I think I'm kind of confused and maybe I'm mixing up things. For example, if consider the function $f(x)=1/x$, then its asymptotes are the $x$-axis and the $y$-axis. If consider the positive values for $x$, then as $x$ increases $f(x)=1/x$ gets smaller and smaller but never reaches $0$ (the graph of the function never touches the $x$-axis). This is why I thought that if a function $f(x)$ was asymptotic to another function $g(x)$, then $f(x)$ was always greater than $g(x)$ (or the other way round). What can I do to correctly understand this specific topic? I'm confused.
– User X
Mar 14 '14 at 2:19
$f sim g$ means $$lim_{xtoinfty} frac{f(x)}{g(x)} = 1.$$ That is something different from (but not entirely unrelated to) the asymptotes of functions like the axes for $1/x$.
– Daniel Fischer♦
Mar 14 '14 at 2:23
$f sim g$ means $$lim_{xtoinfty} frac{f(x)}{g(x)} = 1.$$ That is something different from (but not entirely unrelated to) the asymptotes of functions like the axes for $1/x$.
– Daniel Fischer♦
Mar 14 '14 at 2:23
|
show 6 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
$f(x)sim g(x)$ just means that $lim_{xtoinfty}f(x)/g(x)=1.$ Informally, $g(x)$ is a good approximation for $f(x)$ (and vice versa) when $x$ is large.
$pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)sim x^theta/log x$ mean that $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ is greater than $0.99x^theta/log x$ for sufficiently large $x$, and this would remain true (for a different value of "large enough") if you replace 0.99 with any number less than 1. ($log$ is the natural logarithm, yes.)
$pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ is the number of primes in the interval $(x,x+x^theta]$, yes.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f711517%2fa-question-about-prime-gaps%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
$f(x)sim g(x)$ just means that $lim_{xtoinfty}f(x)/g(x)=1.$ Informally, $g(x)$ is a good approximation for $f(x)$ (and vice versa) when $x$ is large.
$pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)sim x^theta/log x$ mean that $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ is greater than $0.99x^theta/log x$ for sufficiently large $x$, and this would remain true (for a different value of "large enough") if you replace 0.99 with any number less than 1. ($log$ is the natural logarithm, yes.)
$pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ is the number of primes in the interval $(x,x+x^theta]$, yes.
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
$f(x)sim g(x)$ just means that $lim_{xtoinfty}f(x)/g(x)=1.$ Informally, $g(x)$ is a good approximation for $f(x)$ (and vice versa) when $x$ is large.
$pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)sim x^theta/log x$ mean that $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ is greater than $0.99x^theta/log x$ for sufficiently large $x$, and this would remain true (for a different value of "large enough") if you replace 0.99 with any number less than 1. ($log$ is the natural logarithm, yes.)
$pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ is the number of primes in the interval $(x,x+x^theta]$, yes.
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
$f(x)sim g(x)$ just means that $lim_{xtoinfty}f(x)/g(x)=1.$ Informally, $g(x)$ is a good approximation for $f(x)$ (and vice versa) when $x$ is large.
$pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)sim x^theta/log x$ mean that $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ is greater than $0.99x^theta/log x$ for sufficiently large $x$, and this would remain true (for a different value of "large enough") if you replace 0.99 with any number less than 1. ($log$ is the natural logarithm, yes.)
$pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ is the number of primes in the interval $(x,x+x^theta]$, yes.
$f(x)sim g(x)$ just means that $lim_{xtoinfty}f(x)/g(x)=1.$ Informally, $g(x)$ is a good approximation for $f(x)$ (and vice versa) when $x$ is large.
$pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)sim x^theta/log x$ mean that $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ is greater than $0.99x^theta/log x$ for sufficiently large $x$, and this would remain true (for a different value of "large enough") if you replace 0.99 with any number less than 1. ($log$ is the natural logarithm, yes.)
$pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ is the number of primes in the interval $(x,x+x^theta]$, yes.
answered Mar 14 '14 at 17:38
Charles
23.6k451113
23.6k451113
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f711517%2fa-question-about-prime-gaps%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
4
$sim$ means asymptotic equality, so $$lim_{xtoinfty} (pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x))frac{log x}{x^theta} = 1.$$ And $log$ is the natural logarithm.
– Daniel Fischer♦
Mar 13 '14 at 23:35
Thank you for your comment. But does this mean that $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ is always greater than $x^theta/log x$? And is $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$ the same as $pi[x,x+x^theta]$?
– User X
Mar 14 '14 at 1:28
No, it need not always be greater. It cannot be too much smaller in the long run, however. If $pi[x,x+x^theta]$ means the number of primes between $x$ and $x+x^theta$, then it means the same as $pi(x+x^theta)-pi(x)$.
– Daniel Fischer♦
Mar 14 '14 at 1:49
I think I'm kind of confused and maybe I'm mixing up things. For example, if consider the function $f(x)=1/x$, then its asymptotes are the $x$-axis and the $y$-axis. If consider the positive values for $x$, then as $x$ increases $f(x)=1/x$ gets smaller and smaller but never reaches $0$ (the graph of the function never touches the $x$-axis). This is why I thought that if a function $f(x)$ was asymptotic to another function $g(x)$, then $f(x)$ was always greater than $g(x)$ (or the other way round). What can I do to correctly understand this specific topic? I'm confused.
– User X
Mar 14 '14 at 2:19
$f sim g$ means $$lim_{xtoinfty} frac{f(x)}{g(x)} = 1.$$ That is something different from (but not entirely unrelated to) the asymptotes of functions like the axes for $1/x$.
– Daniel Fischer♦
Mar 14 '14 at 2:23