List the subgroups of $mathbb{Z}_{26}$ [closed]
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I think the answer is $mathbb{Z}_n$ where $n$ is all the factors of $26$. Is this right?
abstract-algebra group-theory
closed as off-topic by José Carlos Santos, Gibbs, amWhy, ancientmathematician, Rebellos Nov 22 at 16:01
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – José Carlos Santos, Gibbs, amWhy, ancientmathematician, Rebellos
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I think the answer is $mathbb{Z}_n$ where $n$ is all the factors of $26$. Is this right?
abstract-algebra group-theory
closed as off-topic by José Carlos Santos, Gibbs, amWhy, ancientmathematician, Rebellos Nov 22 at 16:01
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – José Carlos Santos, Gibbs, amWhy, ancientmathematician, Rebellos
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I think the answer is $mathbb{Z}_n$ where $n$ is all the factors of $26$. Is this right?
abstract-algebra group-theory
I think the answer is $mathbb{Z}_n$ where $n$ is all the factors of $26$. Is this right?
abstract-algebra group-theory
abstract-algebra group-theory
edited Nov 22 at 9:50
user26857
39.2k123882
39.2k123882
asked Oct 3 '16 at 11:54
PolkaDot
245
245
closed as off-topic by José Carlos Santos, Gibbs, amWhy, ancientmathematician, Rebellos Nov 22 at 16:01
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – José Carlos Santos, Gibbs, amWhy, ancientmathematician, Rebellos
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
closed as off-topic by José Carlos Santos, Gibbs, amWhy, ancientmathematician, Rebellos Nov 22 at 16:01
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – José Carlos Santos, Gibbs, amWhy, ancientmathematician, Rebellos
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
$26 = 2cdot 13$. Both 2 and 13 are the prime factors of $26$, and cannot be reduced further.
So we know that So $$mathbb Z_{26} equiv mathbb Z_2 times mathbb Z_{13}$$
We have Lagrange Theorem to thank for proving that:
"...for any finite group $G,$ the order (number of elements) of every subgroup $H$ of $G$ divides the order of $G.$ The converse of the theorem applies only to cyclic groups.
More to the point: You need to prove that these are, and are the only, subgroups of $mathbb Z_{26}$:
$mathbb Z_{26},; {0},; {0,13},$ and ${0, 2,4,6,8,10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24}.$
Notice the orders of of the groups listed: in order, we have $26, 1, 2, 13 $, which all divide $26$ (with no remainder).
And, indeed, we have that a cyclic group of order $n$ is isomorphic to the group $mathbb Z_n$
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Not quite: Every subgroup of $mathbb{Z}_{26}$ is isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}_n$ for $n|26$, but such a $mathbb{Z}_n$ is not contained in $mathbb{Z}_{26}$ in a strict sense. The list of subgroups is the following:
- trivial subgroups: $mathbb{Z}_{26}$, ${0}$
- non-trivial subgroups: ${0,2,4,6,8,10,12,14,16,18,20,22,24}$, ${0,13}$.
Can you prove by yourself that these are indeed all subgroups? Do you see why the first non-trivial subgroup is isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}_{13}$ and the second one is isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}_2$?
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
$26 = 2cdot 13$. Both 2 and 13 are the prime factors of $26$, and cannot be reduced further.
So we know that So $$mathbb Z_{26} equiv mathbb Z_2 times mathbb Z_{13}$$
We have Lagrange Theorem to thank for proving that:
"...for any finite group $G,$ the order (number of elements) of every subgroup $H$ of $G$ divides the order of $G.$ The converse of the theorem applies only to cyclic groups.
More to the point: You need to prove that these are, and are the only, subgroups of $mathbb Z_{26}$:
$mathbb Z_{26},; {0},; {0,13},$ and ${0, 2,4,6,8,10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24}.$
Notice the orders of of the groups listed: in order, we have $26, 1, 2, 13 $, which all divide $26$ (with no remainder).
And, indeed, we have that a cyclic group of order $n$ is isomorphic to the group $mathbb Z_n$
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
$26 = 2cdot 13$. Both 2 and 13 are the prime factors of $26$, and cannot be reduced further.
So we know that So $$mathbb Z_{26} equiv mathbb Z_2 times mathbb Z_{13}$$
We have Lagrange Theorem to thank for proving that:
"...for any finite group $G,$ the order (number of elements) of every subgroup $H$ of $G$ divides the order of $G.$ The converse of the theorem applies only to cyclic groups.
More to the point: You need to prove that these are, and are the only, subgroups of $mathbb Z_{26}$:
$mathbb Z_{26},; {0},; {0,13},$ and ${0, 2,4,6,8,10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24}.$
Notice the orders of of the groups listed: in order, we have $26, 1, 2, 13 $, which all divide $26$ (with no remainder).
And, indeed, we have that a cyclic group of order $n$ is isomorphic to the group $mathbb Z_n$
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
$26 = 2cdot 13$. Both 2 and 13 are the prime factors of $26$, and cannot be reduced further.
So we know that So $$mathbb Z_{26} equiv mathbb Z_2 times mathbb Z_{13}$$
We have Lagrange Theorem to thank for proving that:
"...for any finite group $G,$ the order (number of elements) of every subgroup $H$ of $G$ divides the order of $G.$ The converse of the theorem applies only to cyclic groups.
More to the point: You need to prove that these are, and are the only, subgroups of $mathbb Z_{26}$:
$mathbb Z_{26},; {0},; {0,13},$ and ${0, 2,4,6,8,10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24}.$
Notice the orders of of the groups listed: in order, we have $26, 1, 2, 13 $, which all divide $26$ (with no remainder).
And, indeed, we have that a cyclic group of order $n$ is isomorphic to the group $mathbb Z_n$
$26 = 2cdot 13$. Both 2 and 13 are the prime factors of $26$, and cannot be reduced further.
So we know that So $$mathbb Z_{26} equiv mathbb Z_2 times mathbb Z_{13}$$
We have Lagrange Theorem to thank for proving that:
"...for any finite group $G,$ the order (number of elements) of every subgroup $H$ of $G$ divides the order of $G.$ The converse of the theorem applies only to cyclic groups.
More to the point: You need to prove that these are, and are the only, subgroups of $mathbb Z_{26}$:
$mathbb Z_{26},; {0},; {0,13},$ and ${0, 2,4,6,8,10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24}.$
Notice the orders of of the groups listed: in order, we have $26, 1, 2, 13 $, which all divide $26$ (with no remainder).
And, indeed, we have that a cyclic group of order $n$ is isomorphic to the group $mathbb Z_n$
edited Oct 3 '16 at 12:40
answered Oct 3 '16 at 12:09
amWhy
191k28224439
191k28224439
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Not quite: Every subgroup of $mathbb{Z}_{26}$ is isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}_n$ for $n|26$, but such a $mathbb{Z}_n$ is not contained in $mathbb{Z}_{26}$ in a strict sense. The list of subgroups is the following:
- trivial subgroups: $mathbb{Z}_{26}$, ${0}$
- non-trivial subgroups: ${0,2,4,6,8,10,12,14,16,18,20,22,24}$, ${0,13}$.
Can you prove by yourself that these are indeed all subgroups? Do you see why the first non-trivial subgroup is isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}_{13}$ and the second one is isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}_2$?
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Not quite: Every subgroup of $mathbb{Z}_{26}$ is isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}_n$ for $n|26$, but such a $mathbb{Z}_n$ is not contained in $mathbb{Z}_{26}$ in a strict sense. The list of subgroups is the following:
- trivial subgroups: $mathbb{Z}_{26}$, ${0}$
- non-trivial subgroups: ${0,2,4,6,8,10,12,14,16,18,20,22,24}$, ${0,13}$.
Can you prove by yourself that these are indeed all subgroups? Do you see why the first non-trivial subgroup is isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}_{13}$ and the second one is isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}_2$?
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
Not quite: Every subgroup of $mathbb{Z}_{26}$ is isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}_n$ for $n|26$, but such a $mathbb{Z}_n$ is not contained in $mathbb{Z}_{26}$ in a strict sense. The list of subgroups is the following:
- trivial subgroups: $mathbb{Z}_{26}$, ${0}$
- non-trivial subgroups: ${0,2,4,6,8,10,12,14,16,18,20,22,24}$, ${0,13}$.
Can you prove by yourself that these are indeed all subgroups? Do you see why the first non-trivial subgroup is isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}_{13}$ and the second one is isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}_2$?
Not quite: Every subgroup of $mathbb{Z}_{26}$ is isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}_n$ for $n|26$, but such a $mathbb{Z}_n$ is not contained in $mathbb{Z}_{26}$ in a strict sense. The list of subgroups is the following:
- trivial subgroups: $mathbb{Z}_{26}$, ${0}$
- non-trivial subgroups: ${0,2,4,6,8,10,12,14,16,18,20,22,24}$, ${0,13}$.
Can you prove by yourself that these are indeed all subgroups? Do you see why the first non-trivial subgroup is isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}_{13}$ and the second one is isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}_2$?
answered Oct 3 '16 at 12:07
Janik
1,4602418
1,4602418
add a comment |
add a comment |