List the subgroups of $mathbb{Z}_{26}$ [closed]











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I think the answer is $mathbb{Z}_n$ where $n$ is all the factors of $26$. Is this right?










share|cite|improve this question















closed as off-topic by José Carlos Santos, Gibbs, amWhy, ancientmathematician, Rebellos Nov 22 at 16:01


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – José Carlos Santos, Gibbs, amWhy, ancientmathematician, Rebellos

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

















    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    I think the answer is $mathbb{Z}_n$ where $n$ is all the factors of $26$. Is this right?










    share|cite|improve this question















    closed as off-topic by José Carlos Santos, Gibbs, amWhy, ancientmathematician, Rebellos Nov 22 at 16:01


    This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


    • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – José Carlos Santos, Gibbs, amWhy, ancientmathematician, Rebellos

    If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.















      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      I think the answer is $mathbb{Z}_n$ where $n$ is all the factors of $26$. Is this right?










      share|cite|improve this question















      I think the answer is $mathbb{Z}_n$ where $n$ is all the factors of $26$. Is this right?







      abstract-algebra group-theory






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 22 at 9:50









      user26857

      39.2k123882




      39.2k123882










      asked Oct 3 '16 at 11:54









      PolkaDot

      245




      245




      closed as off-topic by José Carlos Santos, Gibbs, amWhy, ancientmathematician, Rebellos Nov 22 at 16:01


      This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


      • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – José Carlos Santos, Gibbs, amWhy, ancientmathematician, Rebellos

      If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.




      closed as off-topic by José Carlos Santos, Gibbs, amWhy, ancientmathematician, Rebellos Nov 22 at 16:01


      This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


      • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – José Carlos Santos, Gibbs, amWhy, ancientmathematician, Rebellos

      If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          $26 = 2cdot 13$. Both 2 and 13 are the prime factors of $26$, and cannot be reduced further.

          So we know that So $$mathbb Z_{26} equiv mathbb Z_2 times mathbb Z_{13}$$



          We have Lagrange Theorem to thank for proving that:



          "...for any finite group $G,$ the order (number of elements) of every subgroup $H$ of $G$ divides the order of $G.$ The converse of the theorem applies only to cyclic groups.



          More to the point: You need to prove that these are, and are the only, subgroups of $mathbb Z_{26}$:



          $mathbb Z_{26},; {0},; {0,13},$ and ${0, 2,4,6,8,10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24}.$



          Notice the orders of of the groups listed: in order, we have $26, 1, 2, 13 $, which all divide $26$ (with no remainder).



          And, indeed, we have that a cyclic group of order $n$ is isomorphic to the group $mathbb Z_n$






          share|cite|improve this answer






























            up vote
            1
            down vote













            Not quite: Every subgroup of $mathbb{Z}_{26}$ is isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}_n$ for $n|26$, but such a $mathbb{Z}_n$ is not contained in $mathbb{Z}_{26}$ in a strict sense. The list of subgroups is the following:




            • trivial subgroups: $mathbb{Z}_{26}$, ${0}$

            • non-trivial subgroups: ${0,2,4,6,8,10,12,14,16,18,20,22,24}$, ${0,13}$.


            Can you prove by yourself that these are indeed all subgroups? Do you see why the first non-trivial subgroup is isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}_{13}$ and the second one is isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}_2$?






            share|cite|improve this answer




























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes








              up vote
              1
              down vote



              accepted










              $26 = 2cdot 13$. Both 2 and 13 are the prime factors of $26$, and cannot be reduced further.

              So we know that So $$mathbb Z_{26} equiv mathbb Z_2 times mathbb Z_{13}$$



              We have Lagrange Theorem to thank for proving that:



              "...for any finite group $G,$ the order (number of elements) of every subgroup $H$ of $G$ divides the order of $G.$ The converse of the theorem applies only to cyclic groups.



              More to the point: You need to prove that these are, and are the only, subgroups of $mathbb Z_{26}$:



              $mathbb Z_{26},; {0},; {0,13},$ and ${0, 2,4,6,8,10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24}.$



              Notice the orders of of the groups listed: in order, we have $26, 1, 2, 13 $, which all divide $26$ (with no remainder).



              And, indeed, we have that a cyclic group of order $n$ is isomorphic to the group $mathbb Z_n$






              share|cite|improve this answer



























                up vote
                1
                down vote



                accepted










                $26 = 2cdot 13$. Both 2 and 13 are the prime factors of $26$, and cannot be reduced further.

                So we know that So $$mathbb Z_{26} equiv mathbb Z_2 times mathbb Z_{13}$$



                We have Lagrange Theorem to thank for proving that:



                "...for any finite group $G,$ the order (number of elements) of every subgroup $H$ of $G$ divides the order of $G.$ The converse of the theorem applies only to cyclic groups.



                More to the point: You need to prove that these are, and are the only, subgroups of $mathbb Z_{26}$:



                $mathbb Z_{26},; {0},; {0,13},$ and ${0, 2,4,6,8,10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24}.$



                Notice the orders of of the groups listed: in order, we have $26, 1, 2, 13 $, which all divide $26$ (with no remainder).



                And, indeed, we have that a cyclic group of order $n$ is isomorphic to the group $mathbb Z_n$






                share|cite|improve this answer

























                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote



                  accepted







                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote



                  accepted






                  $26 = 2cdot 13$. Both 2 and 13 are the prime factors of $26$, and cannot be reduced further.

                  So we know that So $$mathbb Z_{26} equiv mathbb Z_2 times mathbb Z_{13}$$



                  We have Lagrange Theorem to thank for proving that:



                  "...for any finite group $G,$ the order (number of elements) of every subgroup $H$ of $G$ divides the order of $G.$ The converse of the theorem applies only to cyclic groups.



                  More to the point: You need to prove that these are, and are the only, subgroups of $mathbb Z_{26}$:



                  $mathbb Z_{26},; {0},; {0,13},$ and ${0, 2,4,6,8,10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24}.$



                  Notice the orders of of the groups listed: in order, we have $26, 1, 2, 13 $, which all divide $26$ (with no remainder).



                  And, indeed, we have that a cyclic group of order $n$ is isomorphic to the group $mathbb Z_n$






                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  $26 = 2cdot 13$. Both 2 and 13 are the prime factors of $26$, and cannot be reduced further.

                  So we know that So $$mathbb Z_{26} equiv mathbb Z_2 times mathbb Z_{13}$$



                  We have Lagrange Theorem to thank for proving that:



                  "...for any finite group $G,$ the order (number of elements) of every subgroup $H$ of $G$ divides the order of $G.$ The converse of the theorem applies only to cyclic groups.



                  More to the point: You need to prove that these are, and are the only, subgroups of $mathbb Z_{26}$:



                  $mathbb Z_{26},; {0},; {0,13},$ and ${0, 2,4,6,8,10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24}.$



                  Notice the orders of of the groups listed: in order, we have $26, 1, 2, 13 $, which all divide $26$ (with no remainder).



                  And, indeed, we have that a cyclic group of order $n$ is isomorphic to the group $mathbb Z_n$







                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited Oct 3 '16 at 12:40

























                  answered Oct 3 '16 at 12:09









                  amWhy

                  191k28224439




                  191k28224439






















                      up vote
                      1
                      down vote













                      Not quite: Every subgroup of $mathbb{Z}_{26}$ is isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}_n$ for $n|26$, but such a $mathbb{Z}_n$ is not contained in $mathbb{Z}_{26}$ in a strict sense. The list of subgroups is the following:




                      • trivial subgroups: $mathbb{Z}_{26}$, ${0}$

                      • non-trivial subgroups: ${0,2,4,6,8,10,12,14,16,18,20,22,24}$, ${0,13}$.


                      Can you prove by yourself that these are indeed all subgroups? Do you see why the first non-trivial subgroup is isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}_{13}$ and the second one is isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}_2$?






                      share|cite|improve this answer

























                        up vote
                        1
                        down vote













                        Not quite: Every subgroup of $mathbb{Z}_{26}$ is isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}_n$ for $n|26$, but such a $mathbb{Z}_n$ is not contained in $mathbb{Z}_{26}$ in a strict sense. The list of subgroups is the following:




                        • trivial subgroups: $mathbb{Z}_{26}$, ${0}$

                        • non-trivial subgroups: ${0,2,4,6,8,10,12,14,16,18,20,22,24}$, ${0,13}$.


                        Can you prove by yourself that these are indeed all subgroups? Do you see why the first non-trivial subgroup is isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}_{13}$ and the second one is isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}_2$?






                        share|cite|improve this answer























                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote










                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote









                          Not quite: Every subgroup of $mathbb{Z}_{26}$ is isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}_n$ for $n|26$, but such a $mathbb{Z}_n$ is not contained in $mathbb{Z}_{26}$ in a strict sense. The list of subgroups is the following:




                          • trivial subgroups: $mathbb{Z}_{26}$, ${0}$

                          • non-trivial subgroups: ${0,2,4,6,8,10,12,14,16,18,20,22,24}$, ${0,13}$.


                          Can you prove by yourself that these are indeed all subgroups? Do you see why the first non-trivial subgroup is isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}_{13}$ and the second one is isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}_2$?






                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          Not quite: Every subgroup of $mathbb{Z}_{26}$ is isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}_n$ for $n|26$, but such a $mathbb{Z}_n$ is not contained in $mathbb{Z}_{26}$ in a strict sense. The list of subgroups is the following:




                          • trivial subgroups: $mathbb{Z}_{26}$, ${0}$

                          • non-trivial subgroups: ${0,2,4,6,8,10,12,14,16,18,20,22,24}$, ${0,13}$.


                          Can you prove by yourself that these are indeed all subgroups? Do you see why the first non-trivial subgroup is isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}_{13}$ and the second one is isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}_2$?







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered Oct 3 '16 at 12:07









                          Janik

                          1,4602418




                          1,4602418















                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Quarter-circle Tiles

                              build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

                              Mont Emei