Norm of a function on a set of measure $0$ and convergence of a sequence on a set of finite measure
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Let $Esubsetmathbb{R}^n$ be a measurable set with finite Lebesgue measure, ${f_n}_{n∈N}$ be a sequence of measurable functions $f_n : E → mathbb{R}$, bounded in $L^p(E)$ for $p>1$, and pointwise converging to $f : E → mathbb{R}$ almost everywhere.
Since the sequence converge almost everywhere, consider the set $N_0$ of measure zero where the sequence does not converge, and $Esetminus N_0$ where the sequence converge. By Egorov theorem the sequence converges to $f$ uniformly on $Esetminus N_0$.
Study the convergence in $L^q(E)$ for $q∈(1,p)$:
begin{align*}
||f_n-f||_{L^q(E)}&le||f_n-f||_{L^q(N_0)}+||f_n-f||_{L^q(Esetminus N_0)} \ &le ||f_n||_{L^q(N_0)}+||f||_{L^q(N_0)}+||f_n-f||_{L^q(Esetminus N_0)}
end{align*}
I'd say that the first two norms in the rhs are $0$ since they are integrals on a set of measure $0$, but wouldn't this mean that $f_n$ converge to $f$ on $N_0$? But it is a contraddiction because we defined it as the set where the sequence does not converge, isn'it?
Moreover how to compute or bound the last norm on the rhs?
functional-analysis convergence
asked Nov 22 at 11:42
sound wave
1548
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Let $Esubsetmathbb{R}^n$ be a measurable set with finite Lebesgue measure, ${f_n}_{n∈N}$ be a sequence of measurable functions $f_n : E → mathbb{R}$, bounded in $L^p(E)$ for $p>1$, and pointwise converging to $f : E → mathbb{R}$ almost everywhere.
Since the sequence converge almost everywhere, consider the set $N_0$ of measure zero where the sequence does not converge, and $Esetminus N_0$ where the sequence converge. By Egorov theorem the sequence converges to $f$ uniformly on $Esetminus N_0$.
Study the convergence in $L^q(E)$ for $q∈(1,p)$:
begin{align*}
||f_n-f||_{L^q(E)}&le||f_n-f||_{L^q(N_0)}+||f_n-f||_{L^q(Esetminus N_0)} \ &le ||f_n||_{L^q(N_0)}+||f||_{L^q(N_0)}+||f_n-f||_{L^q(Esetminus N_0)}
end{align*}
I'd say that the first two norms in the rhs are $0$ since they are integrals on a set of measure $0$, but wouldn't this mean that $f_n$ converge to $f$ on $N_0$? But it is a contraddiction because we defined it as the set where the sequence does not converge, isn'it?
Moreover how to compute or bound the last norm on the rhs?
functional-analysis convergence
asked Nov 22 at 11:42
sound wave
1548
1
Egorov's Theorem does not say that the sequence converges uniformly on $N$. Your attempt to prove $L^{q}$ convergence completely fails.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Nov 22 at 11:45
I didnt say that Egorov theorem implies convergence on $N_0$, I obtain that from my assumptions on the values of the norm. I know I'm wrong, that's why I'm here asking for help.
– sound wave
Nov 22 at 11:57
The result you are trying ti prove is true but it has a lengthy argument. Are you familiar with uniform integrability? You have to show that ${|f_n|^{q}}$ (and hence ${|f_n-f|^{q}}$) is uniformly integrable from which $L^{q}$ convergence follows.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Nov 22 at 12:07
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Let $Esubsetmathbb{R}^n$ be a measurable set with finite Lebesgue measure, ${f_n}_{n∈N}$ be a sequence of measurable functions $f_n : E → mathbb{R}$, bounded in $L^p(E)$ for $p>1$, and pointwise converging to $f : E → mathbb{R}$ almost everywhere.
Since the sequence converge almost everywhere, consider the set $N_0$ of measure zero where the sequence does not converge, and $Esetminus N_0$ where the sequence converge. By Egorov theorem the sequence converges to $f$ uniformly on $Esetminus N_0$.
Study the convergence in $L^q(E)$ for $q∈(1,p)$:
begin{align*}
||f_n-f||_{L^q(E)}&le||f_n-f||_{L^q(N_0)}+||f_n-f||_{L^q(Esetminus N_0)} \ &le ||f_n||_{L^q(N_0)}+||f||_{L^q(N_0)}+||f_n-f||_{L^q(Esetminus N_0)}
end{align*}
I'd say that the first two norms in the rhs are $0$ since they are integrals on a set of measure $0$, but wouldn't this mean that $f_n$ converge to $f$ on $N_0$? But it is a contraddiction because we defined it as the set where the sequence does not converge, isn'it?
Moreover how to compute or bound the last norm on the rhs?
functional-analysis convergence
asked Nov 22 at 11:42
sound wave
1548
Let $Esubsetmathbb{R}^n$ be a measurable set with finite Lebesgue measure, ${f_n}_{n∈N}$ be a sequence of measurable functions $f_n : E → mathbb{R}$, bounded in $L^p(E)$ for $p>1$, and pointwise converging to $f : E → mathbb{R}$ almost everywhere.
Since the sequence converge almost everywhere, consider the set $N_0$ of measure zero where the sequence does not converge, and $Esetminus N_0$ where the sequence converge. By Egorov theorem the sequence converges to $f$ uniformly on $Esetminus N_0$.
Study the convergence in $L^q(E)$ for $q∈(1,p)$:
begin{align*}
||f_n-f||_{L^q(E)}&le||f_n-f||_{L^q(N_0)}+||f_n-f||_{L^q(Esetminus N_0)} \ &le ||f_n||_{L^q(N_0)}+||f||_{L^q(N_0)}+||f_n-f||_{L^q(Esetminus N_0)}
end{align*}
I'd say that the first two norms in the rhs are $0$ since they are integrals on a set of measure $0$, but wouldn't this mean that $f_n$ converge to $f$ on $N_0$? But it is a contraddiction because we defined it as the set where the sequence does not converge, isn'it?
Moreover how to compute or bound the last norm on the rhs?
functional-analysis convergence
functional-analysis convergence
asked Nov 22 at 11:42
sound wave
1548
asked Nov 22 at 11:42
sound wave
1548
asked Nov 22 at 11:42
sound wave
1548
asked Nov 22 at 11:42
sound wave
1548
asked Nov 22 at 11:42
sound wave
1548
1548
1
Egorov's Theorem does not say that the sequence converges uniformly on $N$. Your attempt to prove $L^{q}$ convergence completely fails.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Nov 22 at 11:45
I didnt say that Egorov theorem implies convergence on $N_0$, I obtain that from my assumptions on the values of the norm. I know I'm wrong, that's why I'm here asking for help.
– sound wave
Nov 22 at 11:57
The result you are trying ti prove is true but it has a lengthy argument. Are you familiar with uniform integrability? You have to show that ${|f_n|^{q}}$ (and hence ${|f_n-f|^{q}}$) is uniformly integrable from which $L^{q}$ convergence follows.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Nov 22 at 12:07
add a comment |
1
Egorov's Theorem does not say that the sequence converges uniformly on $N$. Your attempt to prove $L^{q}$ convergence completely fails.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Nov 22 at 11:45
I didnt say that Egorov theorem implies convergence on $N_0$, I obtain that from my assumptions on the values of the norm. I know I'm wrong, that's why I'm here asking for help.
– sound wave
Nov 22 at 11:57
The result you are trying ti prove is true but it has a lengthy argument. Are you familiar with uniform integrability? You have to show that ${|f_n|^{q}}$ (and hence ${|f_n-f|^{q}}$) is uniformly integrable from which $L^{q}$ convergence follows.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Nov 22 at 12:07
1
1
Egorov's Theorem does not say that the sequence converges uniformly on $N$. Your attempt to prove $L^{q}$ convergence completely fails.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Nov 22 at 11:45
Egorov's Theorem does not say that the sequence converges uniformly on $N$. Your attempt to prove $L^{q}$ convergence completely fails.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Nov 22 at 11:45
I didnt say that Egorov theorem implies convergence on $N_0$, I obtain that from my assumptions on the values of the norm. I know I'm wrong, that's why I'm here asking for help.
– sound wave
Nov 22 at 11:57
I didnt say that Egorov theorem implies convergence on $N_0$, I obtain that from my assumptions on the values of the norm. I know I'm wrong, that's why I'm here asking for help.
– sound wave
Nov 22 at 11:57
The result you are trying ti prove is true but it has a lengthy argument. Are you familiar with uniform integrability? You have to show that ${|f_n|^{q}}$ (and hence ${|f_n-f|^{q}}$) is uniformly integrable from which $L^{q}$ convergence follows.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Nov 22 at 12:07
The result you are trying ti prove is true but it has a lengthy argument. Are you familiar with uniform integrability? You have to show that ${|f_n|^{q}}$ (and hence ${|f_n-f|^{q}}$) is uniformly integrable from which $L^{q}$ convergence follows.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Nov 22 at 12:07
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
First, we note that Fatou's Lemma implies that $f in L^p(E)$. Now, we apply Egorov and obtain that for every $varepsilon > 0$, there exists a measurable set $M_varepsilon$ with $mu(M_varepsilon) le varepsilon$
such that $f_n$ converges uniformly to $f$ on $E setminus M_varepsilon$.
Now, we use the triangle inequality to get
$$|f_n - f|_{L^q(E)}
le |f_n - f|_{L^q(M_varepsilon)} + |f_n-f|_{L^q(Esetminus M_varepsilon)}
le |f_n - f|_{L^q(M_varepsilon)} + |f_n-f|_{L^infty(Esetminus M_varepsilon)} , mu(E)^{1/q}.$$
In the first addend, we can use Hölders inequality
(with $1/q = 1/p + 1/r$ for some $r in (1,infty)$) to obtain
$$|f_n - f|_{L^q(M_varepsilon)} le |1|_{L^r(M_varepsilon)} , |f_n - f|_{L^p(M_varepsilon)} le varepsilon^{1/r} , (|f_n|_{L^p(M_varepsilon)}+|f|_{L^p(M_varepsilon)} le C , varepsilon^{1/r}.$$
Thus,
$$|f_n - f|_{L^q(E)}
le
C , varepsilon^{1/r}
+ |f_n-f|_{L^infty(Esetminus M_varepsilon)} , mu(E)^{1/q}.$$
Hence, we can choose $N$ (depending on $varepsilon$) large enough such that
$$|f_n - f|_{L^q(E)}
le
2 , C , varepsilon^{1/r}
qquadforall n ge N.$$
Hence, $f_n to f$ in $L^q(E)$. Note that this argument also works for $q = 1$.
answered Nov 22 at 12:23
gerw
18.9k11133
1
This proof is wrong. The hypothesis only gives pointwise convergence and boundedness of $L^{p}$ norms. How did you conclude that $f_n to f$ i n $L^{p}$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Nov 22 at 23:08
1
@KaviRamaMurthy: Ups, I misread the assumptions. I will fix it.
– gerw
Nov 23 at 7:43
@gerw In the first line why did you write that the $L^q(E)$ norm of $f_n-f$ is less or equal than the sum of $L^q$ and $L^p$ norms? Should not be both $L^q$ norms?
– sound wave
Nov 27 at 12:28
1
@soundwave: Yes, both should be $L^q$ norms (changed). The second inequality using the simple bound $|g|_{L^q(C)}^q le int_C |g|^q , mathrm{d}x le |g|_{L^infty(C)}^q , mu(C)$ together with $mu(Esetminus M_varepsilon) le mu(E)$.
– gerw
Nov 27 at 14:58
1
Because $|g(x)|^q le |g|_{L^infty(C)}^q$ for a.a. $x in C$. Now you integrate this inequality over $C$. The right-hand side is a constant, hence it is multiplied by the measure of $C$.
– gerw
Nov 28 at 22:01
|
show 3 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3009035%2fnorm-of-a-function-on-a-set-of-measure-0-and-convergence-of-a-sequence-on-a-se%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
First, we note that Fatou's Lemma implies that $f in L^p(E)$. Now, we apply Egorov and obtain that for every $varepsilon > 0$, there exists a measurable set $M_varepsilon$ with $mu(M_varepsilon) le varepsilon$
such that $f_n$ converges uniformly to $f$ on $E setminus M_varepsilon$.
Now, we use the triangle inequality to get
$$|f_n - f|_{L^q(E)}
le |f_n - f|_{L^q(M_varepsilon)} + |f_n-f|_{L^q(Esetminus M_varepsilon)}
le |f_n - f|_{L^q(M_varepsilon)} + |f_n-f|_{L^infty(Esetminus M_varepsilon)} , mu(E)^{1/q}.$$
In the first addend, we can use Hölders inequality
(with $1/q = 1/p + 1/r$ for some $r in (1,infty)$) to obtain
$$|f_n - f|_{L^q(M_varepsilon)} le |1|_{L^r(M_varepsilon)} , |f_n - f|_{L^p(M_varepsilon)} le varepsilon^{1/r} , (|f_n|_{L^p(M_varepsilon)}+|f|_{L^p(M_varepsilon)} le C , varepsilon^{1/r}.$$
Thus,
$$|f_n - f|_{L^q(E)}
le
C , varepsilon^{1/r}
+ |f_n-f|_{L^infty(Esetminus M_varepsilon)} , mu(E)^{1/q}.$$
Hence, we can choose $N$ (depending on $varepsilon$) large enough such that
$$|f_n - f|_{L^q(E)}
le
2 , C , varepsilon^{1/r}
qquadforall n ge N.$$
Hence, $f_n to f$ in $L^q(E)$. Note that this argument also works for $q = 1$.
answered Nov 22 at 12:23
gerw
18.9k11133
1
This proof is wrong. The hypothesis only gives pointwise convergence and boundedness of $L^{p}$ norms. How did you conclude that $f_n to f$ i n $L^{p}$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Nov 22 at 23:08
1
@KaviRamaMurthy: Ups, I misread the assumptions. I will fix it.
– gerw
Nov 23 at 7:43
@gerw In the first line why did you write that the $L^q(E)$ norm of $f_n-f$ is less or equal than the sum of $L^q$ and $L^p$ norms? Should not be both $L^q$ norms?
– sound wave
Nov 27 at 12:28
1
@soundwave: Yes, both should be $L^q$ norms (changed). The second inequality using the simple bound $|g|_{L^q(C)}^q le int_C |g|^q , mathrm{d}x le |g|_{L^infty(C)}^q , mu(C)$ together with $mu(Esetminus M_varepsilon) le mu(E)$.
– gerw
Nov 27 at 14:58
1
Because $|g(x)|^q le |g|_{L^infty(C)}^q$ for a.a. $x in C$. Now you integrate this inequality over $C$. The right-hand side is a constant, hence it is multiplied by the measure of $C$.
– gerw
Nov 28 at 22:01
|
show 3 more comments
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
First, we note that Fatou's Lemma implies that $f in L^p(E)$. Now, we apply Egorov and obtain that for every $varepsilon > 0$, there exists a measurable set $M_varepsilon$ with $mu(M_varepsilon) le varepsilon$
such that $f_n$ converges uniformly to $f$ on $E setminus M_varepsilon$.
Now, we use the triangle inequality to get
$$|f_n - f|_{L^q(E)}
le |f_n - f|_{L^q(M_varepsilon)} + |f_n-f|_{L^q(Esetminus M_varepsilon)}
le |f_n - f|_{L^q(M_varepsilon)} + |f_n-f|_{L^infty(Esetminus M_varepsilon)} , mu(E)^{1/q}.$$
In the first addend, we can use Hölders inequality
(with $1/q = 1/p + 1/r$ for some $r in (1,infty)$) to obtain
$$|f_n - f|_{L^q(M_varepsilon)} le |1|_{L^r(M_varepsilon)} , |f_n - f|_{L^p(M_varepsilon)} le varepsilon^{1/r} , (|f_n|_{L^p(M_varepsilon)}+|f|_{L^p(M_varepsilon)} le C , varepsilon^{1/r}.$$
Thus,
$$|f_n - f|_{L^q(E)}
le
C , varepsilon^{1/r}
+ |f_n-f|_{L^infty(Esetminus M_varepsilon)} , mu(E)^{1/q}.$$
Hence, we can choose $N$ (depending on $varepsilon$) large enough such that
$$|f_n - f|_{L^q(E)}
le
2 , C , varepsilon^{1/r}
qquadforall n ge N.$$
Hence, $f_n to f$ in $L^q(E)$. Note that this argument also works for $q = 1$.
answered Nov 22 at 12:23
gerw
18.9k11133
1
This proof is wrong. The hypothesis only gives pointwise convergence and boundedness of $L^{p}$ norms. How did you conclude that $f_n to f$ i n $L^{p}$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Nov 22 at 23:08
1
@KaviRamaMurthy: Ups, I misread the assumptions. I will fix it.
– gerw
Nov 23 at 7:43
@gerw In the first line why did you write that the $L^q(E)$ norm of $f_n-f$ is less or equal than the sum of $L^q$ and $L^p$ norms? Should not be both $L^q$ norms?
– sound wave
Nov 27 at 12:28
1
@soundwave: Yes, both should be $L^q$ norms (changed). The second inequality using the simple bound $|g|_{L^q(C)}^q le int_C |g|^q , mathrm{d}x le |g|_{L^infty(C)}^q , mu(C)$ together with $mu(Esetminus M_varepsilon) le mu(E)$.
– gerw
Nov 27 at 14:58
1
Because $|g(x)|^q le |g|_{L^infty(C)}^q$ for a.a. $x in C$. Now you integrate this inequality over $C$. The right-hand side is a constant, hence it is multiplied by the measure of $C$.
– gerw
Nov 28 at 22:01
|
show 3 more comments
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
First, we note that Fatou's Lemma implies that $f in L^p(E)$. Now, we apply Egorov and obtain that for every $varepsilon > 0$, there exists a measurable set $M_varepsilon$ with $mu(M_varepsilon) le varepsilon$
such that $f_n$ converges uniformly to $f$ on $E setminus M_varepsilon$.
Now, we use the triangle inequality to get
$$|f_n - f|_{L^q(E)}
le |f_n - f|_{L^q(M_varepsilon)} + |f_n-f|_{L^q(Esetminus M_varepsilon)}
le |f_n - f|_{L^q(M_varepsilon)} + |f_n-f|_{L^infty(Esetminus M_varepsilon)} , mu(E)^{1/q}.$$
In the first addend, we can use Hölders inequality
(with $1/q = 1/p + 1/r$ for some $r in (1,infty)$) to obtain
$$|f_n - f|_{L^q(M_varepsilon)} le |1|_{L^r(M_varepsilon)} , |f_n - f|_{L^p(M_varepsilon)} le varepsilon^{1/r} , (|f_n|_{L^p(M_varepsilon)}+|f|_{L^p(M_varepsilon)} le C , varepsilon^{1/r}.$$
Thus,
$$|f_n - f|_{L^q(E)}
le
C , varepsilon^{1/r}
+ |f_n-f|_{L^infty(Esetminus M_varepsilon)} , mu(E)^{1/q}.$$
Hence, we can choose $N$ (depending on $varepsilon$) large enough such that
$$|f_n - f|_{L^q(E)}
le
2 , C , varepsilon^{1/r}
qquadforall n ge N.$$
Hence, $f_n to f$ in $L^q(E)$. Note that this argument also works for $q = 1$.
answered Nov 22 at 12:23
gerw
18.9k11133
First, we note that Fatou's Lemma implies that $f in L^p(E)$. Now, we apply Egorov and obtain that for every $varepsilon > 0$, there exists a measurable set $M_varepsilon$ with $mu(M_varepsilon) le varepsilon$
such that $f_n$ converges uniformly to $f$ on $E setminus M_varepsilon$.
Now, we use the triangle inequality to get
$$|f_n - f|_{L^q(E)}
le |f_n - f|_{L^q(M_varepsilon)} + |f_n-f|_{L^q(Esetminus M_varepsilon)}
le |f_n - f|_{L^q(M_varepsilon)} + |f_n-f|_{L^infty(Esetminus M_varepsilon)} , mu(E)^{1/q}.$$
In the first addend, we can use Hölders inequality
(with $1/q = 1/p + 1/r$ for some $r in (1,infty)$) to obtain
$$|f_n - f|_{L^q(M_varepsilon)} le |1|_{L^r(M_varepsilon)} , |f_n - f|_{L^p(M_varepsilon)} le varepsilon^{1/r} , (|f_n|_{L^p(M_varepsilon)}+|f|_{L^p(M_varepsilon)} le C , varepsilon^{1/r}.$$
Thus,
$$|f_n - f|_{L^q(E)}
le
C , varepsilon^{1/r}
+ |f_n-f|_{L^infty(Esetminus M_varepsilon)} , mu(E)^{1/q}.$$
Hence, we can choose $N$ (depending on $varepsilon$) large enough such that
$$|f_n - f|_{L^q(E)}
le
2 , C , varepsilon^{1/r}
qquadforall n ge N.$$
Hence, $f_n to f$ in $L^q(E)$. Note that this argument also works for $q = 1$.
answered Nov 22 at 12:23
gerw
18.9k11133
edited Nov 27 at 14:56
answered Nov 22 at 12:23
gerw
18.9k11133
answered Nov 22 at 12:23
gerw
18.9k11133
answered Nov 22 at 12:23
gerw
18.9k11133
18.9k11133
1
This proof is wrong. The hypothesis only gives pointwise convergence and boundedness of $L^{p}$ norms. How did you conclude that $f_n to f$ i n $L^{p}$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Nov 22 at 23:08
1
@KaviRamaMurthy: Ups, I misread the assumptions. I will fix it.
– gerw
Nov 23 at 7:43
@gerw In the first line why did you write that the $L^q(E)$ norm of $f_n-f$ is less or equal than the sum of $L^q$ and $L^p$ norms? Should not be both $L^q$ norms?
– sound wave
Nov 27 at 12:28
1
@soundwave: Yes, both should be $L^q$ norms (changed). The second inequality using the simple bound $|g|_{L^q(C)}^q le int_C |g|^q , mathrm{d}x le |g|_{L^infty(C)}^q , mu(C)$ together with $mu(Esetminus M_varepsilon) le mu(E)$.
– gerw
Nov 27 at 14:58
1
Because $|g(x)|^q le |g|_{L^infty(C)}^q$ for a.a. $x in C$. Now you integrate this inequality over $C$. The right-hand side is a constant, hence it is multiplied by the measure of $C$.
– gerw
Nov 28 at 22:01
|
show 3 more comments
1
This proof is wrong. The hypothesis only gives pointwise convergence and boundedness of $L^{p}$ norms. How did you conclude that $f_n to f$ i n $L^{p}$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Nov 22 at 23:08
1
@KaviRamaMurthy: Ups, I misread the assumptions. I will fix it.
– gerw
Nov 23 at 7:43
@gerw In the first line why did you write that the $L^q(E)$ norm of $f_n-f$ is less or equal than the sum of $L^q$ and $L^p$ norms? Should not be both $L^q$ norms?
– sound wave
Nov 27 at 12:28
1
@soundwave: Yes, both should be $L^q$ norms (changed). The second inequality using the simple bound $|g|_{L^q(C)}^q le int_C |g|^q , mathrm{d}x le |g|_{L^infty(C)}^q , mu(C)$ together with $mu(Esetminus M_varepsilon) le mu(E)$.
– gerw
Nov 27 at 14:58
1
Because $|g(x)|^q le |g|_{L^infty(C)}^q$ for a.a. $x in C$. Now you integrate this inequality over $C$. The right-hand side is a constant, hence it is multiplied by the measure of $C$.
– gerw
Nov 28 at 22:01
1
1
This proof is wrong. The hypothesis only gives pointwise convergence and boundedness of $L^{p}$ norms. How did you conclude that $f_n to f$ i n $L^{p}$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Nov 22 at 23:08
This proof is wrong. The hypothesis only gives pointwise convergence and boundedness of $L^{p}$ norms. How did you conclude that $f_n to f$ i n $L^{p}$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Nov 22 at 23:08
1
1
@KaviRamaMurthy: Ups, I misread the assumptions. I will fix it.
– gerw
Nov 23 at 7:43
@KaviRamaMurthy: Ups, I misread the assumptions. I will fix it.
– gerw
Nov 23 at 7:43
@gerw In the first line why did you write that the $L^q(E)$ norm of $f_n-f$ is less or equal than the sum of $L^q$ and $L^p$ norms? Should not be both $L^q$ norms?
– sound wave
Nov 27 at 12:28
@gerw In the first line why did you write that the $L^q(E)$ norm of $f_n-f$ is less or equal than the sum of $L^q$ and $L^p$ norms? Should not be both $L^q$ norms?
– sound wave
Nov 27 at 12:28
1
1
@soundwave: Yes, both should be $L^q$ norms (changed). The second inequality using the simple bound $|g|_{L^q(C)}^q le int_C |g|^q , mathrm{d}x le |g|_{L^infty(C)}^q , mu(C)$ together with $mu(Esetminus M_varepsilon) le mu(E)$.
– gerw
Nov 27 at 14:58
@soundwave: Yes, both should be $L^q$ norms (changed). The second inequality using the simple bound $|g|_{L^q(C)}^q le int_C |g|^q , mathrm{d}x le |g|_{L^infty(C)}^q , mu(C)$ together with $mu(Esetminus M_varepsilon) le mu(E)$.
– gerw
Nov 27 at 14:58
1
1
Because $|g(x)|^q le |g|_{L^infty(C)}^q$ for a.a. $x in C$. Now you integrate this inequality over $C$. The right-hand side is a constant, hence it is multiplied by the measure of $C$.
– gerw
Nov 28 at 22:01
Because $|g(x)|^q le |g|_{L^infty(C)}^q$ for a.a. $x in C$. Now you integrate this inequality over $C$. The right-hand side is a constant, hence it is multiplied by the measure of $C$.
– gerw
Nov 28 at 22:01
|
show 3 more comments
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3009035%2fnorm-of-a-function-on-a-set-of-measure-0-and-convergence-of-a-sequence-on-a-se%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Egorov's Theorem does not say that the sequence converges uniformly on $N$. Your attempt to prove $L^{q}$ convergence completely fails.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Nov 22 at 11:45
I didnt say that Egorov theorem implies convergence on $N_0$, I obtain that from my assumptions on the values of the norm. I know I'm wrong, that's why I'm here asking for help.
– sound wave
Nov 22 at 11:57
The result you are trying ti prove is true but it has a lengthy argument. Are you familiar with uniform integrability? You have to show that ${|f_n|^{q}}$ (and hence ${|f_n-f|^{q}}$) is uniformly integrable from which $L^{q}$ convergence follows.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Nov 22 at 12:07