If mass is doubled, how much more power is needed to sustain the same speed?











up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1












My problem involves an object completely immersed in a fluid, moving at some speed, using a certain amount of power to sustain that speed. It could be an airplane or a torpedo, among other things.



(This problem originally arose from trying to calculate certain things about ships and torpedoes, so I choose the torpedo.)



The torpedo has mass m, speed v, and power P being applied by the engine.



What I want to know is, if m is doubled, but v is the same, how does P change? I cannot find a formula for this anywhere.



(The torpedo also has exactly the same shape, so drag from water is the same.)



In other words: How much more power is needed to sustain the same speed of an object that's twice as heavy, all else being equal?





If we need concrete numbers, I'll just choose these: m = 1,000 kg, v = 10 m/s. Just let C and A be 1. Therefore drag = 50 kN and power = 500 kW.



Formulas I know:



$F_D = frac{1}{2} rho v^2 CA$



$P = frac{1}{2} rho v^3CA$



These formulas relate drag force and power to fluid density, speed, a coefficient of drag, and cross-section area. They do not involve mass (m) anywhere.



I'm confused because there are two ways of thinking about this, that I can see, that conflict with each other. On the one hand, Kinetic Energy is just half the mass times v squared. So to sustain the KE (against drag) of a doubled weight, it seems twice the power is necessary.



On the other hand, drag force in my problem is the same, so the power to overcome that force should be the same. But it doesn't make sense that you can get twice the weight "for free". It seems there must be more power needed to push it.



So I don't get it. Is there some kind of summed formula combining two ways of measuring power? I also know that power multiplied by time gives you a unit equivalent to energy. Not sure if this is a clue or not.



Since speed is the same, Reynolds number is the same, so hopefully we should be able to avoid "complex fluid dynamics things."










share|cite|improve this question
























  • There is power required to maintain your kinetic energy, which depends on mass. The fluid effects, such as drag, only depend on the shape and size of your object. The mass of your object does not influence the flow field.
    – Drew
    Dec 1 at 21:35















up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1












My problem involves an object completely immersed in a fluid, moving at some speed, using a certain amount of power to sustain that speed. It could be an airplane or a torpedo, among other things.



(This problem originally arose from trying to calculate certain things about ships and torpedoes, so I choose the torpedo.)



The torpedo has mass m, speed v, and power P being applied by the engine.



What I want to know is, if m is doubled, but v is the same, how does P change? I cannot find a formula for this anywhere.



(The torpedo also has exactly the same shape, so drag from water is the same.)



In other words: How much more power is needed to sustain the same speed of an object that's twice as heavy, all else being equal?





If we need concrete numbers, I'll just choose these: m = 1,000 kg, v = 10 m/s. Just let C and A be 1. Therefore drag = 50 kN and power = 500 kW.



Formulas I know:



$F_D = frac{1}{2} rho v^2 CA$



$P = frac{1}{2} rho v^3CA$



These formulas relate drag force and power to fluid density, speed, a coefficient of drag, and cross-section area. They do not involve mass (m) anywhere.



I'm confused because there are two ways of thinking about this, that I can see, that conflict with each other. On the one hand, Kinetic Energy is just half the mass times v squared. So to sustain the KE (against drag) of a doubled weight, it seems twice the power is necessary.



On the other hand, drag force in my problem is the same, so the power to overcome that force should be the same. But it doesn't make sense that you can get twice the weight "for free". It seems there must be more power needed to push it.



So I don't get it. Is there some kind of summed formula combining two ways of measuring power? I also know that power multiplied by time gives you a unit equivalent to energy. Not sure if this is a clue or not.



Since speed is the same, Reynolds number is the same, so hopefully we should be able to avoid "complex fluid dynamics things."










share|cite|improve this question
























  • There is power required to maintain your kinetic energy, which depends on mass. The fluid effects, such as drag, only depend on the shape and size of your object. The mass of your object does not influence the flow field.
    – Drew
    Dec 1 at 21:35













up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1






1





My problem involves an object completely immersed in a fluid, moving at some speed, using a certain amount of power to sustain that speed. It could be an airplane or a torpedo, among other things.



(This problem originally arose from trying to calculate certain things about ships and torpedoes, so I choose the torpedo.)



The torpedo has mass m, speed v, and power P being applied by the engine.



What I want to know is, if m is doubled, but v is the same, how does P change? I cannot find a formula for this anywhere.



(The torpedo also has exactly the same shape, so drag from water is the same.)



In other words: How much more power is needed to sustain the same speed of an object that's twice as heavy, all else being equal?





If we need concrete numbers, I'll just choose these: m = 1,000 kg, v = 10 m/s. Just let C and A be 1. Therefore drag = 50 kN and power = 500 kW.



Formulas I know:



$F_D = frac{1}{2} rho v^2 CA$



$P = frac{1}{2} rho v^3CA$



These formulas relate drag force and power to fluid density, speed, a coefficient of drag, and cross-section area. They do not involve mass (m) anywhere.



I'm confused because there are two ways of thinking about this, that I can see, that conflict with each other. On the one hand, Kinetic Energy is just half the mass times v squared. So to sustain the KE (against drag) of a doubled weight, it seems twice the power is necessary.



On the other hand, drag force in my problem is the same, so the power to overcome that force should be the same. But it doesn't make sense that you can get twice the weight "for free". It seems there must be more power needed to push it.



So I don't get it. Is there some kind of summed formula combining two ways of measuring power? I also know that power multiplied by time gives you a unit equivalent to energy. Not sure if this is a clue or not.



Since speed is the same, Reynolds number is the same, so hopefully we should be able to avoid "complex fluid dynamics things."










share|cite|improve this question















My problem involves an object completely immersed in a fluid, moving at some speed, using a certain amount of power to sustain that speed. It could be an airplane or a torpedo, among other things.



(This problem originally arose from trying to calculate certain things about ships and torpedoes, so I choose the torpedo.)



The torpedo has mass m, speed v, and power P being applied by the engine.



What I want to know is, if m is doubled, but v is the same, how does P change? I cannot find a formula for this anywhere.



(The torpedo also has exactly the same shape, so drag from water is the same.)



In other words: How much more power is needed to sustain the same speed of an object that's twice as heavy, all else being equal?





If we need concrete numbers, I'll just choose these: m = 1,000 kg, v = 10 m/s. Just let C and A be 1. Therefore drag = 50 kN and power = 500 kW.



Formulas I know:



$F_D = frac{1}{2} rho v^2 CA$



$P = frac{1}{2} rho v^3CA$



These formulas relate drag force and power to fluid density, speed, a coefficient of drag, and cross-section area. They do not involve mass (m) anywhere.



I'm confused because there are two ways of thinking about this, that I can see, that conflict with each other. On the one hand, Kinetic Energy is just half the mass times v squared. So to sustain the KE (against drag) of a doubled weight, it seems twice the power is necessary.



On the other hand, drag force in my problem is the same, so the power to overcome that force should be the same. But it doesn't make sense that you can get twice the weight "for free". It seems there must be more power needed to push it.



So I don't get it. Is there some kind of summed formula combining two ways of measuring power? I also know that power multiplied by time gives you a unit equivalent to energy. Not sure if this is a clue or not.



Since speed is the same, Reynolds number is the same, so hopefully we should be able to avoid "complex fluid dynamics things."







classical-mechanics fluid-dynamics kinematics power






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 1 at 21:52

























asked Dec 1 at 21:27









DrZ214

303515




303515












  • There is power required to maintain your kinetic energy, which depends on mass. The fluid effects, such as drag, only depend on the shape and size of your object. The mass of your object does not influence the flow field.
    – Drew
    Dec 1 at 21:35


















  • There is power required to maintain your kinetic energy, which depends on mass. The fluid effects, such as drag, only depend on the shape and size of your object. The mass of your object does not influence the flow field.
    – Drew
    Dec 1 at 21:35
















There is power required to maintain your kinetic energy, which depends on mass. The fluid effects, such as drag, only depend on the shape and size of your object. The mass of your object does not influence the flow field.
– Drew
Dec 1 at 21:35




There is power required to maintain your kinetic energy, which depends on mass. The fluid effects, such as drag, only depend on the shape and size of your object. The mass of your object does not influence the flow field.
– Drew
Dec 1 at 21:35










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote














On the one hand, Kinetic Energy is just half the mass times v squared. So to sustain the KE of a doubled weight, it seems twice the power is necessary.




That's the most common misconception about Newtonian mechanics, by far. In Newtonian mechanics, in the absence of any forces, objects will just continue moving with the same velocity. But there's a stubbornly persistent misconception that it "costs force" to keep the momentum the same. People will say that an object stops moving because it "runs out of force".



You're doing the same thing, but instead of mixing up momentum with force you're mixing up energy with power. Having high energy doesn't require high power. A rock standing on a high ledge has a lot of gravitational potential energy, and that doesn't cost any power at all. It just sits there.



Similarly, it costs more energy to get a heavier object moving, but once it is moving, that doesn't matter. The power needed to keep it going is simply $P = Fv$, and if the velocities $v$ are the same, and the drag forces $F$ are the same, then the powers are the same.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • In Newtonian mechanics, in the absence of any forces, objects will just continue moving with the same velocity. Right, I understand the first law. What I meant was sustaining the KE against the drag force, which I just figured needed some power to pump in energy to the KE to increase it, whereas drag pumps in energy to decrease it. I should make an edit.
    – DrZ214
    Dec 1 at 21:41








  • 1




    @DrZ214 The drag force is associated with a negative power $Fv = -rho v^3 CA/2$. To keep it going at the same speed, you need to put in positive power $+rho v^3 CA/2$.
    – knzhou
    Dec 1 at 21:42


















up vote
1
down vote














These formulas relate drag force and power to fluid density, speed, a
coefficient of drag, and cross-section area. They do not involve mass
(m) anywhere.




They don't because they don't need to.



As the torpedoes travel at constant speed $v$, there is no net force acting on them (2nd Law of Newton): the drag force exerted by the water equals the trust delivered by the motor, in both cases.



Since as the drag force does not depend on the mass of the torpedo, only on the shape of the torpedo, the viscosity of the water and the torpedo's speed $v$, the power is invariant of the torpedo mass.



Mass comes into pay to determine the amount of energy needed to accelerate the torpedoes from $0$ to $v$ but that is not the situation here: there is no acceleration in play.






share|cite|improve this answer






























    up vote
    1
    down vote













    When calculating the power required to keep the torpedo at the same speed, you're actually calculating how the kinetic energy is changing over time due to the drag force. This quantity doesn't have any dependence on the total kinetic energy of the torpedo, in the same way that the lines $10-x$ and $100-x$ have the same slope. It only depends on the force. Since the force to be overcome is the same, the required power is the same.



    What might be confusing you is the following: it will indeed take roughly twice as much energy to accelerate the torpedo from rest to the speed v if the mass was doubled. But once it is already at that speed, the amount of power required to keep the torpedo moving at speed v is the same.






    share|cite|improve this answer























    • *it will indeed take twice as much energy to accelerate the torpedo from rest to the speed v if the mass was doubled. * Only if you disregard the drag.
      – Gert
      Dec 1 at 21:53










    • @Gert That is correct. The real ratio depends on what exactly the accelerating forces are in each case, and it's only exactly twice if the acceleration is the same in each case.
      – probably_someone
      Dec 1 at 21:56













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "151"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f444554%2fif-mass-is-doubled-how-much-more-power-is-needed-to-sustain-the-same-speed%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    2
    down vote














    On the one hand, Kinetic Energy is just half the mass times v squared. So to sustain the KE of a doubled weight, it seems twice the power is necessary.




    That's the most common misconception about Newtonian mechanics, by far. In Newtonian mechanics, in the absence of any forces, objects will just continue moving with the same velocity. But there's a stubbornly persistent misconception that it "costs force" to keep the momentum the same. People will say that an object stops moving because it "runs out of force".



    You're doing the same thing, but instead of mixing up momentum with force you're mixing up energy with power. Having high energy doesn't require high power. A rock standing on a high ledge has a lot of gravitational potential energy, and that doesn't cost any power at all. It just sits there.



    Similarly, it costs more energy to get a heavier object moving, but once it is moving, that doesn't matter. The power needed to keep it going is simply $P = Fv$, and if the velocities $v$ are the same, and the drag forces $F$ are the same, then the powers are the same.






    share|cite|improve this answer























    • In Newtonian mechanics, in the absence of any forces, objects will just continue moving with the same velocity. Right, I understand the first law. What I meant was sustaining the KE against the drag force, which I just figured needed some power to pump in energy to the KE to increase it, whereas drag pumps in energy to decrease it. I should make an edit.
      – DrZ214
      Dec 1 at 21:41








    • 1




      @DrZ214 The drag force is associated with a negative power $Fv = -rho v^3 CA/2$. To keep it going at the same speed, you need to put in positive power $+rho v^3 CA/2$.
      – knzhou
      Dec 1 at 21:42















    up vote
    2
    down vote














    On the one hand, Kinetic Energy is just half the mass times v squared. So to sustain the KE of a doubled weight, it seems twice the power is necessary.




    That's the most common misconception about Newtonian mechanics, by far. In Newtonian mechanics, in the absence of any forces, objects will just continue moving with the same velocity. But there's a stubbornly persistent misconception that it "costs force" to keep the momentum the same. People will say that an object stops moving because it "runs out of force".



    You're doing the same thing, but instead of mixing up momentum with force you're mixing up energy with power. Having high energy doesn't require high power. A rock standing on a high ledge has a lot of gravitational potential energy, and that doesn't cost any power at all. It just sits there.



    Similarly, it costs more energy to get a heavier object moving, but once it is moving, that doesn't matter. The power needed to keep it going is simply $P = Fv$, and if the velocities $v$ are the same, and the drag forces $F$ are the same, then the powers are the same.






    share|cite|improve this answer























    • In Newtonian mechanics, in the absence of any forces, objects will just continue moving with the same velocity. Right, I understand the first law. What I meant was sustaining the KE against the drag force, which I just figured needed some power to pump in energy to the KE to increase it, whereas drag pumps in energy to decrease it. I should make an edit.
      – DrZ214
      Dec 1 at 21:41








    • 1




      @DrZ214 The drag force is associated with a negative power $Fv = -rho v^3 CA/2$. To keep it going at the same speed, you need to put in positive power $+rho v^3 CA/2$.
      – knzhou
      Dec 1 at 21:42













    up vote
    2
    down vote










    up vote
    2
    down vote










    On the one hand, Kinetic Energy is just half the mass times v squared. So to sustain the KE of a doubled weight, it seems twice the power is necessary.




    That's the most common misconception about Newtonian mechanics, by far. In Newtonian mechanics, in the absence of any forces, objects will just continue moving with the same velocity. But there's a stubbornly persistent misconception that it "costs force" to keep the momentum the same. People will say that an object stops moving because it "runs out of force".



    You're doing the same thing, but instead of mixing up momentum with force you're mixing up energy with power. Having high energy doesn't require high power. A rock standing on a high ledge has a lot of gravitational potential energy, and that doesn't cost any power at all. It just sits there.



    Similarly, it costs more energy to get a heavier object moving, but once it is moving, that doesn't matter. The power needed to keep it going is simply $P = Fv$, and if the velocities $v$ are the same, and the drag forces $F$ are the same, then the powers are the same.






    share|cite|improve this answer















    On the one hand, Kinetic Energy is just half the mass times v squared. So to sustain the KE of a doubled weight, it seems twice the power is necessary.




    That's the most common misconception about Newtonian mechanics, by far. In Newtonian mechanics, in the absence of any forces, objects will just continue moving with the same velocity. But there's a stubbornly persistent misconception that it "costs force" to keep the momentum the same. People will say that an object stops moving because it "runs out of force".



    You're doing the same thing, but instead of mixing up momentum with force you're mixing up energy with power. Having high energy doesn't require high power. A rock standing on a high ledge has a lot of gravitational potential energy, and that doesn't cost any power at all. It just sits there.



    Similarly, it costs more energy to get a heavier object moving, but once it is moving, that doesn't matter. The power needed to keep it going is simply $P = Fv$, and if the velocities $v$ are the same, and the drag forces $F$ are the same, then the powers are the same.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited Dec 1 at 21:40

























    answered Dec 1 at 21:34









    knzhou

    40.1k11113194




    40.1k11113194












    • In Newtonian mechanics, in the absence of any forces, objects will just continue moving with the same velocity. Right, I understand the first law. What I meant was sustaining the KE against the drag force, which I just figured needed some power to pump in energy to the KE to increase it, whereas drag pumps in energy to decrease it. I should make an edit.
      – DrZ214
      Dec 1 at 21:41








    • 1




      @DrZ214 The drag force is associated with a negative power $Fv = -rho v^3 CA/2$. To keep it going at the same speed, you need to put in positive power $+rho v^3 CA/2$.
      – knzhou
      Dec 1 at 21:42


















    • In Newtonian mechanics, in the absence of any forces, objects will just continue moving with the same velocity. Right, I understand the first law. What I meant was sustaining the KE against the drag force, which I just figured needed some power to pump in energy to the KE to increase it, whereas drag pumps in energy to decrease it. I should make an edit.
      – DrZ214
      Dec 1 at 21:41








    • 1




      @DrZ214 The drag force is associated with a negative power $Fv = -rho v^3 CA/2$. To keep it going at the same speed, you need to put in positive power $+rho v^3 CA/2$.
      – knzhou
      Dec 1 at 21:42
















    In Newtonian mechanics, in the absence of any forces, objects will just continue moving with the same velocity. Right, I understand the first law. What I meant was sustaining the KE against the drag force, which I just figured needed some power to pump in energy to the KE to increase it, whereas drag pumps in energy to decrease it. I should make an edit.
    – DrZ214
    Dec 1 at 21:41






    In Newtonian mechanics, in the absence of any forces, objects will just continue moving with the same velocity. Right, I understand the first law. What I meant was sustaining the KE against the drag force, which I just figured needed some power to pump in energy to the KE to increase it, whereas drag pumps in energy to decrease it. I should make an edit.
    – DrZ214
    Dec 1 at 21:41






    1




    1




    @DrZ214 The drag force is associated with a negative power $Fv = -rho v^3 CA/2$. To keep it going at the same speed, you need to put in positive power $+rho v^3 CA/2$.
    – knzhou
    Dec 1 at 21:42




    @DrZ214 The drag force is associated with a negative power $Fv = -rho v^3 CA/2$. To keep it going at the same speed, you need to put in positive power $+rho v^3 CA/2$.
    – knzhou
    Dec 1 at 21:42










    up vote
    1
    down vote














    These formulas relate drag force and power to fluid density, speed, a
    coefficient of drag, and cross-section area. They do not involve mass
    (m) anywhere.




    They don't because they don't need to.



    As the torpedoes travel at constant speed $v$, there is no net force acting on them (2nd Law of Newton): the drag force exerted by the water equals the trust delivered by the motor, in both cases.



    Since as the drag force does not depend on the mass of the torpedo, only on the shape of the torpedo, the viscosity of the water and the torpedo's speed $v$, the power is invariant of the torpedo mass.



    Mass comes into pay to determine the amount of energy needed to accelerate the torpedoes from $0$ to $v$ but that is not the situation here: there is no acceleration in play.






    share|cite|improve this answer



























      up vote
      1
      down vote














      These formulas relate drag force and power to fluid density, speed, a
      coefficient of drag, and cross-section area. They do not involve mass
      (m) anywhere.




      They don't because they don't need to.



      As the torpedoes travel at constant speed $v$, there is no net force acting on them (2nd Law of Newton): the drag force exerted by the water equals the trust delivered by the motor, in both cases.



      Since as the drag force does not depend on the mass of the torpedo, only on the shape of the torpedo, the viscosity of the water and the torpedo's speed $v$, the power is invariant of the torpedo mass.



      Mass comes into pay to determine the amount of energy needed to accelerate the torpedoes from $0$ to $v$ but that is not the situation here: there is no acceleration in play.






      share|cite|improve this answer

























        up vote
        1
        down vote










        up vote
        1
        down vote










        These formulas relate drag force and power to fluid density, speed, a
        coefficient of drag, and cross-section area. They do not involve mass
        (m) anywhere.




        They don't because they don't need to.



        As the torpedoes travel at constant speed $v$, there is no net force acting on them (2nd Law of Newton): the drag force exerted by the water equals the trust delivered by the motor, in both cases.



        Since as the drag force does not depend on the mass of the torpedo, only on the shape of the torpedo, the viscosity of the water and the torpedo's speed $v$, the power is invariant of the torpedo mass.



        Mass comes into pay to determine the amount of energy needed to accelerate the torpedoes from $0$ to $v$ but that is not the situation here: there is no acceleration in play.






        share|cite|improve this answer















        These formulas relate drag force and power to fluid density, speed, a
        coefficient of drag, and cross-section area. They do not involve mass
        (m) anywhere.




        They don't because they don't need to.



        As the torpedoes travel at constant speed $v$, there is no net force acting on them (2nd Law of Newton): the drag force exerted by the water equals the trust delivered by the motor, in both cases.



        Since as the drag force does not depend on the mass of the torpedo, only on the shape of the torpedo, the viscosity of the water and the torpedo's speed $v$, the power is invariant of the torpedo mass.



        Mass comes into pay to determine the amount of energy needed to accelerate the torpedoes from $0$ to $v$ but that is not the situation here: there is no acceleration in play.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Dec 1 at 21:51

























        answered Dec 1 at 21:37









        Gert

        17.4k32957




        17.4k32957






















            up vote
            1
            down vote













            When calculating the power required to keep the torpedo at the same speed, you're actually calculating how the kinetic energy is changing over time due to the drag force. This quantity doesn't have any dependence on the total kinetic energy of the torpedo, in the same way that the lines $10-x$ and $100-x$ have the same slope. It only depends on the force. Since the force to be overcome is the same, the required power is the same.



            What might be confusing you is the following: it will indeed take roughly twice as much energy to accelerate the torpedo from rest to the speed v if the mass was doubled. But once it is already at that speed, the amount of power required to keep the torpedo moving at speed v is the same.






            share|cite|improve this answer























            • *it will indeed take twice as much energy to accelerate the torpedo from rest to the speed v if the mass was doubled. * Only if you disregard the drag.
              – Gert
              Dec 1 at 21:53










            • @Gert That is correct. The real ratio depends on what exactly the accelerating forces are in each case, and it's only exactly twice if the acceleration is the same in each case.
              – probably_someone
              Dec 1 at 21:56

















            up vote
            1
            down vote













            When calculating the power required to keep the torpedo at the same speed, you're actually calculating how the kinetic energy is changing over time due to the drag force. This quantity doesn't have any dependence on the total kinetic energy of the torpedo, in the same way that the lines $10-x$ and $100-x$ have the same slope. It only depends on the force. Since the force to be overcome is the same, the required power is the same.



            What might be confusing you is the following: it will indeed take roughly twice as much energy to accelerate the torpedo from rest to the speed v if the mass was doubled. But once it is already at that speed, the amount of power required to keep the torpedo moving at speed v is the same.






            share|cite|improve this answer























            • *it will indeed take twice as much energy to accelerate the torpedo from rest to the speed v if the mass was doubled. * Only if you disregard the drag.
              – Gert
              Dec 1 at 21:53










            • @Gert That is correct. The real ratio depends on what exactly the accelerating forces are in each case, and it's only exactly twice if the acceleration is the same in each case.
              – probably_someone
              Dec 1 at 21:56















            up vote
            1
            down vote










            up vote
            1
            down vote









            When calculating the power required to keep the torpedo at the same speed, you're actually calculating how the kinetic energy is changing over time due to the drag force. This quantity doesn't have any dependence on the total kinetic energy of the torpedo, in the same way that the lines $10-x$ and $100-x$ have the same slope. It only depends on the force. Since the force to be overcome is the same, the required power is the same.



            What might be confusing you is the following: it will indeed take roughly twice as much energy to accelerate the torpedo from rest to the speed v if the mass was doubled. But once it is already at that speed, the amount of power required to keep the torpedo moving at speed v is the same.






            share|cite|improve this answer














            When calculating the power required to keep the torpedo at the same speed, you're actually calculating how the kinetic energy is changing over time due to the drag force. This quantity doesn't have any dependence on the total kinetic energy of the torpedo, in the same way that the lines $10-x$ and $100-x$ have the same slope. It only depends on the force. Since the force to be overcome is the same, the required power is the same.



            What might be confusing you is the following: it will indeed take roughly twice as much energy to accelerate the torpedo from rest to the speed v if the mass was doubled. But once it is already at that speed, the amount of power required to keep the torpedo moving at speed v is the same.







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Dec 1 at 21:56

























            answered Dec 1 at 21:38









            probably_someone

            16.1k12554




            16.1k12554












            • *it will indeed take twice as much energy to accelerate the torpedo from rest to the speed v if the mass was doubled. * Only if you disregard the drag.
              – Gert
              Dec 1 at 21:53










            • @Gert That is correct. The real ratio depends on what exactly the accelerating forces are in each case, and it's only exactly twice if the acceleration is the same in each case.
              – probably_someone
              Dec 1 at 21:56




















            • *it will indeed take twice as much energy to accelerate the torpedo from rest to the speed v if the mass was doubled. * Only if you disregard the drag.
              – Gert
              Dec 1 at 21:53










            • @Gert That is correct. The real ratio depends on what exactly the accelerating forces are in each case, and it's only exactly twice if the acceleration is the same in each case.
              – probably_someone
              Dec 1 at 21:56


















            *it will indeed take twice as much energy to accelerate the torpedo from rest to the speed v if the mass was doubled. * Only if you disregard the drag.
            – Gert
            Dec 1 at 21:53




            *it will indeed take twice as much energy to accelerate the torpedo from rest to the speed v if the mass was doubled. * Only if you disregard the drag.
            – Gert
            Dec 1 at 21:53












            @Gert That is correct. The real ratio depends on what exactly the accelerating forces are in each case, and it's only exactly twice if the acceleration is the same in each case.
            – probably_someone
            Dec 1 at 21:56






            @Gert That is correct. The real ratio depends on what exactly the accelerating forces are in each case, and it's only exactly twice if the acceleration is the same in each case.
            – probably_someone
            Dec 1 at 21:56




















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f444554%2fif-mass-is-doubled-how-much-more-power-is-needed-to-sustain-the-same-speed%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Quarter-circle Tiles

            build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

            Mont Emei