$mid f^{(n)} (t) mid leq frac{M(n!)^s}{R^n}$ then $1/f$ has the same property
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
A friend of mine asked me the following problem :
Let $s in [1,infty)$ and $T > 0$.
We say that a function $f in C^{infty}([0,T], mathbb{R})$ is in $mathcal{K}^s(0,T)$ iff there is $M, R > 0$ such that :
$$mid f^{(n)}(t) mid leq frac{M(n!)^s}{R^n}, forall n in mathbb{N}, t in [0,T]$$
Consider a function $g$ such that $g in mathcal{K}^s(0,T)$ and such that there is $delta > 0$ such that $g(t) geq delta, forall t in [0,T]$then prove that $frac{1}{g} in mathcal{K}^s(0,T)$
I don’t know how to approach this problem. The assumption made on $g$ are difficult to understand intuitively. We understand that it means that $g$ is extremely regular but then how can I conclude that $1/g$ has the same property.
An idea is to use binomial theorem to expand the derivative but it doesn’t really work since the expression of $(1/g)^{(n)}$ depend on some of the derivative of $1/g$.
calculus real-analysis integration sequences-and-series functions
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
A friend of mine asked me the following problem :
Let $s in [1,infty)$ and $T > 0$.
We say that a function $f in C^{infty}([0,T], mathbb{R})$ is in $mathcal{K}^s(0,T)$ iff there is $M, R > 0$ such that :
$$mid f^{(n)}(t) mid leq frac{M(n!)^s}{R^n}, forall n in mathbb{N}, t in [0,T]$$
Consider a function $g$ such that $g in mathcal{K}^s(0,T)$ and such that there is $delta > 0$ such that $g(t) geq delta, forall t in [0,T]$then prove that $frac{1}{g} in mathcal{K}^s(0,T)$
I don’t know how to approach this problem. The assumption made on $g$ are difficult to understand intuitively. We understand that it means that $g$ is extremely regular but then how can I conclude that $1/g$ has the same property.
An idea is to use binomial theorem to expand the derivative but it doesn’t really work since the expression of $(1/g)^{(n)}$ depend on some of the derivative of $1/g$.
calculus real-analysis integration sequences-and-series functions
$1/g$ could be unbounded if $g=0$ at some point?
– MisterRiemann
Nov 22 at 20:41
@MisterRiemann Yes thank you for noticing, I forgot an assumption. Now it’s ok.
– Interesting problems
Nov 22 at 20:45
1
For a slightly more general version of this assertion, check out Theorem 2.9 (p.14) of this thesis.
– MisterRiemann
Nov 22 at 20:47
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
A friend of mine asked me the following problem :
Let $s in [1,infty)$ and $T > 0$.
We say that a function $f in C^{infty}([0,T], mathbb{R})$ is in $mathcal{K}^s(0,T)$ iff there is $M, R > 0$ such that :
$$mid f^{(n)}(t) mid leq frac{M(n!)^s}{R^n}, forall n in mathbb{N}, t in [0,T]$$
Consider a function $g$ such that $g in mathcal{K}^s(0,T)$ and such that there is $delta > 0$ such that $g(t) geq delta, forall t in [0,T]$then prove that $frac{1}{g} in mathcal{K}^s(0,T)$
I don’t know how to approach this problem. The assumption made on $g$ are difficult to understand intuitively. We understand that it means that $g$ is extremely regular but then how can I conclude that $1/g$ has the same property.
An idea is to use binomial theorem to expand the derivative but it doesn’t really work since the expression of $(1/g)^{(n)}$ depend on some of the derivative of $1/g$.
calculus real-analysis integration sequences-and-series functions
A friend of mine asked me the following problem :
Let $s in [1,infty)$ and $T > 0$.
We say that a function $f in C^{infty}([0,T], mathbb{R})$ is in $mathcal{K}^s(0,T)$ iff there is $M, R > 0$ such that :
$$mid f^{(n)}(t) mid leq frac{M(n!)^s}{R^n}, forall n in mathbb{N}, t in [0,T]$$
Consider a function $g$ such that $g in mathcal{K}^s(0,T)$ and such that there is $delta > 0$ such that $g(t) geq delta, forall t in [0,T]$then prove that $frac{1}{g} in mathcal{K}^s(0,T)$
I don’t know how to approach this problem. The assumption made on $g$ are difficult to understand intuitively. We understand that it means that $g$ is extremely regular but then how can I conclude that $1/g$ has the same property.
An idea is to use binomial theorem to expand the derivative but it doesn’t really work since the expression of $(1/g)^{(n)}$ depend on some of the derivative of $1/g$.
calculus real-analysis integration sequences-and-series functions
calculus real-analysis integration sequences-and-series functions
edited Nov 22 at 20:44
asked Nov 22 at 20:38
Interesting problems
13310
13310
$1/g$ could be unbounded if $g=0$ at some point?
– MisterRiemann
Nov 22 at 20:41
@MisterRiemann Yes thank you for noticing, I forgot an assumption. Now it’s ok.
– Interesting problems
Nov 22 at 20:45
1
For a slightly more general version of this assertion, check out Theorem 2.9 (p.14) of this thesis.
– MisterRiemann
Nov 22 at 20:47
add a comment |
$1/g$ could be unbounded if $g=0$ at some point?
– MisterRiemann
Nov 22 at 20:41
@MisterRiemann Yes thank you for noticing, I forgot an assumption. Now it’s ok.
– Interesting problems
Nov 22 at 20:45
1
For a slightly more general version of this assertion, check out Theorem 2.9 (p.14) of this thesis.
– MisterRiemann
Nov 22 at 20:47
$1/g$ could be unbounded if $g=0$ at some point?
– MisterRiemann
Nov 22 at 20:41
$1/g$ could be unbounded if $g=0$ at some point?
– MisterRiemann
Nov 22 at 20:41
@MisterRiemann Yes thank you for noticing, I forgot an assumption. Now it’s ok.
– Interesting problems
Nov 22 at 20:45
@MisterRiemann Yes thank you for noticing, I forgot an assumption. Now it’s ok.
– Interesting problems
Nov 22 at 20:45
1
1
For a slightly more general version of this assertion, check out Theorem 2.9 (p.14) of this thesis.
– MisterRiemann
Nov 22 at 20:47
For a slightly more general version of this assertion, check out Theorem 2.9 (p.14) of this thesis.
– MisterRiemann
Nov 22 at 20:47
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3009630%2fmid-fn-t-mid-leq-fracmnsrn-then-1-f-has-the-same-propert%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3009630%2fmid-fn-t-mid-leq-fracmnsrn-then-1-f-has-the-same-propert%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$1/g$ could be unbounded if $g=0$ at some point?
– MisterRiemann
Nov 22 at 20:41
@MisterRiemann Yes thank you for noticing, I forgot an assumption. Now it’s ok.
– Interesting problems
Nov 22 at 20:45
1
For a slightly more general version of this assertion, check out Theorem 2.9 (p.14) of this thesis.
– MisterRiemann
Nov 22 at 20:47