$zeta(1+it)=0$ implies sum of prime if finite?
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Can anyone explain why $zeta(1+it)= sum_{n=1}^{infty} frac{1}{n^{1+it}}=0$ will imply $sum_{text{p prime}} frac{1-Re(-p^{-it})}{p}< infty?$
Here is what I have so far:
We know $zeta(s)$ does not have any zeros for $Re(s) geq 1.$ So $zeta(1+it) not=0.$
Thus, we have,
$sum_{text{p prime}}frac{1-Re(-p^{-it})}{p}= sum_{text{p prime}} frac{1}{p}- sum_{text{p prime}}frac{Re(-p^{-it})}{p}$.
The first sum is known to be infinite and the second one ressembles $zeta(1+it).$ However, I dont know how to conclude the whole sum is infinite.
analytic-number-theory
asked Nov 20 at 19:47
usere5225321
612412
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Can anyone explain why $zeta(1+it)= sum_{n=1}^{infty} frac{1}{n^{1+it}}=0$ will imply $sum_{text{p prime}} frac{1-Re(-p^{-it})}{p}< infty?$
Here is what I have so far:
We know $zeta(s)$ does not have any zeros for $Re(s) geq 1.$ So $zeta(1+it) not=0.$
Thus, we have,
$sum_{text{p prime}}frac{1-Re(-p^{-it})}{p}= sum_{text{p prime}} frac{1}{p}- sum_{text{p prime}}frac{Re(-p^{-it})}{p}$.
The first sum is known to be infinite and the second one ressembles $zeta(1+it).$ However, I dont know how to conclude the whole sum is infinite.
analytic-number-theory
asked Nov 20 at 19:47
usere5225321
612412
It's surely because $zeta(1+it)$ is never zero.
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Nov 20 at 19:58
@LordSharktheUnknown question edited !
– usere5225321
Nov 20 at 20:09
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Can anyone explain why $zeta(1+it)= sum_{n=1}^{infty} frac{1}{n^{1+it}}=0$ will imply $sum_{text{p prime}} frac{1-Re(-p^{-it})}{p}< infty?$
Here is what I have so far:
We know $zeta(s)$ does not have any zeros for $Re(s) geq 1.$ So $zeta(1+it) not=0.$
Thus, we have,
$sum_{text{p prime}}frac{1-Re(-p^{-it})}{p}= sum_{text{p prime}} frac{1}{p}- sum_{text{p prime}}frac{Re(-p^{-it})}{p}$.
The first sum is known to be infinite and the second one ressembles $zeta(1+it).$ However, I dont know how to conclude the whole sum is infinite.
analytic-number-theory
asked Nov 20 at 19:47
usere5225321
612412
Can anyone explain why $zeta(1+it)= sum_{n=1}^{infty} frac{1}{n^{1+it}}=0$ will imply $sum_{text{p prime}} frac{1-Re(-p^{-it})}{p}< infty?$
Here is what I have so far:
We know $zeta(s)$ does not have any zeros for $Re(s) geq 1.$ So $zeta(1+it) not=0.$
Thus, we have,
$sum_{text{p prime}}frac{1-Re(-p^{-it})}{p}= sum_{text{p prime}} frac{1}{p}- sum_{text{p prime}}frac{Re(-p^{-it})}{p}$.
The first sum is known to be infinite and the second one ressembles $zeta(1+it).$ However, I dont know how to conclude the whole sum is infinite.
analytic-number-theory
analytic-number-theory
asked Nov 20 at 19:47
usere5225321
612412
asked Nov 20 at 19:47
usere5225321
612412
edited Nov 20 at 20:09
asked Nov 20 at 19:47
usere5225321
612412
asked Nov 20 at 19:47
usere5225321
612412
asked Nov 20 at 19:47
usere5225321
612412
612412
It's surely because $zeta(1+it)$ is never zero.
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Nov 20 at 19:58
@LordSharktheUnknown question edited !
– usere5225321
Nov 20 at 20:09
add a comment |
It's surely because $zeta(1+it)$ is never zero.
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Nov 20 at 19:58
@LordSharktheUnknown question edited !
– usere5225321
Nov 20 at 20:09
It's surely because $zeta(1+it)$ is never zero.
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Nov 20 at 19:58
It's surely because $zeta(1+it)$ is never zero.
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Nov 20 at 19:58
@LordSharktheUnknown question edited !
– usere5225321
Nov 20 at 20:09
@LordSharktheUnknown question edited !
– usere5225321
Nov 20 at 20:09
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006797%2fzeta1it-0-implies-sum-of-prime-if-finite%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
It's surely because $zeta(1+it)$ is never zero.
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Nov 20 at 19:58
@LordSharktheUnknown question edited !
– usere5225321
Nov 20 at 20:09