How to properly align Tikz pictures in Latex fraction environment











up vote
3
down vote

favorite
1












How to properly align Tikz pictures in Latex environment to get the following picture?



enter image description here



My trial code does not compile,



documentclass[preview]{standalone}
usepackage{tikz}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}

begin{equation*}
A = frac{%
begin{tikzpicture}
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
end{tikzpicture}
}{%
begin{tikzpicture}
defL{1.0}
matrix[column sep=.1cm, row sep=2mm]
{
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (L,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
&
node at (0,0) {$-$};
&
draw[dashed] (0,0) -- (L,0);
draw[xshift=L cm] (0,0) to[bend left] (L,0) to[bend left] (0,0); \
};
end{tikzpicture}
}
end{equation*}

end{document}









share|improve this question
























  • please, extend your code fragment to complete small document ...
    – Zarko
    4 hours ago

















up vote
3
down vote

favorite
1












How to properly align Tikz pictures in Latex environment to get the following picture?



enter image description here



My trial code does not compile,



documentclass[preview]{standalone}
usepackage{tikz}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}

begin{equation*}
A = frac{%
begin{tikzpicture}
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
end{tikzpicture}
}{%
begin{tikzpicture}
defL{1.0}
matrix[column sep=.1cm, row sep=2mm]
{
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (L,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
&
node at (0,0) {$-$};
&
draw[dashed] (0,0) -- (L,0);
draw[xshift=L cm] (0,0) to[bend left] (L,0) to[bend left] (0,0); \
};
end{tikzpicture}
}
end{equation*}

end{document}









share|improve this question
























  • please, extend your code fragment to complete small document ...
    – Zarko
    4 hours ago















up vote
3
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
3
down vote

favorite
1






1





How to properly align Tikz pictures in Latex environment to get the following picture?



enter image description here



My trial code does not compile,



documentclass[preview]{standalone}
usepackage{tikz}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}

begin{equation*}
A = frac{%
begin{tikzpicture}
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
end{tikzpicture}
}{%
begin{tikzpicture}
defL{1.0}
matrix[column sep=.1cm, row sep=2mm]
{
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (L,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
&
node at (0,0) {$-$};
&
draw[dashed] (0,0) -- (L,0);
draw[xshift=L cm] (0,0) to[bend left] (L,0) to[bend left] (0,0); \
};
end{tikzpicture}
}
end{equation*}

end{document}









share|improve this question















How to properly align Tikz pictures in Latex environment to get the following picture?



enter image description here



My trial code does not compile,



documentclass[preview]{standalone}
usepackage{tikz}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}

begin{equation*}
A = frac{%
begin{tikzpicture}
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
end{tikzpicture}
}{%
begin{tikzpicture}
defL{1.0}
matrix[column sep=.1cm, row sep=2mm]
{
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (L,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
&
node at (0,0) {$-$};
&
draw[dashed] (0,0) -- (L,0);
draw[xshift=L cm] (0,0) to[bend left] (L,0) to[bend left] (0,0); \
};
end{tikzpicture}
}
end{equation*}

end{document}






tikz-pgf amsmath fractions alignment






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 hours ago

























asked 5 hours ago









Kevin Powell

1656




1656












  • please, extend your code fragment to complete small document ...
    – Zarko
    4 hours ago




















  • please, extend your code fragment to complete small document ...
    – Zarko
    4 hours ago


















please, extend your code fragment to complete small document ...
– Zarko
4 hours ago






please, extend your code fragment to complete small document ...
– Zarko
4 hours ago












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
3
down vote



accepted










Generally you can control the vertical alignment with the baseline option.



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}
begin{equation*}
A = frac{%
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(0,-0.1)}]
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
end{tikzpicture}
}{%
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(0,-0.1)}]
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
end{tikzpicture}
-
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(0,-0.1)}]
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
draw[dashed](0,0) -- (-1,0);
end{tikzpicture}
}
end{equation*}

end{document}


enter image description here



I don't know what these objects represent, so you may want to use another baseline.



Note that you can use a TikZ matrix:



documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}

begin{equation*}
A = frac{%
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline]
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
end{tikzpicture}
}{%
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline]
defL{1.0}
matrix[column sep=.1cm, row sep=2mm,ampersand replacement=&]
{
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (L,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
&
node at (0,0) {$-$};
&
draw[dashed] (0,0) -- (L,0);
draw[xshift=L cm] (0,0) to[bend left] (L,0) to[bend left] (0,0); \
};
end{tikzpicture}
}
end{equation*}

end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer























  • Thanks! It seems that the more versatile matrix in tikzpicture does not work with frac. Although baseline is one answer to this figure, it will become difficult to deal with multiple rows of figure in the denominator.
    – Kevin Powell
    1 hour ago










  • @KevinPowell You can definitely use a matrix, just add ampersand replacement=& and replace & by &.
    – marmot
    18 mins ago


















up vote
4
down vote













documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}

begin{document}
[
A = frac{tikz[baseline=1pt]{draw (-1.5,0) to[bend left] (-0.5,0) to[bend left] (-1.5,0);}}
{tikz{draw (-1.5,0) to[bend left] (-0.5,0) to[bend left] (-1.5,0)
( 0.5,0) to[bend left] ( 1.5,0) to[bend left] ( 0.5,0);
draw[dashed, shorten >=1mm, shorten <=1mm] (-0.5,0) -- (0.5,0);}
}
]
end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer























  • How is that different from my answer except that you define M but do not use it? The only thing apart from the unused definition I can see is the use of baseline, which is precisely what I am using.
    – marmot
    4 hours ago










  • @marmot the denominator is different. I think there's an error here, because the minus is missing.
    – CarLaTeX
    3 hours ago






  • 2




    I would create a pic for the shapes, and suggest to use dots instead of dashes, which could be confused with the minus (@marmot, too).
    – CarLaTeX
    3 hours ago










  • @CarLaTeX That's a brilliant idea!
    – Kevin Powell
    1 hour ago










  • @KevinPowell Thank you :)
    – CarLaTeX
    1 hour ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f466042%2fhow-to-properly-align-tikz-pictures-in-latex-fraction-environment%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
3
down vote



accepted










Generally you can control the vertical alignment with the baseline option.



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}
begin{equation*}
A = frac{%
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(0,-0.1)}]
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
end{tikzpicture}
}{%
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(0,-0.1)}]
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
end{tikzpicture}
-
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(0,-0.1)}]
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
draw[dashed](0,0) -- (-1,0);
end{tikzpicture}
}
end{equation*}

end{document}


enter image description here



I don't know what these objects represent, so you may want to use another baseline.



Note that you can use a TikZ matrix:



documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}

begin{equation*}
A = frac{%
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline]
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
end{tikzpicture}
}{%
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline]
defL{1.0}
matrix[column sep=.1cm, row sep=2mm,ampersand replacement=&]
{
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (L,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
&
node at (0,0) {$-$};
&
draw[dashed] (0,0) -- (L,0);
draw[xshift=L cm] (0,0) to[bend left] (L,0) to[bend left] (0,0); \
};
end{tikzpicture}
}
end{equation*}

end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer























  • Thanks! It seems that the more versatile matrix in tikzpicture does not work with frac. Although baseline is one answer to this figure, it will become difficult to deal with multiple rows of figure in the denominator.
    – Kevin Powell
    1 hour ago










  • @KevinPowell You can definitely use a matrix, just add ampersand replacement=& and replace & by &.
    – marmot
    18 mins ago















up vote
3
down vote



accepted










Generally you can control the vertical alignment with the baseline option.



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}
begin{equation*}
A = frac{%
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(0,-0.1)}]
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
end{tikzpicture}
}{%
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(0,-0.1)}]
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
end{tikzpicture}
-
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(0,-0.1)}]
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
draw[dashed](0,0) -- (-1,0);
end{tikzpicture}
}
end{equation*}

end{document}


enter image description here



I don't know what these objects represent, so you may want to use another baseline.



Note that you can use a TikZ matrix:



documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}

begin{equation*}
A = frac{%
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline]
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
end{tikzpicture}
}{%
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline]
defL{1.0}
matrix[column sep=.1cm, row sep=2mm,ampersand replacement=&]
{
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (L,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
&
node at (0,0) {$-$};
&
draw[dashed] (0,0) -- (L,0);
draw[xshift=L cm] (0,0) to[bend left] (L,0) to[bend left] (0,0); \
};
end{tikzpicture}
}
end{equation*}

end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer























  • Thanks! It seems that the more versatile matrix in tikzpicture does not work with frac. Although baseline is one answer to this figure, it will become difficult to deal with multiple rows of figure in the denominator.
    – Kevin Powell
    1 hour ago










  • @KevinPowell You can definitely use a matrix, just add ampersand replacement=& and replace & by &.
    – marmot
    18 mins ago













up vote
3
down vote



accepted







up vote
3
down vote



accepted






Generally you can control the vertical alignment with the baseline option.



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}
begin{equation*}
A = frac{%
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(0,-0.1)}]
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
end{tikzpicture}
}{%
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(0,-0.1)}]
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
end{tikzpicture}
-
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(0,-0.1)}]
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
draw[dashed](0,0) -- (-1,0);
end{tikzpicture}
}
end{equation*}

end{document}


enter image description here



I don't know what these objects represent, so you may want to use another baseline.



Note that you can use a TikZ matrix:



documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}

begin{equation*}
A = frac{%
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline]
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
end{tikzpicture}
}{%
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline]
defL{1.0}
matrix[column sep=.1cm, row sep=2mm,ampersand replacement=&]
{
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (L,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
&
node at (0,0) {$-$};
&
draw[dashed] (0,0) -- (L,0);
draw[xshift=L cm] (0,0) to[bend left] (L,0) to[bend left] (0,0); \
};
end{tikzpicture}
}
end{equation*}

end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer














Generally you can control the vertical alignment with the baseline option.



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}
begin{equation*}
A = frac{%
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(0,-0.1)}]
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
end{tikzpicture}
}{%
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(0,-0.1)}]
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
end{tikzpicture}
-
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(0,-0.1)}]
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
draw[dashed](0,0) -- (-1,0);
end{tikzpicture}
}
end{equation*}

end{document}


enter image description here



I don't know what these objects represent, so you may want to use another baseline.



Note that you can use a TikZ matrix:



documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}

begin{equation*}
A = frac{%
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline]
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
end{tikzpicture}
}{%
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline]
defL{1.0}
matrix[column sep=.1cm, row sep=2mm,ampersand replacement=&]
{
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (L,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
&
node at (0,0) {$-$};
&
draw[dashed] (0,0) -- (L,0);
draw[xshift=L cm] (0,0) to[bend left] (L,0) to[bend left] (0,0); \
};
end{tikzpicture}
}
end{equation*}

end{document}


enter image description here







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 14 mins ago

























answered 4 hours ago









marmot

83.4k493178




83.4k493178












  • Thanks! It seems that the more versatile matrix in tikzpicture does not work with frac. Although baseline is one answer to this figure, it will become difficult to deal with multiple rows of figure in the denominator.
    – Kevin Powell
    1 hour ago










  • @KevinPowell You can definitely use a matrix, just add ampersand replacement=& and replace & by &.
    – marmot
    18 mins ago


















  • Thanks! It seems that the more versatile matrix in tikzpicture does not work with frac. Although baseline is one answer to this figure, it will become difficult to deal with multiple rows of figure in the denominator.
    – Kevin Powell
    1 hour ago










  • @KevinPowell You can definitely use a matrix, just add ampersand replacement=& and replace & by &.
    – marmot
    18 mins ago
















Thanks! It seems that the more versatile matrix in tikzpicture does not work with frac. Although baseline is one answer to this figure, it will become difficult to deal with multiple rows of figure in the denominator.
– Kevin Powell
1 hour ago




Thanks! It seems that the more versatile matrix in tikzpicture does not work with frac. Although baseline is one answer to this figure, it will become difficult to deal with multiple rows of figure in the denominator.
– Kevin Powell
1 hour ago












@KevinPowell You can definitely use a matrix, just add ampersand replacement=& and replace & by &.
– marmot
18 mins ago




@KevinPowell You can definitely use a matrix, just add ampersand replacement=& and replace & by &.
– marmot
18 mins ago










up vote
4
down vote













documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}

begin{document}
[
A = frac{tikz[baseline=1pt]{draw (-1.5,0) to[bend left] (-0.5,0) to[bend left] (-1.5,0);}}
{tikz{draw (-1.5,0) to[bend left] (-0.5,0) to[bend left] (-1.5,0)
( 0.5,0) to[bend left] ( 1.5,0) to[bend left] ( 0.5,0);
draw[dashed, shorten >=1mm, shorten <=1mm] (-0.5,0) -- (0.5,0);}
}
]
end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer























  • How is that different from my answer except that you define M but do not use it? The only thing apart from the unused definition I can see is the use of baseline, which is precisely what I am using.
    – marmot
    4 hours ago










  • @marmot the denominator is different. I think there's an error here, because the minus is missing.
    – CarLaTeX
    3 hours ago






  • 2




    I would create a pic for the shapes, and suggest to use dots instead of dashes, which could be confused with the minus (@marmot, too).
    – CarLaTeX
    3 hours ago










  • @CarLaTeX That's a brilliant idea!
    – Kevin Powell
    1 hour ago










  • @KevinPowell Thank you :)
    – CarLaTeX
    1 hour ago















up vote
4
down vote













documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}

begin{document}
[
A = frac{tikz[baseline=1pt]{draw (-1.5,0) to[bend left] (-0.5,0) to[bend left] (-1.5,0);}}
{tikz{draw (-1.5,0) to[bend left] (-0.5,0) to[bend left] (-1.5,0)
( 0.5,0) to[bend left] ( 1.5,0) to[bend left] ( 0.5,0);
draw[dashed, shorten >=1mm, shorten <=1mm] (-0.5,0) -- (0.5,0);}
}
]
end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer























  • How is that different from my answer except that you define M but do not use it? The only thing apart from the unused definition I can see is the use of baseline, which is precisely what I am using.
    – marmot
    4 hours ago










  • @marmot the denominator is different. I think there's an error here, because the minus is missing.
    – CarLaTeX
    3 hours ago






  • 2




    I would create a pic for the shapes, and suggest to use dots instead of dashes, which could be confused with the minus (@marmot, too).
    – CarLaTeX
    3 hours ago










  • @CarLaTeX That's a brilliant idea!
    – Kevin Powell
    1 hour ago










  • @KevinPowell Thank you :)
    – CarLaTeX
    1 hour ago













up vote
4
down vote










up vote
4
down vote









documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}

begin{document}
[
A = frac{tikz[baseline=1pt]{draw (-1.5,0) to[bend left] (-0.5,0) to[bend left] (-1.5,0);}}
{tikz{draw (-1.5,0) to[bend left] (-0.5,0) to[bend left] (-1.5,0)
( 0.5,0) to[bend left] ( 1.5,0) to[bend left] ( 0.5,0);
draw[dashed, shorten >=1mm, shorten <=1mm] (-0.5,0) -- (0.5,0);}
}
]
end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer














documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}

begin{document}
[
A = frac{tikz[baseline=1pt]{draw (-1.5,0) to[bend left] (-0.5,0) to[bend left] (-1.5,0);}}
{tikz{draw (-1.5,0) to[bend left] (-0.5,0) to[bend left] (-1.5,0)
( 0.5,0) to[bend left] ( 1.5,0) to[bend left] ( 0.5,0);
draw[dashed, shorten >=1mm, shorten <=1mm] (-0.5,0) -- (0.5,0);}
}
]
end{document}


enter image description here







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 45 mins ago

























answered 4 hours ago









Zarko

119k865155




119k865155












  • How is that different from my answer except that you define M but do not use it? The only thing apart from the unused definition I can see is the use of baseline, which is precisely what I am using.
    – marmot
    4 hours ago










  • @marmot the denominator is different. I think there's an error here, because the minus is missing.
    – CarLaTeX
    3 hours ago






  • 2




    I would create a pic for the shapes, and suggest to use dots instead of dashes, which could be confused with the minus (@marmot, too).
    – CarLaTeX
    3 hours ago










  • @CarLaTeX That's a brilliant idea!
    – Kevin Powell
    1 hour ago










  • @KevinPowell Thank you :)
    – CarLaTeX
    1 hour ago


















  • How is that different from my answer except that you define M but do not use it? The only thing apart from the unused definition I can see is the use of baseline, which is precisely what I am using.
    – marmot
    4 hours ago










  • @marmot the denominator is different. I think there's an error here, because the minus is missing.
    – CarLaTeX
    3 hours ago






  • 2




    I would create a pic for the shapes, and suggest to use dots instead of dashes, which could be confused with the minus (@marmot, too).
    – CarLaTeX
    3 hours ago










  • @CarLaTeX That's a brilliant idea!
    – Kevin Powell
    1 hour ago










  • @KevinPowell Thank you :)
    – CarLaTeX
    1 hour ago
















How is that different from my answer except that you define M but do not use it? The only thing apart from the unused definition I can see is the use of baseline, which is precisely what I am using.
– marmot
4 hours ago




How is that different from my answer except that you define M but do not use it? The only thing apart from the unused definition I can see is the use of baseline, which is precisely what I am using.
– marmot
4 hours ago












@marmot the denominator is different. I think there's an error here, because the minus is missing.
– CarLaTeX
3 hours ago




@marmot the denominator is different. I think there's an error here, because the minus is missing.
– CarLaTeX
3 hours ago




2




2




I would create a pic for the shapes, and suggest to use dots instead of dashes, which could be confused with the minus (@marmot, too).
– CarLaTeX
3 hours ago




I would create a pic for the shapes, and suggest to use dots instead of dashes, which could be confused with the minus (@marmot, too).
– CarLaTeX
3 hours ago












@CarLaTeX That's a brilliant idea!
– Kevin Powell
1 hour ago




@CarLaTeX That's a brilliant idea!
– Kevin Powell
1 hour ago












@KevinPowell Thank you :)
– CarLaTeX
1 hour ago




@KevinPowell Thank you :)
– CarLaTeX
1 hour ago


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f466042%2fhow-to-properly-align-tikz-pictures-in-latex-fraction-environment%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Ellipse (mathématiques)

Quarter-circle Tiles

Mont Emei