When does $f(t) to 0$ as $t to 0$ imply that $f(t_n) to 0$ as $n to infty$ for a sequence $t_n to 0$?











up vote
-1
down vote

favorite
1












Let $Fcolon X to mathbb{R}$ be a function on a Hilbert space. When does the existence of the limit
$$F(t) to 0 text{ as $t to 0$}$$
imply that, for a sequence $t_n to 0$,
$$F(t_n) to 0 text{ as $n to infty$}?$$



How can I show this?






sequences-and-series limits







share|cite|improve this question






















  • Just Definition.
    – xbh
    Nov 22 at 13:23















up vote
-1
down vote

favorite
1












Let $Fcolon X to mathbb{R}$ be a function on a Hilbert space. When does the existence of the limit
$$F(t) to 0 text{ as $t to 0$}$$
imply that, for a sequence $t_n to 0$,
$$F(t_n) to 0 text{ as $n to infty$}?$$



How can I show this?






sequences-and-series limits







share|cite|improve this question






















  • Just Definition.
    – xbh
    Nov 22 at 13:23













up vote
-1
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
-1
down vote

favorite
1






1





Let $Fcolon X to mathbb{R}$ be a function on a Hilbert space. When does the existence of the limit
$$F(t) to 0 text{ as $t to 0$}$$
imply that, for a sequence $t_n to 0$,
$$F(t_n) to 0 text{ as $n to infty$}?$$



How can I show this?






sequences-and-series limits







share|cite|improve this question













Let $Fcolon X to mathbb{R}$ be a function on a Hilbert space. When does the existence of the limit
$$F(t) to 0 text{ as $t to 0$}$$
imply that, for a sequence $t_n to 0$,
$$F(t_n) to 0 text{ as $n to infty$}?$$



How can I show this?






sequences-and-series limits




sequences-and-series limits






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 22 at 13:20









StopUsingFacebook

1858




1858












  • Just Definition.
    – xbh
    Nov 22 at 13:23


















  • Just Definition.
    – xbh
    Nov 22 at 13:23
















Just Definition.
– xbh
Nov 22 at 13:23




Just Definition.
– xbh
Nov 22 at 13:23










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote



accepted










Always.



The existence of the first limit can be written as:




For every $epsilon$, there exists some $delta$ such that if $|t|<delta$, then $|f(t)|<epsilon$





in the second case, we assume that the following is true:




For every $epsilon$, there exists some $N$ such that if $n>N$, then $|t_n| < epsilon$




and we are asking if the following is true:




For every $epsilon > 0$, there exists some $N$ such that if $n>N$, then $|F(t_n)| < epsilon$.





You can probably already see that the definitions are very similar. So similar, in fact, that the proof should probably just follow the definitions. So, start with the old standard "Let $epsilon > 0$", and see where that takes you.






share|cite|improve this answer




























    up vote
    1
    down vote













    Let $F(t) to 0 text{ as $t to 0$}$. This means:



    for every $epsilon >0$ there is $ delta >0$ such that $t in X$ and $||t||< delta$ imply that $|F(x)|< epsilon$.



    Now let $(t_n)$ be a sequence in $X$ such that $t_n to 0$. Let $epsilon>0$ and let $ delta $ as above. Then there is $N$ such that $||t_n||< delta$ for all $n>N$.



    Hence $|F(t_n)|< epsilon$ for all $n>N$. This gives $ F(t_n) to 0 text{ as $n to infty$}$






    share|cite|improve this answer





















      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3009123%2fwhen-does-ft-to-0-as-t-to-0-imply-that-ft-n-to-0-as-n-to-infty%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      2
      down vote



      accepted










      Always.



      The existence of the first limit can be written as:




      For every $epsilon$, there exists some $delta$ such that if $|t|<delta$, then $|f(t)|<epsilon$





      in the second case, we assume that the following is true:




      For every $epsilon$, there exists some $N$ such that if $n>N$, then $|t_n| < epsilon$




      and we are asking if the following is true:




      For every $epsilon > 0$, there exists some $N$ such that if $n>N$, then $|F(t_n)| < epsilon$.





      You can probably already see that the definitions are very similar. So similar, in fact, that the proof should probably just follow the definitions. So, start with the old standard "Let $epsilon > 0$", and see where that takes you.






      share|cite|improve this answer

























        up vote
        2
        down vote



        accepted










        Always.



        The existence of the first limit can be written as:




        For every $epsilon$, there exists some $delta$ such that if $|t|<delta$, then $|f(t)|<epsilon$





        in the second case, we assume that the following is true:




        For every $epsilon$, there exists some $N$ such that if $n>N$, then $|t_n| < epsilon$




        and we are asking if the following is true:




        For every $epsilon > 0$, there exists some $N$ such that if $n>N$, then $|F(t_n)| < epsilon$.





        You can probably already see that the definitions are very similar. So similar, in fact, that the proof should probably just follow the definitions. So, start with the old standard "Let $epsilon > 0$", and see where that takes you.






        share|cite|improve this answer























          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted






          Always.



          The existence of the first limit can be written as:




          For every $epsilon$, there exists some $delta$ such that if $|t|<delta$, then $|f(t)|<epsilon$





          in the second case, we assume that the following is true:




          For every $epsilon$, there exists some $N$ such that if $n>N$, then $|t_n| < epsilon$




          and we are asking if the following is true:




          For every $epsilon > 0$, there exists some $N$ such that if $n>N$, then $|F(t_n)| < epsilon$.





          You can probably already see that the definitions are very similar. So similar, in fact, that the proof should probably just follow the definitions. So, start with the old standard "Let $epsilon > 0$", and see where that takes you.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          Always.



          The existence of the first limit can be written as:




          For every $epsilon$, there exists some $delta$ such that if $|t|<delta$, then $|f(t)|<epsilon$





          in the second case, we assume that the following is true:




          For every $epsilon$, there exists some $N$ such that if $n>N$, then $|t_n| < epsilon$




          and we are asking if the following is true:




          For every $epsilon > 0$, there exists some $N$ such that if $n>N$, then $|F(t_n)| < epsilon$.





          You can probably already see that the definitions are very similar. So similar, in fact, that the proof should probably just follow the definitions. So, start with the old standard "Let $epsilon > 0$", and see where that takes you.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Nov 22 at 13:26









          5xum

          89.4k393161




          89.4k393161






















              up vote
              1
              down vote













              Let $F(t) to 0 text{ as $t to 0$}$. This means:



              for every $epsilon >0$ there is $ delta >0$ such that $t in X$ and $||t||< delta$ imply that $|F(x)|< epsilon$.



              Now let $(t_n)$ be a sequence in $X$ such that $t_n to 0$. Let $epsilon>0$ and let $ delta $ as above. Then there is $N$ such that $||t_n||< delta$ for all $n>N$.



              Hence $|F(t_n)|< epsilon$ for all $n>N$. This gives $ F(t_n) to 0 text{ as $n to infty$}$






              share|cite|improve this answer

























                up vote
                1
                down vote













                Let $F(t) to 0 text{ as $t to 0$}$. This means:



                for every $epsilon >0$ there is $ delta >0$ such that $t in X$ and $||t||< delta$ imply that $|F(x)|< epsilon$.



                Now let $(t_n)$ be a sequence in $X$ such that $t_n to 0$. Let $epsilon>0$ and let $ delta $ as above. Then there is $N$ such that $||t_n||< delta$ for all $n>N$.



                Hence $|F(t_n)|< epsilon$ for all $n>N$. This gives $ F(t_n) to 0 text{ as $n to infty$}$






                share|cite|improve this answer























                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote









                  Let $F(t) to 0 text{ as $t to 0$}$. This means:



                  for every $epsilon >0$ there is $ delta >0$ such that $t in X$ and $||t||< delta$ imply that $|F(x)|< epsilon$.



                  Now let $(t_n)$ be a sequence in $X$ such that $t_n to 0$. Let $epsilon>0$ and let $ delta $ as above. Then there is $N$ such that $||t_n||< delta$ for all $n>N$.



                  Hence $|F(t_n)|< epsilon$ for all $n>N$. This gives $ F(t_n) to 0 text{ as $n to infty$}$






                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  Let $F(t) to 0 text{ as $t to 0$}$. This means:



                  for every $epsilon >0$ there is $ delta >0$ such that $t in X$ and $||t||< delta$ imply that $|F(x)|< epsilon$.



                  Now let $(t_n)$ be a sequence in $X$ such that $t_n to 0$. Let $epsilon>0$ and let $ delta $ as above. Then there is $N$ such that $||t_n||< delta$ for all $n>N$.



                  Hence $|F(t_n)|< epsilon$ for all $n>N$. This gives $ F(t_n) to 0 text{ as $n to infty$}$







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Nov 22 at 13:28









                  Fred

                  43.6k1644




                  43.6k1644






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid …



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                      Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                      Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid …



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3009123%2fwhen-does-ft-to-0-as-t-to-0-imply-that-ft-n-to-0-as-n-to-infty%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      -

                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Ellipse (mathématiques)

                      Image
                      Pour les articles homonymes, voir Ellipse. L'ellipse est le lieu des points dont la somme des distances à deux points fixes, dits foyers, est constante. Section du cône ou projection du cercle. En géométrie, une ellipse est une courbe plane fermée obtenue par l’intersection d’un cône de révolution avec un plan, à condition que celui-ci coupe l'axe de rotation du cône ou du cylindre : c'est une conique d'excentricité strictement comprise entre 0 et 1. On peut également la définir comme le lieu des points dont la somme des distances à deux points fixes, dits foyers, est constante (sa construction par la méthode du jardinier est très simple). Dans la vie courante, l’ellipse est la forme qu'on perçoit en regardant un cercle en perspective, ou la figure formée par l’ombre d'un disque sur une surface plane. On retrouve aussi, en première approximation [ 1 ] , des ellipses dans les trajectoires des corps célestes (planètes, comètes ou satellites arti...
                      Read more

                      Quarter-circle Tiles

                      Image
                      up vote 0 down vote favorite I have $99$ identical square tiles, each with a quarter-circle drawn on it like this: [asy] size(1.5cm); draw(Arc((2,0),1,90,180),red+1); draw((0,0)--(2,0)--(2,2)--(0,2)--(0,0)); [/asy] When I arrange the tiles in a $9times 11$ rectangular grid, each with a random orientation, what is the expected value of the number of full circles I form? I think this problem has to do with finding the chance any given 2x2 square has a circle, but I can't find it. expected-value share | cite | improve this question asked Nov 20 at 15:03 6minecraftninja 1 2 ...
                      Read more

                      Mont Emei

                      Image
                      Mont Emei.mw-parser-output .entete.map{background-image:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7a/Picto_infobox_map.png")} Vue du sommet Wanfo du mont Emei Géographie Altitude 3 099  m , Wanfo Coordonnées 29° 31′ 11″ nord, 103° 19′ 57″ est Administration Pays   Chine Province Sichuan Ville-préfecture Leshan Géolocalisation sur la carte : Sichuan Mont Emei Géolocalisation sur la carte : Chine Mont Emei modifier   Paysage panoramique du mont Emei, incluant le paysage panoramique du grand Bouddha de Leshan *   Patrimoine mondial de l'UNESCO Passerelle en bois sur le versant ouest Pays   Chine Subdivision Sichuan Type Mixte Critères (iv) (vi) (x) Superficie 15 400 ha Numéro d’identification 779 Zone géographique Asie et Pacifique  ** Année d’inscription 1996 (20 e session) * Descriptif officiel UNESCO ** Classification géog...
                      Read more