Ubuntu on an Asus EEE PC 4G (701)
I'm a new user to Ubuntu, but having installed it on my main laptop I found that I really like the UI and the usability.
I have an Asus eee PC 4G that's been sitting spare for a few years now and would love to be able to get Ubuntu installed on it but I'm unsure on what distro to pick for it as when I tried with the same version I put on my main laptop it came up with a CPU compatibility error.
So any help is really appreciated.
asus eeepc
add a comment |
I'm a new user to Ubuntu, but having installed it on my main laptop I found that I really like the UI and the usability.
I have an Asus eee PC 4G that's been sitting spare for a few years now and would love to be able to get Ubuntu installed on it but I'm unsure on what distro to pick for it as when I tried with the same version I put on my main laptop it came up with a CPU compatibility error.
So any help is really appreciated.
asus eeepc
add a comment |
I'm a new user to Ubuntu, but having installed it on my main laptop I found that I really like the UI and the usability.
I have an Asus eee PC 4G that's been sitting spare for a few years now and would love to be able to get Ubuntu installed on it but I'm unsure on what distro to pick for it as when I tried with the same version I put on my main laptop it came up with a CPU compatibility error.
So any help is really appreciated.
asus eeepc
I'm a new user to Ubuntu, but having installed it on my main laptop I found that I really like the UI and the usability.
I have an Asus eee PC 4G that's been sitting spare for a few years now and would love to be able to get Ubuntu installed on it but I'm unsure on what distro to pick for it as when I tried with the same version I put on my main laptop it came up with a CPU compatibility error.
So any help is really appreciated.
asus eeepc
asus eeepc
asked Feb 8 '14 at 19:25
Pyrotequila
2112
2112
add a comment |
add a comment |
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
For the EEE 701 I have tried a lot of different versions of Ubuntu. Now I am very content with the "Peppermint ICE" version.
The connections go very good and you still can add a lot of functional apps.
So try it!
Let me now.
add a comment |
For the benefit of other nostalgic owners of the (old but still cute) Eee PC.
After some fight, today (2018/12/8) I managed to install Lubuntu 12-04 on my Eee PC 4G, portuguese keyboard and all.
What I learned:
The oficial repository seems to be broken but this mirror is up: https://phillw.net/isos/lubuntu/precise/
The alternate installers of versions 16.04 and 12.04 won't install.
The desktop versions of 14-04 and 16.04 won't work al all.
The desktop installer of 12.04 works but when trying to install complains about the SDD being smaller than 4.4GB. The trick to overcome this was to plug in a pendrive with more than 4.4GB and then it installed by default on the internal SDD with 1GB still to spare.
An alternative is to create a persistent live system in the 4 GB SSD in your eeePC. The main image is compressed (from the iso file), and there will be more drive space available for extra program packages and your own data files (to be saved in thecasper-rw
file or partition). mkusb creates persistent live drives withcasper-rw
partitions for 14.04 and newer versions. You can use Unetbootin to create a persistent live drive with acasper-rw
file for Lubuntu 12.04 (I tested Unetbootin version 667 in Lubuntu 18.04.1 LTS).
– sudodus
Dec 9 at 0:01
I have installed Xubuntu 14.04 LTS in a friend's eeePC 900. This is a full installation which works in that computer with a 9 GB SSD.
– sudodus
Dec 9 at 0:07
add a comment |
Try the following link http://www.eeebuntu.org/release/eeebuntu or as another option would be maybe a netbook remix version of ubuntu on one of the archive versions. I did this a while ago and used an image unpacked onto an SD card to perform the install, after some settings changes in the BIOS (had to flash new BIOS version) to change the boot order it was pretty simple.
I made a USB installer from the release on that site, but it still will not try to boot from the USB, it just boots to desktop and opens it in a file explorer. I seem to have changed the boot order in the BIOS, but it still just loads the desktop... frustrating!
– Pyrotequila
Feb 9 '14 at 14:42
1
The link is broken
– GunJack
May 23 '16 at 4:27
add a comment |
Is the architecture version you tried 64bit? For a EEE PC 701 4G, you need to install the 32bit version.
You don't say what version Ubuntu you tried. I have had 10.04 running for a few years now, and have previously booted 12.04 as a LiveUSB.
add a comment |
Since it just have 512MB ram. I would advise against running the regular Ubuntu - Unity, Gnome or KDE version. It would be better to use lightweight version like Lubuntu, Xubuntu and Ubuntu. Your eeePC has a 32 bit processor, so try installing 32-bit version of these distributions. The best choice would be Lubuntu 14.04.4 LTS. Download Here
add a comment |
If I remember correctly, that machine uses a Celeron M processor that does not support Physical Address Extensions (PAE), so the error you were likely getting was something like, "This kernel requires the following features not present on the CPU: pae."
You will need a 32 bit distribution that supports non-pae processors, which is getting harder to find. You might try reading this article for wisdom on getting Lubuntu or Xubuntu working on this machine. However it did not run very well the last time I tried it. I ended up trying to use bodhi Linux, which i believe still has a non-pae supporting kernel available. I also gave puppy Linux a good run, but that one doesn't like to be installed, but rather run as a bootable live image.
If you are feeling particularly crafty, I've heard talked of folks getting arch Linux working on these. You will have to pull out your best Google foo for that one though.
Good luck!
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f418246%2fubuntu-on-an-asus-eee-pc-4g-701%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
For the EEE 701 I have tried a lot of different versions of Ubuntu. Now I am very content with the "Peppermint ICE" version.
The connections go very good and you still can add a lot of functional apps.
So try it!
Let me now.
add a comment |
For the EEE 701 I have tried a lot of different versions of Ubuntu. Now I am very content with the "Peppermint ICE" version.
The connections go very good and you still can add a lot of functional apps.
So try it!
Let me now.
add a comment |
For the EEE 701 I have tried a lot of different versions of Ubuntu. Now I am very content with the "Peppermint ICE" version.
The connections go very good and you still can add a lot of functional apps.
So try it!
Let me now.
For the EEE 701 I have tried a lot of different versions of Ubuntu. Now I am very content with the "Peppermint ICE" version.
The connections go very good and you still can add a lot of functional apps.
So try it!
Let me now.
answered May 30 '14 at 17:49
WF Maan
111
111
add a comment |
add a comment |
For the benefit of other nostalgic owners of the (old but still cute) Eee PC.
After some fight, today (2018/12/8) I managed to install Lubuntu 12-04 on my Eee PC 4G, portuguese keyboard and all.
What I learned:
The oficial repository seems to be broken but this mirror is up: https://phillw.net/isos/lubuntu/precise/
The alternate installers of versions 16.04 and 12.04 won't install.
The desktop versions of 14-04 and 16.04 won't work al all.
The desktop installer of 12.04 works but when trying to install complains about the SDD being smaller than 4.4GB. The trick to overcome this was to plug in a pendrive with more than 4.4GB and then it installed by default on the internal SDD with 1GB still to spare.
An alternative is to create a persistent live system in the 4 GB SSD in your eeePC. The main image is compressed (from the iso file), and there will be more drive space available for extra program packages and your own data files (to be saved in thecasper-rw
file or partition). mkusb creates persistent live drives withcasper-rw
partitions for 14.04 and newer versions. You can use Unetbootin to create a persistent live drive with acasper-rw
file for Lubuntu 12.04 (I tested Unetbootin version 667 in Lubuntu 18.04.1 LTS).
– sudodus
Dec 9 at 0:01
I have installed Xubuntu 14.04 LTS in a friend's eeePC 900. This is a full installation which works in that computer with a 9 GB SSD.
– sudodus
Dec 9 at 0:07
add a comment |
For the benefit of other nostalgic owners of the (old but still cute) Eee PC.
After some fight, today (2018/12/8) I managed to install Lubuntu 12-04 on my Eee PC 4G, portuguese keyboard and all.
What I learned:
The oficial repository seems to be broken but this mirror is up: https://phillw.net/isos/lubuntu/precise/
The alternate installers of versions 16.04 and 12.04 won't install.
The desktop versions of 14-04 and 16.04 won't work al all.
The desktop installer of 12.04 works but when trying to install complains about the SDD being smaller than 4.4GB. The trick to overcome this was to plug in a pendrive with more than 4.4GB and then it installed by default on the internal SDD with 1GB still to spare.
An alternative is to create a persistent live system in the 4 GB SSD in your eeePC. The main image is compressed (from the iso file), and there will be more drive space available for extra program packages and your own data files (to be saved in thecasper-rw
file or partition). mkusb creates persistent live drives withcasper-rw
partitions for 14.04 and newer versions. You can use Unetbootin to create a persistent live drive with acasper-rw
file for Lubuntu 12.04 (I tested Unetbootin version 667 in Lubuntu 18.04.1 LTS).
– sudodus
Dec 9 at 0:01
I have installed Xubuntu 14.04 LTS in a friend's eeePC 900. This is a full installation which works in that computer with a 9 GB SSD.
– sudodus
Dec 9 at 0:07
add a comment |
For the benefit of other nostalgic owners of the (old but still cute) Eee PC.
After some fight, today (2018/12/8) I managed to install Lubuntu 12-04 on my Eee PC 4G, portuguese keyboard and all.
What I learned:
The oficial repository seems to be broken but this mirror is up: https://phillw.net/isos/lubuntu/precise/
The alternate installers of versions 16.04 and 12.04 won't install.
The desktop versions of 14-04 and 16.04 won't work al all.
The desktop installer of 12.04 works but when trying to install complains about the SDD being smaller than 4.4GB. The trick to overcome this was to plug in a pendrive with more than 4.4GB and then it installed by default on the internal SDD with 1GB still to spare.
For the benefit of other nostalgic owners of the (old but still cute) Eee PC.
After some fight, today (2018/12/8) I managed to install Lubuntu 12-04 on my Eee PC 4G, portuguese keyboard and all.
What I learned:
The oficial repository seems to be broken but this mirror is up: https://phillw.net/isos/lubuntu/precise/
The alternate installers of versions 16.04 and 12.04 won't install.
The desktop versions of 14-04 and 16.04 won't work al all.
The desktop installer of 12.04 works but when trying to install complains about the SDD being smaller than 4.4GB. The trick to overcome this was to plug in a pendrive with more than 4.4GB and then it installed by default on the internal SDD with 1GB still to spare.
edited Dec 15 at 23:04
answered Dec 8 at 20:24
Paulo Fonte
112
112
An alternative is to create a persistent live system in the 4 GB SSD in your eeePC. The main image is compressed (from the iso file), and there will be more drive space available for extra program packages and your own data files (to be saved in thecasper-rw
file or partition). mkusb creates persistent live drives withcasper-rw
partitions for 14.04 and newer versions. You can use Unetbootin to create a persistent live drive with acasper-rw
file for Lubuntu 12.04 (I tested Unetbootin version 667 in Lubuntu 18.04.1 LTS).
– sudodus
Dec 9 at 0:01
I have installed Xubuntu 14.04 LTS in a friend's eeePC 900. This is a full installation which works in that computer with a 9 GB SSD.
– sudodus
Dec 9 at 0:07
add a comment |
An alternative is to create a persistent live system in the 4 GB SSD in your eeePC. The main image is compressed (from the iso file), and there will be more drive space available for extra program packages and your own data files (to be saved in thecasper-rw
file or partition). mkusb creates persistent live drives withcasper-rw
partitions for 14.04 and newer versions. You can use Unetbootin to create a persistent live drive with acasper-rw
file for Lubuntu 12.04 (I tested Unetbootin version 667 in Lubuntu 18.04.1 LTS).
– sudodus
Dec 9 at 0:01
I have installed Xubuntu 14.04 LTS in a friend's eeePC 900. This is a full installation which works in that computer with a 9 GB SSD.
– sudodus
Dec 9 at 0:07
An alternative is to create a persistent live system in the 4 GB SSD in your eeePC. The main image is compressed (from the iso file), and there will be more drive space available for extra program packages and your own data files (to be saved in the
casper-rw
file or partition). mkusb creates persistent live drives with casper-rw
partitions for 14.04 and newer versions. You can use Unetbootin to create a persistent live drive with a casper-rw
file for Lubuntu 12.04 (I tested Unetbootin version 667 in Lubuntu 18.04.1 LTS).– sudodus
Dec 9 at 0:01
An alternative is to create a persistent live system in the 4 GB SSD in your eeePC. The main image is compressed (from the iso file), and there will be more drive space available for extra program packages and your own data files (to be saved in the
casper-rw
file or partition). mkusb creates persistent live drives with casper-rw
partitions for 14.04 and newer versions. You can use Unetbootin to create a persistent live drive with a casper-rw
file for Lubuntu 12.04 (I tested Unetbootin version 667 in Lubuntu 18.04.1 LTS).– sudodus
Dec 9 at 0:01
I have installed Xubuntu 14.04 LTS in a friend's eeePC 900. This is a full installation which works in that computer with a 9 GB SSD.
– sudodus
Dec 9 at 0:07
I have installed Xubuntu 14.04 LTS in a friend's eeePC 900. This is a full installation which works in that computer with a 9 GB SSD.
– sudodus
Dec 9 at 0:07
add a comment |
Try the following link http://www.eeebuntu.org/release/eeebuntu or as another option would be maybe a netbook remix version of ubuntu on one of the archive versions. I did this a while ago and used an image unpacked onto an SD card to perform the install, after some settings changes in the BIOS (had to flash new BIOS version) to change the boot order it was pretty simple.
I made a USB installer from the release on that site, but it still will not try to boot from the USB, it just boots to desktop and opens it in a file explorer. I seem to have changed the boot order in the BIOS, but it still just loads the desktop... frustrating!
– Pyrotequila
Feb 9 '14 at 14:42
1
The link is broken
– GunJack
May 23 '16 at 4:27
add a comment |
Try the following link http://www.eeebuntu.org/release/eeebuntu or as another option would be maybe a netbook remix version of ubuntu on one of the archive versions. I did this a while ago and used an image unpacked onto an SD card to perform the install, after some settings changes in the BIOS (had to flash new BIOS version) to change the boot order it was pretty simple.
I made a USB installer from the release on that site, but it still will not try to boot from the USB, it just boots to desktop and opens it in a file explorer. I seem to have changed the boot order in the BIOS, but it still just loads the desktop... frustrating!
– Pyrotequila
Feb 9 '14 at 14:42
1
The link is broken
– GunJack
May 23 '16 at 4:27
add a comment |
Try the following link http://www.eeebuntu.org/release/eeebuntu or as another option would be maybe a netbook remix version of ubuntu on one of the archive versions. I did this a while ago and used an image unpacked onto an SD card to perform the install, after some settings changes in the BIOS (had to flash new BIOS version) to change the boot order it was pretty simple.
Try the following link http://www.eeebuntu.org/release/eeebuntu or as another option would be maybe a netbook remix version of ubuntu on one of the archive versions. I did this a while ago and used an image unpacked onto an SD card to perform the install, after some settings changes in the BIOS (had to flash new BIOS version) to change the boot order it was pretty simple.
answered Feb 8 '14 at 20:40
Kai
539411
539411
I made a USB installer from the release on that site, but it still will not try to boot from the USB, it just boots to desktop and opens it in a file explorer. I seem to have changed the boot order in the BIOS, but it still just loads the desktop... frustrating!
– Pyrotequila
Feb 9 '14 at 14:42
1
The link is broken
– GunJack
May 23 '16 at 4:27
add a comment |
I made a USB installer from the release on that site, but it still will not try to boot from the USB, it just boots to desktop and opens it in a file explorer. I seem to have changed the boot order in the BIOS, but it still just loads the desktop... frustrating!
– Pyrotequila
Feb 9 '14 at 14:42
1
The link is broken
– GunJack
May 23 '16 at 4:27
I made a USB installer from the release on that site, but it still will not try to boot from the USB, it just boots to desktop and opens it in a file explorer. I seem to have changed the boot order in the BIOS, but it still just loads the desktop... frustrating!
– Pyrotequila
Feb 9 '14 at 14:42
I made a USB installer from the release on that site, but it still will not try to boot from the USB, it just boots to desktop and opens it in a file explorer. I seem to have changed the boot order in the BIOS, but it still just loads the desktop... frustrating!
– Pyrotequila
Feb 9 '14 at 14:42
1
1
The link is broken
– GunJack
May 23 '16 at 4:27
The link is broken
– GunJack
May 23 '16 at 4:27
add a comment |
Is the architecture version you tried 64bit? For a EEE PC 701 4G, you need to install the 32bit version.
You don't say what version Ubuntu you tried. I have had 10.04 running for a few years now, and have previously booted 12.04 as a LiveUSB.
add a comment |
Is the architecture version you tried 64bit? For a EEE PC 701 4G, you need to install the 32bit version.
You don't say what version Ubuntu you tried. I have had 10.04 running for a few years now, and have previously booted 12.04 as a LiveUSB.
add a comment |
Is the architecture version you tried 64bit? For a EEE PC 701 4G, you need to install the 32bit version.
You don't say what version Ubuntu you tried. I have had 10.04 running for a few years now, and have previously booted 12.04 as a LiveUSB.
Is the architecture version you tried 64bit? For a EEE PC 701 4G, you need to install the 32bit version.
You don't say what version Ubuntu you tried. I have had 10.04 running for a few years now, and have previously booted 12.04 as a LiveUSB.
answered Feb 19 '14 at 20:22
mcchots
232212
232212
add a comment |
add a comment |
Since it just have 512MB ram. I would advise against running the regular Ubuntu - Unity, Gnome or KDE version. It would be better to use lightweight version like Lubuntu, Xubuntu and Ubuntu. Your eeePC has a 32 bit processor, so try installing 32-bit version of these distributions. The best choice would be Lubuntu 14.04.4 LTS. Download Here
add a comment |
Since it just have 512MB ram. I would advise against running the regular Ubuntu - Unity, Gnome or KDE version. It would be better to use lightweight version like Lubuntu, Xubuntu and Ubuntu. Your eeePC has a 32 bit processor, so try installing 32-bit version of these distributions. The best choice would be Lubuntu 14.04.4 LTS. Download Here
add a comment |
Since it just have 512MB ram. I would advise against running the regular Ubuntu - Unity, Gnome or KDE version. It would be better to use lightweight version like Lubuntu, Xubuntu and Ubuntu. Your eeePC has a 32 bit processor, so try installing 32-bit version of these distributions. The best choice would be Lubuntu 14.04.4 LTS. Download Here
Since it just have 512MB ram. I would advise against running the regular Ubuntu - Unity, Gnome or KDE version. It would be better to use lightweight version like Lubuntu, Xubuntu and Ubuntu. Your eeePC has a 32 bit processor, so try installing 32-bit version of these distributions. The best choice would be Lubuntu 14.04.4 LTS. Download Here
answered May 23 '16 at 4:33
GunJack
1501316
1501316
add a comment |
add a comment |
If I remember correctly, that machine uses a Celeron M processor that does not support Physical Address Extensions (PAE), so the error you were likely getting was something like, "This kernel requires the following features not present on the CPU: pae."
You will need a 32 bit distribution that supports non-pae processors, which is getting harder to find. You might try reading this article for wisdom on getting Lubuntu or Xubuntu working on this machine. However it did not run very well the last time I tried it. I ended up trying to use bodhi Linux, which i believe still has a non-pae supporting kernel available. I also gave puppy Linux a good run, but that one doesn't like to be installed, but rather run as a bootable live image.
If you are feeling particularly crafty, I've heard talked of folks getting arch Linux working on these. You will have to pull out your best Google foo for that one though.
Good luck!
add a comment |
If I remember correctly, that machine uses a Celeron M processor that does not support Physical Address Extensions (PAE), so the error you were likely getting was something like, "This kernel requires the following features not present on the CPU: pae."
You will need a 32 bit distribution that supports non-pae processors, which is getting harder to find. You might try reading this article for wisdom on getting Lubuntu or Xubuntu working on this machine. However it did not run very well the last time I tried it. I ended up trying to use bodhi Linux, which i believe still has a non-pae supporting kernel available. I also gave puppy Linux a good run, but that one doesn't like to be installed, but rather run as a bootable live image.
If you are feeling particularly crafty, I've heard talked of folks getting arch Linux working on these. You will have to pull out your best Google foo for that one though.
Good luck!
add a comment |
If I remember correctly, that machine uses a Celeron M processor that does not support Physical Address Extensions (PAE), so the error you were likely getting was something like, "This kernel requires the following features not present on the CPU: pae."
You will need a 32 bit distribution that supports non-pae processors, which is getting harder to find. You might try reading this article for wisdom on getting Lubuntu or Xubuntu working on this machine. However it did not run very well the last time I tried it. I ended up trying to use bodhi Linux, which i believe still has a non-pae supporting kernel available. I also gave puppy Linux a good run, but that one doesn't like to be installed, but rather run as a bootable live image.
If you are feeling particularly crafty, I've heard talked of folks getting arch Linux working on these. You will have to pull out your best Google foo for that one though.
Good luck!
If I remember correctly, that machine uses a Celeron M processor that does not support Physical Address Extensions (PAE), so the error you were likely getting was something like, "This kernel requires the following features not present on the CPU: pae."
You will need a 32 bit distribution that supports non-pae processors, which is getting harder to find. You might try reading this article for wisdom on getting Lubuntu or Xubuntu working on this machine. However it did not run very well the last time I tried it. I ended up trying to use bodhi Linux, which i believe still has a non-pae supporting kernel available. I also gave puppy Linux a good run, but that one doesn't like to be installed, but rather run as a bootable live image.
If you are feeling particularly crafty, I've heard talked of folks getting arch Linux working on these. You will have to pull out your best Google foo for that one though.
Good luck!
answered May 23 '16 at 5:51
T0beus
55127
55127
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f418246%2fubuntu-on-an-asus-eee-pc-4g-701%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown