Multiplying only diagonal elements of a matrix











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I'm dealing with the following problem:



Suppose that I gave a upper diagonal matrix A of the form:
$A= begin{bmatrix} a_{11} & a_{12}&dots &a_{1n}\
0 & a_{22}&dots &a_{2n} \
vdots & vdots&dots &vdots\
0 & 0&dots &a_{nn} end{bmatrix}$



And a matrix $A'$ that is $A$ with only the diagonal elements multiplied by values $u_1,u_2,dots,u_n$, but the upper diagonal elements stay intact, that is:
$A' = begin{bmatrix} u_1 a_{11} & a_{12}&dots &a_{1n}\
0 & u_2 a_{22}&dots &a_{2n} \
vdots & vdots&dots &vdots\
0 & 0&dots &u_n a_{nn} end{bmatrix}$



How can I express $A'$ in terms of $A$?



Is there a way to express it in the form $A' =UA$? But then, what is the form of the matrix U?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • $A' = begin{bmatrix} u_{1} & 0&dots &0\ 0 & u_{2}&dots &0 \ vdots & vdots&dots &vdots\ 0 & 0&dots &u_{n} end{bmatrix}begin{bmatrix} a_{11} & 0&dots &0\ 0 & a_{22}&dots &0 \ vdots & vdots&dots &vdots\ 0 & 0&dots &a_{nn} end{bmatrix}+begin{bmatrix} 0 & a_{12}&dots &a_{1n}\ 0 & 0&dots &a_{2n} \ vdots & vdots&dots &vdots\ 0 & 0&dots &0 end{bmatrix}$. You got to isolate the diagonal elements and then multiply I guess.
    – Yadati Kiran
    Nov 22 at 17:45










  • Just calculate $U=A'A^{-1}$
    – Widawensen
    Nov 22 at 17:51






  • 1




    How about $$eqalign{ A' &= A + {rm Diag}(u!-!1){,rm Diag}(A) cr U &= A'A^{-1} = I + {rm Diag}(u!-!1){,rm Diag}(A)A^{-1} cr }$$
    – greg
    Nov 22 at 18:01










  • @Widawensen I need something that does not involve $A'$
    – Arthur T
    Nov 22 at 18:08






  • 1




    @ArthurT Anyway, the result is diag$(u_1,u_2,u_3)$ + some nilpotent matrix with more complicated entries.
    – Widawensen
    Nov 22 at 18:19















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I'm dealing with the following problem:



Suppose that I gave a upper diagonal matrix A of the form:
$A= begin{bmatrix} a_{11} & a_{12}&dots &a_{1n}\
0 & a_{22}&dots &a_{2n} \
vdots & vdots&dots &vdots\
0 & 0&dots &a_{nn} end{bmatrix}$



And a matrix $A'$ that is $A$ with only the diagonal elements multiplied by values $u_1,u_2,dots,u_n$, but the upper diagonal elements stay intact, that is:
$A' = begin{bmatrix} u_1 a_{11} & a_{12}&dots &a_{1n}\
0 & u_2 a_{22}&dots &a_{2n} \
vdots & vdots&dots &vdots\
0 & 0&dots &u_n a_{nn} end{bmatrix}$



How can I express $A'$ in terms of $A$?



Is there a way to express it in the form $A' =UA$? But then, what is the form of the matrix U?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • $A' = begin{bmatrix} u_{1} & 0&dots &0\ 0 & u_{2}&dots &0 \ vdots & vdots&dots &vdots\ 0 & 0&dots &u_{n} end{bmatrix}begin{bmatrix} a_{11} & 0&dots &0\ 0 & a_{22}&dots &0 \ vdots & vdots&dots &vdots\ 0 & 0&dots &a_{nn} end{bmatrix}+begin{bmatrix} 0 & a_{12}&dots &a_{1n}\ 0 & 0&dots &a_{2n} \ vdots & vdots&dots &vdots\ 0 & 0&dots &0 end{bmatrix}$. You got to isolate the diagonal elements and then multiply I guess.
    – Yadati Kiran
    Nov 22 at 17:45










  • Just calculate $U=A'A^{-1}$
    – Widawensen
    Nov 22 at 17:51






  • 1




    How about $$eqalign{ A' &= A + {rm Diag}(u!-!1){,rm Diag}(A) cr U &= A'A^{-1} = I + {rm Diag}(u!-!1){,rm Diag}(A)A^{-1} cr }$$
    – greg
    Nov 22 at 18:01










  • @Widawensen I need something that does not involve $A'$
    – Arthur T
    Nov 22 at 18:08






  • 1




    @ArthurT Anyway, the result is diag$(u_1,u_2,u_3)$ + some nilpotent matrix with more complicated entries.
    – Widawensen
    Nov 22 at 18:19













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











I'm dealing with the following problem:



Suppose that I gave a upper diagonal matrix A of the form:
$A= begin{bmatrix} a_{11} & a_{12}&dots &a_{1n}\
0 & a_{22}&dots &a_{2n} \
vdots & vdots&dots &vdots\
0 & 0&dots &a_{nn} end{bmatrix}$



And a matrix $A'$ that is $A$ with only the diagonal elements multiplied by values $u_1,u_2,dots,u_n$, but the upper diagonal elements stay intact, that is:
$A' = begin{bmatrix} u_1 a_{11} & a_{12}&dots &a_{1n}\
0 & u_2 a_{22}&dots &a_{2n} \
vdots & vdots&dots &vdots\
0 & 0&dots &u_n a_{nn} end{bmatrix}$



How can I express $A'$ in terms of $A$?



Is there a way to express it in the form $A' =UA$? But then, what is the form of the matrix U?










share|cite|improve this question













I'm dealing with the following problem:



Suppose that I gave a upper diagonal matrix A of the form:
$A= begin{bmatrix} a_{11} & a_{12}&dots &a_{1n}\
0 & a_{22}&dots &a_{2n} \
vdots & vdots&dots &vdots\
0 & 0&dots &a_{nn} end{bmatrix}$



And a matrix $A'$ that is $A$ with only the diagonal elements multiplied by values $u_1,u_2,dots,u_n$, but the upper diagonal elements stay intact, that is:
$A' = begin{bmatrix} u_1 a_{11} & a_{12}&dots &a_{1n}\
0 & u_2 a_{22}&dots &a_{2n} \
vdots & vdots&dots &vdots\
0 & 0&dots &u_n a_{nn} end{bmatrix}$



How can I express $A'$ in terms of $A$?



Is there a way to express it in the form $A' =UA$? But then, what is the form of the matrix U?







linear-algebra matrices matrix-calculus matrix-decomposition






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 22 at 17:32









Arthur T

1819




1819












  • $A' = begin{bmatrix} u_{1} & 0&dots &0\ 0 & u_{2}&dots &0 \ vdots & vdots&dots &vdots\ 0 & 0&dots &u_{n} end{bmatrix}begin{bmatrix} a_{11} & 0&dots &0\ 0 & a_{22}&dots &0 \ vdots & vdots&dots &vdots\ 0 & 0&dots &a_{nn} end{bmatrix}+begin{bmatrix} 0 & a_{12}&dots &a_{1n}\ 0 & 0&dots &a_{2n} \ vdots & vdots&dots &vdots\ 0 & 0&dots &0 end{bmatrix}$. You got to isolate the diagonal elements and then multiply I guess.
    – Yadati Kiran
    Nov 22 at 17:45










  • Just calculate $U=A'A^{-1}$
    – Widawensen
    Nov 22 at 17:51






  • 1




    How about $$eqalign{ A' &= A + {rm Diag}(u!-!1){,rm Diag}(A) cr U &= A'A^{-1} = I + {rm Diag}(u!-!1){,rm Diag}(A)A^{-1} cr }$$
    – greg
    Nov 22 at 18:01










  • @Widawensen I need something that does not involve $A'$
    – Arthur T
    Nov 22 at 18:08






  • 1




    @ArthurT Anyway, the result is diag$(u_1,u_2,u_3)$ + some nilpotent matrix with more complicated entries.
    – Widawensen
    Nov 22 at 18:19


















  • $A' = begin{bmatrix} u_{1} & 0&dots &0\ 0 & u_{2}&dots &0 \ vdots & vdots&dots &vdots\ 0 & 0&dots &u_{n} end{bmatrix}begin{bmatrix} a_{11} & 0&dots &0\ 0 & a_{22}&dots &0 \ vdots & vdots&dots &vdots\ 0 & 0&dots &a_{nn} end{bmatrix}+begin{bmatrix} 0 & a_{12}&dots &a_{1n}\ 0 & 0&dots &a_{2n} \ vdots & vdots&dots &vdots\ 0 & 0&dots &0 end{bmatrix}$. You got to isolate the diagonal elements and then multiply I guess.
    – Yadati Kiran
    Nov 22 at 17:45










  • Just calculate $U=A'A^{-1}$
    – Widawensen
    Nov 22 at 17:51






  • 1




    How about $$eqalign{ A' &= A + {rm Diag}(u!-!1){,rm Diag}(A) cr U &= A'A^{-1} = I + {rm Diag}(u!-!1){,rm Diag}(A)A^{-1} cr }$$
    – greg
    Nov 22 at 18:01










  • @Widawensen I need something that does not involve $A'$
    – Arthur T
    Nov 22 at 18:08






  • 1




    @ArthurT Anyway, the result is diag$(u_1,u_2,u_3)$ + some nilpotent matrix with more complicated entries.
    – Widawensen
    Nov 22 at 18:19
















$A' = begin{bmatrix} u_{1} & 0&dots &0\ 0 & u_{2}&dots &0 \ vdots & vdots&dots &vdots\ 0 & 0&dots &u_{n} end{bmatrix}begin{bmatrix} a_{11} & 0&dots &0\ 0 & a_{22}&dots &0 \ vdots & vdots&dots &vdots\ 0 & 0&dots &a_{nn} end{bmatrix}+begin{bmatrix} 0 & a_{12}&dots &a_{1n}\ 0 & 0&dots &a_{2n} \ vdots & vdots&dots &vdots\ 0 & 0&dots &0 end{bmatrix}$. You got to isolate the diagonal elements and then multiply I guess.
– Yadati Kiran
Nov 22 at 17:45




$A' = begin{bmatrix} u_{1} & 0&dots &0\ 0 & u_{2}&dots &0 \ vdots & vdots&dots &vdots\ 0 & 0&dots &u_{n} end{bmatrix}begin{bmatrix} a_{11} & 0&dots &0\ 0 & a_{22}&dots &0 \ vdots & vdots&dots &vdots\ 0 & 0&dots &a_{nn} end{bmatrix}+begin{bmatrix} 0 & a_{12}&dots &a_{1n}\ 0 & 0&dots &a_{2n} \ vdots & vdots&dots &vdots\ 0 & 0&dots &0 end{bmatrix}$. You got to isolate the diagonal elements and then multiply I guess.
– Yadati Kiran
Nov 22 at 17:45












Just calculate $U=A'A^{-1}$
– Widawensen
Nov 22 at 17:51




Just calculate $U=A'A^{-1}$
– Widawensen
Nov 22 at 17:51




1




1




How about $$eqalign{ A' &= A + {rm Diag}(u!-!1){,rm Diag}(A) cr U &= A'A^{-1} = I + {rm Diag}(u!-!1){,rm Diag}(A)A^{-1} cr }$$
– greg
Nov 22 at 18:01




How about $$eqalign{ A' &= A + {rm Diag}(u!-!1){,rm Diag}(A) cr U &= A'A^{-1} = I + {rm Diag}(u!-!1){,rm Diag}(A)A^{-1} cr }$$
– greg
Nov 22 at 18:01












@Widawensen I need something that does not involve $A'$
– Arthur T
Nov 22 at 18:08




@Widawensen I need something that does not involve $A'$
– Arthur T
Nov 22 at 18:08




1




1




@ArthurT Anyway, the result is diag$(u_1,u_2,u_3)$ + some nilpotent matrix with more complicated entries.
– Widawensen
Nov 22 at 18:19




@ArthurT Anyway, the result is diag$(u_1,u_2,u_3)$ + some nilpotent matrix with more complicated entries.
– Widawensen
Nov 22 at 18:19















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3009391%2fmultiplying-only-diagonal-elements-of-a-matrix%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown






























active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3009391%2fmultiplying-only-diagonal-elements-of-a-matrix%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Quarter-circle Tiles

build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

Mont Emei