Problem with NSolve











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I would like to plot the solutions of an equation, for different values of a parameter. This is my code



cdf[x_] := CDF[NormalDistribution[0, 1], x];
pdf[x_] := cdf'[x];
cdf2[x_] = cdf[x]^20;
pdf2[x_] = cdf2'[x];

mix[x_, h_, p_] = h pdf[x - p] + (1 - h) pdf2[x - p];
ratio[x_, h_] = mix[x, h, 1]/mix[x, h, 0];
sol = NSolve[ratio[x, h] == 0.5 && (-5 < x < 5), x]
Plot[x /. sol, {h, 0, 1}]


For $h$ between 0 and 0.6 there should be three solutions, for $h$ above 0.6 just one.
The plot, which runs in 5 minutes, returns only the solution for $h$ bigger than 0.6, while I believe I should get 3 different lines.



Can you help me fix this?



Thank you










share|improve this question




























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    I would like to plot the solutions of an equation, for different values of a parameter. This is my code



    cdf[x_] := CDF[NormalDistribution[0, 1], x];
    pdf[x_] := cdf'[x];
    cdf2[x_] = cdf[x]^20;
    pdf2[x_] = cdf2'[x];

    mix[x_, h_, p_] = h pdf[x - p] + (1 - h) pdf2[x - p];
    ratio[x_, h_] = mix[x, h, 1]/mix[x, h, 0];
    sol = NSolve[ratio[x, h] == 0.5 && (-5 < x < 5), x]
    Plot[x /. sol, {h, 0, 1}]


    For $h$ between 0 and 0.6 there should be three solutions, for $h$ above 0.6 just one.
    The plot, which runs in 5 minutes, returns only the solution for $h$ bigger than 0.6, while I believe I should get 3 different lines.



    Can you help me fix this?



    Thank you










    share|improve this question


























      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      I would like to plot the solutions of an equation, for different values of a parameter. This is my code



      cdf[x_] := CDF[NormalDistribution[0, 1], x];
      pdf[x_] := cdf'[x];
      cdf2[x_] = cdf[x]^20;
      pdf2[x_] = cdf2'[x];

      mix[x_, h_, p_] = h pdf[x - p] + (1 - h) pdf2[x - p];
      ratio[x_, h_] = mix[x, h, 1]/mix[x, h, 0];
      sol = NSolve[ratio[x, h] == 0.5 && (-5 < x < 5), x]
      Plot[x /. sol, {h, 0, 1}]


      For $h$ between 0 and 0.6 there should be three solutions, for $h$ above 0.6 just one.
      The plot, which runs in 5 minutes, returns only the solution for $h$ bigger than 0.6, while I believe I should get 3 different lines.



      Can you help me fix this?



      Thank you










      share|improve this question















      I would like to plot the solutions of an equation, for different values of a parameter. This is my code



      cdf[x_] := CDF[NormalDistribution[0, 1], x];
      pdf[x_] := cdf'[x];
      cdf2[x_] = cdf[x]^20;
      pdf2[x_] = cdf2'[x];

      mix[x_, h_, p_] = h pdf[x - p] + (1 - h) pdf2[x - p];
      ratio[x_, h_] = mix[x, h, 1]/mix[x, h, 0];
      sol = NSolve[ratio[x, h] == 0.5 && (-5 < x < 5), x]
      Plot[x /. sol, {h, 0, 1}]


      For $h$ between 0 and 0.6 there should be three solutions, for $h$ above 0.6 just one.
      The plot, which runs in 5 minutes, returns only the solution for $h$ bigger than 0.6, while I believe I should get 3 different lines.



      Can you help me fix this?



      Thank you







      equation-solving






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 4 hours ago

























      asked 5 hours ago









      Api

      416




      416






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          cdf[x_] := CDF[NormalDistribution, x];
          pdf[x_] := cdf'[x];
          cdf2[x_] = cdf[x]^20;
          pdf2[x_] = cdf2'[x];

          mix[x_, h_, p_] = h pdf[x - p] + (1 - h) pdf2[x - p] // Simplify;

          ratio[x_, h_] = mix[x, h, 1]/mix[x, h, 0] // Simplify;

          Clear[sol]

          sol[h_?NumericQ] := NSolve[ratio[x, h] == 1/2 && (-5 < x < 5), x]


          Generate data for a ListLinePlot. This is slow



          data = Table[{h, #} & /@ (x /. sol[h]), {h, 0, 1, .005}];

          data2 = GatherBy[data, Length];

          ListLinePlot[{
          Rest@Flatten[data2[[1]], 1],
          Sequence @@ Transpose[data2[[2]]]},
          PlotLegends -> Placed[Automatic, {0.75, 0.45}]]


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer





















          • Thank you for your answer, it's just great and very helpful. I've got just one question: why is there a little 'hole' between line 3 and 4? I would like to fix this if it were possible somehow. I tried to change $dh$ at .0005 but this results in an error. Thank you
            – Api
            3 hours ago










          • There is a gap because the gradient is very steep and the steps would need to be smaller as you suggest. The better solution is to use ContourPlot as suggested by @UlrichNeumann.
            – Bob Hanlon
            2 hours ago


















          up vote
          3
          down vote













          NSolve cannot solve the equation because the equation isn't numeric(depends on h)



          For a first insight of the solution use



           ContourPlot[ratio[x, h] == 0.5, {x, -1, 3}, {h, 0, 1},MaxRecursion -> 5, FrameLabel -> {x, h}]


          enter image description here



          Try



          sol[h_?NumericQ] := Values[NSolve[ratio[x, h] == 0.5 && (-5 < x < 5), x]//Flatten]


          to get parameter dependent solutions.



          sol[.5]
          (*{-0.193146, 1.3878, 1.94506}*)
          sol[.75]
          (*{-0.193147}*)


          Addenum



          Unfortunately the solution cannot be plotted, because the number of solutions varies ...



          Looking at the Contourplot it is possible to evaluate the Contourline using NDSolve:



          First we need one point of the contourline, for example point h==0:



          NSolve[{ratio[x, 0] == 1/2, -3 < x < 3}, x, Reals] (*{x -> 2.12759}*)


          contourline doesn't change



          H = NDSolveValue[{D[ratio[x, h[x]], x] == 0 ,h[2.127591638090098`] == 0}, h,{x, -1, 3}]


          The left boundary of the solution range



          H["Domain"][[1]] (* {-0.193105, 2.23873} *)
          x0=%[[1]]


          fullfills ratio[x0,h]==1/2 x==x0 is also a solution .



          Show[{Plot[H[x], {x, -1, 3}, PlotRange -> {0, 1}],ParametricPlot[{x0, h}, {h, 0, 1}]}, AxesLabel -> {x, h[x]}]


          enter image description here



          That's it, hope I could help!






          share|improve this answer























          • I tried, but then this error was reported: SetDelayed::write: Tag List in {{x->-0.193133},{x->0.774654},{x->2.11263}}[h_?NumericQ] is Protected.
            – Api
            5 hours ago












          • Would you mind to produce the code for plotting it? I am sorry, I am an absolute beginner, I tried some guesses but I always get an empty graph
            – Api
            5 hours ago






          • 1




            The code is Plot[Evaluate[ sol[h]], {h, 0, 1}] but evaluation doesn't finish...
            – Ulrich Neumann
            5 hours ago










          • It takes 5 minutes and then it returns a graph which again shows just one of the solutions
            – Api
            5 hours ago










          • Sorry, I don't know why the Plot doesn't work as expected.
            – Ulrich Neumann
            5 hours ago











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "387"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f187998%2fproblem-with-nsolve%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          cdf[x_] := CDF[NormalDistribution, x];
          pdf[x_] := cdf'[x];
          cdf2[x_] = cdf[x]^20;
          pdf2[x_] = cdf2'[x];

          mix[x_, h_, p_] = h pdf[x - p] + (1 - h) pdf2[x - p] // Simplify;

          ratio[x_, h_] = mix[x, h, 1]/mix[x, h, 0] // Simplify;

          Clear[sol]

          sol[h_?NumericQ] := NSolve[ratio[x, h] == 1/2 && (-5 < x < 5), x]


          Generate data for a ListLinePlot. This is slow



          data = Table[{h, #} & /@ (x /. sol[h]), {h, 0, 1, .005}];

          data2 = GatherBy[data, Length];

          ListLinePlot[{
          Rest@Flatten[data2[[1]], 1],
          Sequence @@ Transpose[data2[[2]]]},
          PlotLegends -> Placed[Automatic, {0.75, 0.45}]]


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer





















          • Thank you for your answer, it's just great and very helpful. I've got just one question: why is there a little 'hole' between line 3 and 4? I would like to fix this if it were possible somehow. I tried to change $dh$ at .0005 but this results in an error. Thank you
            – Api
            3 hours ago










          • There is a gap because the gradient is very steep and the steps would need to be smaller as you suggest. The better solution is to use ContourPlot as suggested by @UlrichNeumann.
            – Bob Hanlon
            2 hours ago















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          cdf[x_] := CDF[NormalDistribution, x];
          pdf[x_] := cdf'[x];
          cdf2[x_] = cdf[x]^20;
          pdf2[x_] = cdf2'[x];

          mix[x_, h_, p_] = h pdf[x - p] + (1 - h) pdf2[x - p] // Simplify;

          ratio[x_, h_] = mix[x, h, 1]/mix[x, h, 0] // Simplify;

          Clear[sol]

          sol[h_?NumericQ] := NSolve[ratio[x, h] == 1/2 && (-5 < x < 5), x]


          Generate data for a ListLinePlot. This is slow



          data = Table[{h, #} & /@ (x /. sol[h]), {h, 0, 1, .005}];

          data2 = GatherBy[data, Length];

          ListLinePlot[{
          Rest@Flatten[data2[[1]], 1],
          Sequence @@ Transpose[data2[[2]]]},
          PlotLegends -> Placed[Automatic, {0.75, 0.45}]]


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer





















          • Thank you for your answer, it's just great and very helpful. I've got just one question: why is there a little 'hole' between line 3 and 4? I would like to fix this if it were possible somehow. I tried to change $dh$ at .0005 but this results in an error. Thank you
            – Api
            3 hours ago










          • There is a gap because the gradient is very steep and the steps would need to be smaller as you suggest. The better solution is to use ContourPlot as suggested by @UlrichNeumann.
            – Bob Hanlon
            2 hours ago













          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted






          cdf[x_] := CDF[NormalDistribution, x];
          pdf[x_] := cdf'[x];
          cdf2[x_] = cdf[x]^20;
          pdf2[x_] = cdf2'[x];

          mix[x_, h_, p_] = h pdf[x - p] + (1 - h) pdf2[x - p] // Simplify;

          ratio[x_, h_] = mix[x, h, 1]/mix[x, h, 0] // Simplify;

          Clear[sol]

          sol[h_?NumericQ] := NSolve[ratio[x, h] == 1/2 && (-5 < x < 5), x]


          Generate data for a ListLinePlot. This is slow



          data = Table[{h, #} & /@ (x /. sol[h]), {h, 0, 1, .005}];

          data2 = GatherBy[data, Length];

          ListLinePlot[{
          Rest@Flatten[data2[[1]], 1],
          Sequence @@ Transpose[data2[[2]]]},
          PlotLegends -> Placed[Automatic, {0.75, 0.45}]]


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer












          cdf[x_] := CDF[NormalDistribution, x];
          pdf[x_] := cdf'[x];
          cdf2[x_] = cdf[x]^20;
          pdf2[x_] = cdf2'[x];

          mix[x_, h_, p_] = h pdf[x - p] + (1 - h) pdf2[x - p] // Simplify;

          ratio[x_, h_] = mix[x, h, 1]/mix[x, h, 0] // Simplify;

          Clear[sol]

          sol[h_?NumericQ] := NSolve[ratio[x, h] == 1/2 && (-5 < x < 5), x]


          Generate data for a ListLinePlot. This is slow



          data = Table[{h, #} & /@ (x /. sol[h]), {h, 0, 1, .005}];

          data2 = GatherBy[data, Length];

          ListLinePlot[{
          Rest@Flatten[data2[[1]], 1],
          Sequence @@ Transpose[data2[[2]]]},
          PlotLegends -> Placed[Automatic, {0.75, 0.45}]]


          enter image description here







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 3 hours ago









          Bob Hanlon

          58.4k23595




          58.4k23595












          • Thank you for your answer, it's just great and very helpful. I've got just one question: why is there a little 'hole' between line 3 and 4? I would like to fix this if it were possible somehow. I tried to change $dh$ at .0005 but this results in an error. Thank you
            – Api
            3 hours ago










          • There is a gap because the gradient is very steep and the steps would need to be smaller as you suggest. The better solution is to use ContourPlot as suggested by @UlrichNeumann.
            – Bob Hanlon
            2 hours ago


















          • Thank you for your answer, it's just great and very helpful. I've got just one question: why is there a little 'hole' between line 3 and 4? I would like to fix this if it were possible somehow. I tried to change $dh$ at .0005 but this results in an error. Thank you
            – Api
            3 hours ago










          • There is a gap because the gradient is very steep and the steps would need to be smaller as you suggest. The better solution is to use ContourPlot as suggested by @UlrichNeumann.
            – Bob Hanlon
            2 hours ago
















          Thank you for your answer, it's just great and very helpful. I've got just one question: why is there a little 'hole' between line 3 and 4? I would like to fix this if it were possible somehow. I tried to change $dh$ at .0005 but this results in an error. Thank you
          – Api
          3 hours ago




          Thank you for your answer, it's just great and very helpful. I've got just one question: why is there a little 'hole' between line 3 and 4? I would like to fix this if it were possible somehow. I tried to change $dh$ at .0005 but this results in an error. Thank you
          – Api
          3 hours ago












          There is a gap because the gradient is very steep and the steps would need to be smaller as you suggest. The better solution is to use ContourPlot as suggested by @UlrichNeumann.
          – Bob Hanlon
          2 hours ago




          There is a gap because the gradient is very steep and the steps would need to be smaller as you suggest. The better solution is to use ContourPlot as suggested by @UlrichNeumann.
          – Bob Hanlon
          2 hours ago










          up vote
          3
          down vote













          NSolve cannot solve the equation because the equation isn't numeric(depends on h)



          For a first insight of the solution use



           ContourPlot[ratio[x, h] == 0.5, {x, -1, 3}, {h, 0, 1},MaxRecursion -> 5, FrameLabel -> {x, h}]


          enter image description here



          Try



          sol[h_?NumericQ] := Values[NSolve[ratio[x, h] == 0.5 && (-5 < x < 5), x]//Flatten]


          to get parameter dependent solutions.



          sol[.5]
          (*{-0.193146, 1.3878, 1.94506}*)
          sol[.75]
          (*{-0.193147}*)


          Addenum



          Unfortunately the solution cannot be plotted, because the number of solutions varies ...



          Looking at the Contourplot it is possible to evaluate the Contourline using NDSolve:



          First we need one point of the contourline, for example point h==0:



          NSolve[{ratio[x, 0] == 1/2, -3 < x < 3}, x, Reals] (*{x -> 2.12759}*)


          contourline doesn't change



          H = NDSolveValue[{D[ratio[x, h[x]], x] == 0 ,h[2.127591638090098`] == 0}, h,{x, -1, 3}]


          The left boundary of the solution range



          H["Domain"][[1]] (* {-0.193105, 2.23873} *)
          x0=%[[1]]


          fullfills ratio[x0,h]==1/2 x==x0 is also a solution .



          Show[{Plot[H[x], {x, -1, 3}, PlotRange -> {0, 1}],ParametricPlot[{x0, h}, {h, 0, 1}]}, AxesLabel -> {x, h[x]}]


          enter image description here



          That's it, hope I could help!






          share|improve this answer























          • I tried, but then this error was reported: SetDelayed::write: Tag List in {{x->-0.193133},{x->0.774654},{x->2.11263}}[h_?NumericQ] is Protected.
            – Api
            5 hours ago












          • Would you mind to produce the code for plotting it? I am sorry, I am an absolute beginner, I tried some guesses but I always get an empty graph
            – Api
            5 hours ago






          • 1




            The code is Plot[Evaluate[ sol[h]], {h, 0, 1}] but evaluation doesn't finish...
            – Ulrich Neumann
            5 hours ago










          • It takes 5 minutes and then it returns a graph which again shows just one of the solutions
            – Api
            5 hours ago










          • Sorry, I don't know why the Plot doesn't work as expected.
            – Ulrich Neumann
            5 hours ago















          up vote
          3
          down vote













          NSolve cannot solve the equation because the equation isn't numeric(depends on h)



          For a first insight of the solution use



           ContourPlot[ratio[x, h] == 0.5, {x, -1, 3}, {h, 0, 1},MaxRecursion -> 5, FrameLabel -> {x, h}]


          enter image description here



          Try



          sol[h_?NumericQ] := Values[NSolve[ratio[x, h] == 0.5 && (-5 < x < 5), x]//Flatten]


          to get parameter dependent solutions.



          sol[.5]
          (*{-0.193146, 1.3878, 1.94506}*)
          sol[.75]
          (*{-0.193147}*)


          Addenum



          Unfortunately the solution cannot be plotted, because the number of solutions varies ...



          Looking at the Contourplot it is possible to evaluate the Contourline using NDSolve:



          First we need one point of the contourline, for example point h==0:



          NSolve[{ratio[x, 0] == 1/2, -3 < x < 3}, x, Reals] (*{x -> 2.12759}*)


          contourline doesn't change



          H = NDSolveValue[{D[ratio[x, h[x]], x] == 0 ,h[2.127591638090098`] == 0}, h,{x, -1, 3}]


          The left boundary of the solution range



          H["Domain"][[1]] (* {-0.193105, 2.23873} *)
          x0=%[[1]]


          fullfills ratio[x0,h]==1/2 x==x0 is also a solution .



          Show[{Plot[H[x], {x, -1, 3}, PlotRange -> {0, 1}],ParametricPlot[{x0, h}, {h, 0, 1}]}, AxesLabel -> {x, h[x]}]


          enter image description here



          That's it, hope I could help!






          share|improve this answer























          • I tried, but then this error was reported: SetDelayed::write: Tag List in {{x->-0.193133},{x->0.774654},{x->2.11263}}[h_?NumericQ] is Protected.
            – Api
            5 hours ago












          • Would you mind to produce the code for plotting it? I am sorry, I am an absolute beginner, I tried some guesses but I always get an empty graph
            – Api
            5 hours ago






          • 1




            The code is Plot[Evaluate[ sol[h]], {h, 0, 1}] but evaluation doesn't finish...
            – Ulrich Neumann
            5 hours ago










          • It takes 5 minutes and then it returns a graph which again shows just one of the solutions
            – Api
            5 hours ago










          • Sorry, I don't know why the Plot doesn't work as expected.
            – Ulrich Neumann
            5 hours ago













          up vote
          3
          down vote










          up vote
          3
          down vote









          NSolve cannot solve the equation because the equation isn't numeric(depends on h)



          For a first insight of the solution use



           ContourPlot[ratio[x, h] == 0.5, {x, -1, 3}, {h, 0, 1},MaxRecursion -> 5, FrameLabel -> {x, h}]


          enter image description here



          Try



          sol[h_?NumericQ] := Values[NSolve[ratio[x, h] == 0.5 && (-5 < x < 5), x]//Flatten]


          to get parameter dependent solutions.



          sol[.5]
          (*{-0.193146, 1.3878, 1.94506}*)
          sol[.75]
          (*{-0.193147}*)


          Addenum



          Unfortunately the solution cannot be plotted, because the number of solutions varies ...



          Looking at the Contourplot it is possible to evaluate the Contourline using NDSolve:



          First we need one point of the contourline, for example point h==0:



          NSolve[{ratio[x, 0] == 1/2, -3 < x < 3}, x, Reals] (*{x -> 2.12759}*)


          contourline doesn't change



          H = NDSolveValue[{D[ratio[x, h[x]], x] == 0 ,h[2.127591638090098`] == 0}, h,{x, -1, 3}]


          The left boundary of the solution range



          H["Domain"][[1]] (* {-0.193105, 2.23873} *)
          x0=%[[1]]


          fullfills ratio[x0,h]==1/2 x==x0 is also a solution .



          Show[{Plot[H[x], {x, -1, 3}, PlotRange -> {0, 1}],ParametricPlot[{x0, h}, {h, 0, 1}]}, AxesLabel -> {x, h[x]}]


          enter image description here



          That's it, hope I could help!






          share|improve this answer














          NSolve cannot solve the equation because the equation isn't numeric(depends on h)



          For a first insight of the solution use



           ContourPlot[ratio[x, h] == 0.5, {x, -1, 3}, {h, 0, 1},MaxRecursion -> 5, FrameLabel -> {x, h}]


          enter image description here



          Try



          sol[h_?NumericQ] := Values[NSolve[ratio[x, h] == 0.5 && (-5 < x < 5), x]//Flatten]


          to get parameter dependent solutions.



          sol[.5]
          (*{-0.193146, 1.3878, 1.94506}*)
          sol[.75]
          (*{-0.193147}*)


          Addenum



          Unfortunately the solution cannot be plotted, because the number of solutions varies ...



          Looking at the Contourplot it is possible to evaluate the Contourline using NDSolve:



          First we need one point of the contourline, for example point h==0:



          NSolve[{ratio[x, 0] == 1/2, -3 < x < 3}, x, Reals] (*{x -> 2.12759}*)


          contourline doesn't change



          H = NDSolveValue[{D[ratio[x, h[x]], x] == 0 ,h[2.127591638090098`] == 0}, h,{x, -1, 3}]


          The left boundary of the solution range



          H["Domain"][[1]] (* {-0.193105, 2.23873} *)
          x0=%[[1]]


          fullfills ratio[x0,h]==1/2 x==x0 is also a solution .



          Show[{Plot[H[x], {x, -1, 3}, PlotRange -> {0, 1}],ParametricPlot[{x0, h}, {h, 0, 1}]}, AxesLabel -> {x, h[x]}]


          enter image description here



          That's it, hope I could help!







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 1 hour ago

























          answered 5 hours ago









          Ulrich Neumann

          6,585515




          6,585515












          • I tried, but then this error was reported: SetDelayed::write: Tag List in {{x->-0.193133},{x->0.774654},{x->2.11263}}[h_?NumericQ] is Protected.
            – Api
            5 hours ago












          • Would you mind to produce the code for plotting it? I am sorry, I am an absolute beginner, I tried some guesses but I always get an empty graph
            – Api
            5 hours ago






          • 1




            The code is Plot[Evaluate[ sol[h]], {h, 0, 1}] but evaluation doesn't finish...
            – Ulrich Neumann
            5 hours ago










          • It takes 5 minutes and then it returns a graph which again shows just one of the solutions
            – Api
            5 hours ago










          • Sorry, I don't know why the Plot doesn't work as expected.
            – Ulrich Neumann
            5 hours ago


















          • I tried, but then this error was reported: SetDelayed::write: Tag List in {{x->-0.193133},{x->0.774654},{x->2.11263}}[h_?NumericQ] is Protected.
            – Api
            5 hours ago












          • Would you mind to produce the code for plotting it? I am sorry, I am an absolute beginner, I tried some guesses but I always get an empty graph
            – Api
            5 hours ago






          • 1




            The code is Plot[Evaluate[ sol[h]], {h, 0, 1}] but evaluation doesn't finish...
            – Ulrich Neumann
            5 hours ago










          • It takes 5 minutes and then it returns a graph which again shows just one of the solutions
            – Api
            5 hours ago










          • Sorry, I don't know why the Plot doesn't work as expected.
            – Ulrich Neumann
            5 hours ago
















          I tried, but then this error was reported: SetDelayed::write: Tag List in {{x->-0.193133},{x->0.774654},{x->2.11263}}[h_?NumericQ] is Protected.
          – Api
          5 hours ago






          I tried, but then this error was reported: SetDelayed::write: Tag List in {{x->-0.193133},{x->0.774654},{x->2.11263}}[h_?NumericQ] is Protected.
          – Api
          5 hours ago














          Would you mind to produce the code for plotting it? I am sorry, I am an absolute beginner, I tried some guesses but I always get an empty graph
          – Api
          5 hours ago




          Would you mind to produce the code for plotting it? I am sorry, I am an absolute beginner, I tried some guesses but I always get an empty graph
          – Api
          5 hours ago




          1




          1




          The code is Plot[Evaluate[ sol[h]], {h, 0, 1}] but evaluation doesn't finish...
          – Ulrich Neumann
          5 hours ago




          The code is Plot[Evaluate[ sol[h]], {h, 0, 1}] but evaluation doesn't finish...
          – Ulrich Neumann
          5 hours ago












          It takes 5 minutes and then it returns a graph which again shows just one of the solutions
          – Api
          5 hours ago




          It takes 5 minutes and then it returns a graph which again shows just one of the solutions
          – Api
          5 hours ago












          Sorry, I don't know why the Plot doesn't work as expected.
          – Ulrich Neumann
          5 hours ago




          Sorry, I don't know why the Plot doesn't work as expected.
          – Ulrich Neumann
          5 hours ago


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f187998%2fproblem-with-nsolve%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Quarter-circle Tiles

          build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

          Mont Emei