Computing cohomology of dihedral group in detail











up vote
3
down vote

favorite












So I tried to compute the cohomology of $D_{2n}$, for n odd , $H^{k}(D_{2n}, Bbb Z)$. using Lyndon SS. I have obtained a few obstacles:





My computation, using the fact that there is a $C_2$ action $H^q(C_m, Bbb Z)$, shows that my $E_2^{pq}$ page looks like this:



$$ Bbb Z/m quad 0 quad 0 quad 0 quad 0 quad 0 quad cdots $$
$$ cdots 0 cdots $$ $$ cdots 0 cdots $$ $$ cdots 0 cdots $$
$$ Bbb Z/m quad 0 quad 0 quad 0 quad 0 quad 0 quad cdots $$
$$ cdots 0 cdots $$
$$ cdots 0 cdots $$
$$ cdots 0 cdots $$
$$ Bbb Z quad 0 quad Bbb Z/2 quad 0 quad Bbb Z/2 quad 0 quad cdots $$



Is this correct?





I suspect the correct $E_2$ page is more or less similar. But I am still unclear how this gives $H^k(D_{2n},Bbb Z)$.



a) How is this $E_2$ page related to $H^k(D_{2n},Bbb Z)$? I only know the case when page 2 collapses to an axis.



b) I suppose one has to show all differential are $0$ to compute $E_infty^{p,q}$. In my case this is simple, since all are $0$.



c) Even if we know the $E_infty$ page does this give $H_n$ - surely we cannot just take direct sum? **





** Supposing my calucations were correct - then we can go to c) directly: What we have here is the relation when $n equiv 0 pmod 4$
$$ 0 rightarrow C_2 rightarrow H^n rightarrow C_m rightarrow 0 $$










share|cite|improve this question




























    up vote
    3
    down vote

    favorite












    So I tried to compute the cohomology of $D_{2n}$, for n odd , $H^{k}(D_{2n}, Bbb Z)$. using Lyndon SS. I have obtained a few obstacles:





    My computation, using the fact that there is a $C_2$ action $H^q(C_m, Bbb Z)$, shows that my $E_2^{pq}$ page looks like this:



    $$ Bbb Z/m quad 0 quad 0 quad 0 quad 0 quad 0 quad cdots $$
    $$ cdots 0 cdots $$ $$ cdots 0 cdots $$ $$ cdots 0 cdots $$
    $$ Bbb Z/m quad 0 quad 0 quad 0 quad 0 quad 0 quad cdots $$
    $$ cdots 0 cdots $$
    $$ cdots 0 cdots $$
    $$ cdots 0 cdots $$
    $$ Bbb Z quad 0 quad Bbb Z/2 quad 0 quad Bbb Z/2 quad 0 quad cdots $$



    Is this correct?





    I suspect the correct $E_2$ page is more or less similar. But I am still unclear how this gives $H^k(D_{2n},Bbb Z)$.



    a) How is this $E_2$ page related to $H^k(D_{2n},Bbb Z)$? I only know the case when page 2 collapses to an axis.



    b) I suppose one has to show all differential are $0$ to compute $E_infty^{p,q}$. In my case this is simple, since all are $0$.



    c) Even if we know the $E_infty$ page does this give $H_n$ - surely we cannot just take direct sum? **





    ** Supposing my calucations were correct - then we can go to c) directly: What we have here is the relation when $n equiv 0 pmod 4$
    $$ 0 rightarrow C_2 rightarrow H^n rightarrow C_m rightarrow 0 $$










    share|cite|improve this question


























      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite











      So I tried to compute the cohomology of $D_{2n}$, for n odd , $H^{k}(D_{2n}, Bbb Z)$. using Lyndon SS. I have obtained a few obstacles:





      My computation, using the fact that there is a $C_2$ action $H^q(C_m, Bbb Z)$, shows that my $E_2^{pq}$ page looks like this:



      $$ Bbb Z/m quad 0 quad 0 quad 0 quad 0 quad 0 quad cdots $$
      $$ cdots 0 cdots $$ $$ cdots 0 cdots $$ $$ cdots 0 cdots $$
      $$ Bbb Z/m quad 0 quad 0 quad 0 quad 0 quad 0 quad cdots $$
      $$ cdots 0 cdots $$
      $$ cdots 0 cdots $$
      $$ cdots 0 cdots $$
      $$ Bbb Z quad 0 quad Bbb Z/2 quad 0 quad Bbb Z/2 quad 0 quad cdots $$



      Is this correct?





      I suspect the correct $E_2$ page is more or less similar. But I am still unclear how this gives $H^k(D_{2n},Bbb Z)$.



      a) How is this $E_2$ page related to $H^k(D_{2n},Bbb Z)$? I only know the case when page 2 collapses to an axis.



      b) I suppose one has to show all differential are $0$ to compute $E_infty^{p,q}$. In my case this is simple, since all are $0$.



      c) Even if we know the $E_infty$ page does this give $H_n$ - surely we cannot just take direct sum? **





      ** Supposing my calucations were correct - then we can go to c) directly: What we have here is the relation when $n equiv 0 pmod 4$
      $$ 0 rightarrow C_2 rightarrow H^n rightarrow C_m rightarrow 0 $$










      share|cite|improve this question















      So I tried to compute the cohomology of $D_{2n}$, for n odd , $H^{k}(D_{2n}, Bbb Z)$. using Lyndon SS. I have obtained a few obstacles:





      My computation, using the fact that there is a $C_2$ action $H^q(C_m, Bbb Z)$, shows that my $E_2^{pq}$ page looks like this:



      $$ Bbb Z/m quad 0 quad 0 quad 0 quad 0 quad 0 quad cdots $$
      $$ cdots 0 cdots $$ $$ cdots 0 cdots $$ $$ cdots 0 cdots $$
      $$ Bbb Z/m quad 0 quad 0 quad 0 quad 0 quad 0 quad cdots $$
      $$ cdots 0 cdots $$
      $$ cdots 0 cdots $$
      $$ cdots 0 cdots $$
      $$ Bbb Z quad 0 quad Bbb Z/2 quad 0 quad Bbb Z/2 quad 0 quad cdots $$



      Is this correct?





      I suspect the correct $E_2$ page is more or less similar. But I am still unclear how this gives $H^k(D_{2n},Bbb Z)$.



      a) How is this $E_2$ page related to $H^k(D_{2n},Bbb Z)$? I only know the case when page 2 collapses to an axis.



      b) I suppose one has to show all differential are $0$ to compute $E_infty^{p,q}$. In my case this is simple, since all are $0$.



      c) Even if we know the $E_infty$ page does this give $H_n$ - surely we cannot just take direct sum? **





      ** Supposing my calucations were correct - then we can go to c) directly: What we have here is the relation when $n equiv 0 pmod 4$
      $$ 0 rightarrow C_2 rightarrow H^n rightarrow C_m rightarrow 0 $$







      homology-cohomology homological-algebra group-cohomology






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 23 hours ago

























      asked yesterday









      CL.

      2,0102822




      2,0102822






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          Your $E_2$ page is correct.



          To continue, observe that everything nonzero in your $E_2$ page lies in some even bidegree $(2p,2q)$, and that the grading of the differential $d^i$ on the $E_i$ page is of bidegree $(1-i, i)$, and in particular, changes the parity of at least one of the degrees; in particular, $d^i$ must be identically zero for all $i$. So $E_2 = E_infty$. This is always true for spectral sequences whose elements are concentrated in bidegrees $(p,q)$ with $p+q$ even.



          Next, let us recall what it means that this spectral sequence converges: the calculational part of that means that the homology groups $H^k(D_{2n}, Bbb Z)$ have a filtration $0 = F^0 supset cdots supset F^i supset F^{i+1} supset cdots$ and the associated graded $$text{gr}^p H^{p+q}(D_{2n}, Bbb Z) = E^{p,q}_infty.$$



          For us, on the lines with $p + q = 4n+2$, we see that there is only one nontrivial subquotient $F^p/F^{p+1}$, and in particular, $H^{4n+2} = E^infty_{4n+2,0}$.



          On the lines with $p + q = 4n >0$, we have two terms. There is $E^infty_{4n,0} = F^0/F^1 H^{4n}$; because there is nothing until $q = 4n$, we see that $F^1 = F^2 = cdots = F^{4n}$, but that $F^{4n+1} = 0$, and thus $F^{4n} = E^infty_{0,4n}.$



          In particular, we have a short exact sequence $0 to E^infty_{0,4n} to H^{4n} to E^infty_{4n,0} to 0$. Resolving this is what is usually called "solving a filtration problem". If there are more than two nonzero terms on the $p+q = n$ line, then one has to resolve these iteratively, starting from $E^infty_{0,4n}$ and walking down the line.



          In this particular case, $E^infty_{4n,0} = Bbb Z/2$, and $E^infty_{0,4n} = Bbb Z/m$ where $m$ is odd. Extensions of abelian groups where the subgroup and quotient are of coprime order always split, and so in particular $H^{4n} = Bbb Z/2 oplus Bbb Z/m cong Bbb Z/2m$ in this case.



          If you are also interested in the multiplicative structure, one can write this ring as $Bbb Z[c_1, c_2]/(2c_1, c_1^2 = mc_2)$, following the strategy of this answer for $S_3 = D_6$; there is no essential difference between that case and $D_{4n+2}$ in general.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • I don't want to bump again, but in the final paragraph $|c_1| = 2$ and $|c_2| = 4$; that is, $c_1$ is the nonzero element of $H^2$ and $c_2$ is a choice of generator for $H^4 = Bbb Z/2m$.
            – Mike Miller
            11 hours ago










          • Thanks a lot. Just curious, is there a reason why your notation went from $E_infty $ to $E^infty$?
            – CL.
            49 mins ago













          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2998997%2fcomputing-cohomology-of-dihedral-group-in-detail%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          Your $E_2$ page is correct.



          To continue, observe that everything nonzero in your $E_2$ page lies in some even bidegree $(2p,2q)$, and that the grading of the differential $d^i$ on the $E_i$ page is of bidegree $(1-i, i)$, and in particular, changes the parity of at least one of the degrees; in particular, $d^i$ must be identically zero for all $i$. So $E_2 = E_infty$. This is always true for spectral sequences whose elements are concentrated in bidegrees $(p,q)$ with $p+q$ even.



          Next, let us recall what it means that this spectral sequence converges: the calculational part of that means that the homology groups $H^k(D_{2n}, Bbb Z)$ have a filtration $0 = F^0 supset cdots supset F^i supset F^{i+1} supset cdots$ and the associated graded $$text{gr}^p H^{p+q}(D_{2n}, Bbb Z) = E^{p,q}_infty.$$



          For us, on the lines with $p + q = 4n+2$, we see that there is only one nontrivial subquotient $F^p/F^{p+1}$, and in particular, $H^{4n+2} = E^infty_{4n+2,0}$.



          On the lines with $p + q = 4n >0$, we have two terms. There is $E^infty_{4n,0} = F^0/F^1 H^{4n}$; because there is nothing until $q = 4n$, we see that $F^1 = F^2 = cdots = F^{4n}$, but that $F^{4n+1} = 0$, and thus $F^{4n} = E^infty_{0,4n}.$



          In particular, we have a short exact sequence $0 to E^infty_{0,4n} to H^{4n} to E^infty_{4n,0} to 0$. Resolving this is what is usually called "solving a filtration problem". If there are more than two nonzero terms on the $p+q = n$ line, then one has to resolve these iteratively, starting from $E^infty_{0,4n}$ and walking down the line.



          In this particular case, $E^infty_{4n,0} = Bbb Z/2$, and $E^infty_{0,4n} = Bbb Z/m$ where $m$ is odd. Extensions of abelian groups where the subgroup and quotient are of coprime order always split, and so in particular $H^{4n} = Bbb Z/2 oplus Bbb Z/m cong Bbb Z/2m$ in this case.



          If you are also interested in the multiplicative structure, one can write this ring as $Bbb Z[c_1, c_2]/(2c_1, c_1^2 = mc_2)$, following the strategy of this answer for $S_3 = D_6$; there is no essential difference between that case and $D_{4n+2}$ in general.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • I don't want to bump again, but in the final paragraph $|c_1| = 2$ and $|c_2| = 4$; that is, $c_1$ is the nonzero element of $H^2$ and $c_2$ is a choice of generator for $H^4 = Bbb Z/2m$.
            – Mike Miller
            11 hours ago










          • Thanks a lot. Just curious, is there a reason why your notation went from $E_infty $ to $E^infty$?
            – CL.
            49 mins ago

















          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          Your $E_2$ page is correct.



          To continue, observe that everything nonzero in your $E_2$ page lies in some even bidegree $(2p,2q)$, and that the grading of the differential $d^i$ on the $E_i$ page is of bidegree $(1-i, i)$, and in particular, changes the parity of at least one of the degrees; in particular, $d^i$ must be identically zero for all $i$. So $E_2 = E_infty$. This is always true for spectral sequences whose elements are concentrated in bidegrees $(p,q)$ with $p+q$ even.



          Next, let us recall what it means that this spectral sequence converges: the calculational part of that means that the homology groups $H^k(D_{2n}, Bbb Z)$ have a filtration $0 = F^0 supset cdots supset F^i supset F^{i+1} supset cdots$ and the associated graded $$text{gr}^p H^{p+q}(D_{2n}, Bbb Z) = E^{p,q}_infty.$$



          For us, on the lines with $p + q = 4n+2$, we see that there is only one nontrivial subquotient $F^p/F^{p+1}$, and in particular, $H^{4n+2} = E^infty_{4n+2,0}$.



          On the lines with $p + q = 4n >0$, we have two terms. There is $E^infty_{4n,0} = F^0/F^1 H^{4n}$; because there is nothing until $q = 4n$, we see that $F^1 = F^2 = cdots = F^{4n}$, but that $F^{4n+1} = 0$, and thus $F^{4n} = E^infty_{0,4n}.$



          In particular, we have a short exact sequence $0 to E^infty_{0,4n} to H^{4n} to E^infty_{4n,0} to 0$. Resolving this is what is usually called "solving a filtration problem". If there are more than two nonzero terms on the $p+q = n$ line, then one has to resolve these iteratively, starting from $E^infty_{0,4n}$ and walking down the line.



          In this particular case, $E^infty_{4n,0} = Bbb Z/2$, and $E^infty_{0,4n} = Bbb Z/m$ where $m$ is odd. Extensions of abelian groups where the subgroup and quotient are of coprime order always split, and so in particular $H^{4n} = Bbb Z/2 oplus Bbb Z/m cong Bbb Z/2m$ in this case.



          If you are also interested in the multiplicative structure, one can write this ring as $Bbb Z[c_1, c_2]/(2c_1, c_1^2 = mc_2)$, following the strategy of this answer for $S_3 = D_6$; there is no essential difference between that case and $D_{4n+2}$ in general.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • I don't want to bump again, but in the final paragraph $|c_1| = 2$ and $|c_2| = 4$; that is, $c_1$ is the nonzero element of $H^2$ and $c_2$ is a choice of generator for $H^4 = Bbb Z/2m$.
            – Mike Miller
            11 hours ago










          • Thanks a lot. Just curious, is there a reason why your notation went from $E_infty $ to $E^infty$?
            – CL.
            49 mins ago















          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted






          Your $E_2$ page is correct.



          To continue, observe that everything nonzero in your $E_2$ page lies in some even bidegree $(2p,2q)$, and that the grading of the differential $d^i$ on the $E_i$ page is of bidegree $(1-i, i)$, and in particular, changes the parity of at least one of the degrees; in particular, $d^i$ must be identically zero for all $i$. So $E_2 = E_infty$. This is always true for spectral sequences whose elements are concentrated in bidegrees $(p,q)$ with $p+q$ even.



          Next, let us recall what it means that this spectral sequence converges: the calculational part of that means that the homology groups $H^k(D_{2n}, Bbb Z)$ have a filtration $0 = F^0 supset cdots supset F^i supset F^{i+1} supset cdots$ and the associated graded $$text{gr}^p H^{p+q}(D_{2n}, Bbb Z) = E^{p,q}_infty.$$



          For us, on the lines with $p + q = 4n+2$, we see that there is only one nontrivial subquotient $F^p/F^{p+1}$, and in particular, $H^{4n+2} = E^infty_{4n+2,0}$.



          On the lines with $p + q = 4n >0$, we have two terms. There is $E^infty_{4n,0} = F^0/F^1 H^{4n}$; because there is nothing until $q = 4n$, we see that $F^1 = F^2 = cdots = F^{4n}$, but that $F^{4n+1} = 0$, and thus $F^{4n} = E^infty_{0,4n}.$



          In particular, we have a short exact sequence $0 to E^infty_{0,4n} to H^{4n} to E^infty_{4n,0} to 0$. Resolving this is what is usually called "solving a filtration problem". If there are more than two nonzero terms on the $p+q = n$ line, then one has to resolve these iteratively, starting from $E^infty_{0,4n}$ and walking down the line.



          In this particular case, $E^infty_{4n,0} = Bbb Z/2$, and $E^infty_{0,4n} = Bbb Z/m$ where $m$ is odd. Extensions of abelian groups where the subgroup and quotient are of coprime order always split, and so in particular $H^{4n} = Bbb Z/2 oplus Bbb Z/m cong Bbb Z/2m$ in this case.



          If you are also interested in the multiplicative structure, one can write this ring as $Bbb Z[c_1, c_2]/(2c_1, c_1^2 = mc_2)$, following the strategy of this answer for $S_3 = D_6$; there is no essential difference between that case and $D_{4n+2}$ in general.






          share|cite|improve this answer














          Your $E_2$ page is correct.



          To continue, observe that everything nonzero in your $E_2$ page lies in some even bidegree $(2p,2q)$, and that the grading of the differential $d^i$ on the $E_i$ page is of bidegree $(1-i, i)$, and in particular, changes the parity of at least one of the degrees; in particular, $d^i$ must be identically zero for all $i$. So $E_2 = E_infty$. This is always true for spectral sequences whose elements are concentrated in bidegrees $(p,q)$ with $p+q$ even.



          Next, let us recall what it means that this spectral sequence converges: the calculational part of that means that the homology groups $H^k(D_{2n}, Bbb Z)$ have a filtration $0 = F^0 supset cdots supset F^i supset F^{i+1} supset cdots$ and the associated graded $$text{gr}^p H^{p+q}(D_{2n}, Bbb Z) = E^{p,q}_infty.$$



          For us, on the lines with $p + q = 4n+2$, we see that there is only one nontrivial subquotient $F^p/F^{p+1}$, and in particular, $H^{4n+2} = E^infty_{4n+2,0}$.



          On the lines with $p + q = 4n >0$, we have two terms. There is $E^infty_{4n,0} = F^0/F^1 H^{4n}$; because there is nothing until $q = 4n$, we see that $F^1 = F^2 = cdots = F^{4n}$, but that $F^{4n+1} = 0$, and thus $F^{4n} = E^infty_{0,4n}.$



          In particular, we have a short exact sequence $0 to E^infty_{0,4n} to H^{4n} to E^infty_{4n,0} to 0$. Resolving this is what is usually called "solving a filtration problem". If there are more than two nonzero terms on the $p+q = n$ line, then one has to resolve these iteratively, starting from $E^infty_{0,4n}$ and walking down the line.



          In this particular case, $E^infty_{4n,0} = Bbb Z/2$, and $E^infty_{0,4n} = Bbb Z/m$ where $m$ is odd. Extensions of abelian groups where the subgroup and quotient are of coprime order always split, and so in particular $H^{4n} = Bbb Z/2 oplus Bbb Z/m cong Bbb Z/2m$ in this case.



          If you are also interested in the multiplicative structure, one can write this ring as $Bbb Z[c_1, c_2]/(2c_1, c_1^2 = mc_2)$, following the strategy of this answer for $S_3 = D_6$; there is no essential difference between that case and $D_{4n+2}$ in general.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited 20 hours ago

























          answered 22 hours ago









          Mike Miller

          35.1k467131




          35.1k467131












          • I don't want to bump again, but in the final paragraph $|c_1| = 2$ and $|c_2| = 4$; that is, $c_1$ is the nonzero element of $H^2$ and $c_2$ is a choice of generator for $H^4 = Bbb Z/2m$.
            – Mike Miller
            11 hours ago










          • Thanks a lot. Just curious, is there a reason why your notation went from $E_infty $ to $E^infty$?
            – CL.
            49 mins ago




















          • I don't want to bump again, but in the final paragraph $|c_1| = 2$ and $|c_2| = 4$; that is, $c_1$ is the nonzero element of $H^2$ and $c_2$ is a choice of generator for $H^4 = Bbb Z/2m$.
            – Mike Miller
            11 hours ago










          • Thanks a lot. Just curious, is there a reason why your notation went from $E_infty $ to $E^infty$?
            – CL.
            49 mins ago


















          I don't want to bump again, but in the final paragraph $|c_1| = 2$ and $|c_2| = 4$; that is, $c_1$ is the nonzero element of $H^2$ and $c_2$ is a choice of generator for $H^4 = Bbb Z/2m$.
          – Mike Miller
          11 hours ago




          I don't want to bump again, but in the final paragraph $|c_1| = 2$ and $|c_2| = 4$; that is, $c_1$ is the nonzero element of $H^2$ and $c_2$ is a choice of generator for $H^4 = Bbb Z/2m$.
          – Mike Miller
          11 hours ago












          Thanks a lot. Just curious, is there a reason why your notation went from $E_infty $ to $E^infty$?
          – CL.
          49 mins ago






          Thanks a lot. Just curious, is there a reason why your notation went from $E_infty $ to $E^infty$?
          – CL.
          49 mins ago




















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded



















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2998997%2fcomputing-cohomology-of-dihedral-group-in-detail%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Quarter-circle Tiles

          build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

          Mont Emei