Hausdorff measure (open subset containing x)
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Let $s geq 0$ be a real number and $E subset mathbb{R^n}$.
Suppose that for all $x in E$ there is an open subset $U subset mathbb{R^n}$ which contains $x$, and $mathcal{H^s}(E cap U)=0 Rightarrow mathcal{H^s}(E)=0$.
How to show this implication?
I tried to use:
Since $E subset mathbb{R^n}$, it exists a number $s_0=$inf$lbrace s in [0, infty):mathcal{H^s}(E)=0 rbrace$.
So $s_0(E)leq s$ and for all $x in E$ there is an open subset $U Rightarrow s_0(E) geq s$.
Here I don't see how to conclude. It should be possible to use that every open cover of $E subset mathbb{R^n}$ has a countable subcover, but how to apply it here?
Is this way correct or can it be proved differently?
measure-theory
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Let $s geq 0$ be a real number and $E subset mathbb{R^n}$.
Suppose that for all $x in E$ there is an open subset $U subset mathbb{R^n}$ which contains $x$, and $mathcal{H^s}(E cap U)=0 Rightarrow mathcal{H^s}(E)=0$.
How to show this implication?
I tried to use:
Since $E subset mathbb{R^n}$, it exists a number $s_0=$inf$lbrace s in [0, infty):mathcal{H^s}(E)=0 rbrace$.
So $s_0(E)leq s$ and for all $x in E$ there is an open subset $U Rightarrow s_0(E) geq s$.
Here I don't see how to conclude. It should be possible to use that every open cover of $E subset mathbb{R^n}$ has a countable subcover, but how to apply it here?
Is this way correct or can it be proved differently?
measure-theory
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Let $s geq 0$ be a real number and $E subset mathbb{R^n}$.
Suppose that for all $x in E$ there is an open subset $U subset mathbb{R^n}$ which contains $x$, and $mathcal{H^s}(E cap U)=0 Rightarrow mathcal{H^s}(E)=0$.
How to show this implication?
I tried to use:
Since $E subset mathbb{R^n}$, it exists a number $s_0=$inf$lbrace s in [0, infty):mathcal{H^s}(E)=0 rbrace$.
So $s_0(E)leq s$ and for all $x in E$ there is an open subset $U Rightarrow s_0(E) geq s$.
Here I don't see how to conclude. It should be possible to use that every open cover of $E subset mathbb{R^n}$ has a countable subcover, but how to apply it here?
Is this way correct or can it be proved differently?
measure-theory
Let $s geq 0$ be a real number and $E subset mathbb{R^n}$.
Suppose that for all $x in E$ there is an open subset $U subset mathbb{R^n}$ which contains $x$, and $mathcal{H^s}(E cap U)=0 Rightarrow mathcal{H^s}(E)=0$.
How to show this implication?
I tried to use:
Since $E subset mathbb{R^n}$, it exists a number $s_0=$inf$lbrace s in [0, infty):mathcal{H^s}(E)=0 rbrace$.
So $s_0(E)leq s$ and for all $x in E$ there is an open subset $U Rightarrow s_0(E) geq s$.
Here I don't see how to conclude. It should be possible to use that every open cover of $E subset mathbb{R^n}$ has a countable subcover, but how to apply it here?
Is this way correct or can it be proved differently?
measure-theory
measure-theory
asked 20 hours ago
Tartulop
474
474
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
$H^{s}$ is countably subadditive and every open cover has a countable subcover. If $Esubset cup U_i$ with $H^{s} (Ecap U_i)=0$ for all $i$ then $H^{s}(E) leq sum H^{s} (Ecap U_i)=0$.
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
$H^{s}$ is countably subadditive and every open cover has a countable subcover. If $Esubset cup U_i$ with $H^{s} (Ecap U_i)=0$ for all $i$ then $H^{s}(E) leq sum H^{s} (Ecap U_i)=0$.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
$H^{s}$ is countably subadditive and every open cover has a countable subcover. If $Esubset cup U_i$ with $H^{s} (Ecap U_i)=0$ for all $i$ then $H^{s}(E) leq sum H^{s} (Ecap U_i)=0$.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
$H^{s}$ is countably subadditive and every open cover has a countable subcover. If $Esubset cup U_i$ with $H^{s} (Ecap U_i)=0$ for all $i$ then $H^{s}(E) leq sum H^{s} (Ecap U_i)=0$.
$H^{s}$ is countably subadditive and every open cover has a countable subcover. If $Esubset cup U_i$ with $H^{s} (Ecap U_i)=0$ for all $i$ then $H^{s}(E) leq sum H^{s} (Ecap U_i)=0$.
answered 20 hours ago
Kavi Rama Murthy
39.1k31748
39.1k31748
add a comment |
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2999424%2fhausdorff-measure-open-subset-containing-x%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown