Strict Bernstein Inequality











up vote
3
down vote

favorite
3













We define the entropy function by
$$H(x)=xlnfrac{1}{x}+(1-x)lnfrac{1}{1-x} quad text{ for } 0 leq x leq 1 $$
where $H(0)=H(1)=0$.



a) For integers $0leq kleq n$ prove that
$$binom{n}{k} leq e^{ncdot H(x)} quad text{ for } x=frac{k}{n}. $$
$textit{Hint}$: use that $$ sum_{m=0}^nbinom{n}{m}x^m(1-x)^{n-m}=1 $$



b) For integers $0 leq k leq n$, prove that
$$binom{n}{k} geq frac{1}{n+1}e^{ncdot H(x)} quad text{ for } x=frac{k}{n}$$
$textit{Hint}$: use the hint for part a)



c) Let $X_1,X_2,...X_n$ be independent r.v. s.t. $$mathbf{P}(X_k=1)=frac{1}{2} text{ and } mathbf{P}(X_k=-1)=frac{1}{2} $$



Let $X=X_1+X_2+...+X_n$. Deduce from parts a) and b) that for any $0 leq alpha <1 $ $$lim_{n rightarrow infty}sqrt[n]{mathbf{P}(Xgeq alpha n)}=sqrt{frac{1}{(1-alpha)^{1-alpha}(1+alpha)^{1+alpha}}} $$




Attempt at a) we know $$ sum_{m=0}^nbinom{n}{m}x^m(1-x)^{n-m}=1 $$
$$begin{align} binom{n}{m}x^m(1-x)^{n-m} leq & ; 1 \ lnleft(binom{n}{m}right)+lnleft(x^mright)+lnleft((1-x)^{n-m}right)leq & ; 0 \ lnbinom{n}{m}leq &-(m)ln(x)-(n-m)ln(1-x) \ binom{n}{m} leq & ; e^{-mln(x)-(n-m)ln(1-x)}end{align}$$



Choosing $k=m$, and then letting $frac{k}{n}=x$:



$$begin{align} binom{n}{k} leq & ; e^{-kln(x)-(n-k)ln(1-x)} \ binom{n}{k} leq & ; e^{-nleft(frac{k}{n}ln(x)+(1-frac{k}{n})ln(1-x)right)} \ binom{n}{k} leq & ; e^{nleft(xln(frac{1}{x})+(1-x)ln(frac{1}{1-x})right)}\ binom{n}{k} leq & ; e^{nH(x)}end{align}$$










share|cite|improve this question
























  • math.stackexchange.com/questions/2998474/… linking these two.
    – elcharlosmaster
    Nov 14 at 17:25















up vote
3
down vote

favorite
3













We define the entropy function by
$$H(x)=xlnfrac{1}{x}+(1-x)lnfrac{1}{1-x} quad text{ for } 0 leq x leq 1 $$
where $H(0)=H(1)=0$.



a) For integers $0leq kleq n$ prove that
$$binom{n}{k} leq e^{ncdot H(x)} quad text{ for } x=frac{k}{n}. $$
$textit{Hint}$: use that $$ sum_{m=0}^nbinom{n}{m}x^m(1-x)^{n-m}=1 $$



b) For integers $0 leq k leq n$, prove that
$$binom{n}{k} geq frac{1}{n+1}e^{ncdot H(x)} quad text{ for } x=frac{k}{n}$$
$textit{Hint}$: use the hint for part a)



c) Let $X_1,X_2,...X_n$ be independent r.v. s.t. $$mathbf{P}(X_k=1)=frac{1}{2} text{ and } mathbf{P}(X_k=-1)=frac{1}{2} $$



Let $X=X_1+X_2+...+X_n$. Deduce from parts a) and b) that for any $0 leq alpha <1 $ $$lim_{n rightarrow infty}sqrt[n]{mathbf{P}(Xgeq alpha n)}=sqrt{frac{1}{(1-alpha)^{1-alpha}(1+alpha)^{1+alpha}}} $$




Attempt at a) we know $$ sum_{m=0}^nbinom{n}{m}x^m(1-x)^{n-m}=1 $$
$$begin{align} binom{n}{m}x^m(1-x)^{n-m} leq & ; 1 \ lnleft(binom{n}{m}right)+lnleft(x^mright)+lnleft((1-x)^{n-m}right)leq & ; 0 \ lnbinom{n}{m}leq &-(m)ln(x)-(n-m)ln(1-x) \ binom{n}{m} leq & ; e^{-mln(x)-(n-m)ln(1-x)}end{align}$$



Choosing $k=m$, and then letting $frac{k}{n}=x$:



$$begin{align} binom{n}{k} leq & ; e^{-kln(x)-(n-k)ln(1-x)} \ binom{n}{k} leq & ; e^{-nleft(frac{k}{n}ln(x)+(1-frac{k}{n})ln(1-x)right)} \ binom{n}{k} leq & ; e^{nleft(xln(frac{1}{x})+(1-x)ln(frac{1}{1-x})right)}\ binom{n}{k} leq & ; e^{nH(x)}end{align}$$










share|cite|improve this question
























  • math.stackexchange.com/questions/2998474/… linking these two.
    – elcharlosmaster
    Nov 14 at 17:25













up vote
3
down vote

favorite
3









up vote
3
down vote

favorite
3






3






We define the entropy function by
$$H(x)=xlnfrac{1}{x}+(1-x)lnfrac{1}{1-x} quad text{ for } 0 leq x leq 1 $$
where $H(0)=H(1)=0$.



a) For integers $0leq kleq n$ prove that
$$binom{n}{k} leq e^{ncdot H(x)} quad text{ for } x=frac{k}{n}. $$
$textit{Hint}$: use that $$ sum_{m=0}^nbinom{n}{m}x^m(1-x)^{n-m}=1 $$



b) For integers $0 leq k leq n$, prove that
$$binom{n}{k} geq frac{1}{n+1}e^{ncdot H(x)} quad text{ for } x=frac{k}{n}$$
$textit{Hint}$: use the hint for part a)



c) Let $X_1,X_2,...X_n$ be independent r.v. s.t. $$mathbf{P}(X_k=1)=frac{1}{2} text{ and } mathbf{P}(X_k=-1)=frac{1}{2} $$



Let $X=X_1+X_2+...+X_n$. Deduce from parts a) and b) that for any $0 leq alpha <1 $ $$lim_{n rightarrow infty}sqrt[n]{mathbf{P}(Xgeq alpha n)}=sqrt{frac{1}{(1-alpha)^{1-alpha}(1+alpha)^{1+alpha}}} $$




Attempt at a) we know $$ sum_{m=0}^nbinom{n}{m}x^m(1-x)^{n-m}=1 $$
$$begin{align} binom{n}{m}x^m(1-x)^{n-m} leq & ; 1 \ lnleft(binom{n}{m}right)+lnleft(x^mright)+lnleft((1-x)^{n-m}right)leq & ; 0 \ lnbinom{n}{m}leq &-(m)ln(x)-(n-m)ln(1-x) \ binom{n}{m} leq & ; e^{-mln(x)-(n-m)ln(1-x)}end{align}$$



Choosing $k=m$, and then letting $frac{k}{n}=x$:



$$begin{align} binom{n}{k} leq & ; e^{-kln(x)-(n-k)ln(1-x)} \ binom{n}{k} leq & ; e^{-nleft(frac{k}{n}ln(x)+(1-frac{k}{n})ln(1-x)right)} \ binom{n}{k} leq & ; e^{nleft(xln(frac{1}{x})+(1-x)ln(frac{1}{1-x})right)}\ binom{n}{k} leq & ; e^{nH(x)}end{align}$$










share|cite|improve this question
















We define the entropy function by
$$H(x)=xlnfrac{1}{x}+(1-x)lnfrac{1}{1-x} quad text{ for } 0 leq x leq 1 $$
where $H(0)=H(1)=0$.



a) For integers $0leq kleq n$ prove that
$$binom{n}{k} leq e^{ncdot H(x)} quad text{ for } x=frac{k}{n}. $$
$textit{Hint}$: use that $$ sum_{m=0}^nbinom{n}{m}x^m(1-x)^{n-m}=1 $$



b) For integers $0 leq k leq n$, prove that
$$binom{n}{k} geq frac{1}{n+1}e^{ncdot H(x)} quad text{ for } x=frac{k}{n}$$
$textit{Hint}$: use the hint for part a)



c) Let $X_1,X_2,...X_n$ be independent r.v. s.t. $$mathbf{P}(X_k=1)=frac{1}{2} text{ and } mathbf{P}(X_k=-1)=frac{1}{2} $$



Let $X=X_1+X_2+...+X_n$. Deduce from parts a) and b) that for any $0 leq alpha <1 $ $$lim_{n rightarrow infty}sqrt[n]{mathbf{P}(Xgeq alpha n)}=sqrt{frac{1}{(1-alpha)^{1-alpha}(1+alpha)^{1+alpha}}} $$




Attempt at a) we know $$ sum_{m=0}^nbinom{n}{m}x^m(1-x)^{n-m}=1 $$
$$begin{align} binom{n}{m}x^m(1-x)^{n-m} leq & ; 1 \ lnleft(binom{n}{m}right)+lnleft(x^mright)+lnleft((1-x)^{n-m}right)leq & ; 0 \ lnbinom{n}{m}leq &-(m)ln(x)-(n-m)ln(1-x) \ binom{n}{m} leq & ; e^{-mln(x)-(n-m)ln(1-x)}end{align}$$



Choosing $k=m$, and then letting $frac{k}{n}=x$:



$$begin{align} binom{n}{k} leq & ; e^{-kln(x)-(n-k)ln(1-x)} \ binom{n}{k} leq & ; e^{-nleft(frac{k}{n}ln(x)+(1-frac{k}{n})ln(1-x)right)} \ binom{n}{k} leq & ; e^{nleft(xln(frac{1}{x})+(1-x)ln(frac{1}{1-x})right)}\ binom{n}{k} leq & ; e^{nH(x)}end{align}$$







probability random-variables binomial-theorem






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 2 days ago

























asked Nov 14 at 17:09









elcharlosmaster

1036




1036












  • math.stackexchange.com/questions/2998474/… linking these two.
    – elcharlosmaster
    Nov 14 at 17:25


















  • math.stackexchange.com/questions/2998474/… linking these two.
    – elcharlosmaster
    Nov 14 at 17:25
















math.stackexchange.com/questions/2998474/… linking these two.
– elcharlosmaster
Nov 14 at 17:25




math.stackexchange.com/questions/2998474/… linking these two.
– elcharlosmaster
Nov 14 at 17:25










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote













I start with part (a). From the suggestion one has:



${nchoose{k}}x^k(1-x)^{n-k}le 1, 0le x le 1$



and taking logarithms:



$ln{nchoose{k}}le -k ln(x)-(n-k)ln(1-x), 0le x le 1$



The right member dipends on $x$ and has a minimum and $x=k/n$. Plugging this value one has the first inequality.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • I tried with part (b) but in that case it is more problematic (for me) to use the hint of part 1...
    – Thomas
    yesterday




















up vote
0
down vote













I continue trying part (b). I write a separate answer because point (b) is much different than point (a) and the answer quite longer.



This solution is based on two lemmas. If $x_k=frac{k}{n}$




Lemma 1: $max_{0 le x le 1} x^{k}(1-x)^{n-k}=e^{-nH(x_k))}$. This should follow by simple calculus.




and:




Lemma 2: For every fixed $0 le k le n$, $argmax_{ 0 le m le n} {nchoose m} (x_k)^m(1-x_k)^{n-m}=k$ , i.e. the maximum is for $m=k$.



This should follow writing $m=k+a$ and verifying that the ratio between the quantity calculated for $a=0$ and $a$ different than zero is greater than one. This follows by writing the ratio and identifying it as a product of terms all greater than one.




Given Lemma 1 and Lemma2 we have the thesis. By the binomial theorem:



$sum_m {nchoose m} (x_k)^m(1-x_k)^{n-m} =1$



Therefore in particular the maximum addend, which is for $m=k$ by lemma 2, shall be greater than $frac{1}{n+1}$:



${nchoose m} (x_k)^m(1-x_k)^{n-m} ge frac{1}{n+1}$ [1]



By lemma 1:



${nchoose m}(x_k)^m(1-x_k)^{n-m} le {nchoose m}e^{-nH(x_k)}$ [2]



Comparing [1] and [2] we have the thesis.



I just outlined my procedure for proving the lammas but hopefully the are correct even if they require a bit of calculations!






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Hi, thank you for your time and comment. I am still working through it but am confused as to how you got lemma 1 and 2, i think i understand what you do once you have established the lemmas.
    – elcharlosmaster
    1 hour ago











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2998530%2fstrict-bernstein-inequality%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
1
down vote













I start with part (a). From the suggestion one has:



${nchoose{k}}x^k(1-x)^{n-k}le 1, 0le x le 1$



and taking logarithms:



$ln{nchoose{k}}le -k ln(x)-(n-k)ln(1-x), 0le x le 1$



The right member dipends on $x$ and has a minimum and $x=k/n$. Plugging this value one has the first inequality.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • I tried with part (b) but in that case it is more problematic (for me) to use the hint of part 1...
    – Thomas
    yesterday

















up vote
1
down vote













I start with part (a). From the suggestion one has:



${nchoose{k}}x^k(1-x)^{n-k}le 1, 0le x le 1$



and taking logarithms:



$ln{nchoose{k}}le -k ln(x)-(n-k)ln(1-x), 0le x le 1$



The right member dipends on $x$ and has a minimum and $x=k/n$. Plugging this value one has the first inequality.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • I tried with part (b) but in that case it is more problematic (for me) to use the hint of part 1...
    – Thomas
    yesterday















up vote
1
down vote










up vote
1
down vote









I start with part (a). From the suggestion one has:



${nchoose{k}}x^k(1-x)^{n-k}le 1, 0le x le 1$



and taking logarithms:



$ln{nchoose{k}}le -k ln(x)-(n-k)ln(1-x), 0le x le 1$



The right member dipends on $x$ and has a minimum and $x=k/n$. Plugging this value one has the first inequality.






share|cite|improve this answer












I start with part (a). From the suggestion one has:



${nchoose{k}}x^k(1-x)^{n-k}le 1, 0le x le 1$



and taking logarithms:



$ln{nchoose{k}}le -k ln(x)-(n-k)ln(1-x), 0le x le 1$



The right member dipends on $x$ and has a minimum and $x=k/n$. Plugging this value one has the first inequality.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered 2 days ago









Thomas

12318




12318












  • I tried with part (b) but in that case it is more problematic (for me) to use the hint of part 1...
    – Thomas
    yesterday




















  • I tried with part (b) but in that case it is more problematic (for me) to use the hint of part 1...
    – Thomas
    yesterday


















I tried with part (b) but in that case it is more problematic (for me) to use the hint of part 1...
– Thomas
yesterday






I tried with part (b) but in that case it is more problematic (for me) to use the hint of part 1...
– Thomas
yesterday












up vote
0
down vote













I continue trying part (b). I write a separate answer because point (b) is much different than point (a) and the answer quite longer.



This solution is based on two lemmas. If $x_k=frac{k}{n}$




Lemma 1: $max_{0 le x le 1} x^{k}(1-x)^{n-k}=e^{-nH(x_k))}$. This should follow by simple calculus.




and:




Lemma 2: For every fixed $0 le k le n$, $argmax_{ 0 le m le n} {nchoose m} (x_k)^m(1-x_k)^{n-m}=k$ , i.e. the maximum is for $m=k$.



This should follow writing $m=k+a$ and verifying that the ratio between the quantity calculated for $a=0$ and $a$ different than zero is greater than one. This follows by writing the ratio and identifying it as a product of terms all greater than one.




Given Lemma 1 and Lemma2 we have the thesis. By the binomial theorem:



$sum_m {nchoose m} (x_k)^m(1-x_k)^{n-m} =1$



Therefore in particular the maximum addend, which is for $m=k$ by lemma 2, shall be greater than $frac{1}{n+1}$:



${nchoose m} (x_k)^m(1-x_k)^{n-m} ge frac{1}{n+1}$ [1]



By lemma 1:



${nchoose m}(x_k)^m(1-x_k)^{n-m} le {nchoose m}e^{-nH(x_k)}$ [2]



Comparing [1] and [2] we have the thesis.



I just outlined my procedure for proving the lammas but hopefully the are correct even if they require a bit of calculations!






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Hi, thank you for your time and comment. I am still working through it but am confused as to how you got lemma 1 and 2, i think i understand what you do once you have established the lemmas.
    – elcharlosmaster
    1 hour ago















up vote
0
down vote













I continue trying part (b). I write a separate answer because point (b) is much different than point (a) and the answer quite longer.



This solution is based on two lemmas. If $x_k=frac{k}{n}$




Lemma 1: $max_{0 le x le 1} x^{k}(1-x)^{n-k}=e^{-nH(x_k))}$. This should follow by simple calculus.




and:




Lemma 2: For every fixed $0 le k le n$, $argmax_{ 0 le m le n} {nchoose m} (x_k)^m(1-x_k)^{n-m}=k$ , i.e. the maximum is for $m=k$.



This should follow writing $m=k+a$ and verifying that the ratio between the quantity calculated for $a=0$ and $a$ different than zero is greater than one. This follows by writing the ratio and identifying it as a product of terms all greater than one.




Given Lemma 1 and Lemma2 we have the thesis. By the binomial theorem:



$sum_m {nchoose m} (x_k)^m(1-x_k)^{n-m} =1$



Therefore in particular the maximum addend, which is for $m=k$ by lemma 2, shall be greater than $frac{1}{n+1}$:



${nchoose m} (x_k)^m(1-x_k)^{n-m} ge frac{1}{n+1}$ [1]



By lemma 1:



${nchoose m}(x_k)^m(1-x_k)^{n-m} le {nchoose m}e^{-nH(x_k)}$ [2]



Comparing [1] and [2] we have the thesis.



I just outlined my procedure for proving the lammas but hopefully the are correct even if they require a bit of calculations!






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Hi, thank you for your time and comment. I am still working through it but am confused as to how you got lemma 1 and 2, i think i understand what you do once you have established the lemmas.
    – elcharlosmaster
    1 hour ago













up vote
0
down vote










up vote
0
down vote









I continue trying part (b). I write a separate answer because point (b) is much different than point (a) and the answer quite longer.



This solution is based on two lemmas. If $x_k=frac{k}{n}$




Lemma 1: $max_{0 le x le 1} x^{k}(1-x)^{n-k}=e^{-nH(x_k))}$. This should follow by simple calculus.




and:




Lemma 2: For every fixed $0 le k le n$, $argmax_{ 0 le m le n} {nchoose m} (x_k)^m(1-x_k)^{n-m}=k$ , i.e. the maximum is for $m=k$.



This should follow writing $m=k+a$ and verifying that the ratio between the quantity calculated for $a=0$ and $a$ different than zero is greater than one. This follows by writing the ratio and identifying it as a product of terms all greater than one.




Given Lemma 1 and Lemma2 we have the thesis. By the binomial theorem:



$sum_m {nchoose m} (x_k)^m(1-x_k)^{n-m} =1$



Therefore in particular the maximum addend, which is for $m=k$ by lemma 2, shall be greater than $frac{1}{n+1}$:



${nchoose m} (x_k)^m(1-x_k)^{n-m} ge frac{1}{n+1}$ [1]



By lemma 1:



${nchoose m}(x_k)^m(1-x_k)^{n-m} le {nchoose m}e^{-nH(x_k)}$ [2]



Comparing [1] and [2] we have the thesis.



I just outlined my procedure for proving the lammas but hopefully the are correct even if they require a bit of calculations!






share|cite|improve this answer














I continue trying part (b). I write a separate answer because point (b) is much different than point (a) and the answer quite longer.



This solution is based on two lemmas. If $x_k=frac{k}{n}$




Lemma 1: $max_{0 le x le 1} x^{k}(1-x)^{n-k}=e^{-nH(x_k))}$. This should follow by simple calculus.




and:




Lemma 2: For every fixed $0 le k le n$, $argmax_{ 0 le m le n} {nchoose m} (x_k)^m(1-x_k)^{n-m}=k$ , i.e. the maximum is for $m=k$.



This should follow writing $m=k+a$ and verifying that the ratio between the quantity calculated for $a=0$ and $a$ different than zero is greater than one. This follows by writing the ratio and identifying it as a product of terms all greater than one.




Given Lemma 1 and Lemma2 we have the thesis. By the binomial theorem:



$sum_m {nchoose m} (x_k)^m(1-x_k)^{n-m} =1$



Therefore in particular the maximum addend, which is for $m=k$ by lemma 2, shall be greater than $frac{1}{n+1}$:



${nchoose m} (x_k)^m(1-x_k)^{n-m} ge frac{1}{n+1}$ [1]



By lemma 1:



${nchoose m}(x_k)^m(1-x_k)^{n-m} le {nchoose m}e^{-nH(x_k)}$ [2]



Comparing [1] and [2] we have the thesis.



I just outlined my procedure for proving the lammas but hopefully the are correct even if they require a bit of calculations!







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited 2 hours ago

























answered 7 hours ago









Thomas

12318




12318












  • Hi, thank you for your time and comment. I am still working through it but am confused as to how you got lemma 1 and 2, i think i understand what you do once you have established the lemmas.
    – elcharlosmaster
    1 hour ago


















  • Hi, thank you for your time and comment. I am still working through it but am confused as to how you got lemma 1 and 2, i think i understand what you do once you have established the lemmas.
    – elcharlosmaster
    1 hour ago
















Hi, thank you for your time and comment. I am still working through it but am confused as to how you got lemma 1 and 2, i think i understand what you do once you have established the lemmas.
– elcharlosmaster
1 hour ago




Hi, thank you for your time and comment. I am still working through it but am confused as to how you got lemma 1 and 2, i think i understand what you do once you have established the lemmas.
– elcharlosmaster
1 hour ago


















 

draft saved


draft discarded



















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2998530%2fstrict-bernstein-inequality%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Quarter-circle Tiles

build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

Mont Emei