Strict Bernstein Inequality
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
We define the entropy function by
$$H(x)=xlnfrac{1}{x}+(1-x)lnfrac{1}{1-x} quad text{ for } 0 leq x leq 1 $$
where $H(0)=H(1)=0$.
a) For integers $0leq kleq n$ prove that
$$binom{n}{k} leq e^{ncdot H(x)} quad text{ for } x=frac{k}{n}. $$
$textit{Hint}$: use that $$ sum_{m=0}^nbinom{n}{m}x^m(1-x)^{n-m}=1 $$
b) For integers $0 leq k leq n$, prove that
$$binom{n}{k} geq frac{1}{n+1}e^{ncdot H(x)} quad text{ for } x=frac{k}{n}$$
$textit{Hint}$: use the hint for part a)
c) Let $X_1,X_2,...X_n$ be independent r.v. s.t. $$mathbf{P}(X_k=1)=frac{1}{2} text{ and } mathbf{P}(X_k=-1)=frac{1}{2} $$
Let $X=X_1+X_2+...+X_n$. Deduce from parts a) and b) that for any $0 leq alpha <1 $ $$lim_{n rightarrow infty}sqrt[n]{mathbf{P}(Xgeq alpha n)}=sqrt{frac{1}{(1-alpha)^{1-alpha}(1+alpha)^{1+alpha}}} $$
Attempt at a) we know $$ sum_{m=0}^nbinom{n}{m}x^m(1-x)^{n-m}=1 $$
$$begin{align} binom{n}{m}x^m(1-x)^{n-m} leq & ; 1 \ lnleft(binom{n}{m}right)+lnleft(x^mright)+lnleft((1-x)^{n-m}right)leq & ; 0 \ lnbinom{n}{m}leq &-(m)ln(x)-(n-m)ln(1-x) \ binom{n}{m} leq & ; e^{-mln(x)-(n-m)ln(1-x)}end{align}$$
Choosing $k=m$, and then letting $frac{k}{n}=x$:
$$begin{align} binom{n}{k} leq & ; e^{-kln(x)-(n-k)ln(1-x)} \ binom{n}{k} leq & ; e^{-nleft(frac{k}{n}ln(x)+(1-frac{k}{n})ln(1-x)right)} \ binom{n}{k} leq & ; e^{nleft(xln(frac{1}{x})+(1-x)ln(frac{1}{1-x})right)}\ binom{n}{k} leq & ; e^{nH(x)}end{align}$$
probability random-variables binomial-theorem
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
We define the entropy function by
$$H(x)=xlnfrac{1}{x}+(1-x)lnfrac{1}{1-x} quad text{ for } 0 leq x leq 1 $$
where $H(0)=H(1)=0$.
a) For integers $0leq kleq n$ prove that
$$binom{n}{k} leq e^{ncdot H(x)} quad text{ for } x=frac{k}{n}. $$
$textit{Hint}$: use that $$ sum_{m=0}^nbinom{n}{m}x^m(1-x)^{n-m}=1 $$
b) For integers $0 leq k leq n$, prove that
$$binom{n}{k} geq frac{1}{n+1}e^{ncdot H(x)} quad text{ for } x=frac{k}{n}$$
$textit{Hint}$: use the hint for part a)
c) Let $X_1,X_2,...X_n$ be independent r.v. s.t. $$mathbf{P}(X_k=1)=frac{1}{2} text{ and } mathbf{P}(X_k=-1)=frac{1}{2} $$
Let $X=X_1+X_2+...+X_n$. Deduce from parts a) and b) that for any $0 leq alpha <1 $ $$lim_{n rightarrow infty}sqrt[n]{mathbf{P}(Xgeq alpha n)}=sqrt{frac{1}{(1-alpha)^{1-alpha}(1+alpha)^{1+alpha}}} $$
Attempt at a) we know $$ sum_{m=0}^nbinom{n}{m}x^m(1-x)^{n-m}=1 $$
$$begin{align} binom{n}{m}x^m(1-x)^{n-m} leq & ; 1 \ lnleft(binom{n}{m}right)+lnleft(x^mright)+lnleft((1-x)^{n-m}right)leq & ; 0 \ lnbinom{n}{m}leq &-(m)ln(x)-(n-m)ln(1-x) \ binom{n}{m} leq & ; e^{-mln(x)-(n-m)ln(1-x)}end{align}$$
Choosing $k=m$, and then letting $frac{k}{n}=x$:
$$begin{align} binom{n}{k} leq & ; e^{-kln(x)-(n-k)ln(1-x)} \ binom{n}{k} leq & ; e^{-nleft(frac{k}{n}ln(x)+(1-frac{k}{n})ln(1-x)right)} \ binom{n}{k} leq & ; e^{nleft(xln(frac{1}{x})+(1-x)ln(frac{1}{1-x})right)}\ binom{n}{k} leq & ; e^{nH(x)}end{align}$$
probability random-variables binomial-theorem
math.stackexchange.com/questions/2998474/… linking these two.
– elcharlosmaster
Nov 14 at 17:25
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
We define the entropy function by
$$H(x)=xlnfrac{1}{x}+(1-x)lnfrac{1}{1-x} quad text{ for } 0 leq x leq 1 $$
where $H(0)=H(1)=0$.
a) For integers $0leq kleq n$ prove that
$$binom{n}{k} leq e^{ncdot H(x)} quad text{ for } x=frac{k}{n}. $$
$textit{Hint}$: use that $$ sum_{m=0}^nbinom{n}{m}x^m(1-x)^{n-m}=1 $$
b) For integers $0 leq k leq n$, prove that
$$binom{n}{k} geq frac{1}{n+1}e^{ncdot H(x)} quad text{ for } x=frac{k}{n}$$
$textit{Hint}$: use the hint for part a)
c) Let $X_1,X_2,...X_n$ be independent r.v. s.t. $$mathbf{P}(X_k=1)=frac{1}{2} text{ and } mathbf{P}(X_k=-1)=frac{1}{2} $$
Let $X=X_1+X_2+...+X_n$. Deduce from parts a) and b) that for any $0 leq alpha <1 $ $$lim_{n rightarrow infty}sqrt[n]{mathbf{P}(Xgeq alpha n)}=sqrt{frac{1}{(1-alpha)^{1-alpha}(1+alpha)^{1+alpha}}} $$
Attempt at a) we know $$ sum_{m=0}^nbinom{n}{m}x^m(1-x)^{n-m}=1 $$
$$begin{align} binom{n}{m}x^m(1-x)^{n-m} leq & ; 1 \ lnleft(binom{n}{m}right)+lnleft(x^mright)+lnleft((1-x)^{n-m}right)leq & ; 0 \ lnbinom{n}{m}leq &-(m)ln(x)-(n-m)ln(1-x) \ binom{n}{m} leq & ; e^{-mln(x)-(n-m)ln(1-x)}end{align}$$
Choosing $k=m$, and then letting $frac{k}{n}=x$:
$$begin{align} binom{n}{k} leq & ; e^{-kln(x)-(n-k)ln(1-x)} \ binom{n}{k} leq & ; e^{-nleft(frac{k}{n}ln(x)+(1-frac{k}{n})ln(1-x)right)} \ binom{n}{k} leq & ; e^{nleft(xln(frac{1}{x})+(1-x)ln(frac{1}{1-x})right)}\ binom{n}{k} leq & ; e^{nH(x)}end{align}$$
probability random-variables binomial-theorem
We define the entropy function by
$$H(x)=xlnfrac{1}{x}+(1-x)lnfrac{1}{1-x} quad text{ for } 0 leq x leq 1 $$
where $H(0)=H(1)=0$.
a) For integers $0leq kleq n$ prove that
$$binom{n}{k} leq e^{ncdot H(x)} quad text{ for } x=frac{k}{n}. $$
$textit{Hint}$: use that $$ sum_{m=0}^nbinom{n}{m}x^m(1-x)^{n-m}=1 $$
b) For integers $0 leq k leq n$, prove that
$$binom{n}{k} geq frac{1}{n+1}e^{ncdot H(x)} quad text{ for } x=frac{k}{n}$$
$textit{Hint}$: use the hint for part a)
c) Let $X_1,X_2,...X_n$ be independent r.v. s.t. $$mathbf{P}(X_k=1)=frac{1}{2} text{ and } mathbf{P}(X_k=-1)=frac{1}{2} $$
Let $X=X_1+X_2+...+X_n$. Deduce from parts a) and b) that for any $0 leq alpha <1 $ $$lim_{n rightarrow infty}sqrt[n]{mathbf{P}(Xgeq alpha n)}=sqrt{frac{1}{(1-alpha)^{1-alpha}(1+alpha)^{1+alpha}}} $$
Attempt at a) we know $$ sum_{m=0}^nbinom{n}{m}x^m(1-x)^{n-m}=1 $$
$$begin{align} binom{n}{m}x^m(1-x)^{n-m} leq & ; 1 \ lnleft(binom{n}{m}right)+lnleft(x^mright)+lnleft((1-x)^{n-m}right)leq & ; 0 \ lnbinom{n}{m}leq &-(m)ln(x)-(n-m)ln(1-x) \ binom{n}{m} leq & ; e^{-mln(x)-(n-m)ln(1-x)}end{align}$$
Choosing $k=m$, and then letting $frac{k}{n}=x$:
$$begin{align} binom{n}{k} leq & ; e^{-kln(x)-(n-k)ln(1-x)} \ binom{n}{k} leq & ; e^{-nleft(frac{k}{n}ln(x)+(1-frac{k}{n})ln(1-x)right)} \ binom{n}{k} leq & ; e^{nleft(xln(frac{1}{x})+(1-x)ln(frac{1}{1-x})right)}\ binom{n}{k} leq & ; e^{nH(x)}end{align}$$
probability random-variables binomial-theorem
probability random-variables binomial-theorem
edited 2 days ago
asked Nov 14 at 17:09
elcharlosmaster
1036
1036
math.stackexchange.com/questions/2998474/… linking these two.
– elcharlosmaster
Nov 14 at 17:25
add a comment |
math.stackexchange.com/questions/2998474/… linking these two.
– elcharlosmaster
Nov 14 at 17:25
math.stackexchange.com/questions/2998474/… linking these two.
– elcharlosmaster
Nov 14 at 17:25
math.stackexchange.com/questions/2998474/… linking these two.
– elcharlosmaster
Nov 14 at 17:25
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
I start with part (a). From the suggestion one has:
${nchoose{k}}x^k(1-x)^{n-k}le 1, 0le x le 1$
and taking logarithms:
$ln{nchoose{k}}le -k ln(x)-(n-k)ln(1-x), 0le x le 1$
The right member dipends on $x$ and has a minimum and $x=k/n$. Plugging this value one has the first inequality.
I tried with part (b) but in that case it is more problematic (for me) to use the hint of part 1...
– Thomas
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
I continue trying part (b). I write a separate answer because point (b) is much different than point (a) and the answer quite longer.
This solution is based on two lemmas. If $x_k=frac{k}{n}$
Lemma 1: $max_{0 le x le 1} x^{k}(1-x)^{n-k}=e^{-nH(x_k))}$. This should follow by simple calculus.
and:
Lemma 2: For every fixed $0 le k le n$, $argmax_{ 0 le m le n} {nchoose m} (x_k)^m(1-x_k)^{n-m}=k$ , i.e. the maximum is for $m=k$.
This should follow writing $m=k+a$ and verifying that the ratio between the quantity calculated for $a=0$ and $a$ different than zero is greater than one. This follows by writing the ratio and identifying it as a product of terms all greater than one.
Given Lemma 1 and Lemma2 we have the thesis. By the binomial theorem:
$sum_m {nchoose m} (x_k)^m(1-x_k)^{n-m} =1$
Therefore in particular the maximum addend, which is for $m=k$ by lemma 2, shall be greater than $frac{1}{n+1}$:
${nchoose m} (x_k)^m(1-x_k)^{n-m} ge frac{1}{n+1}$ [1]
By lemma 1:
${nchoose m}(x_k)^m(1-x_k)^{n-m} le {nchoose m}e^{-nH(x_k)}$ [2]
Comparing [1] and [2] we have the thesis.
I just outlined my procedure for proving the lammas but hopefully the are correct even if they require a bit of calculations!
Hi, thank you for your time and comment. I am still working through it but am confused as to how you got lemma 1 and 2, i think i understand what you do once you have established the lemmas.
– elcharlosmaster
1 hour ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
I start with part (a). From the suggestion one has:
${nchoose{k}}x^k(1-x)^{n-k}le 1, 0le x le 1$
and taking logarithms:
$ln{nchoose{k}}le -k ln(x)-(n-k)ln(1-x), 0le x le 1$
The right member dipends on $x$ and has a minimum and $x=k/n$. Plugging this value one has the first inequality.
I tried with part (b) but in that case it is more problematic (for me) to use the hint of part 1...
– Thomas
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
I start with part (a). From the suggestion one has:
${nchoose{k}}x^k(1-x)^{n-k}le 1, 0le x le 1$
and taking logarithms:
$ln{nchoose{k}}le -k ln(x)-(n-k)ln(1-x), 0le x le 1$
The right member dipends on $x$ and has a minimum and $x=k/n$. Plugging this value one has the first inequality.
I tried with part (b) but in that case it is more problematic (for me) to use the hint of part 1...
– Thomas
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
I start with part (a). From the suggestion one has:
${nchoose{k}}x^k(1-x)^{n-k}le 1, 0le x le 1$
and taking logarithms:
$ln{nchoose{k}}le -k ln(x)-(n-k)ln(1-x), 0le x le 1$
The right member dipends on $x$ and has a minimum and $x=k/n$. Plugging this value one has the first inequality.
I start with part (a). From the suggestion one has:
${nchoose{k}}x^k(1-x)^{n-k}le 1, 0le x le 1$
and taking logarithms:
$ln{nchoose{k}}le -k ln(x)-(n-k)ln(1-x), 0le x le 1$
The right member dipends on $x$ and has a minimum and $x=k/n$. Plugging this value one has the first inequality.
answered 2 days ago
Thomas
12318
12318
I tried with part (b) but in that case it is more problematic (for me) to use the hint of part 1...
– Thomas
yesterday
add a comment |
I tried with part (b) but in that case it is more problematic (for me) to use the hint of part 1...
– Thomas
yesterday
I tried with part (b) but in that case it is more problematic (for me) to use the hint of part 1...
– Thomas
yesterday
I tried with part (b) but in that case it is more problematic (for me) to use the hint of part 1...
– Thomas
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
I continue trying part (b). I write a separate answer because point (b) is much different than point (a) and the answer quite longer.
This solution is based on two lemmas. If $x_k=frac{k}{n}$
Lemma 1: $max_{0 le x le 1} x^{k}(1-x)^{n-k}=e^{-nH(x_k))}$. This should follow by simple calculus.
and:
Lemma 2: For every fixed $0 le k le n$, $argmax_{ 0 le m le n} {nchoose m} (x_k)^m(1-x_k)^{n-m}=k$ , i.e. the maximum is for $m=k$.
This should follow writing $m=k+a$ and verifying that the ratio between the quantity calculated for $a=0$ and $a$ different than zero is greater than one. This follows by writing the ratio and identifying it as a product of terms all greater than one.
Given Lemma 1 and Lemma2 we have the thesis. By the binomial theorem:
$sum_m {nchoose m} (x_k)^m(1-x_k)^{n-m} =1$
Therefore in particular the maximum addend, which is for $m=k$ by lemma 2, shall be greater than $frac{1}{n+1}$:
${nchoose m} (x_k)^m(1-x_k)^{n-m} ge frac{1}{n+1}$ [1]
By lemma 1:
${nchoose m}(x_k)^m(1-x_k)^{n-m} le {nchoose m}e^{-nH(x_k)}$ [2]
Comparing [1] and [2] we have the thesis.
I just outlined my procedure for proving the lammas but hopefully the are correct even if they require a bit of calculations!
Hi, thank you for your time and comment. I am still working through it but am confused as to how you got lemma 1 and 2, i think i understand what you do once you have established the lemmas.
– elcharlosmaster
1 hour ago
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
I continue trying part (b). I write a separate answer because point (b) is much different than point (a) and the answer quite longer.
This solution is based on two lemmas. If $x_k=frac{k}{n}$
Lemma 1: $max_{0 le x le 1} x^{k}(1-x)^{n-k}=e^{-nH(x_k))}$. This should follow by simple calculus.
and:
Lemma 2: For every fixed $0 le k le n$, $argmax_{ 0 le m le n} {nchoose m} (x_k)^m(1-x_k)^{n-m}=k$ , i.e. the maximum is for $m=k$.
This should follow writing $m=k+a$ and verifying that the ratio between the quantity calculated for $a=0$ and $a$ different than zero is greater than one. This follows by writing the ratio and identifying it as a product of terms all greater than one.
Given Lemma 1 and Lemma2 we have the thesis. By the binomial theorem:
$sum_m {nchoose m} (x_k)^m(1-x_k)^{n-m} =1$
Therefore in particular the maximum addend, which is for $m=k$ by lemma 2, shall be greater than $frac{1}{n+1}$:
${nchoose m} (x_k)^m(1-x_k)^{n-m} ge frac{1}{n+1}$ [1]
By lemma 1:
${nchoose m}(x_k)^m(1-x_k)^{n-m} le {nchoose m}e^{-nH(x_k)}$ [2]
Comparing [1] and [2] we have the thesis.
I just outlined my procedure for proving the lammas but hopefully the are correct even if they require a bit of calculations!
Hi, thank you for your time and comment. I am still working through it but am confused as to how you got lemma 1 and 2, i think i understand what you do once you have established the lemmas.
– elcharlosmaster
1 hour ago
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
I continue trying part (b). I write a separate answer because point (b) is much different than point (a) and the answer quite longer.
This solution is based on two lemmas. If $x_k=frac{k}{n}$
Lemma 1: $max_{0 le x le 1} x^{k}(1-x)^{n-k}=e^{-nH(x_k))}$. This should follow by simple calculus.
and:
Lemma 2: For every fixed $0 le k le n$, $argmax_{ 0 le m le n} {nchoose m} (x_k)^m(1-x_k)^{n-m}=k$ , i.e. the maximum is for $m=k$.
This should follow writing $m=k+a$ and verifying that the ratio between the quantity calculated for $a=0$ and $a$ different than zero is greater than one. This follows by writing the ratio and identifying it as a product of terms all greater than one.
Given Lemma 1 and Lemma2 we have the thesis. By the binomial theorem:
$sum_m {nchoose m} (x_k)^m(1-x_k)^{n-m} =1$
Therefore in particular the maximum addend, which is for $m=k$ by lemma 2, shall be greater than $frac{1}{n+1}$:
${nchoose m} (x_k)^m(1-x_k)^{n-m} ge frac{1}{n+1}$ [1]
By lemma 1:
${nchoose m}(x_k)^m(1-x_k)^{n-m} le {nchoose m}e^{-nH(x_k)}$ [2]
Comparing [1] and [2] we have the thesis.
I just outlined my procedure for proving the lammas but hopefully the are correct even if they require a bit of calculations!
I continue trying part (b). I write a separate answer because point (b) is much different than point (a) and the answer quite longer.
This solution is based on two lemmas. If $x_k=frac{k}{n}$
Lemma 1: $max_{0 le x le 1} x^{k}(1-x)^{n-k}=e^{-nH(x_k))}$. This should follow by simple calculus.
and:
Lemma 2: For every fixed $0 le k le n$, $argmax_{ 0 le m le n} {nchoose m} (x_k)^m(1-x_k)^{n-m}=k$ , i.e. the maximum is for $m=k$.
This should follow writing $m=k+a$ and verifying that the ratio between the quantity calculated for $a=0$ and $a$ different than zero is greater than one. This follows by writing the ratio and identifying it as a product of terms all greater than one.
Given Lemma 1 and Lemma2 we have the thesis. By the binomial theorem:
$sum_m {nchoose m} (x_k)^m(1-x_k)^{n-m} =1$
Therefore in particular the maximum addend, which is for $m=k$ by lemma 2, shall be greater than $frac{1}{n+1}$:
${nchoose m} (x_k)^m(1-x_k)^{n-m} ge frac{1}{n+1}$ [1]
By lemma 1:
${nchoose m}(x_k)^m(1-x_k)^{n-m} le {nchoose m}e^{-nH(x_k)}$ [2]
Comparing [1] and [2] we have the thesis.
I just outlined my procedure for proving the lammas but hopefully the are correct even if they require a bit of calculations!
edited 2 hours ago
answered 7 hours ago
Thomas
12318
12318
Hi, thank you for your time and comment. I am still working through it but am confused as to how you got lemma 1 and 2, i think i understand what you do once you have established the lemmas.
– elcharlosmaster
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Hi, thank you for your time and comment. I am still working through it but am confused as to how you got lemma 1 and 2, i think i understand what you do once you have established the lemmas.
– elcharlosmaster
1 hour ago
Hi, thank you for your time and comment. I am still working through it but am confused as to how you got lemma 1 and 2, i think i understand what you do once you have established the lemmas.
– elcharlosmaster
1 hour ago
Hi, thank you for your time and comment. I am still working through it but am confused as to how you got lemma 1 and 2, i think i understand what you do once you have established the lemmas.
– elcharlosmaster
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2998530%2fstrict-bernstein-inequality%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
math.stackexchange.com/questions/2998474/… linking these two.
– elcharlosmaster
Nov 14 at 17:25