Is there such a thing as a “minimal soap” molecule?
up vote
14
down vote
favorite
Wikipedia's Soap gives sodium stearate as an example of soap, and apparently I've been eating it:
Sodium stearate is the sodium salt of stearic acid. This white solid is the most common soap. It is found in many types of solid deodorants, rubbers, latex paints, and inks. It is also a component of some food additives and food flavorings.
What would be the smallest or simplest molecule that we could reasonably call a soap? Perhaps a functional definition would be that it could perform some of the functions of soap in the same way that soap does.
In Why does bleach feel slippery? and its follow-up Is it known for sure that bases feel slippery because of the production of soap/surfactant? the saponification of other existing molecules is discussed, and I'm not looking for that here.
Source
everyday-chemistry surfactants
edited 2 days ago
A.K.
8,05441860
asked Nov 14 at 4:59
uhoh
1,450833
add a comment |
up vote
14
down vote
favorite
Wikipedia's Soap gives sodium stearate as an example of soap, and apparently I've been eating it:
Sodium stearate is the sodium salt of stearic acid. This white solid is the most common soap. It is found in many types of solid deodorants, rubbers, latex paints, and inks. It is also a component of some food additives and food flavorings.
What would be the smallest or simplest molecule that we could reasonably call a soap? Perhaps a functional definition would be that it could perform some of the functions of soap in the same way that soap does.
In Why does bleach feel slippery? and its follow-up Is it known for sure that bases feel slippery because of the production of soap/surfactant? the saponification of other existing molecules is discussed, and I'm not looking for that here.
Source
everyday-chemistry surfactants
edited 2 days ago
A.K.
8,05441860
asked Nov 14 at 4:59
uhoh
1,450833
add a comment |
up vote
14
down vote
favorite
up vote
14
down vote
favorite
Wikipedia's Soap gives sodium stearate as an example of soap, and apparently I've been eating it:
Sodium stearate is the sodium salt of stearic acid. This white solid is the most common soap. It is found in many types of solid deodorants, rubbers, latex paints, and inks. It is also a component of some food additives and food flavorings.
What would be the smallest or simplest molecule that we could reasonably call a soap? Perhaps a functional definition would be that it could perform some of the functions of soap in the same way that soap does.
In Why does bleach feel slippery? and its follow-up Is it known for sure that bases feel slippery because of the production of soap/surfactant? the saponification of other existing molecules is discussed, and I'm not looking for that here.
Source
everyday-chemistry surfactants
edited 2 days ago
A.K.
8,05441860
asked Nov 14 at 4:59
uhoh
1,450833
Wikipedia's Soap gives sodium stearate as an example of soap, and apparently I've been eating it:
Sodium stearate is the sodium salt of stearic acid. This white solid is the most common soap. It is found in many types of solid deodorants, rubbers, latex paints, and inks. It is also a component of some food additives and food flavorings.
What would be the smallest or simplest molecule that we could reasonably call a soap? Perhaps a functional definition would be that it could perform some of the functions of soap in the same way that soap does.
In Why does bleach feel slippery? and its follow-up Is it known for sure that bases feel slippery because of the production of soap/surfactant? the saponification of other existing molecules is discussed, and I'm not looking for that here.
Source
everyday-chemistry surfactants
everyday-chemistry surfactants
edited 2 days ago
A.K.
8,05441860
asked Nov 14 at 4:59
uhoh
1,450833
edited 2 days ago
A.K.
8,05441860
asked Nov 14 at 4:59
uhoh
1,450833
edited 2 days ago
A.K.
8,05441860
edited 2 days ago
A.K.
8,05441860
edited 2 days ago
A.K.
8,05441860
8,05441860
asked Nov 14 at 4:59
uhoh
1,450833
asked Nov 14 at 4:59
uhoh
1,450833
asked Nov 14 at 4:59
uhoh
1,450833
1,450833
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
up vote
25
down vote
It boils down to the definition of soap. Wikipedia defines a soap as the salt of a fatty acid.
IUPAC claims the smallest fatty acid can be considered to have 4 carbons.
Therefore the simplest soap molecule would be a (generally sodium) salt of butyric (butanoic) acid, i.e. sodium butyrate.
Now apart from the chemical definition, a soap must adhere to its function in order to be defined as such. Therefore, before calling something a soap, we would have to know if the substance does in fact act as a surfactant in a oil-water surface (reducing the interfacial tension) - but that will depend on the nature of the oil in question and the purity of the water. Only for a well defined system we can then conclude that such molecular salt is acting as a soap in it.
answered Nov 14 at 5:55
Vinícius Godim
99418
10
There is another dimension to Vinicius' answer. I doubt there is a real yes or no answer to if a compound is a surfactant. It is more a matter of how good of a surfactant a particular compound is. Since vinegar is often used as a cleaning solution, I'd guess that sodium butyrate would remove a finger print off glass very well.
– MaxW
Nov 14 at 8:47
2
@uhoh: For practical purposes, I'd say the biggest issue with using sodium butyrate as a cleaning agent would be its rather nasty rancid smell. Basically, imagine something like the concentrated essence of stinky cheese, gym socks and vomit.
– Ilmari Karonen
Nov 14 at 13:45
1
@MaxW But is it the surfactant qualities of vinegar which are being used in cleaning, or is it some other property? (e.g. the acidity) -- I wonder if sodium acetate would work as well.
– R.M.
Nov 14 at 16:02
1
@uhoh When I started to write the new question, of what is the shortest fatty-acid molecule, I found that this question had been asked as part of another question on this site. Unfortunately the only answer doesn't actually go further than my comment above. Perhaps the answer is that there is no actual bound other than the obvious 1-carbon limit, but that it is rather arbitrary what counts as a 'proper' fatty acid. I suggest answering or commenting on that question if anyone has any views.
– David Robinson
2 days ago
1
@A.K. - Understand but a "large" change in interface surface would indicate a surfactant, but a "small" change wouldn't. The problem is that the difference between "large" and "small" is fuzzy.
– MaxW
2 days ago
|
show 7 more comments
up vote
7
down vote
While I agree that the definition matters I disagree with the definition of soap as "as the salt of a fatty acid". For one SDBS, AOT, SDS, Cocamide DEA (not even a salt) and CTAB are all popular soaps that are not fatty acid salts. I also do not think that soap and surfactant are interchangeable words. Surfactants lower surface tension, soaps create micelles either by them selves or with oils. Essentially all soaps are surfactants but not all surfacants are soaps. For example, ethanol may be considered a surfactant as it does reduce the surface tension of water, but it does not help form micelles in water appreciably and thus should not be considered a soap.
What would be the smallest or simplest molecule that we could reasonably call a soap?
This is somewhat a matter of estimate, but given that propionic acid is not micible with water and acetic acid is, I would assert that sodium (or other alkali metal) propionate is the simplest soap since it has an aliphatic group to interact with an oil phase, yet has carboxylate salt "head" to retain interaction with the water phase. It is possible sodium acetate may do so as well but empirical data is needed. I suppose technically lithium salts would be the smallest since the lithium ion is smaller than the sodium ion, but that is perhaps too technical and may not interact with water as strongly as sodium salts.
answered 2 days ago
A.K.
8,05441860
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
As always, there is no sharp border and no minimal molecule. You can make the head piece more charged, which means the molecule becomes more hydrophillic and water soluble and you can make the tail piece shorter, so it will not bind fats very well anymore and fails to form micelles at some point.
Consequently, the question makes no sense, because the issue is a task-specific trade-of and the term soap is too broad. It is not even clear, whether you want a detergent for water or a e.g. fluorinated oil.
answered 2 days ago
dgrat
14217
"the question makes no sense" Apparently it makes some sense to several people.
– uhoh
2 days ago
No it does not make any sense, because of a too drastic oversimplification. The correct question would be, "what influences the property of a "soap" in a certain solvent".
– dgrat
2 days ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
25
down vote
It boils down to the definition of soap. Wikipedia defines a soap as the salt of a fatty acid.
IUPAC claims the smallest fatty acid can be considered to have 4 carbons.
Therefore the simplest soap molecule would be a (generally sodium) salt of butyric (butanoic) acid, i.e. sodium butyrate.
Now apart from the chemical definition, a soap must adhere to its function in order to be defined as such. Therefore, before calling something a soap, we would have to know if the substance does in fact act as a surfactant in a oil-water surface (reducing the interfacial tension) - but that will depend on the nature of the oil in question and the purity of the water. Only for a well defined system we can then conclude that such molecular salt is acting as a soap in it.
answered Nov 14 at 5:55
Vinícius Godim
99418
10
There is another dimension to Vinicius' answer. I doubt there is a real yes or no answer to if a compound is a surfactant. It is more a matter of how good of a surfactant a particular compound is. Since vinegar is often used as a cleaning solution, I'd guess that sodium butyrate would remove a finger print off glass very well.
– MaxW
Nov 14 at 8:47
2
@uhoh: For practical purposes, I'd say the biggest issue with using sodium butyrate as a cleaning agent would be its rather nasty rancid smell. Basically, imagine something like the concentrated essence of stinky cheese, gym socks and vomit.
– Ilmari Karonen
Nov 14 at 13:45
1
@MaxW But is it the surfactant qualities of vinegar which are being used in cleaning, or is it some other property? (e.g. the acidity) -- I wonder if sodium acetate would work as well.
– R.M.
Nov 14 at 16:02
1
@uhoh When I started to write the new question, of what is the shortest fatty-acid molecule, I found that this question had been asked as part of another question on this site. Unfortunately the only answer doesn't actually go further than my comment above. Perhaps the answer is that there is no actual bound other than the obvious 1-carbon limit, but that it is rather arbitrary what counts as a 'proper' fatty acid. I suggest answering or commenting on that question if anyone has any views.
– David Robinson
2 days ago
1
@A.K. - Understand but a "large" change in interface surface would indicate a surfactant, but a "small" change wouldn't. The problem is that the difference between "large" and "small" is fuzzy.
– MaxW
2 days ago
|
show 7 more comments
up vote
25
down vote
It boils down to the definition of soap. Wikipedia defines a soap as the salt of a fatty acid.
IUPAC claims the smallest fatty acid can be considered to have 4 carbons.
Therefore the simplest soap molecule would be a (generally sodium) salt of butyric (butanoic) acid, i.e. sodium butyrate.
Now apart from the chemical definition, a soap must adhere to its function in order to be defined as such. Therefore, before calling something a soap, we would have to know if the substance does in fact act as a surfactant in a oil-water surface (reducing the interfacial tension) - but that will depend on the nature of the oil in question and the purity of the water. Only for a well defined system we can then conclude that such molecular salt is acting as a soap in it.
answered Nov 14 at 5:55
Vinícius Godim
99418
10
There is another dimension to Vinicius' answer. I doubt there is a real yes or no answer to if a compound is a surfactant. It is more a matter of how good of a surfactant a particular compound is. Since vinegar is often used as a cleaning solution, I'd guess that sodium butyrate would remove a finger print off glass very well.
– MaxW
Nov 14 at 8:47
2
@uhoh: For practical purposes, I'd say the biggest issue with using sodium butyrate as a cleaning agent would be its rather nasty rancid smell. Basically, imagine something like the concentrated essence of stinky cheese, gym socks and vomit.
– Ilmari Karonen
Nov 14 at 13:45
1
@MaxW But is it the surfactant qualities of vinegar which are being used in cleaning, or is it some other property? (e.g. the acidity) -- I wonder if sodium acetate would work as well.
– R.M.
Nov 14 at 16:02
1
@uhoh When I started to write the new question, of what is the shortest fatty-acid molecule, I found that this question had been asked as part of another question on this site. Unfortunately the only answer doesn't actually go further than my comment above. Perhaps the answer is that there is no actual bound other than the obvious 1-carbon limit, but that it is rather arbitrary what counts as a 'proper' fatty acid. I suggest answering or commenting on that question if anyone has any views.
– David Robinson
2 days ago
1
@A.K. - Understand but a "large" change in interface surface would indicate a surfactant, but a "small" change wouldn't. The problem is that the difference between "large" and "small" is fuzzy.
– MaxW
2 days ago
|
show 7 more comments
up vote
25
down vote
up vote
25
down vote
It boils down to the definition of soap. Wikipedia defines a soap as the salt of a fatty acid.
IUPAC claims the smallest fatty acid can be considered to have 4 carbons.
Therefore the simplest soap molecule would be a (generally sodium) salt of butyric (butanoic) acid, i.e. sodium butyrate.
Now apart from the chemical definition, a soap must adhere to its function in order to be defined as such. Therefore, before calling something a soap, we would have to know if the substance does in fact act as a surfactant in a oil-water surface (reducing the interfacial tension) - but that will depend on the nature of the oil in question and the purity of the water. Only for a well defined system we can then conclude that such molecular salt is acting as a soap in it.
answered Nov 14 at 5:55
Vinícius Godim
99418
It boils down to the definition of soap. Wikipedia defines a soap as the salt of a fatty acid.
IUPAC claims the smallest fatty acid can be considered to have 4 carbons.
Therefore the simplest soap molecule would be a (generally sodium) salt of butyric (butanoic) acid, i.e. sodium butyrate.
Now apart from the chemical definition, a soap must adhere to its function in order to be defined as such. Therefore, before calling something a soap, we would have to know if the substance does in fact act as a surfactant in a oil-water surface (reducing the interfacial tension) - but that will depend on the nature of the oil in question and the purity of the water. Only for a well defined system we can then conclude that such molecular salt is acting as a soap in it.
answered Nov 14 at 5:55
Vinícius Godim
99418
answered Nov 14 at 5:55
Vinícius Godim
99418
answered Nov 14 at 5:55
Vinícius Godim
99418
answered Nov 14 at 5:55
Vinícius Godim
99418
99418
10
There is another dimension to Vinicius' answer. I doubt there is a real yes or no answer to if a compound is a surfactant. It is more a matter of how good of a surfactant a particular compound is. Since vinegar is often used as a cleaning solution, I'd guess that sodium butyrate would remove a finger print off glass very well.
– MaxW
Nov 14 at 8:47
2
@uhoh: For practical purposes, I'd say the biggest issue with using sodium butyrate as a cleaning agent would be its rather nasty rancid smell. Basically, imagine something like the concentrated essence of stinky cheese, gym socks and vomit.
– Ilmari Karonen
Nov 14 at 13:45
1
@MaxW But is it the surfactant qualities of vinegar which are being used in cleaning, or is it some other property? (e.g. the acidity) -- I wonder if sodium acetate would work as well.
– R.M.
Nov 14 at 16:02
1
@uhoh When I started to write the new question, of what is the shortest fatty-acid molecule, I found that this question had been asked as part of another question on this site. Unfortunately the only answer doesn't actually go further than my comment above. Perhaps the answer is that there is no actual bound other than the obvious 1-carbon limit, but that it is rather arbitrary what counts as a 'proper' fatty acid. I suggest answering or commenting on that question if anyone has any views.
– David Robinson
2 days ago
1
@A.K. - Understand but a "large" change in interface surface would indicate a surfactant, but a "small" change wouldn't. The problem is that the difference between "large" and "small" is fuzzy.
– MaxW
2 days ago
|
show 7 more comments
10
There is another dimension to Vinicius' answer. I doubt there is a real yes or no answer to if a compound is a surfactant. It is more a matter of how good of a surfactant a particular compound is. Since vinegar is often used as a cleaning solution, I'd guess that sodium butyrate would remove a finger print off glass very well.
– MaxW
Nov 14 at 8:47
2
@uhoh: For practical purposes, I'd say the biggest issue with using sodium butyrate as a cleaning agent would be its rather nasty rancid smell. Basically, imagine something like the concentrated essence of stinky cheese, gym socks and vomit.
– Ilmari Karonen
Nov 14 at 13:45
1
@MaxW But is it the surfactant qualities of vinegar which are being used in cleaning, or is it some other property? (e.g. the acidity) -- I wonder if sodium acetate would work as well.
– R.M.
Nov 14 at 16:02
1
@uhoh When I started to write the new question, of what is the shortest fatty-acid molecule, I found that this question had been asked as part of another question on this site. Unfortunately the only answer doesn't actually go further than my comment above. Perhaps the answer is that there is no actual bound other than the obvious 1-carbon limit, but that it is rather arbitrary what counts as a 'proper' fatty acid. I suggest answering or commenting on that question if anyone has any views.
– David Robinson
2 days ago
1
@A.K. - Understand but a "large" change in interface surface would indicate a surfactant, but a "small" change wouldn't. The problem is that the difference between "large" and "small" is fuzzy.
– MaxW
2 days ago
10
10
There is another dimension to Vinicius' answer. I doubt there is a real yes or no answer to if a compound is a surfactant. It is more a matter of how good of a surfactant a particular compound is. Since vinegar is often used as a cleaning solution, I'd guess that sodium butyrate would remove a finger print off glass very well.
– MaxW
Nov 14 at 8:47
There is another dimension to Vinicius' answer. I doubt there is a real yes or no answer to if a compound is a surfactant. It is more a matter of how good of a surfactant a particular compound is. Since vinegar is often used as a cleaning solution, I'd guess that sodium butyrate would remove a finger print off glass very well.
– MaxW
Nov 14 at 8:47
2
2
@uhoh: For practical purposes, I'd say the biggest issue with using sodium butyrate as a cleaning agent would be its rather nasty rancid smell. Basically, imagine something like the concentrated essence of stinky cheese, gym socks and vomit.
– Ilmari Karonen
Nov 14 at 13:45
@uhoh: For practical purposes, I'd say the biggest issue with using sodium butyrate as a cleaning agent would be its rather nasty rancid smell. Basically, imagine something like the concentrated essence of stinky cheese, gym socks and vomit.
– Ilmari Karonen
Nov 14 at 13:45
1
1
@MaxW But is it the surfactant qualities of vinegar which are being used in cleaning, or is it some other property? (e.g. the acidity) -- I wonder if sodium acetate would work as well.
– R.M.
Nov 14 at 16:02
@MaxW But is it the surfactant qualities of vinegar which are being used in cleaning, or is it some other property? (e.g. the acidity) -- I wonder if sodium acetate would work as well.
– R.M.
Nov 14 at 16:02
1
1
@uhoh When I started to write the new question, of what is the shortest fatty-acid molecule, I found that this question had been asked as part of another question on this site. Unfortunately the only answer doesn't actually go further than my comment above. Perhaps the answer is that there is no actual bound other than the obvious 1-carbon limit, but that it is rather arbitrary what counts as a 'proper' fatty acid. I suggest answering or commenting on that question if anyone has any views.
– David Robinson
2 days ago
@uhoh When I started to write the new question, of what is the shortest fatty-acid molecule, I found that this question had been asked as part of another question on this site. Unfortunately the only answer doesn't actually go further than my comment above. Perhaps the answer is that there is no actual bound other than the obvious 1-carbon limit, but that it is rather arbitrary what counts as a 'proper' fatty acid. I suggest answering or commenting on that question if anyone has any views.
– David Robinson
2 days ago
1
1
@A.K. - Understand but a "large" change in interface surface would indicate a surfactant, but a "small" change wouldn't. The problem is that the difference between "large" and "small" is fuzzy.
– MaxW
2 days ago
@A.K. - Understand but a "large" change in interface surface would indicate a surfactant, but a "small" change wouldn't. The problem is that the difference between "large" and "small" is fuzzy.
– MaxW
2 days ago
|
show 7 more comments
up vote
7
down vote
While I agree that the definition matters I disagree with the definition of soap as "as the salt of a fatty acid". For one SDBS, AOT, SDS, Cocamide DEA (not even a salt) and CTAB are all popular soaps that are not fatty acid salts. I also do not think that soap and surfactant are interchangeable words. Surfactants lower surface tension, soaps create micelles either by them selves or with oils. Essentially all soaps are surfactants but not all surfacants are soaps. For example, ethanol may be considered a surfactant as it does reduce the surface tension of water, but it does not help form micelles in water appreciably and thus should not be considered a soap.
What would be the smallest or simplest molecule that we could reasonably call a soap?
This is somewhat a matter of estimate, but given that propionic acid is not micible with water and acetic acid is, I would assert that sodium (or other alkali metal) propionate is the simplest soap since it has an aliphatic group to interact with an oil phase, yet has carboxylate salt "head" to retain interaction with the water phase. It is possible sodium acetate may do so as well but empirical data is needed. I suppose technically lithium salts would be the smallest since the lithium ion is smaller than the sodium ion, but that is perhaps too technical and may not interact with water as strongly as sodium salts.
answered 2 days ago
A.K.
8,05441860
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
While I agree that the definition matters I disagree with the definition of soap as "as the salt of a fatty acid". For one SDBS, AOT, SDS, Cocamide DEA (not even a salt) and CTAB are all popular soaps that are not fatty acid salts. I also do not think that soap and surfactant are interchangeable words. Surfactants lower surface tension, soaps create micelles either by them selves or with oils. Essentially all soaps are surfactants but not all surfacants are soaps. For example, ethanol may be considered a surfactant as it does reduce the surface tension of water, but it does not help form micelles in water appreciably and thus should not be considered a soap.
What would be the smallest or simplest molecule that we could reasonably call a soap?
This is somewhat a matter of estimate, but given that propionic acid is not micible with water and acetic acid is, I would assert that sodium (or other alkali metal) propionate is the simplest soap since it has an aliphatic group to interact with an oil phase, yet has carboxylate salt "head" to retain interaction with the water phase. It is possible sodium acetate may do so as well but empirical data is needed. I suppose technically lithium salts would be the smallest since the lithium ion is smaller than the sodium ion, but that is perhaps too technical and may not interact with water as strongly as sodium salts.
answered 2 days ago
A.K.
8,05441860
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
up vote
7
down vote
While I agree that the definition matters I disagree with the definition of soap as "as the salt of a fatty acid". For one SDBS, AOT, SDS, Cocamide DEA (not even a salt) and CTAB are all popular soaps that are not fatty acid salts. I also do not think that soap and surfactant are interchangeable words. Surfactants lower surface tension, soaps create micelles either by them selves or with oils. Essentially all soaps are surfactants but not all surfacants are soaps. For example, ethanol may be considered a surfactant as it does reduce the surface tension of water, but it does not help form micelles in water appreciably and thus should not be considered a soap.
What would be the smallest or simplest molecule that we could reasonably call a soap?
This is somewhat a matter of estimate, but given that propionic acid is not micible with water and acetic acid is, I would assert that sodium (or other alkali metal) propionate is the simplest soap since it has an aliphatic group to interact with an oil phase, yet has carboxylate salt "head" to retain interaction with the water phase. It is possible sodium acetate may do so as well but empirical data is needed. I suppose technically lithium salts would be the smallest since the lithium ion is smaller than the sodium ion, but that is perhaps too technical and may not interact with water as strongly as sodium salts.
answered 2 days ago
A.K.
8,05441860
While I agree that the definition matters I disagree with the definition of soap as "as the salt of a fatty acid". For one SDBS, AOT, SDS, Cocamide DEA (not even a salt) and CTAB are all popular soaps that are not fatty acid salts. I also do not think that soap and surfactant are interchangeable words. Surfactants lower surface tension, soaps create micelles either by them selves or with oils. Essentially all soaps are surfactants but not all surfacants are soaps. For example, ethanol may be considered a surfactant as it does reduce the surface tension of water, but it does not help form micelles in water appreciably and thus should not be considered a soap.
What would be the smallest or simplest molecule that we could reasonably call a soap?
This is somewhat a matter of estimate, but given that propionic acid is not micible with water and acetic acid is, I would assert that sodium (or other alkali metal) propionate is the simplest soap since it has an aliphatic group to interact with an oil phase, yet has carboxylate salt "head" to retain interaction with the water phase. It is possible sodium acetate may do so as well but empirical data is needed. I suppose technically lithium salts would be the smallest since the lithium ion is smaller than the sodium ion, but that is perhaps too technical and may not interact with water as strongly as sodium salts.
answered 2 days ago
A.K.
8,05441860
edited 2 days ago
answered 2 days ago
A.K.
8,05441860
answered 2 days ago
A.K.
8,05441860
answered 2 days ago
A.K.
8,05441860
8,05441860
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
As always, there is no sharp border and no minimal molecule. You can make the head piece more charged, which means the molecule becomes more hydrophillic and water soluble and you can make the tail piece shorter, so it will not bind fats very well anymore and fails to form micelles at some point.
Consequently, the question makes no sense, because the issue is a task-specific trade-of and the term soap is too broad. It is not even clear, whether you want a detergent for water or a e.g. fluorinated oil.
answered 2 days ago
dgrat
14217
"the question makes no sense" Apparently it makes some sense to several people.
– uhoh
2 days ago
No it does not make any sense, because of a too drastic oversimplification. The correct question would be, "what influences the property of a "soap" in a certain solvent".
– dgrat
2 days ago
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
As always, there is no sharp border and no minimal molecule. You can make the head piece more charged, which means the molecule becomes more hydrophillic and water soluble and you can make the tail piece shorter, so it will not bind fats very well anymore and fails to form micelles at some point.
Consequently, the question makes no sense, because the issue is a task-specific trade-of and the term soap is too broad. It is not even clear, whether you want a detergent for water or a e.g. fluorinated oil.
answered 2 days ago
dgrat
14217
"the question makes no sense" Apparently it makes some sense to several people.
– uhoh
2 days ago
No it does not make any sense, because of a too drastic oversimplification. The correct question would be, "what influences the property of a "soap" in a certain solvent".
– dgrat
2 days ago
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
As always, there is no sharp border and no minimal molecule. You can make the head piece more charged, which means the molecule becomes more hydrophillic and water soluble and you can make the tail piece shorter, so it will not bind fats very well anymore and fails to form micelles at some point.
Consequently, the question makes no sense, because the issue is a task-specific trade-of and the term soap is too broad. It is not even clear, whether you want a detergent for water or a e.g. fluorinated oil.
answered 2 days ago
dgrat
14217
As always, there is no sharp border and no minimal molecule. You can make the head piece more charged, which means the molecule becomes more hydrophillic and water soluble and you can make the tail piece shorter, so it will not bind fats very well anymore and fails to form micelles at some point.
Consequently, the question makes no sense, because the issue is a task-specific trade-of and the term soap is too broad. It is not even clear, whether you want a detergent for water or a e.g. fluorinated oil.
answered 2 days ago
dgrat
14217
answered 2 days ago
dgrat
14217
answered 2 days ago
dgrat
14217
answered 2 days ago
dgrat
14217
14217
"the question makes no sense" Apparently it makes some sense to several people.
– uhoh
2 days ago
No it does not make any sense, because of a too drastic oversimplification. The correct question would be, "what influences the property of a "soap" in a certain solvent".
– dgrat
2 days ago
add a comment |
"the question makes no sense" Apparently it makes some sense to several people.
– uhoh
2 days ago
No it does not make any sense, because of a too drastic oversimplification. The correct question would be, "what influences the property of a "soap" in a certain solvent".
– dgrat
2 days ago
"the question makes no sense" Apparently it makes some sense to several people.
– uhoh
2 days ago
"the question makes no sense" Apparently it makes some sense to several people.
– uhoh
2 days ago
No it does not make any sense, because of a too drastic oversimplification. The correct question would be, "what influences the property of a "soap" in a certain solvent".
– dgrat
2 days ago
No it does not make any sense, because of a too drastic oversimplification. The correct question would be, "what influences the property of a "soap" in a certain solvent".
– dgrat
2 days ago
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f104312%2fis-there-such-a-thing-as-a-minimal-soap-molecule%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
