Josephus Problem with cyclic iterator

Multi tool use
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Given the Josephus Problem.
Josephus Problem
N people (numbered 1 to N) are standing in a circle. Person 1 kills Person 2 with a sword and gives it to Person 3. Person 3 kills Person 4 and gives the sword to Person 5. This process is repeated until only one person is alive.
Task:
(Medium) Given the number of people N, write a program to find the number of the person that stays alive at the end.
(Hard) Show each step of the process.
(The description from Sololearn application)"
This is my code. The forEachRemaining
method solution is correct? I have to do something with this inherited method, but it has no meaning.
import java.util.Iterator;
import java.util.LinkedList;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.function.Consumer;
class CyclicIterator implements Iterator {
private final List list;
private Iterator iterator;
public CyclicIterator(List list) {
this.list = list;
initIterator(list);
}
private void initIterator(List list) {
this.iterator = list.iterator();
}
@Override
public boolean hasNext() {
return !list.isEmpty();
}
@Override
public Object next() {
if (!this.iterator.hasNext())
initIterator(list);
return this.iterator.next();
}
@Override
public void remove() {
this.iterator.remove();
}
@Override
public void forEachRemaining(Consumer action) {
throw new UnsupportedOperationException("This method has no meaning in CyclicIterator class!");
}
}
public class JosephusProblem {
public static void main(String args) {
execution(0);
execution(1);
execution(2);
execution(4);
execution(6);
}
private static void execution(int members) {
if (members < 1) {
System.out.println("The parameter (members) has to be bigger than 0!");
return;
}
if (members == 1) {
System.out.println("There is olny one person, so he is the survivor. Peaceful version! :)");
return;
}
LinkedList<Integer> list = new LinkedList();
for (int index = 0; index < members; index++)
list.add(index + 1);
Iterator<Integer> it = new CyclicIterator(list);
System.out.println("For " + members + " members: ");
while (members-- > 1) {
System.out.print(it.next() + " kills " + it.next() + ", ");
it.remove();
}
System.out.println("n The survivor: " + it.next());
}
}
java linked-list circular-list
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Given the Josephus Problem.
Josephus Problem
N people (numbered 1 to N) are standing in a circle. Person 1 kills Person 2 with a sword and gives it to Person 3. Person 3 kills Person 4 and gives the sword to Person 5. This process is repeated until only one person is alive.
Task:
(Medium) Given the number of people N, write a program to find the number of the person that stays alive at the end.
(Hard) Show each step of the process.
(The description from Sololearn application)"
This is my code. The forEachRemaining
method solution is correct? I have to do something with this inherited method, but it has no meaning.
import java.util.Iterator;
import java.util.LinkedList;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.function.Consumer;
class CyclicIterator implements Iterator {
private final List list;
private Iterator iterator;
public CyclicIterator(List list) {
this.list = list;
initIterator(list);
}
private void initIterator(List list) {
this.iterator = list.iterator();
}
@Override
public boolean hasNext() {
return !list.isEmpty();
}
@Override
public Object next() {
if (!this.iterator.hasNext())
initIterator(list);
return this.iterator.next();
}
@Override
public void remove() {
this.iterator.remove();
}
@Override
public void forEachRemaining(Consumer action) {
throw new UnsupportedOperationException("This method has no meaning in CyclicIterator class!");
}
}
public class JosephusProblem {
public static void main(String args) {
execution(0);
execution(1);
execution(2);
execution(4);
execution(6);
}
private static void execution(int members) {
if (members < 1) {
System.out.println("The parameter (members) has to be bigger than 0!");
return;
}
if (members == 1) {
System.out.println("There is olny one person, so he is the survivor. Peaceful version! :)");
return;
}
LinkedList<Integer> list = new LinkedList();
for (int index = 0; index < members; index++)
list.add(index + 1);
Iterator<Integer> it = new CyclicIterator(list);
System.out.println("For " + members + " members: ");
while (members-- > 1) {
System.out.print(it.next() + " kills " + it.next() + ", ");
it.remove();
}
System.out.println("n The survivor: " + it.next());
}
}
java linked-list circular-list
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Given the Josephus Problem.
Josephus Problem
N people (numbered 1 to N) are standing in a circle. Person 1 kills Person 2 with a sword and gives it to Person 3. Person 3 kills Person 4 and gives the sword to Person 5. This process is repeated until only one person is alive.
Task:
(Medium) Given the number of people N, write a program to find the number of the person that stays alive at the end.
(Hard) Show each step of the process.
(The description from Sololearn application)"
This is my code. The forEachRemaining
method solution is correct? I have to do something with this inherited method, but it has no meaning.
import java.util.Iterator;
import java.util.LinkedList;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.function.Consumer;
class CyclicIterator implements Iterator {
private final List list;
private Iterator iterator;
public CyclicIterator(List list) {
this.list = list;
initIterator(list);
}
private void initIterator(List list) {
this.iterator = list.iterator();
}
@Override
public boolean hasNext() {
return !list.isEmpty();
}
@Override
public Object next() {
if (!this.iterator.hasNext())
initIterator(list);
return this.iterator.next();
}
@Override
public void remove() {
this.iterator.remove();
}
@Override
public void forEachRemaining(Consumer action) {
throw new UnsupportedOperationException("This method has no meaning in CyclicIterator class!");
}
}
public class JosephusProblem {
public static void main(String args) {
execution(0);
execution(1);
execution(2);
execution(4);
execution(6);
}
private static void execution(int members) {
if (members < 1) {
System.out.println("The parameter (members) has to be bigger than 0!");
return;
}
if (members == 1) {
System.out.println("There is olny one person, so he is the survivor. Peaceful version! :)");
return;
}
LinkedList<Integer> list = new LinkedList();
for (int index = 0; index < members; index++)
list.add(index + 1);
Iterator<Integer> it = new CyclicIterator(list);
System.out.println("For " + members + " members: ");
while (members-- > 1) {
System.out.print(it.next() + " kills " + it.next() + ", ");
it.remove();
}
System.out.println("n The survivor: " + it.next());
}
}
java linked-list circular-list
Given the Josephus Problem.
Josephus Problem
N people (numbered 1 to N) are standing in a circle. Person 1 kills Person 2 with a sword and gives it to Person 3. Person 3 kills Person 4 and gives the sword to Person 5. This process is repeated until only one person is alive.
Task:
(Medium) Given the number of people N, write a program to find the number of the person that stays alive at the end.
(Hard) Show each step of the process.
(The description from Sololearn application)"
This is my code. The forEachRemaining
method solution is correct? I have to do something with this inherited method, but it has no meaning.
import java.util.Iterator;
import java.util.LinkedList;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.function.Consumer;
class CyclicIterator implements Iterator {
private final List list;
private Iterator iterator;
public CyclicIterator(List list) {
this.list = list;
initIterator(list);
}
private void initIterator(List list) {
this.iterator = list.iterator();
}
@Override
public boolean hasNext() {
return !list.isEmpty();
}
@Override
public Object next() {
if (!this.iterator.hasNext())
initIterator(list);
return this.iterator.next();
}
@Override
public void remove() {
this.iterator.remove();
}
@Override
public void forEachRemaining(Consumer action) {
throw new UnsupportedOperationException("This method has no meaning in CyclicIterator class!");
}
}
public class JosephusProblem {
public static void main(String args) {
execution(0);
execution(1);
execution(2);
execution(4);
execution(6);
}
private static void execution(int members) {
if (members < 1) {
System.out.println("The parameter (members) has to be bigger than 0!");
return;
}
if (members == 1) {
System.out.println("There is olny one person, so he is the survivor. Peaceful version! :)");
return;
}
LinkedList<Integer> list = new LinkedList();
for (int index = 0; index < members; index++)
list.add(index + 1);
Iterator<Integer> it = new CyclicIterator(list);
System.out.println("For " + members + " members: ");
while (members-- > 1) {
System.out.print(it.next() + " kills " + it.next() + ", ");
it.remove();
}
System.out.println("n The survivor: " + it.next());
}
}
java linked-list circular-list
java linked-list circular-list
asked Nov 14 at 13:27


MAttti
184
184
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
The documentation for forEachRemaining
states that the behavior is equivalent to
while (hasNext())
action.accept(next());
so why not just put that there?
New contributor
K.Nicholas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I think that would be an infinite loop. ThehasNext()
is always true if the list is not empty.
– MAttti
2 days ago
Of course the next line has a next() call in it …action.accept(next())
.
– K.Nicholas
2 days ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
The documentation for forEachRemaining
states that the behavior is equivalent to
while (hasNext())
action.accept(next());
so why not just put that there?
New contributor
K.Nicholas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I think that would be an infinite loop. ThehasNext()
is always true if the list is not empty.
– MAttti
2 days ago
Of course the next line has a next() call in it …action.accept(next())
.
– K.Nicholas
2 days ago
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
The documentation for forEachRemaining
states that the behavior is equivalent to
while (hasNext())
action.accept(next());
so why not just put that there?
New contributor
K.Nicholas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I think that would be an infinite loop. ThehasNext()
is always true if the list is not empty.
– MAttti
2 days ago
Of course the next line has a next() call in it …action.accept(next())
.
– K.Nicholas
2 days ago
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
The documentation for forEachRemaining
states that the behavior is equivalent to
while (hasNext())
action.accept(next());
so why not just put that there?
New contributor
K.Nicholas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
The documentation for forEachRemaining
states that the behavior is equivalent to
while (hasNext())
action.accept(next());
so why not just put that there?
New contributor
K.Nicholas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
K.Nicholas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered Nov 15 at 5:04
K.Nicholas
1011
1011
New contributor
K.Nicholas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
K.Nicholas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
K.Nicholas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I think that would be an infinite loop. ThehasNext()
is always true if the list is not empty.
– MAttti
2 days ago
Of course the next line has a next() call in it …action.accept(next())
.
– K.Nicholas
2 days ago
add a comment |
I think that would be an infinite loop. ThehasNext()
is always true if the list is not empty.
– MAttti
2 days ago
Of course the next line has a next() call in it …action.accept(next())
.
– K.Nicholas
2 days ago
I think that would be an infinite loop. The
hasNext()
is always true if the list is not empty.– MAttti
2 days ago
I think that would be an infinite loop. The
hasNext()
is always true if the list is not empty.– MAttti
2 days ago
Of course the next line has a next() call in it …
action.accept(next())
.– K.Nicholas
2 days ago
Of course the next line has a next() call in it …
action.accept(next())
.– K.Nicholas
2 days ago
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f207657%2fjosephus-problem-with-cyclic-iterator%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Cvy,h 8ua412I11oNd,VW19nTcO,X7d zAswUbtAfTJ0HI,aK88ZW O4EtuDxJw5M9q,vgadVNkfBYA9njdlP2JzVXvr,tBm