How do Japanese people think/talk about socioeconomic classes?
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
Every society has its own way of talking about socioeconomic class.
In America/Canada, people talk about the "poor", "(lower/upper) middle class", and "upper class", as well as the "1%" and ".1%"; basing everything off of economic levels alone.
In places like the the UK however, and pardon the fact I'm not a brit, they talk more about the "working class", which including everyone who mainly does low skilled jobs and lives off a wage alone, and contrast it with a "middle class" of people who are more specialized and less bound to an employer. A distinction that of course often results in people such as myself getting confused when reading the guardian, seeing sentences like "and it was vary unexpected that Corbyn picked up so many middle class voters". :)
Given this distinction I'm found myself quite curious: How do Japanese people talk, and in doing so, think about, socioeconomic class? What terminology do they use? What aspect do they focus on (USA = income, UK = role)?
PS. Sorry if I deeply misunderstand what "working" and "middle" class refers to, british people whom may be reading this.
culture
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
Every society has its own way of talking about socioeconomic class.
In America/Canada, people talk about the "poor", "(lower/upper) middle class", and "upper class", as well as the "1%" and ".1%"; basing everything off of economic levels alone.
In places like the the UK however, and pardon the fact I'm not a brit, they talk more about the "working class", which including everyone who mainly does low skilled jobs and lives off a wage alone, and contrast it with a "middle class" of people who are more specialized and less bound to an employer. A distinction that of course often results in people such as myself getting confused when reading the guardian, seeing sentences like "and it was vary unexpected that Corbyn picked up so many middle class voters". :)
Given this distinction I'm found myself quite curious: How do Japanese people talk, and in doing so, think about, socioeconomic class? What terminology do they use? What aspect do they focus on (USA = income, UK = role)?
PS. Sorry if I deeply misunderstand what "working" and "middle" class refers to, british people whom may be reading this.
culture
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
Every society has its own way of talking about socioeconomic class.
In America/Canada, people talk about the "poor", "(lower/upper) middle class", and "upper class", as well as the "1%" and ".1%"; basing everything off of economic levels alone.
In places like the the UK however, and pardon the fact I'm not a brit, they talk more about the "working class", which including everyone who mainly does low skilled jobs and lives off a wage alone, and contrast it with a "middle class" of people who are more specialized and less bound to an employer. A distinction that of course often results in people such as myself getting confused when reading the guardian, seeing sentences like "and it was vary unexpected that Corbyn picked up so many middle class voters". :)
Given this distinction I'm found myself quite curious: How do Japanese people talk, and in doing so, think about, socioeconomic class? What terminology do they use? What aspect do they focus on (USA = income, UK = role)?
PS. Sorry if I deeply misunderstand what "working" and "middle" class refers to, british people whom may be reading this.
culture
Every society has its own way of talking about socioeconomic class.
In America/Canada, people talk about the "poor", "(lower/upper) middle class", and "upper class", as well as the "1%" and ".1%"; basing everything off of economic levels alone.
In places like the the UK however, and pardon the fact I'm not a brit, they talk more about the "working class", which including everyone who mainly does low skilled jobs and lives off a wage alone, and contrast it with a "middle class" of people who are more specialized and less bound to an employer. A distinction that of course often results in people such as myself getting confused when reading the guardian, seeing sentences like "and it was vary unexpected that Corbyn picked up so many middle class voters". :)
Given this distinction I'm found myself quite curious: How do Japanese people talk, and in doing so, think about, socioeconomic class? What terminology do they use? What aspect do they focus on (USA = income, UK = role)?
PS. Sorry if I deeply misunderstand what "working" and "middle" class refers to, british people whom may be reading this.
culture
culture
edited Dec 1 at 3:39
asked Dec 1 at 3:28
Tirous
1,8832929
1,8832929
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
Role focused class structure is not a common concept used to describe modern Japan. Neither really income-based, at least from maybe the 50s up to the 90s (see 一億総中流). However, recently the word 格差社会 picked up, and there is a lot more talk about 貧困層 (the poor), 富裕層 (the rich) and 格差の固定化 (decreasing social mobility). I guess income-based classes are starting to become a more common concept.
That said "elites" is a very socially embedded concept. 学歴社会 (essentially class structure by academic (exam) achievement) has been a core part of Japan for long. These classes then translate to 「一流サラリーマン」(people who get jobs at prestigious (and normally large) companies) and 「三流サラリーマン」(people who get job at less prestigious (normally SMEs)). The lowest on this ladder is 「フリーター」who survives on temporary jobs. There is one class lower than this though, which would be 「ニート」(NEET). Words like 一流サラリーマン, 三流サラリーマン are more like slangs and are not part of a formal vocabulary.
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
Social (hierarchical) class, in general terms, is called 階層. The occupation-based classification (the "role class" you called) is in particular called 階級.
Thus,
- 上流階級 upper class
- 中産階級/中流階級 middle class
- 労働者階級 working class
And the income-based classes are referred to as -層 (階層 itself is not used as part of words).
- 富裕層 the rich (wealthy class)
- 中間層 middle(-income) class
- 貧困層 the poor (underclass)
中間層 and 中流階級 are often interchangeable like English "middle class", but swapping the combination of words is uncommon.
Which would Japanese people prefer to use? Income or role?
– Tirous
Dec 1 at 6:47
@Tirous I'm not very familiar with spoken English, but is there that only which series is common by country? We use both according to the meaning.
– broccoli forest
Dec 1 at 7:12
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "257"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fjapanese.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f63148%2fhow-do-japanese-people-think-talk-about-socioeconomic-classes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
Role focused class structure is not a common concept used to describe modern Japan. Neither really income-based, at least from maybe the 50s up to the 90s (see 一億総中流). However, recently the word 格差社会 picked up, and there is a lot more talk about 貧困層 (the poor), 富裕層 (the rich) and 格差の固定化 (decreasing social mobility). I guess income-based classes are starting to become a more common concept.
That said "elites" is a very socially embedded concept. 学歴社会 (essentially class structure by academic (exam) achievement) has been a core part of Japan for long. These classes then translate to 「一流サラリーマン」(people who get jobs at prestigious (and normally large) companies) and 「三流サラリーマン」(people who get job at less prestigious (normally SMEs)). The lowest on this ladder is 「フリーター」who survives on temporary jobs. There is one class lower than this though, which would be 「ニート」(NEET). Words like 一流サラリーマン, 三流サラリーマン are more like slangs and are not part of a formal vocabulary.
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
Role focused class structure is not a common concept used to describe modern Japan. Neither really income-based, at least from maybe the 50s up to the 90s (see 一億総中流). However, recently the word 格差社会 picked up, and there is a lot more talk about 貧困層 (the poor), 富裕層 (the rich) and 格差の固定化 (decreasing social mobility). I guess income-based classes are starting to become a more common concept.
That said "elites" is a very socially embedded concept. 学歴社会 (essentially class structure by academic (exam) achievement) has been a core part of Japan for long. These classes then translate to 「一流サラリーマン」(people who get jobs at prestigious (and normally large) companies) and 「三流サラリーマン」(people who get job at less prestigious (normally SMEs)). The lowest on this ladder is 「フリーター」who survives on temporary jobs. There is one class lower than this though, which would be 「ニート」(NEET). Words like 一流サラリーマン, 三流サラリーマン are more like slangs and are not part of a formal vocabulary.
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
Role focused class structure is not a common concept used to describe modern Japan. Neither really income-based, at least from maybe the 50s up to the 90s (see 一億総中流). However, recently the word 格差社会 picked up, and there is a lot more talk about 貧困層 (the poor), 富裕層 (the rich) and 格差の固定化 (decreasing social mobility). I guess income-based classes are starting to become a more common concept.
That said "elites" is a very socially embedded concept. 学歴社会 (essentially class structure by academic (exam) achievement) has been a core part of Japan for long. These classes then translate to 「一流サラリーマン」(people who get jobs at prestigious (and normally large) companies) and 「三流サラリーマン」(people who get job at less prestigious (normally SMEs)). The lowest on this ladder is 「フリーター」who survives on temporary jobs. There is one class lower than this though, which would be 「ニート」(NEET). Words like 一流サラリーマン, 三流サラリーマン are more like slangs and are not part of a formal vocabulary.
Role focused class structure is not a common concept used to describe modern Japan. Neither really income-based, at least from maybe the 50s up to the 90s (see 一億総中流). However, recently the word 格差社会 picked up, and there is a lot more talk about 貧困層 (the poor), 富裕層 (the rich) and 格差の固定化 (decreasing social mobility). I guess income-based classes are starting to become a more common concept.
That said "elites" is a very socially embedded concept. 学歴社会 (essentially class structure by academic (exam) achievement) has been a core part of Japan for long. These classes then translate to 「一流サラリーマン」(people who get jobs at prestigious (and normally large) companies) and 「三流サラリーマン」(people who get job at less prestigious (normally SMEs)). The lowest on this ladder is 「フリーター」who survives on temporary jobs. There is one class lower than this though, which would be 「ニート」(NEET). Words like 一流サラリーマン, 三流サラリーマン are more like slangs and are not part of a formal vocabulary.
answered Dec 1 at 7:49
Enno Shioji
11k2343
11k2343
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
Social (hierarchical) class, in general terms, is called 階層. The occupation-based classification (the "role class" you called) is in particular called 階級.
Thus,
- 上流階級 upper class
- 中産階級/中流階級 middle class
- 労働者階級 working class
And the income-based classes are referred to as -層 (階層 itself is not used as part of words).
- 富裕層 the rich (wealthy class)
- 中間層 middle(-income) class
- 貧困層 the poor (underclass)
中間層 and 中流階級 are often interchangeable like English "middle class", but swapping the combination of words is uncommon.
Which would Japanese people prefer to use? Income or role?
– Tirous
Dec 1 at 6:47
@Tirous I'm not very familiar with spoken English, but is there that only which series is common by country? We use both according to the meaning.
– broccoli forest
Dec 1 at 7:12
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
Social (hierarchical) class, in general terms, is called 階層. The occupation-based classification (the "role class" you called) is in particular called 階級.
Thus,
- 上流階級 upper class
- 中産階級/中流階級 middle class
- 労働者階級 working class
And the income-based classes are referred to as -層 (階層 itself is not used as part of words).
- 富裕層 the rich (wealthy class)
- 中間層 middle(-income) class
- 貧困層 the poor (underclass)
中間層 and 中流階級 are often interchangeable like English "middle class", but swapping the combination of words is uncommon.
Which would Japanese people prefer to use? Income or role?
– Tirous
Dec 1 at 6:47
@Tirous I'm not very familiar with spoken English, but is there that only which series is common by country? We use both according to the meaning.
– broccoli forest
Dec 1 at 7:12
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
Social (hierarchical) class, in general terms, is called 階層. The occupation-based classification (the "role class" you called) is in particular called 階級.
Thus,
- 上流階級 upper class
- 中産階級/中流階級 middle class
- 労働者階級 working class
And the income-based classes are referred to as -層 (階層 itself is not used as part of words).
- 富裕層 the rich (wealthy class)
- 中間層 middle(-income) class
- 貧困層 the poor (underclass)
中間層 and 中流階級 are often interchangeable like English "middle class", but swapping the combination of words is uncommon.
Social (hierarchical) class, in general terms, is called 階層. The occupation-based classification (the "role class" you called) is in particular called 階級.
Thus,
- 上流階級 upper class
- 中産階級/中流階級 middle class
- 労働者階級 working class
And the income-based classes are referred to as -層 (階層 itself is not used as part of words).
- 富裕層 the rich (wealthy class)
- 中間層 middle(-income) class
- 貧困層 the poor (underclass)
中間層 and 中流階級 are often interchangeable like English "middle class", but swapping the combination of words is uncommon.
answered Dec 1 at 5:37
broccoli forest
29.4k13795
29.4k13795
Which would Japanese people prefer to use? Income or role?
– Tirous
Dec 1 at 6:47
@Tirous I'm not very familiar with spoken English, but is there that only which series is common by country? We use both according to the meaning.
– broccoli forest
Dec 1 at 7:12
add a comment |
Which would Japanese people prefer to use? Income or role?
– Tirous
Dec 1 at 6:47
@Tirous I'm not very familiar with spoken English, but is there that only which series is common by country? We use both according to the meaning.
– broccoli forest
Dec 1 at 7:12
Which would Japanese people prefer to use? Income or role?
– Tirous
Dec 1 at 6:47
Which would Japanese people prefer to use? Income or role?
– Tirous
Dec 1 at 6:47
@Tirous I'm not very familiar with spoken English, but is there that only which series is common by country? We use both according to the meaning.
– broccoli forest
Dec 1 at 7:12
@Tirous I'm not very familiar with spoken English, but is there that only which series is common by country? We use both according to the meaning.
– broccoli forest
Dec 1 at 7:12
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Japanese Language Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fjapanese.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f63148%2fhow-do-japanese-people-think-talk-about-socioeconomic-classes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown