Topology on $X$ that is $T_0$ but not $T_1$












0














Show that if $text{card}(X) geq 2$, there is a topology on $X$ that is $T_0$ but not $T_1$



Consider the point set ${a,b}$ where $b>a$. Then, the topological space of this set is $T_0$ as there is an open neighborhood of one that does not contain the other. But this is not $T_1$ as $b$ won't be closed. By induction, the following holds for $text{card}(X) geq 2$. Is this okay?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • Is the mathematical induction really required?
    – Aniruddha Deshmukh
    Nov 25 at 13:28










  • First of all, why can we speak of $b>a$? Secondly, what do you mean by "the topological space"?
    – Jonas Lenz
    Nov 25 at 13:31










  • You have to define a topology on $X$ with the properties that are asked for. On any set we can define the discrete, the indiscrete (trivial) topology, included and excluded point topologies etc. On infinite $X$ the cofinite topology and on uncountable ones the co-countable ones. Linear orders on a set induce at least three topologies (upper, lower and their combination, the "linear topology") etc.
    – Henno Brandsma
    Nov 25 at 14:11


















0














Show that if $text{card}(X) geq 2$, there is a topology on $X$ that is $T_0$ but not $T_1$



Consider the point set ${a,b}$ where $b>a$. Then, the topological space of this set is $T_0$ as there is an open neighborhood of one that does not contain the other. But this is not $T_1$ as $b$ won't be closed. By induction, the following holds for $text{card}(X) geq 2$. Is this okay?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • Is the mathematical induction really required?
    – Aniruddha Deshmukh
    Nov 25 at 13:28










  • First of all, why can we speak of $b>a$? Secondly, what do you mean by "the topological space"?
    – Jonas Lenz
    Nov 25 at 13:31










  • You have to define a topology on $X$ with the properties that are asked for. On any set we can define the discrete, the indiscrete (trivial) topology, included and excluded point topologies etc. On infinite $X$ the cofinite topology and on uncountable ones the co-countable ones. Linear orders on a set induce at least three topologies (upper, lower and their combination, the "linear topology") etc.
    – Henno Brandsma
    Nov 25 at 14:11
















0












0








0


1





Show that if $text{card}(X) geq 2$, there is a topology on $X$ that is $T_0$ but not $T_1$



Consider the point set ${a,b}$ where $b>a$. Then, the topological space of this set is $T_0$ as there is an open neighborhood of one that does not contain the other. But this is not $T_1$ as $b$ won't be closed. By induction, the following holds for $text{card}(X) geq 2$. Is this okay?










share|cite|improve this question













Show that if $text{card}(X) geq 2$, there is a topology on $X$ that is $T_0$ but not $T_1$



Consider the point set ${a,b}$ where $b>a$. Then, the topological space of this set is $T_0$ as there is an open neighborhood of one that does not contain the other. But this is not $T_1$ as $b$ won't be closed. By induction, the following holds for $text{card}(X) geq 2$. Is this okay?







general-topology






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 25 at 13:23









Dom

1627




1627












  • Is the mathematical induction really required?
    – Aniruddha Deshmukh
    Nov 25 at 13:28










  • First of all, why can we speak of $b>a$? Secondly, what do you mean by "the topological space"?
    – Jonas Lenz
    Nov 25 at 13:31










  • You have to define a topology on $X$ with the properties that are asked for. On any set we can define the discrete, the indiscrete (trivial) topology, included and excluded point topologies etc. On infinite $X$ the cofinite topology and on uncountable ones the co-countable ones. Linear orders on a set induce at least three topologies (upper, lower and their combination, the "linear topology") etc.
    – Henno Brandsma
    Nov 25 at 14:11




















  • Is the mathematical induction really required?
    – Aniruddha Deshmukh
    Nov 25 at 13:28










  • First of all, why can we speak of $b>a$? Secondly, what do you mean by "the topological space"?
    – Jonas Lenz
    Nov 25 at 13:31










  • You have to define a topology on $X$ with the properties that are asked for. On any set we can define the discrete, the indiscrete (trivial) topology, included and excluded point topologies etc. On infinite $X$ the cofinite topology and on uncountable ones the co-countable ones. Linear orders on a set induce at least three topologies (upper, lower and their combination, the "linear topology") etc.
    – Henno Brandsma
    Nov 25 at 14:11


















Is the mathematical induction really required?
– Aniruddha Deshmukh
Nov 25 at 13:28




Is the mathematical induction really required?
– Aniruddha Deshmukh
Nov 25 at 13:28












First of all, why can we speak of $b>a$? Secondly, what do you mean by "the topological space"?
– Jonas Lenz
Nov 25 at 13:31




First of all, why can we speak of $b>a$? Secondly, what do you mean by "the topological space"?
– Jonas Lenz
Nov 25 at 13:31












You have to define a topology on $X$ with the properties that are asked for. On any set we can define the discrete, the indiscrete (trivial) topology, included and excluded point topologies etc. On infinite $X$ the cofinite topology and on uncountable ones the co-countable ones. Linear orders on a set induce at least three topologies (upper, lower and their combination, the "linear topology") etc.
– Henno Brandsma
Nov 25 at 14:11






You have to define a topology on $X$ with the properties that are asked for. On any set we can define the discrete, the indiscrete (trivial) topology, included and excluded point topologies etc. On infinite $X$ the cofinite topology and on uncountable ones the co-countable ones. Linear orders on a set induce at least three topologies (upper, lower and their combination, the "linear topology") etc.
– Henno Brandsma
Nov 25 at 14:11












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














No induction needed. Let $p$ and $q$ be distinct points of $X$.



Define $mathcal{T} = {A subseteq X: p in A} cup {emptyset}$, which is a topology (the included point topology).



Then $(X,mathcal{T})$ is $T_0$ (if $x neq y$ then one of them is not $p$ (say $x$) and then $Xsetminus{x}$ is open and contains $y$ and not $x$), but not $T_1$ as ${p}$ is not closed, as $Xsetminus {p}$ is not open (it's non-empty because of $q$ and does not contain $p$, so it's not in $mathcal{T}$).



As an alternative, put a linear order on $X$ (uses axiom of choice) and we have two points $p < q$ WLOG.



Define the topology (upper topology) by $mathcal{T}_u={emptyset,X} cup{(x,infty): x in X}$, where $(x,infty) = {p in X: x < p}$.
This is $T_0$ because if $x neq y$, then $x < y$ (WLOG) and then $y in (x,infty)$ and $x$ is not in that set. It is not $T_1$, e.g. because $p$ will always be in the closure of ${q}$ when $p < q$ (as chosen above).






share|cite|improve this answer























    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3012824%2ftopology-on-x-that-is-t-0-but-not-t-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0














    No induction needed. Let $p$ and $q$ be distinct points of $X$.



    Define $mathcal{T} = {A subseteq X: p in A} cup {emptyset}$, which is a topology (the included point topology).



    Then $(X,mathcal{T})$ is $T_0$ (if $x neq y$ then one of them is not $p$ (say $x$) and then $Xsetminus{x}$ is open and contains $y$ and not $x$), but not $T_1$ as ${p}$ is not closed, as $Xsetminus {p}$ is not open (it's non-empty because of $q$ and does not contain $p$, so it's not in $mathcal{T}$).



    As an alternative, put a linear order on $X$ (uses axiom of choice) and we have two points $p < q$ WLOG.



    Define the topology (upper topology) by $mathcal{T}_u={emptyset,X} cup{(x,infty): x in X}$, where $(x,infty) = {p in X: x < p}$.
    This is $T_0$ because if $x neq y$, then $x < y$ (WLOG) and then $y in (x,infty)$ and $x$ is not in that set. It is not $T_1$, e.g. because $p$ will always be in the closure of ${q}$ when $p < q$ (as chosen above).






    share|cite|improve this answer




























      0














      No induction needed. Let $p$ and $q$ be distinct points of $X$.



      Define $mathcal{T} = {A subseteq X: p in A} cup {emptyset}$, which is a topology (the included point topology).



      Then $(X,mathcal{T})$ is $T_0$ (if $x neq y$ then one of them is not $p$ (say $x$) and then $Xsetminus{x}$ is open and contains $y$ and not $x$), but not $T_1$ as ${p}$ is not closed, as $Xsetminus {p}$ is not open (it's non-empty because of $q$ and does not contain $p$, so it's not in $mathcal{T}$).



      As an alternative, put a linear order on $X$ (uses axiom of choice) and we have two points $p < q$ WLOG.



      Define the topology (upper topology) by $mathcal{T}_u={emptyset,X} cup{(x,infty): x in X}$, where $(x,infty) = {p in X: x < p}$.
      This is $T_0$ because if $x neq y$, then $x < y$ (WLOG) and then $y in (x,infty)$ and $x$ is not in that set. It is not $T_1$, e.g. because $p$ will always be in the closure of ${q}$ when $p < q$ (as chosen above).






      share|cite|improve this answer


























        0












        0








        0






        No induction needed. Let $p$ and $q$ be distinct points of $X$.



        Define $mathcal{T} = {A subseteq X: p in A} cup {emptyset}$, which is a topology (the included point topology).



        Then $(X,mathcal{T})$ is $T_0$ (if $x neq y$ then one of them is not $p$ (say $x$) and then $Xsetminus{x}$ is open and contains $y$ and not $x$), but not $T_1$ as ${p}$ is not closed, as $Xsetminus {p}$ is not open (it's non-empty because of $q$ and does not contain $p$, so it's not in $mathcal{T}$).



        As an alternative, put a linear order on $X$ (uses axiom of choice) and we have two points $p < q$ WLOG.



        Define the topology (upper topology) by $mathcal{T}_u={emptyset,X} cup{(x,infty): x in X}$, where $(x,infty) = {p in X: x < p}$.
        This is $T_0$ because if $x neq y$, then $x < y$ (WLOG) and then $y in (x,infty)$ and $x$ is not in that set. It is not $T_1$, e.g. because $p$ will always be in the closure of ${q}$ when $p < q$ (as chosen above).






        share|cite|improve this answer














        No induction needed. Let $p$ and $q$ be distinct points of $X$.



        Define $mathcal{T} = {A subseteq X: p in A} cup {emptyset}$, which is a topology (the included point topology).



        Then $(X,mathcal{T})$ is $T_0$ (if $x neq y$ then one of them is not $p$ (say $x$) and then $Xsetminus{x}$ is open and contains $y$ and not $x$), but not $T_1$ as ${p}$ is not closed, as $Xsetminus {p}$ is not open (it's non-empty because of $q$ and does not contain $p$, so it's not in $mathcal{T}$).



        As an alternative, put a linear order on $X$ (uses axiom of choice) and we have two points $p < q$ WLOG.



        Define the topology (upper topology) by $mathcal{T}_u={emptyset,X} cup{(x,infty): x in X}$, where $(x,infty) = {p in X: x < p}$.
        This is $T_0$ because if $x neq y$, then $x < y$ (WLOG) and then $y in (x,infty)$ and $x$ is not in that set. It is not $T_1$, e.g. because $p$ will always be in the closure of ${q}$ when $p < q$ (as chosen above).







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Nov 25 at 14:04

























        answered Nov 25 at 13:36









        Henno Brandsma

        104k346113




        104k346113






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3012824%2ftopology-on-x-that-is-t-0-but-not-t-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Mont Emei

            Province de Neuquén

            Journaliste