DE Undetermined Coefficient Method












0












$begingroup$


I would like to solve the following non-homogeneous second order differential equation with constant coefficients with the method of undetermined coefficient but I have some problem with the particular solution, can someone help me? Thanks in advance!

$2y^{''}+3y^{'}+y=t^{-2}$


My problem is that I don't know how to treat the negative power. For example considering $t^{2}$, I can write $Y=At^2+Bt+C$. But in this case what I should do?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    @Moo. Did you try it ? I am almost sure that there is a typo since the particular solution involve very special functions.
    $endgroup$
    – Claude Leibovici
    Dec 2 '18 at 5:19










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the comments, so with undetermined coefficient is not possible to solve?
    $endgroup$
    – Fabio Taccaliti
    Dec 2 '18 at 5:41










  • $begingroup$
    What makes you think this is possible? Undetermined coefficients, at least the version in most books, applies only to functions $g(t)$ of very special form.
    $endgroup$
    – David C. Ullrich
    Dec 2 '18 at 14:32


















0












$begingroup$


I would like to solve the following non-homogeneous second order differential equation with constant coefficients with the method of undetermined coefficient but I have some problem with the particular solution, can someone help me? Thanks in advance!

$2y^{''}+3y^{'}+y=t^{-2}$


My problem is that I don't know how to treat the negative power. For example considering $t^{2}$, I can write $Y=At^2+Bt+C$. But in this case what I should do?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    @Moo. Did you try it ? I am almost sure that there is a typo since the particular solution involve very special functions.
    $endgroup$
    – Claude Leibovici
    Dec 2 '18 at 5:19










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the comments, so with undetermined coefficient is not possible to solve?
    $endgroup$
    – Fabio Taccaliti
    Dec 2 '18 at 5:41










  • $begingroup$
    What makes you think this is possible? Undetermined coefficients, at least the version in most books, applies only to functions $g(t)$ of very special form.
    $endgroup$
    – David C. Ullrich
    Dec 2 '18 at 14:32
















0












0








0





$begingroup$


I would like to solve the following non-homogeneous second order differential equation with constant coefficients with the method of undetermined coefficient but I have some problem with the particular solution, can someone help me? Thanks in advance!

$2y^{''}+3y^{'}+y=t^{-2}$


My problem is that I don't know how to treat the negative power. For example considering $t^{2}$, I can write $Y=At^2+Bt+C$. But in this case what I should do?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I would like to solve the following non-homogeneous second order differential equation with constant coefficients with the method of undetermined coefficient but I have some problem with the particular solution, can someone help me? Thanks in advance!

$2y^{''}+3y^{'}+y=t^{-2}$


My problem is that I don't know how to treat the negative power. For example considering $t^{2}$, I can write $Y=At^2+Bt+C$. But in this case what I should do?







ordinary-differential-equations






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 2 '18 at 4:47









Fabio TaccalitiFabio Taccaliti

847




847












  • $begingroup$
    @Moo. Did you try it ? I am almost sure that there is a typo since the particular solution involve very special functions.
    $endgroup$
    – Claude Leibovici
    Dec 2 '18 at 5:19










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the comments, so with undetermined coefficient is not possible to solve?
    $endgroup$
    – Fabio Taccaliti
    Dec 2 '18 at 5:41










  • $begingroup$
    What makes you think this is possible? Undetermined coefficients, at least the version in most books, applies only to functions $g(t)$ of very special form.
    $endgroup$
    – David C. Ullrich
    Dec 2 '18 at 14:32




















  • $begingroup$
    @Moo. Did you try it ? I am almost sure that there is a typo since the particular solution involve very special functions.
    $endgroup$
    – Claude Leibovici
    Dec 2 '18 at 5:19










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the comments, so with undetermined coefficient is not possible to solve?
    $endgroup$
    – Fabio Taccaliti
    Dec 2 '18 at 5:41










  • $begingroup$
    What makes you think this is possible? Undetermined coefficients, at least the version in most books, applies only to functions $g(t)$ of very special form.
    $endgroup$
    – David C. Ullrich
    Dec 2 '18 at 14:32


















$begingroup$
@Moo. Did you try it ? I am almost sure that there is a typo since the particular solution involve very special functions.
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Dec 2 '18 at 5:19




$begingroup$
@Moo. Did you try it ? I am almost sure that there is a typo since the particular solution involve very special functions.
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Dec 2 '18 at 5:19












$begingroup$
Thanks for the comments, so with undetermined coefficient is not possible to solve?
$endgroup$
– Fabio Taccaliti
Dec 2 '18 at 5:41




$begingroup$
Thanks for the comments, so with undetermined coefficient is not possible to solve?
$endgroup$
– Fabio Taccaliti
Dec 2 '18 at 5:41












$begingroup$
What makes you think this is possible? Undetermined coefficients, at least the version in most books, applies only to functions $g(t)$ of very special form.
$endgroup$
– David C. Ullrich
Dec 2 '18 at 14:32






$begingroup$
What makes you think this is possible? Undetermined coefficients, at least the version in most books, applies only to functions $g(t)$ of very special form.
$endgroup$
– David C. Ullrich
Dec 2 '18 at 14:32












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

First, the characteristic polynomial



$$ 2r^2 + 3r + 1 = (2r+1)(r+1) = 0 implies r = -1, -1/2 $$



So the fundamental solution is
$$ y_h(t) = c_1 e^{-t} + c_2e^{-t/2} $$





Now, you probably won't be able to use undetermined coefficients to obtain the particular solution, but variation of parameters can be of use. Let



$$ y_p(t) = u(t)e^{-t} + v(t)e^{-t/2} $$



Then



begin{align}
e^{-t}u' + e^{-t/2}v' &= 0 \
-e^{-t}u' - frac12 e^{-t/2}v' &= frac12 t^{-2}
end{align}



$$ implies u' = -t^{-2}e^t , quad v' = t^{-2}e^{t/2} $$



The integrals are non-elementary, but can be expressed in terms of incomplete Gamma functions






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks a lot, now it's clear!
    $endgroup$
    – Fabio Taccaliti
    Dec 2 '18 at 19:17











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3022247%2fde-undetermined-coefficient-method%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2












$begingroup$

First, the characteristic polynomial



$$ 2r^2 + 3r + 1 = (2r+1)(r+1) = 0 implies r = -1, -1/2 $$



So the fundamental solution is
$$ y_h(t) = c_1 e^{-t} + c_2e^{-t/2} $$





Now, you probably won't be able to use undetermined coefficients to obtain the particular solution, but variation of parameters can be of use. Let



$$ y_p(t) = u(t)e^{-t} + v(t)e^{-t/2} $$



Then



begin{align}
e^{-t}u' + e^{-t/2}v' &= 0 \
-e^{-t}u' - frac12 e^{-t/2}v' &= frac12 t^{-2}
end{align}



$$ implies u' = -t^{-2}e^t , quad v' = t^{-2}e^{t/2} $$



The integrals are non-elementary, but can be expressed in terms of incomplete Gamma functions






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks a lot, now it's clear!
    $endgroup$
    – Fabio Taccaliti
    Dec 2 '18 at 19:17
















2












$begingroup$

First, the characteristic polynomial



$$ 2r^2 + 3r + 1 = (2r+1)(r+1) = 0 implies r = -1, -1/2 $$



So the fundamental solution is
$$ y_h(t) = c_1 e^{-t} + c_2e^{-t/2} $$





Now, you probably won't be able to use undetermined coefficients to obtain the particular solution, but variation of parameters can be of use. Let



$$ y_p(t) = u(t)e^{-t} + v(t)e^{-t/2} $$



Then



begin{align}
e^{-t}u' + e^{-t/2}v' &= 0 \
-e^{-t}u' - frac12 e^{-t/2}v' &= frac12 t^{-2}
end{align}



$$ implies u' = -t^{-2}e^t , quad v' = t^{-2}e^{t/2} $$



The integrals are non-elementary, but can be expressed in terms of incomplete Gamma functions






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks a lot, now it's clear!
    $endgroup$
    – Fabio Taccaliti
    Dec 2 '18 at 19:17














2












2








2





$begingroup$

First, the characteristic polynomial



$$ 2r^2 + 3r + 1 = (2r+1)(r+1) = 0 implies r = -1, -1/2 $$



So the fundamental solution is
$$ y_h(t) = c_1 e^{-t} + c_2e^{-t/2} $$





Now, you probably won't be able to use undetermined coefficients to obtain the particular solution, but variation of parameters can be of use. Let



$$ y_p(t) = u(t)e^{-t} + v(t)e^{-t/2} $$



Then



begin{align}
e^{-t}u' + e^{-t/2}v' &= 0 \
-e^{-t}u' - frac12 e^{-t/2}v' &= frac12 t^{-2}
end{align}



$$ implies u' = -t^{-2}e^t , quad v' = t^{-2}e^{t/2} $$



The integrals are non-elementary, but can be expressed in terms of incomplete Gamma functions






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



First, the characteristic polynomial



$$ 2r^2 + 3r + 1 = (2r+1)(r+1) = 0 implies r = -1, -1/2 $$



So the fundamental solution is
$$ y_h(t) = c_1 e^{-t} + c_2e^{-t/2} $$





Now, you probably won't be able to use undetermined coefficients to obtain the particular solution, but variation of parameters can be of use. Let



$$ y_p(t) = u(t)e^{-t} + v(t)e^{-t/2} $$



Then



begin{align}
e^{-t}u' + e^{-t/2}v' &= 0 \
-e^{-t}u' - frac12 e^{-t/2}v' &= frac12 t^{-2}
end{align}



$$ implies u' = -t^{-2}e^t , quad v' = t^{-2}e^{t/2} $$



The integrals are non-elementary, but can be expressed in terms of incomplete Gamma functions







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Dec 3 '18 at 6:27

























answered Dec 2 '18 at 15:51









DylanDylan

12.4k31026




12.4k31026












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks a lot, now it's clear!
    $endgroup$
    – Fabio Taccaliti
    Dec 2 '18 at 19:17


















  • $begingroup$
    Thanks a lot, now it's clear!
    $endgroup$
    – Fabio Taccaliti
    Dec 2 '18 at 19:17
















$begingroup$
Thanks a lot, now it's clear!
$endgroup$
– Fabio Taccaliti
Dec 2 '18 at 19:17




$begingroup$
Thanks a lot, now it's clear!
$endgroup$
– Fabio Taccaliti
Dec 2 '18 at 19:17


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3022247%2fde-undetermined-coefficient-method%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Quarter-circle Tiles

build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

Mont Emei