If $tilde{lambda}$ is an eigenvalue of $A$ of multiplicity $n$, then $A$ is a scalar matrix, where $A$ is $n...
$begingroup$
If $tilde{lambda}$ is an eigenvalue of $A$ of multiplicity $n$, then $A$ is a scalar matrix, where $A$ is $n times n$ real symmetric matrix.
So I know that $A = begin{bmatrix}a&b\b&cend{bmatrix} $
and that $$det(A-lambda I_2) = (a-λ)(c-λ) - b^2$$
However I don't really know how to proceed from there.
linear-algebra
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $tilde{lambda}$ is an eigenvalue of $A$ of multiplicity $n$, then $A$ is a scalar matrix, where $A$ is $n times n$ real symmetric matrix.
So I know that $A = begin{bmatrix}a&b\b&cend{bmatrix} $
and that $$det(A-lambda I_2) = (a-λ)(c-λ) - b^2$$
However I don't really know how to proceed from there.
linear-algebra
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
1. Dont assume A is 2$times$2. Also you know that det(A-$lambda$I) = $(x-lambda)^n$.
$endgroup$
– Joel Pereira
Dec 2 '18 at 1:49
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $tilde{lambda}$ is an eigenvalue of $A$ of multiplicity $n$, then $A$ is a scalar matrix, where $A$ is $n times n$ real symmetric matrix.
So I know that $A = begin{bmatrix}a&b\b&cend{bmatrix} $
and that $$det(A-lambda I_2) = (a-λ)(c-λ) - b^2$$
However I don't really know how to proceed from there.
linear-algebra
$endgroup$
If $tilde{lambda}$ is an eigenvalue of $A$ of multiplicity $n$, then $A$ is a scalar matrix, where $A$ is $n times n$ real symmetric matrix.
So I know that $A = begin{bmatrix}a&b\b&cend{bmatrix} $
and that $$det(A-lambda I_2) = (a-λ)(c-λ) - b^2$$
However I don't really know how to proceed from there.
linear-algebra
linear-algebra
edited Dec 2 '18 at 5:00
Brahadeesh
6,19742361
6,19742361
asked Dec 2 '18 at 1:43
Zhe TianZhe Tian
132
132
$begingroup$
1. Dont assume A is 2$times$2. Also you know that det(A-$lambda$I) = $(x-lambda)^n$.
$endgroup$
– Joel Pereira
Dec 2 '18 at 1:49
add a comment |
$begingroup$
1. Dont assume A is 2$times$2. Also you know that det(A-$lambda$I) = $(x-lambda)^n$.
$endgroup$
– Joel Pereira
Dec 2 '18 at 1:49
$begingroup$
1. Dont assume A is 2$times$2. Also you know that det(A-$lambda$I) = $(x-lambda)^n$.
$endgroup$
– Joel Pereira
Dec 2 '18 at 1:49
$begingroup$
1. Dont assume A is 2$times$2. Also you know that det(A-$lambda$I) = $(x-lambda)^n$.
$endgroup$
– Joel Pereira
Dec 2 '18 at 1:49
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Hint:
If $A$ has an eigenvalue of multiplicity $n$, it is the only eigenvalue of $A$, so. Furthermore real symmetric matrices are diagonalisable, so its diagonal form is $lambda I$. Can you deduce that $A$ is $lambda I$?.
More details:
Since is real symmetric, there exists an orthogonal matrix $P$ and a diagonal matrix $D$ such that
$$A=PDP^{-1}=P(lambda I)P^{-1}=lambda(PIP^{-1})=lambda I.$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Sorry I'm still confused on what you mean?
$endgroup$
– Zhe Tian
Dec 2 '18 at 2:14
$begingroup$
@ZheTian: I've added details. Is that clearer?
$endgroup$
– Bernard
Dec 2 '18 at 12:20
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your definition of scalar matrix is a diagonal matrix which every element in the diagonal are the same, right?
I assumed that the question should be "... then $A$ is a matrix similar to a scalar matrix". But you also can abuse notation and say that, in fact, $A$ "is'' a scalar matrix by the fact that similiar matrices can represent the same linear transformation...
But, if $A$ is a $ntimes n$ symmetric matrix, then $A$ is diagonalizable and there is a invertible $P$ such that $A=P DP^{-1}$, where $D=diag(lambda,cdots,lambda)$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3022111%2fif-tilde-lambda-is-an-eigenvalue-of-a-of-multiplicity-n-then-a-is-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Hint:
If $A$ has an eigenvalue of multiplicity $n$, it is the only eigenvalue of $A$, so. Furthermore real symmetric matrices are diagonalisable, so its diagonal form is $lambda I$. Can you deduce that $A$ is $lambda I$?.
More details:
Since is real symmetric, there exists an orthogonal matrix $P$ and a diagonal matrix $D$ such that
$$A=PDP^{-1}=P(lambda I)P^{-1}=lambda(PIP^{-1})=lambda I.$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Sorry I'm still confused on what you mean?
$endgroup$
– Zhe Tian
Dec 2 '18 at 2:14
$begingroup$
@ZheTian: I've added details. Is that clearer?
$endgroup$
– Bernard
Dec 2 '18 at 12:20
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint:
If $A$ has an eigenvalue of multiplicity $n$, it is the only eigenvalue of $A$, so. Furthermore real symmetric matrices are diagonalisable, so its diagonal form is $lambda I$. Can you deduce that $A$ is $lambda I$?.
More details:
Since is real symmetric, there exists an orthogonal matrix $P$ and a diagonal matrix $D$ such that
$$A=PDP^{-1}=P(lambda I)P^{-1}=lambda(PIP^{-1})=lambda I.$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Sorry I'm still confused on what you mean?
$endgroup$
– Zhe Tian
Dec 2 '18 at 2:14
$begingroup$
@ZheTian: I've added details. Is that clearer?
$endgroup$
– Bernard
Dec 2 '18 at 12:20
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint:
If $A$ has an eigenvalue of multiplicity $n$, it is the only eigenvalue of $A$, so. Furthermore real symmetric matrices are diagonalisable, so its diagonal form is $lambda I$. Can you deduce that $A$ is $lambda I$?.
More details:
Since is real symmetric, there exists an orthogonal matrix $P$ and a diagonal matrix $D$ such that
$$A=PDP^{-1}=P(lambda I)P^{-1}=lambda(PIP^{-1})=lambda I.$$
$endgroup$
Hint:
If $A$ has an eigenvalue of multiplicity $n$, it is the only eigenvalue of $A$, so. Furthermore real symmetric matrices are diagonalisable, so its diagonal form is $lambda I$. Can you deduce that $A$ is $lambda I$?.
More details:
Since is real symmetric, there exists an orthogonal matrix $P$ and a diagonal matrix $D$ such that
$$A=PDP^{-1}=P(lambda I)P^{-1}=lambda(PIP^{-1})=lambda I.$$
edited Dec 2 '18 at 12:20
answered Dec 2 '18 at 2:00
BernardBernard
119k639112
119k639112
$begingroup$
Sorry I'm still confused on what you mean?
$endgroup$
– Zhe Tian
Dec 2 '18 at 2:14
$begingroup$
@ZheTian: I've added details. Is that clearer?
$endgroup$
– Bernard
Dec 2 '18 at 12:20
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Sorry I'm still confused on what you mean?
$endgroup$
– Zhe Tian
Dec 2 '18 at 2:14
$begingroup$
@ZheTian: I've added details. Is that clearer?
$endgroup$
– Bernard
Dec 2 '18 at 12:20
$begingroup$
Sorry I'm still confused on what you mean?
$endgroup$
– Zhe Tian
Dec 2 '18 at 2:14
$begingroup$
Sorry I'm still confused on what you mean?
$endgroup$
– Zhe Tian
Dec 2 '18 at 2:14
$begingroup$
@ZheTian: I've added details. Is that clearer?
$endgroup$
– Bernard
Dec 2 '18 at 12:20
$begingroup$
@ZheTian: I've added details. Is that clearer?
$endgroup$
– Bernard
Dec 2 '18 at 12:20
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your definition of scalar matrix is a diagonal matrix which every element in the diagonal are the same, right?
I assumed that the question should be "... then $A$ is a matrix similar to a scalar matrix". But you also can abuse notation and say that, in fact, $A$ "is'' a scalar matrix by the fact that similiar matrices can represent the same linear transformation...
But, if $A$ is a $ntimes n$ symmetric matrix, then $A$ is diagonalizable and there is a invertible $P$ such that $A=P DP^{-1}$, where $D=diag(lambda,cdots,lambda)$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your definition of scalar matrix is a diagonal matrix which every element in the diagonal are the same, right?
I assumed that the question should be "... then $A$ is a matrix similar to a scalar matrix". But you also can abuse notation and say that, in fact, $A$ "is'' a scalar matrix by the fact that similiar matrices can represent the same linear transformation...
But, if $A$ is a $ntimes n$ symmetric matrix, then $A$ is diagonalizable and there is a invertible $P$ such that $A=P DP^{-1}$, where $D=diag(lambda,cdots,lambda)$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your definition of scalar matrix is a diagonal matrix which every element in the diagonal are the same, right?
I assumed that the question should be "... then $A$ is a matrix similar to a scalar matrix". But you also can abuse notation and say that, in fact, $A$ "is'' a scalar matrix by the fact that similiar matrices can represent the same linear transformation...
But, if $A$ is a $ntimes n$ symmetric matrix, then $A$ is diagonalizable and there is a invertible $P$ such that $A=P DP^{-1}$, where $D=diag(lambda,cdots,lambda)$.
$endgroup$
Your definition of scalar matrix is a diagonal matrix which every element in the diagonal are the same, right?
I assumed that the question should be "... then $A$ is a matrix similar to a scalar matrix". But you also can abuse notation and say that, in fact, $A$ "is'' a scalar matrix by the fact that similiar matrices can represent the same linear transformation...
But, if $A$ is a $ntimes n$ symmetric matrix, then $A$ is diagonalizable and there is a invertible $P$ such that $A=P DP^{-1}$, where $D=diag(lambda,cdots,lambda)$.
answered Dec 2 '18 at 4:43
RobsonRobson
769221
769221
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3022111%2fif-tilde-lambda-is-an-eigenvalue-of-a-of-multiplicity-n-then-a-is-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
1. Dont assume A is 2$times$2. Also you know that det(A-$lambda$I) = $(x-lambda)^n$.
$endgroup$
– Joel Pereira
Dec 2 '18 at 1:49