Proving $a_n>2$ where $a_k=sqrt{2a_{k-1}}$












0















Need to prove that $a_n > 2$ in the sequence: $a_k = sqrt{2a_{k-1}}$ for $k>1$.




$a_1 = 3$.



Not sure how to use the inductive hypothesis: $P(k) = sqrt{2a_{k-1}}$ to find $P(k+1)$.










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 3




    Stop trying to delete your questions.
    – fleablood
    Nov 27 '18 at 3:12










  • The induction hypothesis isn't $P(k) = sqrt{2a_{k-1}}$. The inductive hypothesis is $P(x) $ is the statement $a_k > 2$ . So to prove $P(k+1)$ we have $a_k = sqrt{2a_k} > sqrt{2cdot 2} = 2$. So $P(k+1)$ is true. That's all.
    – fleablood
    Nov 27 '18 at 5:26


















0















Need to prove that $a_n > 2$ in the sequence: $a_k = sqrt{2a_{k-1}}$ for $k>1$.




$a_1 = 3$.



Not sure how to use the inductive hypothesis: $P(k) = sqrt{2a_{k-1}}$ to find $P(k+1)$.










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 3




    Stop trying to delete your questions.
    – fleablood
    Nov 27 '18 at 3:12










  • The induction hypothesis isn't $P(k) = sqrt{2a_{k-1}}$. The inductive hypothesis is $P(x) $ is the statement $a_k > 2$ . So to prove $P(k+1)$ we have $a_k = sqrt{2a_k} > sqrt{2cdot 2} = 2$. So $P(k+1)$ is true. That's all.
    – fleablood
    Nov 27 '18 at 5:26
















0












0








0








Need to prove that $a_n > 2$ in the sequence: $a_k = sqrt{2a_{k-1}}$ for $k>1$.




$a_1 = 3$.



Not sure how to use the inductive hypothesis: $P(k) = sqrt{2a_{k-1}}$ to find $P(k+1)$.










share|cite|improve this question
















Need to prove that $a_n > 2$ in the sequence: $a_k = sqrt{2a_{k-1}}$ for $k>1$.




$a_1 = 3$.



Not sure how to use the inductive hypothesis: $P(k) = sqrt{2a_{k-1}}$ to find $P(k+1)$.







discrete-mathematics






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 27 '18 at 4:42









Blue

47.6k870151




47.6k870151










asked Nov 27 '18 at 2:20









cap

103




103








  • 3




    Stop trying to delete your questions.
    – fleablood
    Nov 27 '18 at 3:12










  • The induction hypothesis isn't $P(k) = sqrt{2a_{k-1}}$. The inductive hypothesis is $P(x) $ is the statement $a_k > 2$ . So to prove $P(k+1)$ we have $a_k = sqrt{2a_k} > sqrt{2cdot 2} = 2$. So $P(k+1)$ is true. That's all.
    – fleablood
    Nov 27 '18 at 5:26
















  • 3




    Stop trying to delete your questions.
    – fleablood
    Nov 27 '18 at 3:12










  • The induction hypothesis isn't $P(k) = sqrt{2a_{k-1}}$. The inductive hypothesis is $P(x) $ is the statement $a_k > 2$ . So to prove $P(k+1)$ we have $a_k = sqrt{2a_k} > sqrt{2cdot 2} = 2$. So $P(k+1)$ is true. That's all.
    – fleablood
    Nov 27 '18 at 5:26










3




3




Stop trying to delete your questions.
– fleablood
Nov 27 '18 at 3:12




Stop trying to delete your questions.
– fleablood
Nov 27 '18 at 3:12












The induction hypothesis isn't $P(k) = sqrt{2a_{k-1}}$. The inductive hypothesis is $P(x) $ is the statement $a_k > 2$ . So to prove $P(k+1)$ we have $a_k = sqrt{2a_k} > sqrt{2cdot 2} = 2$. So $P(k+1)$ is true. That's all.
– fleablood
Nov 27 '18 at 5:26






The induction hypothesis isn't $P(k) = sqrt{2a_{k-1}}$. The inductive hypothesis is $P(x) $ is the statement $a_k > 2$ . So to prove $P(k+1)$ we have $a_k = sqrt{2a_k} > sqrt{2cdot 2} = 2$. So $P(k+1)$ is true. That's all.
– fleablood
Nov 27 '18 at 5:26












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2














You first need to show your base case. For $k = 2$, we have
$$a_2 = sqrt{2 a_1} = sqrt{2 cdot 3} = (sqrt{2})(sqrt{3}) > (sqrt{2})(sqrt{2}) = 2$$



Now let $P(k)$ be the statement: $a_k > 2$ (notice that we don't set $P(k)$ equal to anything, it just represents the statement). $P(k)$ is usually called the inductive hypothesis.



We need to show that this implies $P(k + 1)$ (which is the statement that $a_{k + 1} > 2$). Notice that we'll go through a nearly identical process as the base case. We have,
begin{align}
a_{k+1} &= sqrt{2 a_k}\
&= (sqrt{2})(sqrt{a_k})\
end{align}

But by the inductive hypothesis, we have that $a_k > 2 Rightarrow sqrt{a_k} > sqrt{2} Rightarrow (sqrt{2})(sqrt{a_k}) > (sqrt{2})(sqrt{2}) = 2$ so that $a_{k+1} > 2$, which shows $P(k+1)$.



Hence by the principle of mathematical induction, we are done :)






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3015244%2fproving-a-n2-where-a-k-sqrt2a-k-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2














    You first need to show your base case. For $k = 2$, we have
    $$a_2 = sqrt{2 a_1} = sqrt{2 cdot 3} = (sqrt{2})(sqrt{3}) > (sqrt{2})(sqrt{2}) = 2$$



    Now let $P(k)$ be the statement: $a_k > 2$ (notice that we don't set $P(k)$ equal to anything, it just represents the statement). $P(k)$ is usually called the inductive hypothesis.



    We need to show that this implies $P(k + 1)$ (which is the statement that $a_{k + 1} > 2$). Notice that we'll go through a nearly identical process as the base case. We have,
    begin{align}
    a_{k+1} &= sqrt{2 a_k}\
    &= (sqrt{2})(sqrt{a_k})\
    end{align}

    But by the inductive hypothesis, we have that $a_k > 2 Rightarrow sqrt{a_k} > sqrt{2} Rightarrow (sqrt{2})(sqrt{a_k}) > (sqrt{2})(sqrt{2}) = 2$ so that $a_{k+1} > 2$, which shows $P(k+1)$.



    Hence by the principle of mathematical induction, we are done :)






    share|cite|improve this answer


























      2














      You first need to show your base case. For $k = 2$, we have
      $$a_2 = sqrt{2 a_1} = sqrt{2 cdot 3} = (sqrt{2})(sqrt{3}) > (sqrt{2})(sqrt{2}) = 2$$



      Now let $P(k)$ be the statement: $a_k > 2$ (notice that we don't set $P(k)$ equal to anything, it just represents the statement). $P(k)$ is usually called the inductive hypothesis.



      We need to show that this implies $P(k + 1)$ (which is the statement that $a_{k + 1} > 2$). Notice that we'll go through a nearly identical process as the base case. We have,
      begin{align}
      a_{k+1} &= sqrt{2 a_k}\
      &= (sqrt{2})(sqrt{a_k})\
      end{align}

      But by the inductive hypothesis, we have that $a_k > 2 Rightarrow sqrt{a_k} > sqrt{2} Rightarrow (sqrt{2})(sqrt{a_k}) > (sqrt{2})(sqrt{2}) = 2$ so that $a_{k+1} > 2$, which shows $P(k+1)$.



      Hence by the principle of mathematical induction, we are done :)






      share|cite|improve this answer
























        2












        2








        2






        You first need to show your base case. For $k = 2$, we have
        $$a_2 = sqrt{2 a_1} = sqrt{2 cdot 3} = (sqrt{2})(sqrt{3}) > (sqrt{2})(sqrt{2}) = 2$$



        Now let $P(k)$ be the statement: $a_k > 2$ (notice that we don't set $P(k)$ equal to anything, it just represents the statement). $P(k)$ is usually called the inductive hypothesis.



        We need to show that this implies $P(k + 1)$ (which is the statement that $a_{k + 1} > 2$). Notice that we'll go through a nearly identical process as the base case. We have,
        begin{align}
        a_{k+1} &= sqrt{2 a_k}\
        &= (sqrt{2})(sqrt{a_k})\
        end{align}

        But by the inductive hypothesis, we have that $a_k > 2 Rightarrow sqrt{a_k} > sqrt{2} Rightarrow (sqrt{2})(sqrt{a_k}) > (sqrt{2})(sqrt{2}) = 2$ so that $a_{k+1} > 2$, which shows $P(k+1)$.



        Hence by the principle of mathematical induction, we are done :)






        share|cite|improve this answer












        You first need to show your base case. For $k = 2$, we have
        $$a_2 = sqrt{2 a_1} = sqrt{2 cdot 3} = (sqrt{2})(sqrt{3}) > (sqrt{2})(sqrt{2}) = 2$$



        Now let $P(k)$ be the statement: $a_k > 2$ (notice that we don't set $P(k)$ equal to anything, it just represents the statement). $P(k)$ is usually called the inductive hypothesis.



        We need to show that this implies $P(k + 1)$ (which is the statement that $a_{k + 1} > 2$). Notice that we'll go through a nearly identical process as the base case. We have,
        begin{align}
        a_{k+1} &= sqrt{2 a_k}\
        &= (sqrt{2})(sqrt{a_k})\
        end{align}

        But by the inductive hypothesis, we have that $a_k > 2 Rightarrow sqrt{a_k} > sqrt{2} Rightarrow (sqrt{2})(sqrt{a_k}) > (sqrt{2})(sqrt{2}) = 2$ so that $a_{k+1} > 2$, which shows $P(k+1)$.



        Hence by the principle of mathematical induction, we are done :)







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Nov 27 '18 at 2:52









        AlkaKadri

        1,459411




        1,459411






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3015244%2fproving-a-n2-where-a-k-sqrt2a-k-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Quarter-circle Tiles

            build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

            Mont Emei