intertext / shortintertext with revtex gives large spurious spacing
I am in the situation of using intertext
/shortintertext
with the Revtex document class, but it seems there are some spacing issues.
Consider:
documentclass[aps,prl,reprint]{revtex4-1}
% documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools}
usepackage{bm}
usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
usepackage{lipsum}
begin{document}
lipsum*[1]
begin{subequations}
begin{align}
varepsilon_0(bm{q}) &= varepsilon_1(bm{q}) = 0 \
varepsilon_2(bm{q}) &=beta bigl[ 4(1 - J') + 4J' Q - 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr]\
varepsilon_3(bm{q}) &= beta bigl[4(1 - J') + 4J' Q + 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr] ,, \
shortintertext{and}
Q &= a + b + c + d + e + f - 3
end{align}
end{subequations}
lipsum*[1-3]
end{document}
and there is large spacing before and after the and
text.
This is not present if I switch out the document class to article
, so how to fix this?
ps. Strangely, using shortintertext
gives rise to a larger spacing than intertext
.. why is this so?
spacing align revtex intertext
add a comment |
I am in the situation of using intertext
/shortintertext
with the Revtex document class, but it seems there are some spacing issues.
Consider:
documentclass[aps,prl,reprint]{revtex4-1}
% documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools}
usepackage{bm}
usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
usepackage{lipsum}
begin{document}
lipsum*[1]
begin{subequations}
begin{align}
varepsilon_0(bm{q}) &= varepsilon_1(bm{q}) = 0 \
varepsilon_2(bm{q}) &=beta bigl[ 4(1 - J') + 4J' Q - 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr]\
varepsilon_3(bm{q}) &= beta bigl[4(1 - J') + 4J' Q + 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr] ,, \
shortintertext{and}
Q &= a + b + c + d + e + f - 3
end{align}
end{subequations}
lipsum*[1-3]
end{document}
and there is large spacing before and after the and
text.
This is not present if I switch out the document class to article
, so how to fix this?
ps. Strangely, using shortintertext
gives rise to a larger spacing than intertext
.. why is this so?
spacing align revtex intertext
1
Does adding the directiveraggedbottom
in the preamble make a difference?
– Mico
10 hours ago
1
@Mico No, unfortunately not. (I placed it right before begindocument). I don't think this is the usual spurious spacing, from, say, poor float placement.
– ksgj1
10 hours ago
add a comment |
I am in the situation of using intertext
/shortintertext
with the Revtex document class, but it seems there are some spacing issues.
Consider:
documentclass[aps,prl,reprint]{revtex4-1}
% documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools}
usepackage{bm}
usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
usepackage{lipsum}
begin{document}
lipsum*[1]
begin{subequations}
begin{align}
varepsilon_0(bm{q}) &= varepsilon_1(bm{q}) = 0 \
varepsilon_2(bm{q}) &=beta bigl[ 4(1 - J') + 4J' Q - 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr]\
varepsilon_3(bm{q}) &= beta bigl[4(1 - J') + 4J' Q + 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr] ,, \
shortintertext{and}
Q &= a + b + c + d + e + f - 3
end{align}
end{subequations}
lipsum*[1-3]
end{document}
and there is large spacing before and after the and
text.
This is not present if I switch out the document class to article
, so how to fix this?
ps. Strangely, using shortintertext
gives rise to a larger spacing than intertext
.. why is this so?
spacing align revtex intertext
I am in the situation of using intertext
/shortintertext
with the Revtex document class, but it seems there are some spacing issues.
Consider:
documentclass[aps,prl,reprint]{revtex4-1}
% documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools}
usepackage{bm}
usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
usepackage{lipsum}
begin{document}
lipsum*[1]
begin{subequations}
begin{align}
varepsilon_0(bm{q}) &= varepsilon_1(bm{q}) = 0 \
varepsilon_2(bm{q}) &=beta bigl[ 4(1 - J') + 4J' Q - 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr]\
varepsilon_3(bm{q}) &= beta bigl[4(1 - J') + 4J' Q + 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr] ,, \
shortintertext{and}
Q &= a + b + c + d + e + f - 3
end{align}
end{subequations}
lipsum*[1-3]
end{document}
and there is large spacing before and after the and
text.
This is not present if I switch out the document class to article
, so how to fix this?
ps. Strangely, using shortintertext
gives rise to a larger spacing than intertext
.. why is this so?
spacing align revtex intertext
spacing align revtex intertext
edited 10 hours ago
asked 10 hours ago
ksgj1
350114
350114
1
Does adding the directiveraggedbottom
in the preamble make a difference?
– Mico
10 hours ago
1
@Mico No, unfortunately not. (I placed it right before begindocument). I don't think this is the usual spurious spacing, from, say, poor float placement.
– ksgj1
10 hours ago
add a comment |
1
Does adding the directiveraggedbottom
in the preamble make a difference?
– Mico
10 hours ago
1
@Mico No, unfortunately not. (I placed it right before begindocument). I don't think this is the usual spurious spacing, from, say, poor float placement.
– ksgj1
10 hours ago
1
1
Does adding the directive
raggedbottom
in the preamble make a difference?– Mico
10 hours ago
Does adding the directive
raggedbottom
in the preamble make a difference?– Mico
10 hours ago
1
1
@Mico No, unfortunately not. (I placed it right before begindocument). I don't think this is the usual spurious spacing, from, say, poor float placement.
– ksgj1
10 hours ago
@Mico No, unfortunately not. (I placed it right before begindocument). I don't think this is the usual spurious spacing, from, say, poor float placement.
– ksgj1
10 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
You can modify the vertical space before and after both intertext
and shortintertext
: here's a possibility, adjust to suit your needs.
documentclass[aps,prl,reprint]{revtex4-1}
usepackage{mathtools}
usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
usepackage{bm}
usepackage{lipsum}
mathtoolsset{
above-shortintertext-sep=-belowdisplayshortskip,
below-shortintertext-sep=-abovedisplayskip,
above-intertext-sep=0pt, % default
below-intertext-sep=-.5abovedisplayskip,
}
begin{document}
lipsum*[1]
begin{subequations}
begin{align}
varepsilon_0(bm{q}) &= varepsilon_1(bm{q}) = 0 \
varepsilon_2(bm{q}) &=beta bigl[ 4(1 - J') + 4J' Q - 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr]\
varepsilon_3(bm{q}) &= beta bigl[4(1 - J') + 4J' Q + 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr] ,, \
shortintertext{and}
Q &= a + b + c + d + e + f - 3
end{align}
end{subequations}
lipsum*[4]
begin{subequations}
begin{align}
varepsilon_0(bm{q}) &= varepsilon_1(bm{q}) = 0 \
varepsilon_2(bm{q}) &=beta bigl[ 4(1 - J') + 4J' Q - 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr]\
varepsilon_3(bm{q}) &= beta bigl[4(1 - J') + 4J' Q + 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr] ,, \
intertext{and}
Q &= a + b + c + d + e + f - 3
end{align}
end{subequations}
lipsum
end{document}
this works great, thanks!
– ksgj1
8 hours ago
add a comment |
I propose this work-around: use the optional argument for intertext
, introduced by package nccmath
:
documentclass[aps,prl,reprint]{revtex4-1}
% documentclass{article}
usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
usepackage{mathtools, bm, nccmath}
usepackage{lipsum}
begin{document}
lipsum*[1]
begin{subequations}
begin{align}
varepsilon_0(bm{q}) &= varepsilon_1(bm{q}) = 0 \
varepsilon_2(bm{q}) &=beta bigl[ 4(1 - J') + 4J' Q - 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr]\
varepsilon_3(bm{q}) &= beta bigl[4(1 - J') + 4J' Q + 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr] ,, \
intertext[0 ex]{and}
Q &= a + b + c + d + e + f - 3
end{align}
end{subequations}
lipsum*[1-3]
end{document}
nccmath redefines theintertext
command? is there any other redefinitions that I should worry about when using in conjunction with amsmath, mathtools etc.? (incompatibilities, redefinitions using different syntax) If I load this package I can no longer useshortintertext?
– ksgj1
9 hours ago
1
I don't think this one is incompatible, as nccmath loadsamsmath
. I use it mainly for its medium size formula commands and environment, with which I never hadd any problem. The redefinition of intertext is documented on p.12 of the documentation (commented code).
– Bernard
9 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f468079%2fintertext-shortintertext-with-revtex-gives-large-spurious-spacing%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You can modify the vertical space before and after both intertext
and shortintertext
: here's a possibility, adjust to suit your needs.
documentclass[aps,prl,reprint]{revtex4-1}
usepackage{mathtools}
usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
usepackage{bm}
usepackage{lipsum}
mathtoolsset{
above-shortintertext-sep=-belowdisplayshortskip,
below-shortintertext-sep=-abovedisplayskip,
above-intertext-sep=0pt, % default
below-intertext-sep=-.5abovedisplayskip,
}
begin{document}
lipsum*[1]
begin{subequations}
begin{align}
varepsilon_0(bm{q}) &= varepsilon_1(bm{q}) = 0 \
varepsilon_2(bm{q}) &=beta bigl[ 4(1 - J') + 4J' Q - 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr]\
varepsilon_3(bm{q}) &= beta bigl[4(1 - J') + 4J' Q + 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr] ,, \
shortintertext{and}
Q &= a + b + c + d + e + f - 3
end{align}
end{subequations}
lipsum*[4]
begin{subequations}
begin{align}
varepsilon_0(bm{q}) &= varepsilon_1(bm{q}) = 0 \
varepsilon_2(bm{q}) &=beta bigl[ 4(1 - J') + 4J' Q - 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr]\
varepsilon_3(bm{q}) &= beta bigl[4(1 - J') + 4J' Q + 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr] ,, \
intertext{and}
Q &= a + b + c + d + e + f - 3
end{align}
end{subequations}
lipsum
end{document}
this works great, thanks!
– ksgj1
8 hours ago
add a comment |
You can modify the vertical space before and after both intertext
and shortintertext
: here's a possibility, adjust to suit your needs.
documentclass[aps,prl,reprint]{revtex4-1}
usepackage{mathtools}
usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
usepackage{bm}
usepackage{lipsum}
mathtoolsset{
above-shortintertext-sep=-belowdisplayshortskip,
below-shortintertext-sep=-abovedisplayskip,
above-intertext-sep=0pt, % default
below-intertext-sep=-.5abovedisplayskip,
}
begin{document}
lipsum*[1]
begin{subequations}
begin{align}
varepsilon_0(bm{q}) &= varepsilon_1(bm{q}) = 0 \
varepsilon_2(bm{q}) &=beta bigl[ 4(1 - J') + 4J' Q - 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr]\
varepsilon_3(bm{q}) &= beta bigl[4(1 - J') + 4J' Q + 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr] ,, \
shortintertext{and}
Q &= a + b + c + d + e + f - 3
end{align}
end{subequations}
lipsum*[4]
begin{subequations}
begin{align}
varepsilon_0(bm{q}) &= varepsilon_1(bm{q}) = 0 \
varepsilon_2(bm{q}) &=beta bigl[ 4(1 - J') + 4J' Q - 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr]\
varepsilon_3(bm{q}) &= beta bigl[4(1 - J') + 4J' Q + 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr] ,, \
intertext{and}
Q &= a + b + c + d + e + f - 3
end{align}
end{subequations}
lipsum
end{document}
this works great, thanks!
– ksgj1
8 hours ago
add a comment |
You can modify the vertical space before and after both intertext
and shortintertext
: here's a possibility, adjust to suit your needs.
documentclass[aps,prl,reprint]{revtex4-1}
usepackage{mathtools}
usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
usepackage{bm}
usepackage{lipsum}
mathtoolsset{
above-shortintertext-sep=-belowdisplayshortskip,
below-shortintertext-sep=-abovedisplayskip,
above-intertext-sep=0pt, % default
below-intertext-sep=-.5abovedisplayskip,
}
begin{document}
lipsum*[1]
begin{subequations}
begin{align}
varepsilon_0(bm{q}) &= varepsilon_1(bm{q}) = 0 \
varepsilon_2(bm{q}) &=beta bigl[ 4(1 - J') + 4J' Q - 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr]\
varepsilon_3(bm{q}) &= beta bigl[4(1 - J') + 4J' Q + 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr] ,, \
shortintertext{and}
Q &= a + b + c + d + e + f - 3
end{align}
end{subequations}
lipsum*[4]
begin{subequations}
begin{align}
varepsilon_0(bm{q}) &= varepsilon_1(bm{q}) = 0 \
varepsilon_2(bm{q}) &=beta bigl[ 4(1 - J') + 4J' Q - 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr]\
varepsilon_3(bm{q}) &= beta bigl[4(1 - J') + 4J' Q + 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr] ,, \
intertext{and}
Q &= a + b + c + d + e + f - 3
end{align}
end{subequations}
lipsum
end{document}
You can modify the vertical space before and after both intertext
and shortintertext
: here's a possibility, adjust to suit your needs.
documentclass[aps,prl,reprint]{revtex4-1}
usepackage{mathtools}
usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
usepackage{bm}
usepackage{lipsum}
mathtoolsset{
above-shortintertext-sep=-belowdisplayshortskip,
below-shortintertext-sep=-abovedisplayskip,
above-intertext-sep=0pt, % default
below-intertext-sep=-.5abovedisplayskip,
}
begin{document}
lipsum*[1]
begin{subequations}
begin{align}
varepsilon_0(bm{q}) &= varepsilon_1(bm{q}) = 0 \
varepsilon_2(bm{q}) &=beta bigl[ 4(1 - J') + 4J' Q - 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr]\
varepsilon_3(bm{q}) &= beta bigl[4(1 - J') + 4J' Q + 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr] ,, \
shortintertext{and}
Q &= a + b + c + d + e + f - 3
end{align}
end{subequations}
lipsum*[4]
begin{subequations}
begin{align}
varepsilon_0(bm{q}) &= varepsilon_1(bm{q}) = 0 \
varepsilon_2(bm{q}) &=beta bigl[ 4(1 - J') + 4J' Q - 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr]\
varepsilon_3(bm{q}) &= beta bigl[4(1 - J') + 4J' Q + 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr] ,, \
intertext{and}
Q &= a + b + c + d + e + f - 3
end{align}
end{subequations}
lipsum
end{document}
answered 9 hours ago
egreg
709k8618823165
709k8618823165
this works great, thanks!
– ksgj1
8 hours ago
add a comment |
this works great, thanks!
– ksgj1
8 hours ago
this works great, thanks!
– ksgj1
8 hours ago
this works great, thanks!
– ksgj1
8 hours ago
add a comment |
I propose this work-around: use the optional argument for intertext
, introduced by package nccmath
:
documentclass[aps,prl,reprint]{revtex4-1}
% documentclass{article}
usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
usepackage{mathtools, bm, nccmath}
usepackage{lipsum}
begin{document}
lipsum*[1]
begin{subequations}
begin{align}
varepsilon_0(bm{q}) &= varepsilon_1(bm{q}) = 0 \
varepsilon_2(bm{q}) &=beta bigl[ 4(1 - J') + 4J' Q - 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr]\
varepsilon_3(bm{q}) &= beta bigl[4(1 - J') + 4J' Q + 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr] ,, \
intertext[0 ex]{and}
Q &= a + b + c + d + e + f - 3
end{align}
end{subequations}
lipsum*[1-3]
end{document}
nccmath redefines theintertext
command? is there any other redefinitions that I should worry about when using in conjunction with amsmath, mathtools etc.? (incompatibilities, redefinitions using different syntax) If I load this package I can no longer useshortintertext?
– ksgj1
9 hours ago
1
I don't think this one is incompatible, as nccmath loadsamsmath
. I use it mainly for its medium size formula commands and environment, with which I never hadd any problem. The redefinition of intertext is documented on p.12 of the documentation (commented code).
– Bernard
9 hours ago
add a comment |
I propose this work-around: use the optional argument for intertext
, introduced by package nccmath
:
documentclass[aps,prl,reprint]{revtex4-1}
% documentclass{article}
usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
usepackage{mathtools, bm, nccmath}
usepackage{lipsum}
begin{document}
lipsum*[1]
begin{subequations}
begin{align}
varepsilon_0(bm{q}) &= varepsilon_1(bm{q}) = 0 \
varepsilon_2(bm{q}) &=beta bigl[ 4(1 - J') + 4J' Q - 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr]\
varepsilon_3(bm{q}) &= beta bigl[4(1 - J') + 4J' Q + 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr] ,, \
intertext[0 ex]{and}
Q &= a + b + c + d + e + f - 3
end{align}
end{subequations}
lipsum*[1-3]
end{document}
nccmath redefines theintertext
command? is there any other redefinitions that I should worry about when using in conjunction with amsmath, mathtools etc.? (incompatibilities, redefinitions using different syntax) If I load this package I can no longer useshortintertext?
– ksgj1
9 hours ago
1
I don't think this one is incompatible, as nccmath loadsamsmath
. I use it mainly for its medium size formula commands and environment, with which I never hadd any problem. The redefinition of intertext is documented on p.12 of the documentation (commented code).
– Bernard
9 hours ago
add a comment |
I propose this work-around: use the optional argument for intertext
, introduced by package nccmath
:
documentclass[aps,prl,reprint]{revtex4-1}
% documentclass{article}
usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
usepackage{mathtools, bm, nccmath}
usepackage{lipsum}
begin{document}
lipsum*[1]
begin{subequations}
begin{align}
varepsilon_0(bm{q}) &= varepsilon_1(bm{q}) = 0 \
varepsilon_2(bm{q}) &=beta bigl[ 4(1 - J') + 4J' Q - 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr]\
varepsilon_3(bm{q}) &= beta bigl[4(1 - J') + 4J' Q + 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr] ,, \
intertext[0 ex]{and}
Q &= a + b + c + d + e + f - 3
end{align}
end{subequations}
lipsum*[1-3]
end{document}
I propose this work-around: use the optional argument for intertext
, introduced by package nccmath
:
documentclass[aps,prl,reprint]{revtex4-1}
% documentclass{article}
usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
usepackage{mathtools, bm, nccmath}
usepackage{lipsum}
begin{document}
lipsum*[1]
begin{subequations}
begin{align}
varepsilon_0(bm{q}) &= varepsilon_1(bm{q}) = 0 \
varepsilon_2(bm{q}) &=beta bigl[ 4(1 - J') + 4J' Q - 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr]\
varepsilon_3(bm{q}) &= beta bigl[4(1 - J') + 4J' Q + 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr] ,, \
intertext[0 ex]{and}
Q &= a + b + c + d + e + f - 3
end{align}
end{subequations}
lipsum*[1-3]
end{document}
answered 10 hours ago
Bernard
166k769194
166k769194
nccmath redefines theintertext
command? is there any other redefinitions that I should worry about when using in conjunction with amsmath, mathtools etc.? (incompatibilities, redefinitions using different syntax) If I load this package I can no longer useshortintertext?
– ksgj1
9 hours ago
1
I don't think this one is incompatible, as nccmath loadsamsmath
. I use it mainly for its medium size formula commands and environment, with which I never hadd any problem. The redefinition of intertext is documented on p.12 of the documentation (commented code).
– Bernard
9 hours ago
add a comment |
nccmath redefines theintertext
command? is there any other redefinitions that I should worry about when using in conjunction with amsmath, mathtools etc.? (incompatibilities, redefinitions using different syntax) If I load this package I can no longer useshortintertext?
– ksgj1
9 hours ago
1
I don't think this one is incompatible, as nccmath loadsamsmath
. I use it mainly for its medium size formula commands and environment, with which I never hadd any problem. The redefinition of intertext is documented on p.12 of the documentation (commented code).
– Bernard
9 hours ago
nccmath redefines the
intertext
command? is there any other redefinitions that I should worry about when using in conjunction with amsmath, mathtools etc.? (incompatibilities, redefinitions using different syntax) If I load this package I can no longer use shortintertext?
– ksgj1
9 hours ago
nccmath redefines the
intertext
command? is there any other redefinitions that I should worry about when using in conjunction with amsmath, mathtools etc.? (incompatibilities, redefinitions using different syntax) If I load this package I can no longer use shortintertext?
– ksgj1
9 hours ago
1
1
I don't think this one is incompatible, as nccmath loads
amsmath
. I use it mainly for its medium size formula commands and environment, with which I never hadd any problem. The redefinition of intertext is documented on p.12 of the documentation (commented code).– Bernard
9 hours ago
I don't think this one is incompatible, as nccmath loads
amsmath
. I use it mainly for its medium size formula commands and environment, with which I never hadd any problem. The redefinition of intertext is documented on p.12 of the documentation (commented code).– Bernard
9 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f468079%2fintertext-shortintertext-with-revtex-gives-large-spurious-spacing%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Does adding the directive
raggedbottom
in the preamble make a difference?– Mico
10 hours ago
1
@Mico No, unfortunately not. (I placed it right before begindocument). I don't think this is the usual spurious spacing, from, say, poor float placement.
– ksgj1
10 hours ago