Taylor Series expansion of an implicitly defined function $x^2 +y^2=y, y(0)=0$
Find the first 6 terms of the Taylor series for $y$ in powers of $x$ of the following implicitly defined function;
$$x^2 +y^2=y, y(0)=0$$
I'm a bit stuck in how to proceed do i need to implicitly differentiate the function such that $y'=frac{-2x}{(1-2y)}$ and again so as to find $y'',y^{(3)},...,y^{(6)}$ and then plug these into the Taylor expansion and set $y=0$ or $y=x$?
or do I define say $f(x,y):=x^2+y^2-y=0$ and do a multivariate expansion?
taylor-expansion
add a comment |
Find the first 6 terms of the Taylor series for $y$ in powers of $x$ of the following implicitly defined function;
$$x^2 +y^2=y, y(0)=0$$
I'm a bit stuck in how to proceed do i need to implicitly differentiate the function such that $y'=frac{-2x}{(1-2y)}$ and again so as to find $y'',y^{(3)},...,y^{(6)}$ and then plug these into the Taylor expansion and set $y=0$ or $y=x$?
or do I define say $f(x,y):=x^2+y^2-y=0$ and do a multivariate expansion?
taylor-expansion
the right-hand side "y" could represent f(x,y) and not the variable "y". Without this we don't have a relation or a function to apply T.S. for. Also see: math.stackexchange.com/questions/69610/…
– NoChance
Nov 26 '18 at 19:25
add a comment |
Find the first 6 terms of the Taylor series for $y$ in powers of $x$ of the following implicitly defined function;
$$x^2 +y^2=y, y(0)=0$$
I'm a bit stuck in how to proceed do i need to implicitly differentiate the function such that $y'=frac{-2x}{(1-2y)}$ and again so as to find $y'',y^{(3)},...,y^{(6)}$ and then plug these into the Taylor expansion and set $y=0$ or $y=x$?
or do I define say $f(x,y):=x^2+y^2-y=0$ and do a multivariate expansion?
taylor-expansion
Find the first 6 terms of the Taylor series for $y$ in powers of $x$ of the following implicitly defined function;
$$x^2 +y^2=y, y(0)=0$$
I'm a bit stuck in how to proceed do i need to implicitly differentiate the function such that $y'=frac{-2x}{(1-2y)}$ and again so as to find $y'',y^{(3)},...,y^{(6)}$ and then plug these into the Taylor expansion and set $y=0$ or $y=x$?
or do I define say $f(x,y):=x^2+y^2-y=0$ and do a multivariate expansion?
taylor-expansion
taylor-expansion
asked Nov 26 '18 at 19:06
seraphimk
1429
1429
the right-hand side "y" could represent f(x,y) and not the variable "y". Without this we don't have a relation or a function to apply T.S. for. Also see: math.stackexchange.com/questions/69610/…
– NoChance
Nov 26 '18 at 19:25
add a comment |
the right-hand side "y" could represent f(x,y) and not the variable "y". Without this we don't have a relation or a function to apply T.S. for. Also see: math.stackexchange.com/questions/69610/…
– NoChance
Nov 26 '18 at 19:25
the right-hand side "y" could represent f(x,y) and not the variable "y". Without this we don't have a relation or a function to apply T.S. for. Also see: math.stackexchange.com/questions/69610/…
– NoChance
Nov 26 '18 at 19:25
the right-hand side "y" could represent f(x,y) and not the variable "y". Without this we don't have a relation or a function to apply T.S. for. Also see: math.stackexchange.com/questions/69610/…
– NoChance
Nov 26 '18 at 19:25
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
hint
If$$y=a_1x+a_2x^2+...a_6x^6+...$$
then
$$y^2=a_1^2x^2+a_2^2x^4+a_3^2x^6+2a_1a_2x^3+2a_1a_3x^4+2a_1a_4x^5+2a_1a_5x^6+2a_2a_3x^5+2a_2a_4x^6+...$$
on the other hand
$$y-y^2=x^2$$
thus by identification,
$a_1=0$
$a_2=1$
can you take it.
add a comment |
Your first approach is the correct one. Although, to find $y''(0)$, I think it's easier to differentiate $2x+2yy'=y'$ and then solve for $y''$ than to differentiate $frac{-2x}{1-2y}$. And so on for $y'''(0)$ etc.
would I then set y=0? such that for example $y'(0)=-2x$ ?
– seraphimk
Nov 26 '18 at 19:41
@seraphimk Almost. You set $x=0$, and use $y(0)=0$ to get $y'(0)=0$. Next you differentiate $2x+2yy'=y'$, insert $x=0$ and use $y(0)=0$ and $y'(0)=0$ to find $y''(0)$. And so on.
– Arthur
Nov 26 '18 at 20:54
add a comment |
Just added for your curiosity.
If you use hamam_Abdallah's hint, writing
$$y=sum_{k=1}^n a_k,x^k$$ and replacing, you will get
$$0=-a_1 x+left(a_1^2-a_2+1right) x^2+(2 a_1 a_2-a_3) x^3+left(a_2^2+2 a_1
a_3-a_4right) x^4+(2 a_2 a_3+2 a_1 a_4-a_5) x^5+left(a_3^2+2 a_2
a_4+2 a_1 a_5right) x^6+(2 d_3 d_4+2 d_2 d_5+2 d_1 d_6-d_7) x^7+cdots$$ Since this holds for all $x$, set each coefficient equal to $0$ (do it for one at the time). You will quickly notice that $a_{2k+1}=0$ and that, for $a_{2k}$ the sequence is ${1,1,2,5,14,42,132,429,1430,cdots}$. These are Catalan numbers which you will find in many counting problems.
This makes
$$y=sum_{k=1}^infty C_k, x^{2k}=sum_{k=1}^infty frac{(2n)!}{n! , (n+1)!}, x^{2k}$$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3014768%2ftaylor-series-expansion-of-an-implicitly-defined-function-x2-y2-y-y0-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
hint
If$$y=a_1x+a_2x^2+...a_6x^6+...$$
then
$$y^2=a_1^2x^2+a_2^2x^4+a_3^2x^6+2a_1a_2x^3+2a_1a_3x^4+2a_1a_4x^5+2a_1a_5x^6+2a_2a_3x^5+2a_2a_4x^6+...$$
on the other hand
$$y-y^2=x^2$$
thus by identification,
$a_1=0$
$a_2=1$
can you take it.
add a comment |
hint
If$$y=a_1x+a_2x^2+...a_6x^6+...$$
then
$$y^2=a_1^2x^2+a_2^2x^4+a_3^2x^6+2a_1a_2x^3+2a_1a_3x^4+2a_1a_4x^5+2a_1a_5x^6+2a_2a_3x^5+2a_2a_4x^6+...$$
on the other hand
$$y-y^2=x^2$$
thus by identification,
$a_1=0$
$a_2=1$
can you take it.
add a comment |
hint
If$$y=a_1x+a_2x^2+...a_6x^6+...$$
then
$$y^2=a_1^2x^2+a_2^2x^4+a_3^2x^6+2a_1a_2x^3+2a_1a_3x^4+2a_1a_4x^5+2a_1a_5x^6+2a_2a_3x^5+2a_2a_4x^6+...$$
on the other hand
$$y-y^2=x^2$$
thus by identification,
$a_1=0$
$a_2=1$
can you take it.
hint
If$$y=a_1x+a_2x^2+...a_6x^6+...$$
then
$$y^2=a_1^2x^2+a_2^2x^4+a_3^2x^6+2a_1a_2x^3+2a_1a_3x^4+2a_1a_4x^5+2a_1a_5x^6+2a_2a_3x^5+2a_2a_4x^6+...$$
on the other hand
$$y-y^2=x^2$$
thus by identification,
$a_1=0$
$a_2=1$
can you take it.
edited Nov 26 '18 at 19:31
answered Nov 26 '18 at 19:11
hamam_Abdallah
37.9k21634
37.9k21634
add a comment |
add a comment |
Your first approach is the correct one. Although, to find $y''(0)$, I think it's easier to differentiate $2x+2yy'=y'$ and then solve for $y''$ than to differentiate $frac{-2x}{1-2y}$. And so on for $y'''(0)$ etc.
would I then set y=0? such that for example $y'(0)=-2x$ ?
– seraphimk
Nov 26 '18 at 19:41
@seraphimk Almost. You set $x=0$, and use $y(0)=0$ to get $y'(0)=0$. Next you differentiate $2x+2yy'=y'$, insert $x=0$ and use $y(0)=0$ and $y'(0)=0$ to find $y''(0)$. And so on.
– Arthur
Nov 26 '18 at 20:54
add a comment |
Your first approach is the correct one. Although, to find $y''(0)$, I think it's easier to differentiate $2x+2yy'=y'$ and then solve for $y''$ than to differentiate $frac{-2x}{1-2y}$. And so on for $y'''(0)$ etc.
would I then set y=0? such that for example $y'(0)=-2x$ ?
– seraphimk
Nov 26 '18 at 19:41
@seraphimk Almost. You set $x=0$, and use $y(0)=0$ to get $y'(0)=0$. Next you differentiate $2x+2yy'=y'$, insert $x=0$ and use $y(0)=0$ and $y'(0)=0$ to find $y''(0)$. And so on.
– Arthur
Nov 26 '18 at 20:54
add a comment |
Your first approach is the correct one. Although, to find $y''(0)$, I think it's easier to differentiate $2x+2yy'=y'$ and then solve for $y''$ than to differentiate $frac{-2x}{1-2y}$. And so on for $y'''(0)$ etc.
Your first approach is the correct one. Although, to find $y''(0)$, I think it's easier to differentiate $2x+2yy'=y'$ and then solve for $y''$ than to differentiate $frac{-2x}{1-2y}$. And so on for $y'''(0)$ etc.
answered Nov 26 '18 at 19:10
Arthur
110k7105186
110k7105186
would I then set y=0? such that for example $y'(0)=-2x$ ?
– seraphimk
Nov 26 '18 at 19:41
@seraphimk Almost. You set $x=0$, and use $y(0)=0$ to get $y'(0)=0$. Next you differentiate $2x+2yy'=y'$, insert $x=0$ and use $y(0)=0$ and $y'(0)=0$ to find $y''(0)$. And so on.
– Arthur
Nov 26 '18 at 20:54
add a comment |
would I then set y=0? such that for example $y'(0)=-2x$ ?
– seraphimk
Nov 26 '18 at 19:41
@seraphimk Almost. You set $x=0$, and use $y(0)=0$ to get $y'(0)=0$. Next you differentiate $2x+2yy'=y'$, insert $x=0$ and use $y(0)=0$ and $y'(0)=0$ to find $y''(0)$. And so on.
– Arthur
Nov 26 '18 at 20:54
would I then set y=0? such that for example $y'(0)=-2x$ ?
– seraphimk
Nov 26 '18 at 19:41
would I then set y=0? such that for example $y'(0)=-2x$ ?
– seraphimk
Nov 26 '18 at 19:41
@seraphimk Almost. You set $x=0$, and use $y(0)=0$ to get $y'(0)=0$. Next you differentiate $2x+2yy'=y'$, insert $x=0$ and use $y(0)=0$ and $y'(0)=0$ to find $y''(0)$. And so on.
– Arthur
Nov 26 '18 at 20:54
@seraphimk Almost. You set $x=0$, and use $y(0)=0$ to get $y'(0)=0$. Next you differentiate $2x+2yy'=y'$, insert $x=0$ and use $y(0)=0$ and $y'(0)=0$ to find $y''(0)$. And so on.
– Arthur
Nov 26 '18 at 20:54
add a comment |
Just added for your curiosity.
If you use hamam_Abdallah's hint, writing
$$y=sum_{k=1}^n a_k,x^k$$ and replacing, you will get
$$0=-a_1 x+left(a_1^2-a_2+1right) x^2+(2 a_1 a_2-a_3) x^3+left(a_2^2+2 a_1
a_3-a_4right) x^4+(2 a_2 a_3+2 a_1 a_4-a_5) x^5+left(a_3^2+2 a_2
a_4+2 a_1 a_5right) x^6+(2 d_3 d_4+2 d_2 d_5+2 d_1 d_6-d_7) x^7+cdots$$ Since this holds for all $x$, set each coefficient equal to $0$ (do it for one at the time). You will quickly notice that $a_{2k+1}=0$ and that, for $a_{2k}$ the sequence is ${1,1,2,5,14,42,132,429,1430,cdots}$. These are Catalan numbers which you will find in many counting problems.
This makes
$$y=sum_{k=1}^infty C_k, x^{2k}=sum_{k=1}^infty frac{(2n)!}{n! , (n+1)!}, x^{2k}$$
add a comment |
Just added for your curiosity.
If you use hamam_Abdallah's hint, writing
$$y=sum_{k=1}^n a_k,x^k$$ and replacing, you will get
$$0=-a_1 x+left(a_1^2-a_2+1right) x^2+(2 a_1 a_2-a_3) x^3+left(a_2^2+2 a_1
a_3-a_4right) x^4+(2 a_2 a_3+2 a_1 a_4-a_5) x^5+left(a_3^2+2 a_2
a_4+2 a_1 a_5right) x^6+(2 d_3 d_4+2 d_2 d_5+2 d_1 d_6-d_7) x^7+cdots$$ Since this holds for all $x$, set each coefficient equal to $0$ (do it for one at the time). You will quickly notice that $a_{2k+1}=0$ and that, for $a_{2k}$ the sequence is ${1,1,2,5,14,42,132,429,1430,cdots}$. These are Catalan numbers which you will find in many counting problems.
This makes
$$y=sum_{k=1}^infty C_k, x^{2k}=sum_{k=1}^infty frac{(2n)!}{n! , (n+1)!}, x^{2k}$$
add a comment |
Just added for your curiosity.
If you use hamam_Abdallah's hint, writing
$$y=sum_{k=1}^n a_k,x^k$$ and replacing, you will get
$$0=-a_1 x+left(a_1^2-a_2+1right) x^2+(2 a_1 a_2-a_3) x^3+left(a_2^2+2 a_1
a_3-a_4right) x^4+(2 a_2 a_3+2 a_1 a_4-a_5) x^5+left(a_3^2+2 a_2
a_4+2 a_1 a_5right) x^6+(2 d_3 d_4+2 d_2 d_5+2 d_1 d_6-d_7) x^7+cdots$$ Since this holds for all $x$, set each coefficient equal to $0$ (do it for one at the time). You will quickly notice that $a_{2k+1}=0$ and that, for $a_{2k}$ the sequence is ${1,1,2,5,14,42,132,429,1430,cdots}$. These are Catalan numbers which you will find in many counting problems.
This makes
$$y=sum_{k=1}^infty C_k, x^{2k}=sum_{k=1}^infty frac{(2n)!}{n! , (n+1)!}, x^{2k}$$
Just added for your curiosity.
If you use hamam_Abdallah's hint, writing
$$y=sum_{k=1}^n a_k,x^k$$ and replacing, you will get
$$0=-a_1 x+left(a_1^2-a_2+1right) x^2+(2 a_1 a_2-a_3) x^3+left(a_2^2+2 a_1
a_3-a_4right) x^4+(2 a_2 a_3+2 a_1 a_4-a_5) x^5+left(a_3^2+2 a_2
a_4+2 a_1 a_5right) x^6+(2 d_3 d_4+2 d_2 d_5+2 d_1 d_6-d_7) x^7+cdots$$ Since this holds for all $x$, set each coefficient equal to $0$ (do it for one at the time). You will quickly notice that $a_{2k+1}=0$ and that, for $a_{2k}$ the sequence is ${1,1,2,5,14,42,132,429,1430,cdots}$. These are Catalan numbers which you will find in many counting problems.
This makes
$$y=sum_{k=1}^infty C_k, x^{2k}=sum_{k=1}^infty frac{(2n)!}{n! , (n+1)!}, x^{2k}$$
answered Nov 27 '18 at 8:01
Claude Leibovici
119k1157132
119k1157132
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3014768%2ftaylor-series-expansion-of-an-implicitly-defined-function-x2-y2-y-y0-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
the right-hand side "y" could represent f(x,y) and not the variable "y". Without this we don't have a relation or a function to apply T.S. for. Also see: math.stackexchange.com/questions/69610/…
– NoChance
Nov 26 '18 at 19:25