Meaning of “is at two removes”
In the Republic, poetry is condemned and the poets exiled just
because poetry is a successful “imitation.” Imitation is bad for
two reasons. For one thing, it is secondary, derived, not the
real thing. In that sense it is factitious, however accurate it may
be as a copy. A bed, for example, Plato argued, is already an
imitation of the “idea” of a bed, the ideal paradigm from
which each real bed is copied. A painting of a bed or a
description of it in poetry, such as Homer’s description in the
Odyssey of Odysseus’s nuptial bed, with its bedpost made of a
still-rooted olive tree’s trunk, is at two removes. It is a copy of
a copy, so who needs it?
is here "remove" as a noun.and mean: the distance between bedposts? but I don't understand "at two" here.
This passage is from a book named: On literature
This context is about Plato's opinion about poetry.
Correct me if I am wrong.
phrase-meaning sentence-meaning
add a comment |
In the Republic, poetry is condemned and the poets exiled just
because poetry is a successful “imitation.” Imitation is bad for
two reasons. For one thing, it is secondary, derived, not the
real thing. In that sense it is factitious, however accurate it may
be as a copy. A bed, for example, Plato argued, is already an
imitation of the “idea” of a bed, the ideal paradigm from
which each real bed is copied. A painting of a bed or a
description of it in poetry, such as Homer’s description in the
Odyssey of Odysseus’s nuptial bed, with its bedpost made of a
still-rooted olive tree’s trunk, is at two removes. It is a copy of
a copy, so who needs it?
is here "remove" as a noun.and mean: the distance between bedposts? but I don't understand "at two" here.
This passage is from a book named: On literature
This context is about Plato's opinion about poetry.
Correct me if I am wrong.
phrase-meaning sentence-meaning
3
Think of it as "two degrees of separation."
– Jason Bassford
11 hours ago
add a comment |
In the Republic, poetry is condemned and the poets exiled just
because poetry is a successful “imitation.” Imitation is bad for
two reasons. For one thing, it is secondary, derived, not the
real thing. In that sense it is factitious, however accurate it may
be as a copy. A bed, for example, Plato argued, is already an
imitation of the “idea” of a bed, the ideal paradigm from
which each real bed is copied. A painting of a bed or a
description of it in poetry, such as Homer’s description in the
Odyssey of Odysseus’s nuptial bed, with its bedpost made of a
still-rooted olive tree’s trunk, is at two removes. It is a copy of
a copy, so who needs it?
is here "remove" as a noun.and mean: the distance between bedposts? but I don't understand "at two" here.
This passage is from a book named: On literature
This context is about Plato's opinion about poetry.
Correct me if I am wrong.
phrase-meaning sentence-meaning
In the Republic, poetry is condemned and the poets exiled just
because poetry is a successful “imitation.” Imitation is bad for
two reasons. For one thing, it is secondary, derived, not the
real thing. In that sense it is factitious, however accurate it may
be as a copy. A bed, for example, Plato argued, is already an
imitation of the “idea” of a bed, the ideal paradigm from
which each real bed is copied. A painting of a bed or a
description of it in poetry, such as Homer’s description in the
Odyssey of Odysseus’s nuptial bed, with its bedpost made of a
still-rooted olive tree’s trunk, is at two removes. It is a copy of
a copy, so who needs it?
is here "remove" as a noun.and mean: the distance between bedposts? but I don't understand "at two" here.
This passage is from a book named: On literature
This context is about Plato's opinion about poetry.
Correct me if I am wrong.
phrase-meaning sentence-meaning
phrase-meaning sentence-meaning
edited 11 hours ago
asked 12 hours ago
Viser Hashemi
1938
1938
3
Think of it as "two degrees of separation."
– Jason Bassford
11 hours ago
add a comment |
3
Think of it as "two degrees of separation."
– Jason Bassford
11 hours ago
3
3
Think of it as "two degrees of separation."
– Jason Bassford
11 hours ago
Think of it as "two degrees of separation."
– Jason Bassford
11 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Yes, "remove" is a noun here, but it is obsolete except in a few special senses, and in this idiom: "at two removes" means "taking two (logical, or notional) steps away from something" - in this case, from the Platonic ideal, to the bed, to the image of a bed.
Many thanks. Do you mean: the bedposts of bed are in two step away from eachother or the bedpost is in two step away from something else which we don't know what it is? and Do you know the meaning of "still-rooted"
– Viser Hashemi
11 hours ago
5
It has nothing whatever to do with the bedposts, @ViserHashemi: it's talking about the conceptual separation from the ideal to the bed, and from the bed to an image of a bed.
– Colin Fine
11 hours ago
The only (barely) common use of "remove" this way is in genealogy. Cousins are said to be so many times "removed" from each other. Each "remov[al]" means their common ancestor is from one more generation previous.
– K.A
5 hours ago
@K.A: yes, but what is used in that case is the participle/adjective "removed", not the noun "remove".
– Colin Fine
5 hours ago
@ColinFine: I can't edit my comment, but I should have written that it is the same idea of "remov[...]" meaning metaphoric and not literal quantified separation distance.
– K.A
3 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
Further to Colin's good answer, consider how the police sketch artists use descriptions provided by witnesses to create the likeness of a suspect, so that they can send out an All Points Bulletin.
Such sketches are at least at one remove from the suspect. They are not a photograph but a drawing based on someone's description.
Now, if for some reason police headquarters does not have the ability to transmit the sketch to a patrol car but must describe the sketch to a police officer over the radio, that verbal description will be at two removes from the suspect:
"A heavy-set bald Caucasian male in his mid forties with a Fu-Manchu mustache, a large amethyst earring in his left ear, and one gold front tooth."
The "remove" or "step" is not an actual physical distance but a logical or conceptual "distance" away from the original. As Colin says, "notional".
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "481"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f191419%2fmeaning-of-is-at-two-removes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Yes, "remove" is a noun here, but it is obsolete except in a few special senses, and in this idiom: "at two removes" means "taking two (logical, or notional) steps away from something" - in this case, from the Platonic ideal, to the bed, to the image of a bed.
Many thanks. Do you mean: the bedposts of bed are in two step away from eachother or the bedpost is in two step away from something else which we don't know what it is? and Do you know the meaning of "still-rooted"
– Viser Hashemi
11 hours ago
5
It has nothing whatever to do with the bedposts, @ViserHashemi: it's talking about the conceptual separation from the ideal to the bed, and from the bed to an image of a bed.
– Colin Fine
11 hours ago
The only (barely) common use of "remove" this way is in genealogy. Cousins are said to be so many times "removed" from each other. Each "remov[al]" means their common ancestor is from one more generation previous.
– K.A
5 hours ago
@K.A: yes, but what is used in that case is the participle/adjective "removed", not the noun "remove".
– Colin Fine
5 hours ago
@ColinFine: I can't edit my comment, but I should have written that it is the same idea of "remov[...]" meaning metaphoric and not literal quantified separation distance.
– K.A
3 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
Yes, "remove" is a noun here, but it is obsolete except in a few special senses, and in this idiom: "at two removes" means "taking two (logical, or notional) steps away from something" - in this case, from the Platonic ideal, to the bed, to the image of a bed.
Many thanks. Do you mean: the bedposts of bed are in two step away from eachother or the bedpost is in two step away from something else which we don't know what it is? and Do you know the meaning of "still-rooted"
– Viser Hashemi
11 hours ago
5
It has nothing whatever to do with the bedposts, @ViserHashemi: it's talking about the conceptual separation from the ideal to the bed, and from the bed to an image of a bed.
– Colin Fine
11 hours ago
The only (barely) common use of "remove" this way is in genealogy. Cousins are said to be so many times "removed" from each other. Each "remov[al]" means their common ancestor is from one more generation previous.
– K.A
5 hours ago
@K.A: yes, but what is used in that case is the participle/adjective "removed", not the noun "remove".
– Colin Fine
5 hours ago
@ColinFine: I can't edit my comment, but I should have written that it is the same idea of "remov[...]" meaning metaphoric and not literal quantified separation distance.
– K.A
3 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
Yes, "remove" is a noun here, but it is obsolete except in a few special senses, and in this idiom: "at two removes" means "taking two (logical, or notional) steps away from something" - in this case, from the Platonic ideal, to the bed, to the image of a bed.
Yes, "remove" is a noun here, but it is obsolete except in a few special senses, and in this idiom: "at two removes" means "taking two (logical, or notional) steps away from something" - in this case, from the Platonic ideal, to the bed, to the image of a bed.
answered 12 hours ago
Colin Fine
28.3k24155
28.3k24155
Many thanks. Do you mean: the bedposts of bed are in two step away from eachother or the bedpost is in two step away from something else which we don't know what it is? and Do you know the meaning of "still-rooted"
– Viser Hashemi
11 hours ago
5
It has nothing whatever to do with the bedposts, @ViserHashemi: it's talking about the conceptual separation from the ideal to the bed, and from the bed to an image of a bed.
– Colin Fine
11 hours ago
The only (barely) common use of "remove" this way is in genealogy. Cousins are said to be so many times "removed" from each other. Each "remov[al]" means their common ancestor is from one more generation previous.
– K.A
5 hours ago
@K.A: yes, but what is used in that case is the participle/adjective "removed", not the noun "remove".
– Colin Fine
5 hours ago
@ColinFine: I can't edit my comment, but I should have written that it is the same idea of "remov[...]" meaning metaphoric and not literal quantified separation distance.
– K.A
3 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
Many thanks. Do you mean: the bedposts of bed are in two step away from eachother or the bedpost is in two step away from something else which we don't know what it is? and Do you know the meaning of "still-rooted"
– Viser Hashemi
11 hours ago
5
It has nothing whatever to do with the bedposts, @ViserHashemi: it's talking about the conceptual separation from the ideal to the bed, and from the bed to an image of a bed.
– Colin Fine
11 hours ago
The only (barely) common use of "remove" this way is in genealogy. Cousins are said to be so many times "removed" from each other. Each "remov[al]" means their common ancestor is from one more generation previous.
– K.A
5 hours ago
@K.A: yes, but what is used in that case is the participle/adjective "removed", not the noun "remove".
– Colin Fine
5 hours ago
@ColinFine: I can't edit my comment, but I should have written that it is the same idea of "remov[...]" meaning metaphoric and not literal quantified separation distance.
– K.A
3 hours ago
Many thanks. Do you mean: the bedposts of bed are in two step away from eachother or the bedpost is in two step away from something else which we don't know what it is? and Do you know the meaning of "still-rooted"
– Viser Hashemi
11 hours ago
Many thanks. Do you mean: the bedposts of bed are in two step away from eachother or the bedpost is in two step away from something else which we don't know what it is? and Do you know the meaning of "still-rooted"
– Viser Hashemi
11 hours ago
5
5
It has nothing whatever to do with the bedposts, @ViserHashemi: it's talking about the conceptual separation from the ideal to the bed, and from the bed to an image of a bed.
– Colin Fine
11 hours ago
It has nothing whatever to do with the bedposts, @ViserHashemi: it's talking about the conceptual separation from the ideal to the bed, and from the bed to an image of a bed.
– Colin Fine
11 hours ago
The only (barely) common use of "remove" this way is in genealogy. Cousins are said to be so many times "removed" from each other. Each "remov[al]" means their common ancestor is from one more generation previous.
– K.A
5 hours ago
The only (barely) common use of "remove" this way is in genealogy. Cousins are said to be so many times "removed" from each other. Each "remov[al]" means their common ancestor is from one more generation previous.
– K.A
5 hours ago
@K.A: yes, but what is used in that case is the participle/adjective "removed", not the noun "remove".
– Colin Fine
5 hours ago
@K.A: yes, but what is used in that case is the participle/adjective "removed", not the noun "remove".
– Colin Fine
5 hours ago
@ColinFine: I can't edit my comment, but I should have written that it is the same idea of "remov[...]" meaning metaphoric and not literal quantified separation distance.
– K.A
3 hours ago
@ColinFine: I can't edit my comment, but I should have written that it is the same idea of "remov[...]" meaning metaphoric and not literal quantified separation distance.
– K.A
3 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
Further to Colin's good answer, consider how the police sketch artists use descriptions provided by witnesses to create the likeness of a suspect, so that they can send out an All Points Bulletin.
Such sketches are at least at one remove from the suspect. They are not a photograph but a drawing based on someone's description.
Now, if for some reason police headquarters does not have the ability to transmit the sketch to a patrol car but must describe the sketch to a police officer over the radio, that verbal description will be at two removes from the suspect:
"A heavy-set bald Caucasian male in his mid forties with a Fu-Manchu mustache, a large amethyst earring in his left ear, and one gold front tooth."
The "remove" or "step" is not an actual physical distance but a logical or conceptual "distance" away from the original. As Colin says, "notional".
add a comment |
Further to Colin's good answer, consider how the police sketch artists use descriptions provided by witnesses to create the likeness of a suspect, so that they can send out an All Points Bulletin.
Such sketches are at least at one remove from the suspect. They are not a photograph but a drawing based on someone's description.
Now, if for some reason police headquarters does not have the ability to transmit the sketch to a patrol car but must describe the sketch to a police officer over the radio, that verbal description will be at two removes from the suspect:
"A heavy-set bald Caucasian male in his mid forties with a Fu-Manchu mustache, a large amethyst earring in his left ear, and one gold front tooth."
The "remove" or "step" is not an actual physical distance but a logical or conceptual "distance" away from the original. As Colin says, "notional".
add a comment |
Further to Colin's good answer, consider how the police sketch artists use descriptions provided by witnesses to create the likeness of a suspect, so that they can send out an All Points Bulletin.
Such sketches are at least at one remove from the suspect. They are not a photograph but a drawing based on someone's description.
Now, if for some reason police headquarters does not have the ability to transmit the sketch to a patrol car but must describe the sketch to a police officer over the radio, that verbal description will be at two removes from the suspect:
"A heavy-set bald Caucasian male in his mid forties with a Fu-Manchu mustache, a large amethyst earring in his left ear, and one gold front tooth."
The "remove" or "step" is not an actual physical distance but a logical or conceptual "distance" away from the original. As Colin says, "notional".
Further to Colin's good answer, consider how the police sketch artists use descriptions provided by witnesses to create the likeness of a suspect, so that they can send out an All Points Bulletin.
Such sketches are at least at one remove from the suspect. They are not a photograph but a drawing based on someone's description.
Now, if for some reason police headquarters does not have the ability to transmit the sketch to a patrol car but must describe the sketch to a police officer over the radio, that verbal description will be at two removes from the suspect:
"A heavy-set bald Caucasian male in his mid forties with a Fu-Manchu mustache, a large amethyst earring in his left ear, and one gold front tooth."
The "remove" or "step" is not an actual physical distance but a logical or conceptual "distance" away from the original. As Colin says, "notional".
edited 11 hours ago
answered 11 hours ago
Tᴚoɯɐuo
108k682174
108k682174
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f191419%2fmeaning-of-is-at-two-removes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
Think of it as "two degrees of separation."
– Jason Bassford
11 hours ago