Method of undetermined coefficients clarification
For $$ddot{x}+x=epsilon$$ I found that $x(t)=c_1sin(t)+c_2cos(t)$. Next for method of undetermined coefficients we have begin{align*}
x&=At^2+Bt+C\
dot{x}&=2At+B\
ddot{x}&=2A.
end{align*} According to my solutions manual for $ddot{x}+x=epsilon$ we have $2A+At^2+Bt+C=epsilon$ or $x=epsilon$. My question is how did we just confirm that $x=epsilon$ in this case? I don't see how we made that conclusion.
differential-equations
add a comment |
For $$ddot{x}+x=epsilon$$ I found that $x(t)=c_1sin(t)+c_2cos(t)$. Next for method of undetermined coefficients we have begin{align*}
x&=At^2+Bt+C\
dot{x}&=2At+B\
ddot{x}&=2A.
end{align*} According to my solutions manual for $ddot{x}+x=epsilon$ we have $2A+At^2+Bt+C=epsilon$ or $x=epsilon$. My question is how did we just confirm that $x=epsilon$ in this case? I don't see how we made that conclusion.
differential-equations
add a comment |
For $$ddot{x}+x=epsilon$$ I found that $x(t)=c_1sin(t)+c_2cos(t)$. Next for method of undetermined coefficients we have begin{align*}
x&=At^2+Bt+C\
dot{x}&=2At+B\
ddot{x}&=2A.
end{align*} According to my solutions manual for $ddot{x}+x=epsilon$ we have $2A+At^2+Bt+C=epsilon$ or $x=epsilon$. My question is how did we just confirm that $x=epsilon$ in this case? I don't see how we made that conclusion.
differential-equations
For $$ddot{x}+x=epsilon$$ I found that $x(t)=c_1sin(t)+c_2cos(t)$. Next for method of undetermined coefficients we have begin{align*}
x&=At^2+Bt+C\
dot{x}&=2At+B\
ddot{x}&=2A.
end{align*} According to my solutions manual for $ddot{x}+x=epsilon$ we have $2A+At^2+Bt+C=epsilon$ or $x=epsilon$. My question is how did we just confirm that $x=epsilon$ in this case? I don't see how we made that conclusion.
differential-equations
differential-equations
asked Nov 26 '18 at 19:29
Peetrius
404111
404111
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
You can identify polynomials by the coefficient before each degree. For example here
$A=0$ because there's no term in $t^2$, and $B=0$ because there's no term in $t$. However
$$
2A+C= epsilon
$$
But with $A=0$ we have
$C= epsilon$. Replacing
$$
x=At^2+Bt+C=0+0+epsilon
$$
add a comment |
Substituting the polynomial yielded, you can see by equating coefficients, that $x=epsilon$ :
$$ddot{At^2 + Bt + C} + At^2 + Bt + C = epsilon Rightarrow begin{cases} A=0 \ B = 0 \C=epsilonend{cases}$$
Plugging in $x=epsilon$ if $epsilon$ is a constant in your equation, you simply get that
$$ddot{epsilon}+epsilon= 0 + epsilon = epsilon$$
thus your initial differential equation is true and $x=epsilon$ is indeed a solution.
add a comment |
Your right side is $ϵe^{0cdot t}$ and as $0$ is not a root of the characteristic polynomial $0=lambda^2+1$ of the left side, the method of undetermined coefficients tells you that the polynomial factor of the particular solution has the same degree $0$ with no extra factors $t$, so $x_p(t)=Ae^{0cdot t}=A$. Inserting into the ODE gives $A=ϵ$, thus $x_p(t)=ϵ$.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3014802%2fmethod-of-undetermined-coefficients-clarification%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You can identify polynomials by the coefficient before each degree. For example here
$A=0$ because there's no term in $t^2$, and $B=0$ because there's no term in $t$. However
$$
2A+C= epsilon
$$
But with $A=0$ we have
$C= epsilon$. Replacing
$$
x=At^2+Bt+C=0+0+epsilon
$$
add a comment |
You can identify polynomials by the coefficient before each degree. For example here
$A=0$ because there's no term in $t^2$, and $B=0$ because there's no term in $t$. However
$$
2A+C= epsilon
$$
But with $A=0$ we have
$C= epsilon$. Replacing
$$
x=At^2+Bt+C=0+0+epsilon
$$
add a comment |
You can identify polynomials by the coefficient before each degree. For example here
$A=0$ because there's no term in $t^2$, and $B=0$ because there's no term in $t$. However
$$
2A+C= epsilon
$$
But with $A=0$ we have
$C= epsilon$. Replacing
$$
x=At^2+Bt+C=0+0+epsilon
$$
You can identify polynomials by the coefficient before each degree. For example here
$A=0$ because there's no term in $t^2$, and $B=0$ because there's no term in $t$. However
$$
2A+C= epsilon
$$
But with $A=0$ we have
$C= epsilon$. Replacing
$$
x=At^2+Bt+C=0+0+epsilon
$$
answered Nov 26 '18 at 19:41
Atmos
4,742319
4,742319
add a comment |
add a comment |
Substituting the polynomial yielded, you can see by equating coefficients, that $x=epsilon$ :
$$ddot{At^2 + Bt + C} + At^2 + Bt + C = epsilon Rightarrow begin{cases} A=0 \ B = 0 \C=epsilonend{cases}$$
Plugging in $x=epsilon$ if $epsilon$ is a constant in your equation, you simply get that
$$ddot{epsilon}+epsilon= 0 + epsilon = epsilon$$
thus your initial differential equation is true and $x=epsilon$ is indeed a solution.
add a comment |
Substituting the polynomial yielded, you can see by equating coefficients, that $x=epsilon$ :
$$ddot{At^2 + Bt + C} + At^2 + Bt + C = epsilon Rightarrow begin{cases} A=0 \ B = 0 \C=epsilonend{cases}$$
Plugging in $x=epsilon$ if $epsilon$ is a constant in your equation, you simply get that
$$ddot{epsilon}+epsilon= 0 + epsilon = epsilon$$
thus your initial differential equation is true and $x=epsilon$ is indeed a solution.
add a comment |
Substituting the polynomial yielded, you can see by equating coefficients, that $x=epsilon$ :
$$ddot{At^2 + Bt + C} + At^2 + Bt + C = epsilon Rightarrow begin{cases} A=0 \ B = 0 \C=epsilonend{cases}$$
Plugging in $x=epsilon$ if $epsilon$ is a constant in your equation, you simply get that
$$ddot{epsilon}+epsilon= 0 + epsilon = epsilon$$
thus your initial differential equation is true and $x=epsilon$ is indeed a solution.
Substituting the polynomial yielded, you can see by equating coefficients, that $x=epsilon$ :
$$ddot{At^2 + Bt + C} + At^2 + Bt + C = epsilon Rightarrow begin{cases} A=0 \ B = 0 \C=epsilonend{cases}$$
Plugging in $x=epsilon$ if $epsilon$ is a constant in your equation, you simply get that
$$ddot{epsilon}+epsilon= 0 + epsilon = epsilon$$
thus your initial differential equation is true and $x=epsilon$ is indeed a solution.
answered Nov 26 '18 at 19:40
Rebellos
14.4k31245
14.4k31245
add a comment |
add a comment |
Your right side is $ϵe^{0cdot t}$ and as $0$ is not a root of the characteristic polynomial $0=lambda^2+1$ of the left side, the method of undetermined coefficients tells you that the polynomial factor of the particular solution has the same degree $0$ with no extra factors $t$, so $x_p(t)=Ae^{0cdot t}=A$. Inserting into the ODE gives $A=ϵ$, thus $x_p(t)=ϵ$.
add a comment |
Your right side is $ϵe^{0cdot t}$ and as $0$ is not a root of the characteristic polynomial $0=lambda^2+1$ of the left side, the method of undetermined coefficients tells you that the polynomial factor of the particular solution has the same degree $0$ with no extra factors $t$, so $x_p(t)=Ae^{0cdot t}=A$. Inserting into the ODE gives $A=ϵ$, thus $x_p(t)=ϵ$.
add a comment |
Your right side is $ϵe^{0cdot t}$ and as $0$ is not a root of the characteristic polynomial $0=lambda^2+1$ of the left side, the method of undetermined coefficients tells you that the polynomial factor of the particular solution has the same degree $0$ with no extra factors $t$, so $x_p(t)=Ae^{0cdot t}=A$. Inserting into the ODE gives $A=ϵ$, thus $x_p(t)=ϵ$.
Your right side is $ϵe^{0cdot t}$ and as $0$ is not a root of the characteristic polynomial $0=lambda^2+1$ of the left side, the method of undetermined coefficients tells you that the polynomial factor of the particular solution has the same degree $0$ with no extra factors $t$, so $x_p(t)=Ae^{0cdot t}=A$. Inserting into the ODE gives $A=ϵ$, thus $x_p(t)=ϵ$.
answered Nov 26 '18 at 20:52
LutzL
56k42054
56k42054
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3014802%2fmethod-of-undetermined-coefficients-clarification%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown