Singular $n$-simplex, unknown notation, homology
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I would like to know what is denoted in the singular simplices paragraph by $e_0,...,e_n$ here:
$$[p_0,p_1,...,p_n]=[sigma(e_0),...,sigma(e_n)]$$ ?
How this matches with simplicial identities $d_i$ and $s_i$ ?
continuity simplex
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I would like to know what is denoted in the singular simplices paragraph by $e_0,...,e_n$ here:
$$[p_0,p_1,...,p_n]=[sigma(e_0),...,sigma(e_n)]$$ ?
How this matches with simplicial identities $d_i$ and $s_i$ ?
continuity simplex
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I would like to know what is denoted in the singular simplices paragraph by $e_0,...,e_n$ here:
$$[p_0,p_1,...,p_n]=[sigma(e_0),...,sigma(e_n)]$$ ?
How this matches with simplicial identities $d_i$ and $s_i$ ?
continuity simplex
I would like to know what is denoted in the singular simplices paragraph by $e_0,...,e_n$ here:
$$[p_0,p_1,...,p_n]=[sigma(e_0),...,sigma(e_n)]$$ ?
How this matches with simplicial identities $d_i$ and $s_i$ ?
continuity simplex
continuity simplex
edited Nov 22 at 10:42
user302797
19.4k92252
19.4k92252
asked Nov 21 at 12:50
user122424
1,0551616
1,0551616
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
$Delta^n$ is the standard $n$-simplex in $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$, i.e. the convex hull of the $n+1$ elements $e_0,dots,e_n$ forming the standard basis of $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$ ($e_k = (delta_{k0},dots,delta_{kn})$ with $delta_{kk} = 1$ and $delta_{kj} = 0$ for $k ne j$).
If $sigma : Delta^n to X$ is a singular $n$-simplex, then the $p_i = sigma(e_i)$ are (not necessarily distint) points of $X$. Hence the collection $[p_0,dots,p_n]$ is not a complete description of $sigma$, but only a symbolic notation. Defining
$$partial sigma = sum_{k=0}^n (-1)^k [p_0,dots,p_{k-1},p_{k+1},dots,p_n]$$
is therefore also only symbolic. In fact, $[p_0,dots,p_{k-1},p_{k+1},dots,p_n]$ denotes the $(n-1)$-simplex $partial_k sigma : Delta^{n-1} to X$ (the $k$-face of $sigma$) defined by
$$partial_k sigma = sigma circ s_k ,$$
where $s_k : Delta^{n-1} to Delta^n$ is the restriction of the linear map determined by $s_k(e_j) = e_j$ for $j < k$, $s_k(e_j) = e_{j+1}$ for $j ge k$. This map embeds $Delta^{n-1}$ as the $k$-th face of $Delta^n$, i.e. the convex hull of $e_0,dots,e_{k-1},e_{k+1},dots,e_n$.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
The point $e_i$ is just
$$
e_i=begin{pmatrix}
0\
vdots\
0\
1\
0\
vdots\
0
end{pmatrix}inmathbb R^{n+1}
$$
with the entry $1$ in the $i$-th row. These points are exactly the vertices of the $n$-simplex $Delta_n$.
Given this, you can compute that the $d_i$ and $s_i$ satisfy indeed the simplicial identities.
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
$Delta^n$ is the standard $n$-simplex in $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$, i.e. the convex hull of the $n+1$ elements $e_0,dots,e_n$ forming the standard basis of $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$ ($e_k = (delta_{k0},dots,delta_{kn})$ with $delta_{kk} = 1$ and $delta_{kj} = 0$ for $k ne j$).
If $sigma : Delta^n to X$ is a singular $n$-simplex, then the $p_i = sigma(e_i)$ are (not necessarily distint) points of $X$. Hence the collection $[p_0,dots,p_n]$ is not a complete description of $sigma$, but only a symbolic notation. Defining
$$partial sigma = sum_{k=0}^n (-1)^k [p_0,dots,p_{k-1},p_{k+1},dots,p_n]$$
is therefore also only symbolic. In fact, $[p_0,dots,p_{k-1},p_{k+1},dots,p_n]$ denotes the $(n-1)$-simplex $partial_k sigma : Delta^{n-1} to X$ (the $k$-face of $sigma$) defined by
$$partial_k sigma = sigma circ s_k ,$$
where $s_k : Delta^{n-1} to Delta^n$ is the restriction of the linear map determined by $s_k(e_j) = e_j$ for $j < k$, $s_k(e_j) = e_{j+1}$ for $j ge k$. This map embeds $Delta^{n-1}$ as the $k$-th face of $Delta^n$, i.e. the convex hull of $e_0,dots,e_{k-1},e_{k+1},dots,e_n$.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
$Delta^n$ is the standard $n$-simplex in $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$, i.e. the convex hull of the $n+1$ elements $e_0,dots,e_n$ forming the standard basis of $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$ ($e_k = (delta_{k0},dots,delta_{kn})$ with $delta_{kk} = 1$ and $delta_{kj} = 0$ for $k ne j$).
If $sigma : Delta^n to X$ is a singular $n$-simplex, then the $p_i = sigma(e_i)$ are (not necessarily distint) points of $X$. Hence the collection $[p_0,dots,p_n]$ is not a complete description of $sigma$, but only a symbolic notation. Defining
$$partial sigma = sum_{k=0}^n (-1)^k [p_0,dots,p_{k-1},p_{k+1},dots,p_n]$$
is therefore also only symbolic. In fact, $[p_0,dots,p_{k-1},p_{k+1},dots,p_n]$ denotes the $(n-1)$-simplex $partial_k sigma : Delta^{n-1} to X$ (the $k$-face of $sigma$) defined by
$$partial_k sigma = sigma circ s_k ,$$
where $s_k : Delta^{n-1} to Delta^n$ is the restriction of the linear map determined by $s_k(e_j) = e_j$ for $j < k$, $s_k(e_j) = e_{j+1}$ for $j ge k$. This map embeds $Delta^{n-1}$ as the $k$-th face of $Delta^n$, i.e. the convex hull of $e_0,dots,e_{k-1},e_{k+1},dots,e_n$.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
$Delta^n$ is the standard $n$-simplex in $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$, i.e. the convex hull of the $n+1$ elements $e_0,dots,e_n$ forming the standard basis of $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$ ($e_k = (delta_{k0},dots,delta_{kn})$ with $delta_{kk} = 1$ and $delta_{kj} = 0$ for $k ne j$).
If $sigma : Delta^n to X$ is a singular $n$-simplex, then the $p_i = sigma(e_i)$ are (not necessarily distint) points of $X$. Hence the collection $[p_0,dots,p_n]$ is not a complete description of $sigma$, but only a symbolic notation. Defining
$$partial sigma = sum_{k=0}^n (-1)^k [p_0,dots,p_{k-1},p_{k+1},dots,p_n]$$
is therefore also only symbolic. In fact, $[p_0,dots,p_{k-1},p_{k+1},dots,p_n]$ denotes the $(n-1)$-simplex $partial_k sigma : Delta^{n-1} to X$ (the $k$-face of $sigma$) defined by
$$partial_k sigma = sigma circ s_k ,$$
where $s_k : Delta^{n-1} to Delta^n$ is the restriction of the linear map determined by $s_k(e_j) = e_j$ for $j < k$, $s_k(e_j) = e_{j+1}$ for $j ge k$. This map embeds $Delta^{n-1}$ as the $k$-th face of $Delta^n$, i.e. the convex hull of $e_0,dots,e_{k-1},e_{k+1},dots,e_n$.
$Delta^n$ is the standard $n$-simplex in $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$, i.e. the convex hull of the $n+1$ elements $e_0,dots,e_n$ forming the standard basis of $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$ ($e_k = (delta_{k0},dots,delta_{kn})$ with $delta_{kk} = 1$ and $delta_{kj} = 0$ for $k ne j$).
If $sigma : Delta^n to X$ is a singular $n$-simplex, then the $p_i = sigma(e_i)$ are (not necessarily distint) points of $X$. Hence the collection $[p_0,dots,p_n]$ is not a complete description of $sigma$, but only a symbolic notation. Defining
$$partial sigma = sum_{k=0}^n (-1)^k [p_0,dots,p_{k-1},p_{k+1},dots,p_n]$$
is therefore also only symbolic. In fact, $[p_0,dots,p_{k-1},p_{k+1},dots,p_n]$ denotes the $(n-1)$-simplex $partial_k sigma : Delta^{n-1} to X$ (the $k$-face of $sigma$) defined by
$$partial_k sigma = sigma circ s_k ,$$
where $s_k : Delta^{n-1} to Delta^n$ is the restriction of the linear map determined by $s_k(e_j) = e_j$ for $j < k$, $s_k(e_j) = e_{j+1}$ for $j ge k$. This map embeds $Delta^{n-1}$ as the $k$-th face of $Delta^n$, i.e. the convex hull of $e_0,dots,e_{k-1},e_{k+1},dots,e_n$.
answered Nov 21 at 14:02
Paul Frost
8,3921528
8,3921528
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
The point $e_i$ is just
$$
e_i=begin{pmatrix}
0\
vdots\
0\
1\
0\
vdots\
0
end{pmatrix}inmathbb R^{n+1}
$$
with the entry $1$ in the $i$-th row. These points are exactly the vertices of the $n$-simplex $Delta_n$.
Given this, you can compute that the $d_i$ and $s_i$ satisfy indeed the simplicial identities.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
The point $e_i$ is just
$$
e_i=begin{pmatrix}
0\
vdots\
0\
1\
0\
vdots\
0
end{pmatrix}inmathbb R^{n+1}
$$
with the entry $1$ in the $i$-th row. These points are exactly the vertices of the $n$-simplex $Delta_n$.
Given this, you can compute that the $d_i$ and $s_i$ satisfy indeed the simplicial identities.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
The point $e_i$ is just
$$
e_i=begin{pmatrix}
0\
vdots\
0\
1\
0\
vdots\
0
end{pmatrix}inmathbb R^{n+1}
$$
with the entry $1$ in the $i$-th row. These points are exactly the vertices of the $n$-simplex $Delta_n$.
Given this, you can compute that the $d_i$ and $s_i$ satisfy indeed the simplicial identities.
The point $e_i$ is just
$$
e_i=begin{pmatrix}
0\
vdots\
0\
1\
0\
vdots\
0
end{pmatrix}inmathbb R^{n+1}
$$
with the entry $1$ in the $i$-th row. These points are exactly the vertices of the $n$-simplex $Delta_n$.
Given this, you can compute that the $d_i$ and $s_i$ satisfy indeed the simplicial identities.
answered Nov 21 at 13:38
Fumera
235
235
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3007689%2fsingular-n-simplex-unknown-notation-homology%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown