Singular $n$-simplex, unknown notation, homology











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I would like to know what is denoted in the singular simplices paragraph by $e_0,...,e_n$ here:



$$[p_0,p_1,...,p_n]=[sigma(e_0),...,sigma(e_n)]$$ ?



How this matches with simplicial identities $d_i$ and $s_i$ ?










share|cite|improve this question




























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    I would like to know what is denoted in the singular simplices paragraph by $e_0,...,e_n$ here:



    $$[p_0,p_1,...,p_n]=[sigma(e_0),...,sigma(e_n)]$$ ?



    How this matches with simplicial identities $d_i$ and $s_i$ ?










    share|cite|improve this question


























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      I would like to know what is denoted in the singular simplices paragraph by $e_0,...,e_n$ here:



      $$[p_0,p_1,...,p_n]=[sigma(e_0),...,sigma(e_n)]$$ ?



      How this matches with simplicial identities $d_i$ and $s_i$ ?










      share|cite|improve this question















      I would like to know what is denoted in the singular simplices paragraph by $e_0,...,e_n$ here:



      $$[p_0,p_1,...,p_n]=[sigma(e_0),...,sigma(e_n)]$$ ?



      How this matches with simplicial identities $d_i$ and $s_i$ ?







      continuity simplex






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 22 at 10:42









      user302797

      19.4k92252




      19.4k92252










      asked Nov 21 at 12:50









      user122424

      1,0551616




      1,0551616






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          $Delta^n$ is the standard $n$-simplex in $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$, i.e. the convex hull of the $n+1$ elements $e_0,dots,e_n$ forming the standard basis of $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$ ($e_k = (delta_{k0},dots,delta_{kn})$ with $delta_{kk} = 1$ and $delta_{kj} = 0$ for $k ne j$).



          If $sigma : Delta^n to X$ is a singular $n$-simplex, then the $p_i = sigma(e_i)$ are (not necessarily distint) points of $X$. Hence the collection $[p_0,dots,p_n]$ is not a complete description of $sigma$, but only a symbolic notation. Defining
          $$partial sigma = sum_{k=0}^n (-1)^k [p_0,dots,p_{k-1},p_{k+1},dots,p_n]$$
          is therefore also only symbolic. In fact, $[p_0,dots,p_{k-1},p_{k+1},dots,p_n]$ denotes the $(n-1)$-simplex $partial_k sigma : Delta^{n-1} to X$ (the $k$-face of $sigma$) defined by
          $$partial_k sigma = sigma circ s_k ,$$
          where $s_k : Delta^{n-1} to Delta^n$ is the restriction of the linear map determined by $s_k(e_j) = e_j$ for $j < k$, $s_k(e_j) = e_{j+1}$ for $j ge k$. This map embeds $Delta^{n-1}$ as the $k$-th face of $Delta^n$, i.e. the convex hull of $e_0,dots,e_{k-1},e_{k+1},dots,e_n$.






          share|cite|improve this answer




























            up vote
            0
            down vote













            The point $e_i$ is just
            $$
            e_i=begin{pmatrix}
            0\
            vdots\
            0\
            1\
            0\
            vdots\
            0
            end{pmatrix}inmathbb R^{n+1}
            $$

            with the entry $1$ in the $i$-th row. These points are exactly the vertices of the $n$-simplex $Delta_n$.



            Given this, you can compute that the $d_i$ and $s_i$ satisfy indeed the simplicial identities.






            share|cite|improve this answer





















              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3007689%2fsingular-n-simplex-unknown-notation-homology%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes








              up vote
              1
              down vote



              accepted










              $Delta^n$ is the standard $n$-simplex in $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$, i.e. the convex hull of the $n+1$ elements $e_0,dots,e_n$ forming the standard basis of $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$ ($e_k = (delta_{k0},dots,delta_{kn})$ with $delta_{kk} = 1$ and $delta_{kj} = 0$ for $k ne j$).



              If $sigma : Delta^n to X$ is a singular $n$-simplex, then the $p_i = sigma(e_i)$ are (not necessarily distint) points of $X$. Hence the collection $[p_0,dots,p_n]$ is not a complete description of $sigma$, but only a symbolic notation. Defining
              $$partial sigma = sum_{k=0}^n (-1)^k [p_0,dots,p_{k-1},p_{k+1},dots,p_n]$$
              is therefore also only symbolic. In fact, $[p_0,dots,p_{k-1},p_{k+1},dots,p_n]$ denotes the $(n-1)$-simplex $partial_k sigma : Delta^{n-1} to X$ (the $k$-face of $sigma$) defined by
              $$partial_k sigma = sigma circ s_k ,$$
              where $s_k : Delta^{n-1} to Delta^n$ is the restriction of the linear map determined by $s_k(e_j) = e_j$ for $j < k$, $s_k(e_j) = e_{j+1}$ for $j ge k$. This map embeds $Delta^{n-1}$ as the $k$-th face of $Delta^n$, i.e. the convex hull of $e_0,dots,e_{k-1},e_{k+1},dots,e_n$.






              share|cite|improve this answer

























                up vote
                1
                down vote



                accepted










                $Delta^n$ is the standard $n$-simplex in $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$, i.e. the convex hull of the $n+1$ elements $e_0,dots,e_n$ forming the standard basis of $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$ ($e_k = (delta_{k0},dots,delta_{kn})$ with $delta_{kk} = 1$ and $delta_{kj} = 0$ for $k ne j$).



                If $sigma : Delta^n to X$ is a singular $n$-simplex, then the $p_i = sigma(e_i)$ are (not necessarily distint) points of $X$. Hence the collection $[p_0,dots,p_n]$ is not a complete description of $sigma$, but only a symbolic notation. Defining
                $$partial sigma = sum_{k=0}^n (-1)^k [p_0,dots,p_{k-1},p_{k+1},dots,p_n]$$
                is therefore also only symbolic. In fact, $[p_0,dots,p_{k-1},p_{k+1},dots,p_n]$ denotes the $(n-1)$-simplex $partial_k sigma : Delta^{n-1} to X$ (the $k$-face of $sigma$) defined by
                $$partial_k sigma = sigma circ s_k ,$$
                where $s_k : Delta^{n-1} to Delta^n$ is the restriction of the linear map determined by $s_k(e_j) = e_j$ for $j < k$, $s_k(e_j) = e_{j+1}$ for $j ge k$. This map embeds $Delta^{n-1}$ as the $k$-th face of $Delta^n$, i.e. the convex hull of $e_0,dots,e_{k-1},e_{k+1},dots,e_n$.






                share|cite|improve this answer























                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote



                  accepted







                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote



                  accepted






                  $Delta^n$ is the standard $n$-simplex in $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$, i.e. the convex hull of the $n+1$ elements $e_0,dots,e_n$ forming the standard basis of $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$ ($e_k = (delta_{k0},dots,delta_{kn})$ with $delta_{kk} = 1$ and $delta_{kj} = 0$ for $k ne j$).



                  If $sigma : Delta^n to X$ is a singular $n$-simplex, then the $p_i = sigma(e_i)$ are (not necessarily distint) points of $X$. Hence the collection $[p_0,dots,p_n]$ is not a complete description of $sigma$, but only a symbolic notation. Defining
                  $$partial sigma = sum_{k=0}^n (-1)^k [p_0,dots,p_{k-1},p_{k+1},dots,p_n]$$
                  is therefore also only symbolic. In fact, $[p_0,dots,p_{k-1},p_{k+1},dots,p_n]$ denotes the $(n-1)$-simplex $partial_k sigma : Delta^{n-1} to X$ (the $k$-face of $sigma$) defined by
                  $$partial_k sigma = sigma circ s_k ,$$
                  where $s_k : Delta^{n-1} to Delta^n$ is the restriction of the linear map determined by $s_k(e_j) = e_j$ for $j < k$, $s_k(e_j) = e_{j+1}$ for $j ge k$. This map embeds $Delta^{n-1}$ as the $k$-th face of $Delta^n$, i.e. the convex hull of $e_0,dots,e_{k-1},e_{k+1},dots,e_n$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  $Delta^n$ is the standard $n$-simplex in $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$, i.e. the convex hull of the $n+1$ elements $e_0,dots,e_n$ forming the standard basis of $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$ ($e_k = (delta_{k0},dots,delta_{kn})$ with $delta_{kk} = 1$ and $delta_{kj} = 0$ for $k ne j$).



                  If $sigma : Delta^n to X$ is a singular $n$-simplex, then the $p_i = sigma(e_i)$ are (not necessarily distint) points of $X$. Hence the collection $[p_0,dots,p_n]$ is not a complete description of $sigma$, but only a symbolic notation. Defining
                  $$partial sigma = sum_{k=0}^n (-1)^k [p_0,dots,p_{k-1},p_{k+1},dots,p_n]$$
                  is therefore also only symbolic. In fact, $[p_0,dots,p_{k-1},p_{k+1},dots,p_n]$ denotes the $(n-1)$-simplex $partial_k sigma : Delta^{n-1} to X$ (the $k$-face of $sigma$) defined by
                  $$partial_k sigma = sigma circ s_k ,$$
                  where $s_k : Delta^{n-1} to Delta^n$ is the restriction of the linear map determined by $s_k(e_j) = e_j$ for $j < k$, $s_k(e_j) = e_{j+1}$ for $j ge k$. This map embeds $Delta^{n-1}$ as the $k$-th face of $Delta^n$, i.e. the convex hull of $e_0,dots,e_{k-1},e_{k+1},dots,e_n$.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Nov 21 at 14:02









                  Paul Frost

                  8,3921528




                  8,3921528






















                      up vote
                      0
                      down vote













                      The point $e_i$ is just
                      $$
                      e_i=begin{pmatrix}
                      0\
                      vdots\
                      0\
                      1\
                      0\
                      vdots\
                      0
                      end{pmatrix}inmathbb R^{n+1}
                      $$

                      with the entry $1$ in the $i$-th row. These points are exactly the vertices of the $n$-simplex $Delta_n$.



                      Given this, you can compute that the $d_i$ and $s_i$ satisfy indeed the simplicial identities.






                      share|cite|improve this answer

























                        up vote
                        0
                        down vote













                        The point $e_i$ is just
                        $$
                        e_i=begin{pmatrix}
                        0\
                        vdots\
                        0\
                        1\
                        0\
                        vdots\
                        0
                        end{pmatrix}inmathbb R^{n+1}
                        $$

                        with the entry $1$ in the $i$-th row. These points are exactly the vertices of the $n$-simplex $Delta_n$.



                        Given this, you can compute that the $d_i$ and $s_i$ satisfy indeed the simplicial identities.






                        share|cite|improve this answer























                          up vote
                          0
                          down vote










                          up vote
                          0
                          down vote









                          The point $e_i$ is just
                          $$
                          e_i=begin{pmatrix}
                          0\
                          vdots\
                          0\
                          1\
                          0\
                          vdots\
                          0
                          end{pmatrix}inmathbb R^{n+1}
                          $$

                          with the entry $1$ in the $i$-th row. These points are exactly the vertices of the $n$-simplex $Delta_n$.



                          Given this, you can compute that the $d_i$ and $s_i$ satisfy indeed the simplicial identities.






                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          The point $e_i$ is just
                          $$
                          e_i=begin{pmatrix}
                          0\
                          vdots\
                          0\
                          1\
                          0\
                          vdots\
                          0
                          end{pmatrix}inmathbb R^{n+1}
                          $$

                          with the entry $1$ in the $i$-th row. These points are exactly the vertices of the $n$-simplex $Delta_n$.



                          Given this, you can compute that the $d_i$ and $s_i$ satisfy indeed the simplicial identities.







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered Nov 21 at 13:38









                          Fumera

                          235




                          235






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                              Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                              Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3007689%2fsingular-n-simplex-unknown-notation-homology%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Quarter-circle Tiles

                              build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

                              Mont Emei