$| U_{n+1} - 2/3|leqslant 1/2 | U_n-2/3 |+ epsilon$











up vote
0
down vote

favorite
1












I'm not able to find a way to prove this inequality:



"$U_n$ is defined by
$U_0 = U_1=3/2$ and $U_{n+2}=1 + sqrt{U_{n+1}U_n}$.
Fix a real number '$epsilon$' that is strictly positive.
Show that there is a natural number $n_epsilon$ such that for
every $n$ bigger than $n_epsilon$, $| U_{n+1} - 2/3| leqslant 1/2 |U_n-2/3| + epsilon$."



Any help regarding this problem is appreciated. Thanks in advance.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • This question makes no sense
    – Daniel
    Nov 21 at 20:10










  • @Daniel link You can check it on Exercice 7 , It's french but I can translate for you.
    – Alae Cherkaoui
    Nov 21 at 20:18






  • 2




    You did not give the definition of $U_n$
    – Daniel
    Nov 21 at 20:23






  • 1




    Notice that in the picture you sent, the exercise 6 also mentions sequences $v_n$ and $u_n$ that seem to be already defined. Look the previous exercises and find the definition of $U_n$ (actually, $v_n$ in the book), otherwise it makes no sense.
    – Daniel
    Nov 21 at 20:56






  • 1




    You should try to do the previous exercises, since it seems they will help you with this one. Applying the triangular inequality to the equation on exercise 6 gives $|v_{n+1} - frac23| le mid frac12(v_n - frac23)mid + |v_n alpha_n| $ and apparently this $alpha_n$ converges to $0$...
    – Daniel
    Nov 21 at 21:29















up vote
0
down vote

favorite
1












I'm not able to find a way to prove this inequality:



"$U_n$ is defined by
$U_0 = U_1=3/2$ and $U_{n+2}=1 + sqrt{U_{n+1}U_n}$.
Fix a real number '$epsilon$' that is strictly positive.
Show that there is a natural number $n_epsilon$ such that for
every $n$ bigger than $n_epsilon$, $| U_{n+1} - 2/3| leqslant 1/2 |U_n-2/3| + epsilon$."



Any help regarding this problem is appreciated. Thanks in advance.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • This question makes no sense
    – Daniel
    Nov 21 at 20:10










  • @Daniel link You can check it on Exercice 7 , It's french but I can translate for you.
    – Alae Cherkaoui
    Nov 21 at 20:18






  • 2




    You did not give the definition of $U_n$
    – Daniel
    Nov 21 at 20:23






  • 1




    Notice that in the picture you sent, the exercise 6 also mentions sequences $v_n$ and $u_n$ that seem to be already defined. Look the previous exercises and find the definition of $U_n$ (actually, $v_n$ in the book), otherwise it makes no sense.
    – Daniel
    Nov 21 at 20:56






  • 1




    You should try to do the previous exercises, since it seems they will help you with this one. Applying the triangular inequality to the equation on exercise 6 gives $|v_{n+1} - frac23| le mid frac12(v_n - frac23)mid + |v_n alpha_n| $ and apparently this $alpha_n$ converges to $0$...
    – Daniel
    Nov 21 at 21:29













up vote
0
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
0
down vote

favorite
1






1





I'm not able to find a way to prove this inequality:



"$U_n$ is defined by
$U_0 = U_1=3/2$ and $U_{n+2}=1 + sqrt{U_{n+1}U_n}$.
Fix a real number '$epsilon$' that is strictly positive.
Show that there is a natural number $n_epsilon$ such that for
every $n$ bigger than $n_epsilon$, $| U_{n+1} - 2/3| leqslant 1/2 |U_n-2/3| + epsilon$."



Any help regarding this problem is appreciated. Thanks in advance.










share|cite|improve this question















I'm not able to find a way to prove this inequality:



"$U_n$ is defined by
$U_0 = U_1=3/2$ and $U_{n+2}=1 + sqrt{U_{n+1}U_n}$.
Fix a real number '$epsilon$' that is strictly positive.
Show that there is a natural number $n_epsilon$ such that for
every $n$ bigger than $n_epsilon$, $| U_{n+1} - 2/3| leqslant 1/2 |U_n-2/3| + epsilon$."



Any help regarding this problem is appreciated. Thanks in advance.







sequences-and-series






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 21 at 21:06









Daniel

1,516210




1,516210










asked Nov 21 at 20:03









Alae Cherkaoui

84




84












  • This question makes no sense
    – Daniel
    Nov 21 at 20:10










  • @Daniel link You can check it on Exercice 7 , It's french but I can translate for you.
    – Alae Cherkaoui
    Nov 21 at 20:18






  • 2




    You did not give the definition of $U_n$
    – Daniel
    Nov 21 at 20:23






  • 1




    Notice that in the picture you sent, the exercise 6 also mentions sequences $v_n$ and $u_n$ that seem to be already defined. Look the previous exercises and find the definition of $U_n$ (actually, $v_n$ in the book), otherwise it makes no sense.
    – Daniel
    Nov 21 at 20:56






  • 1




    You should try to do the previous exercises, since it seems they will help you with this one. Applying the triangular inequality to the equation on exercise 6 gives $|v_{n+1} - frac23| le mid frac12(v_n - frac23)mid + |v_n alpha_n| $ and apparently this $alpha_n$ converges to $0$...
    – Daniel
    Nov 21 at 21:29


















  • This question makes no sense
    – Daniel
    Nov 21 at 20:10










  • @Daniel link You can check it on Exercice 7 , It's french but I can translate for you.
    – Alae Cherkaoui
    Nov 21 at 20:18






  • 2




    You did not give the definition of $U_n$
    – Daniel
    Nov 21 at 20:23






  • 1




    Notice that in the picture you sent, the exercise 6 also mentions sequences $v_n$ and $u_n$ that seem to be already defined. Look the previous exercises and find the definition of $U_n$ (actually, $v_n$ in the book), otherwise it makes no sense.
    – Daniel
    Nov 21 at 20:56






  • 1




    You should try to do the previous exercises, since it seems they will help you with this one. Applying the triangular inequality to the equation on exercise 6 gives $|v_{n+1} - frac23| le mid frac12(v_n - frac23)mid + |v_n alpha_n| $ and apparently this $alpha_n$ converges to $0$...
    – Daniel
    Nov 21 at 21:29
















This question makes no sense
– Daniel
Nov 21 at 20:10




This question makes no sense
– Daniel
Nov 21 at 20:10












@Daniel link You can check it on Exercice 7 , It's french but I can translate for you.
– Alae Cherkaoui
Nov 21 at 20:18




@Daniel link You can check it on Exercice 7 , It's french but I can translate for you.
– Alae Cherkaoui
Nov 21 at 20:18




2




2




You did not give the definition of $U_n$
– Daniel
Nov 21 at 20:23




You did not give the definition of $U_n$
– Daniel
Nov 21 at 20:23




1




1




Notice that in the picture you sent, the exercise 6 also mentions sequences $v_n$ and $u_n$ that seem to be already defined. Look the previous exercises and find the definition of $U_n$ (actually, $v_n$ in the book), otherwise it makes no sense.
– Daniel
Nov 21 at 20:56




Notice that in the picture you sent, the exercise 6 also mentions sequences $v_n$ and $u_n$ that seem to be already defined. Look the previous exercises and find the definition of $U_n$ (actually, $v_n$ in the book), otherwise it makes no sense.
– Daniel
Nov 21 at 20:56




1




1




You should try to do the previous exercises, since it seems they will help you with this one. Applying the triangular inequality to the equation on exercise 6 gives $|v_{n+1} - frac23| le mid frac12(v_n - frac23)mid + |v_n alpha_n| $ and apparently this $alpha_n$ converges to $0$...
– Daniel
Nov 21 at 21:29




You should try to do the previous exercises, since it seems they will help you with this one. Applying the triangular inequality to the equation on exercise 6 gives $|v_{n+1} - frac23| le mid frac12(v_n - frac23)mid + |v_n alpha_n| $ and apparently this $alpha_n$ converges to $0$...
– Daniel
Nov 21 at 21:29















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3008270%2fu-n1-2-3-leqslant-1-2-u-n-2-3-epsilon%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown






























active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3008270%2fu-n1-2-3-leqslant-1-2-u-n-2-3-epsilon%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Quarter-circle Tiles

build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

Mont Emei