Are all extensions of finite fields cyclic?
$begingroup$
My book says all extensions of finite fields are cyclic, but I could not find a proof (maybe I haven't looked hard enough). If it's straightforward, can you tell me why it's true? Thanks :)
abstract-algebra
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
My book says all extensions of finite fields are cyclic, but I could not find a proof (maybe I haven't looked hard enough). If it's straightforward, can you tell me why it's true? Thanks :)
abstract-algebra
$endgroup$
5
$begingroup$
Please make the body of your messages self-contained. "My books says this is true" is not a particularly informative first sentence. Titles/subject lines are no more part of the content of the message than the publisher's imprint on the spine of the book is part of the novel.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
May 10 '11 at 16:05
add a comment |
$begingroup$
My book says all extensions of finite fields are cyclic, but I could not find a proof (maybe I haven't looked hard enough). If it's straightforward, can you tell me why it's true? Thanks :)
abstract-algebra
$endgroup$
My book says all extensions of finite fields are cyclic, but I could not find a proof (maybe I haven't looked hard enough). If it's straightforward, can you tell me why it's true? Thanks :)
abstract-algebra
abstract-algebra
edited May 10 '11 at 16:03
Arturo Magidin
264k34587915
264k34587915
asked May 10 '11 at 5:23
badatmathbadatmath
1,92932042
1,92932042
5
$begingroup$
Please make the body of your messages self-contained. "My books says this is true" is not a particularly informative first sentence. Titles/subject lines are no more part of the content of the message than the publisher's imprint on the spine of the book is part of the novel.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
May 10 '11 at 16:05
add a comment |
5
$begingroup$
Please make the body of your messages self-contained. "My books says this is true" is not a particularly informative first sentence. Titles/subject lines are no more part of the content of the message than the publisher's imprint on the spine of the book is part of the novel.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
May 10 '11 at 16:05
5
5
$begingroup$
Please make the body of your messages self-contained. "My books says this is true" is not a particularly informative first sentence. Titles/subject lines are no more part of the content of the message than the publisher's imprint on the spine of the book is part of the novel.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
May 10 '11 at 16:05
$begingroup$
Please make the body of your messages self-contained. "My books says this is true" is not a particularly informative first sentence. Titles/subject lines are no more part of the content of the message than the publisher's imprint on the spine of the book is part of the novel.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
May 10 '11 at 16:05
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I'm not sure that the cyclicity of the unit group of a finite field is being used here. (Not that I have any problem using it: see e.g. Section 2 of these notes for a proof.)
Let $K/mathbb{F}_q$ be a field extension of degree $n$, so $# K = q^n$. Let $sigma: K rightarrow K$ be $x mapsto x^q$. Recall:
(Lagrange's Little Theorem): Let $G$ be a finite abelian group of order $n$ and
$g in G$. Then the order of $g$ divides $n$.
The point is that LLT is a special case of Lagrange's Theorem which can be proved by the same argument which proves Fermat's Little Theorem -- i.e., the special case in which $G = mathbb{F}_p^{times}$. So one need not talk about cosets and such...
Let $x in mathbb{F}_q$. I claim that $x^q = x$. This is clear if $x = 0$, and otherwise apply LLT to $x in mathbb{F}_q^{times}$ to get $x^{q-1} = 1$, which implies $x^q = x$.
Therefore $sigma$ is an automorphism of $K/mathbb{F}_q$. As for its order, suppose
$sigma^i$ is equal to the identity: that is, for all $x in K$, $x^{q^i} = x$. We have $P_i(t) = t^{q^i} - t in K[t]$ is a polynomial of degree $q^i$ over the field $K$, so by the Root-Factor Theorem (a consequence of the division algorithm for polynomials), $P_i(t)$ has at most $q^i$ roots. It follows that the order of $sigma$ is equal to $n = log_q(# K)$. Thus the cyclic group generated by $sigma$ is a degree $n$ subgroup of $operatorname{Aut}(K/mathbb{F}_q)$. But by basic Galois theory, for an extension $K/F$ of degree $n$, we have $# operatorname{Aut}(K/F) leq n$, with equality holding if and only if $K/F$ is Galois. Therefore $K/mathbb{F}_q$
is a cyclic Galois extension.
If we like, we can now establish that there is a unique cyclic extension of degree $n$ for any $n in mathbb{Z}^+$: we can take
the splitting field of $t^{q^n} - t$, and splitting fields exist and are unique up to (nonunique) isomorphism over the ground field.
It seems to me that I have not used the cyclicity of $mathbb{F}_q^{times}$ anywhere...
$endgroup$
5
$begingroup$
sorry for the offtopic nonsense but I think it's great you came back..
$endgroup$
– quanta
May 10 '11 at 19:51
4
$begingroup$
@quanta: thanks. Let's see if we can avoid making a big deal out of it...
$endgroup$
– Pete L. Clark
May 10 '11 at 19:54
1
$begingroup$
@PeteL.Clark : $G$ need not be abelian for FLT to hold , right ?
$endgroup$
– Theorem
Feb 8 '13 at 14:54
$begingroup$
@Theorem: I'm not sure what "FLT" stands for here. Definitely Lagrange's Theorem holds for all finite groups. But the proof which generalizes the standard proof of Fermat's Little Theorem (hmm, FLT?) works only for finite abelian groups. So far as I know, in order to prove Lagrange's Theorem in the nonabelian case one needs to discuss cosets.
$endgroup$
– Pete L. Clark
Feb 8 '13 at 17:21
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Any finite extension of a finite field $mathbb{F}_q$ is cyclic. For such an extension $K$ first recall that the Frobenius map $x mapsto x^q$ is an $mathbb{F}_q$-linear endomorphism. If $x^q = y^q$ then $(x - y)^q = 0$, hence $x = y$, so the Frobenius map is injective. Since it is an injective linear map from a finite-dimensional vector space to itself, it is surjective, so it is an automorphism. Its fixed field is the subfield of roots of $x^q - x$, which are precisely the elements of the base field $mathbb{F}_q$. It follows that $K$ is Galois with Galois group the cyclic group generated by $x mapsto x^q$.
(I guess when I say $mathbb{F}_q$ I am being mildly circular. Interpret the above proof as follows: any finite extension of $mathbb{F}_p$ is cyclic, and in fact the above proof shows that they are all of the form $mathbb{F}_{p^n}$ using the fact that any finite subgroup of the multiplicative group of a field is cyclic, so finite fields $mathbb{F}_q$ really do have Frobenius maps like I just claimed they do, and then apply the proof again to $mathbb{F}_q$.)
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
How about algebraic but infinite extensions of a finite field ?
$endgroup$
– Fardad Pouran
Nov 28 '14 at 22:11
1
$begingroup$
@Fardad: they are "topologically cyclic" in the sense that the subgroup of the Galois group generated by the Frobenius map is dense.
$endgroup$
– Qiaochu Yuan
Nov 28 '14 at 22:20
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Below is a complete, noncircular simple proof of the result mentioned by Qiaochu that avoids invoking the high-powered structure theorem for finite abelian groups.
Theorem $ $ A finite subgroup $rm:G:$ of the multiplicative group of a field is cyclic.
Proof $ $ The proposition below yields, with $rm,m = maxord(G) = expt(G),,$ that $rm, x^m = 1,$ has $rm:#G:$ roots. Since a polynomial $rm:f:$ over a field satisfies $rm:#roots f le deg f:$ we infer that $rm: #G le m.:$ But maxorder $rm:m le #G:$ since $rm:g^{#G} = 1:$ for all $rm:g in G:$ (Lagrange). $:$ Thus $rm:m = #G = maxord(G),:$ therefore $rm:G:$ has an element of order $rm#G,:$ hence $rm:G:$ is cyclic.
$begin{eqnarray}rm{bf Proposition}qquad maxord(G) &=&,rm expt(G) text{ for a finite abelian group} G, i.e.\[.5em]
rm max { ord(g) : : g in G} &=&,rm min { n>0 : : g^n = 1 forall g in G}end{eqnarray}$
Proof $ $ By the lemma below, $rm: S, =, { ord(g) : :g in G }$ is a finite
set of naturals closed under$rm lcm$.
Hence every $rm s in S:$ is a
divisor of the max elt $rm: m $ [else $rm: lcm(s,m) > m,$],$ $ so $rm m = expt(G)$.
Lemma $ $ A finite abelian group $rm:G:$ has an lcm-closed order set, i.e. with $rm: o(X) = $ order of $rm, X$
$$rm X,Y in G Rightarrow exists Z in G: o(Z) = lcm(o(X),o(Y))$$
Proof $ $ By induction on $rm: o(X), o(Y). $ If it's $:1:$ then trivially $rm:Z = 1$. $ $ Otherwise
write $rm, o(X), =: AP,: o(Y) = BP', P'mid P = p^m > 1, $ prime $rm: p:$ coprime to $rm: A,B.$
Then $rm, o(X^P) = A, o(Y^{P'}) = B. $ By induction there's a $rm: Z:$ with $rm : o(Z) = lcm(A,B)$
thus $rm, o(X^A Z) = P lcm(A,B) = lcm(AP,BP') = lcm(o(X),o(Y)).$
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
I think the OP was asking if the (finite) extension $K/mathbb{F}_q$ is a cyclic extension, namely that $mbox{Gal}(K/mathbb{F}_q)$ is a cyclic group. Does this immediately follow from the fact that $K^times$ is a cyclic group?
$endgroup$
– Alon Amit
May 10 '11 at 16:15
$begingroup$
@Alon I've edited it to clarify that it was meant to support Qiaochu's answer.
$endgroup$
– Bill Dubuque
May 10 '11 at 18:04
5
$begingroup$
Sadly, it looks like this nice answer is destined to be one of the gems at the tail end of the voting range. To work against that, I'm voting it up.
$endgroup$
– t.b.
May 10 '11 at 19:02
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f38197%2fare-all-extensions-of-finite-fields-cyclic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I'm not sure that the cyclicity of the unit group of a finite field is being used here. (Not that I have any problem using it: see e.g. Section 2 of these notes for a proof.)
Let $K/mathbb{F}_q$ be a field extension of degree $n$, so $# K = q^n$. Let $sigma: K rightarrow K$ be $x mapsto x^q$. Recall:
(Lagrange's Little Theorem): Let $G$ be a finite abelian group of order $n$ and
$g in G$. Then the order of $g$ divides $n$.
The point is that LLT is a special case of Lagrange's Theorem which can be proved by the same argument which proves Fermat's Little Theorem -- i.e., the special case in which $G = mathbb{F}_p^{times}$. So one need not talk about cosets and such...
Let $x in mathbb{F}_q$. I claim that $x^q = x$. This is clear if $x = 0$, and otherwise apply LLT to $x in mathbb{F}_q^{times}$ to get $x^{q-1} = 1$, which implies $x^q = x$.
Therefore $sigma$ is an automorphism of $K/mathbb{F}_q$. As for its order, suppose
$sigma^i$ is equal to the identity: that is, for all $x in K$, $x^{q^i} = x$. We have $P_i(t) = t^{q^i} - t in K[t]$ is a polynomial of degree $q^i$ over the field $K$, so by the Root-Factor Theorem (a consequence of the division algorithm for polynomials), $P_i(t)$ has at most $q^i$ roots. It follows that the order of $sigma$ is equal to $n = log_q(# K)$. Thus the cyclic group generated by $sigma$ is a degree $n$ subgroup of $operatorname{Aut}(K/mathbb{F}_q)$. But by basic Galois theory, for an extension $K/F$ of degree $n$, we have $# operatorname{Aut}(K/F) leq n$, with equality holding if and only if $K/F$ is Galois. Therefore $K/mathbb{F}_q$
is a cyclic Galois extension.
If we like, we can now establish that there is a unique cyclic extension of degree $n$ for any $n in mathbb{Z}^+$: we can take
the splitting field of $t^{q^n} - t$, and splitting fields exist and are unique up to (nonunique) isomorphism over the ground field.
It seems to me that I have not used the cyclicity of $mathbb{F}_q^{times}$ anywhere...
$endgroup$
5
$begingroup$
sorry for the offtopic nonsense but I think it's great you came back..
$endgroup$
– quanta
May 10 '11 at 19:51
4
$begingroup$
@quanta: thanks. Let's see if we can avoid making a big deal out of it...
$endgroup$
– Pete L. Clark
May 10 '11 at 19:54
1
$begingroup$
@PeteL.Clark : $G$ need not be abelian for FLT to hold , right ?
$endgroup$
– Theorem
Feb 8 '13 at 14:54
$begingroup$
@Theorem: I'm not sure what "FLT" stands for here. Definitely Lagrange's Theorem holds for all finite groups. But the proof which generalizes the standard proof of Fermat's Little Theorem (hmm, FLT?) works only for finite abelian groups. So far as I know, in order to prove Lagrange's Theorem in the nonabelian case one needs to discuss cosets.
$endgroup$
– Pete L. Clark
Feb 8 '13 at 17:21
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm not sure that the cyclicity of the unit group of a finite field is being used here. (Not that I have any problem using it: see e.g. Section 2 of these notes for a proof.)
Let $K/mathbb{F}_q$ be a field extension of degree $n$, so $# K = q^n$. Let $sigma: K rightarrow K$ be $x mapsto x^q$. Recall:
(Lagrange's Little Theorem): Let $G$ be a finite abelian group of order $n$ and
$g in G$. Then the order of $g$ divides $n$.
The point is that LLT is a special case of Lagrange's Theorem which can be proved by the same argument which proves Fermat's Little Theorem -- i.e., the special case in which $G = mathbb{F}_p^{times}$. So one need not talk about cosets and such...
Let $x in mathbb{F}_q$. I claim that $x^q = x$. This is clear if $x = 0$, and otherwise apply LLT to $x in mathbb{F}_q^{times}$ to get $x^{q-1} = 1$, which implies $x^q = x$.
Therefore $sigma$ is an automorphism of $K/mathbb{F}_q$. As for its order, suppose
$sigma^i$ is equal to the identity: that is, for all $x in K$, $x^{q^i} = x$. We have $P_i(t) = t^{q^i} - t in K[t]$ is a polynomial of degree $q^i$ over the field $K$, so by the Root-Factor Theorem (a consequence of the division algorithm for polynomials), $P_i(t)$ has at most $q^i$ roots. It follows that the order of $sigma$ is equal to $n = log_q(# K)$. Thus the cyclic group generated by $sigma$ is a degree $n$ subgroup of $operatorname{Aut}(K/mathbb{F}_q)$. But by basic Galois theory, for an extension $K/F$ of degree $n$, we have $# operatorname{Aut}(K/F) leq n$, with equality holding if and only if $K/F$ is Galois. Therefore $K/mathbb{F}_q$
is a cyclic Galois extension.
If we like, we can now establish that there is a unique cyclic extension of degree $n$ for any $n in mathbb{Z}^+$: we can take
the splitting field of $t^{q^n} - t$, and splitting fields exist and are unique up to (nonunique) isomorphism over the ground field.
It seems to me that I have not used the cyclicity of $mathbb{F}_q^{times}$ anywhere...
$endgroup$
5
$begingroup$
sorry for the offtopic nonsense but I think it's great you came back..
$endgroup$
– quanta
May 10 '11 at 19:51
4
$begingroup$
@quanta: thanks. Let's see if we can avoid making a big deal out of it...
$endgroup$
– Pete L. Clark
May 10 '11 at 19:54
1
$begingroup$
@PeteL.Clark : $G$ need not be abelian for FLT to hold , right ?
$endgroup$
– Theorem
Feb 8 '13 at 14:54
$begingroup$
@Theorem: I'm not sure what "FLT" stands for here. Definitely Lagrange's Theorem holds for all finite groups. But the proof which generalizes the standard proof of Fermat's Little Theorem (hmm, FLT?) works only for finite abelian groups. So far as I know, in order to prove Lagrange's Theorem in the nonabelian case one needs to discuss cosets.
$endgroup$
– Pete L. Clark
Feb 8 '13 at 17:21
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm not sure that the cyclicity of the unit group of a finite field is being used here. (Not that I have any problem using it: see e.g. Section 2 of these notes for a proof.)
Let $K/mathbb{F}_q$ be a field extension of degree $n$, so $# K = q^n$. Let $sigma: K rightarrow K$ be $x mapsto x^q$. Recall:
(Lagrange's Little Theorem): Let $G$ be a finite abelian group of order $n$ and
$g in G$. Then the order of $g$ divides $n$.
The point is that LLT is a special case of Lagrange's Theorem which can be proved by the same argument which proves Fermat's Little Theorem -- i.e., the special case in which $G = mathbb{F}_p^{times}$. So one need not talk about cosets and such...
Let $x in mathbb{F}_q$. I claim that $x^q = x$. This is clear if $x = 0$, and otherwise apply LLT to $x in mathbb{F}_q^{times}$ to get $x^{q-1} = 1$, which implies $x^q = x$.
Therefore $sigma$ is an automorphism of $K/mathbb{F}_q$. As for its order, suppose
$sigma^i$ is equal to the identity: that is, for all $x in K$, $x^{q^i} = x$. We have $P_i(t) = t^{q^i} - t in K[t]$ is a polynomial of degree $q^i$ over the field $K$, so by the Root-Factor Theorem (a consequence of the division algorithm for polynomials), $P_i(t)$ has at most $q^i$ roots. It follows that the order of $sigma$ is equal to $n = log_q(# K)$. Thus the cyclic group generated by $sigma$ is a degree $n$ subgroup of $operatorname{Aut}(K/mathbb{F}_q)$. But by basic Galois theory, for an extension $K/F$ of degree $n$, we have $# operatorname{Aut}(K/F) leq n$, with equality holding if and only if $K/F$ is Galois. Therefore $K/mathbb{F}_q$
is a cyclic Galois extension.
If we like, we can now establish that there is a unique cyclic extension of degree $n$ for any $n in mathbb{Z}^+$: we can take
the splitting field of $t^{q^n} - t$, and splitting fields exist and are unique up to (nonunique) isomorphism over the ground field.
It seems to me that I have not used the cyclicity of $mathbb{F}_q^{times}$ anywhere...
$endgroup$
I'm not sure that the cyclicity of the unit group of a finite field is being used here. (Not that I have any problem using it: see e.g. Section 2 of these notes for a proof.)
Let $K/mathbb{F}_q$ be a field extension of degree $n$, so $# K = q^n$. Let $sigma: K rightarrow K$ be $x mapsto x^q$. Recall:
(Lagrange's Little Theorem): Let $G$ be a finite abelian group of order $n$ and
$g in G$. Then the order of $g$ divides $n$.
The point is that LLT is a special case of Lagrange's Theorem which can be proved by the same argument which proves Fermat's Little Theorem -- i.e., the special case in which $G = mathbb{F}_p^{times}$. So one need not talk about cosets and such...
Let $x in mathbb{F}_q$. I claim that $x^q = x$. This is clear if $x = 0$, and otherwise apply LLT to $x in mathbb{F}_q^{times}$ to get $x^{q-1} = 1$, which implies $x^q = x$.
Therefore $sigma$ is an automorphism of $K/mathbb{F}_q$. As for its order, suppose
$sigma^i$ is equal to the identity: that is, for all $x in K$, $x^{q^i} = x$. We have $P_i(t) = t^{q^i} - t in K[t]$ is a polynomial of degree $q^i$ over the field $K$, so by the Root-Factor Theorem (a consequence of the division algorithm for polynomials), $P_i(t)$ has at most $q^i$ roots. It follows that the order of $sigma$ is equal to $n = log_q(# K)$. Thus the cyclic group generated by $sigma$ is a degree $n$ subgroup of $operatorname{Aut}(K/mathbb{F}_q)$. But by basic Galois theory, for an extension $K/F$ of degree $n$, we have $# operatorname{Aut}(K/F) leq n$, with equality holding if and only if $K/F$ is Galois. Therefore $K/mathbb{F}_q$
is a cyclic Galois extension.
If we like, we can now establish that there is a unique cyclic extension of degree $n$ for any $n in mathbb{Z}^+$: we can take
the splitting field of $t^{q^n} - t$, and splitting fields exist and are unique up to (nonunique) isomorphism over the ground field.
It seems to me that I have not used the cyclicity of $mathbb{F}_q^{times}$ anywhere...
edited Dec 8 '16 at 2:09
Martin Sleziak
44.7k10119272
44.7k10119272
answered May 10 '11 at 19:44
Pete L. ClarkPete L. Clark
80.6k9161312
80.6k9161312
5
$begingroup$
sorry for the offtopic nonsense but I think it's great you came back..
$endgroup$
– quanta
May 10 '11 at 19:51
4
$begingroup$
@quanta: thanks. Let's see if we can avoid making a big deal out of it...
$endgroup$
– Pete L. Clark
May 10 '11 at 19:54
1
$begingroup$
@PeteL.Clark : $G$ need not be abelian for FLT to hold , right ?
$endgroup$
– Theorem
Feb 8 '13 at 14:54
$begingroup$
@Theorem: I'm not sure what "FLT" stands for here. Definitely Lagrange's Theorem holds for all finite groups. But the proof which generalizes the standard proof of Fermat's Little Theorem (hmm, FLT?) works only for finite abelian groups. So far as I know, in order to prove Lagrange's Theorem in the nonabelian case one needs to discuss cosets.
$endgroup$
– Pete L. Clark
Feb 8 '13 at 17:21
add a comment |
5
$begingroup$
sorry for the offtopic nonsense but I think it's great you came back..
$endgroup$
– quanta
May 10 '11 at 19:51
4
$begingroup$
@quanta: thanks. Let's see if we can avoid making a big deal out of it...
$endgroup$
– Pete L. Clark
May 10 '11 at 19:54
1
$begingroup$
@PeteL.Clark : $G$ need not be abelian for FLT to hold , right ?
$endgroup$
– Theorem
Feb 8 '13 at 14:54
$begingroup$
@Theorem: I'm not sure what "FLT" stands for here. Definitely Lagrange's Theorem holds for all finite groups. But the proof which generalizes the standard proof of Fermat's Little Theorem (hmm, FLT?) works only for finite abelian groups. So far as I know, in order to prove Lagrange's Theorem in the nonabelian case one needs to discuss cosets.
$endgroup$
– Pete L. Clark
Feb 8 '13 at 17:21
5
5
$begingroup$
sorry for the offtopic nonsense but I think it's great you came back..
$endgroup$
– quanta
May 10 '11 at 19:51
$begingroup$
sorry for the offtopic nonsense but I think it's great you came back..
$endgroup$
– quanta
May 10 '11 at 19:51
4
4
$begingroup$
@quanta: thanks. Let's see if we can avoid making a big deal out of it...
$endgroup$
– Pete L. Clark
May 10 '11 at 19:54
$begingroup$
@quanta: thanks. Let's see if we can avoid making a big deal out of it...
$endgroup$
– Pete L. Clark
May 10 '11 at 19:54
1
1
$begingroup$
@PeteL.Clark : $G$ need not be abelian for FLT to hold , right ?
$endgroup$
– Theorem
Feb 8 '13 at 14:54
$begingroup$
@PeteL.Clark : $G$ need not be abelian for FLT to hold , right ?
$endgroup$
– Theorem
Feb 8 '13 at 14:54
$begingroup$
@Theorem: I'm not sure what "FLT" stands for here. Definitely Lagrange's Theorem holds for all finite groups. But the proof which generalizes the standard proof of Fermat's Little Theorem (hmm, FLT?) works only for finite abelian groups. So far as I know, in order to prove Lagrange's Theorem in the nonabelian case one needs to discuss cosets.
$endgroup$
– Pete L. Clark
Feb 8 '13 at 17:21
$begingroup$
@Theorem: I'm not sure what "FLT" stands for here. Definitely Lagrange's Theorem holds for all finite groups. But the proof which generalizes the standard proof of Fermat's Little Theorem (hmm, FLT?) works only for finite abelian groups. So far as I know, in order to prove Lagrange's Theorem in the nonabelian case one needs to discuss cosets.
$endgroup$
– Pete L. Clark
Feb 8 '13 at 17:21
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Any finite extension of a finite field $mathbb{F}_q$ is cyclic. For such an extension $K$ first recall that the Frobenius map $x mapsto x^q$ is an $mathbb{F}_q$-linear endomorphism. If $x^q = y^q$ then $(x - y)^q = 0$, hence $x = y$, so the Frobenius map is injective. Since it is an injective linear map from a finite-dimensional vector space to itself, it is surjective, so it is an automorphism. Its fixed field is the subfield of roots of $x^q - x$, which are precisely the elements of the base field $mathbb{F}_q$. It follows that $K$ is Galois with Galois group the cyclic group generated by $x mapsto x^q$.
(I guess when I say $mathbb{F}_q$ I am being mildly circular. Interpret the above proof as follows: any finite extension of $mathbb{F}_p$ is cyclic, and in fact the above proof shows that they are all of the form $mathbb{F}_{p^n}$ using the fact that any finite subgroup of the multiplicative group of a field is cyclic, so finite fields $mathbb{F}_q$ really do have Frobenius maps like I just claimed they do, and then apply the proof again to $mathbb{F}_q$.)
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
How about algebraic but infinite extensions of a finite field ?
$endgroup$
– Fardad Pouran
Nov 28 '14 at 22:11
1
$begingroup$
@Fardad: they are "topologically cyclic" in the sense that the subgroup of the Galois group generated by the Frobenius map is dense.
$endgroup$
– Qiaochu Yuan
Nov 28 '14 at 22:20
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Any finite extension of a finite field $mathbb{F}_q$ is cyclic. For such an extension $K$ first recall that the Frobenius map $x mapsto x^q$ is an $mathbb{F}_q$-linear endomorphism. If $x^q = y^q$ then $(x - y)^q = 0$, hence $x = y$, so the Frobenius map is injective. Since it is an injective linear map from a finite-dimensional vector space to itself, it is surjective, so it is an automorphism. Its fixed field is the subfield of roots of $x^q - x$, which are precisely the elements of the base field $mathbb{F}_q$. It follows that $K$ is Galois with Galois group the cyclic group generated by $x mapsto x^q$.
(I guess when I say $mathbb{F}_q$ I am being mildly circular. Interpret the above proof as follows: any finite extension of $mathbb{F}_p$ is cyclic, and in fact the above proof shows that they are all of the form $mathbb{F}_{p^n}$ using the fact that any finite subgroup of the multiplicative group of a field is cyclic, so finite fields $mathbb{F}_q$ really do have Frobenius maps like I just claimed they do, and then apply the proof again to $mathbb{F}_q$.)
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
How about algebraic but infinite extensions of a finite field ?
$endgroup$
– Fardad Pouran
Nov 28 '14 at 22:11
1
$begingroup$
@Fardad: they are "topologically cyclic" in the sense that the subgroup of the Galois group generated by the Frobenius map is dense.
$endgroup$
– Qiaochu Yuan
Nov 28 '14 at 22:20
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Any finite extension of a finite field $mathbb{F}_q$ is cyclic. For such an extension $K$ first recall that the Frobenius map $x mapsto x^q$ is an $mathbb{F}_q$-linear endomorphism. If $x^q = y^q$ then $(x - y)^q = 0$, hence $x = y$, so the Frobenius map is injective. Since it is an injective linear map from a finite-dimensional vector space to itself, it is surjective, so it is an automorphism. Its fixed field is the subfield of roots of $x^q - x$, which are precisely the elements of the base field $mathbb{F}_q$. It follows that $K$ is Galois with Galois group the cyclic group generated by $x mapsto x^q$.
(I guess when I say $mathbb{F}_q$ I am being mildly circular. Interpret the above proof as follows: any finite extension of $mathbb{F}_p$ is cyclic, and in fact the above proof shows that they are all of the form $mathbb{F}_{p^n}$ using the fact that any finite subgroup of the multiplicative group of a field is cyclic, so finite fields $mathbb{F}_q$ really do have Frobenius maps like I just claimed they do, and then apply the proof again to $mathbb{F}_q$.)
$endgroup$
Any finite extension of a finite field $mathbb{F}_q$ is cyclic. For such an extension $K$ first recall that the Frobenius map $x mapsto x^q$ is an $mathbb{F}_q$-linear endomorphism. If $x^q = y^q$ then $(x - y)^q = 0$, hence $x = y$, so the Frobenius map is injective. Since it is an injective linear map from a finite-dimensional vector space to itself, it is surjective, so it is an automorphism. Its fixed field is the subfield of roots of $x^q - x$, which are precisely the elements of the base field $mathbb{F}_q$. It follows that $K$ is Galois with Galois group the cyclic group generated by $x mapsto x^q$.
(I guess when I say $mathbb{F}_q$ I am being mildly circular. Interpret the above proof as follows: any finite extension of $mathbb{F}_p$ is cyclic, and in fact the above proof shows that they are all of the form $mathbb{F}_{p^n}$ using the fact that any finite subgroup of the multiplicative group of a field is cyclic, so finite fields $mathbb{F}_q$ really do have Frobenius maps like I just claimed they do, and then apply the proof again to $mathbb{F}_q$.)
answered May 10 '11 at 5:49
Qiaochu YuanQiaochu Yuan
279k32590935
279k32590935
$begingroup$
How about algebraic but infinite extensions of a finite field ?
$endgroup$
– Fardad Pouran
Nov 28 '14 at 22:11
1
$begingroup$
@Fardad: they are "topologically cyclic" in the sense that the subgroup of the Galois group generated by the Frobenius map is dense.
$endgroup$
– Qiaochu Yuan
Nov 28 '14 at 22:20
add a comment |
$begingroup$
How about algebraic but infinite extensions of a finite field ?
$endgroup$
– Fardad Pouran
Nov 28 '14 at 22:11
1
$begingroup$
@Fardad: they are "topologically cyclic" in the sense that the subgroup of the Galois group generated by the Frobenius map is dense.
$endgroup$
– Qiaochu Yuan
Nov 28 '14 at 22:20
$begingroup$
How about algebraic but infinite extensions of a finite field ?
$endgroup$
– Fardad Pouran
Nov 28 '14 at 22:11
$begingroup$
How about algebraic but infinite extensions of a finite field ?
$endgroup$
– Fardad Pouran
Nov 28 '14 at 22:11
1
1
$begingroup$
@Fardad: they are "topologically cyclic" in the sense that the subgroup of the Galois group generated by the Frobenius map is dense.
$endgroup$
– Qiaochu Yuan
Nov 28 '14 at 22:20
$begingroup$
@Fardad: they are "topologically cyclic" in the sense that the subgroup of the Galois group generated by the Frobenius map is dense.
$endgroup$
– Qiaochu Yuan
Nov 28 '14 at 22:20
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Below is a complete, noncircular simple proof of the result mentioned by Qiaochu that avoids invoking the high-powered structure theorem for finite abelian groups.
Theorem $ $ A finite subgroup $rm:G:$ of the multiplicative group of a field is cyclic.
Proof $ $ The proposition below yields, with $rm,m = maxord(G) = expt(G),,$ that $rm, x^m = 1,$ has $rm:#G:$ roots. Since a polynomial $rm:f:$ over a field satisfies $rm:#roots f le deg f:$ we infer that $rm: #G le m.:$ But maxorder $rm:m le #G:$ since $rm:g^{#G} = 1:$ for all $rm:g in G:$ (Lagrange). $:$ Thus $rm:m = #G = maxord(G),:$ therefore $rm:G:$ has an element of order $rm#G,:$ hence $rm:G:$ is cyclic.
$begin{eqnarray}rm{bf Proposition}qquad maxord(G) &=&,rm expt(G) text{ for a finite abelian group} G, i.e.\[.5em]
rm max { ord(g) : : g in G} &=&,rm min { n>0 : : g^n = 1 forall g in G}end{eqnarray}$
Proof $ $ By the lemma below, $rm: S, =, { ord(g) : :g in G }$ is a finite
set of naturals closed under$rm lcm$.
Hence every $rm s in S:$ is a
divisor of the max elt $rm: m $ [else $rm: lcm(s,m) > m,$],$ $ so $rm m = expt(G)$.
Lemma $ $ A finite abelian group $rm:G:$ has an lcm-closed order set, i.e. with $rm: o(X) = $ order of $rm, X$
$$rm X,Y in G Rightarrow exists Z in G: o(Z) = lcm(o(X),o(Y))$$
Proof $ $ By induction on $rm: o(X), o(Y). $ If it's $:1:$ then trivially $rm:Z = 1$. $ $ Otherwise
write $rm, o(X), =: AP,: o(Y) = BP', P'mid P = p^m > 1, $ prime $rm: p:$ coprime to $rm: A,B.$
Then $rm, o(X^P) = A, o(Y^{P'}) = B. $ By induction there's a $rm: Z:$ with $rm : o(Z) = lcm(A,B)$
thus $rm, o(X^A Z) = P lcm(A,B) = lcm(AP,BP') = lcm(o(X),o(Y)).$
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
I think the OP was asking if the (finite) extension $K/mathbb{F}_q$ is a cyclic extension, namely that $mbox{Gal}(K/mathbb{F}_q)$ is a cyclic group. Does this immediately follow from the fact that $K^times$ is a cyclic group?
$endgroup$
– Alon Amit
May 10 '11 at 16:15
$begingroup$
@Alon I've edited it to clarify that it was meant to support Qiaochu's answer.
$endgroup$
– Bill Dubuque
May 10 '11 at 18:04
5
$begingroup$
Sadly, it looks like this nice answer is destined to be one of the gems at the tail end of the voting range. To work against that, I'm voting it up.
$endgroup$
– t.b.
May 10 '11 at 19:02
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Below is a complete, noncircular simple proof of the result mentioned by Qiaochu that avoids invoking the high-powered structure theorem for finite abelian groups.
Theorem $ $ A finite subgroup $rm:G:$ of the multiplicative group of a field is cyclic.
Proof $ $ The proposition below yields, with $rm,m = maxord(G) = expt(G),,$ that $rm, x^m = 1,$ has $rm:#G:$ roots. Since a polynomial $rm:f:$ over a field satisfies $rm:#roots f le deg f:$ we infer that $rm: #G le m.:$ But maxorder $rm:m le #G:$ since $rm:g^{#G} = 1:$ for all $rm:g in G:$ (Lagrange). $:$ Thus $rm:m = #G = maxord(G),:$ therefore $rm:G:$ has an element of order $rm#G,:$ hence $rm:G:$ is cyclic.
$begin{eqnarray}rm{bf Proposition}qquad maxord(G) &=&,rm expt(G) text{ for a finite abelian group} G, i.e.\[.5em]
rm max { ord(g) : : g in G} &=&,rm min { n>0 : : g^n = 1 forall g in G}end{eqnarray}$
Proof $ $ By the lemma below, $rm: S, =, { ord(g) : :g in G }$ is a finite
set of naturals closed under$rm lcm$.
Hence every $rm s in S:$ is a
divisor of the max elt $rm: m $ [else $rm: lcm(s,m) > m,$],$ $ so $rm m = expt(G)$.
Lemma $ $ A finite abelian group $rm:G:$ has an lcm-closed order set, i.e. with $rm: o(X) = $ order of $rm, X$
$$rm X,Y in G Rightarrow exists Z in G: o(Z) = lcm(o(X),o(Y))$$
Proof $ $ By induction on $rm: o(X), o(Y). $ If it's $:1:$ then trivially $rm:Z = 1$. $ $ Otherwise
write $rm, o(X), =: AP,: o(Y) = BP', P'mid P = p^m > 1, $ prime $rm: p:$ coprime to $rm: A,B.$
Then $rm, o(X^P) = A, o(Y^{P'}) = B. $ By induction there's a $rm: Z:$ with $rm : o(Z) = lcm(A,B)$
thus $rm, o(X^A Z) = P lcm(A,B) = lcm(AP,BP') = lcm(o(X),o(Y)).$
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
I think the OP was asking if the (finite) extension $K/mathbb{F}_q$ is a cyclic extension, namely that $mbox{Gal}(K/mathbb{F}_q)$ is a cyclic group. Does this immediately follow from the fact that $K^times$ is a cyclic group?
$endgroup$
– Alon Amit
May 10 '11 at 16:15
$begingroup$
@Alon I've edited it to clarify that it was meant to support Qiaochu's answer.
$endgroup$
– Bill Dubuque
May 10 '11 at 18:04
5
$begingroup$
Sadly, it looks like this nice answer is destined to be one of the gems at the tail end of the voting range. To work against that, I'm voting it up.
$endgroup$
– t.b.
May 10 '11 at 19:02
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Below is a complete, noncircular simple proof of the result mentioned by Qiaochu that avoids invoking the high-powered structure theorem for finite abelian groups.
Theorem $ $ A finite subgroup $rm:G:$ of the multiplicative group of a field is cyclic.
Proof $ $ The proposition below yields, with $rm,m = maxord(G) = expt(G),,$ that $rm, x^m = 1,$ has $rm:#G:$ roots. Since a polynomial $rm:f:$ over a field satisfies $rm:#roots f le deg f:$ we infer that $rm: #G le m.:$ But maxorder $rm:m le #G:$ since $rm:g^{#G} = 1:$ for all $rm:g in G:$ (Lagrange). $:$ Thus $rm:m = #G = maxord(G),:$ therefore $rm:G:$ has an element of order $rm#G,:$ hence $rm:G:$ is cyclic.
$begin{eqnarray}rm{bf Proposition}qquad maxord(G) &=&,rm expt(G) text{ for a finite abelian group} G, i.e.\[.5em]
rm max { ord(g) : : g in G} &=&,rm min { n>0 : : g^n = 1 forall g in G}end{eqnarray}$
Proof $ $ By the lemma below, $rm: S, =, { ord(g) : :g in G }$ is a finite
set of naturals closed under$rm lcm$.
Hence every $rm s in S:$ is a
divisor of the max elt $rm: m $ [else $rm: lcm(s,m) > m,$],$ $ so $rm m = expt(G)$.
Lemma $ $ A finite abelian group $rm:G:$ has an lcm-closed order set, i.e. with $rm: o(X) = $ order of $rm, X$
$$rm X,Y in G Rightarrow exists Z in G: o(Z) = lcm(o(X),o(Y))$$
Proof $ $ By induction on $rm: o(X), o(Y). $ If it's $:1:$ then trivially $rm:Z = 1$. $ $ Otherwise
write $rm, o(X), =: AP,: o(Y) = BP', P'mid P = p^m > 1, $ prime $rm: p:$ coprime to $rm: A,B.$
Then $rm, o(X^P) = A, o(Y^{P'}) = B. $ By induction there's a $rm: Z:$ with $rm : o(Z) = lcm(A,B)$
thus $rm, o(X^A Z) = P lcm(A,B) = lcm(AP,BP') = lcm(o(X),o(Y)).$
$endgroup$
Below is a complete, noncircular simple proof of the result mentioned by Qiaochu that avoids invoking the high-powered structure theorem for finite abelian groups.
Theorem $ $ A finite subgroup $rm:G:$ of the multiplicative group of a field is cyclic.
Proof $ $ The proposition below yields, with $rm,m = maxord(G) = expt(G),,$ that $rm, x^m = 1,$ has $rm:#G:$ roots. Since a polynomial $rm:f:$ over a field satisfies $rm:#roots f le deg f:$ we infer that $rm: #G le m.:$ But maxorder $rm:m le #G:$ since $rm:g^{#G} = 1:$ for all $rm:g in G:$ (Lagrange). $:$ Thus $rm:m = #G = maxord(G),:$ therefore $rm:G:$ has an element of order $rm#G,:$ hence $rm:G:$ is cyclic.
$begin{eqnarray}rm{bf Proposition}qquad maxord(G) &=&,rm expt(G) text{ for a finite abelian group} G, i.e.\[.5em]
rm max { ord(g) : : g in G} &=&,rm min { n>0 : : g^n = 1 forall g in G}end{eqnarray}$
Proof $ $ By the lemma below, $rm: S, =, { ord(g) : :g in G }$ is a finite
set of naturals closed under$rm lcm$.
Hence every $rm s in S:$ is a
divisor of the max elt $rm: m $ [else $rm: lcm(s,m) > m,$],$ $ so $rm m = expt(G)$.
Lemma $ $ A finite abelian group $rm:G:$ has an lcm-closed order set, i.e. with $rm: o(X) = $ order of $rm, X$
$$rm X,Y in G Rightarrow exists Z in G: o(Z) = lcm(o(X),o(Y))$$
Proof $ $ By induction on $rm: o(X), o(Y). $ If it's $:1:$ then trivially $rm:Z = 1$. $ $ Otherwise
write $rm, o(X), =: AP,: o(Y) = BP', P'mid P = p^m > 1, $ prime $rm: p:$ coprime to $rm: A,B.$
Then $rm, o(X^P) = A, o(Y^{P'}) = B. $ By induction there's a $rm: Z:$ with $rm : o(Z) = lcm(A,B)$
thus $rm, o(X^A Z) = P lcm(A,B) = lcm(AP,BP') = lcm(o(X),o(Y)).$
edited Dec 27 '18 at 2:34
answered May 10 '11 at 15:16
Bill DubuqueBill Dubuque
211k29193647
211k29193647
3
$begingroup$
I think the OP was asking if the (finite) extension $K/mathbb{F}_q$ is a cyclic extension, namely that $mbox{Gal}(K/mathbb{F}_q)$ is a cyclic group. Does this immediately follow from the fact that $K^times$ is a cyclic group?
$endgroup$
– Alon Amit
May 10 '11 at 16:15
$begingroup$
@Alon I've edited it to clarify that it was meant to support Qiaochu's answer.
$endgroup$
– Bill Dubuque
May 10 '11 at 18:04
5
$begingroup$
Sadly, it looks like this nice answer is destined to be one of the gems at the tail end of the voting range. To work against that, I'm voting it up.
$endgroup$
– t.b.
May 10 '11 at 19:02
add a comment |
3
$begingroup$
I think the OP was asking if the (finite) extension $K/mathbb{F}_q$ is a cyclic extension, namely that $mbox{Gal}(K/mathbb{F}_q)$ is a cyclic group. Does this immediately follow from the fact that $K^times$ is a cyclic group?
$endgroup$
– Alon Amit
May 10 '11 at 16:15
$begingroup$
@Alon I've edited it to clarify that it was meant to support Qiaochu's answer.
$endgroup$
– Bill Dubuque
May 10 '11 at 18:04
5
$begingroup$
Sadly, it looks like this nice answer is destined to be one of the gems at the tail end of the voting range. To work against that, I'm voting it up.
$endgroup$
– t.b.
May 10 '11 at 19:02
3
3
$begingroup$
I think the OP was asking if the (finite) extension $K/mathbb{F}_q$ is a cyclic extension, namely that $mbox{Gal}(K/mathbb{F}_q)$ is a cyclic group. Does this immediately follow from the fact that $K^times$ is a cyclic group?
$endgroup$
– Alon Amit
May 10 '11 at 16:15
$begingroup$
I think the OP was asking if the (finite) extension $K/mathbb{F}_q$ is a cyclic extension, namely that $mbox{Gal}(K/mathbb{F}_q)$ is a cyclic group. Does this immediately follow from the fact that $K^times$ is a cyclic group?
$endgroup$
– Alon Amit
May 10 '11 at 16:15
$begingroup$
@Alon I've edited it to clarify that it was meant to support Qiaochu's answer.
$endgroup$
– Bill Dubuque
May 10 '11 at 18:04
$begingroup$
@Alon I've edited it to clarify that it was meant to support Qiaochu's answer.
$endgroup$
– Bill Dubuque
May 10 '11 at 18:04
5
5
$begingroup$
Sadly, it looks like this nice answer is destined to be one of the gems at the tail end of the voting range. To work against that, I'm voting it up.
$endgroup$
– t.b.
May 10 '11 at 19:02
$begingroup$
Sadly, it looks like this nice answer is destined to be one of the gems at the tail end of the voting range. To work against that, I'm voting it up.
$endgroup$
– t.b.
May 10 '11 at 19:02
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f38197%2fare-all-extensions-of-finite-fields-cyclic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
5
$begingroup$
Please make the body of your messages self-contained. "My books says this is true" is not a particularly informative first sentence. Titles/subject lines are no more part of the content of the message than the publisher's imprint on the spine of the book is part of the novel.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
May 10 '11 at 16:05