Cumulants vs. moments












1












$begingroup$


In high order statistics, what is the intuition for the difference between cumulants and moments? What does any of them measure and what is the intuition to use one of them over the other?



Specifically, I am following this paper, and I am trying to understand their reasoning behind using cumulants. Why did they move from $G_n$ to $C_n$ after equation [6]? What are those cross-terms that exist in the correlation case and are not present in the cumulant case?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    In high order statistics, what is the intuition for the difference between cumulants and moments? What does any of them measure and what is the intuition to use one of them over the other?



    Specifically, I am following this paper, and I am trying to understand their reasoning behind using cumulants. Why did they move from $G_n$ to $C_n$ after equation [6]? What are those cross-terms that exist in the correlation case and are not present in the cumulant case?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1


      1



      $begingroup$


      In high order statistics, what is the intuition for the difference between cumulants and moments? What does any of them measure and what is the intuition to use one of them over the other?



      Specifically, I am following this paper, and I am trying to understand their reasoning behind using cumulants. Why did they move from $G_n$ to $C_n$ after equation [6]? What are those cross-terms that exist in the correlation case and are not present in the cumulant case?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      In high order statistics, what is the intuition for the difference between cumulants and moments? What does any of them measure and what is the intuition to use one of them over the other?



      Specifically, I am following this paper, and I am trying to understand their reasoning behind using cumulants. Why did they move from $G_n$ to $C_n$ after equation [6]? What are those cross-terms that exist in the correlation case and are not present in the cumulant case?







      moment-generating-functions cumulants






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 31 '18 at 13:38







      havakok

















      asked Dec 27 '18 at 7:43









      havakokhavakok

      520215




      520215






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2





          +50







          $begingroup$

          The cumulant is the part of the moment that is not "caused" by lower order moments.



          To get intuition, consider the case where the measurements are all the same, $X_i=x$, Then the $n$th moment is $langle X^nrangle=x^n=langle Xrangle^n$ , whereas the cumulants would all be $0$ starting from $n=2$. If we have non identical measurements each moment can be written as a sum of products lower moments and a "new" term. This new term is the cumulant.



          As an example, consider the 3rd moment $<X^3>$. We write it as $$<((X-<X>)+<X>)^3>=<(X-<X>)^3+3(X-<X>)^2<X>+3(X-<X>)<X>^2+<X>^3>$$, recalling that $<X-<X>>=0$, we can write
          $$<X^3>=<(X-<X>)^3>+3<(X-<X>)^2><X>+<X>^3$$. the term $(X-<X>)^3$ cannot be written in terms of $<X>;<(X-<X>)^2>$ and is the 3 order cumulant.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$









          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @hardmath I added the 3rd moment case.
            $endgroup$
            – user617446
            Dec 31 '18 at 14:52











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3053685%2fcumulants-vs-moments%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          2





          +50







          $begingroup$

          The cumulant is the part of the moment that is not "caused" by lower order moments.



          To get intuition, consider the case where the measurements are all the same, $X_i=x$, Then the $n$th moment is $langle X^nrangle=x^n=langle Xrangle^n$ , whereas the cumulants would all be $0$ starting from $n=2$. If we have non identical measurements each moment can be written as a sum of products lower moments and a "new" term. This new term is the cumulant.



          As an example, consider the 3rd moment $<X^3>$. We write it as $$<((X-<X>)+<X>)^3>=<(X-<X>)^3+3(X-<X>)^2<X>+3(X-<X>)<X>^2+<X>^3>$$, recalling that $<X-<X>>=0$, we can write
          $$<X^3>=<(X-<X>)^3>+3<(X-<X>)^2><X>+<X>^3$$. the term $(X-<X>)^3$ cannot be written in terms of $<X>;<(X-<X>)^2>$ and is the 3 order cumulant.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$









          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @hardmath I added the 3rd moment case.
            $endgroup$
            – user617446
            Dec 31 '18 at 14:52
















          2





          +50







          $begingroup$

          The cumulant is the part of the moment that is not "caused" by lower order moments.



          To get intuition, consider the case where the measurements are all the same, $X_i=x$, Then the $n$th moment is $langle X^nrangle=x^n=langle Xrangle^n$ , whereas the cumulants would all be $0$ starting from $n=2$. If we have non identical measurements each moment can be written as a sum of products lower moments and a "new" term. This new term is the cumulant.



          As an example, consider the 3rd moment $<X^3>$. We write it as $$<((X-<X>)+<X>)^3>=<(X-<X>)^3+3(X-<X>)^2<X>+3(X-<X>)<X>^2+<X>^3>$$, recalling that $<X-<X>>=0$, we can write
          $$<X^3>=<(X-<X>)^3>+3<(X-<X>)^2><X>+<X>^3$$. the term $(X-<X>)^3$ cannot be written in terms of $<X>;<(X-<X>)^2>$ and is the 3 order cumulant.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$









          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @hardmath I added the 3rd moment case.
            $endgroup$
            – user617446
            Dec 31 '18 at 14:52














          2





          +50







          2





          +50



          2




          +50



          $begingroup$

          The cumulant is the part of the moment that is not "caused" by lower order moments.



          To get intuition, consider the case where the measurements are all the same, $X_i=x$, Then the $n$th moment is $langle X^nrangle=x^n=langle Xrangle^n$ , whereas the cumulants would all be $0$ starting from $n=2$. If we have non identical measurements each moment can be written as a sum of products lower moments and a "new" term. This new term is the cumulant.



          As an example, consider the 3rd moment $<X^3>$. We write it as $$<((X-<X>)+<X>)^3>=<(X-<X>)^3+3(X-<X>)^2<X>+3(X-<X>)<X>^2+<X>^3>$$, recalling that $<X-<X>>=0$, we can write
          $$<X^3>=<(X-<X>)^3>+3<(X-<X>)^2><X>+<X>^3$$. the term $(X-<X>)^3$ cannot be written in terms of $<X>;<(X-<X>)^2>$ and is the 3 order cumulant.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          The cumulant is the part of the moment that is not "caused" by lower order moments.



          To get intuition, consider the case where the measurements are all the same, $X_i=x$, Then the $n$th moment is $langle X^nrangle=x^n=langle Xrangle^n$ , whereas the cumulants would all be $0$ starting from $n=2$. If we have non identical measurements each moment can be written as a sum of products lower moments and a "new" term. This new term is the cumulant.



          As an example, consider the 3rd moment $<X^3>$. We write it as $$<((X-<X>)+<X>)^3>=<(X-<X>)^3+3(X-<X>)^2<X>+3(X-<X>)<X>^2+<X>^3>$$, recalling that $<X-<X>>=0$, we can write
          $$<X^3>=<(X-<X>)^3>+3<(X-<X>)^2><X>+<X>^3$$. the term $(X-<X>)^3$ cannot be written in terms of $<X>;<(X-<X>)^2>$ and is the 3 order cumulant.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Dec 31 '18 at 14:51

























          answered Dec 31 '18 at 13:10









          user617446user617446

          4443




          4443








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @hardmath I added the 3rd moment case.
            $endgroup$
            – user617446
            Dec 31 '18 at 14:52














          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @hardmath I added the 3rd moment case.
            $endgroup$
            – user617446
            Dec 31 '18 at 14:52








          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          @hardmath I added the 3rd moment case.
          $endgroup$
          – user617446
          Dec 31 '18 at 14:52




          $begingroup$
          @hardmath I added the 3rd moment case.
          $endgroup$
          – user617446
          Dec 31 '18 at 14:52


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3053685%2fcumulants-vs-moments%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Quarter-circle Tiles

          build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

          Mont Emei