$pi^4 + pi^5 approx e^6$ is anything special going on here?












23












$begingroup$


Saw it in the news:
$$(pi^4 + pi^5)^{Largefrac16} approx 2.71828180861$$



Is this just pigeon-hole?





DISCUSSION: counterfeit $e$ using $pi$'s



Given enough integers and $pi$'s we can approximate just about any number. In formal mathematical language we say this set is dense in the real numbers:



$$ overline{ mathbb{Z}[pi]} = mathbb{R}$$



This is only part of the story since it doesn't tell us how big our integers have to be in order to approximate the constant of our choosing? Maybe we can quantify this with a notion of density?



$$ mu_N([a,b]) = frac{# |{ m + n pi: -N leq m,n leq N }cap[a,b]|}{N^2} $$



The example above works because of the constants 4, 5 and 6.

We can focus on a particular constant and ask how much effort it takes to approximate a given constant:



$$ big{ (m,n)in mathbb{Z}^2: big| m + n pi - alpha big|< epsilon big} $$



In our case we need to incorporate for square roots, cube roots and higher.





Generalization How closely can we approximate $e$ using powers of $pi$ and $n$-th roots?



$$displaystyle ( a + bpi )^{1/p} approx e $$



Here $0 leq |a|,|b|,p leq 10$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 13




    $begingroup$
    A good approximation of order approx. $;10^{-7};$ ....that's all. There are literally thousands of different such approximations to all kinds of numbers.
    $endgroup$
    – DonAntonio
    Jun 14 '14 at 11:07






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    This is most likely a coincidence, as the approximation is explained well by a long-known astonishing coincidence $pi approx e^pi - 20$. For example, $log(pi^4 + pi^5) = 4log(pi)+log(1+pi)$ and applying the above with the crude estimation $exp(pi) approx 23$ in mind, one has $log(pi) approx log(exp(pi)-20) approx pi + log(1-20/exp(pi)) approx pi + log(3/23)$ and similarly $log(1+pi) approx log(exp(pi) - 19) approx pi + log(4/23)$. Adding up, we have $5pi + log(3^4/23^4cdot 4/23) approx 5.811$ which is much close to $6$.
    $endgroup$
    – Balarka Sen
    Jun 14 '14 at 12:23








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Is there a question here?
    $endgroup$
    – Alexander Gruber
    Jun 14 '14 at 12:48






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    @johnmangual I see a question mark but the words behind it do not make sense. Please clarify your meaning of "is this pigeonhole" as requested.
    $endgroup$
    – Alexander Gruber
    Jun 14 '14 at 16:10






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    $piapproxdfrac{ln(640320^3+744)}{sqrt{163}}$ , with a precision of $30$ exact decimals. Discovered independently by both Charles Hermite and Srinivasa Ramanujan. Based on the fact that $e^{pisqrt H}$ is an almost integer when H is a Heegner number.
    $endgroup$
    – Lucian
    Jun 14 '14 at 17:23
















23












$begingroup$


Saw it in the news:
$$(pi^4 + pi^5)^{Largefrac16} approx 2.71828180861$$



Is this just pigeon-hole?





DISCUSSION: counterfeit $e$ using $pi$'s



Given enough integers and $pi$'s we can approximate just about any number. In formal mathematical language we say this set is dense in the real numbers:



$$ overline{ mathbb{Z}[pi]} = mathbb{R}$$



This is only part of the story since it doesn't tell us how big our integers have to be in order to approximate the constant of our choosing? Maybe we can quantify this with a notion of density?



$$ mu_N([a,b]) = frac{# |{ m + n pi: -N leq m,n leq N }cap[a,b]|}{N^2} $$



The example above works because of the constants 4, 5 and 6.

We can focus on a particular constant and ask how much effort it takes to approximate a given constant:



$$ big{ (m,n)in mathbb{Z}^2: big| m + n pi - alpha big|< epsilon big} $$



In our case we need to incorporate for square roots, cube roots and higher.





Generalization How closely can we approximate $e$ using powers of $pi$ and $n$-th roots?



$$displaystyle ( a + bpi )^{1/p} approx e $$



Here $0 leq |a|,|b|,p leq 10$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 13




    $begingroup$
    A good approximation of order approx. $;10^{-7};$ ....that's all. There are literally thousands of different such approximations to all kinds of numbers.
    $endgroup$
    – DonAntonio
    Jun 14 '14 at 11:07






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    This is most likely a coincidence, as the approximation is explained well by a long-known astonishing coincidence $pi approx e^pi - 20$. For example, $log(pi^4 + pi^5) = 4log(pi)+log(1+pi)$ and applying the above with the crude estimation $exp(pi) approx 23$ in mind, one has $log(pi) approx log(exp(pi)-20) approx pi + log(1-20/exp(pi)) approx pi + log(3/23)$ and similarly $log(1+pi) approx log(exp(pi) - 19) approx pi + log(4/23)$. Adding up, we have $5pi + log(3^4/23^4cdot 4/23) approx 5.811$ which is much close to $6$.
    $endgroup$
    – Balarka Sen
    Jun 14 '14 at 12:23








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Is there a question here?
    $endgroup$
    – Alexander Gruber
    Jun 14 '14 at 12:48






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    @johnmangual I see a question mark but the words behind it do not make sense. Please clarify your meaning of "is this pigeonhole" as requested.
    $endgroup$
    – Alexander Gruber
    Jun 14 '14 at 16:10






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    $piapproxdfrac{ln(640320^3+744)}{sqrt{163}}$ , with a precision of $30$ exact decimals. Discovered independently by both Charles Hermite and Srinivasa Ramanujan. Based on the fact that $e^{pisqrt H}$ is an almost integer when H is a Heegner number.
    $endgroup$
    – Lucian
    Jun 14 '14 at 17:23














23












23








23


5



$begingroup$


Saw it in the news:
$$(pi^4 + pi^5)^{Largefrac16} approx 2.71828180861$$



Is this just pigeon-hole?





DISCUSSION: counterfeit $e$ using $pi$'s



Given enough integers and $pi$'s we can approximate just about any number. In formal mathematical language we say this set is dense in the real numbers:



$$ overline{ mathbb{Z}[pi]} = mathbb{R}$$



This is only part of the story since it doesn't tell us how big our integers have to be in order to approximate the constant of our choosing? Maybe we can quantify this with a notion of density?



$$ mu_N([a,b]) = frac{# |{ m + n pi: -N leq m,n leq N }cap[a,b]|}{N^2} $$



The example above works because of the constants 4, 5 and 6.

We can focus on a particular constant and ask how much effort it takes to approximate a given constant:



$$ big{ (m,n)in mathbb{Z}^2: big| m + n pi - alpha big|< epsilon big} $$



In our case we need to incorporate for square roots, cube roots and higher.





Generalization How closely can we approximate $e$ using powers of $pi$ and $n$-th roots?



$$displaystyle ( a + bpi )^{1/p} approx e $$



Here $0 leq |a|,|b|,p leq 10$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Saw it in the news:
$$(pi^4 + pi^5)^{Largefrac16} approx 2.71828180861$$



Is this just pigeon-hole?





DISCUSSION: counterfeit $e$ using $pi$'s



Given enough integers and $pi$'s we can approximate just about any number. In formal mathematical language we say this set is dense in the real numbers:



$$ overline{ mathbb{Z}[pi]} = mathbb{R}$$



This is only part of the story since it doesn't tell us how big our integers have to be in order to approximate the constant of our choosing? Maybe we can quantify this with a notion of density?



$$ mu_N([a,b]) = frac{# |{ m + n pi: -N leq m,n leq N }cap[a,b]|}{N^2} $$



The example above works because of the constants 4, 5 and 6.

We can focus on a particular constant and ask how much effort it takes to approximate a given constant:



$$ big{ (m,n)in mathbb{Z}^2: big| m + n pi - alpha big|< epsilon big} $$



In our case we need to incorporate for square roots, cube roots and higher.





Generalization How closely can we approximate $e$ using powers of $pi$ and $n$-th roots?



$$displaystyle ( a + bpi )^{1/p} approx e $$



Here $0 leq |a|,|b|,p leq 10$







exponential-function approximation pi constants diophantine-approximation






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 27 '18 at 5:05









Martin Sleziak

44.7k10119272




44.7k10119272










asked Jun 14 '14 at 11:02









cactus314cactus314

15.5k42269




15.5k42269








  • 13




    $begingroup$
    A good approximation of order approx. $;10^{-7};$ ....that's all. There are literally thousands of different such approximations to all kinds of numbers.
    $endgroup$
    – DonAntonio
    Jun 14 '14 at 11:07






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    This is most likely a coincidence, as the approximation is explained well by a long-known astonishing coincidence $pi approx e^pi - 20$. For example, $log(pi^4 + pi^5) = 4log(pi)+log(1+pi)$ and applying the above with the crude estimation $exp(pi) approx 23$ in mind, one has $log(pi) approx log(exp(pi)-20) approx pi + log(1-20/exp(pi)) approx pi + log(3/23)$ and similarly $log(1+pi) approx log(exp(pi) - 19) approx pi + log(4/23)$. Adding up, we have $5pi + log(3^4/23^4cdot 4/23) approx 5.811$ which is much close to $6$.
    $endgroup$
    – Balarka Sen
    Jun 14 '14 at 12:23








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Is there a question here?
    $endgroup$
    – Alexander Gruber
    Jun 14 '14 at 12:48






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    @johnmangual I see a question mark but the words behind it do not make sense. Please clarify your meaning of "is this pigeonhole" as requested.
    $endgroup$
    – Alexander Gruber
    Jun 14 '14 at 16:10






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    $piapproxdfrac{ln(640320^3+744)}{sqrt{163}}$ , with a precision of $30$ exact decimals. Discovered independently by both Charles Hermite and Srinivasa Ramanujan. Based on the fact that $e^{pisqrt H}$ is an almost integer when H is a Heegner number.
    $endgroup$
    – Lucian
    Jun 14 '14 at 17:23














  • 13




    $begingroup$
    A good approximation of order approx. $;10^{-7};$ ....that's all. There are literally thousands of different such approximations to all kinds of numbers.
    $endgroup$
    – DonAntonio
    Jun 14 '14 at 11:07






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    This is most likely a coincidence, as the approximation is explained well by a long-known astonishing coincidence $pi approx e^pi - 20$. For example, $log(pi^4 + pi^5) = 4log(pi)+log(1+pi)$ and applying the above with the crude estimation $exp(pi) approx 23$ in mind, one has $log(pi) approx log(exp(pi)-20) approx pi + log(1-20/exp(pi)) approx pi + log(3/23)$ and similarly $log(1+pi) approx log(exp(pi) - 19) approx pi + log(4/23)$. Adding up, we have $5pi + log(3^4/23^4cdot 4/23) approx 5.811$ which is much close to $6$.
    $endgroup$
    – Balarka Sen
    Jun 14 '14 at 12:23








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Is there a question here?
    $endgroup$
    – Alexander Gruber
    Jun 14 '14 at 12:48






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    @johnmangual I see a question mark but the words behind it do not make sense. Please clarify your meaning of "is this pigeonhole" as requested.
    $endgroup$
    – Alexander Gruber
    Jun 14 '14 at 16:10






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    $piapproxdfrac{ln(640320^3+744)}{sqrt{163}}$ , with a precision of $30$ exact decimals. Discovered independently by both Charles Hermite and Srinivasa Ramanujan. Based on the fact that $e^{pisqrt H}$ is an almost integer when H is a Heegner number.
    $endgroup$
    – Lucian
    Jun 14 '14 at 17:23








13




13




$begingroup$
A good approximation of order approx. $;10^{-7};$ ....that's all. There are literally thousands of different such approximations to all kinds of numbers.
$endgroup$
– DonAntonio
Jun 14 '14 at 11:07




$begingroup$
A good approximation of order approx. $;10^{-7};$ ....that's all. There are literally thousands of different such approximations to all kinds of numbers.
$endgroup$
– DonAntonio
Jun 14 '14 at 11:07




4




4




$begingroup$
This is most likely a coincidence, as the approximation is explained well by a long-known astonishing coincidence $pi approx e^pi - 20$. For example, $log(pi^4 + pi^5) = 4log(pi)+log(1+pi)$ and applying the above with the crude estimation $exp(pi) approx 23$ in mind, one has $log(pi) approx log(exp(pi)-20) approx pi + log(1-20/exp(pi)) approx pi + log(3/23)$ and similarly $log(1+pi) approx log(exp(pi) - 19) approx pi + log(4/23)$. Adding up, we have $5pi + log(3^4/23^4cdot 4/23) approx 5.811$ which is much close to $6$.
$endgroup$
– Balarka Sen
Jun 14 '14 at 12:23






$begingroup$
This is most likely a coincidence, as the approximation is explained well by a long-known astonishing coincidence $pi approx e^pi - 20$. For example, $log(pi^4 + pi^5) = 4log(pi)+log(1+pi)$ and applying the above with the crude estimation $exp(pi) approx 23$ in mind, one has $log(pi) approx log(exp(pi)-20) approx pi + log(1-20/exp(pi)) approx pi + log(3/23)$ and similarly $log(1+pi) approx log(exp(pi) - 19) approx pi + log(4/23)$. Adding up, we have $5pi + log(3^4/23^4cdot 4/23) approx 5.811$ which is much close to $6$.
$endgroup$
– Balarka Sen
Jun 14 '14 at 12:23






3




3




$begingroup$
Is there a question here?
$endgroup$
– Alexander Gruber
Jun 14 '14 at 12:48




$begingroup$
Is there a question here?
$endgroup$
– Alexander Gruber
Jun 14 '14 at 12:48




5




5




$begingroup$
@johnmangual I see a question mark but the words behind it do not make sense. Please clarify your meaning of "is this pigeonhole" as requested.
$endgroup$
– Alexander Gruber
Jun 14 '14 at 16:10




$begingroup$
@johnmangual I see a question mark but the words behind it do not make sense. Please clarify your meaning of "is this pigeonhole" as requested.
$endgroup$
– Alexander Gruber
Jun 14 '14 at 16:10




3




3




$begingroup$
$piapproxdfrac{ln(640320^3+744)}{sqrt{163}}$ , with a precision of $30$ exact decimals. Discovered independently by both Charles Hermite and Srinivasa Ramanujan. Based on the fact that $e^{pisqrt H}$ is an almost integer when H is a Heegner number.
$endgroup$
– Lucian
Jun 14 '14 at 17:23




$begingroup$
$piapproxdfrac{ln(640320^3+744)}{sqrt{163}}$ , with a precision of $30$ exact decimals. Discovered independently by both Charles Hermite and Srinivasa Ramanujan. Based on the fact that $e^{pisqrt H}$ is an almost integer when H is a Heegner number.
$endgroup$
– Lucian
Jun 14 '14 at 17:23










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

Well known approximations for $pi$, $pi^2$ and $pi^3$ can be related to the question.



$$e^6 approx 403 = 13·31 = (3+10)·31 approx left(pi+pi^2right)pi^3= pi^4+pi^5$$



The approximations $pi approx 3$ and $pi^2 approx 10$ have similar absolute errors with opposite sign so the combination $pi+pi^2 approx 13$ is more precise. The largest root of the polynomial $x^2+x-13$ is $frac{sqrt{53}-1}{2}approx 3.140$, which approximates $pi$ with an accuracy between that of $sqrt{10}$ (one digit) and $31^frac{1}{3}$ (three digits).






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    this is the right idea. i think the best way is to use Poisson summation and truncate. usually one side or the other converges quickly
    $endgroup$
    – cactus314
    Apr 15 '17 at 14:27






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Do you mean that there is a series $$left(frac{e^3}{pi^2}right)^2 = sum_{n=0}^{infty} k_npi^n$$ with $k_0=k_1=1$ and the other $k_n$ very small?
    $endgroup$
    – Jaume Oliver Lafont
    Apr 15 '17 at 15:30













Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f833800%2fpi4-pi5-approx-e6-is-anything-special-going-on-here%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









4












$begingroup$

Well known approximations for $pi$, $pi^2$ and $pi^3$ can be related to the question.



$$e^6 approx 403 = 13·31 = (3+10)·31 approx left(pi+pi^2right)pi^3= pi^4+pi^5$$



The approximations $pi approx 3$ and $pi^2 approx 10$ have similar absolute errors with opposite sign so the combination $pi+pi^2 approx 13$ is more precise. The largest root of the polynomial $x^2+x-13$ is $frac{sqrt{53}-1}{2}approx 3.140$, which approximates $pi$ with an accuracy between that of $sqrt{10}$ (one digit) and $31^frac{1}{3}$ (three digits).






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    this is the right idea. i think the best way is to use Poisson summation and truncate. usually one side or the other converges quickly
    $endgroup$
    – cactus314
    Apr 15 '17 at 14:27






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Do you mean that there is a series $$left(frac{e^3}{pi^2}right)^2 = sum_{n=0}^{infty} k_npi^n$$ with $k_0=k_1=1$ and the other $k_n$ very small?
    $endgroup$
    – Jaume Oliver Lafont
    Apr 15 '17 at 15:30


















4












$begingroup$

Well known approximations for $pi$, $pi^2$ and $pi^3$ can be related to the question.



$$e^6 approx 403 = 13·31 = (3+10)·31 approx left(pi+pi^2right)pi^3= pi^4+pi^5$$



The approximations $pi approx 3$ and $pi^2 approx 10$ have similar absolute errors with opposite sign so the combination $pi+pi^2 approx 13$ is more precise. The largest root of the polynomial $x^2+x-13$ is $frac{sqrt{53}-1}{2}approx 3.140$, which approximates $pi$ with an accuracy between that of $sqrt{10}$ (one digit) and $31^frac{1}{3}$ (three digits).






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    this is the right idea. i think the best way is to use Poisson summation and truncate. usually one side or the other converges quickly
    $endgroup$
    – cactus314
    Apr 15 '17 at 14:27






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Do you mean that there is a series $$left(frac{e^3}{pi^2}right)^2 = sum_{n=0}^{infty} k_npi^n$$ with $k_0=k_1=1$ and the other $k_n$ very small?
    $endgroup$
    – Jaume Oliver Lafont
    Apr 15 '17 at 15:30
















4












4








4





$begingroup$

Well known approximations for $pi$, $pi^2$ and $pi^3$ can be related to the question.



$$e^6 approx 403 = 13·31 = (3+10)·31 approx left(pi+pi^2right)pi^3= pi^4+pi^5$$



The approximations $pi approx 3$ and $pi^2 approx 10$ have similar absolute errors with opposite sign so the combination $pi+pi^2 approx 13$ is more precise. The largest root of the polynomial $x^2+x-13$ is $frac{sqrt{53}-1}{2}approx 3.140$, which approximates $pi$ with an accuracy between that of $sqrt{10}$ (one digit) and $31^frac{1}{3}$ (three digits).






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Well known approximations for $pi$, $pi^2$ and $pi^3$ can be related to the question.



$$e^6 approx 403 = 13·31 = (3+10)·31 approx left(pi+pi^2right)pi^3= pi^4+pi^5$$



The approximations $pi approx 3$ and $pi^2 approx 10$ have similar absolute errors with opposite sign so the combination $pi+pi^2 approx 13$ is more precise. The largest root of the polynomial $x^2+x-13$ is $frac{sqrt{53}-1}{2}approx 3.140$, which approximates $pi$ with an accuracy between that of $sqrt{10}$ (one digit) and $31^frac{1}{3}$ (three digits).







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Jan 29 at 16:58

























answered Apr 15 '17 at 8:48









Jaume Oliver LafontJaume Oliver Lafont

3,09911033




3,09911033












  • $begingroup$
    this is the right idea. i think the best way is to use Poisson summation and truncate. usually one side or the other converges quickly
    $endgroup$
    – cactus314
    Apr 15 '17 at 14:27






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Do you mean that there is a series $$left(frac{e^3}{pi^2}right)^2 = sum_{n=0}^{infty} k_npi^n$$ with $k_0=k_1=1$ and the other $k_n$ very small?
    $endgroup$
    – Jaume Oliver Lafont
    Apr 15 '17 at 15:30




















  • $begingroup$
    this is the right idea. i think the best way is to use Poisson summation and truncate. usually one side or the other converges quickly
    $endgroup$
    – cactus314
    Apr 15 '17 at 14:27






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Do you mean that there is a series $$left(frac{e^3}{pi^2}right)^2 = sum_{n=0}^{infty} k_npi^n$$ with $k_0=k_1=1$ and the other $k_n$ very small?
    $endgroup$
    – Jaume Oliver Lafont
    Apr 15 '17 at 15:30


















$begingroup$
this is the right idea. i think the best way is to use Poisson summation and truncate. usually one side or the other converges quickly
$endgroup$
– cactus314
Apr 15 '17 at 14:27




$begingroup$
this is the right idea. i think the best way is to use Poisson summation and truncate. usually one side or the other converges quickly
$endgroup$
– cactus314
Apr 15 '17 at 14:27




1




1




$begingroup$
Do you mean that there is a series $$left(frac{e^3}{pi^2}right)^2 = sum_{n=0}^{infty} k_npi^n$$ with $k_0=k_1=1$ and the other $k_n$ very small?
$endgroup$
– Jaume Oliver Lafont
Apr 15 '17 at 15:30






$begingroup$
Do you mean that there is a series $$left(frac{e^3}{pi^2}right)^2 = sum_{n=0}^{infty} k_npi^n$$ with $k_0=k_1=1$ and the other $k_n$ very small?
$endgroup$
– Jaume Oliver Lafont
Apr 15 '17 at 15:30




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f833800%2fpi4-pi5-approx-e6-is-anything-special-going-on-here%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Ellipse (mathématiques)

Quarter-circle Tiles

Mont Emei