Can $3p^4-3p^2+1$ be square number?












2












$begingroup$


I know $4p^4+1$ can't be square number, cause $4p^4<4p^4+1<4p^4+4p^2+1$ for all natural number p.
But I don't know the way to prove $3p^4-3p^2+1$ can(not) be square number. Is there a well known way to prove it?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    $p = 1$ is a square number.
    $endgroup$
    – Toby Mak
    Dec 20 '18 at 11:14








  • 5




    $begingroup$
    PEOPLE, please stop using $p$ for natural number! Usualy it is $n$ for natural and $p$ for prime. I did whole analisys for nothing.
    $endgroup$
    – greedoid
    Dec 20 '18 at 11:33






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You must be fun at parties.
    $endgroup$
    – Lucas Henrique
    Dec 20 '18 at 11:47










  • $begingroup$
    @LucasHenrique Who are you reffering to and what does that have with a math?
    $endgroup$
    – greedoid
    Dec 20 '18 at 12:37
















2












$begingroup$


I know $4p^4+1$ can't be square number, cause $4p^4<4p^4+1<4p^4+4p^2+1$ for all natural number p.
But I don't know the way to prove $3p^4-3p^2+1$ can(not) be square number. Is there a well known way to prove it?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    $p = 1$ is a square number.
    $endgroup$
    – Toby Mak
    Dec 20 '18 at 11:14








  • 5




    $begingroup$
    PEOPLE, please stop using $p$ for natural number! Usualy it is $n$ for natural and $p$ for prime. I did whole analisys for nothing.
    $endgroup$
    – greedoid
    Dec 20 '18 at 11:33






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You must be fun at parties.
    $endgroup$
    – Lucas Henrique
    Dec 20 '18 at 11:47










  • $begingroup$
    @LucasHenrique Who are you reffering to and what does that have with a math?
    $endgroup$
    – greedoid
    Dec 20 '18 at 12:37














2












2








2





$begingroup$


I know $4p^4+1$ can't be square number, cause $4p^4<4p^4+1<4p^4+4p^2+1$ for all natural number p.
But I don't know the way to prove $3p^4-3p^2+1$ can(not) be square number. Is there a well known way to prove it?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I know $4p^4+1$ can't be square number, cause $4p^4<4p^4+1<4p^4+4p^2+1$ for all natural number p.
But I don't know the way to prove $3p^4-3p^2+1$ can(not) be square number. Is there a well known way to prove it?







elementary-number-theory diophantine-equations






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 20 '18 at 11:33









greedoid

42.9k1153105




42.9k1153105










asked Dec 20 '18 at 11:11









eandpiandieandpiandi

322




322








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    $p = 1$ is a square number.
    $endgroup$
    – Toby Mak
    Dec 20 '18 at 11:14








  • 5




    $begingroup$
    PEOPLE, please stop using $p$ for natural number! Usualy it is $n$ for natural and $p$ for prime. I did whole analisys for nothing.
    $endgroup$
    – greedoid
    Dec 20 '18 at 11:33






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You must be fun at parties.
    $endgroup$
    – Lucas Henrique
    Dec 20 '18 at 11:47










  • $begingroup$
    @LucasHenrique Who are you reffering to and what does that have with a math?
    $endgroup$
    – greedoid
    Dec 20 '18 at 12:37














  • 3




    $begingroup$
    $p = 1$ is a square number.
    $endgroup$
    – Toby Mak
    Dec 20 '18 at 11:14








  • 5




    $begingroup$
    PEOPLE, please stop using $p$ for natural number! Usualy it is $n$ for natural and $p$ for prime. I did whole analisys for nothing.
    $endgroup$
    – greedoid
    Dec 20 '18 at 11:33






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You must be fun at parties.
    $endgroup$
    – Lucas Henrique
    Dec 20 '18 at 11:47










  • $begingroup$
    @LucasHenrique Who are you reffering to and what does that have with a math?
    $endgroup$
    – greedoid
    Dec 20 '18 at 12:37








3




3




$begingroup$
$p = 1$ is a square number.
$endgroup$
– Toby Mak
Dec 20 '18 at 11:14






$begingroup$
$p = 1$ is a square number.
$endgroup$
– Toby Mak
Dec 20 '18 at 11:14






5




5




$begingroup$
PEOPLE, please stop using $p$ for natural number! Usualy it is $n$ for natural and $p$ for prime. I did whole analisys for nothing.
$endgroup$
– greedoid
Dec 20 '18 at 11:33




$begingroup$
PEOPLE, please stop using $p$ for natural number! Usualy it is $n$ for natural and $p$ for prime. I did whole analisys for nothing.
$endgroup$
– greedoid
Dec 20 '18 at 11:33




1




1




$begingroup$
You must be fun at parties.
$endgroup$
– Lucas Henrique
Dec 20 '18 at 11:47




$begingroup$
You must be fun at parties.
$endgroup$
– Lucas Henrique
Dec 20 '18 at 11:47












$begingroup$
@LucasHenrique Who are you reffering to and what does that have with a math?
$endgroup$
– greedoid
Dec 20 '18 at 12:37




$begingroup$
@LucasHenrique Who are you reffering to and what does that have with a math?
$endgroup$
– greedoid
Dec 20 '18 at 12:37










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

Partial solution if $p$ is prime.



Write $$3p^4-3p^2+1=n^2implies 3p^2(p^2-1) = (n-1)(n+1)$$



If $pne 2$ (which is not a solution) then $p^2mid n-1$ or $p^2mid n+1 $



First case: If $p^2mid n-1$ then $n+1mid 3p^2-3$ so $ n-1= p^2k$ and $n+1leq 3p^2-3$.



If $kgeq 3$ then $$3p^2-3geq n+1 >n-1 geq 3p^2$$ which is impossible. So $kleq 2$



$bullet$ If $k=2$ then $n= 2p^2+1$ so $$2p^2+2mid 3p^2-3 implies 2p^2+2mid 2(3p^2-3)-3(2p^2+2) = -12$$



So $p^2+1mid 6 implies p^2+1in {1,2,3,6}$ which is impssible.



$bullet$ If $k=1$ then $n= p^2+1$ so $$p^2+2mid 3p^2-3 implies p^2+2mid (3p^2-3)-3(p^2+2) =-9 $$



So $p^2+2mid 9 implies p^2+2in {1,3,9}$ which is impossible again.



Second case: If $p^2mid n+1$ then $n-1mid 3p^2-3$ so $ n+1= p^2k$ and $n-1leq 3p^2-3$.



Again, if $kgeq 3$ then $$3p^2-3geq n-1 = n+1-2geq 3p^2-2$$ which is impossible. So $kleq 2$



$bullet$ If $k=2$ then $n= 2p^2-1$ so $2p^2-2mid 3p^2-3$ which is impossible.



$bullet$ If $k=1$ then $n= p^2-1$ so $$p^2-2mid 3p^2-3 implies p^2-2mid (3p^2-3)-3(p^2-2) =3 $$



So $p^2-2mid 3 implies p^2-2in {-1,1,3}$ which is impossible again.



So the answer is negative if $p$ is prime.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    what if p is a natural number? Isn't there any way to prove it?
    $endgroup$
    – eandpiandi
    Dec 20 '18 at 12:04



















0












$begingroup$

Hint about method:



$3m^2 - 3m + 1 = n^2$ for any n $in$ Natural, for $p^2 = m$.



$$3m^2 - 3m + 1 - n^2 = 0$$
$$implies m = frac {3 +sqrt{12n^2-3}}6$$
$$implies p^2 = frac {3 +sqrt{12n^2-3}}6$$ or
$$implies p^2 = frac {3 -sqrt{12n^2-3}}6$$



Now you can just make logical comments yourself about this is valid for above given constraints or not, and make out a bit about the equation.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks, I couldn't spot that mistake.
    $endgroup$
    – PradyumanDixit
    Dec 20 '18 at 12:17



















0












$begingroup$

You can compare it with general formula for Pythagorean triples: $(p^2-k^2)^2+(2pk)^2=(p^2+k^2)^2$, we have: $(p^2-1)^2+p^2(2p^2-1)$, here $k=1$ and second term must be $(2p)^2$, which is not, so second term is not competent with that of general formula and your tri-nomial can not be square.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3047428%2fcan-3p4-3p21-be-square-number%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2












    $begingroup$

    Partial solution if $p$ is prime.



    Write $$3p^4-3p^2+1=n^2implies 3p^2(p^2-1) = (n-1)(n+1)$$



    If $pne 2$ (which is not a solution) then $p^2mid n-1$ or $p^2mid n+1 $



    First case: If $p^2mid n-1$ then $n+1mid 3p^2-3$ so $ n-1= p^2k$ and $n+1leq 3p^2-3$.



    If $kgeq 3$ then $$3p^2-3geq n+1 >n-1 geq 3p^2$$ which is impossible. So $kleq 2$



    $bullet$ If $k=2$ then $n= 2p^2+1$ so $$2p^2+2mid 3p^2-3 implies 2p^2+2mid 2(3p^2-3)-3(2p^2+2) = -12$$



    So $p^2+1mid 6 implies p^2+1in {1,2,3,6}$ which is impssible.



    $bullet$ If $k=1$ then $n= p^2+1$ so $$p^2+2mid 3p^2-3 implies p^2+2mid (3p^2-3)-3(p^2+2) =-9 $$



    So $p^2+2mid 9 implies p^2+2in {1,3,9}$ which is impossible again.



    Second case: If $p^2mid n+1$ then $n-1mid 3p^2-3$ so $ n+1= p^2k$ and $n-1leq 3p^2-3$.



    Again, if $kgeq 3$ then $$3p^2-3geq n-1 = n+1-2geq 3p^2-2$$ which is impossible. So $kleq 2$



    $bullet$ If $k=2$ then $n= 2p^2-1$ so $2p^2-2mid 3p^2-3$ which is impossible.



    $bullet$ If $k=1$ then $n= p^2-1$ so $$p^2-2mid 3p^2-3 implies p^2-2mid (3p^2-3)-3(p^2-2) =3 $$



    So $p^2-2mid 3 implies p^2-2in {-1,1,3}$ which is impossible again.



    So the answer is negative if $p$ is prime.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      what if p is a natural number? Isn't there any way to prove it?
      $endgroup$
      – eandpiandi
      Dec 20 '18 at 12:04
















    2












    $begingroup$

    Partial solution if $p$ is prime.



    Write $$3p^4-3p^2+1=n^2implies 3p^2(p^2-1) = (n-1)(n+1)$$



    If $pne 2$ (which is not a solution) then $p^2mid n-1$ or $p^2mid n+1 $



    First case: If $p^2mid n-1$ then $n+1mid 3p^2-3$ so $ n-1= p^2k$ and $n+1leq 3p^2-3$.



    If $kgeq 3$ then $$3p^2-3geq n+1 >n-1 geq 3p^2$$ which is impossible. So $kleq 2$



    $bullet$ If $k=2$ then $n= 2p^2+1$ so $$2p^2+2mid 3p^2-3 implies 2p^2+2mid 2(3p^2-3)-3(2p^2+2) = -12$$



    So $p^2+1mid 6 implies p^2+1in {1,2,3,6}$ which is impssible.



    $bullet$ If $k=1$ then $n= p^2+1$ so $$p^2+2mid 3p^2-3 implies p^2+2mid (3p^2-3)-3(p^2+2) =-9 $$



    So $p^2+2mid 9 implies p^2+2in {1,3,9}$ which is impossible again.



    Second case: If $p^2mid n+1$ then $n-1mid 3p^2-3$ so $ n+1= p^2k$ and $n-1leq 3p^2-3$.



    Again, if $kgeq 3$ then $$3p^2-3geq n-1 = n+1-2geq 3p^2-2$$ which is impossible. So $kleq 2$



    $bullet$ If $k=2$ then $n= 2p^2-1$ so $2p^2-2mid 3p^2-3$ which is impossible.



    $bullet$ If $k=1$ then $n= p^2-1$ so $$p^2-2mid 3p^2-3 implies p^2-2mid (3p^2-3)-3(p^2-2) =3 $$



    So $p^2-2mid 3 implies p^2-2in {-1,1,3}$ which is impossible again.



    So the answer is negative if $p$ is prime.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      what if p is a natural number? Isn't there any way to prove it?
      $endgroup$
      – eandpiandi
      Dec 20 '18 at 12:04














    2












    2








    2





    $begingroup$

    Partial solution if $p$ is prime.



    Write $$3p^4-3p^2+1=n^2implies 3p^2(p^2-1) = (n-1)(n+1)$$



    If $pne 2$ (which is not a solution) then $p^2mid n-1$ or $p^2mid n+1 $



    First case: If $p^2mid n-1$ then $n+1mid 3p^2-3$ so $ n-1= p^2k$ and $n+1leq 3p^2-3$.



    If $kgeq 3$ then $$3p^2-3geq n+1 >n-1 geq 3p^2$$ which is impossible. So $kleq 2$



    $bullet$ If $k=2$ then $n= 2p^2+1$ so $$2p^2+2mid 3p^2-3 implies 2p^2+2mid 2(3p^2-3)-3(2p^2+2) = -12$$



    So $p^2+1mid 6 implies p^2+1in {1,2,3,6}$ which is impssible.



    $bullet$ If $k=1$ then $n= p^2+1$ so $$p^2+2mid 3p^2-3 implies p^2+2mid (3p^2-3)-3(p^2+2) =-9 $$



    So $p^2+2mid 9 implies p^2+2in {1,3,9}$ which is impossible again.



    Second case: If $p^2mid n+1$ then $n-1mid 3p^2-3$ so $ n+1= p^2k$ and $n-1leq 3p^2-3$.



    Again, if $kgeq 3$ then $$3p^2-3geq n-1 = n+1-2geq 3p^2-2$$ which is impossible. So $kleq 2$



    $bullet$ If $k=2$ then $n= 2p^2-1$ so $2p^2-2mid 3p^2-3$ which is impossible.



    $bullet$ If $k=1$ then $n= p^2-1$ so $$p^2-2mid 3p^2-3 implies p^2-2mid (3p^2-3)-3(p^2-2) =3 $$



    So $p^2-2mid 3 implies p^2-2in {-1,1,3}$ which is impossible again.



    So the answer is negative if $p$ is prime.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    Partial solution if $p$ is prime.



    Write $$3p^4-3p^2+1=n^2implies 3p^2(p^2-1) = (n-1)(n+1)$$



    If $pne 2$ (which is not a solution) then $p^2mid n-1$ or $p^2mid n+1 $



    First case: If $p^2mid n-1$ then $n+1mid 3p^2-3$ so $ n-1= p^2k$ and $n+1leq 3p^2-3$.



    If $kgeq 3$ then $$3p^2-3geq n+1 >n-1 geq 3p^2$$ which is impossible. So $kleq 2$



    $bullet$ If $k=2$ then $n= 2p^2+1$ so $$2p^2+2mid 3p^2-3 implies 2p^2+2mid 2(3p^2-3)-3(2p^2+2) = -12$$



    So $p^2+1mid 6 implies p^2+1in {1,2,3,6}$ which is impssible.



    $bullet$ If $k=1$ then $n= p^2+1$ so $$p^2+2mid 3p^2-3 implies p^2+2mid (3p^2-3)-3(p^2+2) =-9 $$



    So $p^2+2mid 9 implies p^2+2in {1,3,9}$ which is impossible again.



    Second case: If $p^2mid n+1$ then $n-1mid 3p^2-3$ so $ n+1= p^2k$ and $n-1leq 3p^2-3$.



    Again, if $kgeq 3$ then $$3p^2-3geq n-1 = n+1-2geq 3p^2-2$$ which is impossible. So $kleq 2$



    $bullet$ If $k=2$ then $n= 2p^2-1$ so $2p^2-2mid 3p^2-3$ which is impossible.



    $bullet$ If $k=1$ then $n= p^2-1$ so $$p^2-2mid 3p^2-3 implies p^2-2mid (3p^2-3)-3(p^2-2) =3 $$



    So $p^2-2mid 3 implies p^2-2in {-1,1,3}$ which is impossible again.



    So the answer is negative if $p$ is prime.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited Dec 20 '18 at 11:37

























    answered Dec 20 '18 at 11:30









    greedoidgreedoid

    42.9k1153105




    42.9k1153105








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      what if p is a natural number? Isn't there any way to prove it?
      $endgroup$
      – eandpiandi
      Dec 20 '18 at 12:04














    • 1




      $begingroup$
      what if p is a natural number? Isn't there any way to prove it?
      $endgroup$
      – eandpiandi
      Dec 20 '18 at 12:04








    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    what if p is a natural number? Isn't there any way to prove it?
    $endgroup$
    – eandpiandi
    Dec 20 '18 at 12:04




    $begingroup$
    what if p is a natural number? Isn't there any way to prove it?
    $endgroup$
    – eandpiandi
    Dec 20 '18 at 12:04











    0












    $begingroup$

    Hint about method:



    $3m^2 - 3m + 1 = n^2$ for any n $in$ Natural, for $p^2 = m$.



    $$3m^2 - 3m + 1 - n^2 = 0$$
    $$implies m = frac {3 +sqrt{12n^2-3}}6$$
    $$implies p^2 = frac {3 +sqrt{12n^2-3}}6$$ or
    $$implies p^2 = frac {3 -sqrt{12n^2-3}}6$$



    Now you can just make logical comments yourself about this is valid for above given constraints or not, and make out a bit about the equation.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Thanks, I couldn't spot that mistake.
      $endgroup$
      – PradyumanDixit
      Dec 20 '18 at 12:17
















    0












    $begingroup$

    Hint about method:



    $3m^2 - 3m + 1 = n^2$ for any n $in$ Natural, for $p^2 = m$.



    $$3m^2 - 3m + 1 - n^2 = 0$$
    $$implies m = frac {3 +sqrt{12n^2-3}}6$$
    $$implies p^2 = frac {3 +sqrt{12n^2-3}}6$$ or
    $$implies p^2 = frac {3 -sqrt{12n^2-3}}6$$



    Now you can just make logical comments yourself about this is valid for above given constraints or not, and make out a bit about the equation.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Thanks, I couldn't spot that mistake.
      $endgroup$
      – PradyumanDixit
      Dec 20 '18 at 12:17














    0












    0








    0





    $begingroup$

    Hint about method:



    $3m^2 - 3m + 1 = n^2$ for any n $in$ Natural, for $p^2 = m$.



    $$3m^2 - 3m + 1 - n^2 = 0$$
    $$implies m = frac {3 +sqrt{12n^2-3}}6$$
    $$implies p^2 = frac {3 +sqrt{12n^2-3}}6$$ or
    $$implies p^2 = frac {3 -sqrt{12n^2-3}}6$$



    Now you can just make logical comments yourself about this is valid for above given constraints or not, and make out a bit about the equation.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    Hint about method:



    $3m^2 - 3m + 1 = n^2$ for any n $in$ Natural, for $p^2 = m$.



    $$3m^2 - 3m + 1 - n^2 = 0$$
    $$implies m = frac {3 +sqrt{12n^2-3}}6$$
    $$implies p^2 = frac {3 +sqrt{12n^2-3}}6$$ or
    $$implies p^2 = frac {3 -sqrt{12n^2-3}}6$$



    Now you can just make logical comments yourself about this is valid for above given constraints or not, and make out a bit about the equation.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited Dec 20 '18 at 12:17

























    answered Dec 20 '18 at 11:19









    PradyumanDixitPradyumanDixit

    847214




    847214












    • $begingroup$
      Thanks, I couldn't spot that mistake.
      $endgroup$
      – PradyumanDixit
      Dec 20 '18 at 12:17


















    • $begingroup$
      Thanks, I couldn't spot that mistake.
      $endgroup$
      – PradyumanDixit
      Dec 20 '18 at 12:17
















    $begingroup$
    Thanks, I couldn't spot that mistake.
    $endgroup$
    – PradyumanDixit
    Dec 20 '18 at 12:17




    $begingroup$
    Thanks, I couldn't spot that mistake.
    $endgroup$
    – PradyumanDixit
    Dec 20 '18 at 12:17











    0












    $begingroup$

    You can compare it with general formula for Pythagorean triples: $(p^2-k^2)^2+(2pk)^2=(p^2+k^2)^2$, we have: $(p^2-1)^2+p^2(2p^2-1)$, here $k=1$ and second term must be $(2p)^2$, which is not, so second term is not competent with that of general formula and your tri-nomial can not be square.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      You can compare it with general formula for Pythagorean triples: $(p^2-k^2)^2+(2pk)^2=(p^2+k^2)^2$, we have: $(p^2-1)^2+p^2(2p^2-1)$, here $k=1$ and second term must be $(2p)^2$, which is not, so second term is not competent with that of general formula and your tri-nomial can not be square.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        You can compare it with general formula for Pythagorean triples: $(p^2-k^2)^2+(2pk)^2=(p^2+k^2)^2$, we have: $(p^2-1)^2+p^2(2p^2-1)$, here $k=1$ and second term must be $(2p)^2$, which is not, so second term is not competent with that of general formula and your tri-nomial can not be square.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        You can compare it with general formula for Pythagorean triples: $(p^2-k^2)^2+(2pk)^2=(p^2+k^2)^2$, we have: $(p^2-1)^2+p^2(2p^2-1)$, here $k=1$ and second term must be $(2p)^2$, which is not, so second term is not competent with that of general formula and your tri-nomial can not be square.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 20 '18 at 15:32









        siroussirous

        1,6891514




        1,6891514






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3047428%2fcan-3p4-3p21-be-square-number%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Quarter-circle Tiles

            build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

            Mont Emei