Chebyshev polynomials and trace of $A in SL_2(mathbb{C})$












1












$begingroup$



Defining $C_n(z) = frac{z^m + z^{-m}}{2}$, the Chebyshev polynomials are defined by



$$T_n(C_1(z)) = C_n(z)$$
and are given by $T_1(z) = z, T_2(z) = 2z^2-1, T_3(z) = 4z^3-3z$, etc. Since for $z=e^{itheta}$ we have $C_1(z) = costheta$, they also satisfy



$$T_n(costheta) = cos(ntheta)$$



thereby generalizing the double angle trig identity.




The notes I'm reading also claim $$T_n(text{tr } A/2) = text{tr } (A^n/2)$$ for $A in SL_2(mathbb{C})$. Why does this follow?



Attempt: if $A= begin{pmatrix} a&b \ c &d end{pmatrix}$ then choosing $z=frac12(sqrt{(a+d)^2-4}- (a+d))$ implies $C_1(z) = text{tr }A/2$, but then $T_n(C_1(z)) = frac{z^n+z^{-n}}{2}$ does not simplify as far as I see to $text{tr} A^n/2$.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note that the trace of $A$ is the sum of its eigenvalues and the product of its eigenvalues is by definition $1$.
    $endgroup$
    – WimC
    Dec 25 '18 at 18:09










  • $begingroup$
    @WimC thanks, that resolves it
    $endgroup$
    – Dwagg
    Dec 25 '18 at 18:57
















1












$begingroup$



Defining $C_n(z) = frac{z^m + z^{-m}}{2}$, the Chebyshev polynomials are defined by



$$T_n(C_1(z)) = C_n(z)$$
and are given by $T_1(z) = z, T_2(z) = 2z^2-1, T_3(z) = 4z^3-3z$, etc. Since for $z=e^{itheta}$ we have $C_1(z) = costheta$, they also satisfy



$$T_n(costheta) = cos(ntheta)$$



thereby generalizing the double angle trig identity.




The notes I'm reading also claim $$T_n(text{tr } A/2) = text{tr } (A^n/2)$$ for $A in SL_2(mathbb{C})$. Why does this follow?



Attempt: if $A= begin{pmatrix} a&b \ c &d end{pmatrix}$ then choosing $z=frac12(sqrt{(a+d)^2-4}- (a+d))$ implies $C_1(z) = text{tr }A/2$, but then $T_n(C_1(z)) = frac{z^n+z^{-n}}{2}$ does not simplify as far as I see to $text{tr} A^n/2$.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note that the trace of $A$ is the sum of its eigenvalues and the product of its eigenvalues is by definition $1$.
    $endgroup$
    – WimC
    Dec 25 '18 at 18:09










  • $begingroup$
    @WimC thanks, that resolves it
    $endgroup$
    – Dwagg
    Dec 25 '18 at 18:57














1












1








1





$begingroup$



Defining $C_n(z) = frac{z^m + z^{-m}}{2}$, the Chebyshev polynomials are defined by



$$T_n(C_1(z)) = C_n(z)$$
and are given by $T_1(z) = z, T_2(z) = 2z^2-1, T_3(z) = 4z^3-3z$, etc. Since for $z=e^{itheta}$ we have $C_1(z) = costheta$, they also satisfy



$$T_n(costheta) = cos(ntheta)$$



thereby generalizing the double angle trig identity.




The notes I'm reading also claim $$T_n(text{tr } A/2) = text{tr } (A^n/2)$$ for $A in SL_2(mathbb{C})$. Why does this follow?



Attempt: if $A= begin{pmatrix} a&b \ c &d end{pmatrix}$ then choosing $z=frac12(sqrt{(a+d)^2-4}- (a+d))$ implies $C_1(z) = text{tr }A/2$, but then $T_n(C_1(z)) = frac{z^n+z^{-n}}{2}$ does not simplify as far as I see to $text{tr} A^n/2$.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$





Defining $C_n(z) = frac{z^m + z^{-m}}{2}$, the Chebyshev polynomials are defined by



$$T_n(C_1(z)) = C_n(z)$$
and are given by $T_1(z) = z, T_2(z) = 2z^2-1, T_3(z) = 4z^3-3z$, etc. Since for $z=e^{itheta}$ we have $C_1(z) = costheta$, they also satisfy



$$T_n(costheta) = cos(ntheta)$$



thereby generalizing the double angle trig identity.




The notes I'm reading also claim $$T_n(text{tr } A/2) = text{tr } (A^n/2)$$ for $A in SL_2(mathbb{C})$. Why does this follow?



Attempt: if $A= begin{pmatrix} a&b \ c &d end{pmatrix}$ then choosing $z=frac12(sqrt{(a+d)^2-4}- (a+d))$ implies $C_1(z) = text{tr }A/2$, but then $T_n(C_1(z)) = frac{z^n+z^{-n}}{2}$ does not simplify as far as I see to $text{tr} A^n/2$.







complex-analysis functions trigonometry chebyshev-polynomials






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 25 '18 at 17:44









DwaggDwagg

307111




307111








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note that the trace of $A$ is the sum of its eigenvalues and the product of its eigenvalues is by definition $1$.
    $endgroup$
    – WimC
    Dec 25 '18 at 18:09










  • $begingroup$
    @WimC thanks, that resolves it
    $endgroup$
    – Dwagg
    Dec 25 '18 at 18:57














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note that the trace of $A$ is the sum of its eigenvalues and the product of its eigenvalues is by definition $1$.
    $endgroup$
    – WimC
    Dec 25 '18 at 18:09










  • $begingroup$
    @WimC thanks, that resolves it
    $endgroup$
    – Dwagg
    Dec 25 '18 at 18:57








1




1




$begingroup$
Note that the trace of $A$ is the sum of its eigenvalues and the product of its eigenvalues is by definition $1$.
$endgroup$
– WimC
Dec 25 '18 at 18:09




$begingroup$
Note that the trace of $A$ is the sum of its eigenvalues and the product of its eigenvalues is by definition $1$.
$endgroup$
– WimC
Dec 25 '18 at 18:09












$begingroup$
@WimC thanks, that resolves it
$endgroup$
– Dwagg
Dec 25 '18 at 18:57




$begingroup$
@WimC thanks, that resolves it
$endgroup$
– Dwagg
Dec 25 '18 at 18:57










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

I found several sources with a proof, e.g., the paper by Francis Bonahon, Lemma $8$ on page $9$, using Cayley-Hamilton. Another interesting reference is the paper by Traina on trace polynomials for $SL_2(Bbb{C})$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3052307%2fchebyshev-polynomials-and-trace-of-a-in-sl-2-mathbbc%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2












    $begingroup$

    I found several sources with a proof, e.g., the paper by Francis Bonahon, Lemma $8$ on page $9$, using Cayley-Hamilton. Another interesting reference is the paper by Traina on trace polynomials for $SL_2(Bbb{C})$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      2












      $begingroup$

      I found several sources with a proof, e.g., the paper by Francis Bonahon, Lemma $8$ on page $9$, using Cayley-Hamilton. Another interesting reference is the paper by Traina on trace polynomials for $SL_2(Bbb{C})$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$

        I found several sources with a proof, e.g., the paper by Francis Bonahon, Lemma $8$ on page $9$, using Cayley-Hamilton. Another interesting reference is the paper by Traina on trace polynomials for $SL_2(Bbb{C})$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        I found several sources with a proof, e.g., the paper by Francis Bonahon, Lemma $8$ on page $9$, using Cayley-Hamilton. Another interesting reference is the paper by Traina on trace polynomials for $SL_2(Bbb{C})$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 25 '18 at 18:08









        Dietrich BurdeDietrich Burde

        79.6k647103




        79.6k647103






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3052307%2fchebyshev-polynomials-and-trace-of-a-in-sl-2-mathbbc%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Quarter-circle Tiles

            build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

            Mont Emei